525 replies and 442 files omitted.
Juvenile Paralysis could be lethal, because at it's worst stages it could render the victim unable to breath.
And that aside, people being crippled at high rates isn't good for the general population, because those crippled people lose productivity and and potential to contribute to society because they couldn't walk or feed themselves.>where polio """vaccine""" causes more polio causes than wild polio virus itself, and that happened before
Well which is it? Did vaccines enable weakness by preventing disease, or are they fakes that actually cause disease? What are you trying to say?>wild polio
Barely even exists anymore except in the deepest jungles of third world shitholes because of eradication methods. Most people don't even get vaccinated for it anymore because it's gone.
>>341059>vaccines causing autists to survive and procreate instead of being ended in childhood by disease (or others, for their worthlessness).
Autists do not get deadly diseases at a higher rate than any other people. Their immune systems are the same. How is it that vaccines could enable more autists, if autists don't have weaker immune systems?
You know, I won't discount the possibility that environmental factors might be causing higher rates of autism (although I think it's hormones/microplastics in the water that cause developmental deformations at an early age), but I think the rate of increase is likely also due to increased visibility of autists leading them to actually become diagnosed at higher rates, perhaps even to the degree of over-diagnosing children who are just a little weird. Autists have always been around (I can think of plenty of historical guys who were almost definitely massive autists), but historically people didn't know about developmental disorders so people who had light or severe cases of it were just called "madmen" or social deviants.
I won't dismiss the possibility of vaccines having an effect because I admittingly haven't read enough about it, although I'm still skeptical about it because I haven't seen very much solid evidence of it.
Tbh, Ebola would be a pretty shitty bioweapon, because it's not airborne and this doesn't spread quickly enough to be a suitable weapon.
Most ebola viruses also tend to kill their hosts too quickly to spread to wide populations: the one you saw in the news all those years ago was unique because it was basically an Ebola-lite with reduced lethality, but higher rate of spread. Ebola wrought havoc in African shitholes because Ebola is still able to spread from physical contact with dead subjects, so it was able to infect niggers who touched bodies when they were trying to mourn the dead (common in African funerals) and again when they tried to bury the dead in mass graves. That doesn't happen as easily in white countries who'd know how to contain it
I always loved the Ebola-chan meme (really one of my favorite /pol/ memes), but she's going to need to stop being a winglet if she wants to be a real apocalyptic virus.
>Stunning: Dr. Paul Thomas Blows Up the Conventional Vaccine Narrative—Incredible Statistics
>INCREDIBLE new study from the practice of Dr. Paul Thomas, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, showing that the Big Pharma vaccine scam has been bogus all along and that there are ZERO vaccines that make anyone healthier or more immune to disease!
>'The Control Group' Stats - Vaccinated / Unvaccinated
>60% / 5.71% - Chronic Conditions
>16.67% / 0% - Arthritis
>48% / 0% - Heart Disease
>10% / 0% - Diabetes
>7.7% / 0% - Asthma
>2.5% / 0% - Autism
>9.4% / 0.47% - ADHD
>6.0% / 0% - Cancer
That isn't how vaccines work at all.
It's the idea of building up antibodies by exposure to part of the virus without risk of severe damage. Similarly to how those who've caught a virus develop immunity, a vaccine is made to emulate that process.
No amount of antibodies would help you with the physical trauma of a bullet wound.
Do you know the cocktails of toxic chemicals that go into the modern vaccines?
>>345308>boomer meme>doesn't understand how vaccines work
Do you know that stupid meme didn't say "modern" vaccines?
give me the stats for tetnas/lockjaw.
>>345312>Shilling for the Vaxx
Kill yourself after your boyfriend gets through injecting you.
He wasn't shilling the vaxxine, retard, he was pointing out shitty logic in a meme.
The covid-19 injections cause already blisters as a side effect, not different than shingles or herpes.
Living in a police state really does turn you into an animal.
Why take a shower if work is illegal and you get welfare?
Why brush your teeth if everyone will be in prison or dead from WWIII in one year?
Why obey the law if everything is illegal?
