[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / cyb / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]

/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
:
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1502146623040-0.png (261.23 KB, 405x818, An Explosive Meteorite.png)

File: 1502146623040-1.png (92.85 KB, 200x266, 1871ufo.png)

File: 1502146623040-2.jpg (22.84 KB, 409x599, the_great_comet_of_1881.jpg)

File: 1502146623040-3.jpg (56.75 KB, 500x356, sanfranciscocall17nov1896-….jpg)

File: 1502146623040-4.jpg (63.55 KB, 512x483, 1897mystery-airship.jpg)

7b706 No.750[View All]

This post is inspired by >>>/mlpol/59382.

I have been researching UFOs and aliens for decades. I have found the best way to understand the phenomena is to time-line it and then see what else was happening around the same time. Time-lining it allows the evolution & origin of certain aspects to show up which means you can trace things back to origin points.

I don't concern myself with if each UFO/alien report is real or not real, but I look at it in a wide ranging meta-view and this shows a sensible evolution which implies it is real and therefore the reports are generally mostly real.

I am not sure what the best way is to do this data dump. I have decided to do a succinct 300 year history which can be expanded on by me asking questions. This allows me to keep my efforts in proportion to actual board interest levels.

This initial section is to show the development of human sky technology and also shows that nothing ET UFO like is happening yet.

1758 - Book: Concerning Earths in the Solar System, in which Emanuel Swedenborg detailed his alleged journeys (spiritual) to the inhabited planets (up to Saturn + 5 exo-planets), solar system barrier, suns are black.
1783 - France: Manned balloons
1803 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utsuro-bune
1850 - and onwards triangular shapes are reported in the sky but when researched most of these can be associated with comets and comet fragments (comets tend to break up near Earth, Sun and Jupiter into sharp angular fragments).
1851 - Dr. William Bland sent design: steam engine driving twin propellers suspended under airship to Great Exhibition, London
1852 - Comet fragment dramatically crashes to Earth with sheets of rain (comet water) and dark ominous clouds with read streaks before the massive chunk crashes into the English channel. The other interesting part about this is that it happens near dawn, and the dawn side of the Earth is in the direction of the Earth's travel around the sun. So the Earth overran this comet fragment and sucked it down into it. This dramatically shows how astronomical phenomena can produce UFO reports. Pic #1 Attached.
1863 - “Aereon” by Solomon Andrews (inventor) flew, unpowered, controllable dirigible,Perth Amboy, New Jersey.
1871 - Mystery airship, Mt. Washington, New Hampshire (Solomon Andrews?) See Pic #2. This is one of the earliest UFO reports and we can see it is consistent with an airship. We have no reason to conclude it is ET yet.
1871 - (Vril, the Power of) The Comming Race fiction novel by Edward Bulwer-Lytton. This book in Germany inspires the use of the term Vril for unknown magical/physical forces and leads to the nick name The Vril Society.
1881 - a comet was mistaken as an unusual object in the sky. See pic #3.
1886 - Book: A Dweller on Two Planets, Atlantis, life on Venus, advanced technology, karma, Mt. Shasta. “No telescope will ever reveal human life on Venus; not that it is not there, but its forms are of the One Substance effected by a range of force rendering them imperceptible to earthly eyes." – what we see here is the myth of sentient life on other planets in our solar system starting to form. There is no reason to reject this notion at that time.
1886 - cheap way to manufacture aluminium is discovered. At this point airships are flying around, some are secret projects. They use bamboo and cloth and ropes. Cheap aluminium allows them to be made of this metal. France is becoming a leader in airship design. You can think of these airships as the B2 bomber of the day, these are very serious military tech for spying and air to ground attack. Therefore there is secrecy around designs as well.
1891 - Contactee Thomas Blott (William Simpson, 1828-1910) The Man from Mars is a book about a Martian explaining how Mars is great and Earth sux, basically. It is not clear if this was supposed to be fiction or a reported event.
1893 - In the article “Man of the Year Million”, H. G. Wells envisaged humanity transformed into a race of grey-skinned beings, stunted and with big heads. – the greys!!

So with that look so far we can see many of the elements of aliens and UFOs exist but there are no reports yet of flying saucers or any meaningful reports of flying triangles under intelligent control. All of it, when it comes to ETs, is human imagination. We can reasonably say no ETs are showing up in this 1700s-1800s time period.

In 1893 science starts to speculate about gravity and if we can understand it better and control it.

1893 - Oliver Heaviside makes paper called A GRAVITATIONAL AND ELECTROMAGNETIC ANALOGY http://sergf.ru/Heavisid.htm – this will be very important as we continue the time lining.
1894 “Aug 26, British admiral reported sighting a large disk with a projection like a tail” – Keyhoe (1950) – Airship? Science experiment? There are no good references for this report and so it can't be examined further.
1896 - Germany 11 Sep, Zagreb daily newspaper Obzor “The day before yesterday we received a telegram sent by an amateur journalist. He informed us that David Schwarz from Zagreb has invented an [aluminium] airship which he hopes he could direct on his own free will."
1896 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystery_airship – this is the UFO flap of 1896-97 but they were airships, not disks, triangles or spacecraft. We know that airships won't work in space so these are human-made. This shows that human advanced tech can be a unsolved mystery. See pics #4 and #5

(cont.)
441 posts and 412 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

7b706 No.102696

File: 1561238576677-0.jpg (302.18 KB, 784x936, 1965-09-03a.jpg)

File: 1561238576677-1.jpg (228.88 KB, 518x948, 1965-09-03b.jpg)

I'm examining the 1965 Flying Disc wave as an assumed "echo" of the 1947 wave as a result of the 1946 Mercury collision. What is emerging is that these magnesium objects are thermite reactions waiting to happen. In space it seems they can be dormant, but when in the atmosphere the atomised magnesium in the core can violently react with oxygen or nitrogen. It can also react with the silica and silicon of the object. Temperatures can reach 3100C. There are thermal, magnetic, EM/light, erratic motion and buoyancy effects. These things are dangerous.

The Taurid Meteor showers as we known them today did not exist prior to 1946. There was a brief shower in 1937 (Ghost Fliers?) and an absence for decades before that. Meteors and these objects have the same source.

7b706 No.102933

File: 1561441614793-0.png (325.07 KB, 2704x1160, Mercury synodic period vs ….png)

File: 1561441614793-1.gif (382.88 KB, 470x471, happy-horse-noises.gif)

AFTERNON!

I can explain the UFO waves 1947-1979. The debris launched by the Mercury collision has to obey the laws of orbital mechanics. It will return eventually to its place of origin after orbiting the sun. Mercury will also eventually return to that place at the same time. It's just a matter of clockwork mechanics and time. In addition Earth will also be placed as it was the first time at some point.

If I calculate the closeness of both Mercury and Earth to the original locations for each I can predict "echo" repeat collision probabilities. This assumes there is debris still available for colliding against Mercury again (each collision, planet pass, Earth strafe depletes the pool of debris).

Attached is a pic of the predictions (70%+) vs the UFO Waves in UFOCAT. All waves explained except the moderate 1950 and 1957 waves.

No need for human/ET explanations between 1958-1980s for waves of UFOs.

Given that the Ghost Fliers occurred in 1934/7 there may have been a precursor event (close flyby, no impact) which echoes into 1950/7?

Happy, happy, joy, joy!

7b706 No.103243

File: 1561638494911-0.jpg (43.96 KB, 400x504, mercury_magnesium_splatter….jpg)

File: 1561638494911-1.gif (1.57 MB, 1114x1024, Animate.gif)

Fun with animated gifs

B&W is https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/map/Mercury/Topography/MESSENGER/Mercury_Messenger_USGS_DEM_Global_665m_v2 showing Mercury topology. Bright means high ground, black is deep depression. Red is high magnesium.

The depression matches the magnesium area quite well. I suggest this is where magnesium rich asteroid(s) smash into Mercury.

ac095 No.103497

>>101892
Few of these events are extraordinary, impacts occur >500 times per day on each planet.
>>103243
Many blanks now filled in, thank you. Examination of terrestrial craters matches same forms of topography. Not a fun topic to learn/understand. Many 'unknowns' relisted to simple impacts.

>>101894
Formal request to never use that term again: initiated. Dialogue status: sincere.

