/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

>>172609
lmao this entire wall of text you made instead of admitting you cant verify your CGI photo and restating your argument. narcisissm involves selfishness, thats what it take to believe the cartoon globe. also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water? so yeah trip to ice wall isnt likely
>>172610
yes

Oof. The nerve of these globers.

>>172674
>>172675
I apologize for disturb (you) with memes but eloquence is not my strength.

>>172673
>>172674
>>172676
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172677
I'm OP and I just saw activity in this bread. The post >>172673 is not mine.

>>172678
Don't care, image spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172677
>did you verify the meme yourself?
There are more than 2K posts above documenting the plane. What else is needed?

>>172680
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172681
>CGI
According to the own words of a NASA employee, which was already posted in some post above, all pictures from space are CGI.

>>172682
Your memes are too, spammer.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172683
Chillax anon.

>>172684
Spam for spam. A fair trade.
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

um anon, i think your computer is broken

>obviously appealing to your own authority
yes, faggot

>>172687
Why do you post screenshots of things we can all clearly see?
He's repeating himself as a meme.

>>172673
>narcisissm involves selfishness
That's not what narcissism is.
>admitting you cant verify your CGI photo
People have attempted to identify CGI artifacts in those images various times. Nobody has found evidence of CGI or doctoring.
Feel free to examine them yourself though. Post results.
>why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
They can't even stop the Japanese from poaching whales there.
>trip to ice wall isnt likely
People go there for scientific expeditions all of the time. Have you tried doing that?
You can even fly over Antarctica commercially:
https://www.antarcticaflights.com.au/the-worlds-most-unique-scenic-flight
There's one this November. Sign up and post results.

>>172673
>also why wouldnt you think they have the technology to track everyone on the water?
It's not a militarized border, and according to you it's a 49747.75 mile circumference. You think they have armed guards on every mile of it? People go there for illegal fishing/whaling all of the time. People go there for legal science/leisure all of the time. There's permanent settlement cabins there. You can go on vacation there too. Cruiselines pass by it. You can sign up for a trip to Antarctica today.

>>172601
>You realize that "globetards" are ~99% of people, right?
Mmmmmm...

>Star through telescope
How good it is that the normals can have technology and look for themselves.
The three first pics are what the freemasons say above is (pretty CGI to me) versus 4th video what we actually see.

>>172698
What is the 4th even from?

>>172699
The sky.

>>172700
Who took the video? What star is it aimed at?

>>172701
There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.

>>172702
How am I supposed to verify this video if I can't even see where it comes from? Did you verify it? What relation does it have to the NASA stills you posted (which show three completely different pictures)? What am I looking at?
You are such a s hypocrite, it's unreal.

>>172703
>Did you verify it?
How can anypony verify you are not a bot? Huh?
Even further, how you can be sure you are not some subroutine in the Matrix?

>>172704
It was you who brought up verification. You talked about others being unable to verify pictures of earth, and yet now you're posting videos that you yourself haven't verified.
You are a hypocrite.

Are you sure pic 2 even from NASA? I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.

>>172705
>I can't find it anywhere in the galleries.
Dude, why you don't get a proper and decent job instead of taking money from zog to oversee some austists?

>>172707
>hurr durr ur a glowie
I have a job, nigger. And I got all of my work done early, so still have the spare time to call out your faggotry that's been polluting the board I use every day.
You posted three unrelated images, and then compared them to a video depicting an unrelated astrological sight that you can't even name. What were you trying to prove with that?

>>172706
I know how to use Yandex, you absolute troglodyte.

>>172702
>There are lots of videos taken by lots of people at lots of stars. You may browse jewtube or even Odysee or Rumble for details.
I'm talking about this video in particular. What is it from? Where did you get it? Who posted it?

>>172712
>lost argument
There is none. That cunt has a stuck neural path and insist on information she needs to fill her report. So her request is denied.

>>172713
What report?
The argument is that your post didn't make any sense and doesn't prove anything because you're comparing completely unrelated images apples to oranges. You should at least be able to say what the video is from, if you expect anyone to learn anything from it.

How could the earth be flat if it's hollow?
Why isn't this facebook simulator deleted yet?

>>172702
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172713
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172715
Based Hollow Earth schizo. Far more interesting than flat earth.