Americans have bullet trains, free college, and Obamacare now, but what is the use if you will be groped by the TSA if you travel, your college education will lead to a higher wage that will be taxed to pay for wars, debt, and tyranny, and you must wear a mask and get a dangerous vaccine to receive medical care?
Why plan to go to Miami if everyone is under house arrest or even remodel your kitchen when you have no hope?
You can’t vote for change because the USA is not a democracy and you can’t flee the US because the entire world is a police state now.
Maybe we can find the pastebin for all of it's phrases like the last time we had a bot. >>346041
NEW - Spacebusters is back.>The End of Germ Theory>00:01:21 Dr Rosenau / US Public Health Service failed Spanish Flu contagion experiments>00:08:14 Goat Island / US Public Health Service failed Spanish Flu contagion experiments>00:10:32 Johns Hopkins / Dr Sellard failed Measles contagion experiments. Dr. Alfred F Hess failed Chicken Pox varicella contagion experiments>00:12:25 NY State Health Department / US Public health Service failed Polio contagion experiments>00:15:13 Dr. Eleanor McBean vaccination caused Spanish Flu pandemic research>00:16:06 Dr Frederick Lamont Gates / US Army Antimenigitis vaccination fiasco>00:17:00 Black Death, Spanish Flu outbreak follows 14-25 vaccinations per person>00:21:30 Unvaccinated doctors and families did not catch the Spanish Flu from patients>00:23:05 Masha & Dasha, conjoined twins who never caught flu, colds, measles from each other>00:24:17 What is Polio really? Lead Arsenate and DDT trends vs outbreaks>00:27:35 False vaccine disease eradication claims and trends>00:28:44 7 common causes of Polio>00:29:14 What is a “virus particle”?>00:32:47 What is Cytopathic Effect “Theory”?>00:33:22 What is Viral Replication “Theory”?>00:38:28 What is a virology cell or tissue “Culture”?>00:42:00 Cytopathic Effect Theory debunked>00:42:40 Autolysis and Apoptosis>00:44:48 Virus particle Isolation and Purification>00:55:38 PCR test fraud and misuse>01:06:54 CDC Covid PCR diagnostic test fraud>01:08:50 “Insilico” imaginary genomes>01:16:50 John Enders’ debunked Measles experiments>01:23:34 Studies admitting virus particles are indistinquishable from cellular debris>01:29:18 Fraudulent Australian failed Covid isolation experiments>01:32:13 Fetal Bovine Calf Serum RNA>01:34:28 Dr Stefan Lanka control experiments debunk virus theory once and for all>01:47:20 1947 fraudulent Polio isolation experiments debunked>02:01:28 Virology fails Koch’s postulates>02:02:59 Antibodies, Antigen test fraud, HIV>02:11:35 Antibody vaccine theory debunked>02:16:38 Big Pharma re-name disease game>02:16:54 Monkeypox fraud>02:22:51 Real causes of Pox diseases>02:24:28 1957 Monkeypox failed contagion experiments and controls debunk virology>02:31:49 Why do some but not all people sometimes but not always seem sick together?https://odysee.com/@spacebusters:c9/Final-The-End-of-Germ-Theory:8
Virology is a humongous fraud poners.
This is pretty good stuff, I do not need a tinfoil hat to understand it.
can the vaccine just kill me already or do i have to take two doses
Take 3. Better safe than sorry
Can (you) connect the dots?
Yeah, all the plagues came from China.
So the freemason narrative says.
Are these the same freemasons who are involved in the flat earth "cover up"? Busy busy busy
Because the laws in the Australia are completely different to the laws in the U.S.. And, the U.S. has guns.
If bacteria and viruses don't exist, what does antibacterial handwash do?
"Reduce the toxins in your body"? Like what a lemon juice "detox" is supposed to do?
Are there unironically people who believe bacteria don't exist? Or do they just believe that bacteria-based diseases are overstated?
Ffs, you can see bacteria with a microscope. I've personally worked with them when interning at a bio lab for osteoporosis research. They're essential to all kinds of lab work.
