297 replies and 563 files omitted.
Took me a minute.
If you want a quick rundown, examine the following image
>>380625So, the Flesh Plain would be somewhere in either the neck, the face, or the "hat"?
The "unbridled-ness" you mentioned makes me think of the idea of "intersections" in n-dimensional space.
>>380654You misunderstand the image, the shoulders is where the world begins
>>380655If the shoulders are where the world begins, and it's not a 101-course plane, then it would be in the later stages, wouldn't it? Are the neck and up meant to represent further on in the planeswalking journey?
>>380712>if the shoulders are where the world begins By the image, the moon appears first at the throat; wanna get into that?
Shoosh. Just look. And then come upon and look.
>>381013lol I was behind her in the registration line at Vanhoover.
>>381033Why did you not brutally rape her and then decapitate her?
>>381034Shutup Sandy (your name is Sandy now BTW), you know we >rape ponies here
>>381013If there's a horse that deserves to be punched, it's one of the ones that was trampling the people at Canada's Trucker protests the other year.
>>381043Wasn't his fault. He would have been put down if he hadn't. No trampled party blames the horse.
>>381051Not to be contentious, but how does one blame the hors when one is ded?
>>381779Are we gonna chase one another across the board? I thought we were gonna keep it nice.
>>381781Shh. No tears. Only puns now.
>>381786something something BUT IT WAS I, DIO
>>381792Stay in your containment thread.
>>381793Same.
Also the bread is censored. Just saying.
>>381795Though, I'm not here to start fights here so when I say agree with the censor thing, it's not meant that I dislike the people who has compromised the thread in way that is unfair. I do liked them a lot. This is just a thing they did wrong.
>>381794> Also the bread is censored. Just saying.The thread is not censored. It’s still in the catalog and you can still post in it. All that happened is that it hit bump limit. OP was butthurt because he wanted a new thread so he could continue his quest for endless dopamine, and mods told him no.
Okay, SOME of the horspussy
>>381814
Yes, OE OP said so, why mention it here, unless its desired to have a conversation about it?
>>381816
Maybe that's a topic for /qa/, instead of the humor thread.
>>381817If you think this is a topic that's going to be discussed on the board, it's possible but it won't be at your insistence
>>381816Nor yours. One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and now, but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. If your intent was to assert "hey, maybe post a little more this way" on the board - if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.
>>381818>if you don't know me "get fucked" means both "your opinion is rejected on it's face" and "that's absurd" - get fucked.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDB5gbtaEQ [Embed]>One wonders what you intended by bringing this up here and nowI brought it up because first OP made fun of the flat earth position. Then Boomboom, or whatever, said that he didn't think it was funny. Then someone told him to stay in his containment thread. I have to stop here, since obviously if you criticize something in a thread, then you invite hte opposition into that thread. Like, are we not allowed to disagree? But then he expressed how it was censored, which I sympathies with even if I might use a word like "compromised" instead, since otherwise it's gonna become a language debate instead:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON0tUATUeP8 [Embed]>but you lost alot of good will with me by doing so. Well, you have lost no good will, whoever you are, Anon with me. I think that you're probably a kind and smart person. I
just disagree, with the mods for how they handled the issue of that thread. However, that is all there is to it. A disagreement. I hold no grudge over this neither, or at least I don't think so, towards them. There is no reason for us to be in conflict.
[Read more] >>381820
<Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
So he brings it up one correct board for questions and answers, he will be smited? Or, maybe I'm interpenetrating this wrong? Seems like there's no place to really bring this up then.
>>381821Saging, but hoping this doesnt turn into more than it needs to, theres a rule in the rules about how mods interpret/enforce the rules, and they decided to bump lock the flat earth thread. They did so deliberately. This is not a question. Thats what /qa/ is for if other anon os foolish enough to press the matter.
I'm not staff, but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.
>>381823>but if he wants to pretend to not know why the flat earth thread is bumplocked, it may be consequential to him because he KNOWS why it is and probably knows what sort of behavior would be necessary to display if he has any hope of changing that reality.I guess this aims towards me.
Because I was banned maybe more than five or six times, slandered, and many more ugly things, I won't insist with the matter. I just restrain myself to get "my dopamine" by shitposting here and there and that's it.
If someday there is a new FlatEarth thread, it is fine with me, but I won't entertain anypony with debates.
>>381824Of course it was aimed at you, and no that's NOT why. For fucks sake this isn't /qa/ but it amuses me to slap the taste from your mouth so here we go!
The flat earth thread was bumplocked because its not a genuine thread that I and others have painstakingly illustrated over a long stretch of time. The flat earth thread is in fact a shitty facebook-tier meme thread for smooth brains who aren't willing to engage in discussion, and either are incapable of comprehending when they've been proven wrong, or Alex Stein wannabes who enjoy irritating intelligent people with complicated and seemingly "gotcha" questions that take time and effort to deconstruct.
In either case, the flat earth thread is enough of a waste of everyone's time and effort that an exception was made, and I say this having BEEN an exception for whom there is a rule.
For any further insipid questions, EITHER fuck off to /qa/ where someone in a position of authority is likely to smite your for acting in bad faith even though technically ban evading OR fuck off to the Mlpol welcome thread and read item 4, the choice is yours BoomBoom.
What? I found that exchange quite humorous
>>381816
>>381814
When Elway announced that there would be no new Flat Earth thread, it was because the thread had degenerated into a cesspool of flaming and drama.
All conversation in the thread had fallen into the following cycle:
1. Meme about a flat earth is posted
2. Someone gets offended by this and responds with an argument against it
3. Meme poster gives a non-reply that doesn’t address the core of the argument
4. Person replies calls out the non-argument
5. Meme poster replies with a new meme
6. Other guy gets even more upset at the non-reply
And it deteriorates further like a plane in a death spiral. By the time the thread was closed it was site-wide drama, and there was no sign at all that things were going to become better.
Then one of the flat earth posters described the thread as “shit posting,” which to me, indicated bad faith, and that was what convinced me that it needed to be shut down.
Anyways, this discussion doesn’t belong in this thread. It belongs on /qa/.
[Read more] So this is how Batman feels when Superman shows up
>>381828I don't agree with your description of the events nor do I agree with the idea that if a thread is generating drama, it needs to be dealt with. People fight all the time in every political thread on this site. Should they be compromised as well?
But yes, sorry. As made clear by context, it wasn't my intentions to bring this up. It grew organically. I won't continue posting in this thread about the subject matter from here on out. If I feel like it, I'll do it in a more relevant thread.
>>381831While one can argue degrees of specificity, the account is accurate; BoomBoom doesn't want to argue flat earthism, he just wants to smear it on the board and laugh while autists (such as myself) regail in the idea of not having to deal with such insolence.
Perhaps boomboom would feel more comfortable on "ourchan" they ban who anyone who calls the 5G nanobot vaxx posters "schizos." I'm sure they would love to have flat earthers like yourself.
>>381835Oh they were also talking about banning any mainstream news articles or scientific journals before I left. Nothing that could ever be used to prove you wrong. The perfect schizo safe space.
Boomboom, since THIS is the thread you chose, understand that no one is saying "Boomboom and/or flat eartherism is unwelcome" because that's not the case. Personally - and trust that I've been among your biggest critics - YOU ARE WANTED here,... but you have to give us credit where due when we make your arguments and memes look stupid
Which is every time, because dude, you're a flat earther, but lets not split hairs
>>381840Oh no! BoomBoom called me a nigger! This vexes me so!
Seriously, you chose this bringing it here. If I have lied, may somepony correct me.