>>172695
read the definition of narcissism, you think narcissism means controversial postion, it doesnt. you dont know the definiton of narcissism but you brought up the word first, i had to correct you.
i dont have to identify artifacts to point out CGI, because of the fact you never verified the image to be real yourself. Its still objectively CGI for that reason, until you can verify it. they dont care about saving whales lives obviously, they care about hiding resources and treasures. notice how i specifically said cant explore "freely and privately". youre talking about a tour to antarctica in one specific location.
>>172695
entirely false post. it is guarded, there is video evidence of airplanes and boats getting stopped by authorities
>>172705
actually it was me who brought up verification, youre talking to someone else. but yes a verification would be nice because thats the job person posting the pic of cartoon globe
>>172715
dumb take. flat earth faces censorship and deplatforming too, but not ill grant not as much as stuff like holocaust denial or race realism

>>172719
>video evidence
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172720
i asked my question first, so are you gonna verify your obvious CGI cartoon or nah?

>>172719
>you think narcissism means controversial postion
I didn't say that.
>definition of narcissism
Okay, here it is
>excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one's physical appearance.
I.e "everyone is braindead, except for me".
>i dont have to identify artifacts to point out CGI, because of the fact you never verified the image to be real yourself
Others have. Go check.
If I personally verified that the image lacked artifacts by doing it myself, would you consider it real? Tell me before I waste my time.
>until you can verify it
Would you be convinced if I verified it? Will that settle this discussion? Because I'll do it if that's what it'll take.
>youre talking about a tour to antarctica in one specific location
You can go on tours all over the continent. If you went enough times, you would be able to piece it together.
>flat earth faces censorship and deplatforming
Your Facebook group is evidence to the contrary.
You try to talk about Jews on Facebook, and you get banned immediately. You post about flat earth on Facebook, and their algorithm recommends you more.

>>172721
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172723
Remember to sage

>>172722
your definition of narcissism is one definiton, there are mutliple definitions for words. in saying that narcisissism equates to selfishness, there is nothing incorrect about that. its just you coping and being autistic

never did i say you CANT verify thats its CGI, just saying its not needed. your job is to verify the photo, not for flat earthers to un-verify it. everything else you just said is a total lie and full of semantics, starting to wonder if you have jewish DNA

>>172725
>your job to verify
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172726
so you cant verify the curvature to exist yourself? thats all i needed to know. thanks for playing

>>172727
>can't verify the plane to exist yourself?
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172728
>verify
yes. you can verify it yourself like this. altitude baloon camera with different focal points and lense models

>>172729
>more memes
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172730
technically one of them is a diagram not a meme. but you want ignore the observation within the meme and just discard it as a meme

>>172731
>disregarding things because I want to
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

>>172731
Why don't you reply to all of the arguments you've been ignoring? Like how you failed to explain how all of those antipodal flights take the same amount of time, no matter what direction the plane leaves from?

No wait, Anon isn't wrong. There's actual theorician physicists who reconsider the amount of dimensions we really have that WILL explain a lot of things missing in modern cosmology. As one of these could be an illusion, if you follow so far the rest will fuck you up even harder.
Earth and literally everything in the context of modern physics and theoretical models like Minkowski space and accounting in the better comprehension of the spacetime especially Kerr's blackhole in which I'm totally writing a dissertation about, we really have to consider extra dimensions and their implications. Globally the idea of a flat Earth contradicts well-established scientific understanding it isn't completely wrong. (pun intended)

The curvature and shape of extra dimensions, when projected down to three dimensions, could distort our perception of space and form, potentially accommodating a flat Earth model within this extended geometry so the most accurate representation would be closer to a 2d universe with space-time as the third dimension.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gLNlC_hQ3M

By the way you want to get high while you watch this insane science thing the governments don't want you to,
- Grab a jug of bleach, Chlorox or anything in the same kind and pour it into a bowl
- Add the cheapest vinegar into it.
- Add some salt on it
- Inhale, it's gonna clean your nose. Enjoy!

>>172734
you might be replying to the wrong person, but i claimed that all international flights start off going northbound, never south or over antarctica. anyways, you still got more to explain here with your vague argument. what about flights times proves the globe?

>>172608
>>172610
>>172677
>>172679
>>172681
>>172685
>>172703
>>172716
>>172717
>>172720
>>172723
>>172726
>>172728
>>172730
>>172732
>did you verify
You sound like a scratched vinyl or a bot. Definitely there is something really wrong with ya.