>>347602>"polio outbreak" reported in the UK and around the world
This is what they get for importing shitskin from remote villages in India and Pakistan by the thousands.
This article says a lot about how the Rockefeller Institute profited from virus research, but does very little to counter conventional evidence for viral polio.
>In NYC. Homos are queuing for their monkey jab
To make vaccines, the stem cells have to be extracted from a fully formed and "ALIVE" fetus.
If true.. this is really fucked up.
>W.H.O. warns anyone who receives a MonkeyPox vaccine is considered to be part of a clinical trial
Do you unironically think that contagious viral pathogens don't exist?
Correct, contagious viruses are an oxymoron.
But it is not about what an anon thinks, but the flawed research on them and therefore the humongous hoax is virology.
I know the virology community has plenty of self-serving shitheads, but viruses are a real thing. We've known about them for a while now. We've reproduced them in labs and tested rats for their symptoms. We've sequenced the genomes of some of them to see how strains mutate year by year in populations.
They are absolutely contagious. Other contagious pathogens exist (bacteria, parasites and certain prions), but viruses are unique.
Dude, read the thread, virology doesn't hold water. But you still go on with the establishment narrative. Either you never dug into the issue and insist on something you have no clue whatsoever, which make you into a moron; or, you did but are not bringing any data to debunk the Terrain Theory and therefore your claims validating the Germ Theory are empty.
>>349078>Other contagious pathogens exist (bacteria, parasites and certain prions), but viruses are unique.
Sure, many alive organisms are pathogenic and contagious, the so called viruses are dead cellular garbage and harmless.
Viruses aren't organisms, or at least not by the standards of what we consider to be alive. Things don't need to be alive to be pathogenic though. Viruses aren't considered alive because they have no ability to reproduce on their own, only highjack a living cell's capabilities; despite lack of capacity for self propagation, they can still spread from host to host using the host's own cell signalling systems.
And then there's prions, which are basically just proteins folded wrong, but still end up being contagious between hosts, and keep replicating even within dead tissue material.>harmless
Many of them are no threat to most humans, but many more are also still harmful and absolutely contagious. They can only spread through contagion, either between cells of a host or between the hosts themselves.
Perhaps you are knowledgeable enough, because 9 of 10 doctors got blank when asked where viruses come from, meaning that them are the equivalent of shop mechanics reading the manual when confronted with the subject.
All animals have inside TRILLIONS of viruses, because those particles are the a natural process of the cells getting rid of toxicity and debris. The claim that those debris reproduce is non-sense as well that they cause sickness.
I have read the thread. I just haven't posted to it very often.>Germ theory
You literally just said in the other post that pathogenic organisms exist: that's germ theory. It began with microorganisms like bacteria.
The thread is about vaccines, which are based in the supposedly pathogenic nature of the so called viruses.
Alive pathogenic organisms is a totally different category not covered by vaccines.
>>349084>Alive pathogenic organisms is a totally different category
See antibiotics for treatment.
>>349082>those debris reproduce
They don't reproduce. They attach to the cell walls of living cells and hijack their signalling systems to force the cells to make copies of them.> 9 of 10 doctors got blank when asked where viruses come from
For the same reason that they can't say for certain what the origin of life is: they weren't there when the first viruses came about, and they have no means to know if they can just spontaneously appear (prions can though. Interesting little fuckers).
For all science can tell, the only known viruses have been derivative of other viruses, >All animals have inside TRILLIONS of viruses
You only call it a virus if it spreads virally. Normal cell signaling protein packages wouldn't be considered such if they only deteriorate after fulfilling their purpose.>as well that they cause sickness.
The sickness is caused by the death or impairment of host cells that have been made to print garbage RNA to perpetuate a virus instead of fulfilling their actual purposes, and the body's immune response to that.
And if you think that something produced in the body can't possibly cause illness, know that cancer cells are produced in the body too.>>349084
I am absolutely skeptical of modern vaccine industries, and any attempts to mandate their untested products or enrich their shareholders, and I want more medical transparency in the industry, and less secrecy to protect their financial interests. I have not however seen sufficient counters to the evidence that viruses exist.>Alive pathogenic organisms
They are indeed. They're also treated differently in the field of medicine. Antibiotics and antivirals don't work the same way.
