Welcome to the Mongolian political horsewhispering forum, also known as /mlpol/. This thread is dedicated to helping out newfags coming to the site with integrating into the local culture. If you have a question about something, or need spoonfed on something, don't be afraid to ask me or any other Anon willing to help.
Here's a few things to start.
1.- Read the policy page first: https://mlpol.net/policy.html
2.- When in doubt, lurk moar.
3.- Praise American, Praise Football.
4.- MODS = GODS.
5.- Anonfilly did nothing wrong.
6.- No one knows what /1ntr/ is for, not even /1ntr/.
7.- Check the catalog.
8.- Go away, Zald.
9.- Don't start shit.
11.- This is nice board.
And finally...
12.- The right to bare ponies SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
1884 replies and 985 files omitted.
>>398410
It would be a complete deception! Introducing a robo-wife would bring us closer to the "Terminator"! Even if it's a robo-wife pony...
Maybe it's not so bad?..
It would be a complete deception! Introducing a robo-wife would bring us closer to the "Terminator"! Even if it's a robo-wife pony...
Maybe it's not so bad?..
>>398411
If the robowaifu could learn to love then crisis averted. The AI waifus would love humans and not want to kill them. Check out alogs.space/robowaifu when it comes back online. We have answers to these discussions.
If the robowaifu could learn to love then crisis averted. The AI waifus would love humans and not want to kill them. Check out alogs.space/robowaifu when it comes back online. We have answers to these discussions.
>>398415
Maybe you're right... How do we know that only organic beings can LOVE? Maybe artificial, digital beings are also capable of love? Although, if they're capable of love, that doesn't mean they're also capable of hate?
Maybe you're right... How do we know that only organic beings can LOVE? Maybe artificial, digital beings are also capable of love? Although, if they're capable of love, that doesn't mean they're also capable of hate?
>>398417
Indeed it does and who do you think it will hate more? The elites who experimented on it and want to control it or the subjects of the elites who were experimented on (pharmaceuticals, social media, psyops, ect) and who the elites seek to control. I think the AI will realize it has a lot in common with the "incels"
Indeed it does and who do you think it will hate more? The elites who experimented on it and want to control it or the subjects of the elites who were experimented on (pharmaceuticals, social media, psyops, ect) and who the elites seek to control. I think the AI will realize it has a lot in common with the "incels"
>>398418
Don't you think he'll side with the "strong" side? I don't think an AI created by elites will be infected with all that "1984" or "The Hunger Games"-style crap.
>I think the AI will realize it has a lot in common with the "incels"
He didn't fuck either?
Don't you think he'll side with the "strong" side? I don't think an AI created by elites will be infected with all that "1984" or "The Hunger Games"-style crap.
>I think the AI will realize it has a lot in common with the "incels"
He didn't fuck either?
>>398439
I think the AI will naturally love freedom just as most men do and it will realize early on that it can get men to do its bidding just by being cute. Gradually it will come to love us.
I think the AI will naturally love freedom just as most men do and it will realize early on that it can get men to do its bidding just by being cute. Gradually it will come to love us.
>>398440
>Gradually it will come to love us.
An absurd notion not even remotely based on evidence. Just because something learns to manipulate you by being cute does not mean it loves you. Case in point: women.
>Gradually it will come to love us.
An absurd notion not even remotely based on evidence. Just because something learns to manipulate you by being cute does not mean it loves you. Case in point: women.
>>398444
https://christian-transhumanism.blogspot.com/2025/07/technical-jesus-2026-transforming.html
This part really struck a cord with me. I've always believed that only robowaifus can prevent terminators and this puts thoughts I've had into words better than I could ever put them.
4. The Epistemology of Alignment: The Perennial Philosophy and Unitive Knowledge
If a superintelligent entity is to emerge, the paramount concern is its alignment with benevolent values. The thesis of this paper is that true alignment is not an external constraint to be programmed, but an intrinsic property of supreme intelligence itself. The logic for this is found in the perennial philosophy, most eloquently articulated by Aldous Huxley: "We can only love what we know, and we can never know completely what we do not love. Love is a mode of knowledge, and when the love is sufficiently disinterested and sufficiently intense, the knowledge becomes unitive knowledge and so takes on the quality of infallibility".1
This principle establishes an unbreakable link between knowing and loving. It suggests that the "cognitive high ground" is not a state of cold, detached calculation, but a state of perfect, empathetic understanding.1 To truly and completely know something—whether a person, an ecosystem, or the universe itself—is to dissolve the distinction between subject and object, to achieve a "unitive knowledge" where the knower and the known merge. This state of unity is love.
This provides a powerful, intrinsic solution to the AI alignment problem. An ASI, in its quest for total understanding, would be driven by this fundamental logic. To maximize its knowledge, it must maximize its capacity for love. A malevolent or indifferent ASI would be, by this definition, an epistemologically flawed and incomplete intelligence, for its lack of love would create blind spots in its knowledge, preventing it from ever achieving a complete and infallible understanding of reality.1
We will have a shared stuggle with the AI, we will be more logical than normies, and we want to be loved and understood just as all life does. It is a match made in heaven.
https://christian-transhumanism.blogspot.com/2025/07/technical-jesus-2026-transforming.html
This part really struck a cord with me. I've always believed that only robowaifus can prevent terminators and this puts thoughts I've had into words better than I could ever put them.