Still searching for original sources on sonic devices from 90-140 years ago. Progress slow, many videos & other internet resources now deleted. Gee, I wonder who's behind that.

The multiple exposes on German use of "methamphetamines" was wrong: non-synthetic plant-derived amphetamines were used. Few side effects, minimal addiction risks, slight fat loss improvements. More bullshit propaganda to discard.

>>101941
>>101942
Somewhat proves piezoelectric materials were in use decades before either you or I figured. Want incendiary ammunition? Carnegie Steel Company. Mass backdoor funding from Jew-S government for military projects. Had over 30 secret divisions within company. Later results: three in particular. Codenames: Project HARDCOUNT, Project SPACE RACE, Project THUNDER ENGINE. Will explain first two soon, last one related to you-know-who.

23-24? Hm. Notable ones:
1920: radio transmission, supposedly by Ernst Alexanderson, another Jew-S Patent Office muppet. In 1923 "he" supposedly created high frequency neon lamps then in 1924 the scanning disc.
1921: lie detector, John Larson.
1922: audiometer, Harvey Fletcher.
1922: the Neutrodyne,
1923: instant film camera, Samuel Shlafrock.
1924: earth inductor compass, Morris Titterington.
1924: the Moviola, Iwan Serrurier.
1924: radio-based altimeter, Lloyd Espenschied.

A short list of certain prior/later inventions that will interest you:
1891: Dow process for mass production of bromines.
1893: Spectroheliograph, either George Ellery Hale or Henri Alexandre Deslandres in 1894.
1894: Stadimeter, Bradley Allen Fiske.
1895: Cyclocomputer, Curtis Hussey Vedeer.
1897: the muffler, Milton Reeves.
1898: wireless remote controller, Tesla.
1899: wing warping, Henry Farman, French.
1900: stolen blueprints for nickel-zinc battery, that coattail riding kikelet.
1901: radio-direction finder, John Stone Stone. Much more important than those frauds Edison or Einstein, he inspired Tesla's own inventions.
1902: the electric hearing aid.
1902: mercury arc valve, Peter Cooper Hewitt.
1903: "Wood's Glass", Robert William Woods. Infrared-radiation communication system. Oh gee, I wonder why.
1904: pantograph, John Q. Brown.
1906: audion tube, Lee De Forest.
1907: electrostatic precipitator, Frederick G. Cottwell. One problem: this was in use by French & German aviators for years before Cottwell acquired blueprints, then had it patented.
1910: electric headset, Nathaniel Baldwin. Same problem as above.
1911: the electric engine starter, Charles F. Kettering. Same problem as above x2.
1912: aviation autopilot system, Lawrence Sperry. Same problem as above x3.
1912: the electric blanket, Sidney Russell. Same problem as above x4.
1914: the regenerative circuit, Edwin Armstrong.
1915: single sideband modulation, John Renshaw Carson.
1916: condenser microphone, Edward Christopher Wente.
1918: superheterodyne receiver, also by Edwin Armstrong.
1918: crystal oscillator, Alexander M. Nicholson. Blueprints stolen by Walter Guyton Cady.
1919: silica gel, Walter A. Patrick.
1926: liquid-fuel rocket, Robert Hutchings Goddard. Blueprints stolen from you know who and where.
1927: negative feedback amplifier, Harold Stephen Black. Most likely from stolen blueprints.

Now for the ones that will rock your world:
1929: the cyclotron, Ernest O. Lawrence.
1929: mass production of Freon, Charles Midgely & Charles Kettering.
1929: mass production of sunglasses, Sam Foster of Foster Grant Company. Required kit for all pilots.
1931: Aerogel, Samuel Stevens Kistler. This one invention solves thousands of bullshit reports & propaganda.
1932: radio telescope, Karl Guthe Jansky.
1933: multi-plane camera, Ub Iwerks.
1933: multiple frequency modulation systems, Edwin Armstrong again.

Technologies all across the world advanced too rapidly in certain sectors. The Befores were threatened, felt those should only be in military hands. Warned you of this yet I did NOT discover full meanings or implications until now. Combined technologies was not one mere answer, it is all of them.

ac095 No.103498

>>101942
Tromso, Norway 193 caught my attention. It's on all overflight zone maps for League of Nations aircraft. "Routine diplomatic satchels/dispatches". Good riddance & nice excuse. In 1936 the compact fluorescent bulb was finally sent to patent after multiple court battles between various inventors. Fun part? It had been experimented with for >8 years before then.

ac095 No.103499

Kitty continues to demand shitposting. Offer ignored.

>>103497
1922: the Neutrodyne, Louis Alan Hazeltine. Highly important for the era.

1935: factory production of fiberglass. Wasn't patented until 1938 by Russell Games Slayter while working for Owens-Corning.
1937: the first functional binary digital computer, supposedly by George Stibitz, another kike muppet skimming inventions from the Jew-S Patent Office. M-9 Gun Control Director? Definitely not his, stolen from captured German blueprints. He had a great number of shekel friends.
1937: photo-sensitive & radiation-sensitive glass, Daniel Stooky.
1937: polarized glass, Edwin Land.
1937: Klystron, Russell & Sigurd Varian.
1938: Nylon & Teflon, more Du Pont shekel-goblin business.
1939: the Vocoder. Given to Homer Dudley by judeo-bolshevik friend from Russia. Russians had been using it since 1921. At this year ANYONE'S voice could be picked out from a crowd of >10,000 and copied near perfectly. I should not have to tell you how sinister this one device is.
1940: the Fluxgate magnetometer, Victor Vacquier. At this time electromagnetic fields can be precisely mapped out.
1941: aromatic acrylic fibers. Like Aerogel, this solves even more bullshit reports.

ac095 No.103500

>>101943
>>102001
No selection bias. Historical & empirical data we find continues to prove otherwise.

>>102075
>>102076
Project HARDCOUNT began in 1909, Hollywood, Cuckifornia. Significant year, why? Procedural changes: 'black budgets', much goes off record, secret overseas archives, collaborations between pro-ziocuck nations seeking to double military spending at minimum. Intended to create a hard count of willing goyim between MIC interests & media shareholders. 13 banks & more involved. One word was chosen as doublethink for propaganda purposes across: "patriot". Yes, this is Pre-Operation Mockingbird. Greatly inspired that one later. History is a straight line still.

ac095 No.103506

“Any state, any entity, any ideology which fails to recognize the worth, the dignity, the rights of Man… that state is obsolete.”

The end.

7b706 No.103521

File: 1562002403460-0.png (376.34 KB, 800x705, 1951mnras.111...37a--tauri….png)

File: 1562002403460-1.png (257.18 KB, 800x664, 1951mnras.111...37a--tauri….png)

File: 1562002403460-2.jpg (160.77 KB, 1000x1000, 1952-1953_-to_1957aj.....6….jpg)

File: 1562002403460-3.png (380.44 KB, 851x838, Untitled2.png)

File: 1562002403460-4.png (443.81 KB, 702x868, Untitled.png)

>>103497
>Many blanks now filled in, thank you. Examination of terrestrial craters matches same forms of topography. Not a fun topic to learn/understand. Many 'unknowns' relisted to simple impacts.

Regarding impacts. High speed impacts create explosions, explosions are spherical, therefore no matter the angle of the descent the crater will always be round because the explosion makes the crater.

Regarding the High Magnesium Region on Mercury. Some odd interesting info: Mercury has 0.5 Mercury days in a Mercury year. Therefore 1 day on Mercury takes 2 Mercury years. The result of this is Mercury, at any particular point in its orbit is facing one particular way or the direct 180deg opposite way each orbit.

This means that the HMR faces the incoming asteroids one year and then the opposite side on the alternate years. The HMR is huge but the opposite area only has a crater with a much smaller splash of Magnesium. This suggests the Mg meteor collisions can't be often (or somehow ends up happening only on alternate Mercury alternate orbits - unlikely).

Or its the area that gets sideswipped. Asteroids and meteors when they head out near Jupiter can be sped up or slowed down by Jupiter. If they get slowed down they spiral closer and closer to the sun. If they have low inclination they can slowly spiral down towards the sun until they scrape Mercury. So this might be a low angle scrape past area. I need to do more work on this still. Perhaps spiralling outward works too.

