/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

I'd be salt-posting en mass right now, but the new update disabled hotlinks... e_e

>>282947
Finally. She should have retired years ago but she lacked the honor to do so.

I knew she'd die right before the election.

>>282952
It is amazing none of these leftist knew she was deadly ill. They really have no clue what reality looks like.

REALLY missing the hotlinks now...

What are the chances that Cocaine Mitch just takes a massive dump on the Democrats with his senate majority?

>>282955
>>282958
Somehow video got fucked and disappeared just like RGB.

Thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPIdRJlzERo

>>282947
Awesome.

>The Senate and the nation mourn the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the conclusion of her extraordinary American life.
https://twitter.com/senatemajldr/status/1307121192516628480

...
>President Trump's nominee will receive a vote on the floor of the United States Senate.

>>282992
The salt from this decision is going to be enough to tide me over until Christmas, holy shit

The Turtle has spoken.

>>282999
Good. Now I only hope that one of the other senators aside from Murkowski, Collins and Mittens doesn't shy away from the vote. Pence can cast the 51st vote if needed.

Wait, it looks like Romney might just stab us in the back again.

Press "S" to spit on grave

>>283008
S

>>283002
It does strike me as hypocritical to push a justice nominee through so close to the election compared to previous election seasons postponing the appointment until after the inauguration. BUT if the roles were reversed I know that the left would happily kill me and dump my body in ditch. So fuck them.

>>283010
There is literally no reason to be upset about politicians being hypocritical if it's a net positive. Democracy is a joke anyways.

>>283011
Get out of my head Hyde. You can't keep getting with it.

>>283011
>>283012
Before I take my schizo meds, do you think that they killed her? Combined with a push to postpone the replacement justice until after the election, I could see them killing her as part of a "get out the vote" plan to motivate democrats to vote in the election.

I don't have any proof of this, but I feel like they're dirty enough to sink that low.

>>283016
I doubt it. They wouldn't risk a republican SCOTUS judge. A 6-3 republican SCOTUS will say no to all their election manipulation bullshit that they are going to pull this year.

>>283016
>Before I take my schizo meds, do you think that they killed her?
Nah, she has been on death bed awaiting death (or retirement) for years. She didn't have long to live and was planning to retire next year anyway (due to heath). She was just trying to hang on so Trump would not replace her (hoping he didn't get reelected). It was basically a waiting game where she hoped she would not succumb to her illness before the election.

>>283019
Leftists turning to terrorism to get their will yet again. Color me unsurprised.

>Admin doing the cucked mayors and govs jobs at killing riots
>Antifa getting btfo on Pixilcanvas
>Now this
Today's a good day

>>283023
And it just got even better!

>>282950
i feel cringe for liking the show he plays in now.

>>282956
>This fucking monstrous fascists
Oh, well.

>>283028
Gonna celebrate with some goat cheese, garlic/parsley crackers and spice apple pie wine.

>>283029
I don't recognize the face or name but I remember Misha. Is he from that gay tumblr superwholock show? "Whitley's the king of hell and all he can say is balls".

>We are one vote away from losing our fundamental constitutional liberties. I believe
@realDonaldTrump should nominate a successor next week and the Senate should take up and confirm that successor before Election Day.

https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/1307145931243089926

>>283035
Based Ted.

>>282999
>trips
Check'em.

>>283035
>>283037
He does make a good point that a 4-4 court would be the recipe for a major shitshow in the event of a contested election.

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283032
Yea he plays in supernatural.
>>283008
SS

>>283047
They have already started eating each other Topkek

>>283047
Native Americans aren't the only people to use war paint. It was prominent in Europe, Asia and Africa too.

>>283019
Well, this is more than enough for incitement to insurrection and terrorism.

Heres my Favorite one

>>283008
S

>>282947
Excellent thread OP.
A lot of fun.

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283008
S

>>283064
Based Ancap.

Loads of salt. Ginsburg has outlived her usefulness to them.

>>283008
S

>>283066
Her body must have been disintegrating faster than they could have patched her up. Besides, it's not like she was doing any of the ruling herself, it was all of her clerks getting orders from others.

>>283070
>Besides, it's not like she was doing any of the ruling herself, it was all of her clerks getting orders from others
This is the most obvious and most dismissed truth. They're all zog pawns and another cog in the kike machine.
There's no way an independent mind and patriot judge would be appointed for this key position.