As for prions... Nobody knows wtf to do with them. They're basically indestructible, and appear whenever they want.
>>349086>As for prions... Nobody knows wtf to do with them. They're basically indestructible, and appear whenever they want.
According to who? Follow the money anon.
What do you mean "according to who"? I just said nobody knows what to do with them; except maybe the few people who pretend they know how to treat them. Prion diseases are basically hopeless, painful deaths at this point. Medical science hasn't come that far.
Just don't eat human brains, and don't feed cows to cows.>Follow the money
Are you implying that the elites secretly have a cure to prison diseases, and are paying people off to suppress it?
I wouldn't be surprised, I bet they have cures for cancer too, but prion diseases aren't really common enough for that to have a major profit motive.
>>349088>Are you implying that the elites secretly have a cure to prison diseases, and are paying people off to suppress it?
Nope, I'm saying watch out for "scientific" hoaxes that cannot be corroborated by people who are not funded by those claiming the illness exist indeed. Remember the AIDS hoax.
>>349089>Remember the AIDS hoax.
There were multiple hoaxes and psyops concerning AIDS. Which one are you referring to?
As for prions, there's quite a bit of research concerning them, although few treatments for them once they manifest (some things are just hard to treat). They're basically just rogue proteins that fuck stuff up wherever they go; even simpler than viruses, and many times as deadly.
In any case, there haven't been very many sweeping government policies concerning them (although I guess we're not allowed to feed baby cows the ground-up remains of their parent's brains and spinal cords anymore, boo hoo), so I'll put my skepticism of their existence on hold.
>>349090>They're basically just rogue proteins that fuck stuff up wherever they go
You are told.
Allow me to be skeptical of the scientists' claims.
You don't think transmissible spongiform encephalopathies cause diseases in humans?
What do you think caused mad cow disease then? It was verified by scientists on three continents to be the result of deformed proteins caused by forcing cows to eat each other.
Of course, that could be a lie, but they did find those proteins in the brains of both infected cattle and humans who'd consumed the meat.
Now, you could say that they didn't have direct evidence that the mutated proteins caused the illness in people due to not performing experiments on human subjects (which would involve killing people), but they were able to reproduce the results in rats who are the tainted beef.
I can't really think of why people would about that one in particular, except maybe to shut down a couple factory farms and maybe make excuses for beef tariffs. Of course, the medical industry is full of frauds and hacks, so critical skepticism is always important.
But I believe them enough to not feed cows to cows and not practice cannibalism, because apparently humans/cow biology isn't meant for that crap.
Does anyone here have anecdotes or statistics relating to the recently approved Novavax Covid vaccine? From my own research it appears to be a legitimate vaccine using "tried-and-true" protein subunit tech. The kind that's been in use for decades. But I want to know how people's bodies have actually been reacting to it. It's available in several countries now including the USA so there should be news one way or the other.
So far there's been little documented evidence of adverse reactions.
Of course, it still remains to be seen how it works.
If you ever get bitten by a mad dog, I seriously hope you go get treatment for it immediately. Rabies is a horrible and painful way to die. I've seen animals die from that shit before they could be put down, and it is gruesome.
Polio 101 - The Missing Medical School Lectures
The fascinating parts about Polio you might have missed in Medical School, presented in 2 minutes. Packed with interesting information guaranteed to help clarify the foggy bits of the amazing Polio story.
The polio reemergence is the result of importing shitskins from third world countries. We could've been free of it forever, but no, they just had to have diversity.
The polio thing is a man-made poisoning dating before any shitskin even showed up in the radar.
Despite how long those two snippets are they are too brief for what they cover. The pointless inflammatory language makes me wonder if it's designed to associate the subject with disinformation too.
