[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / cyb / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]

/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1502146623040-0.png (261.23 KB, 405x818, An Explosive Meteorite.png)

File: 1502146623040-1.png (92.85 KB, 200x266, 1871ufo.png)

File: 1502146623040-2.jpg (22.84 KB, 409x599, the_great_comet_of_1881.jpg)

File: 1502146623040-3.jpg (56.75 KB, 500x356, sanfranciscocall17nov1896-….jpg)

File: 1502146623040-4.jpg (63.55 KB, 512x483, 1897mystery-airship.jpg)

7b706 No.750[View All]

This post is inspired by >>>/mlpol/59382.

I have been researching UFOs and aliens for decades. I have found the best way to understand the phenomena is to time-line it and then see what else was happening around the same time. Time-lining it allows the evolution & origin of certain aspects to show up which means you can trace things back to origin points.

I don't concern myself with if each UFO/alien report is real or not real, but I look at it in a wide ranging meta-view and this shows a sensible evolution which implies it is real and therefore the reports are generally mostly real.

I am not sure what the best way is to do this data dump. I have decided to do a succinct 300 year history which can be expanded on by me asking questions. This allows me to keep my efforts in proportion to actual board interest levels.

This initial section is to show the development of human sky technology and also shows that nothing ET UFO like is happening yet.

1758 - Book: Concerning Earths in the Solar System, in which Emanuel Swedenborg detailed his alleged journeys (spiritual) to the inhabited planets (up to Saturn + 5 exo-planets), solar system barrier, suns are black.
1783 - France: Manned balloons
1803 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utsuro-bune
1850 - and onwards triangular shapes are reported in the sky but when researched most of these can be associated with comets and comet fragments (comets tend to break up near Earth, Sun and Jupiter into sharp angular fragments).
1851 - Dr. William Bland sent design: steam engine driving twin propellers suspended under airship to Great Exhibition, London
1852 - Comet fragment dramatically crashes to Earth with sheets of rain (comet water) and dark ominous clouds with read streaks before the massive chunk crashes into the English channel. The other interesting part about this is that it happens near dawn, and the dawn side of the Earth is in the direction of the Earth's travel around the sun. So the Earth overran this comet fragment and sucked it down into it. This dramatically shows how astronomical phenomena can produce UFO reports. Pic #1 Attached.
1863 - “Aereon” by Solomon Andrews (inventor) flew, unpowered, controllable dirigible,Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
1871 - Mystery airship, Mt. Washington, New Hampshire (Solomon Andrews?) See Pic #2. This is one of the earliest UFO reports and we can see it is consistent with an airship. We have no reason to conclude it is ET yet.
1871 - (Vril, the Power of) The Comming Race fiction novel by Edward Bulwer-Lytton. This book in Germany inspires the use of the term Vril for unknown magical/physical forces and leads to the nick name The Vril Society.
1881 - a comet was mistaken as an unusual object in the sky. See pic #3.
1886 - Book: A Dweller on Two Planets, Atlantis, life on Venus, advanced technology, karma, Mt. Shasta. “No telescope will ever reveal human life on Venus; not that it is not there, but its forms are of the One Substance effected by a range of force rendering them imperceptible to earthly eyes." – what we see here is the myth of sentient life on other planets in our solar system starting to form. There is no reason to reject this notion at that time.
1886 - cheap way to manufacture aluminium is discovered. At this point airships are flying around, some are secret projects. They use bamboo and cloth and ropes. Cheap aluminium allows them to be made of this metal. France is becoming a leader in airship design. You can think of these airships as the B2 bomber of the day, these are very serious military tech for spying and air to ground attack. Therefore there is secrecy around designs as well.
1891 - Contactee Thomas Blott (William Simpson, 1828-1910) The Man from Mars is a book about a Martian explaining how Mars is great and Earth sux, basically. It is not clear if this was supposed to be fiction or a reported event.
1893 - In the article “Man of the Year Million”, H. G. Wells envisaged humanity transformed into a race of grey-skinned beings, stunted and with big heads. – the greys!!

So with that look so far we can see many of the elements of aliens and UFOs exist but there are no reports yet of flying saucers or any meaningful reports of flying triangles under intelligent control. All of it, when it comes to ETs, is human imagination. We can reasonably say no ETs are showing up in this 1700s-1800s time period.

In 1893 science starts to speculate about gravity and if we can understand it better and control it.

1893 - Oliver Heaviside makes paper called A GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY http://sergf.ru/Heavisid.htm – this will be very important as we continue the time lining.
1894 “Aug 26, British admiral reported sighting a large disk with a projection like a tail” – Keyhoe (1950) – Airship? Science experiment? There are no good references for this report and so it can't be examined further.
1896 - Germany 11 Sep, Zagreb daily newspaper Obzor “The day before yesterday we received a telegram sent by an amateur journalist. He informed us that David Schwarz from Zagreb has invented an [aluminium] airship which he hopes he could direct on his own free will."
1896 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_airship – this is the UFO flap of 1896-97 but they were airships, not disks, triangles or spacecraft. We know that airships won't work in space so these are human-made. This shows that human advanced tech can be a unsolved mystery. See pics #4 and #5

515 posts and 491 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

7b706 No.106844

>Could this be a 3 year cool down of the debris from red-hot to silver cold superconductors?

The argument against a 1943 collision is the great sunspots start in 1946 on one side of Mercury and the Ghost Rockets on Earth on the other side of Mercury.

A more encompassing hypothesis would be that Mercury collisions are caused by orbiting rocks loosing momentum and spiralling closer to the sun. The best explanation for this is minor collisions in the Asteroid Belt. This could give us the relatively minor amount of Foo Fighters pre-1946 and then the main event 1946-1947.

7b706 No.106898

File: 1564551138693-0.pdf (5.43 MB, 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.023….pdf)

File: 1564551138693-1.png (67.43 KB, 800x800, 800px-Mercury's_orbital_re….png)

>Mercury. First question: how negligible IS Mercury's electromagnetic capture field?

0.006 of Earth, less than 1%. Also worth noting that at Mercury closeness 2002 XM35 would be travelling at ~50km/s (180,000 km/h), and Mercury is travelling at ~40km/s. Collision is at about 10km/s (36,000km/h). It seems unlikely a magnetic field has much input on the collision point, perhaps on the debris though.

>There is a High Magnesium Region & a Low Magnesium Region.

The Caloris Basin.
>Caloris Planitia is a plain within a large impact basin on Mercury, informally named Caloris, about 1,550 km (960 mi) in diameter.[1] It is one of the largest impact basins in the Solar System. "Calor" is Latin for "heat" and the basin is so-named because the Sun is almost directly overhead every second time Mercury passes perihelion. The crater, discovered in 1974, is surrounded by the Caloris Montes, a ring of mountains approximately 2 km (1.2 mi) tall.

