297 replies and 494 files omitted.
>>381828Make note that I left the thread to not sidetrack it further before I continue.
>>381816>>381814Who delete my posts? It was relevant, as I explained, because it displayed, imo, a double standard of the moderation, and therefore relevant to the conversation of censorship.
If it's not, just correct me. The information about these to individuals in question cannot seriously be considered private. They have both been very open with who they are. I even said that it wasn't censorship per say but more that it compromised the thread in question, only for someone to remove my posts?
>>381838I don't really get it. You also suggested, if a bit dis-genuinely (perhaps sarcastic), to bring it up in /qa/ but you started saging, which indicates that you don't want to sidetrack the thread (which, I respect), yet I left first? Sure, if you want the last word, you got it, I can relate, but stop posting now. Take it to the pony pub thread and just leave link to there, here. Otherwise, you can't expect conversation to cease here, especially if you write:
>If I have lied, may somepony correct me.Also:
>Seriously, you chose this bringing it here. He did not. OP did.
[Read more] >>381860Sorry, if this come off as aggressive. I was irritated since I felt I was treated unfairly, but I'm gonna try to be open-minded to your response. As stated before, I don't dislike anyone here and I don't wish to start a fight over a disagreement.
We have an entire board for /qa/ issues. Can we please not shit up the funny jokes thread with meta site rules arguments?
>>381862Appreciating your position, there's a case to be made against. That case is precipitated by the notion that we have a whole fucking board that's largely languishing.
Ahem. No. I mean yes, we do have an entire board for /qa/ issues, but we also have an ENTIRE board that is being,... not utilized to the fullest. A bit of tomfoolery isn't egregious considering the boundaries; we can worry about "proper posting" when we have enough users, imo
>>381864Nono, that's (you) who thinks that flat earth is a real thing that needs discussing in this thread.
Trust me, this is not the dopamine you are looking for
>>381865Ah shit i meant to respond to
>>381860 my bad.
>>381866>using a vpnWise, but far from fool-proof. If your intention is to display your technique so it can be summarily countered, you're on the right track
>>381867Buddy, I'm the OP and I'm using a phone not a VPN. Have some more funny pics.
>>381869This whole post
except the uwu e_e>>381870This whole post
>>381871And not exclusively pic 2 have my sides aching every time I see them
No funny pics to share, so here's something from the fillies
>>382047The smoke alarm in the third picture looks like Gilbert Gottfried.
As a rule of thumb, dumb people think they’re smart. The lack of self-awareness is outstanding
>>382281>1st pic>marriageA reminder of the original meaning of the word.
Historically women were not emancipated from men's authority and marriage was a contract where a man could take factual possession of a vagina in exchange for comfort, goodies and protection.
Today that contract have been subverted and men don't own that vagina while women can't take all benefits backed by threats of violence by the State.
>the "I'm so oppressed because I can't beat and rape women like a nigger" boomer is back
>>382293It is not rape if you own her.
>>382293Rape was dealt with outside of the courts.
Wife beating was dealt with outside of the courts.
And then Theosophical Luciferianism and Leo Frank happened.
>>382293I found that meme, specially for (you).
>>382332>pic 3Pretty sure that's AI, which makes it sad for different reasons
>>382333>Pretty sure that's AIIt might be if we consider the theory that we are living in a simulation. Women are NPCs by default and sometimes the AI cannot make them perform in a credible way,
>>382334Look at the pieces. No chess set has that many of that many pieces
>>382335>ook at the pieces.I did and is totally credible that the woman has not the thinnest idea how to play chess.
>>382336theres 2 queens on each side
>>382337Yeah, you're right. Also 17 pieces on every side.
AI it is so.
>>382338Yes, but someone tried to post that for clout, and 30k people liked it
And its AI
>>382337It's because some modern chess boards come with two queens.
Why?
Pawn promotion.
>>382333>>382334>>382338The layout is not chess, but the point that there is two of every piece except the king points to the fact that this is a real person who set this up and took the picture.
The setup has the extra queen on the board.
t. Looked up chess boards and contents on online shops.If it was AI the fact it didn't fuck up any of the pieces or background by mixing and matching different sets/styles would have been neat.
[Read more]