/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>377689
>front row, right to left
A priest, a jew, Donald Trump, a blond, and Jim Gaffagin walk into a bar,....

>>377689
Shots fired!

>>377681
>How bad do you think the internal polling is right now?
Not good.

Wait, a jewish guy has no idea how to interface with the catholics? How surprising

Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win? After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different.

>>377720
>Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win?
It's a toss-up, but I'm feeling optimistic.
>After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different.
It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny. Even if they could, the costs outweigh the benefits for the powers that be.

Go vote, preferably early.

>>377721
>It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny
The naïvete. Human lives are expendable to these people, but you think "extra dollars" is gonna discourage? Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3?

>>377732
If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire. If Kamala "wins" it just means that she owns the dumpster fire for the next four years, just beating Trump doesn't automatically make the democrats' problems go away. People on both sides are already pretty unhappy. Lefties tolerate the current administration and are willing to vote for Kamala if it keeps Trump out of office, but they don't like her or Biden. If the election rigging is so obvious that not even normies can ignore it, plus Kamala turns out to be as shitty a president as Biden, which she would be guaranteed to, they're going to be facing a mutiny from all sides.

>Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3?
If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you. Dealing with widespread general discontent while simultaneously trying to fight an unpopular war is a bad position to be in.

It all depends on how badly they want to get rid of orange man bad I guess, but I have to assume that if I know what a pyrrhic victory is, someone on their side is probably also familiar with the concept.

>>377721
Anyway, I'm concurring with this anon. Vote Trump, there is literally no reason not to.

>>377733
>If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire
The people who it would backfire on are irrelevant to the people who got away with inserting Kamala by fiat, let alone compared to all the damage that would be done in the interim. And then theres the fact that if we're at war, opposition to govt is treason.
>If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you
The people who want war who you should be worried about don't care about public opinion, in fact they rather hope that the US destabilizes while hot war starts popping off

>>377734
How compelling.
Still voting for Trump.

>>377742
When did anyone suggest voting for other than Trump?

Same energy

>>377752
Eh, the latter still reeks of far more malevolence and narcissism. The former reeks too, but more of desperation

Hillary MEANT for that tweet to be a call to GET IN LINE, whereas the Democrat Party meant probably a dozen things with Kamala

The bitch's betting odds just fell under 40.

>>377763
The commie rats are starting to jump ship.

>>377742
>>377747
I think if you're in a blue state, like Commiefornia or Nog York, you should vote for Jill Stein. If she gets significant turn out it will cause seething among jew-know-who.

>>377778
I second this. Libs are already seething about it.
40% if Muslim voters in Michigan are going to vote for JILF because of her stance on Palestine, and libs are livid that that's enough to sway the margin of victory in that state.

Kamala was designed in a Kenyan lab by Obama's team of Muslim scientists

They committed crimes against humanity by combining the most globally hated races (black/indian) in the body of the most evil of all genders (woman) to create the least likable being in all of existence

>>377778
I live in a deep-blue state, and this is actually tempting.

>>377778
The one drawback would be that it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before.
If JILF gets a substantial margin, they can blame their failure on her.
If Harris wins the popular vote but loses the electoral college, they can blame their failure on the system.
If Harris loses the popular vote, they have nobody to blame but themselves.

>>377783
>it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before.
Yea, they would cry even harder because muh democracy, muh one "man" one vote, muh constitution is a thing of the white man and needs to be abolished, and so on.

>>377807
Vote anyway

>>377809
Yes, but, prepare cuz no matter the turnout:
>>377807
This

What I mean is, force may be necessary. They may push the line there, and dare us to cross it. What do they have to lose?

>>377812
>force may be necessary
What do you propose doing?

>>377814
Hope and pray anon, hope and pray

>>377816
That's not force.

This bitch has no values or beliefs beyond whatever her party says is the agenda. She's completely empty inside.
https://x.com/i/status/1849264308972122512

>>377817
Are you asking what force should be applied to an as yet unknown and most likely unprecedented level of shenanigens?
Specifically, are you asking me to try to predict which of the number of agendas and scenarios they're actually gonna go with?
Cuz thats absurd. Imo the best a person can do is assess what's possible and plausible. What do you think?

Gay thread, kill yourself

>>377822
Lurk moar, newfag

>>377822
And a "die in fire" to you, sir

>>377819
Well, you say that for d should be necessary, and that we should be prepared, but what kind of force are you referring to?

>>377812
>>377814
>>377816
>>377817
>>377819
>>377826
Well, we only have to wait another week or so to find out what happens, so it's probably not worth arguing this hard about.

>>377822
MAMMA MIA

>>377826
You tried. Please offer a comprehensible,... anything next time.
What can be sussed out:
>what kind of force are you referring to?
The kind of force required to uproot the entrenched interests and resources of billionaires on Epstein's client list. The kind of force required to uproot a current standing president with the most blatant corruption/conflict-of-interst scenario with his son, all while the left is screaming about injustice and anti-democracy because (((they))) are currently engaged in a psyop to paint the legitimate operations of government and court are occurring.
There may be more, depends on how specific you want

>>377830
You won't do shit nigger.

>>377831
Son, you think the things needing to be done are on the internet?

I love Rarity

>>377842
Based Rarity enjoyer.

Bitch got boo'd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRVn60iO6LU