>>172737
i guess he is crying about memes because he cant replicate his CGI photo using his own tools and equipment. if someone can verify and replicate the cartoon to be real then ill stop being a flat earther today

>>172738
>i guess he is crying about memes
I suspect this is the same bot crying fool about political memes as well. If you think about it, who are the beings complaining about memes? Who are the beings tracking down memes, memelords, and sources? Who are the beings screaming loud about "misinformation"? Yup, the jews and the SJW crowd. I believe we have a mole among us.

>>172735
>I'm totally writing a dissertation about, we really have to consider extra dimensions and their implications.
And the charlatan pops up.
Anon, theoretical math on a blackboard cannot replace the Scientific Method. If you cannot reproduce it in a lab, it is pseudo science.

>>172737
It's a copy pasta you literal mental midget.
>>172739
>>172738
No, your content just sucks.
You said every piece of evidence had to be verified for CGI and verified or it doesn't count.
Lo' and behold you become salty when confronted by your own standards.
Like clockwork instead of owning up to anything, it's because the users of this site are bad.
Wow.
What a high IQ move.

>>172740
A theory has some data to substantiate its possibility as factual.

The term you should be using is: hypothesis. Which is usually someone coming up with a pigshit eXpLaNaTiOn and looking for both the cause and solution at the same time. Basically Hegelian dialectic, in short.

>>172741
>You said every piece of evidence had to be verified for CGI and verified or it doesn't count.
You are pretty dishonest. The CGI stuff has been confirmed by NASA's employee Robert Simmon, AKA Mr. Blue Marbleand.

>>172743
>a selfie
did you verify the meme yourself? if not then how can you claim its real? youre obviously appealing to your own authority, and CGI is the only thing it can be. not real = therefore fake, and must be CGI

It's always impressive how flattards persists, despise the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They even admit they know it's a lie but defend their retardation as being legit, even if they're wrong they want to be right, I don't know which is worse. The guy who accept to live in delusion and follow the herd, or the mongoloid who just follow and believe it. I'd say it's the kike who started it.

Being some kind of scientist myself (lol) I'm not going to analyze thoroughly the sociology or psychology of the flat earther, but I can relate more into what Renaud Camus expressed in The Small Replacement, cultural and civilization change, engineered and wanted by a certain elite. Camus really expressed the base of the ongoing idiocracy in the west and the goal behind it: Having a dumb, maleable mass of people inapt to think by themselves or being intelligent.

As mentioned in this thread that should be bumped,
>>167485 →
Again, you mongoloids are a minority who fell for a psyop.

This shit is led by trolling, manipulation and made up conspiracy theories. Alex Jones and other controlled oppositions are guilty of this bullshit.
Conspiracy theories can be verified or debunked, just like any theory.
>I have a hypothesis
>I'm making a theory about it
>I'm going to investigate and collect evidence
>Do my theory works and can it be challenged?
>Can it be experimented in real life and replicated? Absolutely.

You don't even pass the >hypothesis without being destroyed by facts and logic. Flat Earthers are simply complete retards, altough being inoffensive but giving credits like a scarecrow as intended, to validate the left's narrative, since all of this is led by some high tier troll. Mostly the left, probably jews, I don't think the CIA is too smart for bullshit like this. I'm not even sure if the I of CIA still means intelligence anymore.

The Flat Earth sect is a symptom of a bigger issue: the proliferation of retardation and the exploitation of genuine curiosity some people have, and the distortion of actual critical thinking into manipulation. Literally for the dosh, which is the same modus operandi as climate alarmists like Oxfam, Extinction Rebellion or the LGBT proceeds to. The leftoid's herd mentality.

You:
>I have doubts against vaccines and would like some actual information not the mainstream bullshit.
>I don't believe climate change is man-made, where can I debunk these shitheads?
The Nigger
>Come join our group we'll explain you why vaccines are 5G remote nanotech and why you have been lied to! Trust me my fellow redpilled patriot! Everything you know is a jew lie! They're everywhere!
>By the way do drugs, smoke weed and open your chakras with special mushrooms and have you read the Quran?

You become the nigger. You fell for it. The manipulators behind these chemtrails, flat earth, moon landing faked by nasa, or pyramid aliens are literally trolls, proliferating and are encouraged on every social network while any discussion on serious topics like vaccines, climate, politics, russian/ukrainian or gender are banned topics. You are not even censored! You exploit a gaping troll of free speech, nigger. (I'm going to go back to it later)

There are people who think they do their own research, ignoring how Google isn't their friend but will bubble you and manipulate you. Retards who subscribe to this belief are really being trolled, and refuse to acknowledge their manipulation and give up by fear of being ridiculed. Resulting in a distorted understanding of basic scientific principles, but hey you're not alone, it's just like teenagers are being manipulated into believing they can change their sex and demand trans rights, and exactly like the media manipulates the masses into believing climate change is anthropogenic.