Attaching a science paper also which shows the Mg free Caloris Basin.

Second question: is 'electromorphogenic field' theory correct since HMR impacts occur during waning planet cycle-sun cycle rotations & LMR occurs during upswings?

I can't find anything mentioning 'electromorphogenic field', dead end. And no because every second Mercury orbit, Mercury is 180 degrees rotated. Therefore repetitious events at the same location in orbit would make 2 regions on the Mercury surface 180 degree opposite each other. Their is no explanation which allows both repetition and one surface feature on Mercury (unless the repetition fluked being in a multiple of 2x88 days exactly and did not drift over time, unlikely.)

>Mercury is tidally locked with the Sun in a 3:2 spin-orbit resonance,[15] and rotates in a way that is unique in the Solar System. As seen relative to the fixed stars, it rotates on its axis exactly three times for every two revolutions it makes around the Sun.[a][16] As seen from the Sun, in a frame of reference that rotates with the orbital motion, it appears to rotate only once every two Mercurian years. An observer on Mercury would therefore see only one day every two Mercurian years.


(pic) from wikipedia shows this well.

7b706 No.106899

>Either I interpreted the data wrong or the dataset was wrong. Seems mixture of both. >>106459 shows oddly high % sulphur abundance. Which Mercury-glanced swarm features highest sulphur percentages?

>The input of meteoric sulphur (S) into the Earth's atmosphere has been usually considered negligible compared to the surface emissions in terms of mesospheric and stratospheric impacts.

-- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AGUFMSA51A2410G/abstract

So S in meteors is considered negligible, this paper wonders if the sulphur went to the poles though.

But I may have made a slight error suggesting that this excess S near the sun is from leached asteroids only, because there is a massive source of Sulphur near the sun…. Mercury itself.

>Mercury appears to have a solid silicate crust and mantle overlying a solid, iron sulfide outer core layer, a deeper liquid core layer, and a solid inner core.


Scraping the silicate crust off Mercury would expose iron sulphide (of which there are many types: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_sulfide ) to space. And then there is the possibility that the sulphur near the sun is part of historical solar system creation. Nature gives near infinite choices leaving us bewildered.

7b706 No.106900

>Nickel was present from 43PPM to 49PPM
density 8.8
>copper was present at 55PPM to 61PPM,
density 9.0
>chromium at 68PPM to 72PPM,
density 7.2
>manganese at 59PPM to 61PPM
density 6.0
>while titanium was discovered to have a surprising amount from 324PPM to 403PPM.
density 4.5

Because titanium alloys have high tensile strength to density ratio,[11] high corrosion resistance,[7] fatigue resistance, high crack resistance,[72] and ability to withstand moderately high temperatures without creeping, they are used in aircraft, armour plating, naval ships, spacecraft, and missiles.[7][8] For these applications, titanium is alloyed with aluminium, zirconium, nickel,[73] vanadium, and other elements to manufacture a variety of components including critical structural parts, fire walls, landing gear, exhaust ducts (helicopters), and hydraulic systems. In fact, about two thirds of all titanium metal produced is used in aircraft engines and frames.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titanium#Aerospace_and_marine

Atmosheric re-entry burn up of man-made satelites/aerospacecraft?

>1.9 to 3.7% hydrogen } ?

>4.2 to 5.9% hydrogen } ?

>43-51% carbon makeup,

did they bury the pilots remains? … or graphite

>with no detectable amounts of sodium

>or silicon elements present.
density 2.6

No silicon argues against space rocks.

Are these elements and ratio of then consistent with craft? Is there a standard burn up de-orbit path? Can regular use of said path cause this?

7b706 No.106901

Fleet of UFO'S - July, 2019

7b706 No.107136

File: 1564759187776.jpg (42.13 KB, 600x338, Wasp121b.jpg)

>Hubble spots a football-shaped planet leaking heavy metals into space

>And WASP-121b’s extreme heat is totally new. That’s what allows not just light gases like hydrogen and helium, but even heavy metals like iron and magnesium, to stream away. Usually, these heavier materials stay condensed in a planet’s lower atmosphere, even at scorching temperatures. But WASP-121b’s 4,600 degrees Fahrenheit [2538C] is enough to loft even heavy metals high into the atmosphere, where the planet appears to be losing them.

-- http://www.astronomy.com/news/2019/08/hubble-spots-a-football-shaped-planet-leaking-heavy-metals-into-space

>A meteor impact can reach up to 2370C on Earth


ac095 No.107179

Obscure technological achievements:
-first wired voice message pager developed in May, 1949. Based on OSS works from 1943-48, taken over by La Sia.
-first wireless voice/text pager debuted in March, 1950 for Jew-S Royal Crown Marine, Chair Farce, Navy usage. Range: 35-50 miles (ground), 150-300 miles (sea).
-first long ranged wireless text/text-to-voice pager debuted in January 1951. Range: 60-100 miles (ground), 200-400 miles (sea).
-first multi-level (battalion) command pager system debuted in June 1952. Range: 150-200 miles (ground), 400-800 miles (sea).

Information was being transmitted on otherwise secure OSS/La Sia/Pissad/MI5/MI6 channels 2 decades before civil technologies "caught up". Fuck coincidences.

7b706 No.107205

>Understanding the physical processes that release atoms and molecules from Mercury's surface into its exosphere (highly tenuous atmosphere) has been a major challenge because it is difficult to observe Mercury from the ground or Earth's orbit. From its orbit around the planet, the Mercury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging mission provided the first detailed view of Mercury's surface composition and its space environment. Because Mercury is an airless body, its exosphere must constantly be replenished, and it has been assumed that it is directly sourced from the planet's surface. However, a direct observation connecting the surface and the exosphere was not possible until the Mercury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging mission. Using observations of exospheric magnesium (Mg) and colocating them with a Mg‐rich region of Mercury's surface shows for the first time that such a link exists. The results suggest that incoming micrometeoroid particles (dust) can access the surface crustal composition directly and release Mg atoms into the surrounding environment. Our work will inform future exospheric models and provide insights into airless body processes for both other solar system objects and Mercury‐like exoplanets.


7b706 No.107577

File: 1565092273693-0.jpg (219.14 KB, 1209x967, 309YR-Empires.jpg)

File: 1565092273693-1.jpg (59.82 KB, 685x472, srep15689-f6.jpg)

Mercury collision hypothesis (as the main cause) is dead.

