Forgive them.
Now,
Command that which ails you thus:
"Go to my GOD, and to my lord Jesus Christ and pray with all thine heart, all thine mind, all thine spirit, all thine faculties, all thine body, all thine strength, all thine being, and all thine self. Pray as one ought. Pray GOD turns your heart to GOD. Pray GOD turns all you are towards GOD. Amen."
Peace be upon you.
You shall know them by their works, send them. By name, by being, by identity, by identifier, by fruit, by work, or by which you name It.
Speak/Think at It.
Send them.
Be not glad you command such, be glad your name is written in heaven.
Be glad.
Partake in the Good Word. Pray so as to talk with GOD, Jesus Christ, your guardian angel. Turn towards GOD and give everything and more.
Rejoice.
For your Wife/Husband, your children, your mother, your father, your brother, your sister may also be prayed in this way.
For Catholics they must be by Blood.
For everyone and everything else.
Do thus:
"My GOD, I ask to be in accordance with your will. I ask that my words and works are in accordance with your will. I ask what ought I do?"
Do as GOD WILLS.
-t. Anonymous. Source: in accordance.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): 31BF603AC929791D4777A8DB749697A0-238383.png (232.8 KB, 2800x1990, 1734355.png)
302 replies and 223 files omitted.
>>168273
>implying
Sure, I imply many ugly things, but I have no access to the Vatican's archives be take a further look.
>implying
Sure, I imply many ugly things, but I have no access to the Vatican's archives be take a further look.
>>168270
These are some basic, easily refuted statements about the world. Statements that we can categorically refute and could for centuries, some of which were refuted even before the new testament was penned. Which is, again, my point. These people were fallible and wrote the scripture with their flaws in understanding in mind. Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
These are some basic, easily refuted statements about the world. Statements that we can categorically refute and could for centuries, some of which were refuted even before the new testament was penned. Which is, again, my point. These people were fallible and wrote the scripture with their flaws in understanding in mind. Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>>168274
Actually, I think the documents for how this piece was commissioned is public record. You might be able to research it in detail, although it might require travel.
Actually, I think the documents for how this piece was commissioned is public record. You might be able to research it in detail, although it might require travel.
>>168275
>Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>sophistry
It is what it is. Heresy.
>Getting this twisted up about whether artists were heretics for giving the first humans bellybuttons is pure sophistry with no precedent.
>sophistry
It is what it is. Heresy.
>>168279
If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses. There's enough retardation in the good book to do the job without any extra layers of Satanic conspiracy.
If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses. There's enough retardation in the good book to do the job without any extra layers of Satanic conspiracy.
>>168280
>If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses.
I have a theory. Satanists must tell in the people's face what they are doing, and most of the time faggots will dismiss it. It is part of their alchemy.
>If it's intentional heresy then that would have to be the most pitiable way to deconvert or misinform the masses.
I have a theory. Satanists must tell in the people's face what they are doing, and most of the time faggots will dismiss it. It is part of their alchemy.
>>168281
If someone has to explain why a one inch bit of tucked-away skin is heresy, then maybe it's not in our face. If your foundational fucking text is full of inaccuracies, but it's held up as the word of God himself, then either God is misleading us, humans fallibly attributed it, or the very act of putting the books together was heresy. I like to see it in the simplest way: fallible people wrote what they thought to be true as a means of adding some credence to the simpler masses. No supernatural elements or worldwide conspiracy of a religious order against itself needed.
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Not sure who you're referring to but I don't even use telegram. Why would I? It's had data issues for years and most of its users are massive fucking creeps.
If someone has to explain why a one inch bit of tucked-away skin is heresy, then maybe it's not in our face. If your foundational fucking text is full of inaccuracies, but it's held up as the word of God himself, then either God is misleading us, humans fallibly attributed it, or the very act of putting the books together was heresy. I like to see it in the simplest way: fallible people wrote what they thought to be true as a means of adding some credence to the simpler masses. No supernatural elements or worldwide conspiracy of a religious order against itself needed.
>>168282
>telegram tourist
Not sure who you're referring to but I don't even use telegram. Why would I? It's had data issues for years and most of its users are massive fucking creeps.