You, flat earther mongs all have the same mentality as a tranny, the hivemind of a marxist. Do, don't question why, do as others in your group and call yourself an oppressed minority. And since this is what you were taught in these fucking ‘schools’ you cannot reason or have critical thinking, or even question your own beliefs.

Don't defend yourself, you must be insulted, bullied, ridiculed, and raped online by all forms possible, And you should be thankful for giving you retards who can barely read this reply.

Also to close this post, here's a thing to the guy trying to argue with the flat earth mongoloid, why are you even trying, he don't believe his own bullshit as shown in https://mlpol.net/sp/24255#24605, it is like I mentioned : herd mentality.

>>172741
incorrect. what i said is they have to be verified to be real, meaning you have to be able to reproduce the photo, and everyone must have the ability to do so. otherwise its unfalsifiable evidence aka not evidence.
>>172808
starting to wonder if you should seek help. your tangents are just misinformed complaints, this is the adult table here. our discussion is relevant to mainly the scientific method. can you tell us when and where you can see detectable curvature of our ground?

>>172810
>everyone must have the ability to do so.
Anyone who operates the telescope can do that.
>reproduce the photo
Which photo? If you mean multiple photographs of the same stellar body, they've done that.
>your tangents are just misinformed complaints
His complaints are relevant to the conversation and your inability to argue in good faith.

>>172739
>who are the beings complaining about memes?
Complaining about memes is the modus operandum on chansites, you stupid newfag. Go look at any chansite on any board, and that 40-60% of what they do on any given day.
>Who are the beings tracking down memes, memelords, and sources?
Anons.
>misinformation
Nobody uses that term here.
>I believe we have a mole among us.
>implying everyone every other active user on the site is a mole

>>172811
telescopes point at the sky, not the ground. try again
>which photo?
thats been my question the entire time. waiting for which photo is going to show the evidence for curve

>>172813
>telescopes point at the sky, not the ground. try again
Which photo are you referring to then? You posted several.

>>172813
>waiting for which photo is going to show the evidence for curve
How about a picture of the earth from space, run through the best digital forensics software to confirm no CGI artifacts?

>>172814
i already told you, im asking the same question about "which photo". i didnt post any curvature photos
>>172815
space has never been proven to exist, just another presumption you expect me to buy. and please go over every possible method that exists for finding CGI artifacts, that must take quite a while. but surely you have the patience. but because thats too silly and dumb to do, we can just cut to the chase and say unreplicable, call it a day. what can be asserted without backing can be dismissedd without backing

>>172816
>i didnt post any curvature photos
Then why did you bring up CGI, in the contest of posting images of galaxies and nebula, if it wasn't relevant to your point?
>please go over every possible method that exists for finding CGI artifacts, that must take quite a while. but surely you have the patience.
If I did that, would you accept the result?
>but because thats too silly and dumb to do
You asked for verification of the images. Is that not what you want?
>we can just cut to the chase and say unreplicable, call it a day
No. I could verify it. It would take me a few hours, but I could do that. Is that what you're asking me to do?

>>172817
i meant CGIs of cartoon globe earth, not CGIs of space and galaxies. you dont see stars in the globe earth cartoon, just pitch black. which should really raise an eyebrow, but not for you for some reason, you find some excuse even though there are no excuses for it with modern photo/video technology.
>would you accept the results?
not the discussion worth having here, im more curious to know why you dont care to verify it through replication

>>172818
>you dont see stars in the globe earth cartoon, just pitch black. which should really raise an eyebrow, but not for you for some reason
We already discussed this. Scroll up.
>not the discussion worth having here
A simple yes or no would suffice.
I'm asking you, because I want to know if it's worth it for me to do all of that work, or if you'll just ignore it, like you did after I did all of that math demonstrating that all of the antipodal flights between Jakarta and Bogota taking the same amount of time no matter what direction they leave from could not be possible on a flat earth and are in themselves evidence that the earth is round.
>im more curious to know why you dont care to verify it through replication
What, by flying to space? People do that all of the time, and they take photos of the experience every time. Of course, you dismiss them all as CGI (without even attempting to analyze them for it).

