Forgive them.
Now,
Command that which ails you thus:
"Go to my GOD, and to my lord Jesus Christ and pray with all thine heart, all thine mind, all thine spirit, all thine faculties, all thine body, all thine strength, all thine being, and all thine self. Pray as one ought. Pray GOD turns your heart to GOD. Pray GOD turns all you are towards GOD. Amen."
Peace be upon you.
You shall know them by their works, send them. By name, by being, by identity, by identifier, by fruit, by work, or by which you name It.
Speak/Think at It.
Send them.
Be not glad you command such, be glad your name is written in heaven.
Be glad.
Partake in the Good Word. Pray so as to talk with GOD, Jesus Christ, your guardian angel. Turn towards GOD and give everything and more.
Rejoice.
For your Wife/Husband, your children, your mother, your father, your brother, your sister may also be prayed in this way.
For Catholics they must be by Blood.
For everyone and everything else.
Do thus:
"My GOD, I ask to be in accordance with your will. I ask that my words and works are in accordance with your will. I ask what ought I do?"
Do as GOD WILLS.
-t. Anonymous. Source: in accordance.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): 31BF603AC929791D4777A8DB749697A0-238383.png (232.8 KB, 2800x1990, 1734355.png)
344 replies and 244 files omitted.
>>168273
>implying
Sure, I imply many ugly things, but I have no access to the Vatican's archives be take a further look.
>implying
Sure, I imply many ugly things, but I have no access to the Vatican's archives be take a further look.
>>168270
These are some basic, easily refuted statements about the world. Statements that we can categorically refute and could for centuries, some of which were refuted even before the new testament was penned. Which is, again, my point. These people were fallible and wrote the scripture with their flaws in understanding in mind. Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
These are some basic, easily refuted statements about the world. Statements that we can categorically refute and could for centuries, some of which were refuted even before the new testament was penned. Which is, again, my point. These people were fallible and wrote the scripture with their flaws in understanding in mind. Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>>168274
Actually, I think the documents for how this piece was commissioned is public record. You might be able to research it in detail, although it might require travel.
Actually, I think the documents for how this piece was commissioned is public record. You might be able to research it in detail, although it might require travel.
>>168275
>Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>sophistry
It is what it is. Heresy.
>Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>sophistry
It is what it is. Heresy.
>>168279
If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses. There's enough retardation in the good book to do the job without any extra layers of Satanic conspiracy.
If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses. There's enough retardation in the good book to do the job without any extra layers of Satanic conspiracy.
>>168280
>If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses.
I have a theory. Satanists must tell in the people's face what they are doing, and most of the time faggots will dismiss it. It is part of their alchemy.
>If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses.
I have a theory. Satanists must tell in the people's face what they are doing, and most of the time faggots will dismiss it. It is part of their alchemy.
>>168281
If someone has to explain why a one inch bit of tucked-away skin is heresy, then maybe it's not in our face. If your foundational fucking text is full of inaccuracies, but it's held up as the word of God himself, then either God is misleading us, humans fallibly attributed it, or the very act of putting the books together was heresy. I like to see it in the simplest way: fallible people wrote what they thought to be true as a means of adding some credence to the simpler masses. No supernatural elements or worldwide conspiracy of a religious order against itself needed.
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Not sure who you're referring to but I don't even use telegram. Why would I? It's had data issues for years and most of its users are massive fucking creeps.
If someone has to explain why a one inch bit of tucked-away skin is heresy, then maybe it's not in our face. If your foundational fucking text is full of inaccuracies, but it's held up as the word of God himself, then either God is misleading us, humans fallibly attributed it, or the very act of putting the books together was heresy. I like to see it in the simplest way: fallible people wrote what they thought to be true as a means of adding some credence to the simpler masses. No supernatural elements or worldwide conspiracy of a religious order against itself needed.
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Not sure who you're referring to but I don't even use telegram. Why would I? It's had data issues for years and most of its users are massive fucking creeps.
>>168286
For a tourist he sure seems to have planted his feet in this thread for quite a while. Unless there's an /mlpol/ telegram I'm unaware of.
For a tourist he sure seems to have planted his feet in this thread for quite a while. Unless there's an /mlpol/ telegram I'm unaware of.
>>168282
By the way, any phonefag is a retarded faggot who the deserves every bit of the (((tech))) he uses.
By the way, any phonefag is a retarded faggot who the deserves every bit of the (((tech))) he uses.
File (): 1C4E4A2B11BE7F818FADA7C5AB09FC36-40441.jpg (39.5 KB, 757x788, b179d419edc5526f745168c60ce5ff6c.jpg)
>>168277
You're bullshitting everyone in this thread. Unironically accusing Titian of being a heretic satanist when he was a devout Christian who's work went on to inspire and define and western culture as we know it in ways that brought revolutionized art. How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
>>168281
They could literally just have rewritten the entire bible, ffs, and you think belly buttons are what they did?