I was bored and so I decided to start looking at geological science papers in the hopes of discovering some mention of natural thermite. I did a search for magnesium at https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch? and discovered >>107205 and then:


>Although the HMR covers approximately 15% of Mercury's surface, its origin is not obvious. It does roughly correspond to a depression with thin crust, which previously led to the hypothesis that it is an ancient impact crater that was large enough to excavate mantle material, which, in rocky planets, is rich in magnesium relative to their crust. Here we use a model to simulate how such a crater would look and compare the results to data collected by MESSENGER. We find that the processes required to erase clear physical signs of an HMR‐scale crater should also have erased the strong chemical signature of the HMR. Thus, we conclude that the HMR is more likely due to high‐temperature volcanism than a mantle‐excavating impact.


>Consequently, the high‐Mg region is more likely to be the product of high‐temperature volcanism sourced from a chemically heterogeneous mantle than the remains of a large impact event.

Basically, the valley of the HMR doesn't look like a large crater despite being low. And any, over time, erosion of large crater features would also have removed the Mg as well.

They suggest the high Mg is from a high Mg section of the mantel under the thin crust. But the important part is that if an impact occurred in 1946, the large crater features should still be visible, but they aren't. In contrast, the Caloris Basin is a huge crater said to be millions of years old.

How to rescue the hypothesis?

I ponder that a collision was not involved and it was a close flyby break up. If 2002 XM35 is our proxy and it's orbit is 3.57 years, and Mercury is 87.97 days then how often would the close flyby break up occur?

The break up might include fracturing the thin HMR valley crust exposing Mg rich mantel leading to volcanism. Which might then get pulled along in 2002 XM35's wake or pushed up due to pressure, or 2002 XM35 might bring its own Mg and splashed Mercury on the flyby.

I then wondered how to test for these flybys. If I times the days of Mercury orbit by the days of 2002 XM35 orbit and then divide that by 365.24, I get 314 years for repeating flybys. This sounded suspiciously close the weather cycles >>106754 and Armstrong's civilization cycles (pic1). I then decided to look at 1946 - 314 = year 1632. Looking at the history of UFOs and meteors showed nothing similar to 1946/7 in the 1620-1630s time frame. A dead end. So I decided the ~300 year cycle of Armstrong/weather/sun needed a deeper look.

>"Heartbeat of the Sun from Principal Component Analysis and prediction of solar activity on a millenium timescale"

-- https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15689

This is an awesome paper where scientists looked at the sun spot cycle with software to attempt to tease out the components that lead to the rise and fall of sun spots. They discovered 8 "Principal Components", which I will rename, 8 cycles within the sun. There may be more. However, thankfully, 97% of sun spot activity could be explained by 2 of those cycles.

By plotting the in-phase and out-of-phase effects of these 2 cycles they discover:

>The summary curve reveals a superposition of the amplitudes of the two dynamo waves, or a ‘beating’ effect creating two resulting waves: one of higher frequency (corresponding to a classic 22-year cycle)* and a second wave of lower frequency (corresponding to a period of about 350–400 years)^, which modulates the amplitude of the first wave. It appears that this grand cycle has a variable length from 320 years (in 18–20 centuries) to 400^ (in 2300–2700) predicted for the next millennium. Amplitudes in the shorter grand cycles are much higher than the amplitudes in the longer ones.

* the 22 year cycle is 2 of the 11 year sun spot cycles. Each alternate 11 year sun spot cycle has the poles reversed. Therefore a complete cycle is 2 x 11 years.

+ the 320-450 year cycle is the Armstrong-civilization/weather cycle, and what these scientists call the "grand [solar] cycle".

The maths allows the prediction of sun spots, and therefore the sun's magnetic field strength, which comes from the convection layer(s), which comes from the core's heat. In short it predicts the solar output. Solar output affects the weather (ice/snow, plant growth) which in turn affects the sustainability of a civilization. A starving, economically failing civilization can't be civilized.

But what has this to do with UFOs? I have shown in >>102272 that sun spots and UFOs correlate. And that the 1946/7 exceptional UFO waves were preceded by the very first exceptional Great Sunspot of January 29, 1946 with it's metallic prominence. If Mercury did not initiate the launching of a massive amount of Mg into space, did the sun? Can the sun eject metal?

How does 1946/7 compare on the chart produced by the scientists? pic2 shows that the sun's churn was at it's highest during the Ghost Rockets and Flying Discs. At >>101892 scientists talk about a metallic prominence over the Great Sunspot. In >>104637 shows metallic prominenses was a reference to actual metal. And historically:

>The earth placed beside them [sun spots] would be but a speck, and yet they are mere pits in the surface of the sun, filled perhaps with partially cooled metallic vapors, which have been It is worth cast up from the interior, and are settling back again.

-- Popular Science Monthly Volume 31 (1887), page 492 - https://archive.org/details/popularsciencemo31newy/page/490

Does the sun go through a period every ~350 years of throwing out metal? Can we test this? What if we look at the previous grand cycle? (pic2)


7b706 No.107578

File: 1565094357265-0.gif (97.18 KB, 688x535, Nucleosynthesis_in_a_star.gif)

File: 1565094357265-1.jpg (46.22 KB, 685x679, srep15689-f4.jpg)


The previous grand solar cycle would have the high end of the output at about the years 1400-1600. Do we have anything like the Ghost Rockets and Flying Discs in that time frame? Yes, actually we do…

>>65815 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1561_celestial_phenomenon_over_Nuremberg and
>>65817 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1566_celestial_phenomenon_over_Basel
Are these the previous solar grand cycles' Natural UFOs?

What metal would the sun toss into space if it could? (pic1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_nucleosynthesis
It's our old friends; Mg, Si, Fe. Mg being the easiest.

The rest of this hypothesis would be just showing how. The convection currents for the sun are rotating ions, rotating charge makes magnetic fields, magnetic fields lead to natural rail guns. And here I was laughing at your "Red Spot of Jupiter Natural Rail Gun (RSJNRG)" and now I am proposing the "Solar Natural Rail Gun (SNRG)™".

Understanding the process is better done with visuals:

and >>104636 pics.

The sun has horizontal magnetic field lines that orbit within the sun. I assume sun spots are like our atmospheric weather cells, it is caused by the circumference length difference at different latitudes. This causes non-equatorial flow to move slower than the equator. This speed difference causes eddies. The sun gets magnetic eddies -> sun spots. And we get wind eddies -> low pressure systems -> cyclones, hurricanes.

The science paper updates the old model of the sun by replacing the 1 layer of convection (as shown in the visuals above) with 2 convection layers (pic2). Both of these layers migrate north and south but not in unison (they are different sizes for example). They are out of phase. When they are close to each other -> major sunspots and presumably major gouging into the solar core. This digs up metal and ultimately throws it into space. Since a sun spot can be larger than the Earth the amount of metal thrown is staggering to contemplate >>101892 size of Earth bottom left corner.