>>168286
For a tourist he sure seems to have planted his feet in this thread for quite a while. Unless there's an /mlpol/ telegram I'm unaware of.
For a tourist he sure seems to have planted his feet in this thread for quite a while. Unless there's an /mlpol/ telegram I'm unaware of.
>>168282
By the way, any phonefag is a retarded faggot who the deserves every bit of the (((tech))) he uses.
By the way, any phonefag is a retarded faggot who the deserves every bit of the (((tech))) he uses.
File (): 1C4E4A2B11BE7F818FADA7C5AB09FC36-40441.jpg (39.5 KB, 757x788, b179d419edc5526f745168c60ce5ff6c.jpg)
>>168277
You're bullshitting everyone in this thread. Unironically accusing Titian of being a heretic satanist when he was a devout Christian who's work went on to inspire and define and western culture as we know it in ways that brought revolutionized art. How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
>>168281
They could literally just have rewritten the entire bible, ffs, and you think belly buttons are what they did?
I don't believe even a single person has questioned the legitimacy of the Genesis after viewing The Fall Of Man because of the freaking belly buttons.
>>168262
By the way, this particular piece wasn't even commissioned by the church. It was commissioned by Gonzalo Pérez as a private piece in his mansion: it was not made for public display, let alone some plot to subvert genesis canon. It only entered the Spanish Roya collection because it is so beautiful. You did zero research and clearly have no idea what you're talking about: you are talking out your ass. And despite not knowing the first thing about the painting, you went ahead and implicitly accused Titian of being a satanist trying to subvert Christianity by painting Adam with a belly button.
You know, I liked a couple of your posts in this thread, but the commutative baseless nonsense and this abject disrespect for white culture has caused me to lose all respect for you and your schizo ramblings. You know nothing about art, nothing about history, and your reading comprehension for scripture is dubious.
You're bullshitting everyone in this thread. Unironically accusing Titian of being a heretic satanist when he was a devout Christian who's work went on to inspire and define and western culture as we know it in ways that brought revolutionized art. How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
>>168281
They could literally just have rewritten the entire bible, ffs, and you think belly buttons are what they did?
I don't believe even a single person has questioned the legitimacy of the Genesis after viewing The Fall Of Man because of the freaking belly buttons.
>>168262
By the way, this particular piece wasn't even commissioned by the church. It was commissioned by Gonzalo Pérez as a private piece in his mansion: it was not made for public display, let alone some plot to subvert genesis canon. It only entered the Spanish Roya collection because it is so beautiful. You did zero research and clearly have no idea what you're talking about: you are talking out your ass. And despite not knowing the first thing about the painting, you went ahead and implicitly accused Titian of being a satanist trying to subvert Christianity by painting Adam with a belly button.
You know, I liked a couple of your posts in this thread, but the commutative baseless nonsense and this abject disrespect for white culture has caused me to lose all respect for you and your schizo ramblings. You know nothing about art, nothing about history, and your reading comprehension for scripture is dubious.
>>168289
>There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
No evidence needed. It is called Faith and you take it as it is.
>There is zero precedent for any standard of how Adam and Eve need to be depicted, let alone that they necessarily lack bellybuttons. That is an imaginary fanon that you made up based on extrapolation with zero canon evidence.
No evidence needed. It is called Faith and you take it as it is.
>>168292
And God couldn't create them with belly buttons, so that they would match his omniscient vision for mankind? God gave Adam nipples: he works in mysterious ways.
And God couldn't create them with belly buttons, so that they would match his omniscient vision for mankind? God gave Adam nipples: he works in mysterious ways.
>>168293
Go on, if you keep on the slippery track soon you'll end up claiming the Adam was non-binary. /s
Go on, if you keep on the slippery track soon you'll end up claiming the Adam was non-binary. /s
>>168294
>claiming God made Adam with a navel because everything is in his image is the same as claiming that Adam was nonbinary
You are such a massive faggot that it's unreal.
>claiming God made Adam with a navel because everything is in his image is the same as claiming that Adam was nonbinary
You are such a massive faggot that it's unreal.