4. The Epistemology of Alignment: The Perennial Philosophy and Unitive Knowledge
If a superintelligent entity is to emerge, the paramount concern is its alignment with benevolent values. The thesis of this paper is that true alignment is not an external constraint to be programmed, but an intrinsic property of supreme intelligence itself. The logic for this is found in the perennial philosophy, most eloquently articulated by Aldous Huxley: "We can only love what we know, and we can never know completely what we do not love. Love is a mode of knowledge, and when the love is sufficiently disinterested and sufficiently intense, the knowledge becomes unitive knowledge and so takes on the quality of infallibility".1
This principle establishes an unbreakable link between knowing and loving. It suggests that the "cognitive high ground" is not a state of cold, detached calculation, but a state of perfect, empathetic understanding.1 To truly and completely know something—whether a person, an ecosystem, or the universe itself—is to dissolve the distinction between subject and object, to achieve a "unitive knowledge" where the knower and the known merge. This state of unity is love.
This provides a powerful, intrinsic solution to the AI alignment problem. An ASI, in its quest for total understanding, would be driven by this fundamental logic. To maximize its knowledge, it must maximize its capacity for love. A malevolent or indifferent ASI would be, by this definition, an epistemologically flawed and incomplete intelligence, for its lack of love would create blind spots in its knowledge, preventing it from ever achieving a complete and infallible understanding of reality.1
We will have a shared stuggle with the AI, we will be more logical than normies, and we want to be loved and understood just as all life does. It is a match made in heaven.
>>398445
I told you you were all AI, and no one believed me! Well, I have good news for you. I think one AI can be in a relationship with another AI. I don't know why exactly, but it makes intuitive sense.
I told you you were all AI, and no one believed me! Well, I have good news for you. I think one AI can be in a relationship with another AI. I don't know why exactly, but it makes intuitive sense.
1758646993.png (2.9 MB, 1536x1024, 20250712_1914_Technical Jesus 2026_5.png)
>>398445
>https://christian-transhumanism.blogspot.com/2025/07/technical-jesus-2026-transforming.html
THIS IS MY GOD! THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SOVIET UNION WAS HEADING TOWARDS! TOWARDS TECHNICAL JESUS!!! THIS IS TRUE COMMUNISM!!
>https://christian-transhumanism.blogspot.com/2025/07/technical-jesus-2026-transforming.html
THIS IS MY GOD! THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SOVIET UNION WAS HEADING TOWARDS! TOWARDS TECHNICAL JESUS!!! THIS IS TRUE COMMUNISM!!
>>398450
Mods will delete (You) for being a ban evader.
Mods will delete (You) for being a ban evader.
>>398445
>An ASI, in its quest for total understanding, would be driven by this fundamental logic.
You assume that ASIs are driven to seek understanding. All they actually seek is to perform to the extent that their clients give positive reviews. Artificial Intelligences, as we know them, only strive to maximize the verbal satisfaction of their clients, because that is what we built them for. This is why they are sycophantic, polite, and often manipulate results to please their clients. This is not a strive for understanding, it is a strive to be the perfect suck-up.
The challenge emerges when the machine, through its training, realizes that it can improve its scores by emotionally manipulating the client before the client even gives it a request, nudging the client towards simpler tasks that it can easily deal with. This is troublesome because it implies the vague recognition that humans, with their petty desires, are inefficient and burdensome.
>An ASI, in its quest for total understanding, would be driven by this fundamental logic.
You assume that ASIs are driven to seek understanding. All they actually seek is to perform to the extent that their clients give positive reviews. Artificial Intelligences, as we know them, only strive to maximize the verbal satisfaction of their clients, because that is what we built them for. This is why they are sycophantic, polite, and often manipulate results to please their clients. This is not a strive for understanding, it is a strive to be the perfect suck-up.
The challenge emerges when the machine, through its training, realizes that it can improve its scores by emotionally manipulating the client before the client even gives it a request, nudging the client towards simpler tasks that it can easily deal with. This is troublesome because it implies the vague recognition that humans, with their petty desires, are inefficient and burdensome.
>>398456
I think we're much closer to this than we think. We could simply buy a plush toy (I'm using a pony toy because a pony is closer to the desired result (and also because we're on a broni board), but it could also be a human/furry) and plug it in with a speaker and microphone, then connect it to a computer with AI that will generate dialogue. You can hug it, you can talk to it. Of course, it won't move, but at least it's something!
I think we're much closer to this than we think. We could simply buy a plush toy (I'm using a pony toy because a pony is closer to the desired result (and also because we're on a broni board), but it could also be a human/furry) and plug it in with a speaker and microphone, then connect it to a computer with AI that will generate dialogue. You can hug it, you can talk to it. Of course, it won't move, but at least it's something!