>>282947
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/278163019#p278166666
Biden is ded

Thread Theme
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7d6acg_ylVg

>>283078
>Is there a world in which we end up with federally mandated rape?
We already have that, it's called "taxes."

Wonderful to wake up to read all the salt posts. And I know we will have days and weeks of more salt mining coming.

>>283020
I think it's more likely that she died earlier and they're wheeling her out now. Ostensibly it would have prevented Trump from replacing her "before the election" so dems can try and use scotus as a rallying cry for Biden (lol) in the same way it was for Trump in '16 (and also a jab at Mitch for blocking Garland).
Which will make the chimp out after the election that much more massive/intense

>>283090
I agree. It is much more likely her death was kept secret for a (long) while rather than they taking her out.

>>283105
Shitposter In Chief

>>283008
BaSed.
>>283075
>4th image
Biden is gonna get 360 no scoped on stage.

Funny how of all days she could have died it was the 19th the reaper decided her time was up.

>>283023
Lol, even when pony lay at its weakest they're no match

>>283124
We still have work to be done, so join in and help out if you can.

https://pixelcanvas.io/@-1501,1063

>>283124
>>283125
Niggers, this is SO not the thread for that

So, you think she'll really be replaced before the election?

>>283131
>So, you think she'll really be replaced before the election?
Unless four Republicans in the Senate cucks out I think so. If three cucks out and votes against or abstain Pence can still make the important tiebreaker vote and get it to 51 and an confirmation.

>>283131
The only way my expectations of Republicans could sink any lower is if she isn't

>>283133
This. If they don't they are complete idiots.

How do you think this absolute shitstorm will effect the November election?

>>283136
If the Republicans do the right thing and confirm a replacement for RBG it might take some of the air out of the Democrats. The only platform they can run on is stacking the court and I don't think that is a good message to run on.
If the Republicans don't replace RBG with a new judge the election will be a total shitstorm I think. The entire election will be about who will replace RBG, and all results will be contested (like they will be anyway). The SCOTUS will not be able to make any judgments on the lawsuits when they come before them as it will end up in a 4-4 split. I am frankly not sure what the end outcome will be if RBG isn't replaced.

>>283137
Yeah, Democrats will cry hypocrite, but replacing her asap is really the best option for the country.

>>283132
>Unless four Republicans in the Senate cucks out I think so.
Never underestimate the republicans to cuck out. There's already 2-3 on record as against it.

>>283137
Trump needs to replace RBG with a puppet who will do whatever he says. That's what's best for Trump.
Putting a literal hitler willing to hide his power level (for now) would be best for us.
Knowing Trump, he'll insist on hiring a woman to "totally own teh libs" and she'll betray him wherever possible as thanks.

>>283142
That is the scary part. I hope they have learned that the democrats will never play fair, and that the only right thing to do is to stop pandering to them. I hope the impeachment nonsense and all the shit the Dems have done these past three years have sunk in and that those Republicans have learned and is able to see the truth.

>>283137
He'll pick someone honourable and fair like Kavanaugh and watch as the democrats try to destroy their character to keep them out, turning the pick into a conservative with a bone to pick with the democrats. You know, like they did with Thomas.

>>283132
>Unless four Republicans in the Senate cucks out
I bet 100 bits they will.
The GOP is bought and handled by the same kikes and do as told. To keep the illusion of confusion, unrest, anarchy and incompetence, is part of the grand act to bring the military on the streets and to be welcomed by the lemmings with open arms. After all, if a seamless transition to a cashless totalitarian technocracy is wanted, to suppress, tag, and disarm the dissenters is a must.

>>283145
>that the democrats will never play fair, and that the only right thing to do is to stop pandering to them
They won't play fair, and they will use our own honor against us. Happens every time.

>>283147
>He'll pick someone honourable and fair like Kavanaugh and watch as the democrats try to destroy their character to keep them out
It will be a woman, if only to stop the pathetic fake "rape victims"/"sexual harrassment victims", etc, from coming out of the woodwork.

I really hope he doesn't pick barret with her nog children. That's not who we need. They are pumping the shit out of barret on TDW. We need someone strong on immigration, and it isn't her.

>>283149
>I bet 100 bits they will.
Fug, I hope not, but I'm giving it even odds at this point.

>>283150
>if only to stop the pathetic fake "rape victims"/"sexual harrassment victims", etc, from coming out of the woodwork.
They could still do that. Try to paint her as an child abusing sexual aggressor towards both boys and girls.

