/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


untitled.png
Best Korea's and Biological and Chemical arsenal
Anonymous
ZrF1l
?
No.100383
100423 100504
Just a thought...
So lets say Best Korea's dear leader Kim decides to attack the US and he chooses to use Biological weapon instead of Nuclear. I have no doubt that the US have a capabilities to shoot down an incoming missile, and a 1300 pound (600kg) nuclear payload exploding high up is not the worst outcome (bad but not anywhere like the fallout of it hitting the target). But lets say a rocket carrying 1300 pound (600kg) of anthrax is intercepted and shot down/destroyed. What will the fallout be? I doubt the biological payload will be completely destroyed by any stretch of imagination. Also there is as described in the article from fox the possibility for someone just to stroll in and disperse it.

http://archive.is/7wq8d
http://archive.is/d6ybY
Anonymous
0qkpD
?
No.100423
100437
>>100383
Rumour says NK was a front for the deep state. The deep state gave NK nukes. The NK threats were deep state threats by proxy. If so, with the deep state dismantled NK has no reason to invite its demise.
Anonymous
ZrF1l
?
No.100437
>>100423
That is true. And if we assume this is correct even the best laid plans of leftist have a tendency to blow up in their faces. If enough people in NK believes in Kim and Kim goes rogue he can do lots of shit. But if Kim is on his own I think a Biological attack would be high on his list of lines of attack.
Anonymous
2vCIt
?
No.100504
>>100383
They might be developing biological weapons right now, they do not care about human rights after all.
Unit 731 stuff, it's better to be careful because the treat might be real, NK is a weird country no one really understands and by the looks of it, all of their money is being focused on only one thing, and it is not their army.
Anonymous
zaDVm
?
No.100933
100942 107951
>Anthrax
Anthrax is a bacteria, not a virus. It can be treated with anti-biotics, and there are vaccines to protect against it. Since it can't spread from person to person, any damage it could cause would be limited to those in its immediate area of effect, and some of those could still be saved through modern medicine.

I'd be worried if they managed to spread something highly contagious like Ebola, but Anthrax... would likely not be as effective.
Anonymous
ZrF1l
?
No.100942
1493837599129.jpg
>>100933
You are right, I didn't think fully when posting
>wants to hide face in shame
Anonymous
????
?
No.107951
107953
>>100933
Ebola isn't as dangerous as it's made out to be, modern hygiene and medicine render its spread limited. It only killed a lot of niggers because they don't practice quarantine and hygienic measures on things like their water supply.

>Every shitskin in the village drinks from the same muddy pool they and all the animals of the land shit in

Anonymous
????
?
No.107953
>>107951
That and the fact that they try to cure AIDS by raping children. They're really not the sharpest knives in the drawer for the most part.
;