The Great Sun Spot of 1946 may have started the Ghost Rockets and Flying Saucers. The HMR may even be the sun splashing Mercury with Mg. And the solar spin up of the previous grand cycle gave us 1560's celestial phenomena. Space collision leading to metal objects probably does happen but it is nothing compared to the sun throwing metal.

7b706 No.107596

File: 1565119964608-0.png (54.45 KB, 1567x394, UFOCAT 1300s-1880s.png)

File: 1565119964608-1.png (62.81 KB, 1567x394, UFOCAT 1300s-1690s.png)

File: 1565119964608-2.png (183.2 KB, 894x894, starlight-shrug.png)

UFOCAT sightings from 1300s to 1880s. Range is chosen to try and catch the last solar grand cycle and the current one >>107577 reports of what modern UFO researchers have back-classified as UFOs began to ramp up at about the same time as the sun ramped up. (pic1)

Reducing the chart to 1300s-1600s to show only the last grand cycle shows an out-of-place spike in 1640s when the sun should be at minimum. (pic2) Examining 1640s:

>"Year of the birth of Our Lord Jesus Christ 1641, May 9th, in this city of Braga, in the lodgings of Reverend Doctor Jao d'Abreda Rocha, ecclesiastic judge and general vicar of this court, the archbishop of Braga: there the Reverend Judge was alerted by D. Gastao Coutinho, general of the province of Entre Douro e Minho, of the fact that many people going towards the area of Porto acting upon a warning given in this city that the enemies were approaching in that area, saw some signs on the moon, in which there appeared a Wafer and two human figures that looked like Angels; and that the said judge know the truth of it: about which the Reverend Doctor ordered this writ to be made, that I sign; and he asked the following witnesses. Father Simao Alvares, apostolic notary, wrote it.

>4 May 1641, Madrid, Spain: Unexplained black cloud

>At 9:00 P.M., "the sky being very calm, without there being a single cloud in it, (Jose Pellicer reported) an extremely black and dark cloud, that approached from somewhere between the east and the north, dilated and narrow, crossing between the west and Midday, that was stationary for some time" .. The people there heard "loud noises, bugles, drums, as if an invisible ferocious battle were happening but without anything to be seen."

>14 September 1641, Akhaltsike, Georgia

>"the ether on the eastern side was torn up and a big dark-blue light began to descend. Being wide and long, it came down approaching the Earth and it illuminated everything around, more brightly than the sun." The forward part of the light "revolved like a wheel, moving to the north, calmly and slowly emitting red and white light, and in front of the light, at a distance of an open hand, there was a star the size of Venus. The light was still visible until my father had sung, weeping, six sharakans, after which it moved away. Later we heard that people saw this miraculous light up to Akhaltsike."

>3 July 1642, Olesa de Montserrat, Catalonia, Spain

>Joseph Aguilera and others saw a globe changing to "three moons," later an enormous light seen for one hour.

>18 January 1644, Boston, Mass.

>Three men coming to Boston saw two "man-shaped lights" come out of the sea. About 8 P.M. several inhabitants of an area of Boston located near the sea saw a light the size of the full moon rise in the northeast. Shortly thereafter, another light appeared in the east. The witnesses observed a curious game of hide-and-seek between the two objects. During this celestial ballet, several persons known to be sober and pious, who were aboard a boat between Dorchester and Boston, claimed they heard a voice in the sky uttering the following words in a most terrible voice: "Boy, boy, come away…" These calls were repeated about 20 times, coming from various directions.

>25 January 1644, Boston, Massachusetts

>Luminous objects were seen sparkling, emitting flames. Again, the aerial ballet of the previous week was observed and a voice calling out: "Boy, boy, come away."

>April 1645, Caudan, Brittany, France

>A Procession of sky beings A sixty-year old man named Jean Coachon, who lived in Calan, near Lanvodan and Vannes, stated that he had witnessed a procession of sky beings he called "angels," circling above the church, with the Virgin among them. This was related by the Lord of Lestour, who collected such stories.

>11 November 1645, Location unknown

>A body large enough to be a satellite was seen near Venus from Naples by the astronomer Francesco Fontana. He made further observations of the "satellite" on December 25th 1645 and January 22nd, 1646. Jean-Charles Houzeau, director of the Royal Observatory of Brussels, baptized the satellite with the name "Neith" in the 1880s.

>May 1646, The Hague, Netherlands

>Unknown people and animals were seen in the sky of The Hague. A fleet of airships came from the southeast, carrying many occupants. It came close to the aerial spectacle. A huge fight ensued. When the phenomenon vanished, people saw "something like a huge cloud that appeared at a place where nothing was visible before."

>21 May 1646, Newmarket & Thetford, England

>"Betwixt Newmarket and Thetford in the foresaid county of Suffolk, there was observed a pillar or a Cloud to ascend from the earth, with the bright hilts of a sword towards the bottom of it, which piller (sic) did ascend in a pyramidal form, and fashioned it self into the forme of a spire or broach Steeple, and there descended also out of the skye, the forme of a Pike or Lance, with a very sharp head or point (…) This continued for an hour and a half.

-- Wonders in the Sky by Vallee.

And the finding of the investigations of 1640s UFOs is (pic3). Some might be actual human airships, some are hallucinations (or angels exist), some are natural astronomical phenomena. All of them are odd :)

48ce2 No.108057

why do the jews keep the big tiddied space gf's secret?

7b706 No.108102

You'd share yours around?

7b706 No.108686

Some additional thoughts, the extended solar Maunder minimum (~100 years according to charts >>107577 ), means the core super-heats (no convection) -> higher fission rates -> 1946 convection rates was larger than previous grand cycle -> perfect storm of throwing metal.

7b706 No.109013

File: 1565652290162-0.jpg (518.4 KB, 1920x1020, Mercury Topography HMR Sou….jpg)

File: 1565652290162-1.jpg (472.81 KB, 1920x1017, Mercury Topography HMR Mid….jpg)

File: 1565652290162-2.jpg (485.06 KB, 1921x1019, Mercury Topography HMR Nor….jpg)

I've been wondering about how similar the HMR valley and its 180° opposite valley are. I've done a topography of the North, Mid and South of the HMR valley and its opposite partner. The Mid and South seem to be similar and consistent with the slow erosion caused by Taurid (and friends) meteorite erosion (as they swing into the sun and Mercury swings out into them).

However the North HMR valley shows a strong difference. It is pockmarked by a swarm of craters that are deep. If I assume black looking craters are likely to be newer (black means deep, not filled in by meteor dust over centuries) then the missing HMR single crater is actually viewable multiple craters overlaid on a pre-existing valley.

This implies a swarm of Mg rich material hit Mercury. Two sources could be Asteroid Belt collion/break up or sun flung metal swarm. Because the HMR extends toward the equator but with less density of Mg and widely despersed, perhaps the centrifugal rotation of Mercury has spread the molten light Mg south. A look at the topography did not suggest the equator was downhill.