>>168290
Also, reply to the rest of the post, faggot. You accused Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing the context in which this painting was commissioned. You don't even know what you're talking about
>>168294
Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
Also, reply to the rest of the post, faggot. You accused Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing the context in which this painting was commissioned. You don't even know what you're talking about
>>168294
Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
>>168296
No, your intention is clear. You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture, all because they made them with bellybuttons. And even aside from that, you claim the notion that people have flawed understanding of the world is just "mind games." Anon, do you remember what you ate for lunch or dinner six weeks ago on the dot? Do you remember the very first verse of scripture you read last month? Shit slips people's mind, get the fuck over yourself.
No, your intention is clear. You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture, all because they made them with bellybuttons. And even aside from that, you claim the notion that people have flawed understanding of the world is just "mind games." Anon, do you remember what you ate for lunch or dinner six weeks ago on the dot? Do you remember the very first verse of scripture you read last month? Shit slips people's mind, get the fuck over yourself.
File (): 2A689C2DE543C5F1FEC73C78A2B7CA8F-77171.png (75.4 KB, 1098x304, 702328.png)
>>168299
It's allowed, but you're being a massive faggot. The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
It's allowed, but you're being a massive faggot. The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
>>168300
>The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
In case you didn't get it yet.
>The fact most of your pictures related to ponies are just smug reaction images doesn't help things.
In case you didn't get it yet.
>>168304
>The problem is your asinine attitude.
As some pony said yesterday: - It is a fucking chansite!!!!
>The problem is your asinine attitude.
As some pony said yesterday: - It is a fucking chansite!!!!
>>168305
>Deal with it hurr hurr
Chan or not, this site used to have a culture worth adhering to. People like you have shat on it time and time again. Get out.
>Deal with it hurr hurr
Chan or not, this site used to have a culture worth adhering to. People like you have shat on it time and time again. Get out.
Imagine unironically accusing western artists who defined white aesthetics of centuries to come of being satanists just because they drew a private painting of Adam and Eve with belly buttons, and not considering that that was just a careless omission, or that they were simply painted to reflect the modern individuals that they were based on.
>>168310
Dear fellow anon, for a moment let's entertain your theory and give credit to apparently human mistake.
Do you really think that the curia won't jump to correct that heresy by any means necessary?
Dear fellow anon, for a moment let's entertain your theory and give credit to apparently human mistake.
Do you really think that the curia won't jump to correct that heresy by any means necessary?
>>168311
How could they correct a private painting that sat in a Spanish guy's mansion for nearly a century after it was painted? They don't send the fucking inquisition to destroy inaccurate paintings in people's homes.
It was never a church commissioned painting, and the reality that you dared to accuse Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing that fact is infuriatingly stupid! You shouldn't just call people satanists without even doing the minimum work to research the history of the art.
How could they correct a private painting that sat in a Spanish guy's mansion for nearly a century after it was painted? They don't send the fucking inquisition to destroy inaccurate paintings in people's homes.
It was never a church commissioned painting, and the reality that you dared to accuse Titian of being a Satanist without even knowing that fact is infuriatingly stupid! You shouldn't just call people satanists without even doing the minimum work to research the history of the art.
File (): EF7C587157C412AC141FF47AEE87FDFF-381323.jpg (372.4 KB, 1480x832, 140628-giberson-fired-prof-creationism-tease_khnatq.jpeg)
File (): B202BBFB766380BE07165AE1AFDDC508-182514.jpg (178.2 KB, 1500x1047, 27260395_2090779_8f176965dd8f1f62770aed28f53a2c70_wm.jpg)
File (): E1FF7B9F581135252C220C4C3EAF3483-1184422.jpg (1.1 MB, 1832x2302, DeAdUR1VMAAlVuf.jpeg)
File (): FFBA65EFC9C8BCF7AE1904AC958CAF38-61464.jpg (60.0 KB, 960x640, adamandeve960.jpg)
File (): 209A53BE99B505EE053A6E1FA935AE3D-194662.jpg (190.1 KB, 1200x630, blog_zuma_adam_eve_apple.jpg)
>>168312
Sorry, but this not the case and the heresy is widespread across the Christian world and presented by the Church, even the Orthodox Church.
Sorry, but this not the case and the heresy is widespread across the Christian world and presented by the Church, even the Orthodox Church.