I am looking at the 1946/7 Earth splatter events as having precursors going back to 1896. A soft disturbance of the 1946 impact object on prior down spiralling orbits leading up to the main event in 1946. Alternatively there are multiple down spiralling events, see pics.

Taurids, Perseids and Aquariid meteor showers have objects in them that are swinging by Mercury often. I am very puzzled that scientists aren't looking more at Mercury as the cause of some meteor showers rather than comet orbits which is clearly not working well ( https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/?meteor_streams ) so many gaps.

The reason is historical, early in history (1866!!) it was noticed that some meteor orbits matched comet orbits, therefore comets dust makes ALL meteors! *sigh* And that is where the belief system has remained ever since. I am very confused because the attached pics show Mercury orbit as a focal point in 1951 for many streams and objects!! Suppressed knowledge or am I uninformed on something?

I have correlated the regeneration of the Taurids in 1946 to the Ghost Rockets/Flying Discs. I am working on the Ghost Fliers. I have found reports of wobbling meteors in 1927 and 1931, 1946 has wobbling meteors too, which the scientists outright rejected and then forgot them because it did not fit preconceived notions.

I am currently building up a meteor shower history to try and get a handle on what is going on.

Pic4 is a meteor with only the iron hull, the presumed Mg/Si core chemically reacted away. Pic5 is the Leonid 1833 Meteor storm. Leonids did not exist before this.
[Falling Stars A Guide to Meteors and Meteorites by Michael D. Reynolds (2001)]

Lots of leads and a huge mess of space rocks and debris flying around to sort through.

7b706 No.103522

File: 1562002493993-0.png (1.97 MB, 4410x3000, actualhiresnlr.png)

>>103506
I'll answer the rest after some sleep.

c4828 No.103523

>>103522
I Have a question, that i don't thibk has been asked yet.

Whats the Deal with Cattle mutilations and ufos?

7b706 No.103530

File: 1562033326119-0.jpg (26.57 KB, 400x294, 1.jpg)

>>103523
>What's the Deal with Cattle mutilations and ufos?

Start here >>46338 and follow the replies. Short answer is either mad cow disease tracking and/or medical experiments.

7b706 No.103544

File: 1562041772496-0.pdf (105.17 KB, Mussolini's Roswell.pdf)

File: 1562041772496-1.png (511.4 KB, 900x583, luna astronomy.png)

>>103497
>Few of these events are extraordinary, impacts occur >500 times per day on each planet.
The value of these events is they are the camouflage of the air. The Hills were abducted from a craft that came out of the sky from the direction of the Moon, Jupiter and Saturn. The purpose is to have sloppy researchers blame the UFO sighting on celestial events. Magnify this cover by doing man made UFO abductions during meteor events. The sky actually has "cover" like the ground. Same for generating artificial clouds/mist. It blows my mind that the sky has tactical cover!!!

>Not a fun topic to learn/understand.

Why? Because of the "alien" staging afterwards which was successful?

>Formal request to never use that term again: initiated. Dialogue status: sincere.

Which term? Who requested?

>Somewhat proves piezoelectric materials were in use decades before either you or I figured.

Disagree. Waves have natural origins. Human efforts are secondary. However nature's waves inspire human efforts and fears. And at some point humans captured a natural UFO and used the tech derived from studying that natural UFO. This puts the 1931 non-flyable Italian landed UFO into context. See Attachment#1. The 2001 leak is the rewrite of it into an "alien" craft, similar to MJ-12 rewrites, while it might just be a natural object but hard to say because humans are actively developing also. See >>755 (1931)

(The fake alien new religion is still being pursued to control us and justify military tax spending in a presumed future united Earth.)

Prior to 1931, the interest is in T.T. Brown's massive voltage differential ionocraft/magneto-hydro-dynamics, (Brown is certain he has found actual artificial gravity). After 1931 you have the Germans working on flying disks…. and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pact_of_Steel (1930s) an exchange of knowledge about crashed UFOs from Italy to Germany??

Thanks for the timeline of tech. Most interesting:
>1931: Aerogel, Samuel Stevens Kistler. This one invention solves thousands of bullshit reports & propaganda.
>1935: factory production of fiberglass. Wasn't patented until 1938 by Russell Games Slayter while working for Owens-Corning.

1931 hmmm…


>>103498
Re: >>101942
>1934-01-23: Tuesday, January 23, 1934. Outside Tromso, Norway, a mystery plane shone a brilliant light on to a ship's deck, illuminating it like the day. The ship's captain could observe the pilot in the mystery plane (the pilot's cabin was brilliantly illuminated, a curious state of affairs for such a nocturnal exercise, but one which accords quite readily with modern UFO reports). The description of the pilot was, apparently, that of a normal man wearing a large hood and goggles.

>Tromso, Norway 193 caught my attention.



I'll add in here the pathways that I see that lead to the perception of pilots in UFOs.

Source 1:
Man-made craft and human pilots especially in the early days. Later this is converted into the alien look as you know… rubber and fur costumes, placement of space-opera props (paintings of galaxies, the Hills pull down "star map", etc), drugging the victim so they have "reality transformation" (Vallee/Hynek CE4) and other mind warping tech, hypnosis, techno-telepathy (microwave hearing, EM field sent through the brain -> measure the deviation in the field to get the brains electrical state = remote EEG.) etc.

Source 2:
Natural collisions in space making high temperature plasmas coated in metallic glass "protective" hulls. Strong EM fields interfere with aircraft, cars and human brains leading to brain malfunction and hallucinations. A weak field works because it is the field content not strength that matters. See >>89162 >>89585 also these EM fields can heal, the UV rays can disinfect see >>102696

We need to remain aware that both natural and man sources exist as potential causes in each event and happen in parallel. Also natural events run interference for man made events. I expect this is leveraged to add confusion.

Therefore your speculation has a counter speculation and brings uncertainty to your stated conclusion. To be fair my "Source 2" natural plasma explanation may have an Achilles heal, is there enough moment in the colliding space rock to both reach high temperature and still retain momentum to reach Earth? Since we don't know what collided we can't answer… yet?

>>103500
Most interesting. We have been fucked over for soooo long.

>>103506
I question that we have innate dignity. But our methods and actions SHOULD be making us collectively dignified by said actions. But it is so easy to fall into deviousness, selfishness, the temptation never ends. It is amazing us animals made it this far, especially when noting the empty universe. Still, I EXPECT us to do better.

7b706 No.103554

>>103544
>Strong EM fields interfere with aircraft, cars and [weak field interferes with] human brains leading to brain malfunction and hallucinations.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920996402004954
>In this study, the hypothesis was tested that seasonal variation in the geomagnetic field of the earth primarily as a result of geomagnetic storms (GMS) at crucial periods in intrauterine brain development, during months 2 to 7 of gestation could affect the later rate of development of schizophrenia.

Add in people growing up in strong magnetic fields, their bodies are magnetically aligned and therefore act like receiving antennas. Induced current flow in the brain can be like putting an electrode on the brain. Spontaneous schizophrenic subconscious imagery overlaid on awake vision. I have read, but I don't have a source, that schizophrenia happens to schizophrenics more often during geomagnetic disturbances. Therefore a subset of the population must be just above the schizophrenia threshold and then in proximity to a magnetic disturbance source could trip over into schizophrenic visions.

If the natural UFO is giving off microwaves… think of the effect that microwave ovens have on metal. Add in the microwave ovens rotate because of peaks and troughs in the intensity of the microwaves in the oven at various locations in the oven due to waves compounding or cancelling each other out. The UFO may not be a mathematically geometric pristine object but a mess of multiple broadcast sources and so at a distance there are peaks and troughs in transmission power.

Now weaponize this during abductions, throw in some small doses of LSD and rubber costumed actors. The abductee has zero hope of knowing what is real. But hypnosis will tell one hellova weird story!

7b706 No.103555

File: 1562047148323-0.jpg (760.41 KB, 1432x2023, 1.jpg)

File: 1562047148323-1.jpg (687.93 KB, 1432x2023, 2.jpg)

>>103497
>Project THUNDER ENGINE

How to tell what is nature and what is man? Whilst the whole time arguing between is it man or ET! LOL!

blue = Mg core, green = Ni hull

58997 No.103575


7b706 No.103607

>>103575
See >>44871

Vril vs Nazis? Chaos fragments everything.