7b706 No.109408

File: 1565750709601.jpg (92.69 KB, 855x681, 1908Apj....28...79E--Mg th….jpg)

>… drawings show a moderately bright mass of prominences, extending from position-angle 89° to 121°, having bright condensations at 91° and 97°. The sodium and magnesium lines were noted as bright at 91°. The main mass was estimated at 50” in height at 8:50, and 85” an hour later. A smaller but bright prominence was situated at P.A. 135°, and this also increased during the observation from 45” to 80”.

[And over 7 hours it accelerated from 1 km/s to 84km/s (302,400 km/h). SNRG™ confirmed.]

7b706 No.109498

File: 1565822026223.jpg (104.28 KB, 898x699, corona.jpg)

Pretty sun is pretty.

7b706 No.109503

File: 1565823298292.jpg (98.14 KB, 800x960, d.jpg)

Why accelerate after leaving the sun?

Solar Coronal Acceleration

>Close to the solar surface, the Sun’s gravity is strong enough to retain all these energetic particles. However, the force of gravity decreases with distance from the solar surface. Beyond a particular distance, the gravity will no longer be strong enough to contain the hot plasma. The plasma will start escaping from the Sun at this point. This steady leak of the corona continues at greater and greater speeds, until the stream of particles develops into a wind, which blows at supersonic speeds.

>The solar physicist Eugene Parker predicted the existence of the wind and estimated that it would reach the Earth with a speed of a few hundred kilometers per second. At that time, it was a rather bold prediction and his scientific paper on this prediction was rejected by referees. The then editor of The Astrophysical Journal, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, overruled the referees and published the paper. Later on, with the advent of the Space Age, instruments aboard satellites indeed detected this wind. This was a real triumph for theoretical solar physics. Years later, it was noticed that the solar wind was very “gusty,” containing very-high-speed streams mixed with slower winds. These high-speed streams rotate with the Sun like a searchlight beam, and caress the Earth every 27 days. They seem to originate from large regions of single magnetic polarity on the Sun. These regions are different from sunspot fields, which are bipolar and compact. The unipolar magnetic regions also appeared as very dark regions in the x-ray pictures, and gained the name “coronal holes.” But the physical explanation for the acceleration of the solar wind to speeds much beyond the value predicted by Parker still eludes the scientists.

-- Daystar : a peep into the workings of the Sun by Venkatakrishnan, P. (2018)

7b706 No.109516

7b706 No.110186

File: 1566100370570.png (220.94 KB, 984x710, Fraunhofer lines.png)

"Cold" metal in the sun in 1814+ absorbing light.

(pic1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer%20lines
Magnesium line is called 'b'

Hot metal in the sun in 1890+ emitting light

>When some of the very best negatives of the solar spectrum are carefully examined, it is found that some of the sharp-edged, clean-cut, and unshaded lines of iron, chromium, manganese, titanium, etc., have a faint, dark shading just outside the edge of the lines. It is very faint and difficult to observe (only slightly darker than the general background of the solar spectrum), but is not due to contrast, as it is not always present. It is a difficult observation to make, but was observed for some time before the explanation forced itself upon me. The correct explanation undoubtedly is that this faint, dark shading (dark in the negative) is the remains of an emission line, either produced at the photosphere or lower down in the solar atmosphere than the absorption line.

>This emission line is rather broader than the absorption line (perhaps nearly two or three times as broad), and, consequently, is produced lower down in the solar atmosphere, where the pressure is much greater than in the strata giving us the absorption line.

>Examining the figures again we notice that there are traces of an emission line which must be produced at a higher altitude, as we see only the faint edges of this line (most of it being obliterated by the absorption of the central line)

>The central absorption line is rather strong in both cases, but not so strong as in the shaded lines of iron, magnesium, and aluminium.


It isn't clear if the hot metal detected is from better human detection or the sun is actually heating more metal into incandescence. But the timing works well for the solar grand cycle and Mystery Airships.

7b706 No.110192

File: 1566103650489.jpg (310.54 KB, 752x978, 1895 hot calcium in solar ….jpg)

1893 No metallic prominences in the solar chromosphere (above the photosphere).
1895 H and K (Calcium metal) Fraunhofer lines seen in the metallic prominences in the chromosphere.
Warming up for Mystery Airships?

ac095 No.110763

Currently testing potential colleagues for verifications and connections. New blood inhabiting physics stations. YOUNG new blood not impressed by jew schooled cucks & politically correct appointees. Can't speak.

Colored rains not isolated to India. New colleagues found multiples in Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Serbia, northwestern China, Japan, Norway, Sweden, average timetables of 4-22 years on average per region. Prepare thine posterior Herr Vril: discovered colored rains in Australia, then whole of South America; Argentina, Chile, Brazil. South Pacific islands? Hundreds of records.

No silicon lead to new working-on-it theory = metallic solar ejections. Don't even know what I'm looking for now. Fun maybe/perhaps. Rightfully accused you of same: must follow facts without trust.

7b706 No.110885

File: 1566445417908.png (1.01 MB, 1280x720, books.png)

I have 45 years of solar prominence data from 1903 to 1948 from an Indian observatory that was tasked by the government to learn more about the relationship between the sun and droughts. The data isn't digitised and needs to be if we want to analyse the relationship between metallic solar ejections, UFOs and other phenomena.

There are 81 documents, a sample of the quality is:
I have a list of all the documents. They are all on adsabs.

Relevant descriptions for metal bearing solar ejections are: bright (may or may not be metallic, metallic spectrum can also be hidden by clouds, mist, haze, etc if it was there), brilliant, metal(lic), b1 b2 or b4 (Fraunhofer Magnesium).

Regarding silicon, none of the documents mention silicon lines. This has me greatly puzzled. Silicon spectrum was known in 1906. Therefore it isn't part of the Fraunhofer lines (1814) but this shouldn't stop the recording of the frequencies for Si post 1906. I still need to work out what is happening here, it is contradictory. They mention Mg and Fe but between both in a sun should be Si and S. Does Si and S end up in the corona instead?

Possibilities include:
* Silicon lines were misinterpreted as other elements. Solution use https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html to re-evaluted the 81 papers/45 years of data.
* Silicon behaves differently, for example it might collect in the corona along with S.
* Scientists didn't develop the habit of looking for it.
* Si lines aren't very strong.

Regarding the origin of the metal I have 2 ideas.

1) It comes from the solar core and occurs more-so when the sun convection is low (core temp high), when the convection ramps up it gouges the core. This idea has a major flaw. The solar core is surrounded by the radiative zone, it is called that because it is so dense it can't convect. Therefore gouging the core seems unlikely, therefore theory 2).