The simple version is that the polio virus does exist but it doesn't cause paralysis on it's own. The vaccine never worked, it's an endemic virus that's living in your guts right now. The paralysis was caused by ingesting poisoned food that fucked the blood-brain barrier allowing the polio and who knows what else past causing meningitis/encephalitis.
Saulk knowingly did evil things. The formaldehyde they used to attenuate the virus made it cyst up instead of killing it even if they didn't remove all the formaldehyde. They knowingly injected kids with poison and live virus in the deep muscle where it was more likely to infect the nervous system. They were causing polio, cases increased when the vaccine was introduced after decreasing at the same rate as the reduction in toxic pesticide usage. That was with the government changing the definition to limit what was counted as polio.<insert JFK.jpg here>
Let's see if something with less "inflammatory" language will make it through.https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/startling-history-polio-vaccination
That's much better. It doesen't leave any room to blame the author of not believing in pathogens. Normalfags love their witch hunts, for science.
I forgot about the monkey kidney cancer.
>Secrets of Virology - "Control" Experiments - (15:26 long)>Recently, there was a claim that virologists carry out properly controlled experiments, which show that the "no virus" position is false. Have we missed something?https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Secrets-of-Virology-Control-Experiments:e
In a nutshell, virology is a fraud.
>I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person
>Eustace Mullins quotes a book a doctor wrote in the year 1936: "I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”
Correlation doesn't imply causation, tbh. There are tons of different ways to get cancer.
A glaring detail about cancer is that there are not historical records of it before vaccines.
>there is not historical records of it before vaccines
Again, correlation =/= causation. A variable you're not considering is that people didn't call it cancer until relatively recenrly. Records of cancer by other names go back to 3000 BC.
I'm not dismissing the plausibility that ingredients in vaccines could cause or exacerbate cancer, but to say that vaccines cause all cancer is just completely unfounded.
>>352677>>352678>Some of the earliest evidence of cancer is found among fossilized bone tumors, human mummies in ancient Egypt, and ancient manuscripts. Growths suggestive of the bone cancer called osteosarcoma have been seen in mummies. Bony skull destruction as seen in cancer of the head and neck has been found, too.>Our oldest description of cancer (although the word cancer was not used) was discovered in Egypt and dates back to about 3000 BC. It’s called the Edwin Smith Papyrus and is a copy of part of an ancient Egyptian textbook on trauma surgery. It describes 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast that were removed by cauterization with a tool called the fire drill. The writing says about the disease, “There is no treatment.”>The origin of the word cancer is credited to the Greek physician Hippocrates (460-370 BC), who is considered the “Father of Medicine.” Hippocrates used the terms carcinos and carcinoma to describe non-ulcer forming and ulcer-forming tumors. In Greek, these words refer to a crab, most likely applied to the disease because the finger-like spreading projections from a cancer called to mind the shape of a crab. The Roman physician, Celsus (25 BC - 50 AD), later translated the Greek term into cancer, the Latin word for crab. Galen (130-200 AD), another Greek physician, used the word oncos (Greek for swelling) to describe tumors. Although the crab analogy of Hippocrates and Celsus is still used to describe malignant tumors, Galen’s term is now used as a part of the name for cancer specialists – oncologists.
Where did you hear about cancer only occurring after vaccines? Inbred nobles have been growing painful tumors on their bodies since the beginning of written history.
That's not to say that vaccines or vaccine ingredients couldn't hypothetically be a cause, but they can't be the only
cause. There are lots of things in the world that can cause cancer.
Wait, is not those quotes from (((Wikipedia)))?
>The outstanding London surgeon Percivall Pott made numerous original observations. In 1775 he pointed out that many males who had been chimney sweepers while boys later suffered from scrotal cancer and linked this with irritation caused by soot, and thus identified the first cancer-causing occupation.
Cancer was understood and documented to be a disease before vaccines were even thought of. The earliest vaccine was in 1796, when Edward Jenner injected a teenager with cowpox to give him immunity to smallpox; and that was before vaccines were made from dead protein shells or mixed with other dubious additives and preservatives.
Again, not discounting the plausibility for vaccines to cause cancer, but cancer can clearly form independently from vaccines.