/mlpol/ - SAY IT WITH ME: MADAM PRESIDENT

Name
Email	Don't show my flag
Subject	Spoiler Image By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment	0
Select	File / Oekaki
File(s)	Oekaki drawing - Select File instead
Oekaki
Password	(For file and/or post deletion.)

>wired earphones in
>and holding the phone up to her ear
She's a terrified, drunken wreck lel

Kamala Harris: As President I will sign Reparations Bill

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tWUDHSk19Q

Once you attend the Kamala Rally, you stay at the Kamala Rally... FOREVER!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113108859330006911
I can't wait for him to bring this up in the debates tomorrow.

>>376651
>Vote for Kamala if you want this to happen to your neighborhood
A feisty reminder that most of those faggots and bitches crying foul actually voted for it.

>>376660
>most of those faggots and bitches crying foul actually voted for it
People in Springfield Ohio voted for that? I don't believe so.

Oh shit, with Kamala is getting help from Destiny, how is Trump going to react when Kamala invites another woman to fuck her husband in front of her? Can Trump handle those kind of psychological plays?

How much liquor does this woman have in her?

How Do You Do Fellow Whites?

>>376667

You'll never guess who was capturing young black men and putting them into chains back in 1690.

>>377021
Statistically speaking….

>>377057
Yes. I believe it's something like 14 of the 16 big name ships used in the Afro-American slave trade were owned and operated by Jews. Worse yet is that many of the Semites acquired the ships through usury collateral.

>>377063
There was an infograph once that alleged that:
0.5% of colonials owned slaves.
Of that 0.5%, ~80% were jewish.
So yes, jews were astonishingly over-represented in both slave trading and slave ownership.

>cmon Brett you know what I’m talking about
>I actually don’t know what you’re talking about
Mfw

Democrats could have lost with dignity with Biden, but now they've handcuffed themselves to a dead hooker and there's no going back.

>>377673
At least with Biden they had his senility to use as an excuse

>>377675
When Harris loses they'll cry racism/sexual, but they do that all of the time so nobody will care.

>>377671
Some reddit cope

>>377677
Imagine the salt when she loses in November. I hope you guys are prepared to post it all.

>>377678
The fat lady hasn't sung yet. There's still any number of shenanigens they could try, including a hail-mary 'even more obvious than last time voting-machine' scheme that they think they can brute-force the population into accepting.

ESPECIALLY if there's ~~a convenient~~ an urgent crisis (((somewhere))) "demanding immediate/ongoing" executive action/oversight. This doesn't feel like a final form

How bad do you think the internal polling is right now? The current year man just released this:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CkK3W0lOKcc&pp=ygULam9obiBvbGl2ZXI%3D

>>377681
>How bad do you think the internal polling is right now?
Probably worse than external polls, which show a toss-up tie Trump's slight favor (within margin of error, so don't get complacent).
>The current year man just released this:
Yeah, I've been seeing shit like this since last week. Democrats know it's quite possible, perhaps even probable, that they are going to lose this election, so they're already downplaying themer failure and calling the system rigged. I've been seeing the "why the electoral college is unfair" articles popping up too, which is an early sign of cope.
For the past 4 years Democrats have screamed at Republicans for being "election deniers", but in reality they have been doing the same shit for at least 20 years since Bush's narrow victory, if not longer than that. We all remember the bullshit Russiagate nonsense that wasn't grounded in reality.

>>377682
I still run into people who swear up and down that Gore won the 2000 election, and they're still legitimately angry about it.

>>377679
>>377680
it's possible, but those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election. If they cheat so obviously that even normies can tell it's not going to do them much good. And if they're going to try the "crisis" angle it would need to be something pretty huge that we haven't seen before. I doubt the "pandemic" trick would work again.

The other thing to consider is that even if they do pull off a win, either legitimately or not, they're still stuck with this babbling dimwit as president for 4 years. The only thing motivating and holding the democrat coalition together at this point is hating Trump, so as soon as they don't have him to kick around anymore they basically own the whole dumpster fire.

>>377683
>those kinds of tricks only work when the margins are thin enough that dumping a few thousand extra mail in ballots into a couple of key districts can swing the election
UNLESS there's also an emergency military conflict/action. You really think they won't play the "unprecedented emergency" card like they did LAST election, and then just railroad in all the shenanigens?
It's possible that crying normies and an increasingly discontent, militant, and (cuz it's wartime powers) treasonous voting majority is part of the plan

Not to sound paranoid but if you identify for and prepare for the worst, while you won't be best prepared/positioned to take full advantage of the best-case circumstantial outcome, you will be better off proportionately with how much worse the circumstantial outcome is

>>377686
How are you preparing? You're giving a lot of what-if scenarios, but no word on how we should respond, let alone how you are preparing.

>>377687
Without knowing the scope youre trying to address:
- Seek to have a not-electrically-dependent supply of food capable of lasting anywhere from two weeks to a few months
- Establish/maintain a rapport with neighbors to facilitate barter and reapurce sharing if needed
- Starlink, niggers

>PRESIDENT TRUMP: "There’s a group called “White Dudes for Harris”... but I’m not worried about them at all, because their wives and their wives’ lovers are all voting for me."

>>377689
>front row, right to left
A priest, a jew, Donald Trump, a blond, and Jim Gaffagin walk into a bar,....

>>377689
Shots fired!

