>>375310 Administration is the realm of men. For a women to have the fortitude to sustain within politics would require her to have rejected her womanhood, her humanity. What's left is a psychopath.
Is Biden even alive right now? Maybe he refused to step down so they pushed him down the stairs and said it was covid. Who knows at this point. American politics is such a dog and pony show
I saw the ad where she calls Trump an "existential threat to our democracy". Just fucking end this farce. Only the most braindead coma patients can still believe that fucking narrative. God damn it.
>>374873 She's a <50IQ, heavily inbred East Indian descendant whom happens to be a wannabe dothead. Heels Up Harris was her likely official sexworker name while [working as a barista & bartender], due to the number of paid-for sexual encounters which occurred during her time as a [drink server]. Indians, whether native (in India that is) or immigrated, utterly despise her: nearly all family and politicuck connections are ziofags, with an unusual number of banker and human trafficking (((friends))).
She would be unable to remove herself from a soaking wet paper bag with excessive aid.
I saw this image today, and realized that I can no longer tell the difference between clever memes making fun of Democrat propaganda and actual Democrat propaganda.
>>375449 Based imaginary old man. Do people still make these "and everyone clapped" posts unironically? Those were already regarded as jokes even back then.
>>375450 People who live unremarkable, pointless lives can't resist making up stories to feel better about themselves and fight off the crushing weight of nihilism.
Remember when MSM outlets were parroting the same dialogue about journalistic integrity and misinformation to imply that reports of Obama vaporizing Syrian kids was a hoax? Harris' campaign is playing that card again but this time their strategy is to label their two male opponents as... Creepy and weird and so like, not vibing. Yikes. You wouldn't vote for these two weirdos, would you anon? You friends and family might think you're a creep.
https://fixupx.com/elonmusk/status/1818296731655721420 Question: >How are you going to combat inflation? Answer: >The cost of living is going up and that's hitting families hard. Build Back Better will help, and it won't cost anything because we'll pay for it. Lmao, she has nothing.
>>375574 It was never meant to deter shills. Shills are deterred only by the fact that this board is so slow that it's not worth paying people to post here. Horsepussy just deters redditors and other normies who would otherwise shit up the place.
>>375583 Shut the fuck up, you retarded nigger. I made this thread, and I'm a regular. The thread is an obvious parody of the 2016 Hillary Clinton threads, repurposed into an info dump on Kamala Harris. Learn to recognize irony.
>>375594 Lmao, imagine being this retarded. Learn to take a joke. Besides, since you didn't notice, this thread was made before Biden dropped out and the Harris astroturfing began. Ask me how I can tell you're a tourist.
>>375594 >spammed all over pol Oh, I see how it is. You're a 4/pol/ refugee who's come now that 4/pol/ has been rendered unusable by the sudden influx of astroturfing last week. Calm down, Anon. We're chill here. Embrace the mares.
>>375599 I suppose they need to put that money to use. The woman literally has fuck all for a platform. Every ad and speech has just been some sort of "fuck the other guy, I'm just better mkay?!". The democrats obviously in utter turmoil, probably busier debating whether to cheat harder this November or appease former Biden donation monies than actually giving a shit about Harris and her retarded antics.
>>375652 They seem to be putting a lot of work into astroturfing a serious campaign for her, or at least serious by lefty standards. I don't follow normie social media at all so I have no idea whether or not it's actually successful, but they seem to be trying pretty hard to meme her into office. From what I've seen the memes are pretty bizarre, something to do with coconuts and Trump/Vance being weird. Also, apparently Kamala is "brat," whatever the fuck that's supposed to mean; I assume it's some kind of zoomer slang.
>>375682 zoomer here, I have no idea what the fuck "brat" is supposed to mean other than the normal meaning of "petulent child with a superiority complex", which I guess fits this bitch halfway decently.