>>172818
What moment in your life did you decide to become a retard?

>>172808
Bruh, seems like you're not quite seeing the big picture dropping this, unlike you we respect your right to your opinions but let's get a few things straight. Just becouse we ask legit questions and try to help you see the truth doesnt mean you can act like a self entitled cunt. Unlike you I believe in our freedom, but you hate America, your thread on /sp/ shows your hate for America. Your tweets attacks Americans all the time. So hear me out and listen up, I'd take a decade of Biden for president over anyone who would infrige my rights to believe what I want no matter how real or not they are and rule what I think.
You defend these elites, you're placed by elites, You got your science and diplomas no one gives a fuck about, and I'm really going to be questioning who got you here in this place for. See those in power they've got their reasons for pushing this round Earth narrative. The Jewish world have always been fighting against Muslims who had real scientists and real astronomers without any tech and they know earth is flat. As you talk about drugs who made them illegal? If everyone could access weed and microdosing on psilo shrooms and other natural meds the world would be much better. By the way I'm also concerned about climate as you claim it's not serious, me I care for our mother nature people like you aims to destroy, regardless the shape of Earth. I told you if you paid attention, Shape of Earth isn't about absolute truth, it's about questioning what you have learned and believe as the reality they forced you to grow up with. you will drown us with evidence but who's providing that evidence? even if you do I just can ignore it. You also collect and research evicence but it's for you to question if all of this is real as you search for proof and find problems in every image, you can't trust what you were taught being reality. I'm getting old, I'm almost thirty and I've seen enough to question the official story. I'd rather be awake and aware than blindly following along with their agenda.

>>172821
>I told you if you paid attention, Shape of Earth isn't about absolute truth, it's about questioning what you have learned and believe as the reality they forced you to grow up with.
Are you implying it doesn't matter if it's true or not? We've been debating the truth all this time.

Also, lets revisit the topic of flights from Jakarta and Bogota. No CGI, no pictures, not expert testimony. Just independently verifiable flight arrivals/departures, paths, and math.

>>172819
Why're you making such a big fuss defending your worldview? We're just trying to open your eyes to reality here and break through the bullshit you were taught. when you call us manipulated and indoctrinated, but maybe I've got better values than those telling you to buy into their version of things. Did you verify this? research that! I mean, come on now, can't you at least consider the other side and have a more neutral thinking cause there's plenty of counter evidence out there if you'd take a moment to look at them. but oh no, you're too smart for that, right? It ain't about who's right or wrong its about being willing to see beyond what they want you to see, give it a shot. I give you unlike the frenchie you don't wish to exterminate people who think differently.

>>172822
first off why do learning the sahpe of earth really matters? I get how you try hard to bring proof of your opinion. It's not just about the shape of the Earth that really matters, it's the reality they've shoved down our throats I want to help you all questioning in this thread. now, when it comes to those flights from Jakarta to Bogota sure we can talk about paths but let's not forget something deeper here even if I don't know a lot of planes who really travels there. A counterargument like I said in Islam and other cultures they've got their own beliefs about the shape of the Earth. It's all about perspective, why do you stick with the specific one that was broguht up by freemasons, jews and jesuits? It's about breaking free from the constraints of what they want us to think. Who's to say their version of truth is the only one, you can bring any authority and scientists you want with proofs you want, it's about being string and not being influenced by anyone's narrative or worldview. I want you tlo keep questioning! who knows what we might uncover if we dare to step outside that box they've put us in. It's all about seeking truth, even if it's a bit unconventional. So, let's keep the conversation going and not attack anyone's status ok? We're on the same boat here, I am trying to help, others here are trying to make you think and not repeat what you learn or what you see.

>>172823
>when you call us manipulated and indoctrinated
I never called you that.
>making such a big fuss defending your worldview?
You're arguing on a chansite. Grow a pair.
Maybe if you didn't leave questions unanswered and weren't so asinine in your conversation, then maybe Anons wouldn't be so annoyed with you.
It's not even about what you believe. Swede Anon apparently agrees, but people like Swede Anon because Swede Anon argues in good faith, and his posts contribute the the quality of this board. He doesn't resort to calling people shills/bots/glowies/kikes/women when he's losing an argument.
>at least consider the other side and have a more neutral thinking cause there's plenty of counter evidence out there
I can say the same for you. Moreso even. What about the antipodal flights, for example? What about the distances NEAR Antarctica (they don't guard the entire southern hemisphere) which according to the flat earth model should be much greater, but are in reality much closer together?
>if you'd take a moment to look at them.
I've been analyzing, debating and rebuking every piece of "evidence" you've shown me in this thread. Unlike you, I don't leave questions unanswered.
>It ain't about who's right or wrong its about being willing to see beyond what they want you to see, give it a shot.
No. It is about right and wrong. If it's literally, unironically true, idgaf who wants me to believe it. I call out their lies whenever I see evidence for it, and theorize other ways they could be lying to me, but I don't change my beliefs based on pure contrarianism.
.
.
.
And I can see that, despite replying to my post, you didn't answer any of my fucking questions, yet again. You do this all of the time, talking past them without listening or responding to their questions, and you wander why so many posters on this site despise you.