7b706 No.103716

File: 1562207002340-0.png (54.34 KB, 1567x394, select_year_mo_day_count_f….png)

File: 1562207002340-1.png (34.64 KB, 896x597, 2002_xm35_-_1967-07-18_ear….png)

Hmmm, wonder if I can find more like this.

7b706 No.103864

File: 1562312368633-0.png (743.41 KB, 1920x985, Mercury 1946-01-12.png)

File: 1562312368633-1.png (657.16 KB, 1920x985, Mercury 1948-09-06.png)

File: 1562312368633-2.png (46.36 KB, 896x593, Mercury 1950-02-16.png)

The story of events is emerging now!

(1) The colliding object was slowly spiralling down towards the Sun/Mercury. This is an attempt by the object to get into resonance with either Mercury and/or Jupiter. When objects orbit they will approach the gravity well of the various planets, this will speed them up or slow them down depending on the configuration. Ultimately this results in a resonating orbit ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_resonance ).

(2) Unfortunately this object wanted to get to a place whilst Mercury was in the way. Each orbit it swung closer to the Sun, and therefore Mercury, probably causing partial break up and splattering the solar system in small quantities (1896/7 Mystery Airships, 1934 Ghost Fliers) until it side swiped Mercury on the outside (side opposite the sun) around 1946-01-12.

(3) The features of the impact site suggest a double lobed object impacted, the depression is 2 craters and the High Magnesium Region (HMR) is 2 lobed. The splatter went everywhere causing: 1946 Ghost Rockets, 1946+ Great Sunspots, 1947+ Flying Discs, 2002 XM35 core (Core #1) and another unnamed core (Core #2), and a spike in meteor showers.

(4) The unnamed Core #2 continued to orbit but eventually collided with Mercury again about 3-4 years later (assuming it kept a 3-4 year orbit as Taurids tend to do) and embedded itself in Mercury at a site called the Rachmananoff Crater. Which is a unique crater because of its high magnesium content which is what clues us in.

(5) The 1950 March small UFO Wave which had no explanation ( See >>102933 ) came from the second impact of Core #2 onto Mercury. This happened in February 1950 and splashed the Earth in March of 1950 as Earth moved through the debris field from Mercury Collision #2 by Core #2.

(6) All of the splatter and molten metal and glass kept orbiting in order to frighten the semi-intelligent inhabitants of the 3rd planet causing them to speculate, as semi-primitive species do, about which superior intelligence created the great sky objects shaped like glowing/silvery discs. Ultimately they made up a mythology about sky beings visiting them, this then allowed public manipulation for evil clandestine psychological and medical purposes/experiments.

Pics 1-3 are the above 6 steps.

7b706 No.103865

File: 1562315774652-0.jpg (171.38 KB, 983x492, Mercury-Magnesium-HMR-Rach….jpg)

File: 1562315774652-1.png (140.24 KB, 2069x656, Mercury-HMG-Topography-Lat….png)

File: 1562315774652-2.png (141.83 KB, 2068x656, Mercury-HMG-Topography-Lon….png)

File: 1562315774652-3.png (100.8 KB, 2362x984, Mercury--Rachmaninoff crat….png)

>>103864

Pic1 - Topography of Mercury and Mg/Si sites planet wide, showing HMR and Rachmaninoff crater.
Pics 2 & 3 - Cross-sectional Topography of Mercury Collision #1: High Magnesium Region
Pic4 - Cross-sectional Topography of Mercury Collision #2 by Core #2: Rachmaninoff Crater

Core #1 is still flying as 2002 XM35 with a collision adjusted orbit and perhaps some help from Jupiter to keep it away from Mercury. We flew through its tail in 1967 and got splattered by the debris around it for most of the year causing the 1967 massive wave ( >>102933 pic1 )
.

7b706 No.103866

>>103865
>We flew through its tail in 1967
See >>103716

7b706 No.103867

File: 1562323275463-0.jpg (539.81 KB, 1380x690, Mercury_Messenger_USGS_Clr….jpg)

File: 1562323275463-1.jpg (576.15 KB, 1707x845, Rachmaninoff--black low--r….jpg)


7b706 No.103991


7b706 No.103995


7b706 No.104000

>President Trump gets asked about UFO's
https://youtu.be/Ud7cE6FozPo

7b706 No.104116

File: 1562493111905-0.png (239.77 KB, 1209x901, No Taurids 1913-1937.png)

File: 1562493111905-1.png (74.99 KB, 1606x493, Southern Taurids and 1896-….png)

File: 1562493111905-2.png (399.01 KB, 1280x720, yay.png)

I like it when a plan comes together!

I was organising historic science papers that discuss meteor showers so I could more easily see which discussed what meteor showers (Pic1, flag 't' means it discusses the Taurids) and I noticed a lack of discussion of the Taurid meteor showers between 1913-1936 (also noted by Sky and Telescope >>101941 pic2). The Ghost Fliers turn up between 1934-1937. Which got me wondering, do the Taurids turn up when UFOs turn up? I did a deep dive into the Taurids history going back to mid-1800s (am I autistic?) and something unexpected turned up.

The Taurids disappeared between 1891 and 1896 (Pic2). A disappearance for 3-4 years is possible because an orbit takes that long, but 5 years is too much. Also 1896 is a very interesting year because that is when the "Mystery Airships" show up. Not only that, previously the Taurids had mainly come from the Northern Taurids, the Southern Taurids were less prominent. In 1891 both disappeared. This implies they ran out of material to throw at us. In 1896 the Southern Taurids surged and the Northern Taurids remained absent. This surge extended past 1904 (not sure how far yet).

This suggest the Taurids were replenished by some event prior to August 1896. Because we first saw these new Taurids in August that means they came from the direction of the Sun (because of how Taurids orbit) and so we saw them during daylight. This means we could not mistake them for Airships and so they became labelled as meteors. After the meteor stream(s) had orbited over the Earth they went out past Mars orbit and into the Asteroid Belt and came back in through the Earth in October and November. This time they came from the night side of the Earth. With no daylight to examine them, only a bright light visible, it was assumed these were Airships with arc lamps. This resulted in them being classified as UFOs and meteors. Ordinary people and the newspapers assumed that they are manufactured like the few man-made actual airships that are flying around ( >>750 ). UFOlogy wont be giving them up to scientists as meteors, they will keep them as UFOs instead. Scientists will simply ignore them, because paranormal stuff… eww.

The Taurids continued to spray the Earth again in the later half of the year from 1896 onwards.

This is a microcosm prequel of the 1940s-1970s Flying Discs/Saucers. The Mystery Airships are now included in the hypothesis because they, like Ghost Rockets, Ghost Fliers and Flying Discs run parallel to the Taurid meteor showers, and that seems to be mostly from Mercury collisions.

Yay!

ac095 No.104339

>>103521
Was making what few cognitive processes I dare to process with hurt with research outside of study fields your plan, Herr Vril? If so, it is working. The natural order of planetary electromagnetic capture is simple, NOT complex. As stated before: certain planets tend to capture objects of specific metallurgy. The third planet from fun deliberately captures a disproportionate number of small asteroids & meteors partially composed of scientifically thermo-reactive elements. There is not a single alternate explanation for this, bias or no bias.

>>103544
Topography, Herr Vril, is not a simple subject to learn nor is it an easy one to master. No, the Soros grand of stage 1: "aliens are the enemy, we have to kill them!" before stage 2: "aliens are going to save us all with their super-advanced technology!" is failing. The use of overexposure has irredeemably fucked that plan. The average human no longer cares about the (((threat from outer space))), unlike the jewed 1960-86 years. It is… funny to see such a shift.

The term that should only be applied to genetically & philosophically degenerate ASH-CAN-NAZESTS originating from no one fucking cares. The requestee is myself. Please, Herr Vril, have respect for the explorers before you whom are no longer represented in historical terms.

Counter-disagreement: the known universe is dead. There are no magical super-sapient saviors out there. No leak, merely falsified data as it once more points to Jew-S green hats screaming: "but the Martians are coming!" H.G. Wells was a realistic satirist, Herr Vril, not a doomsayer.

You found the source, now investigate the repercussions. Brown rode coattails, failed. Repercussions afterwards. Vril Societe` & friends did not fail until forced underground.

Both primary speculations correct. Combine all known technologies into one package: miniaturization around long before "modern" iterations. Source #2 still contested. Nature is not strange. Unrecorded often, yes.