> This race is Trump’s to lose. Kamala has no shot at legitimately winning the 2024 Presidential election. > Should the DC regime install Kamala, it will mean the end of our constitutional order and of free and fair elections. > The regime cannot survive the installation of another astroturfed and unpopular political leader into the highest office in the land. > Not only is Kamala a train wreck in her own right, but Donald Trump has never been more popular than he is right now. > Kamala is a line in the sand. If she can be installed in the presidency, then there is no reason to keep holding elections; the DNC and its media apparatchiks can simply make or break the presidency with a snap of the fingers. tl;dr the literal only way Kamala can win is if they cheat again, and if they do it will be so obvious that only the most oblivious normies will honestly still believe in the system afterward. Either Trump wins or the last tiny shred of legitimacy the American system has left goes sailing away in the breeze, one of these two things will happen.
>>376024 Polls seem to heavily bias toward specific sides, which if true, is probably even worse. Imagine a poll secretly overwhelmingly democrats still coming out 50/50. How horrible can a canidate be that half your own party prefers the literal opposite.
>>376127 It ain't photoshop, just camera trickery. I genuinely no longer know what is true about this woman. There is fuck all on what positions she even holds, apart from "Orange Man Bad" or some shit. She is literally running purely off media constructing this cult of personality. Don't even know why they bother, James K. Polk became president with most of the country not even knowing who the fuck he was. My mind is boggled to hell man. Just...
>trailing in polls >Trump lead grows each week >switches to Trump's positions >same ones shitlibs taught to hate for 8 years >wants to BUILD THE F***KING WALL now >thrashed by army of gold star families >only interview was disaster >friendly reporter >in the tank for her campaign >cut down to 18 mins >had her VP chaperone >still looked retarded
>>376651 >Vote for Kamala if you want this to happen to your neighborhood A feisty reminder that most of those faggots and bitches crying foul actually voted for it.
Oh shit, with Kamala is getting help from Destiny, how is Trump going to react when Kamala invites another woman to fuck her husband in front of her? Can Trump handle those kind of psychological plays?
>>377057 Yes. I believe it's something like 14 of the 16 big name ships used in the Afro-American slave trade were owned and operated by Jews. Worse yet is that many of the Semites acquired the ships through usury collateral.
>>377063 There was an infograph once that alleged that: 0.5% of colonials owned slaves. Of that 0.5%, ~80% were jewish. So yes, jews were astonishingly over-represented in both slave trading and slave ownership.
>>377678 The fat lady hasn't sung yet. There's still any number of shenanigens they could try, including a hail-mary 'even more obvious than last time voting-machine' scheme that they think they can brute-force the population into accepting.
ESPECIALLY if there's a convenient an urgent crisis (((somewhere))) "demanding immediate/ongoing" executive action/oversight. This doesn't feel like a final form
>>377681 >How bad do you think the internal polling is right now? Probably worse than external polls, which show a toss-up tie Trump's slight favor (within margin of error, so don't get complacent). >The current year man just released this: Yeah, I've been seeing shit like this since last week. Democrats know it's quite possible, perhaps even probable, that they are going to lose this election, so they're already downplaying themer failure and calling the system rigged. I've been seeing the "why the electoral college is unfair" articles popping up too, which is an early sign of cope. For the past 4 years Democrats have screamed at Republicans for being "election deniers", but in reality they have been doing the same shit for at least 20 years since Bush's narrow victory, if not longer than that. We all remember the bullshit Russiagate nonsense that wasn't grounded in reality.
>>377682 I still run into people who swear up and down that Gore won the 2000 election, and they're still legitimately angry about it.
>>377679 >>377680 it's possible, but those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election. If they cheat so obviously that even normies can tell it's not going to do them much good. And if they're going to try the "crisis" angle it would need to be something pretty huge that we haven't seen before. I doubt the "pandemic" trick would work again.
The other thing to consider is that even if they do pull off a win, either legitimately or not, they're still stuck with this babbling dimwit as president for 4 years. The only thing motivating and holding the democrat coalition together at this point is hating Trump, so as soon as they don't have him to kick around anymore they basically own the whole dumpster fire.
>>377683 >those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election UNLESS there's also an emergency military conflict/action. You really think they won't play the "unprecedented emergency" card like they did LAST election, and then just railroad in all the shenanigens? It's possible that crying normies and an increasingly discontent, militant, and (cuz it's wartime powers) treasonous voting majority is part of the plan
Not to sound paranoid but if you identify for and prepare for the worst, while you won't be best prepared/positioned to take full advantage of the best-case circumstantial outcome, you will be better off proportionately with how much worse the circumstantial outcome is
>>377687 Without knowing the scope youre trying to address: - Seek to have a not-electrically-dependent supply of food capable of lasting anywhere from two weeks to a few months - Establish/maintain a rapport with neighbors to facilitate barter and reapurce sharing if needed - Starlink, niggers
>PRESIDENT TRUMP: "There’s a group called “White Dudes for Harris”... but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me."