>>172825
>first off why do learning the sahpe of earth really matters?
Knowing the nature of the world is beneficial to society.
>It's not just about the shape of the Earth that really matters
>hurr durr, the truth doesn't matter
Smoothe brain take.
>when it comes to those flights from Jakarta to Bogota sure we can talk about paths but let's not forget something deeper
Let's do that then.
>I don't know a lot of planes who really travels
You don't need to. You just need some highschool level geometry/arithmetic, and maybe a piece of paper. Maybe even get a tape measure and wrap it around a ball, and then try to simulate the same distance four times on a circular map from different directions.
>A counterargument like I said in Islam and other cultures they've got their own beliefs about the shape of the Earth
I don't consider medieval Muslims to be credible when it comes to science and metaphysics.
>why do you stick with the specific one that was broguht up by [buzzwords]
Because that's the one with the best evidence.
>It's about breaking free from the constraints of what they want us to think.
I care about what's true, not who wants me to think it. People in charge lie to me all the time, and I call out their lies. That doesn't mean they can't also say true things.
>version of truth is the only one
We live in the same reality. We live on the same planet. There is one truth about the nature and shape of this planet: one of us is right, and one of us is wrong.
>not being influenced by anyone's narrative or worldview
If you believe something for no reason other than that someone else told you to believe the opposite, you are still being influenced by them.
>I want you tlo keep questioning
I do that all of the time, all over this board.
>So, let's keep the conversation going
Then answer the questions and stop distracting people with these tangents.

>>172823
>maybe I've got better values than those telling you to buy into their version of things
You have not demonstrated those values this far.
>if you'd take a moment to look at them
What do you think we've been doing in this thread all this time?

>gets asked to defend himself
>Switches gears to "it actually doesn't matter what's true"
Holy fuck, is this nigger serious?

>>172819
you went to space? hooknose detected

>>172808
>The manipulators behind these chemtrails, flat earth, moon landing faked by nasa, or pyramid aliens are literally trolls, proliferating and are encouraged on every social network while any discussion on serious topics like vaccines, climate, politics, russian/ukrainian or gender are banned topics. You are not even censored! You exploit a gaping troll of free speech, nigger. (I'm going to go back to it later)
Yeah, you make a very good point about well-poisoning. This shit up sharply in 2020-2021, when lockdowns forced normie boomers onto the Internet. I swear part of it is the launch of new psychological warfare methods, basically Project Mockingbird 2.0. They realized that they couldn't fully quell conspiracy theories that would emerge as people questioned the authority of ZOG during the lockdowns, so they decided to simply flood free speech venues with bullshit and algorithmically promote insultingly-untrue narratives to distract people with ridiculous nonsense and demoralize skeptics. It causes people to be pushed away from legitimate skeptics, and more sinisterly, it causes people to give up and feel like they can't believe in anything anymore, so that they just go about their lives and stop trying to find the truth. As flattie puts it
>It's not just about the shape of the Earth that really matters, it's the reality they've shoved down our throats
These retards don't care about the truth anymore. They only care about contrarianism, to feel like they're free because they're actually based schizos among sheeple because they choose to disbelieve the reality that the rest of the world has accepted as fact, not because it is false, but because they feel special that they don't believe it. These people don't do anything significant to take down the regimes that oppress us all and brainwash our children, nor do they have any kind of power: they're not a threat to ZOG, but they believe they are because they believe in a conspiracy about the shape of the earth. It's like opium, keeping people from discovering real conspiracies that they can take action against by making them feel special.
>>172830
I didn't say that, you illiterate nigger. I know reading comprehension isn't your strongsuit, but you could try a bit harder once in a while.