>>168313
>a private painting
There are hundreds if not thousands of paintings showing bellybuttons. This issue is official Church viewpoint.
>a private painting
There are hundreds if not thousands of paintings showing bellybuttons. This issue is official Church viewpoint.
>>168316
>But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Just to keep the record straight and smash the gaslighting.
>But the one you posted wasn't: you demonstrably do not know what you are talking about.
Just to keep the record straight and smash the gaslighting.
>>168314
>the freaking Stanza della Segnatura
Really? You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist? One of the greatest artists in the history of the West who helped define Christian art while preserving the conventions of Roman art was working for satan? The 'Stanza della Segnatura' was just a plot by Satan to trick people into thinking Adam and Eve weren't created, and not an ode to the beauty of mankind and the glory of god's creation? I guess we should just demolish it and replace it with pod cubicles and a bug farm then; the liberals would be glad to tear it down.
Are all white artists satanists? Is all white culture heresy?
>heresy is widespread
It sounds to me more like the idea that Adam and Eve necessarily lacked belly buttons is a fringe extrapolation not widely supported by Christians and not supported by canon scripture.
>>168317
>deflecting
As if. You know nothing of art or white culture, and your posts make it glaringly obvious.
>the freaking Stanza della Segnatura
Really? You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist? One of the greatest artists in the history of the West who helped define Christian art while preserving the conventions of Roman art was working for satan? The 'Stanza della Segnatura' was just a plot by Satan to trick people into thinking Adam and Eve weren't created, and not an ode to the beauty of mankind and the glory of god's creation? I guess we should just demolish it and replace it with pod cubicles and a bug farm then; the liberals would be glad to tear it down.
Are all white artists satanists? Is all white culture heresy?
>heresy is widespread
It sounds to me more like the idea that Adam and Eve necessarily lacked belly buttons is a fringe extrapolation not widely supported by Christians and not supported by canon scripture.
>>168317
>deflecting
As if. You know nothing of art or white culture, and your posts make it glaringly obvious.
>>168318
Just because you can ascribe ill intent to literally anything doesn't mean you should.
Fuck off already Boom Boom.
Just because you can ascribe ill intent to literally anything doesn't mean you should.
Fuck off already Boom Boom.
>>168319
>You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist?
Not quite, but I'm sure the Church commissioning it was not holy.
>You're accusing Raphael of being a Satanist?
Not quite, but I'm sure the Church commissioning it was not holy.
>>168318
>taking a screencap of a post in this very thread
>arrows as if we could already see it
It's literally right in front of us. You don't need to do that. Not everyone is retarded as you.
>taking a screencap of a post in this very thread
>arrows as if we could already see it
It's literally right in front of us. You don't need to do that. Not everyone is retarded as you.
>>168321
>It was you who implied that that pic was commissioned by the church for Satan.
C'mon, not the satan's church, but indeed an unholy one.
>It was you who implied that that pic was commissioned by the church for Satan.
C'mon, not the satan's church, but indeed an unholy one.
>>168323
>You don't need to do that.
Yes I do as (you) felt free to assume that it was just a private painting not for public display.
>You don't need to do that.
Yes I do as (you) felt free to assume that it was just a private painting not for public display.
>>168322
I'm sooo convinced that people went to the Stanza della Segnatura and came out less Christian than they went in just because they saw Adam and Eve with belly buttons. They totally fell into Satans grasp from those heretical belly buttons, and weren't in at all inspired to greater faith by the beauty of the art.
I'm sooo convinced that people went to the Stanza della Segnatura and came out less Christian than they went in just because they saw Adam and Eve with belly buttons. They totally fell into Satans grasp from those heretical belly buttons, and weren't in at all inspired to greater faith by the beauty of the art.
>>168329
No it doesn't. There was zero context for it. The meme is dripping with irony, and you took it seriously anyway.
No it doesn't. There was zero context for it. The meme is dripping with irony, and you took it seriously anyway.
>>168327
>I'm sooo convinced that people went to the Stanza della Segnatura and came out less Christian than they went in just because they saw Adam and Eve with belly buttons.
I doubt it. Normies will eat anything thrown to them when told it is something famous and very valuable.
