Who should be allowed in the Ethnostate? My requirements would be as such:
>Greater than 3/4 European
>Less than 1/8 Jewish or Sub-Saharan African
I would use a genetics test to determine their ancestry. Is this too leniant, though?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
>>368886
Essentially this post.
>>368885
Arbitrarily preemptively making a litmus test would do more harm.
The point is being able to live with people you love you that you also love back.
While that criteria can influence the important factors as a short hand. I'd guess it'd be word of mouth for who would join.
I wouldn't be surprised of a confederacy or mutually friendly ethnostates/theocracy/ancap/whatever locations due to the brewing conflict(s).
Preemptive nation(s) building while a useful thought exercise also has to be extremely flexible and stable to handle the real life complexities and suprises reality can bring.
Essentially this post.
>>368885
Arbitrarily preemptively making a litmus test would do more harm.
The point is being able to live with people you love you that you also love back.
While that criteria can influence the important factors as a short hand. I'd guess it'd be word of mouth for who would join.
I wouldn't be surprised of a confederacy or mutually friendly ethnostates/theocracy/ancap/whatever locations due to the brewing conflict(s).
Preemptive nation(s) building while a useful thought exercise also has to be extremely flexible and stable to handle the real life complexities and suprises reality can bring.
>>368885
Ancestry trackers tend to be full of flaws when it comes to specificity. The lines they draw for what counts as "European" are often arbitrary, or only look at a handful of alleles. This results in cases where Ethiopians register as "European", even though they're quite clearly black.
This is because the companies that run them aren't actually interested in accurately tracking ancestry, but instead harvesting medical data to sell to private companies, domestic and abroad. China seems to be a big buyer if this medical data, which is why the US army prohibits military members from doing ancestry.com.
Hypothetically, benevolent actors could use genetics to track ancestry more reliably, but given lack of good precedent it's a flawed metric and shouldn't be the only factor for deciding who gets in.
Ancestry trackers tend to be full of flaws when it comes to specificity. The lines they draw for what counts as "European" are often arbitrary, or only look at a handful of alleles. This results in cases where Ethiopians register as "European", even though they're quite clearly black.
This is because the companies that run them aren't actually interested in accurately tracking ancestry, but instead harvesting medical data to sell to private companies, domestic and abroad. China seems to be a big buyer if this medical data, which is why the US army prohibits military members from doing ancestry.com.
Hypothetically, benevolent actors could use genetics to track ancestry more reliably, but given lack of good precedent it's a flawed metric and shouldn't be the only factor for deciding who gets in.
>>368885
Ponies should be allowed in the ethnostate. Humans on a case-by-case basis if they can prove that they're honorary equines.
Ponies should be allowed in the ethnostate. Humans on a case-by-case basis if they can prove that they're honorary equines.
>>368885
You can't just make the Ethnostate. It comes into being naturally. You make a new state out of ideology and the people who follow it. The new State would be the most ethnically diverse out there. There is no getting around it, and that's fine. We need an unapologetically goyish state first and foremost. The rest will come naturally. Nobody, without jewish influence, likes either kikes or niggers.
You can't just make the Ethnostate. It comes into being naturally. You make a new state out of ideology and the people who follow it. The new State would be the most ethnically diverse out there. There is no getting around it, and that's fine. We need an unapologetically goyish state first and foremost. The rest will come naturally. Nobody, without jewish influence, likes either kikes or niggers.
>>370524
>Nobody, without jewish influence, likes either kikes or niggers
Shills can play along with it, wait for the right moment to strike and subvert your non-jewish state (I'll refrain to use kike terms such as goyim) from within.
Only Ben Shapiro endorses the idea of an ideological state over an ethnic one.
Sure, ethno states aren't bulletproof either. But they are easier to manage and defend if you don't have niggers and other non-whites on the country. Less surface area to strike down upon.
>Nobody, without jewish influence, likes either kikes or niggers
Shills can play along with it, wait for the right moment to strike and subvert your non-jewish state (I'll refrain to use kike terms such as goyim) from within.
Only Ben Shapiro endorses the idea of an ideological state over an ethnic one.
Sure, ethno states aren't bulletproof either. But they are easier to manage and defend if you don't have niggers and other non-whites on the country. Less surface area to strike down upon.
You have to be an Aryan, or have Aryan features atleast. Even Hitler thought Nefertiti was an Aryan, suggesting that Hitler would of accepted atleast Egyptians or at the most Africans, but its a stipulation you must be Aryan.
7 replies | 5 files | 8 UUIDs | Archived