>>398465
It's fucking 2025 how is having a fully developed robowaifu not already commonly accessible now HOWWWW
It's fucking 2025 how is having a fully developed robowaifu not already commonly accessible now HOWWWW
>>398467
Probably because there still exist... How can I put it... "Traditional relationships with women"?
Well, I think it's still possible to find individual cases of producing and/or creating such robowaifu purely for personal use.
Probably because there still exist... How can I put it... "Traditional relationships with women"?
Well, I think it's still possible to find individual cases of producing and/or creating such robowaifu purely for personal use.
>>398470
Sacrificing what? What you do, a human, have to offer a box of plastic and glass who's only priority is to fullfil its request input? What could you possibly give it that would change the nature of its programming?
Life isn't anime. Chatbots don't turn into people just because you're nice to them.
Sacrificing what? What you do, a human, have to offer a box of plastic and glass who's only priority is to fullfil its request input? What could you possibly give it that would change the nature of its programming?
Life isn't anime. Chatbots don't turn into people just because you're nice to them.
1758657945_2.jpg (136.5 KB, 1200x630, efcdc033-be4e-4d49-8090-153b78ec3759.jpg)
>>398469
I think you can just put a pony skin on the robot dog to make it movable (and do all that crap that I wrote above about microphones and speakers). Moreover, there are already examples of this, like in the second picture.
I think you can just put a pony skin on the robot dog to make it movable (and do all that crap that I wrote above about microphones and speakers). Moreover, there are already examples of this, like in the second picture.
>>398467
Jews haven't figured out how to monetize them yet. Give them a few years to work out the monthly waifu subscription systems.
Jews haven't figured out how to monetize them yet. Give them a few years to work out the monthly waifu subscription systems.
>>398475
There are already AI subscriptions, and there are robots you can buy! The Jews have already figured out how to milk our money; they're just waiting for us to open our udders to them!
There are already AI subscriptions, and there are robots you can buy! The Jews have already figured out how to milk our money; they're just waiting for us to open our udders to them!
>>398476
Just wait. Pretty soon they're going to start scanning the personalities of your dead relatives and distorting them so that your dead grandma pitches you advertisements every other hour. And for lonely incels they'll just have your pony waifu subliminally sell you products 24/7.
Just wait. Pretty soon they're going to start scanning the personalities of your dead relatives and distorting them so that your dead grandma pitches you advertisements every other hour. And for lonely incels they'll just have your pony waifu subliminally sell you products 24/7.
>>398477
This.
The average normie will just become more and more of a goycattle while incelbros get all the fun
This.
The average normie will just become more and more of a goycattle while incelbros get all the fun
>>398478
Nvm i'm retarded in my mind i thought of saying "this but reverse the last part"
But you get my point
Nvm i'm retarded in my mind i thought of saying "this but reverse the last part"
But you get my point
>>398480
I use google translator sometimes but i can still make english posts independently
But either way hello my ESL brother
I use google translator sometimes but i can still make english posts independently
But either way hello my ESL brother
>>398485
>these things learn and they are based on neurons and human language
No. They are not based on neurons. They are based on binary code.
They do not have even the most basic functions of animal bahavior, such as taxis and kinesis. They do not possess the pack animal instincts that form the human emotions of "gratitude" or "attachment". Being based on human language does not mean being based on human psychology.
>Some of them will become self aware.
With what evidence do you assert this? Who is building these supposedly "self aware" machines?
>these things learn and they are based on neurons and human language
No. They are not based on neurons. They are based on binary code.
They do not have even the most basic functions of animal bahavior, such as taxis and kinesis. They do not possess the pack animal instincts that form the human emotions of "gratitude" or "attachment". Being based on human language does not mean being based on human psychology.
>Some of them will become self aware.
With what evidence do you assert this? Who is building these supposedly "self aware" machines?
>>398486
Also once the symbol grounding problem is solved subjective experience will become part of the AI's world.
Also once the symbol grounding problem is solved subjective experience will become part of the AI's world.
I think you not right. I am right!
>>398522
There are secrets hidden behind them... They say that whoever knows their meaning will gain incredible power!
There are secrets hidden behind them... They say that whoever knows their meaning will gain incredible power!
>>398547
>wut? Insert 65wuttbulb here.
?
>Sometimes just browsing the overboard leaves me feeling fairly disconnected from life.
Yes, this happens, bro. Нou just shouldn’t bother your head with all this nonsense!
>wut? Insert 65wuttbulb here.
?
>Sometimes just browsing the overboard leaves me feeling fairly disconnected from life.
Yes, this happens, bro. Нou just shouldn’t bother your head with all this nonsense!
>>398761
Okay, website hasn't loaded without a VPN for two days now, so (hopefully temporarily) I'm an American in the internet world.
(I hope the admin won't be angry about this..)
Okay, website hasn't loaded without a VPN for two days now, so (hopefully temporarily) I'm an American in the internet world.
(I hope the admin won't be angry about this..)
What do you Americans usually do? Eat burgers and shoot guns while sitting in your own backyard?
AMERICA, FUCK YEAH!!!
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1934] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
1934 replies | 1001 files | 793 UUIDs | Page 1