>all the other dem leaders went tho

>Refuse to show up to huge traditional pre-campaign comedy event that goes back to WW2 era
>Send in shitty videotape of Molly Shannon doing her schoolgirl character from 30 years ago on SNL
>shitty videotape shits on Catholics instead of making candidate jokes
>Kameltoe makes no attempt at humor on shitty video
>Trump shows up once again in a liberal stronghold with a hostile crowd, gets laughs and has a good time anway
>The Cardinal noticeably does NOT thank you in his closing remarks
>tfw you are a stupid fucking retarded bitch and it could not be more over

>>377681
>How bad do you think the internal polling is right now?
Not good.

Wait, a jewish guy has no idea how to interface with the catholics? How surprising

Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win? After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different.

>>377720
>Do you guys think Trump is actually going to win?
It's a toss-up, but I'm feeling optimistic.
>After 2020 I can't see there being a fair election. Nobody had given a good answer as to how this election will be different.
It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny. Even if they could, the costs outweigh the benefits for the powers that be.

Go vote, preferably early.

>>377721
>It would be exponentially more expensive and difficult to do mass voter fraud this time, let alone get away with it with all the heightened scrutiny
The naïvete. Human lives are expendable to these people, but you think "extra dollars" is gonna discourage? Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3?

>>377732
If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire. If Kamala "wins" it just means that she owns the dumpster fire for the next four years, just beating Trump doesn't automatically make the democrats' problems go away. People on both sides are already pretty unhappy. Lefties tolerate the current administration and are willing to vote for Kamala if it keeps Trump out of office, but they don't like her or Biden. If the election rigging is so obvious that not even normies can ignore it, plus Kamala turns out to be as shitty a president as Biden, which she would be guaranteed to, they're going to be facing a mutiny from all sides.

>Aren't we in spitting distance of WW3?
If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you. Dealing with widespread general discontent while simultaneously trying to fight an unpopular war is a bad position to be in.

It all depends on how badly they want to get rid of orange man bad I guess, but I have to assume that if I know what a pyrrhic victory is, someone on their side is probably also familiar with the concept.

>>377721
Anyway, I'm concurring with this anon. Vote Trump, there is literally no reason not to.

>>377733
>If they cheat too obviously people are going to notice and it will backfire
The people who it would backfire on are irrelevant to the people who got away with inserting Kamala by fiat, let alone compared to all the damage that would be done in the interim. And then theres the fact that if we're at war, opposition to govt is treason.
>If you're about to get pulled into and/or deliberately start a major war, you want the population more or less behind you
The people who want war who you should be worried about don't care about public opinion, in fact they rather hope that the US destabilizes while hot war starts popping off

>>377734
How compelling.
Still voting for Trump.

>>377742
When did anyone suggest voting for other than Trump?

>>377752
Eh, the latter still reeks of far more malevolence and narcissism. The former reeks too, but more of desperation

Hillary MEANT for that tweet to be a call to GET IN LINE, whereas the Democrat Party meant probably a dozen things with Kamala

The bitch's betting odds just fell under 40.

>>377763
The commie rats are starting to jump ship.

>>377742
>>377747
I think if you're in a blue state, like Commiefornia or Nog York, you should vote for Jill Stein. If she gets significant turn out it will cause seething among jew-know-who.

>>377778
I second this. Libs are already seething about it.
40% if Muslim voters in Michigan are going to vote for JILF because of her stance on Palestine, and libs are livid that that's enough to sway the margin of victory in that state.

Kamala was designed in a Kenyan lab by Obama's team of Muslim scientists

They committed crimes against humanity by combining the most globally hated races (black/indian) in the body of the most evil of all genders (woman) to create the least likable being in all of existence

>>377778
I live in a deep-blue state, and this is actually tempting.

>>377778
The one drawback would be that it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before.
If JILF gets a substantial margin, they can blame their failure on her.
If Harris wins the popular vote but loses the electoral college, they can blame their failure on the system.
If Harris loses the popular vote, they have nobody to blame but themselves.

>>377783
>it would run opposed to Trump winning the popular vote, which would make Democrats seethe like never before.
Yea, they would cry even harder because muh democracy, muh one "man" one vote, muh constitution is a thing of the white man and needs to be abolished, and so on.

>>377807
Vote anyway

>>377809
Yes, but, prepare cuz no matter the turnout:
>>377807
This

What I mean is, force may be necessary. They may push the line there, and dare us to cross it. What do they have to lose?

>inb4 the democrats pull a false-flag voter fraud campaign to pass obviously fraudulent ballots for Trump

>>377812
>force may be necessary
What do you propose doing?

>>377814
Hope and pray anon, hope and pray

>>377816
That's not force.

This bitch has no values or beliefs beyond whatever her party says is the agenda. She's completely empty inside.
https://x.com/i/status/1849264308972122512

>>377817
Are you asking what force should be applied to an as yet unknown and most likely unprecedented level of shenanigens?
Specifically, are you asking me to try to predict which of the number of agendas and scenarios they're actually gonna go with?
Cuz thats absurd. Imo the best a person can do is assess what's possible and plausible. What do you think?

Gay thread, kill yourself

>>377822
Lurk moar, newfag

>>377822
And a "die in fire" to you, sir

>>377819
Well, you say that for d should be necessary, and that we should be prepared, but what kind of force are you referring to?

>>377812
>>377814
>>377816
>>377817
>>377819
>>377826
Well, we only have to wait another week or so to find out what happens, so it's probably not worth arguing this hard about.

>>377826
You tried. Please offer a comprehensible,... anything next time.
What can be sussed out:
>what kind of force are you referring to?
The kind of force required to uproot the entrenched interests and resources of billionaires on Epstein's client list. The kind of force required to uproot a current standing president with the most blatant corruption/conflict-of-interst scenario with his son, all while the left is screaming about injustice and anti-democracy because (((they))) are currently engaged in a psyop to paint the legitimate operations of government and court are occurring.
There may be more, depends on how specific you want