>>388561Mandela effect, the cover of that album, the holy bible, the world map, and even that magical fairy dust they sell in these corners only you know about.
>>388565Yes. Years ago, I awoke in a sweat with my adrenaline pumping and the memories of a failed experiment. I had "fallen outside the universe" (whatever the fuck that meant) along with a room full of other people. I was leading the experiment... when (most of us?) got back, we realized the empty seats and blurted out "We have no way to know who is missing" and then stared at the chalk board and said "Starting over" and then I was in my body in my 20s again with a screaming hatred of chalk boards and decided that the easiest way to change the future is to never own a fucking chalk board. Should I ever have one in my possession, I have sworn to shoot the thing immediately with a shotgun or similar destructive device.
My guess is somebody ass-wiped the board and it fucked everything up... meh... It will be different anyhow.
The one truly useful thing that I determined though is that the amount of data I could have sent back to myself, is limited solely by the amount of short-term memory my brain can hold at one time. I've been training to store more, so that if it ever happens again I can send a larger batch of data to myself, even if it's at a later age in my life.
>>390808On an experimental level the 'you' that did the experiment got 'lost'.
So if it's to be done again you need an outside and inside observer who is faithful and will inform you.
There's two recommendations I have, send a copy of memories and not everything in a controlled environment the second is Jesus Christ.
Even those who 'disappeared' He brings together His flock.
One of the people from one of the empty seats is "Michael", to not loop yet keep the experience he skipped out of coming.
Thus the fourth iteration of not quite timetravel didn't see that participant. Yet remembering iteration one through three.
Now you're here after the frustrating experience of incomplete chalk board notes. Sending a message through a straw yet trying to force an ocean through would have the straw break.
Those notes didn't account for the means or the message and the ability thereof to be unbroken.
Either a better 'straw' or a message that fits the size of the 'straw'.