/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>297651
>went well
I give it a meh/10
Soyjack only does this shit as a vane/vein attempt to appear relevant and try to garner attention. By raiding them, you're giving then what they want.

>>297661
This
It would be best to ignore them

>>297661
Pretty much this.

>>297651
bunkerchan sounds like fun

>>297670
Yeah we should raid them, maybe tomorrow? We should spam real horse porn, that will scare them lol.

>>297670
>>297676
Let's not.

Bunkerchan outnumbers us and we don't want to attract attention right now.

>>297676
>real horse porn
but where would we find such a thing?

>>297686
>>297687
we will be fine
>>297688
https://zooxhamster.com/search/Mare//

>>297687
I'm reasonably sure they visit here anyway. And we can always just call backup from /pol/, attracting the shills as well - to bunkerchan. Imagine the clusterfuck.
And why don't we want to attract attention again? I'm not fully sold on raids, but also don't see how attracting and redpilling actual users would be bad. That's the whole point of having a site like this, no? To spread truth, and have a place to discuss it?

>>297690
Actually disregard my previous post. You are right. They already know we exist we might as well have some fun. Here use these images in your raid.

>>297692
Based, but also post horse porn. both real and fake.

So it seems like a lot of people want to raid bunkertran, so when should we raid them? I thInk tomorrow at 11 AM EST.

>>297693
this, I can't get the site in >>297689 to load so I can't pull form there

>>297692
I was on the fence about the idea but you proceeded to convince me while convincing yourself.
>>297695
I think a general "tomorrow" works just fine. Different time zones and shit, and everyone gets to take part at their leisure. Spread it out enough and we get to annoy them for a whole day.

>>297697
I think this one should work.
https://en.luxuretv.com/searchgate/videos/mare/
>>297698
Yeah that's a good idea, any other considerations?

The leaf's first post was to link the offending site. Follow his driven initiative at your peril.

>>297700
I guess we should also ask whether you are fine with having the potential backlash from the bunkerfags, now that you are here.

Anons, there's plenty of cancer on the board already and plenty of happenings to boot. Using horsepron is commonly accepted as a defensive tactic. Lots of anons yesterday were saying 4/pol/ is too hot to troll for newfags too. FWIW I wouldn't condone this type of activity, especially right now.

>>297703
Soyjak already raided us. Bad actors know where we are. It's not like we can hide forever. I doubt fucking with bunkerchan is going to change our odds of being shut down one way for the other. We may as well have some fun with it.

>>297703
Some anon a couple months ago advertised us on 4chan, newfags already know who we are.

>>297706
Don't let me stop you. I just have a bit of a bad feeling about it. Bunkerchan anyway, soyjak looked like it had 2 replies per thread.

>>297707
Not all of them. There was a thread with an image of Trump fucking Fluttershy at the start and someone said they missed /mlpol/ about 10 posts into it just before it got nuked. But like I said, if you want to do it, there's nothing stopping you.

>>297701
Anon, please

>>297700
>>297701
>>297706
>>297708
>>297710
Somebody mind telling this retard why it would be a bad idea to raid bunkerchan?

>>297712
It's not a bad idea. The objection is following some-nigger's proposed schedule, especially just after the strike.
A wiser response would be after all surveillance had become lax, when nothing was anticipated. Sure, the counter raid was good, but it was expected; their board knew they were acting, and that there would be a reaction. They were quite prepared for the response.
Counter-raids allow soy to feel as though it is relevant. Please dont feed the trolls.
Kill them silently and with surprise.

test

>>297714
Okay, so is bunkerchan expecting us? It doesn't seem like it.
The only actual counter-argument I can think of is that their site is barely holding itself together as-is and has problems answering basic requests when simply just browsing, and so the experience of actually spamming anything in there might be slow and jarring. But that's about it.

>>297716
>Okay, so is bunkerchan expecting us? It doesn't seem like it.
Don't be naive.
They are. There are plenty of commie lurkers around. And my pony senses are telling me that it's a bad move.

>>297717
Nothing bad is gonna happen, the mods are pretty active here so any retaliation will be swiftly deal with.

>>297720
For fuck's sake leaf, your grammar was correct the first time around.

>>297718
I trust my pony senses. I'll pass, sorry.

>>297717
>pic related
Wait until there arent lurkers trying for screencaps and intel. I'm up for raiding both, but by surprise

>>297724
>Wait until there arent lurkers
How could we possibly know that?

>>297725
How much autism would you put toward monitoring a nazi horseracing moon whispering basket-holding site?

>>297729
I don't know, I post here.
But if you are implying that the amount of retardation determines how long commie fags from leftypol will be watching this site, then there will not be a time when they won't be around anyway.
But logic dictates that the more time that passes with this thread visible, the more likely it is that they will become aware. So honestly feels like tomorrow is a better time than any other that comes later in the foreseeable future.

>>297732
You wanna know why tomorrow is a bad idea? Because you said tomorrow.
I guarantee theres still 1 autism monitoring for a reaction and/or salt. It's what I've done during previous strikes against others, and what should be expected from soy, who will gladly (probably already have) relayed any thought about bunkerchan.
Give it a week. Find something readily participated in. A gathering of sorts. And maybe make some raid plans while enjoying old movies.

>>297737
>Because you said tomorrow.
The leaf who proposed the idea said tomorrow. Everyone who agreed, agreed to tomorrow. Don't base a whole argument upon my post.
But now you said "give it a week". Is a "within a week" also a bad idea now, going by the same logic?

>>297738
>going by the same logic?
There's no logic fren, just tingling senses.
It's not the time.

>>297739
Actually, that's fair. But if the leaf or some other anon from above starts it off, it's going to happen anyway. We'll see how that turns out.

Been on 4cucks, fuck it i am posting scat horseporn on bunkercucks tommorow.

Does anyone need weaponized autism? Maybe a goatse nuke? Some Lemon Party for the N00bs.

Also spam gore and epileptic shit like party hard(pony hard) and watch as they flop around on the floor also. Like I will ROFL.

>>298171
We've got enough.

>>298173
>>298173
>>298173
You can never have enough weaponized autism. https://youtu.be/zusLgd9L04Y

>>298175
>video
>holy pinkamena
That tops everything.

>>298176
The secreeet is to get them to flopping around like after watching an episode of pokemon

Jannies are asleep in case anyone wants to go get some newfags real fast:
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/305104602

>>299717
LOL, let's go and post ponies.

>>299717
>>299718
The thread was deleted.
It was fun, a good one.

>>299719
Yep. Impressive.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/305104602

>>299718
Wow, that was a lot of replies! Got 404'd just as I wanted to post

>>299721
I think someone mentioned this board in it, looks like lots of anons still like ponies...