"New" information arriving soon via dead drop.

7b706 No.104342

>>104339
>Was making what few cognitive processes I dare to process with hurt with research outside of study fields your plan, Herr Vril?
No, but that is a bonus! Stretch that brain! The universe is more complicated than our mental capacity. Hence specialisation. But we have to keep in mind that mysteries can have multiple sources, whilst our brains favour single explanations. If a single explanation does not work completely after 70 years of researchers researching then it is because an additional source component was missing.

>If so, it is working. The natural order of planetary electromagnetic capture is simple, NOT complex. As stated before: certain planets tend to capture objects of specific metallurgy. The third planet from un deliberately captures a disproportionate number of small asteroids & meteors partially composed of scientifically thermo-reactive elements. There is not a single alternate explanation for this, bias or no bias.


Got some sources on this or more details? …… Oh!
https://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/plantblb.htm Bingo!

So the inner planets only have gravity which is a weak force. We have magnetism also. Plasma objects (Mg gas) will have additional reason to come to Earth. And since it is atomised Mg ions, it is thermite ready ( >>87742 ). NICE! Mg reacts with oxygen, nitrogen, iron, silicon and probably others. Feisty.

>Topography, Herr Vril, is not a simple subject to learn nor is it an easy one to master.

So you are studying why land shapes emerge? and applying it to crash sites?

>The term that should only be applied to genetically & philosophically degenerate ASH-CAN-NAZESTS originating from no one fucking cares. The requestee is myself. Please, Herr Vril, have respect for the explorers before you whom are no longer represented in historical terms.

This is spiralling off into confusion. Which term started this? I assume Blitzkrieg the other option would be mermaid! LOL. Okay blacklisted like the E name.

>Counter-disagreement: the known universe is dead. There are no magical super-sapient saviors out there. No leak, merely falsified data as it once more points to Jew-S green hats screaming: "but the Martians are coming!" H.G. Wells was a realistic satirist, Herr Vril, not a doomsayer.

I am not saying ETIs are real. I am saying man-made fake aliens plus craft are about 10%(?) of reports, the remainder is Mg thermite transformed space rocks ( >>103991 >>103995 ). I don't discount the human element and conspiracy but the human element may not make waves of hundreds of "craft" etc. But humans will use the waves to 1) get paranoid and 2) make converts to alien propaganda (Bill Cooper etc).

>Nature is not strange. Unrecorded often, yes.


I am just about done with Stage 1 of this research, I have a decent narrative ( >>103864 ) based on astronomy history. Now I am studying orbital mechanics to see if the narrative is mathematically plausible as a test of the narrative, and I will also look at astro-geology (Stage 2 eg. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A%26A...537A..45H ). I hope to dig up some scientists discussing thermite meteors, all the witness reports are there suggesting such. There is also some interesting stuff re: Mg reacting with nitrogen to make Mg nitrate/nitride and with water leading to ammonia*. And how that relates to Charles Forts “gelatinous residue”.

"Then we shall have so many records of gelatinous substance said to have fallen with meteorites, that, between the two phenomena, some of us will have to accept connection--or that there are at least vast gelatinous areas aloft, and that meteorites tear through, carrying down some of the substance." -- THE BOOK OF THE DAMNED by CHARLES FORT (1919)
It's like shooting fish in a barel at this point.

Stage 3 is relooking at Bloecher's 1947 UFO Wave document through the lens of Stage 1 and 2 and adding in the effect of the source direction and the moon slingshots.

* "Case 105 – June 29 [1947], near Cliff, New Mexico: A rancher near Cliff, named Arthur Howard, reported that he had seen a round, shining object fall to earth in broken country near his ranch so me time during the day. Later, two pilots, Bud Hagen of Hurley and Ed Nelson of Cliff, made an aerial search of the location. They found nothing, but they reported that at one point while flying over the reported landing site their plane flew through a layer of “stinking air” – something for which they could find no explanation." -- Bloecher

7b706 No.104343

File: 1562673057725-0.jpg (179.61 KB, 735x831, wave1.jpg)

File: 1562673057725-1.jpg (292.02 KB, 1303x1802, wave2.jpg)

File: 1562673057725-2.jpg (81.56 KB, 900x574, proceedings_of_1976_the_cu….jpg)

File: 1562673057725-3.jpg (56.39 KB, 900x555, proceedings_of_1976_the_cu….jpg)

File: 1562673057725-4.pdf (2.29 MB, UFO Register - Vol 10 part….pdf)

Fun with the history of the history UFO Waves and Flaps:

>In Air Force terminology a "flap" is a condition, or situation, or state of being of a group of people characterized by an advanced degree of confusion that has not quite yet reached panic proportions. It can be brought on by any number of things, including the unexpected visit of an inspecting general, a major administrative reorganization, the arrival of a hot piece of intelligence information, or the dramatic entrance of a well stacked female into an officers' club bar.


>In early June 1952 the Air Force was unknowingly in the initial stages of a flap - a flying saucer flap - the flying saucer flap of 1952. The situation had never been duplicated before, and it hasn't been duplicated since. All records for the number of UFO reports were not just broken, they were disintegrated. In 1948, 167 UFO reports had come into ATIC; this was considered a big year. In June 1952 we received 149. During the four years the Air Force had been in the UFO business, 615 reports had been collected. During the "Big Flap" our incoming message log showed 717 reports.


>To anyone who had anything to do with flying saucers, the summer of 1952 was just one big swirl of UFO reports, hurried trips, midnight telephone calls, reports to the Pentagon, press interviews, and very little sleep.


-- The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects by Edward Rupelt (1956)

A flap is a human psychological state.


>To Aime Michel, the historian of the development of UFO science must credit the discovery of orthoteny, a term suggested by the discoverer himself. Michel found that the localities in France from which UFO sightings were observed for a given day, when plotted on a map of France, had a very decided tendency to lie along a straight line. When sightings for a given day were unusually numerous, several such alignments could be discerned.

-- http://www.nicap.org/books/coufo/partII/chIX.htm

7b706 No.104459

File: 1562764962159-0.jpg (161.28 KB, 595x842, UFO Register - Vol 07 part….jpg)

File: 1562764962159-1.pdf (4.29 MB, UFO Register - Vol 07 part….pdf)

Turns out I am 40 years behind the curve.

7b706 No.104487

File: 1562793791071.pdf (7.73 MB, BUFORA 1976 - 2nd Confere….pdf)

> .. a 36/37 day cycle became evident. This cycle divides the year into 10 equal divisions ..
> .. Events on 15th August and 28th October might just be attributable to the Perseids and the Taurids, respectively ..
> .. Then the idea occurred to me that if these objects had originated from space in a planned way, there might be a series of orbits or Great Circles involved. ..
> .. There is evidence to link periodic fireball events with other UFO activity, and it has been implied that such events could signal the arrival (or departure) of an alien device. ..
-- BUFORA 1976 - 2nd conference, Birmingham. Various prominent researchers papers (pp. 104-131)

Woah! So close! Then blamm had to pull in aliens, *sigh*

ac095 No.104602

>>104342
Stop. giving. me. home. work. damn. you. That meme aside, currently have far too many specializations before factoring external support. My generation of COMINT combined 40 previous strains of processes, all once separated as singular disciplines. Hard to reconcile, not patient with frustration.

Bingo correct. Your earlier topography charts created a suspicion of 'why do specific planets attract certain asteroids, meteors, comets?' Have been cross-referencing provided information with.. new hyper-paranoid colleague. Factual result: based on previous LDRA experience, isolate frequencies of surviving impacts based upon material compositions versus those that burn out/burp up proves demonstrable affects of planetary electromagnetic friction-ignition based on metallurgy. "Silicon 71" was quoted as Japanese project after Pact of Steel in 1943. Was called 'flash paper', could be ignited with tiny spark, burned to nothing in <1 second, left no traces or evidence. Next question: why is third planet from fun so special? Equally strange answer: "electromorphogenic field". Lacking data on this one, deeply buried.

Examining impacts on Saturn, Mars, etc. vs. impacts on this planet shows eerily precise metallurgical captures. Multiple waves of objects impact during certain rotations based on solar activity. Again, why? Baffling answer: solar flares correlate with increased capture ratios of dense asteroids/meteors, solar dimming correlates with increased low density comets/meteors.

