Mister Vril Society Made a thread in which he asserts his premise that UFOs are man's doings & aliens man's imaginings. I am at odds with this for I have found possible evidence. In picture 1 counting from right to left we see to the right what is known as the The Starchild Skull next to an ordinary skull.
>The Starchild Skull's provenance begins in the 1930s.
>During the 1930s an American teenage girl >went on holiday to Mexico with her family, >who were of Mexican heritage. While >visiting a small village in Mexico's >Copper Canyon region she went exploring on >her own and discovered an abandoned mine >tunnel. Inside it she found a full human >skeleton lying on its back. Beside it was >an area of disturbed ground with an arm >bone sticking out of the dirt and the hand >bones wrapped around the upper arm bone of >the skeleton lying on the surface. Using >her hands she dug the buried skeleton >which she described as smaller than the >other, and "misshapen" out of its shallow grave.
>The girl gathered up all of the bones, and >hid them nearby with the intention of >returning for them later during her >vacation. She claimed that at some point >soon afterwards there was a flash flood >that washed most of the bones away, >however the girl found the two skulls, the >misshapen one now damaged, lodged in >debris along the flood path, and took them >home with her back to Texas, USA, where >she kept them the rest of her life.
Pictures 2,3,4,5, & 6 are the so called elongated Paracas skulls, potentially not of this world.
There is variety among the Paracas long skulls, which I didn't categorized. As if there were different races of long skull
humanoids. Main stream science states that these skulls are artificially deformed by headbinding.
What is funny is that if you scroll down nigh the bottom of the page you'll see picture 6 which according to Wikipedia is
Dr. Leopold Muller lithography of a fetus, in the intrauterine position, with the typical huanca skull shape in the Spanish
version of the 'Peruvian Antiquities' (1851) which was found in a mummy of a pregnant woman.
>headbinding begins approximately a month after birth and continues for about six months.
You mean to tell me that the baby's head was that way at birth, bah humbug the drawing is a fake!
What? Not enough evidence for you?
Feast your eyen upon image 5 which is a new born child. that's too shore of a time for the child's head to elongate like that. Note in image 3 we see that the hair still on the skull is a dark red which unlike the dark haired natives leads me to believe that this individual would have had a light complexion.
Excerpt fro video
"Whatever the sample labeled 3A has came from - it had mtDNA with mutation unknown in any human, primate or animal known so far. The data are very sketchy though and a LOT of sequencing still needs to be done to recover the complete mtDNA sequence. but a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample 3A indicate that if these mutation will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans.. I am not sure it will even fit into the known Evolutionary tree. the question is if they were so different, they could not interbreed with humans. breeding within their small population, they may have degenerated due to inbreeding. That would explain buried children- they were either low or not viable."
If you would like to look at more long skulls go
and here: https://www.youtube.com/user/brienfoerster/
pictures 7 & 8 are of the Atacama humanoid of which I'm not versed well
enough to speak of, but provide you with the fact that it exists.
Dare you figure?