Who should be allowed in the Ethnostate? My requirements would be as such:
>Greater than 3/4 European
>Less than 1/8 Jewish or Sub-Saharan African
I would use a genetics test to determine their ancestry. Is this too leniant, though?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
File (): E53E44CF49CFFD9FAFDBE2FAEB554776-34072.jpg (33.3 KB, 454x582, Pony_Nazi.jpg)
>>368886
Essentially this post.
>>368885
Arbitrarily preemptively making a litmus test would do more harm.
The point is being able to live with people you love you that you also love back.
While that criteria can influence the important factors as a short hand. I'd guess it'd be word of mouth for who would join.
I wouldn't be surprised of a confederacy or mutually friendly ethnostates/theocracy/ancap/whatever locations due to the brewing conflict(s).
Preemptive nation(s) building while a useful thought exercise also has to be extremely flexible and stable to handle the real life complexities and suprises reality can bring.
Essentially this post.
>>368885
Arbitrarily preemptively making a litmus test would do more harm.
The point is being able to live with people you love you that you also love back.
While that criteria can influence the important factors as a short hand. I'd guess it'd be word of mouth for who would join.
I wouldn't be surprised of a confederacy or mutually friendly ethnostates/theocracy/ancap/whatever locations due to the brewing conflict(s).
Preemptive nation(s) building while a useful thought exercise also has to be extremely flexible and stable to handle the real life complexities and suprises reality can bring.
File (): 1C6A4ADF7DCFC6BAE7C2348134090648-320593.png (313.1 KB, 743x996, 1725300.png)
>>368885
Ancestry trackers tend to be full of flaws when it comes to specificity. The lines they draw for what counts as "European" are often arbitrary, or only look at a handful of alleles. This results in cases where Ethiopians register as "European", even though they're quite clearly black.
This is because the companies that run them aren't actually interested in accurately tracking ancestry, but instead harvesting medical data to sell to private companies, domestic and abroad. China seems to be a big buyer if this medical data, which is why the US army prohibits military members from doing ancestry.com.
Hypothetically, benevolent actors could use genetics to track ancestry more reliably, but given lack of good precedent it's a flawed metric and shouldn't be the only factor for deciding who gets in.
Ancestry trackers tend to be full of flaws when it comes to specificity. The lines they draw for what counts as "European" are often arbitrary, or only look at a handful of alleles. This results in cases where Ethiopians register as "European", even though they're quite clearly black.
This is because the companies that run them aren't actually interested in accurately tracking ancestry, but instead harvesting medical data to sell to private companies, domestic and abroad. China seems to be a big buyer if this medical data, which is why the US army prohibits military members from doing ancestry.com.
Hypothetically, benevolent actors could use genetics to track ancestry more reliably, but given lack of good precedent it's a flawed metric and shouldn't be the only factor for deciding who gets in.