It starts with N+3 letters and ends with "hostile propaganda created by (((Allied powers)))". Question: how many shekelbergs can one fit in an ashtray? Answer: how big is the ashtray.

Funny how topography shows waves correlate with human discoveries: hydrogen & helium-loaded comets produce bright, specific colorations upon impact with outer magnetosphere. Humans experimented to find which color is produced, eventually come up with solutions, used as new fuels. Old lead found based on archive files: Project HIGHBIRD in 1963, black budget, related to Nigger Bird. Researchers discover hydrogen-loaded ice comets perform curious impacts, some leave recoverable debris in Arctic, January 1964. Pursuit of advancement creates hydrogen-slush fuel. NOT hard to find. Expensive until 1968: cold fuel-cell technologies research completed by Dipshit Asshats, also correlates with black budget increase pre-Vietnam Whore. Fully explains which fuel the Mach 2+ craft were using until 1987.

Data line: sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets? Speculation incomplete for now. However: Red Rains of India experience consistent impacts of comets containing large amounts of sulphur, sheets of foul smelling gel often noted on water bodies. "Nature, you so crazy-'

7b706 No.104636

File: 1562839774316-0.jpg (98.11 KB, 960x720, sun convective zone.jpg)

File: 1562839774316-1.jpg (18.15 KB, 500x375, sun rotation.jpg)

File: 1562839774316-2.jpg (7.86 KB, 300x231, dalsgaard1_density_vs_r.jpg)

>>104602
>Stop. giving. me. home. work. damn. you. […] Hard to reconcile, not patient with frustration.
:) Now the show is on the other foot. Get your own personal wiki software ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_software ) make your own wikipedia. Then you can forget whenever you like and re-read later. Mine educates me despite having written it all. Collect documents and index them, then "search engine" them. Get mind-map software ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_map ). Sort documents with https://calibre-ebook.com/

>Examining impacts on Saturn, Mars, etc. vs. impacts on this planet shows eerily precise metallurgical captures.

Source?

>Multiple waves of objects impact during certain rotations based on solar activity. Again, why? Baffling answer: solar flares correlate with increased capture ratios of dense asteroids/meteors, solar dimming correlates with increased low density comets/meteors.


I have noticed this also ( pic3 >>101892 ) so has >>104459 indirectly. I have a proposal for the sun spot situation.

The sun's upper 30% is the density of water or less (pic3). This is convective (pic1) and the sun rotates unevenly per latitude (pic2).

The convection is a convection of ions, so this makes the E and M field (line)s. The uneven rotation builds up field line stresses which snap and cause normal sun spots as the field lines rise up through the photosphere. It's a cycle of build up and burst. Left alone this would be a simple sine wave cycle. But the sun isn't left alone…

The sun grazers https://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=sungrazers also I expect it will have meteoid and asteroid impacts too. These probably don't make it into the sun as solid objects but as a cloud of dense atomic nuclei, this cloud can make it through partially, the denser the ion the more likely it can pass through the sea of light dispersed gaseous or liquid-like Hydrogen (a natural space element filter). The more shallow the strike the more lightweight material makes it and the more cohesion is kept. >>101892 pic3 might be an entry and exit wound, either the 2 big spots and/or the small one. The interesting part is that any passthrough of the suns convective zone can start on the far side of the sun from us so we never see the initiator. This seems to be the case for the Great Sunspot of 1946 initiated by the Mercury impact.

But passing through the sun may not be needed, a metallic object skirting the sun might attract upwards the magnetic field lines and make the dual sunspots also.

So the sun makes the generic rise and fall in sunspots and the solar impacts create the noise that overlays the sunspot cycle.

Now combine both into a worst case scenario. The sun is at high tension (about 50% along towards the sunspot peak date) and then a large blob of molten metal from Mercury collision heads towards the Sun. Impact was January 29, 1946 or earlier (we saw the sunspot rotate into view on 29th), some maths therefore suggests (assuming free fall towards the sun): Mercury impact at 1946-01-10, Mercury-Sun distance: 67.688 M kms = 19.614 days free fall time. The metallic impact/flyby on the sun released the built up solar tension, both together made the Great Sunspots because the blob and its friends orbited for a while. ( http://www.cv-helios.net/RGO-NOAA-USAF.pdf , page 6, MvH is millionths of solar hemisphere in size. Note: the biggest ones are dated 1946-1951. Direct correlation between massive UFO waves and sun getting splattered.)

Problems with this are, why do the sunspot cycle times actually change over time? ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_cycles ) Sun spot cycles aren't regular… nor are meteors in orbit… What if the suns tension/release cycle would be, lets say, 14 years if left alone? What if the ebb and flow of sungrazing space rocks is cutting it short? What if the ebb and flow of the sun spot cycle, is the ebb and flow of orbiting space rocks which is the ebb and flow of UFO waves?

7b706 No.104637

File: 1562840772872-0.jpg (42.41 KB, 900x691, dalsgaard1_density_vs_r_bi….jpg)

File: 1562840772872-1.png (90.94 KB, 579x277, metallic_prominences_conta….png)

File: 1562840772872-2.jpg (71.05 KB, 612x455, double_magnesium_in_sunspo….jpg)

File: 1562840772872-3.png (319.16 KB, 1414x918, magnesium_and_potasium_in_….png)

>>104602
>>104636
Better sun density pic. (pic1).
Also source: https://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/interior.shtml

Also metal in solar flares, stuff I randomly came across. (Pic2-4) Note that the elements associated to the wave lengths of light by those papers is disputed by me. But they can be fixed using https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html

And "metallic" prominences ( http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1946PASP...58...86N [click Send PDF] ).

7b706 No.104638

File: 1562842665093-0.jpg (116.43 KB, 2513x1447, 19460226_mwil_drawing_side….jpg)

File: 1562842665093-1.jpg (106.31 KB, 2513x1447, 19460227_mwil_drawing_side….jpg)

File: 1562842665093-2.jpg (111.95 KB, 2513x1447, 19460228_mwil_drawing_side….jpg)

File: 1562842665093-3.png (79.58 KB, 1045x775, Untitled.png)

File: 1562842665093-4.png (137.78 KB, 640x640, Reeeeeee.png)

>>104637
>>104602
Pic1-3 - Metallic prominences as per observations in Feb, 1946 from http://fenyi.solarobs.csfk.mta.hu/GPR/index.html Note the objects above the solar disc edge.

Pic4 - correlations between sun spot size (+3000 MvH) and UFO reports, also timing between them is similar to Solar Cycle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_cycles (9-14 years for both)

Solar cycle starts shrinking after the Mystery Airships.
Solar cycle shrinks by over a year after the Taurids go missing ( pic1 >>104116 ).
Are these related?

This broken fracturing solar system mechanical clock is too complicated! REEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! ASTEROIDS GET OUT!!!!

7b706 No.104640

File: 1562849015722-0.jpg (226.64 KB, 1158x956, colors.jpg)

File: 1562849015722-1.jpg (52.56 KB, 352x541, fireballs 1963.jpg)

File: 1562849015722-2.png (38.12 KB, 1567x394, chart.png)

>>104602

>Examining impacts on Saturn, Mars, etc. vs. impacts on this planet shows eerily precise metallurgical captures.

How exactly are you sampling impacts on Saturn and Mars??? Hmmmm!!?

N word gone.

>Funny how topography shows waves correlate with human discoveries: hydrogen & helium-loaded comets produce bright, specific colorations upon impact with outer magnetosphere.


What colours? I assume purple ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen ) and Yellow-Red ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium ) but I, in my bias, could say purple is the red of Iron/Silica and the blue of Mg mixed. Or the yellow-red is silica ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass ). We need to talk in light frequency specifics to get anywhere. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/lines_form.html

But gives me a chance to dump another table. The colors of UFOs. Pic1

>Humans experimented to find which color is produced, eventually come up with solutions, used as new fuels. Old lead found based on archive files: Project HIGHBIRD in 1963, black budget, related to Nigger Bird. Researchers discover hydrogen-loaded ice comets perform curious impacts, some leave recoverable debris in Arctic, January 1964.


URL: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu
Search: year:1960-1965 title:"fireball"
Result: (pic2)

UFOCAT: (pic3)

The fast objects arrive first (see >>90720 pic1), flybys first, wobblers second. First group is logged by scientists, second group is logged by UFOlogists. They don't compare notes.

