/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/

Name
Email
Subject
By clicking New Reply, I acknowledge the existence of the Israeli nuclear arsenal.
Comment
0
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

1734355.png
Spiritual War as a Christian
Anonymous
5ee741d
?
No.166839
166843 166863 170203 170204 170706
Forgive them.
Now,
Command that which ails you thus:
"Go to my GOD, and to my lord Jesus Christ and pray with all thine heart, all thine mind, all thine spirit, all thine faculties, all thine body, all thine strength, all thine being, and all thine self. Pray as one ought. Pray GOD turns your heart to GOD. Pray GOD turns all you are towards GOD. Amen."
Peace be upon you.
You shall know them by their works, send them. By name, by being, by identity, by identifier, by fruit, by work, or by which you name It.
Speak/Think at It.
Send them.
Be not glad you command such, be glad your name is written in heaven.
Be glad.

Partake in the Good Word. Pray so as to talk with GOD, Jesus Christ, your guardian angel. Turn towards GOD and give everything and more.
Rejoice.
For your Wife/Husband, your children, your mother, your father, your brother, your sister may also be prayed in this way.
For Catholics they must be by Blood.
For everyone and everything else.
Do thus:
"My GOD, I ask to be in accordance with your will. I ask that my words and works are in accordance with your will. I ask what ought I do?"
Do as GOD WILLS.
-t. Anonymous. Source: in accordance.
352 replies and 246 files omitted.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168273
168274
>>168272
It's what you're implying.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168274
168276
>>168273
>implying
Sure, I imply many ugly things, but I have no access to the Vatican's archives be take a further look.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168275
168277
>>168270
These are some basic, easily refuted statements about the world. Statements that we can categorically refute and could for centuries, some of which were refuted even before the new testament was penned. Which is, again, my point. These people were fallible and wrote the scripture with their flaws in understanding in mind. Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168276
>>168274
Actually, I think the documents for how this piece was commissioned is public record. You might be able to research it in detail, although it might require travel.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168277
168278 168289
>>168275
>Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>sophistry
It is what it is. Heresy.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168278
168279
>>168277
And you are what you are: an autistic faggot.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168279
168280
>>168278
Guilty as charged. But I'm not a heretical faggot for sure.
'
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168280
168281
>>168279
If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses. There's enough retardation in the good book to do the job without any extra layers of Satanic conspiracy.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168281
168285 168289
>>168280
>If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses.
I have a theory. Satanists must tell in the people's face what they are doing, and most of the time faggots will dismiss it. It is part of their alchemy.
Anonymous
772e49a
?
No.168282
168283 168285 168288
Another thread shat by the telegram tourist.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168283
ok.gif
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Anonymous
772e49a
?
No.168284
168299
>I posted shit takes and smug ponies.
<Yay! I saved /mlpol/.com
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168285
168286
>>168281
If someone has to explain why a one inch bit of tucked-away skin is heresy, then maybe it's not in our face. If your foundational fucking text is full of inaccuracies, but it's held up as the word of God himself, then either God is misleading us, humans fallibly attributed it, or the very act of putting the books together was heresy. I like to see it in the simplest way: fallible people wrote what they thought to be true as a means of adding some credence to the simpler masses. No supernatural elements or worldwide conspiracy of a religious order against itself needed.
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Not sure who you're referring to but I don't even use telegram. Why would I? It's had data issues for years and most of its users are massive fucking creeps.
Anonymous
772e49a
?
No.168286
168287
>>168285
Not talking about U. I think it's pretty obvious.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168287
>>168286
For a tourist he sure seems to have planted his feet in this thread for quite a while. Unless there's an /mlpol/ telegram I'm unaware of.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168288
>>168282
By the way, any phonefag is a retarded faggot who the deserves every bit of the (((tech))) he uses.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168289
168290 168360
b179d419edc5526f745168c60ce5ff6c.jpg
>>168277
You're bullshitting everyone in this thread. Unironically accusing Titian of being a heretic satanist when he was a devout Christian who's work went on to inspire and define and western culture as we know it in ways that brought revolutionized art. How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
>>168281
They could literally just have rewritten the entire bible, ffs, and you think belly buttons are what they did?
I don't believe even a single person has questioned the legitimacy of the Genesis after viewing The Fall Of Man because of the freaking belly buttons.
>>168262
By the way, this particular piece wasn't even commissioned by the church. It was commissioned by Gonzalo Pérez as a private piece in his mansion: it was not made for public display, let alone some plot to subvert genesis canon. It only entered the Spanish Roya collection because it is so beautiful. You did zero research and clearly have no idea what you're talking about: you are talking out your ass. And despite not knowing the first thing about the painting, you went ahead and implicitly accused Titian of being a satanist trying to subvert Christianity by painting Adam with a belly button.

