What is the definition of "the system"? what are it's core elements and attributes? right wing anarchists define the state as a system of public institutions rather than private ones (requiring abolition of government), left wing anarchists define the state as a combination of military, police and sovereignty (requiring aboliton of elements defined as state, but retaining government). and of course Pierce is referring to neither, since he's talking about The System rather than The State, but I'm confused as to the difference. does the system exist independently of the state? what elements specifically constitute it? I looked into it, but most of what I could find was about the media being the most powerful influence as opposed to military and industry, but surely The System can't just be the media? how would Piece have defined "the system", and what other definitions of it are there from similar perspectives? I'm curious.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): FF039342B8542FA731331D0798DB26B3-811343.png (792.3 KB, 1468x7317, 1631314537756.png)
File (): 30F0945227E875F662D0997E135BFA72-904611.png (883.4 KB, 1837x1728, wbculf.png)
The System is a collection of intelligence contractors and PR agencies who are all whores working for the highest bidder at any given moment. They were trained up that way by the Rothschilds, and they all collectively sold out to the Russians, Muslims, and Chinese.
Core attributes are:
* Adherence to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Not even today's Russia, but the USSR propaganda of the 1970s that all of these middle aged communists grew up on.
* Support for Islam, for listed Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas, and for censoring any opponents of Islam. Because it's the Muslims paying for this.
* Doing business with foreign powers. In other words, taking payoffs.
* Being funded by George Soros. He launders all of their money.
* Being members of the CFR.
See >>260831 → for signs of the Muslim takeover of the System.
Core attributes are:
* Adherence to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Not even today's Russia, but the USSR propaganda of the 1970s that all of these middle aged communists grew up on.
* Support for Islam, for listed Islamic terrorist groups like Hamas, and for censoring any opponents of Islam. Because it's the Muslims paying for this.
* Doing business with foreign powers. In other words, taking payoffs.
* Being funded by George Soros. He launders all of their money.
* Being members of the CFR.
See >>260831 → for signs of the Muslim takeover of the System.
>>321294
No don't
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/10-reasons-not-peace.aspx
also The System doesn't work for "the highest bidder", it works for the jews.
No don't
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/10-reasons-not-peace.aspx
also The System doesn't work for "the highest bidder", it works for the jews.
>>321335
I looked at your site, here's what I noticed
>Lists 9/11 as an Islamic attack
>Complains about muslim antisemitism
>Openly praises Israel
>Openly praises Jews and Judaism
>Has dozens of authors with incredibly Jewish names
>Endorses JihadWatch - a site owned by a Jew and founded by a Jewish organization
I wonder who could be behind this site!
I looked at your site, here's what I noticed
>Lists 9/11 as an Islamic attack
>Complains about muslim antisemitism
>Openly praises Israel
>Openly praises Jews and Judaism
>Has dozens of authors with incredibly Jewish names
>Endorses JihadWatch - a site owned by a Jew and founded by a Jewish organization
I wonder who could be behind this site!
>>321347
Following the unilateral withdrawal of Israeli security forces in 2005, no one can claim that the Gaza Strip is "occupied territory." This still hasn't stopped the usual critics from making other accusations about the misery of the people there, such as charging that the Palestinians are "under siege" from Israel and starving as a consequence.
In fact, the only siege that the people of Gaza are under is what they bring on themselves. Their government uses donated humanitarian aid to smuggle rockets which are then fired into Israeli population centers. When this fails to provoke Israel into conflict, Palestinian terrorists cross the border and attempt to kidnap or kill Israelis in their own land.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/Life-in-Gaza.htm
Following the unilateral withdrawal of Israeli security forces in 2005, no one can claim that the Gaza Strip is "occupied territory." This still hasn't stopped the usual critics from making other accusations about the misery of the people there, such as charging that the Palestinians are "under siege" from Israel and starving as a consequence.