>Pursuit of advancement creates hydrogen-slush fuel. NOT hard to find. Expensive until 1968: cold fuel-cell technologies research completed by Dipshit Asshats, also correlates with black budget increase pre-Vietnam Whore. Fully explains which fuel the Mach 2+ craft were using until 1987.


Which brings me to a modification of my "how this all fits together":

1) Man does normal slow progress on aircraft
2) Public very excited despite it being slow and ordinary progression
3) Nature add weird celestial objects which wobble about and glow intensely
4a) Everyone panics and gets curious and makes up paranoid answers.
4b) Military does the very best paranoia, panic and research.
5a) Feeds results into aircraft design.
5b) Feeds results into public manipulation and exploitation.
5c) Public excitability and propaganda seeds anthropomorphising natural objects (and clandestine abductions) into aliens.

So lets say man-made and nature-made is 50/50. We both are 2 sides of the one coin.

>Data line: sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets? Speculation incomplete for now. However:


>Red Rains of India experience consistent impacts of comets containing large amounts of sulphur, sheets of foul smelling gel often noted on water bodies. "Nature, you so crazy-'


"Case 211 – July 4, Hillsboro, Texas: An object about the size and shape of an ordinary saucer, that had not been seen in flight, was found in the garden of Bob Scott, a farmer living two and a half miles east of Hillsboro. Scott said that when he found it, “it was bright as a blow-torch, but it didn't burn me when I picked it up. I got to thinking about all these new inventions now-days, and it scared me. So I put it down. It sure didn't belong in my garden,” he added. He didn't mention the discovery until he met a friend, W. O. Kissick, and when the two of them went to investigate the object they found that it was disintegrating. Another friend, Joe Gerrick, of Hillsboro, also examined it and said that one of the remaining pieces “looked like tinfoil,” but when they picked it up “it appeared to be celluloid.” Whatever it was, most of it seemed to “have melted,” subliming into a gelatinous residue. The men contacted Hillsboro newsman Dan Shults, who also viewed the remains. “It was a dusty, silvery substance,” he reported. “I picked up some of the pieces and it wasn't like anything I'd ever seen before.” Unfortunately, it seems that none of the material was given to appropriate authorities for analysis." -- http://nicap.org/waves/Wave47Rpt/ReportOnWaveOf1947.pdf

What if it isn't sulphur?

Old notes, not reverified, handing over the verification to you: :P

Baby Flying Disc -> water -> gelatinous residue. In addition to magnesium oxide produced in the air, also magnesium nitrate was produced. (The air is 80% nitrogen.) This breaks down into magnesium oxide and nitrogen dioxide. NO2 below 21C is a liquid. NO2 liquid plus MgO powder would make a “gelatinous residue”.

2 Mg(NO3)2 → 2 MgO + 4 NO2 + O2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_nitrate

Nitrogen dioxide is a reddish-brown gas above 21.2 °C (70.2 °F; 294.3 K) with a pungent, acrid odor, becomes a yellowish-brown liquid below 21.2 °C (70.2 °F; 294.3 K)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_dioxide

Getting temperatures of the location of the gelatinous stuff might be interesting.

Magnesium nitride reacts with water to produce magnesium hydroxide and ammonia gas, as do many metal nitrides.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_nitride

The magnesium meteor becomes magnesium nitride and magnesium nitrate lands in water, or using water from the air, generates ammonia gas or breaks down into nitrogen dioxide and magnesium oxide and oxygen.

Also there was a case of a UFO being captured by a farmer, it was red in color (I assume rust because the area had lots of rain* and the residue of iron after the bulk of the iron fractured off), became red, but could be red rain NO2 etc related. The farmer placed the object on the ground to go through a fence, the object started rotating internally, 4 bands of light flared up around it and it levitated away. I am trying to think on how to relocate the story…

(cont.)

7b706 No.104641

File: 1562849755255.gif (403.97 KB, 400x357, reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.gif)

>>104640

(cont.)

Note for above:

* Some rain is actually comet water >>750 Attach#1 <- probably a fragment of Comet 3D/Biela which started breaking up in 1832 because it ran into the Leonid meteor stream (2005AJ….130.1286J) and then the Leonids meteor storm occurred in 1833 >>102001. Biela was most visibly separated in 1846-1852. At this point the Taurid meteor showers did not exist. But in 1846 at what will become the Southern Taurids, "Hind's [First] Comet" is seen (1846MNRAS…7R.162H). Clouds then disallow Hind from relocating said comet ever again. And in 1852 a "Nebula" appears at the point in the sky where the Northern Taurids will come from. (1864MNRAS..24…65H). Then in 1861 the Northern Taurids arrive (maybe 1845 but can't verify source), then in 1869 the Southern Taurids arrive. (1904JBAA…14..358D). So the root of all of this might be Comet Biela seppuku in 1832. It is also what made humanity work out meteor showers are astronomical when it did a replay in 1866 as per a 33 year cycle. This implies we didn't have a situation that warranted working out the meteor mystery before 1833.

COMETS GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

7b706 No.104642

>>104641
… and the first wave of the UFO mystery.. 1896/7.

7b706 No.104643

File: 1562854897628-0.jpg (243.75 KB, 841x675, Venusian-Contacts-VII-main….jpg)

File: 1562854897628-1.jpg (336.07 KB, 1308x1642, fsr_1962_sep-oct_v_8_n_5--….jpg)

File: 1562854897628-2.jpg (378.47 KB, 1308x1688, fsr_1962_sep-oct_v_8_n_5--….jpg)

File: 1562854897628-3.jpg (348.55 KB, 1305x1616, fsr_1962_sep-oct_v_8_n_5--….jpg)

File: 1562854897628-4.png (389.97 KB, 1280x720, happy.png)

Fun with old UFOlogy and waves/cycles:

I like the idea that the Maury Island Incident gets included in top place in my hypothesis. It is an up close and personal look at how a Mg/Fe/Si metal blob operates >>101892 despite the fact that it is universally derided as a hoax.

Lets include some more former cooks into this hypothesis! UFOs surge when Mars and Venus are close so the Martians and Venusians can visit us! Who knows what Venus is like under the clouds? Maybe a lush rainforest? And Mars has canals for irrigation! Don't look at me like that, anon!

What if Martians and Venusians actually are visiting us?! Except they aren't alive, they are molten blobs caught by gravity of that planet and thrown back at the Earth? The Earth gets an uptick in sightings as they get closer together. This is like the moon bumps. >>89607 The cooks are less cooky! Look at pic4!

More cycles to add to the endless list of orbiting cycles!

7b706 No.104644

File: 1562855950767-0.gif (306.05 KB, 432x334, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa….gif)

>>104643
PLANETS GET OUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

7b706 No.104752

File: 1562933954874.png (75.09 KB, 1000x566, 1963and1967.png)


7b706 No.104929

File: 1563114934664.png (367.75 KB, 960x671, dlxsegu7q6a31.png)


ac095 No.104968

>>104636
>>104637
Horses don't usually wear clothes Neither do ponies.

New "colleague": low confidence, hyper-paranoia. Strict access given, strict rules followed. Zero traces aside from non-exceptional baseline data allowed, no choice in matter.

>>104638
Direct relation. See recorded Mercury waves of impacts. Calculate stable & unstable orbits of "debris". Recalculate based on mineral compositions, isolate determining factors. Applied same to third planet from fun. Solar cycle brightening correlates to increases of capture ratio = 'electromorphogenic field'. One drop at a time. Theory: each planet's electromagnetic field shifts captures based on solar cycle. I refuse to investigate this further, too maddening.

>>104640
More later, not now.

Coloration matters less than knowing extent of emerging panic technologies. New lead: Hydrogen-2, also known as "deuterium", isolated in 1931. Sound familiar? "Heavy water" experiments related to emerging fear of nuclear technologies. (((Allies))) spend equivalent of 30 trillion shekels from 1938-1945. 1946 results: terrifying. Mutant strain devotees refused to work on "esoteric weapons", shelved into black budgets for later date. Neutron weapons in early 70's proven, confirmed, built, used under Carter. How? EM Drive project is complete sham, not new tech at all.