>>172830
Respond to the point about the antipodal flights.
It starts around here >>169460 to >>169499
It seems as though a flattie came to the conclusion that the world was shaped like an orange in >>169491 , except, what are oranges shaped like? They're not flat disks; they're spheres.

>>172823
>bumps thread with bait memes
>calls people who disagree with him shills
>ignores sound arguments and conveniently forgets previous points
>"Why're you making such a big fuss"
The audacity of this nigger.

>>172826
here we go again with the accusations and insults. Aint that crazy how as soon someone talks a sensitive topic everyone around unites as one to push us down? It's so tiresome.
So you even realize how like you're always attacking whenever we defend our views like its something so sacred to you, with your blind skepticism and refusal to see beyond the lies they feed you!
I'm not some fucking sheep, I have questions, I have doubts more than you could possibly imagine but you know what's worse? The feeling that no matter what evidence we present, you'll always find a way to dismiss it. It's infuriating! It's insane the efforts they all put to shove and attack.
I cant believe being on this thread for so long making fun of globeheads trying to put some sense and some will to question reality but deeply depressing on the long term. It's not even about politics, I'm not even feeling comfortable with the death threats and all kind of shit I've read recently.
>>172827
But again, do any of you globeheads ever stop to question yourself before hurling accusations? There's so much weird shit happening in the world right now, and you're just brushing it all aside like it's nothing!
Look at the horrors of Zionism, the manipulation by powerful forces—it's all real, and it fills me with rage, have you seen the people protesting against Israel? Have you seen what's happening in Palestine again? All of the world is complicit of their crimes, USA, UK, EU, Russia. All united against us. when will you understand what's going on?

>>172831
And here you are clinging to your mainstream narrative like it's your only lifeline, your cherished facts, your beloved universe well now guess what some of us actually care about truth and not your truth! People are waking up, if you are too dumb and brainwashed.
It's not just about the shape of the Earth again, it's about challenging everything they want us to believe.
Free energy is possible but is hidden. Medecine and everything to help us are around in nature but are hidden. History is a big lie. No one knows who really controls the world.
Most if not everything you see in the media is fake and especially in the cuckservative zionist media, nothing is done to stop climate change, nothing is done to protect the poor, HAARP technology is a weapon against the world and has been userd everytime a nation oppose their world. CERN holds a satanic or some weird shit when there was the eclipse no one knows what they are doing there again. but it's not your business. NASA, Musk and China and especially Putin are liars and will reinforce the fake competition to keep everyone under control as they planned since the beginning. All rockets explodes at the firmament, it's been documented, explorers built a rocket not faking it and hit the firmament and died on impact, that's real science.
But you wouldn't understand, would you? You're too blinded by your own ignorance, scared of facing the truth even, in denial, I went through this too, I cried, I rejected the truth, it was painful, it is paintful to realize even your family lied to you, people you trusted lied to you. You're almost there, you will throw up, I am willing to help but you're all so stubborn. Reality will scare the shit out of you, I'm even fearing for my life for posting thids now I no longer trust this place to protect truth. You love your comfort and not responding questions thinking there is nothing here to see.
And don't even get me started on the southern hemisphere and the South Pole. You think it's all open for exploration? Think again! It's all locked down by international treaties, hidden from us by those in power. You will never be able to go to the south pole, no one will, or never come back.
The ones who dare to seek truth beyond the lies, know this. And I no longer trust this place anymore. But go ahead, keep spouting your mainstream nonsense. You're just another puppet dancing to their tune, while the rest of us are left to grapple with the unsettling reality they try to bury. Wake up, open your eyes, and maybe just maybe we can start unraveling the web of deception together. And you will be glad we had this conversation, we should be friends and not enemies.
I want you to wake the fuck up, leave your pony porn, leave this place and do honest research, others have dropped links and information for you to forge yourself an opinion. Let us help you.

>>172830
You mean being filmed in a pool or with wires attached in some basement, or Bezos's fake rockets with flat screens used as windows?

>>172832
>flatearth.ws infograph that strawmans the flat earth position using a model we dont claim
wow, not my first time seeing that

>psyop: the website
waiting for them to walk me through on verifying curvature via repeatable experiment

>>172823
>>172825
>It's just about opening your mind dude.
>Objective reality? No dude this is all about psychological stuff about questioning what might be true is it really true?
>What do you mean philosophy wouldn't be as retarded as all we're doing.
>Duuude this isn't about proving what we say is true, it's just yah know questioning shit.
>Cause how do you even know what is true duuude?
>Just change what you know because how could you even know bro? Just show a curve.
>No, no, no that doesn't count as a curve.
Oh my God. You're all just doing shitty philosophy and deliberately trying to murder how anybody tries to find anything out.

