https://youtu.be/vTXCAxiA94U
What kind of mind does it take to defend this garbage?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
File (): F61E2E51F28EC107A68E7E57ABDB8985-451739.jpg (441.2 KB, 1079x825, Screenshot_2024-06-11-08-45-25-77_f9ee0578fe1cc94de7482bd41accb329.jpg)
In a world that's very rapidly going to shit we all have our vices and copes. Theirs just happen to be abhorrent
Its not like they really care about gay pride anyway they only make shit like this so more faggots can be into the show therefore they will gain more profit
>>373805
>they only make shit like this so more faggots can be into the show therefore they will gain more profit
That was the last episode of the series, so it can't be that.
I think they just did it because Ashleigh Ball has been Yuri shipping them on Facebook for years.
>they only make shit like this so more faggots can be into the show therefore they will gain more profit
That was the last episode of the series, so it can't be that.
I think they just did it because Ashleigh Ball has been Yuri shipping them on Facebook for years.
>>373806
yeah but they had to sell the new series with the nigger applejack and the godawful art style
yeah but they had to sell the new series with the nigger applejack and the godawful art style
>>373806
>That was the last episode of the series
So? Ion get it how is that supposed to disprove my point
>That was the last episode of the series
So? Ion get it how is that supposed to disprove my point
>>373813
I get it but im saying that even if i noticed the last episode of a show that i didnt watch it can still enspire me to watch it, the show's episodes dont have to be ongoing
I get it but im saying that even if i noticed the last episode of a show that i didnt watch it can still enspire me to watch it, the show's episodes dont have to be ongoing
>>373814
How would they gain more profit off a show that's already ended?
Not to mention, faggots are only like ~2% of the population: not a reliable consumer base.
How would they gain more profit off a show that's already ended?
Not to mention, faggots are only like ~2% of the population: not a reliable consumer base.
>>373817
If Hasbro still considered G4 to be profitable, they would have just continued to make episodes of G4.
If Hasbro still considered G4 to be profitable, they would have just continued to make episodes of G4.
>>373818
I don't get the impression Hasbro considers much of anything to be profitable these days, from what I understand it's mostly Wizards of the Coast that's keeping them afloat.
I don't get the impression Hasbro considers much of anything to be profitable these days, from what I understand it's mostly Wizards of the Coast that's keeping them afloat.
>>373820
Hasbro owns a ton of IPs, none of which it treats well.
They just cut 20% of WotC's staff, and the CEO of WotC resigned not too long ago.
Hasbro owns a ton of IPs, none of which it treats well.
They just cut 20% of WotC's staff, and the CEO of WotC resigned not too long ago.
>>373821
that's because WOTC is deep in the looting phase of destroying their brands, they went woke too and are in the process of going broke. Nobody's buying MTG anymore, nobody gives a single fuck about 5e as much as they shill critical hole
that's because WOTC is deep in the looting phase of destroying their brands, they went woke too and are in the process of going broke. Nobody's buying MTG anymore, nobody gives a single fuck about 5e as much as they shill critical hole
>>373824
>they went woke too and are in the process of going broke
I don't even think it's the wokeness that's killing them. Their biggest competitor, Pathfinder, doesn't skip a beat with the woke stuff, but is still doing fine because the content of their games is good.
WotC is imploding because Hasbro is butchering isn't even milking them; they're butchering the cow to sell off. Their d&d books are barely worth the paper they're printed on due to the lack of content inside them, which stems from Hasbro limiting the number of full-time writers and content creators they're allowed to hire and how much content they're allowed to have per book (also they kill all of the hype ala UA playtests).
This is on top of the new trend towards AIslop that Hasbro is insisting on trying, with the AI gen'd MTG card art, the leaks that implied simplifying D&D rules to supposedly accommodate "AI DMs", and the scandal over the AI voices they wanted to put in Tell Your Tale (which got cancelled over the disagreement).
Hasbro, as an entertainment company, is completely reliant on writers and artists, but the executives at the top always seems to think they can cut the creative thinkers and content creators out of the picture, like how they fired Lauren Faust in FiM.
>they went woke too and are in the process of going broke
I don't even think it's the wokeness that's killing them. Their biggest competitor, Pathfinder, doesn't skip a beat with the woke stuff, but is still doing fine because the content of their games is good.
WotC is imploding because Hasbro is butchering isn't even milking them; they're butchering the cow to sell off. Their d&d books are barely worth the paper they're printed on due to the lack of content inside them, which stems from Hasbro limiting the number of full-time writers and content creators they're allowed to hire and how much content they're allowed to have per book (also they kill all of the hype ala UA playtests).
This is on top of the new trend towards AIslop that Hasbro is insisting on trying, with the AI gen'd MTG card art, the leaks that implied simplifying D&D rules to supposedly accommodate "AI DMs", and the scandal over the AI voices they wanted to put in Tell Your Tale (which got cancelled over the disagreement).
Hasbro, as an entertainment company, is completely reliant on writers and artists, but the executives at the top always seems to think they can cut the creative thinkers and content creators out of the picture, like how they fired Lauren Faust in FiM.