2) The sun eats rock and shits metal, the rock atoms falls as a sediment over the top of the radiative zone. This happens especially when the convection is low (Maunder/Dalton Minimum). When the sun spins up the sediment is pulled back into circulation. The outward thrust of the convection currents is near the equator and metallic prominences are said to be near the equator. Still the missing silicon is a problem requiring an answer.

I propose we work together on converting these 81 documents to text. Then, because of the non-rigorous nature of the data, we chart the ratio of bright, metallic, b# prominences vs total prominences, rather than do a straight count. This sidesteps the following issues with the data:

* Scientists can only measure prominences beyond the solar edge (sun disk is too bright).
* They can't see prominences on the far side either.
* They are affected by terrestrial weather in small or total ways.
* The observations are not of the same length or at the same time of day.

I expect to see a rise and fall in the ratio of bright/metallic/b# prominences, there may be signs of a 10, 11 or 22 year cycle or solar grand cycle.

We can then back that up with the crude, less trustworthy, straight count. And even plot count per viewing time ratios.

Hints of a cyclic possibility are shown in http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1939ApJ....89..486B (second last page) where there is an increase in count and complexity of metals leading up to 1919 and then falls off again into the 1930s. (1913-1937 is also when the Taurids disappeared >>104116, less rock for the sun to eat?)

A simpler project, that would test the viability of the larger project, would be to count the b1,b2 (Mg) emission prominences per total prominences and see if any crude correlations show up. If that implies success we can push further in many directions, higher time resolution, wider selection of metals/elements (Ca reacts with water to make CaO and H2, disappearing ghost rockets in snow?).

7b706 No.110889

I just thought of a reason why the silicon could be missing, but Mg and Fe present. Fe is pulled up from the silt because it is magnetic. Mg is pulled up because it is light. Si is denser and not magnetic, it is harder to churn up.

Also notice to the two deep "gouges" in >>107577 pic 2, lower graph, post 1900. Is that the cause?

7b706 No.110905

File: 1566481256362-0.png (15.5 KB, 655x454, solar metallic prominences….png)

File: 1566481256362-1.png (348.84 KB, 1368x751, 1949KodOB...5..189D-metal.png)

First pass at analysing the solar prominence data (pic). This is a raw count of metallic prominences on the limb of the sun for a 6 month period. It doesn't yet compare the raw count to all prominences seen or to the amount of viewing time, so it may not be an apples to apples comparison. It does suggest a 10 year cycle. UFOs also show a 10 year cycle. It might be an 11 year cycle, which is what the sun is said to have.

I want to add another hypothesis to why the metal is there aside from 1) and 2) at >>110885 :

3) Meteors might be orbiting such that they graze the sun every 10-11 years turning them from rock to metal. No need to enter the sun.

This brings up a problem and a unsatisfactory solution. Orbits longer than 4 years (and in the plane of the ecliptic) will eventually run into Jupiter who will eat them or throw them away. However an orbit that is around 11.862 years (Jupiter's orbital period) that never ran into Jupiter's gravity would also never run into it in the future. But the chart doesn't support a nearly 12 year cycle. It matches a 10 year cycle.

UFOs = 10 year cycle. >>101941 (pic3)
Metallic prominences = 10 year cycle.
Sun spots = 11 year cycle.
Jupiter = nearly 12 year cycle.

The sun might have a 10 year metal throwing cycle. The metal likely comes from rocks it has eaten rather than the core. Perhaps the lower convection current has a 10 year cycle and the upper has an 11 year cycle. >>107578 (pic2) The upper makes sunspots, the lower scoops up Mg and Fe and passes it to the upper for expulsion at the equator.

There seems to be a hint of higher counts in one half of the year over the other half. This might be Earth seasonal weather effects. A by-month break down would show this.

Metallic prominence data from 1903 to 1911 was not nicely tabulated by the scientists and will need to be derived through a more laborious process. A crude look at the 1903-1911 data by searching for "metal" or "bri" (bright or brilliant) shows:

1903-1904 : 89 #############################################
1905.01-06: 79 ########################################
1905.07-12: 63 ################################
1906.01-06: 71 ####################################
1906.07-12: 35 ##################
1907.01-06: 72 ####################################
1907.07-12: 49 #########################
1908.01-06: 91 ##############################################
1908.07-12: missing data, to be located later.
1909.01-06: 38 ###################
1909.07-12: 34 #################
1910.01-06: 44 ######################
1910.07-12: 20 ##########
1911.01-06: 21 ###########
1911.07-12: 18 #########

This hints at a peak going back to mystery airships, perhaps.

The data for 1946 first metallic prominence (pic2) correlates with the Jan 29 Great Sunspot ( >>101892 pic2 ). It also seems to reappear 29 days later in the same latitude (pic2). The sun rotates about every 28 days. This might mean the Great Sunspot of 1946 spewed metal for 30 days. The metallic prominence was at latitude 29-34N (pic2), the GS was at centred at 26N. The co-ordinates and timing are very close. This would be a good candidate for splashing Mercury with Mg. The 30 day limit explains no Mg on the opposite of the Mercury HMR (88 day orbit > 30 days of sun Mg splashing).

Everything looks good for a 10 year metal throwing cycle, so far.

7b706 No.111011

File: 1566530483222-0.png (99.81 KB, 1043x774, Great Sunspots table.png)

File: 1566530483222-1.jpg (107.46 KB, 1026x710, sunspot14851recurrentdata.jpg)

File: 1566530483222-2.jpg (244.08 KB, 781x945, sunspotrogrecurrent1439.jpg)

File: 1566530483222-3.jpg (282.75 KB, 791x938, sunspotrogrecurrent1439b.jpg)

File: 1566530483222-4.jpg (232.02 KB, 792x938, sunspotrogrecurrent1439c.jpg)

Challenging the sun throwing metal hypothesis to see if it stands up

We can test the "Great Sunspot of January 29, 1946 (size 5202MvH) = Ghost Rockets" by looking at the even larger "Great Sunspot of March 30, 1947 (size 6132MvH) = Flying Disks" (pic1).

Looking at http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/1950KodOB...5..225D we see that no metallic prominces are mentioned for March 30 (page3). How embarrassing! Being confused I looked over the rest of the paper for large events at the latitude -24:47 (pic) ie. 24°S. I noticed that under the section Solar Flares (page8) there is a list of solar flares at 21-23°S. The dates range from Feb 7 to Apr 10. This got me wondering about the lifespan of this GS.

Heading over to the Greenwich Solar Observatory (pics) data I learn that this GS is numbered 14886 (pic2) and it is a member of the "recurrent sunspots" numbered 1439. What this means is the GS rotated around the sun multiple times. It was born around Feb 5 and died about May 11. Looking back at the solar flares at that latitude they start at Feb 7 and end Apr 10. The flares fit within the GS lifespan. Then I went back and looked at the Metallic Prominences list for that time frame. There are two metallic prominences at 25°S (Apr 6) and 27°S (Apr 30), 7 days and 31 days after the GS max.