>it's just like teenagers are being manipulated into believing they can change their sex and demand trans rights
There are legit transgender people
>and exactly like the media manipulates the masses into believing climate change is anthropogenic.
See? I see you a distrust in science you're supporting and it's making things interesting because it's the opposite.
Climate change would not be a real issue or not even noticeable if the world was spherical but it is an issue and climate scientists being worried about it are the evidence there is something you're omitting. Because threy know and they don't tell the whole truth. If Earth were spherical heat would be distributed across and no one would be worried, but If you were a serious scientist thinking critically, you should account this possibility. A spinning Earth would have no climate problem, it becomes one because there is nowhere for CO2 to escape.

>>172835
I hate how these are being shilled, but being convincing, and this is why it's important to educate and not tell people "just research flat earth" there's a LOT of things to take in account, they made this and many sites or videos just in order to be debunked.

Every comment I left on this place for a long time have been removed, leaving out the trolls and globeheads debunking blindlessly, some don't even read the posts and it's like they have all the elements to debunk it.

So you're trying all so hard to take us down you're all embarrassing yourselves, look how they even send their best shills[agents] on obscure chanboards like this one. Friends, don't let yourself controlled again, look how they're trying hard.

>>172835
>ad Homenim
Address the argument.
It is not a straw man, but if it is, feel free to explain how it is.
Regardless, how is it that a plane can leave in four completely different directions, and arrive at the same destination in the same amount of time? This is completely unfeasible on a flat, disk-shaped earth, but it makes perfect sense on a round earth.
People make these flights all of the time, and thousands of people have taken the journey. The planes are visible from the ground and their journeys can be tracked in real time. This is an independently verifiable event that involves no "CGI" pictures or scientific mumbo jumbo: it is basic math and geometry that demonstrates something that is completely impossible on a flat earth, but happens anyway all of the time.
>>172836
You tried this before, to dismiss the argument entirely by the source of the idea. I provided links to independent sources that all show the same amount of time from planes leaving in completely different directions. I explained it very clearly how this was only possible on a round earth.

Tell me, how do you think this very real and probable event is possible on a round earth. It should be easy to draw lines on a circular map from one point to the other. If you can draw four mostly-straight lines that connect the two flight locations with similar length, despite leaving from different directions (90 degrees or more difference), I'll be incredibly impressed.

>>172836
See >>148613
>This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
So do it. Debunk the psyop. Prove us wrong.
How is it that planes flying straight in four different directions from the same point can arrive at the same destination with similar travel times? How is that possible on a flat earth?

>>172838
>Climate change would not be a real issue or not even noticeable if the world was spherical
Elaborate. What does that have to do with the shape of the earth?
>There are legit transgender people
No there aren't.
>If Earth were spherical heat would be distributed across and no one would be worried
That would just mean that the whole world would get hotter.
>it becomes one because there is nowhere for CO2 to escape
CO2 doesn't escape for the same reason that the rest of the atmosphere doesn't escape: the earth has a powerful magnetic field that protects it from the solar wind. Gas is effected by gravity too.
Video related.
I don't really care if you choose to believe climate change or not, but using it as evidence of the earth being flat is preposterous.
>don't even read the posts
I read them.
>it's like they have all the elements to debunk it
The elements are easy to find because the arguments are bad.
>So you're trying all so hard to take us down
You post bad arguments, I respond to bad arguments. Fuck around and find out.
>you're all embarrassing yourselves
Lol, lmao even. You're getting clowned on.
>look how they even send their best shills[agents] on obscure chanboards like this one
Oh, so we're all shills just because we disagree?
I've been using this site since day one. You only arrived during the wave of pandemic internet cancer.
>look how they're trying hard
Funny how you take eloquent, well researched arguments as evidence of your low-effort memespam being correct. Maybe other people on this site just care more about making good arguments than you.

>>172840
>ad hominem
you dont know what that means apparently
no planes have EVER done the bullshit like you claim. no such flight path exists of going around the full circumference of the ball. also, your flight paths argument relies on strawmanning a model, so idk why you repeated the same shit twice when i already told you the first time

>>172841
again, planes dont and never do this, there is no such flight route that goes around the entire circumference of a ball in a perfectly straight direction.