>TRUMP: "I will be putting forth the nominee next week.
>It will be a woman!"
https://twitter.com/PrayingActress/status/1307460041209982980
Absolutely disgusting. This is progressivism parading as conservatism. I wanna vomit.

>>283155
Typical. Like Rothbard said in his great essay Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, the right has always surrendered the moral high ground to the egalitarian left, arguing in their terms and playing by the rules they set, saying "We're the real party of equality/diversity/inclusivity et cetera". And playing a game where your enemy sets the rules is an idiot's errand.
>This is progressivism parading as conservatism
At the end of the day, the latter is just the former driving the speed limit.

>>283155
>>283156
It is true it is pandering to the rules of the left instead of meritocracy. But I think Trump did that so just to make it hard for the Dems to claim the pick is a rapist etc. But the Dems will bitch an moan of it being a pick made "before an election". But that argument can be used every 2 years since Senate majority can change every 2 years and therefor a confirmation is dependent on the outcome of every election. But at least we don't have to hear about how the pick is a rapists. Bonus points if the pick is someone Biden have inappropriate sniffed the hair of in the past.

>>283168
>It is true it is pandering to the rules of the left instead of meritocracy
At every turn he is partaking with the enemy instead of to crush it. MAGA is not this shit.

Thr salt continues to flow, let's see how far they go as the days progress onwards

>>283170
How delusional do you have to be to treat the death of this bitch like we just learned that the sun isn't going to rise tomorrow?

>>283175
It gets better when you learn that none of these people even knew who the hell she was 4 years ago.

>>283155
https://infogalactic.com/info/Amy_Coney_Barrett
> Described as an "originalist" and a "textualist," Barrett's judicial philosophy has been likened to that of her mentor and former boss, Antonin Scalia. Barrett's scholarship focuses on originalism, statutory interpretation, and stare decisis.
I fail to see the issue.

>>283176
The most that I know about the hag is that she was in favor of RvW (Which is why she's so "important"), however that was only for the initial trial back in the 80's. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE (Even RGB), involved with the trial have expressed a huge regret over the decision of it, and would give the exact opposite ruling if they did it over again or someone brought a similar issue to trial.

>>283155
Not really. He already had a list of people who he would appoint, he appointed two people off of that list and one person passed up both times just happens to be a woman. Appointing the woman who was at the top of his appointment list anyways (Amy Barrett) will prevent leftists from bitching about a Trump only appointing white males, and it will completely block off the “me too” line of attack they tried so desperately on Kavanaugh.

>>283143
>Knowing Trump, he'll insist on hiring a woman to "totally own teh libs" and she'll betray him wherever possible as thanks.
I'm not fond of the idea, but strategically it makes sense to pick a woman. It's not so much about "owning teh libs" as it is giving them as little valid ground as possible on which to object, and ensuring a speedy confirmation. If he picks another man they can just try to frame him for rape again.

>>283178
>will prevent leftists from bitching about a Trump only appointing white males
>>283184
>I'm not fond of the idea, but strategically it makes sense to pick a woman.
Enough.
Conservatism means traditionalism, Women belong in their homes, period. The be conservative is to railroad these abominations at work and replace them for men.
You can see that the leadership is cucked when it panders to pussy.

>>283187
>Women belong in their homes, period.
Why?
>The be conservative is to railroad these abominations at work and replace them for men.
If a woman is just as capable of doing the job as a man is, then why should she be sidelined? In fact, in older culture, the wife was required to pick up the slack in the household whenever the husband wasn't able to. That used to extend to concepts such as holding down the fort while the husband was away (Which meant continuing the family business if you're a peasant, to having to control the politics and economics of the entire country if you were royalty), but the modern concept is the husband and wife trading off task and responsibilities so that they can maintain their household.

>>283155
Fuck this shit.

>>283188
>Why?
Because to restore a radical traditional patriarchy is in the best interest of the nation.
Women are inferior to men and when left unchecked are destructive.
It it the leadership who must predicate with the example and until now its record is appalling.

>>283195
>Because to restore a radical traditional patriarchy is in the best interest of the nation.
You mean returning back to the times when looking at porn and masturbating was a determining factor in declaring if one was a homosexual and resulted in a trip to the local mental asylum in order to get "fixed"?
>Women are inferior to men
Yeah, THAT'S why civilization cannot progress without them. Have you seriously fallen down the MGTOW rabbit hole?
>It it the leadership who must predicate with the example and until now its record is appalling.
Weren't some of the WORST rulers in history the ones that DID treat women like objects or trophies, and it resulted in entire civilizations falling apart?