In fact, the only siege that the people of Gaza are under is what they bring on themselves. Their government uses donated humanitarian aid to smuggle rockets which are then fired into Israeli population centers. When this fails to provoke Israel into conflict, Palestinian terrorists cross the border and attempt to kidnap or kill Israelis in their own land.
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/Life-in-Gaza.htm
File (): 7DEBD1149F4D12C9A61E964328671CAD-81734.png (79.8 KB, 231x247, Screenshot from 2021-10-03 18-45-22.png)
File (): 453C1E2FC3173F686B3475C0CFBD70D4-6912.png (6.8 KB, 204x67, Screenshot from 2021-10-03 18-47-11.png)
>>321352
And according to a report, JIDF members regularly linked TheReligionofPeace.com in propaganda efforts --> https://archive.is/sQYf (article in German)
And according to a report, JIDF members regularly linked TheReligionofPeace.com in propaganda efforts --> https://archive.is/sQYf (article in German)
>>321352
(((Reparations))) are a Jewish invention. Only a Jew will send a bill to somebody who lost a war or emancipated them from oppression.
(((Reparations))) are a Jewish invention. Only a Jew will send a bill to somebody who lost a war or emancipated them from oppression.
"The system" (in anglo nations) is essentially imperial representative-democratic liberal capitalism and the industries and governance that comprise it. Technically it's a constitutional monarchy too but who gives a fuck.
The imperial liberal capitalist system determines how the media and other industries work (exploitation to optimize short-term profit), how the government legislates (to attempt to regulate business while keeping it privately owned, lobbying), how the state police are used (to protect important capital interests) and how the military is used (to protect important capital interests, see oil invasions, south american coups)
It's overly simplistic to think there is one single major component in a system. It's a system of competing interests.
The imperial liberal capitalist system determines how the media and other industries work (exploitation to optimize short-term profit), how the government legislates (to attempt to regulate business while keeping it privately owned, lobbying), how the state police are used (to protect important capital interests) and how the military is used (to protect important capital interests, see oil invasions, south american coups)
It's overly simplistic to think there is one single major component in a system. It's a system of competing interests.
>>321335
>islam's not a religion of peace
this isn't a website of peace, or a discussion of peace. indeed it's almost the exact opposite of that.
>point ten is literally that the 9/11 bombers said "god is great"
yeah and crusaders said "deus vult", the fuck if your point? "hurr murder is bad" yeah wrong fucking site for that bud
>>321361
right, but see that makes no sense from Turner's perspective. he describes and predicts a takeover by communists in the diaries, which would entail an abolition of all of the things you just described. it feels like he uses it to just mean "what I don't like", which seems to hold for the lemming idea in the OP too. it's frustrating that he never clearly defined even the most basic terms in his ideas and writings, I think he may have been retarded. it's not hard to just take a quick chapter to discuss what you mean by what you're fucking saying, but ohhhh no, we needed more pages of dull engineering details and inaccurate sex. fucking riveting. why did anyone take this elderly chucklefuck even remotely seriously?
>islam's not a religion of peace
this isn't a website of peace, or a discussion of peace. indeed it's almost the exact opposite of that.
>point ten is literally that the 9/11 bombers said "god is great"
yeah and crusaders said "deus vult", the fuck if your point? "hurr murder is bad" yeah wrong fucking site for that bud
>>321361
right, but see that makes no sense from Turner's perspective. he describes and predicts a takeover by communists in the diaries, which would entail an abolition of all of the things you just described. it feels like he uses it to just mean "what I don't like", which seems to hold for the lemming idea in the OP too. it's frustrating that he never clearly defined even the most basic terms in his ideas and writings, I think he may have been retarded. it's not hard to just take a quick chapter to discuss what you mean by what you're fucking saying, but ohhhh no, we needed more pages of dull engineering details and inaccurate sex. fucking riveting. why did anyone take this elderly chucklefuck even remotely seriously?
15 replies | 4 files | 7 UUIDs | Archived