I don't believe even a single person has questioned the legitimacy of the Genesis after viewing The Fall Of Man because of the freaking belly buttons.
>>168262
By the way, this particular piece wasn't even commissioned by the church. It was commissioned by Gonzalo Pérez as a private piece in his mansion: it was not made for public display, let alone some plot to subvert genesis canon. It only entered the Spanish Roya collection because it is so beautiful. You did zero research and clearly have no idea what you're talking about: you are talking out your ass. And despite not knowing the first thing about the painting, you went ahead and implicitly accused Titian of being a satanist trying to subvert Christianity by painting Adam with a belly button.
You know, I liked a couple of your posts in this thread, but the commutative baseless nonsense and this abject disrespect for white culture has caused me to lose all respect for you and your schizo ramblings. You know nothing about art, nothing about history, and your reading comprehension for scripture is dubious.
You're bullshitting everyone in this thread. Unironically accusing Titian of being a heretic satanist when he was a devout Christian who's work went on to inspire and define and western culture as we know it in ways that brought revolutionized art. How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
>>168281
They could literally just have rewritten the entire bible, ffs, and you think belly buttons are what they did?
I don't believe even a single person has questioned the legitimacy of the Genesis after viewing The Fall Of Man because of the freaking belly buttons.
>>168262
By the way, this particular piece wasn't even commissioned by the church. It was commissioned by Gonzalo Pérez as a private piece in his mansion: it was not made for public display, let alone some plot to subvert genesis canon. It only entered the Spanish Roya collection because it is so beautiful. You did zero research and clearly have no idea what you're talking about: you are talking out your ass. And despite not knowing the first thing about the painting, you went ahead and implicitly accused Titian of being a satanist trying to subvert Christianity by painting Adam with a belly button.
You know, I liked a couple of your posts in this thread, but the commutative baseless nonsense and this abject disrespect for white culture has caused me to lose all respect for you and your schizo ramblings. You know nothing about art, nothing about history, and your reading comprehension for scripture is dubious.
>>168289
>There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
No evidence needed. It is called Faith and you take it as it is.
>There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
No evidence needed. It is called Faith and you take it as it is.
>>168292
And God couldn't create them with belly buttons, so that they would match his omniscient vision for mankind? God gave Adam nipples: he works in mysterious ways.
And God couldn't create them with belly buttons, so that they would match his omniscient vision for mankind? God gave Adam nipples: he works in mysterious ways.
>>168293
Go on, if you keep on the slippery track soon you'll end up claiming the Adam was non-binary. /s
Go on, if you keep on the slippery track soon you'll end up claiming the Adam was non-binary. /s
>>168294
>claiming God made Adam with a navel because everything is in his image is the same as claiming that Adam was nonbinary
You are such a massive faggot that it's unreal.
>claiming God made Adam with a navel because everything is in his image is the same as claiming that Adam was nonbinary
You are such a massive faggot that it's unreal.
>>168290
Also, reply to the rest of the post, faggot. You accused Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing the context in which this painting was commissioned. You don't even know what you're talking about
>>168294
Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
Also, reply to the rest of the post, faggot. You accused Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing the context in which this painting was commissioned. You don't even know what you're talking about
>>168294
Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
>>168296
No, your intention is clear. You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture, all because they made them with bellybuttons. And even aside from that, you claim the notion that people have flawed understanding of the world is just "mind games." Anon, do you remember what you ate for lunch or dinner six weeks ago on the dot? Do you remember the very first verse of scripture you read last month? Shit slips people's mind, get the fuck over yourself.
No, your intention is clear. You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture, all because they made them with bellybuttons. And even aside from that, you claim the notion that people have flawed understanding of the world is just "mind games." Anon, do you remember what you ate for lunch or dinner six weeks ago on the dot? Do you remember the very first verse of scripture you read last month? Shit slips people's mind, get the fuck over yourself.
File (): 2A689C2DE543C5F1FEC73C78A2B7CA8F-77171.png (75.4 KB, 1098x304, 702328.png)
>>168299
It's allowed, but you're being a massive faggot. The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
It's allowed, but you're being a massive faggot. The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
>>168300
>The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
In case you didn't get it yet.
>The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
In case you didn't get it yet.
>>168304
>The problem is your asinine attitude.
As some pony said yesterday: - It is a fucking chansite!!!!
>The problem is your asinine attitude.
As some pony said yesterday: - It is a fucking chansite!!!!
>>168305
>Deal with it hurr hurr
Chan or not, this site used to have a culture worth adhering to. People like you have shat on it time and time again. Get out.