But the metal throwing fun does not end there. Do solar flares throw metal? Books and Wikipedia focus on solar flares as being sub-atomic particles, electrons and beta particles and destroying artificial satellites, but https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1950ApJ...111..572R/abstract and others informs us that solar flares are a laundry list of elements including Mg and Fe.

Therefore the GS of March 30, 1947 was throwing metal; (born Feb 5), Feb 7, Feb 13, Feb 17, Mar 7, Mar 12, Mar 14, Mar 15, Apr 6, Apr 9, Apr 10 & Apr 30, (dead May 11). And that's only the ones we caught.

"GS1946Jan" threw metal for about 30 days (1 solar rotation), "GS1947Mar" threw metal for about 112 days (4 solar rotations).

Some caveats, the longitude of the GS1947Mar solar flares is variable and not often associated directly with the GS location. This can be explained by the fact that sun spots and metal throwing aren't directly related, they are both off-shots of longitudinal (horizontal) magnetic field lines being twisted by high convection speeds. You can have one without the other, or both in different places on the same latitude. The other caveat is we don't have direct evidence that the 112 days of solar flares actually had metal in them, but it is expected because solar flares are mega prominences. Large prominences come from large convection, large convection scoops up metal silt. And 1950 spectrograph of solar flares showed metals and more.

I am rather surprised that the sun does extended multi-day metal throwing.

Solar flares and sunspots: https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/solar-activity/en/

7b706 No.111542

File: 1566720048823-0.jpg (44.39 KB, 900x480, sunspot14417recurrentdata.jpg)

File: 1566720048823-1.jpg (258.6 KB, 803x958, sunspotrogrecurrent1390.jpg)

File: 1566720048823-2.jpg (227.36 KB, 787x947, sunspotrogrecurrent1390b.jpg)

File: 1566720048824-3.jpg (1.46 MB, 1960x1080, 13.jpg)

>"GS1946Jan" threw metal for about 30 days (1 solar rotation)

This seemed suspiciously too close to 1 rotation so I relooked at it from the Royal Observatory, Greenwich data (pics). The recurrent sunspot #1390 existed from 29-01-1946 and died 08-05-1946. I realised then I was not thinking large enough. Another large spot recurrent #1406 existed from 19-07-1947* until 30-08-1946 and reached 4720 MvH in size. Stepping back even further the larger spots of greater than 3000 MvH started in 1892, max'ed in 1947 and fell below 3000 MvH in 1990 http://www.cv-helios.net/RGO-NOAA-USAF.pdf matching UFOs >>70176 pic.

* Ghost Rockets:
>The best known of these crashes occurred on July 19, 1946, into Lake Kölmjärv, Sweden. Witnesses reported a gray, rocket-shaped object with wings crashing in the lake. One witness interviewed heard a thunderclap, possibly the object exploding. However, a 3-week military search conducted in intense secrecy again turned up nothing.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_rockets

So the UFO situation can be explained with:

1) The sun throws metal >>109408 >>110905 , especially Mg that burns bright white, and Fe, perhaps Ca and more. It ramps this up every 10 years especially between 1892 and 1990 as shown by max sun spot sizes. >>111011 pic1. UFOs have a 10 year cycle >>101941 pic3. Both involve very fast flying metal. When the sunspot max shrinks the classic Flying Discs go away. The 10 year cycle is unlikely to be permanent, as per the multi-century cycle of the sun >>107577 .

2) Man-made fake Hollywood "aliens" + MKULTRA + biological harvesting: http://constitution.org/abus/mkt/cannon_controllers.pdf and Afternon's information.

Are we done, AfterNon? Is there a mystery left regarding UFOs? Do we save the world now, from perpetual fantasies? Do they want to be saved, when it gets replaced with horror and being lied to by those trusted?

7b706 No.111543


7b706 No.111544

File: 1566726478485.jpg (215.25 KB, 734x900, 1947 09 15 Tampa Bay Times….jpg)

Public opinion on Flying Saucers in 1947.

>no aliens

>some kind of meteor or comet


7b706 No.111545

From the same blog….

>UFOs are spacecraft of advanced species from outer space (the cosmos)

>UFOs are projections of human psyches
>UFOs are advanced aircraft of an Earthian military
>UFOs are delusional hallucinations of mad people
>UFOs are errant computer mice or misbehaving pixels in a Matrix-like game
>UFOs are Frankensteinian quantum particles that have escaped the quantum world
>UFOs are a concretized mythos
>UFOs are visitors from time (past or future)
>UFOs are insertions from another dimension
>UFOs are the fictive creation of a few humorous jokers
>UFOs are unknown living species
>UFOs aren’t
>UFOs are ????


Should someone tell him?

7b706 No.111546

7b706 No.112270

File: 1566803420566.png (254.77 KB, 723x684, Reconstructing solar magne….png)

After looking at the metal throwing cycle >>110905 I decided to look at the sun's magnetic field through history. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.06492.pdf

I expect that the magnetic field strength is related to the solar convection speed(s). And I expect metal ions and Fe to be thrown the most when the mag. field is strong. The graph seems to bear this out. It also bring up the posibility of obtaing the raw data and comparing the very high mag field days with UFO sighting spikes. The low MF dates, years ending in 4, matches well with the metal prominence low points.

Interesting to see that post 1976 the cycle destabilised, this is the same time flying discs waned.

7b706 No.112352

File: 1566863367835.png (34.85 KB, 376x554, ADS-metallic-prominence-hi….png)

Digging around looking for a flaw in the sun hypothesis.
Science papers mentioning "metallic prominence". Nicely encompassing the Airship/Disc era.

5fae5 No.112354


7b706 No.112785

7b706 No.113011

Great Sunspots and Ghost Rockets and Flying Discs: >>111011

Great Sunspots and Mystery Airships (1896 Nov & 1897 Mar):

>"The most remarkable spot-group of the year was that of September 10-22 [1896]. It attained a maximum area of 2,000 millionths of the Sun’s visible hemisphere, but its chief characteristic was its unusual length, extending as it did over 24° of solar longitude, the various spots which made up the stream following each other, during the earlier days of its appearance, so closely as almost to form one continuous rift" -- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1897MNRAS..57..280./abstract

Large sunspot and 2 months later Mystery Airships.