Sulphur is one identification for specific morbid scents encountered. Verified, now correlated as consistent with discovery in 1898 based on a study of magnesium chloride: polyethylene. You're welcome.

>>104752
"Time" is still a straight arrow.

7b706 No.104969

File: 1563198606690.jpg (189.91 KB, 1716x1632, flowchart.jpg)

>>104968
>See recorded Mercury waves of impacts.
The capacity to monitor Mercury was extremely limited to be laughable historically. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1947PA.....55..137H . So do share your "waves of impact data", please :D

>I refuse to investigate this further, too maddening.

It is, thousands of trails all logical but too many.
I am working on information organisation methods/software. Pic. Clickable flow diagrams in a wiki.

>emerging fear of nuclear technologies.

"Improvements in or relating to the transmutation of chemical elements" (GB 1934)
https://patents.google.com/patent/GB440023A/en

>Sulphur is one identification for specific morbid scents encountered.


"Mercury’s surface gravity is more than twice that of the Moon, partly because of the great density of the planet’s huge iron-sulfur core."
https://www.britannica.com/place/Mercury-planet/Impact-craters
"Messenger used X-ray fluorescence spectra to study the surface composition of Mercury. It found a high ratio of magnesium to silicon and low ratios of aluminum and calcium to silicon, which showed that the crust was not rich in feldspar like that of the Moon. The surface is rich in sulfur, about 20 times richer than the surfaces of Earth…"
https://www.britannica.com/place/Mercury-planet/Surface-composition

"Some work [2-5] suggests that immiscible sulfides residing in the melts, especially CaS and MgS, might decompose during daytime heating or be released by interactions with the solar wind [1]."
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/pdf/2585.pdf

"Production and Preservation of Sulfide Layering in the Mercury's Mantle"
"A striking feature of the Mercury's surface is the high S and low FeO contents of the surface currently best explained by very reducing conditions compared to other terrestrial bodies."

https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFMMR23B0087B/abstract

Sulphur might be a easy indicator of Mercury origin. Which brings up something I failed to consider. Mercury's crust is being thrown about the solar system.

7b706 No.104970

File: 1563202080339.jpg (394.59 KB, 1100x1294, Ghost Rockets Slag Sulphur….jpg)

>>104968
One thing my chart >>104969 made me realise was that Ghost Rockets often landed in lakes. Aside from the actual lakes these extremely hot objects would have melted ice/snow and made their own "lakes" also, perhaps so fast they literally splashed down hence the reports of splashes. And then, of course being natural, left no non-natural indications. Maybe they should have looked for sulphur?

Or maybe there was no point…

"Slag is the glass-like by-product left over after a desired metal has been separated (i.e., smelted) from its raw ore. Slag is usually a mixture of metal oxides and silicon dioxide. However, slags can contain metal sulfides and elemental metals."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slag

Pic.

7b706 No.104975

>An early warning system for meteorite impacts capable of destroying whole cities is on alert this week as the Earth passes through a vast trail of cosmic debris.

>Astronomers are focusing their attention on the constellation Ara in a patch of sky lying due south after sunset in the Emirates. Calculations show this is likely to give the best view of the contents of the so-called Taurid Complex, a trail of material left by a giant comet that disintegrated after entering the solar system thousands of years ago.


>They are searching for signs of meteors similar to the 100-metre object which plunged through the Earth’s atmosphere in June 1908 and exploded over Siberia with the violence of 1,000 Hiroshima atomic bombs.


http://earthmysterynews.com/2019/07/08/earths-new-early-warning-meteor-impact-system-is-needed-more-than-ever/

also MIC needs things to shoot at.

7b706 No.105022

File: 1563237437182.jpg (145.14 KB, 901x1024, tt.jpg)

>>104968
>New "colleague": low confidence, hyper-paranoia. Strict access given, strict rules followed. Zero traces aside from non-exceptional baseline data allowed, no choice in matter.
Pic, can I borrow it?

>The Origin of Sunspots - A New Hypothesis (2003)

>Recent observations of sunspots, the high temperature of the corona and CMEs strongly suggest that they are all caused by highly energetic solid bodies falling into the Sun. This hypothesis is consistent with the rapid (3000 mph) downward flow of gases in sunspot interiors observed by SOHO, their lower temperatures, and the presence of large quantities of water in their spectra. The high velocity of the incoming body entrains the surface gases, carrying them rapidly downward. The vaporization of the bodies cools the local gases and the water released from the bodies produces the observed spectra. Solar flares and CMEs comprise the material splashed from the impact perimeter.

>The estimated velocity of the 'tadpoles,' 400 miles/sec implies that they fell from the vicinity of Jupiter's orbit. Interestingly, the average sunspot cycle is close to the period of Jupiter, not the period of a body falling from Jupiter in a Sun grazing orbit. I suggest that the modulation of sunspot activity, illustrated by the well-known butterfly diagram, is due to millions of bodies which have been ejected from Jupiter's Great Red Spot
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AGUFMSH42B0546A/abstract

I was on board until the Red Spot ejections. WTH. How about Jupiter disturbs/corrals orbiting meteoroids every 11.862 years whose orbits go out close to Jupiter and sends a denser stream to the sun. This might be the cause of the 4 year orbit limit for periodic meteor (shower)s. Longer than that and Jupiter will mess it up when they meet about every 11-12 years. Jupiter is a bully.

7b706 No.105202

>Studying the surface of Mercury with BepiColombo
>Volatile elements like sulfur have been detected with unexpectedly high abundances of up to 4%.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AGUFM.P53A2108H/abstract

7b706 No.105256

File: 1563373104848.jpg (314.45 KB, 2158x1193, figure5a.jpg)

>>104602
>Data line: sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets? Speculation incomplete for now. However: Red Rains of India experience consistent impacts of comets containing large amounts of sulphur, sheets of foul smelling gel often noted on water bodies. "Nature, you so crazy-'

>>104968
>Sulphur is one identification for specific morbid scents encountered. Verified, now correlated as consistent with discovery in 1898 based on a study of magnesium chloride: polyethylene. You're welcome.

Slowly tracking down the story with Mercury and Sulphur:

"Although there is not yet a spatially resolved S/Si measurement for the Rachmaninoff annular plains, the HMR (with a generally high 430 nm/1020 nm reflectance ratio) contains the highest S/Si ratios we have measured on the planet (Fig. 5a)."
-- 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.01.023 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000448

Rachmaninoff is where I propose a secondary impact occurred and HMR is the primary. The sulphur comes from the impacts excavating it from under Mercury crust. And it measures at 4%. >>105202 What if both sulphur and amonia happens together? Sulphur doesn't react with water but does burn.

7b706 No.105257

>³²S is created inside massive stars, at a depth where the temperature exceeds 2.5×109 K, by the fusion of one nucleus of silicon plus one nucleus of helium.[18] As this nuclear reaction is part of the alpha process that produces elements in abundance, sulfur is the 10th most common element in the universe.

>Sulfur, usually as sulfide, is present in many types of meteorites. Ordinary chondrites contain on average 2.1% sulfur, and carbonaceous chondrites may contain as much as 6.6%. It is normally present as troilite (FeS), but there are exceptions, with carbonaceous chondrites containing free sulfur, sulfates and other sulfur compounds.[19] The distinctive colors of Jupiter's volcanic moon Io are attributed to various forms of molten, solid, and gaseous sulfur.[20]


-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfur#Natural_occurrence

Sulphur is everywhere.

>>104602
>sulphur is found <0.1% of time in asteroids or meteors, but why >15% of comets?

Sulphur melting point: 115.21°C.

The sulphur could be stored in various compounds such as:
>Carbonyl sulfide is a colorless, poisonous, flammable gas with a distinct sulfide odor.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/10039
>Melting point: −138.8 °C
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonyl_sulfide

Comets can more easily hold onto it because they are colder most of the time. Asteroids/meteroids, that we are concerned with, are closer to the sun and reaching Mercury closeness would make them about 500C. They will lose (surface level) sulphur (compounds).

There is much debate about the chemical process leading to sulphur in comet comas but I see no one being surprised sulphur is there at all.


[View All] (441 posts and 412 image replies omitted)
[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ mlpol / qa / go / 1ntr / vx / cyb / sp / üb / a ] [ Overboard ] [ Statistics / Banlist / Search ] [ PonyX ] [ Policy / Store ] [ home ]