There is not a good answer to that as what is good or what is bad is in the eye of the beholder.
I would say Hoppeanism, or Minarchism.
The thing is, I doubt that any form of anarchism can achieve the unification of it's people under one Ideal, meaning I doubt any form of Anarchism would be stable. Yet it is the best we could strive for.
ancapism is not anarchist because it still supports many forms of hierarchy, one of them being the boss-worker relation. It's proposed society would just be a private government, far from anarchism
Call me a retarded nigger, but how do you abolish any form of hierarchy? That's the thing with "TRVE Anarchists": They don't seem to understand that anything in this world is build inherently on hierarchies.
So in the end an absents of hierarchy is an idealism and as I see it: Anarcho-Capitalism is near enough to be counted in the broader spectrum of it (hence the Anarcho-)
So yeah, if you only let "TRVE Anarchism" count, I would say going with Stirner seems to be alright.
Left-wing anarchism is delusional. You can't abolish all forms of hierarchy.
You will never make everyone equally tall, or equally strong, or equally smart.
True anarchy (anarcho-capitalism) means a total lack of coercion.
>>359611>You will never make everyone equally tall, or equally strong, or equally smart.
what about transhumanism?
You may need a dictionary fren.
This is a non-argument, tbh. Could you further the point about why you think it's bad?
It means that you just blew the snownigger's argument out of the water.
With the same criteria you might be explaining why transhumanism is good and how applies to anarchism.
After all it was you who brought it to this thread.
>>359633>explaining why transhumanism is good
I'm indifferent to it.>how applies to anarchism
Beats me; probably some tranny meme. I guess it could make people more "equal" by eliminating hereditary disabilities and retardation.>it was you who brought it to this thread
Where are you getting that?
If you're no White, what you are and what you're doing here, fren?
>>359635>Where are you getting that?
I'm sensing samefagging tbh.
Oh fuck off, nigger. Does it really bamboozle you so much that two people might post to the same stupid thread?
Just tell me what your actual argument is before I lose interest.
Reminder that if (you) sage
, noponer will know there is a new post.
Your ancestors lived in nigger mud huts for much of their history.>Claims samefagging>Hides flag
You want to make every human genetically identical to justify communism?
What about other intelligent animals? If we can make niggers as intelligent as humans, then surely we can make chimpanzees that smart too?
Where does it end?
Making more intelligent by fusion Animal and Human DNA together.
If I could get my Fox-Girl-Utopia, justifying Communism would become pretty easy.
>>359690>If I could get my Fox-Girl-Utopia, justifying Communism would become pretty easy.>Fox-Girl
That's it. Furry alert.
You are totally psychotic.
>>359691>You are totally psychotic
Labels label me not. As long as I'm owner of my psychosis, (cause it pleases me,) I'm in fact not; psychotic.
Back to your nuthouse degenerate.
Getting rid of capitalism and the state>>359603>the contradiction between second and third pic
>>359904>Getting rid of capitalism and the state
Read what I wrote Braziloid.
How do you abolish Hierarchy if Hierarchies are everywhere in nature? Getting rid of capitalism will make way for the forming of new Hierarchies of the Socialist/Solidarity Society. If you get rid of the state people will form new systems: Tribes, Gangs etc.
Anarchism is a Utopia, AnCaps have atleast enough brain to see that.