>>283196
>You mean returning back to the times when looking at porn and masturbating...
Get back on topic, women belong in the kitchen.
>MGTOW rabbit hole
Tell me MGTOW is wrong.
>Weren't some of the WORST rulers in history the ones that DID treat women like objects or trophies, and it resulted in entire civilizations falling apart?
On the contrary, there is a parallel between women's agency and degeneracy with decadence. Clamping down on women's agency is needed to put them back to work for society instead of their petty vanities.

>>283197
>Get back on topic
But, that IS on topic. If you want to go back to the "old days", that also means returning to all the negative aspects those societies encompassed. And, you cannot strip out only the "good stuff" as each society has evolved to best suite their needs, which resulted in both the positive and negative aspects of it.
>women belong in the kitchen
But all the best cooks are men.
>Tell me MGTOW is wrong.
Their "solution" to women is advocating for gay sex. Do I need to say more?
>On the contrary, there is a parallel between women's agency and degeneracy with decadence.
So, you want to go back to the polygamist societies, where men had entire harems of women, and there were constant fighting and assassinations taking place in order to ensure that one of the brides' offspring managed to inherit more than the everyone else? Also, China already did a soft-attempt of that experiment for the past 40 years with their one-child policy: https://infogalactic.com/info/One-child_policy
To give the rundown, in Chinese culture, men are considered extremely more valuable than women, so most of parents ended up aborting or killing their female children. And, it's had such a devastating effect on China that even their own government declares that, "tens of millions of young men who won't be able to find brides and may turn to kidnapping women, sex trafficking, other forms of crime or social unrest": https://archive.vn/7M0gg
>Clamping down on women's agency is needed to put them back to work for society
Hold up a second.
I thought you said that women belong in the home, so which is it? If you want women to work for the good of the society, they have to leave the house at some point to do their "work".
Unless you plan on treating women like pets, in which case you can fuck right off!

>>283198
>pets
Not at all, women are a lesser humans with a very important task for survival, to breed the next generation and raise it.
Your whole post ignores >>283195
A traditional patriarchy means that women are PROPERTY, as always has been.
First they belonged to the father, which transferred that property to the husband, if for some reason the husband wasn't any longer present, because of death for example, women could be emancipated and pursue her own interests.

>>283199
> First they belonged to the father, which transferred that property to the husband
Why are you trying to turn your fetish fuel into a reality?
>if for some reason the husband wasn't any longer present, because of death for example, women could be emancipated and pursue her own interests.
So, you want to create a society where women are encouraged to covertly murder their spouse in order to achieve freedom?

>>283200
>Why are you trying to turn your fetish fuel into a reality?
>fetish
It has been western tradition for millennia. It's the core of our civilization.

>>283200
You really "feel" that women are equal.
You have a problem.

>>283201
>It has been western tradition for millennia.
It's fetish fuel.
One that's pushed by women more than anything else because they literally want to dispose of the competition. Majority of men, at the very least, have some degree of humanity and morals when it comes to sexual relations. Half of the women out there, however, will burn everything to the fucking ground if they cannot get their 10/10 wealthy "Prince Charming". If you look at ANY of the changes towards sex laws (Both "negative" and "positive"), it's always been because a woman wanted it in order to bring disaster to her competition.

>>283202
> You really "feel" that women are equal.
Equal in abilities and purpose, no. Equal in possibilities, yes.

>>283198
>MGTOW
>Their "solution" to women is advocating for gay sex. Do I need to say more?
This is absurd. You have no idea what MGTOW is.
Lurk moar faggot.

>>283204
>Equal in possibilities, yes.
Really?
What you say is egalitarian wishful thinking.
Abilities is the main factor for possibilities.
A few exceptions don't make the rule, and the rule is that women are stupid beasts unable to sustain a civilization. Deal with it.

>>283206
>A few exceptions don't make the rule, and the rule is that women are stupid beasts unable to sustain a civilization.
And, giving women exactly what they want is somehow "defeating" them? If you want to really torture women and "put them in their place", hold them to the same standards as men, and watch as the squirm.

