I genuinely think we should give Black Americans their own country.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
File (): AD167651E15678F910AA08EDBCB9491F-76151.jpg (74.4 KB, 1280x581, republic_of_new_afrika_by_uniformpoet2303_de60kxn-fullview.jpg)
File (): 76F1219CBEE4A41B472D89599639F530-4540806.mp4 (4.3 MB, Resolution:1234x720 Length:00:00:22, videoplayback.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>359542
As long as part of the deal is that all blacks have to go there and can't come back, I'm okay with this. However, I think instead of the south we should just give them California and as a bonus throw in all the leftoids to be their slaves. Then we just wall the place off for a couple of decades and then reclaim it when everyone inside is dead.
As long as part of the deal is that all blacks have to go there and can't come back, I'm okay with this. However, I think instead of the south we should just give them California and as a bonus throw in all the leftoids to be their slaves. Then we just wall the place off for a couple of decades and then reclaim it when everyone inside is dead.
File (): 8CDFF5FAF2FF6FCEF05A90ACFA1DF285-544318.png (531.6 KB, 640x626, fuckin.png)
Friend, don't be silly, they have an entire continent. Why sacrifice valuable Lebensraum?
File (): 4E0052A24FE21966103E4471C1EFE53E-41364.jpg (40.4 KB, 476x599, Murray_Rothbard_1.jpg)
(((Rothbard))) already addressed this proposal pretty well.
>There is no question that black nationalism is a lot more libertarian than the compulsory integration pushed by King, the NAACP, and white liberals. But there are deep problems with black nationalism, which Malcolm never had a chance to explore. The most fundamental: black nationalism in what territory? A nation has to have territory, and blacks are only one-fifth of the American nation. “Black nationalism” within the United States is then only a phony nationalism, and beginning to look like a drive for an aggravated form of coerced parasitism over the white population. The territorial question was at least faced by the Black Belt thesis of the Communist Party of the USA during the 1920s: Black Belt slave counties of the South. There were two grave problems with this doctrine: (a) what do you do with the existing usually majority white population in these areas, and (b) as time has gone on since 1865, more and more blacks have moved out of the historic Black Belt, and have taken over various inner cities in the North.
>A second, and more plausible, form of black nationalism is for a separate black nation in currently existing black areas: a New Africa comprised of Harlem, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Detroit, Watts, et al. with its capital the old Washington, D.C., and President Jesse Jackson sitting in the Black House. But then more problems arise. Apart from all the problems of enclaves and access, does anyone really believe that this New Africa would be content to strike out on its own, with no massive “foreign aid” from the U.S.A., and strictly limited migration between the two nations? In a pig’s eye.
>Actually, since Malcolm’s preferred term was “African-American” and since this word has now become the PC moniker, it would make the most sense to adopt the solution of early twentieth-century black leader, Marcus Garvey: a mass exodus, a return to West Africa, there to carve out a new black nation, as a people’s exile from the Old Sod is at last redeemed. It is true that in contrast to voluntary immigration, black migration from Africa to America was coerced, and voluntary black “Zionism” or African repatriation was the preferred solution to the black problem for most groups, North and South, before the Civil War. Even now, I bet that many Americans would cheerfully chip in to support such a crusade. But why am I convinced that such a Back to Africa solution, even though it would offer a permanent escape from the alleged horrors of White Racism, is not going to fly, especially among those who aggressively like to refer to themselves as “African-American”?
TLDR
>Niggers can't have a country without gibs
>White people would be happy to help them pack their shit and leave
>They never will though
>There is no question that black nationalism is a lot more libertarian than the compulsory integration pushed by King, the NAACP, and white liberals. But there are deep problems with black nationalism, which Malcolm never had a chance to explore. The most fundamental: black nationalism in what territory? A nation has to have territory, and blacks are only one-fifth of the American nation. “Black nationalism” within the United States is then only a phony nationalism, and beginning to look like a drive for an aggravated form of coerced parasitism over the white population. The territorial question was at least faced by the Black Belt thesis of the Communist Party of the USA during the 1920s: Black Belt slave counties of the South. There were two grave problems with this doctrine: (a) what do you do with the existing usually majority white population in these areas, and (b) as time has gone on since 1865, more and more blacks have moved out of the historic Black Belt, and have taken over various inner cities in the North.
>A second, and more plausible, form of black nationalism is for a separate black nation in currently existing black areas: a New Africa comprised of Harlem, Bedford-Stuyvesant, Detroit, Watts, et al. with its capital the old Washington, D.C., and President Jesse Jackson sitting in the Black House. But then more problems arise. Apart from all the problems of enclaves and access, does anyone really believe that this New Africa would be content to strike out on its own, with no massive “foreign aid” from the U.S.A., and strictly limited migration between the two nations? In a pig’s eye.
>Actually, since Malcolm’s preferred term was “African-American” and since this word has now become the PC moniker, it would make the most sense to adopt the solution of early twentieth-century black leader, Marcus Garvey: a mass exodus, a return to West Africa, there to carve out a new black nation, as a people’s exile from the Old Sod is at last redeemed. It is true that in contrast to voluntary immigration, black migration from Africa to America was coerced, and voluntary black “Zionism” or African repatriation was the preferred solution to the black problem for most groups, North and South, before the Civil War. Even now, I bet that many Americans would cheerfully chip in to support such a crusade. But why am I convinced that such a Back to Africa solution, even though it would offer a permanent escape from the alleged horrors of White Racism, is not going to fly, especially among those who aggressively like to refer to themselves as “African-American”?
TLDR
>Niggers can't have a country without gibs
>White people would be happy to help them pack their shit and leave
>They never will though
File (): 44E7A9A0A850AD3DC085D0CFCECD7523-17878.jpg (17.5 KB, 800x416, Flag-Liberia.jpg)
>>359542 We already did that. Black Americans are welcome to move there.
>>359548
Unlike Liberia, Southern US would have industry, possibly making it maybe Botswana tier if nigs know how to run it.
Unlike Liberia, Southern US would have industry, possibly making it maybe Botswana tier if nigs know how to run it.
File (): 8F8638793E7133B7FFAF51618521C135-137311.jpg (134.1 KB, 900x864, What if black people....jpg)
We've done enough testing. The African is a failed experiment. Move on.
the best way to remove them is stop importing them.
the black population would be roughly 10 million less than it is today if wasn't for black immigrants and their children.
a minor white pill
https://archive.is/DyNs7
another minor white pill.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2022/05/13/multiracial-residents-are-changing-the-face-of-the-us
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWjGteDg9VE
the black population would be roughly 10 million less than it is today if wasn't for black immigrants and their children.
a minor white pill
https://archive.is/DyNs7
another minor white pill.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2022/05/13/multiracial-residents-are-changing-the-face-of-the-us
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWjGteDg9VE
>>359542
A very distasteful subject and it is missing the mark for getting started.
Even if there is mutual consensus for separation, there is a historical third party called government interested in keeping all ethnic groups mixed and paralyzed. The current implications are obvious and its evolution too.
Another horny edge is that niggers are not the main demographic problem today but the conglomerate of all aliens brought to America to ethnic cleanse the Europeans. Niggers are a safety problem and cub sacrifice has kept their numbers more or less in check.
A very distasteful subject and it is missing the mark for getting started.
Even if there is mutual consensus for separation, there is a historical third party called government interested in keeping all ethnic groups mixed and paralyzed. The current implications are obvious and its evolution too.
Another horny edge is that niggers are not the main demographic problem today but the conglomerate of all aliens brought to America to ethnic cleanse the Europeans. Niggers are a safety problem and cub sacrifice has kept their numbers more or less in check.