>Deal with it hurr hurr
Chan or not, this site used to have a culture worth adhering to. People like you have shat on it time and time again. Get out.
Imagine unironically accusing western artists who defined white aesthetics of centuries to come of being satanists just because they drew a private painting of Adam and Eve with belly buttons, and not considering that that was just a careless omission, or that they were simply painted to reflect the modern individuals that they were based on.
>>168310
Dear fellow anon, for a moment let's entertain your theory and give credit to apparently human mistake.
Do you really think that the curia won't jump to correct that heresy by any means necessary?
Dear fellow anon, for a moment let's entertain your theory and give credit to apparently human mistake.
Do you really think that the curia won't jump to correct that heresy by any means necessary?
>>168311
How could they correct a private painting that sat in a Spanish guy's mansion for nearly a century after it was painted? They don't send the fucking inquisition to destroy inaccurate paintings in people's homes.
It was never a church commissioned painting, and the reality that you dared to accuse Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing that fact is infuriatingly stupid! You shouldn't just call people satanists without even doing the minimum work to research the history of the art.
How could they correct a private painting that sat in a Spanish guy's mansion for nearly a century after it was painted? They don't send the fucking inquisition to destroy inaccurate paintings in people's homes.
It was never a church commissioned painting, and the reality that you dared to accuse Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing that fact is infuriatingly stupid! You shouldn't just call people satanists without even doing the minimum work to research the history of the art.
File (): EF7C587157C412AC141FF47AEE87FDFF-381323.jpg (372.4 KB, 1480x832, 140628-giberson-fired-prof-creationism-tease_khnatq.jpeg)
File (): B202BBFB766380BE07165AE1AFDDC508-182514.jpg (178.2 KB, 1500x1047, 27260395_2090779_8f176965dd8f1f62770aed28f53a2c70_wm.jpg)
File (): E1FF7B9F581135252C220C4C3EAF3483-1184422.jpg (1.1 MB, 1832x2302, DeAdUR1VMAAlVuf.jpeg)
File (): FFBA65EFC9C8BCF7AE1904AC958CAF38-61464.jpg (60.0 KB, 960x640, adamandeve960.jpg)
File (): 209A53BE99B505EE053A6E1FA935AE3D-194662.jpg (190.1 KB, 1200x630, blog_zuma_adam_eve_apple.jpg)
>>168312
Sorry, but this not the case and the heresy is widespread across the Christian world and presented by the Church, even the Orthodox Church.
Sorry, but this not the case and the heresy is widespread across the Christian world and presented by the Church, even the Orthodox Church.
>>168313
>a private painting
There are hundreds if not thousands of paintings showing bellybuttons. This issue is official Church viewpoint.
>a private painting
There are hundreds if not thousands of paintings showing bellybuttons. This issue is official Church viewpoint.
>>168316
>But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Just to keep the record straight and smash the gaslighting.
>But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Just to keep the record straight and smash the gaslighting.
>>168314
>the freaking Stanza della Segnatura
Really? You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist? One of the greatest artists in the history of the West who helped define Christian art while preserving the conventions of Roman art was working for satan? The 'Stanza della Segnatura' was just a plot by Satan to trick people into thinking Adam and Eve weren't created, and not an ode to the beauty of mankind and the glory of god's creation? I guess we should just demolish it and replace it with pod cubicles and a bug farm then; the liberals would be glad to tear it down.
Are all white artists satanists? Is all white culture heresy?
>heresy is widespread
It sounds to me more like the idea that Adam and Eve necessarily lacked belly buttons is a fringe extrapolation not widely supported by Christians and not supported by canon scripture.
>>168317
>deflecting
As if. You know nothing of art or white culture, and your posts make it glaringly obvious.
>the freaking Stanza della Segnatura
Really? You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist? One of the greatest artists in the history of the West who helped define Christian art while preserving the conventions of Roman art was working for satan? The 'Stanza della Segnatura' was just a plot by Satan to trick people into thinking Adam and Eve weren't created, and not an ode to the beauty of mankind and the glory of god's creation? I guess we should just demolish it and replace it with pod cubicles and a bug farm then; the liberals would be glad to tear it down.
Are all white artists satanists? Is all white culture heresy?
>heresy is widespread
It sounds to me more like the idea that Adam and Eve necessarily lacked belly buttons is a fringe extrapolation not widely supported by Christians and not supported by canon scripture.
>>168317
>deflecting
As if. You know nothing of art or white culture, and your posts make it glaringly obvious.
>>168318
Just because you can ascribe ill intent to literally anything doesn't mean you should.
Fuck off already Boom Boom.
Just because you can ascribe ill intent to literally anything doesn't mean you should.
Fuck off already Boom Boom.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-394] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
394 replies | 260 files | 59 UUIDs | Page 2