>>283208
>defeating them
>torture
>put them in their place
You are projecting vindictive feminine behavior, perhaps also a soy man would think that way. A rightwing point of view is most of all practical and would be to hang the ring leaders and force compliance on the rest, meaning to start popping babies.
The intention is not to punish but to position them as useful members of the collective. After all, most women a short sighted beasts and there's no point to punish them for their nature.
Think it this way, because of jews' subversive activities, women are a wasted resource, that has to change.

>>283209
>The intention is not to punish but to position them as useful members of the collective. After all, most women a short sighted beasts and there's no point to punish them for their nature.
So, WHY NOT HOLD WOMEN TO THE SAME STANDARDS AS MEN?

>>283210
>WHY NOT HOLD WOMEN TO THE SAME STANDARDS AS MEN?
Because they are not equal to men. Their mental abilities are so restricted that most of them are unable to understand the damage they are doing. To deal with an intelligent woman is like to deal with a retarded jew, their worldview is most of the time totally opposed to western interests, which bring us the logical conclusion, women's rights was a mistake to be fixed.
How hard is to get that into your brain.

>>283211
>Because they are not equal to men.
Then what do you have to worry about? If women are not equal to men, and they fail to meet the standards required, then they cannot claim any victim status because no one is being discriminatory towards them (Because the standards are universal). And, since they cannot penetrate certain areas due to being unable to meet the standards, then they cannot change the important stuff that has lasting effects. It's a problem that solves itself. Forcing any type of bias will solve nothing except breed resentment and a victimhood mentality.

Also, why did you post the same image twice?
>women's rights was a mistake to be fixed.
Because the goal of "Women's Rights" was never to create a non-biased culture, it was made TO make a culture that was biased against men.

>>283198
>But all the best cooks are men.
Yes. So put her to good use by making art, written words guided by your hand, hand made crafts, ect.
That's why you go out to a restaurant. Or make some damn killee food or teach her some skills to replicate that. Whatever floats your boat.
>MGTOW
I'm afraid you haven't seen the family courts, nor hypergamy in action. Shit's fucked.
I'll bring in the holy bell curve. Men have a wider IQ spread. Women on their bell curve do not, and the middle is slightly slightly higher than the average.
If a woman has everything required of her to function as a man or better, but with a vagina they are in the slim minority. The 1% of the 1% of the 1%.
Women have biologically different skillsets for household care, child rearing up to a certain point, and social skills.
Not only that on average there is high traits for submissive sexual relations for women.
As always there are exceptions, and they are exceptions not the rule.
NPC, Lemming, behavior is a plague, but it can be utilized to further everyone.
>>283210
It isn't a binary option you can have both.
We MUST DEMAND they operate at least to the level men can in per situational requirements. No matter how grubby, or shitty it is everyone is held up to the same standards. In every aspect.
Naturally they will fall within those dominate structures above AND find what makes them happy and content. The outliers will push the boundaries and go beyond them. That's fine, but it isn't the general rule it's the exception.
Their use as genetic lineage is important.
Also don't forget THEY ARN'T MEN they're WOMEN! Not men with vaginias, but a human with sexual dimorphism that is tangible, as always there are some weird exceptions but for a large portion it'll work.

On a more emphatic note pushing them into the best suited positions for them personally is good for societal, personal, and familial development.
If they are most suited to stay at home so be it.
If one is a savant in the field of math go ahead (I would encourage egg donarship, and motherhood as well).

Having exceptions works, but it can't be the rule. Everything will collapse, and women hate other women.
So what does this all mean. They rest mostly in SJW IQ range those types of personality traits are there. The one's that are NOT EVER IN THE MEDIA are busy with actual shit. Like raising kids, doing their job, cleaning, art, voice acting, fucking whatever.
>>283214
Just remember those guidelines have to remain hard and firm like how I- that's a low blow, not going ro do that.
Remember they will have resentment regardless, not the exceptions, and not the content and happy people.
The exceptions can do whatever because they have the ability to. Those happy with how things are with a husbando are just peachy.
Those malcontents have grudge. The jew has been feeding them lies, and falsehoods, and poison that makes life fucking suck so much.
>>283214
>Because the goal of "Women's Rights" was never to create a non-biased culture, it was made TO make a culture that was biased against men.
Right! So what's your problem with MGTOW?