An observation about the relationship between Sunspots and Metallic Prominences:

>1898: The recent large sun-spot has also afforded some interesting spectroscopic observations. The first indication of the disturbance was noted as early as August 20, when an extremely brilliant metallic prominence appeared at S. lat. 11° on the W. limb; and when the spot itself appeared 14 days later it was seen to be accompanied by brilliant jets of hydrogen in more or less violent motion. Metallic prominences were again seen close to the spot when the latter was on the W. limb on September 16, and on the E, limb on September 29. Among'the bright lines visible in the chromosphere over the spot region, the coronal line has been conspicuous at each: successive presentation. at the limb (August 20, September 3, 16, and 29). -- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1898JBAA....8..385./abstract

Metallic Prominences first, Sunspot second.

7b706 No.113025

File: 1567278399555.png (25.67 KB, 1350x760, Solar Metallic Prominces 1….png)

If you thought that was interesting:

A more rigorous version of >>112352 which charts the actual counts of seen metallic prominences on the suns edge.

It shows the small solar (or metal throwing) cycle and a cycle that might be 1890-1954 (with the pre-KodOB data being incomplete)

Did the sun run out of metal in 1950s (and the fade out into the 1970s was left over orbiting sun-metal) or did the naming conventions of scientists change in the 1960s?

7b706 No.113294

File: 1567333464120.png (25.29 KB, 856x576, Solar Metallic Prominces p….png)

The sun ran out of metal to throw in the 1950s. The remaining sightings are the result of man-made activity and sun-metal that managed to achieve an orbit and hit the Earth later.

>>112270 shows that the sun's mag field was winding up into the late 1940s early 1950s, but the metallic prominences never recovered past numbers >>113025 and pic.

7b706 No.113295

File: 1567335712509.jpg (44.08 KB, 926x341, srep15689-f3.jpg)

The metal was collected into the sun during the Little Ice Age.

7b706 No.113300


Did they convince you, anon?

a178e No.113301

File: 1567360525798.jpg (18.03 KB, 400x518, p56YoKCYj6aWqA.jpg)

Triple dubs. Can any anon argue against those?

7b706 No.113415

File: 1567410406545.jpg (89.85 KB, 915x881, 1.jpg)

>Nella precedente dispensa (maggio 1872) abbiamo dato il numero delle posizioni spettroscopiche giorno per giorno, nelle quali si vedevano invertite le righo del magnesio. Nel mese di giugno abbiamo continuato la stessa osservazione, e trovammo che il fenomeno andò anzi aumentando, per modo che questo metallo fu visibile più volte su tutto l’intiero bordo del sole. L’intensita luminosa delle righe invertite nel gruppo b fu sempre in accordo collo splendore delle fiamme della cromosfera.

-- https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1872MmSSI...1...65S/abstract

Google Translate:

>In the previous dispensation (May 1872) we gave the number of spectroscopic positions day by day, in which the magnesium lines were inverted. In June we continued the same observation, and found that the phenomenon was indeed increasing, so that this metal was visible several times over the entire edge of the sun. The luminous intensity of the inverted lines in group b was always in agreement with the splendor of the flames of the chromosphere.

>so that this metal was visible several times over the entire edge of the sun.

>so that this metal was visible several times over the entire edge of the sun.
>so that this metal was visible several times over the entire edge of the sun.

mfw the sun was full of hot churning Mg in 1872, during the grand cycle spin up. >>113295 Which goes well with it being accumulated in the Little Ice Age.

7b706 No.113423

File: 1567432555359-0.gif (452.45 KB, 500x281, rainbowdashomg.gif)

File: 1567432555359-1.jpg (921.71 KB, 4480x6088, 50 a day.jpg)

Metallic prominences:
1900s - 100-200 a year if you are lucky.
1873 - 20-50 a day! (7k - 18k a year!)

7b706 No.114065

File: 1567765467021.gif (75.59 KB, 741x1114, 1877MmSSI...6P..87.--magne….gif)

Mg and Fe solar erruption, 1877

7b706 No.114081

File: 1567801469874-0.png (701.34 KB, 1852x682, srep15689-f3--with solar c….png)

File: 1567801469874-1.png (95.92 KB, 834x653, Wikipedia Solar Cycle.png)

I've shown the sun can eject metal. Now the timing of when the sun is most agitated corresponds well with UFO waves. During the UFO era UFOs were on a 10 year cycle, so was the sun. More work to do but it is going well.

91977 No.114546

Ayy lmao's come from inside the Earth, Change My Mind.

7b706 No.114548

File: 1568130335909.png (1.02 MB, 1864x1102, human-alien.png)

>In 1943…

>According to Palmer (in his autobiography The Secret World), Palmer wrote back to Shaver, asking how he had learned of Mantong. Shaver responded with an approximately 10,000-word document entitled "A Warning to Future Man". Shaver wrote of extremely advanced prehistoric races who had built cavern cities inside the Earth before abandoning Earth for another planet due to damaging radiation from the Sun. Those ancients also abandoned some of their own offspring here, a minority of whom remained noble and human "Teros", while most degenerated over time into a population of mentally impaired sadists known as "Deros"—short for "detrimental robots". Shaver's "robots" were not mechanical constructs, but were robot-like due to their savage behavior.

>These Deros still lived in the cave cities, according to Shaver, kidnapping surface-dwelling people by the thousands for meat or torture. With the sophisticated "ray" machinery that the great ancient races had left behind, they spied on people and projected tormenting thoughts and voices into our minds (reminiscent of schizophrenia's "influencing machines" such as the Air loom). Deros could be blamed for nearly all misfortunes, from minor "accidental" injuries or illnesses to airplane crashes and catastrophic natural disasters. Women especially were singled out for brutal treatment, including rape, and Mike Dash notes that "sado-masochism was one of the prominent themes of Shaver's writings".[5] Though generally confined to their caves, Shaver claimed that the Deros sometimes traveled with spaceships or rockets, and had dealings with equally evil extraterrestrial beings. Shaver claimed to possess first-hand knowledge of the Deros and their caves, insisting he had been their prisoner for several years.


7b706 No.114798

File: 1568492916729.png (69.28 KB, 885x325, Carbon14_with_activity_lab….png)

Celestial phenomena 1561 and 1566 >>65815 >>65817 >>65819 now have an explanation. The sun had a grand minimum (pic1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sp%C3%B6rer_Minimum between 1460 until 1550. 11 and 15 years later the accumulated space rock-metal was ejected by the sun. The phenomena would have streamed towards the Earth from the sun.

The metal would have oxidised in the Earth air. e.g. Mg to MgO2 white powder, Ca to CaO white powder etc. The sun had about a century of accumulated rock-metal to eject.

We should see similar phenomena around Solar Cycle 35+ >>114081 pic1. Around 2100, which means you'll be dead and miss it.

7b706 No.114799

.. also Iron, red hot and black.

7b706 No.114984

>U.S. Navy Confirms That it Can’t Identify Objects in Controversial UAP Videos

[View All] (515 posts and 491 image replies omitted)
[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / cyb / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]