You know, I liked a couple of your posts in this thread, but the commutative baseless nonsense and this abject disrespect for white culture has caused me to lose all respect for you and your schizo ramblings. You know nothing about art, nothing about history, and your reading comprehension for scripture is dubious.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168290
168291 168297
25ec7.jpg
>>168289
>There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
No evidence needed. It is called Faith and you take it as it is.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168291
168292
>>168290
Tell me where in the bible it says that Adam and Eve lack belly buttons.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168292
168293
>>168291
Don't plays mind games. Adam and Eve were created by God. They weren't born.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168293
168294
>>168292
And God couldn't create them with belly buttons, so that they would match his omniscient vision for mankind? God gave Adam nipples: he works in mysterious ways.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168294
168295 168297
>>168293
Go on, if you keep on the slippery track soon you'll end up claiming the Adam was non-binary. /s
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168295
168296
>>168294
>claiming God made Adam with a navel because everything is in his image is the same as claiming that Adam was nonbinary
You are such a massive faggot that it's unreal.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168296
168298
>>168295
You dismissed my sarcasms mark ( /s ).
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168297
168301 168360
>>168290
Also, reply to the rest of the post, faggot. You accused Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing the context in which this painting was commissioned. You don't even know what you're talking about
>>168294
Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168298
168360
>>168296
No, your intention is clear. You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture, all because they made them with bellybuttons. And even aside from that, you claim the notion that people have flawed understanding of the world is just "mind games." Anon, do you remember what you ate for lunch or dinner six weeks ago on the dot? Do you remember the very first verse of scripture you read last month? Shit slips people's mind, get the fuck over yourself.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168299
168300
702328.png
>>168284
>smug ponies
Ponies allowed. No exceptions.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168300
168302
>>168299
It's allowed, but you're being a massive faggot. The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168301
168304
>>168297
>Slippery slope non-argument
The road to blasphemy begins with heresy.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168302
168303 168304
2328.png
>>168300
>The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
In case you didn't get it yet.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168303
>>168302
Nobody's stopping you from posting ponies, you fucking retard.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168304
168305
>>168301
Again, accusing Titian of being a heretic when he was just painting for his Spanish friend depictions of Adam and Eve based on a couple of his family members.
>>168302
It is not the fucking ponies that the problem. The problem is your asinine attitude.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168305
168306 168308
f5400.png
>>168304
>The problem is your asinine attitude.
As some pony said yesterday: - It is a fucking chansite!!!!
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168306
168307
1884536__safe_artist-colon-whiskeypanda_banned+from+derpibooru_deleted+from+derpibooru_derpibooru+import_oc_oc-colon-aryanne_ponified_unofficial+charac.png
>>168305
You get what you give.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168307
5d5b2.png
>>168306
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168308
168309
>>168305
>Deal with it hurr hurr
Chan or not, this site used to have a culture worth adhering to. People like you have shat on it time and time again. Get out.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168309
no u.png
>>168308
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168310
168311
Imagine unironically accusing western artists who defined white aesthetics of centuries to come of being satanists just because they drew a private painting of Adam and Eve with belly buttons, and not considering that that was just a careless omission, or that they were simply painted to reflect the modern individuals that they were based on.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168311
168312 168313
>>168310
Dear fellow anon, for a moment let's entertain your theory and give credit to apparently human mistake.
Do you really think that the curia won't jump to correct that heresy by any means necessary?
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168312
168314
>>168311
A privately commissioned painting not meant for public display?
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168313
168315
>>168311
How could they correct a private painting that sat in a Spanish guy's mansion for nearly a century after it was painted? They don't send the fucking inquisition to destroy inaccurate paintings in people's homes.
It was never a church commissioned painting, and the reality that you dared to accuse Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing that fact is infuriatingly stupid! You shouldn't just call people satanists without even doing the minimum work to research the history of the art.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168314
168319
140628-giberson-fired-prof-creationism-tease_khnatq.jpeg
27260395_2090779_8f176965dd8f1f62770aed28f53a2c70_wm.jpg
DeAdUR1VMAAlVuf.jpeg
adamandeve960.jpg
blog_zuma_adam_eve_apple.jpg
>>168312
Sorry, but this not the case and the heresy is widespread across the Christian world and presented by the Church, even the Orthodox Church.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168315
168316
>>168313
>a private painting
There are hundreds if not thousands of paintings showing bellybuttons. This issue is official Church viewpoint.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168316
168317 168318
>>168315
But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168317
168319
>>168316
Now you are deflecting your ignorance on me. Just accept you were wrong and move over.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168318
168320 168321 168323
0329.png
>>168316
>But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Just to keep the record straight and smash the gaslighting.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168319
168322
>>168314
>the freaking Stanza della Segnatura
Really? You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist? One of the greatest artists in the history of the West who helped define Christian art while preserving the conventions of Roman art was working for satan? The 'Stanza della Segnatura' was just a plot by Satan to trick people into thinking Adam and Eve weren't created, and not an ode to the beauty of mankind and the glory of god's creation? I guess we should just demolish it and replace it with pod cubicles and a bug farm then; the liberals would be glad to tear it down.
Are all white artists satanists? Is all white culture heresy?
>heresy is widespread
It sounds to me more like the idea that Adam and Eve necessarily lacked belly buttons is a fringe extrapolation not widely supported by Christians and not supported by canon scripture.
>>168317
>deflecting
As if. You know nothing of art or white culture, and your posts make it glaringly obvious.
Anonymous
b843fc5
?
No.168320
>>168318
Just because you can ascribe ill intent to literally anything doesn't mean you should.
Fuck off already Boom Boom.
Anonymous
0183b2d
?
No.168321
168324
>>168318
It was you who implied that that pic was commissioned by the church for Satan.
Anonymous
b3cc1b6
?
No.168322
168325 168327
>>168319
>You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist?
Not quite, but I'm sure the Church commissioning it was not holy.