>>283215
>So put her to good use by making art
But, the best artists are also men.
>I'm afraid you haven't seen the family courts,
I've read and heard the horror stories.
>nor hypergamy in action.
But, that's ALWAYS happened. You'll find works dating back centuries that are all about women trying to marry a man of higher status just so that they don't have to toil around living like a peasant. In fact, that was especially popular in Asia.
>Women have biologically different skillsets for household care, child rearing up to a certain point, and social skills.
>Not only that on average there is high traits for submissive sexual relations for women.
Yeah, women are biologically and psychologically different from men. I thought we established that.
>NPC, Lemming, behavior is a plague, but it can be utilized to further everyone.
You do realize that the problem with using a tactic that can be easily abused that it doesn't stop people with evil intentions from doing it as well, right?
>That's fine, but it isn't the general rule it's the exception.
At what point did I give the impression that I think women are 100% capable of the same exact results as men, and should therefore be always treated as if they're just like a man. They've done numerous studies over this, and regardless of age, race, and sex, (In theory) every single person on the planet should be capable of achieving the same exact results. In practice, however, despite that theorized possibility, certain demographics are only capable of achieving and optimizing certain niches and talents. That's why I keep bringing up that people should be held to the same standards, because it filters out the people who are an incorrect fit for the role demanded. For example, majority of women lack the physical strength needed for physical activities, which is why so many women used to fail on fireman and police exams, meanwhile men...actually, I cannot find any reason WHY certain fields are dominated almost solely by women. Here's a short list of them: https://archive.vn/H4NDL
And, while a few make some sense, a couple don't like SLPs and nutritionists. In the former profession, it's actually been a known problem that the field is almost entirely devoid male practitioners: https://archive.vn/xMFks
https://archive.vn/YsEKv
https://archive.vn/o8Eay
https://archive.vn/D2DoC
https://archive.vn/4ICOF
They don't know why, they keep theorizing that it's because of "low pay", "lack of advancement" and/or "gender bias against men for being 'unemotional'", but none of the studies they've done actually support any of that. Then, with the latter domination in the nutritionist profession, I cannot find any studies explaining why that is beyond a "lower pay" (Of $50k in 2007, raised to $60k by 2018 using the earlier source): https://archive.vn/wip/I3VIg
Everyone just keeps theorizing that most men just "don't care" about the foods that they eat: https://archive.vn/DQCEN
https://archive.vn/s7htv
https://archive.vn/t9Wuc
https://archive.vn/6BV6e
https://archive.vn/t9Wuc
Which is perplexing to me because I'd think that a lot of men would be looking for health advice on how to lose fat, gain muscle, and stay healthy.
>So what's your problem with MGTOW?
Like I said, that they've gone so far off the deep end that they're literally replacing women WITH MEN in order to satisfy their sexual needs. Outright rejecting to get involved with women isn't something new. Hell, you can find that several of history's scholars were single by choice, but they didn't feel insecure enough to start an entire movement over it. Continuing, fawning over porn and sex toys is still nothing new. You even have tales about such acts like the case Pygmalion, the sculptor which are viewed as either weird (At worst) or wholesome (At best). But, replacing women WITH men for sexual pleasure is a clear sign of a society in decline. Look at the Greeks as an easy example, their earlier years were times of peak masculinity: https://archive.vn/ETvYR
Then, after the Greco-Persian wars, things started to go in decline, and a society that prided itself on masculinity got to the point of even sexualizing it, which lead to their downfall: https://archive.vn/Xzewy
And, the same is happening to the concept of "MGTOW". That they've gone so far with the "masculine" ideal that it's literally becoming a sexual activity (But isn't because, "No homo, bro"): https://archive.vn/Yp5sE
Which is, ironically, repeating the same plot points as the "Women's Rights" movement (Which we were just criticizing earlier): https://archive.vn/NhK9n
<Some have noted a certain irony in the fact that MGTOW’s methodology is similar to what feminists have been doing for 50 years. “The ‘migtow’ aversion to interacting with women has a less pleasant parallel to radical feminism,” wrote Matt Forney on Return of Kings. “In the 1970s, extremist feminists such as Andrea Dworkin argued for ‘political lesbianism,’ where feminists only had relationships with other women, regardless of their sexual orientation. Dworkin’s logic was that since men were oppressing women, feminists who dated men were literally fraternizing with the enemy. I wouldn’t be surprised if some ‘migtows’ start advocating ‘political homosexuality’ in the future.”
<“Feminists have been doing what MGTOW is doing for a long time: saying that marriage is a bad deal and they’re going to pass on it,” Wade adds. “So what MGTOW is doing is very much in the hallowed feminist tradition of deciding that this deal isn’t one they want to take.”