>Refuse to show up to huge traditional pre-campaign comedy event that goes back to WW2 era >Send in shitty videotape of Molly Shannon doing her schoolgirl character from 30 years ago on SNL >shitty videotape shits on Catholics instead of making candidate jokes >Kameltoe makes no attempt at humor on shitty video >Trump shows up once again in a liberal stronghold with a hostile crowd, gets laughs and has a good time anway >The Cardinal noticeably does NOT thank you in his closing remarks >tfw you are a stupid fucking retarded bitch and it could not be more over
Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win? After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different.
>>377720 >Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win? It's a toss-up, but I'm feeling optimistic. >After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different. It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny. Even if they could, the costs outweigh the benefits for the powers that be.
>>377721 >It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny The naïvete. Human lives are expendable to these people, but you think "extra dollars" is gonna discourage? Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3?
>>377732 If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire. If Kamala "wins" it just means that she owns the dumpster fire for the next four years, just beating Trump doesn't automatically make the democrats' problems go away. People on both sides are already pretty unhappy. Lefties tolerate the current administration and are willing to vote for Kamala if it keeps Trump out of office, but they don't like her or Biden. If the election rigging is so obvious that not even normies can ignore it, plus Kamala turns out to be as shitty a president as Biden, which she would be guaranteed to, they're going to be facing a mutiny from all sides.
>Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3? If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you. Dealing with widespread general discontent while simultaneously trying to fight an unpopular war is a bad position to be in.
It all depends on how badly they want to get rid of orange man bad I guess, but I have to assume that if I know what a pyrrhic victory is, someone on their side is probably also familiar with the concept.
>>377721 Anyway, I'm concurring with this anon. Vote Trump, there is literally no reason not to.
>>377733 >If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire The people who it would backfire on are irrelevant to the people who got away with inserting Kamala by fiat, let alone compared to all the damage that would be done in the interim. And then theres the fact that if we're at war, opposition to govt is treason. >If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you The people who want war who you should be worried about don't care about public opinion, in fact they rather hope that the US destabilizes while hot war starts popping off
>>377742 >>377747 I think if you're in a blue state, like Commiefornia or Nog York, you should vote for Jill Stein. If she gets significant turn out it will cause seething among jew-know-who.
>>377778 I second this. Libs are already seething about it. 40% if Muslim voters in Michigan are going to vote for JILF because of her stance on Palestine, and libs are livid that that's enough to sway the margin of victory in that state.
Kamala was designed in a Kenyan lab by Obama's team of Muslim scientists
They committed crimes against humanity by combining the most globally hated races (black/indian) in the body of the most evil of all genders (woman) to create the least likable being in all of existence
>>377778 The one drawback would be that it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before. If JILF gets a substantial margin, they can blame their failure on her. If Harris wins the popular vote but loses the electoral college, they can blame their failure on the system. If Harris loses the popular vote, they have nobody to blame but themselves.
>>377783 >it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before. Yea, they would cry even harder because muh democracy, muh one "man" one vote, muh constitution is a thing of the white man and needs to be abolished, and so on.
>>377817 Are you asking what force should be applied to an as yet unknown and most likely unprecedented level of shenanigens? Specifically, are you asking me to try to predict which of the number of agendas and scenarios they're actually gonna go with? Cuz thats absurd. Imo the best a person can do is assess what's possible and plausible. What do you think?
>>377826 You tried. Please offer a comprehensible,... anything next time. What can be sussed out: >what kind of force are you referring to? The kind of force required to uproot the entrenched interests and resources of billionaires on Epstein's client list. The kind of force required to uproot a current standing president with the most blatant corruption/conflict-of-interst scenario with his son, all while the left is screaming about injustice and anti-democracy because (((they))) are currently engaged in a psyop to paint the legitimate operations of government and court are occurring. There may be more, depends on how specific you want
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts. Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.