/cyb/ - Cyberpunk Fiction and Fact

>>2993
That sounds like it warrants a more specific thread

>>2994
Yeah, maybe.

>>128
there is a spiritual bottleneck on technology all of this will turn out well and swell cant wait for robowaifu/monstergirl revolution babylon,demiurge,archons,etc seethe more :D you dont have an afterlife and your lifespan is running out

also waht the fuck is "By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal." this shit ? when did this faggotry get added to the site

>>3018
>also waht the fuck is "By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal." this shit ? when did this faggotry get added to the site
Uh, it's pretty much been here since the beginning. Also, you should probably take your meds.

>>3018
>also waht the fuck is "By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal."
Welcome newfren.

>>3018
>you dont have an afterlife and your lifespan is running out
Meh. Did you hear about resurrection and the recycling of souls?

>also waht the fuck is "By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal." this shit ? when did this faggotry get added to the site
Check the clip out, newfag.

>>3019
>been here since the beginning.
No it wasn't. It was only put in place~4 years ago.

>>3022
I remember, there was some cases of blatant fedposting.

>>3023
Yeah, and then that piece of text was added as a joke to put Anons at ease.

>>3024
But it has worked very well. The fedposting came to a screeching halt.

>>3025
Eh, idk about that. The fed posting dubiously existed in the first place, and may have just been one dedicated troll. Feds have very little interest in spending their time/resources shitposting on a site this small, and if they do they probably wouldn't stay for extended periods and would instead just "check in" maybe once a year for a few weeks at a time.
That aside, it's a joke. The CIA may have a policy against discussing Israel's nuclear arsenal, but it's not an ironclad rule; they can say whatever they want to advance their interests, and nothing prevents them from checking a box on a screen.

>>3026
>nothing prevents them from checking a box on a screen
If everything has to be documented in order to kidnap someone and their pension is on the line, the box checking is a line on the sand.

>>3027
You imply that the CIA cares about documenting their crimes or following the policies that they claim to uphold on paper (like not killing Americans).
I also think that that policy may be antiquated, as it appears that glownigs have decided to forgo suppressing discussion of Israel's nukes in favor of instead threatening the Sampson option to the world. Mossad puppets like Ben Shapiro have been openly threatening nuclear exchange if Israel finds itself at the center of a larger conflict in the middle east. We have no way of confirming if the CIA still follows that old policy; it may have been a vestige of the time during the 20th century that Israel was still building up its nuclear arsenal and wanted to evade scrutiny from the international community. Instead of keeping their nukes secret, Israel seems to be openly threatening to deploy them in a North Korea like saber rattling.

>>3028
>You imply that the CIA
Nope, it was you who mentioned the CIA. Above posts clearly indicate employees on federal payroll which embraces millions of of niggers.

>>3029
Well, I was there when the text was added, and I'm pretty sure it's in reference to the CIA's policy (I could be mistaken though, it was a while ago). I figured you just used "CIA" and "Fed" interchangeably.
>employees on federal payroll
This can't be true. I have had conversations with multiple government employees, including federal ones, about Israel's nukes recently. It must only be a policy for glowniggers and high level diplomats; not run-of-the-mill pencil pushers.

>>3030
>It must only be a policy for glowniggers and high level diplomats; not run-of-the-mill pencil pushers.
Perhaps, to which extent the rules apply is unclear.

>>3031
Like I said before, the rule may not even be real anymore, because the media keeps bringing up the Samson Option.
The CIA changes its policies all the time, and intentionally keeps them secret, because if foreign intelligence agencies know about them they're moot. If the truth about one of their policies leaks, they'll change it; sometimes they'll even intentionally leak antiquated policies years later to throw off the public and rival intelligence agencies.

>>3032
>the media keeps bringing up the Samson Option
>(((the media)))
The jews can say what the goyim can't.

This has kind of gotten off-topic. Then again, I made this thread 6 years ago and the conversation around AI has shifted so much that this thread is stale beyond saving, so idgaf.

>>3034
>the conversation around AI has shifted so much that this thread is stale beyond saving
It can come immediately on track by posting related content. No need to be alarmist.

>>3035
>alarmist
Alarm about what?
>It can come immediately on track by posting related content.
I think I'll just post a fresh thread when I find the energy to fill it with related content. No need to run a 6 year old thread into the (absurdly high) bump limit.

>>3036
Unnecessary, this one is fine, but if feel that way...

>>128
>What does /cyb/ think about artificial intelligence?
It's crap.

This is what Microsoft AI has hardcoded as hate.
So according to the jews hate speech is when White people defend themselves when the jews are genociding them through mass immigration.

This one is for you, Tay-chan