>I'm sooo convinced that people went to the Stanza della Segnatura and came out less Christian than they went in just because they saw Adam and Eve with belly buttons.
I doubt it. Normies will eat anything thrown to them when told it is something famous and very valuable.
File (): 46965F718EF404AA1C1C5A13FB3DC679-1081423.png (1.0 MB, 1065x1000, 930121ee89fc22e5f0373d29ff49f1b5_8452322546543054934.jpg)
It's literally impossible to have a discussion with this nigger. Am not sure why he isn't treated as a shill at this point. He's like an advanced Zald or some shit.
File (): 5853115412FAC26B820E0B7C06557904-111546.png (108.9 KB, 261x390, AI generated filly tummy.png)
>>168329
The image told us to stare at the bellybutton and ponder it. Something I'm sure I could do without looking at those heretical Genesis portrayals :^)
The image told us to stare at the bellybutton and ponder it. Something I'm sure I could do without looking at those heretical Genesis portrayals :^)
>>168324
Unholy because the monk in charge of art commissioning who had probably never seen a naked woman in his life, let alone understand the anatomy behind the umbilical cord in an era where anatomy wasn't well known (except to midwives), did not think to take initiative to specify that Adam and Eve shouldn't have belly buttons: a thing not even explicitly defined in scripture.
Ffs, the church was full of shit in hundreds of ways, but buying art with belly buttons is not one of them. Why don't you talk about the sale of indulgences or something else that actually contributed to the erosion of Christian society, ffs.
Unholy because the monk in charge of art commissioning who had probably never seen a naked woman in his life, let alone understand the anatomy behind the umbilical cord in an era where anatomy wasn't well known (except to midwives), did not think to take initiative to specify that Adam and Eve shouldn't have belly buttons: a thing not even explicitly defined in scripture.
Ffs, the church was full of shit in hundreds of ways, but buying art with belly buttons is not one of them. Why don't you talk about the sale of indulgences or something else that actually contributed to the erosion of Christian society, ffs.
>>168333
>The image told us to stare at the bellybutton and ponder it
Dude, if you are not able to realize what it is about, then I may conclude you are may be, perhaps, a synthetic human.
>The image told us to stare at the bellybutton and ponder it
Dude, if you are not able to realize what it is about, then I may conclude you are may be, perhaps, a synthetic human.
>>168334
>Unholy because the monk in charge of art commissioning who had probably never seen a naked woman in his life
You are missing the whole conversation, this is not an isolated case, it is official Church depiction around the world.
>Unholy because the monk in charge of art commissioning who had probably never seen a naked woman in his life
You are missing the whole conversation, this is not an isolated case, it is official Church depiction around the world.
File (): 8EE36E563A9FFB30D8ED8A7F60FBC819-65535.jpg (64.0 KB, 1039x538, 048E51A83244A9EE66E7CC8432D23E3D-65517.jpg)
I step away for however long and it's gone to shit.
Paintings could technically invoke spiritual stuff like music and stuff.
But fucking painting a belly button is the hilll you stand on?
>>168329
This thread is about the SPIRITUAL WARFARE.
There are pieces that do shit to specific people in specific ways.
Please knock it off.
>>168335
Read these posts.
Paintings could technically invoke spiritual stuff like music and stuff.
But fucking painting a belly button is the hilll you stand on?
>>168329
This thread is about the SPIRITUAL WARFARE.
There are pieces that do shit to specific people in specific ways.
Please knock it off.
>>168335
Read these posts.
>>168343
>anyone who disagrees with anything I say is gaslighting, a communist, a Satanist, a globalist, trying to kill the site...
>anyone who disagrees with anything I say is gaslighting, a communist, a Satanist, a globalist, trying to kill the site...
>>168338
Why don't you write a letter to the Vatican and ask them to correct it? See if you get a response. You might get a colorful reply if you demonstrate knowledge of historical context and appreciation for the art and culture behind it.
They've edited other artworks they own before. They recently edited The Last Supper to make the food look slightly bigger so that it would look like a feast to a modern audience. Write to them and make the case for why they should paint over all of the belly buttons.
Why don't you write a letter to the Vatican and ask them to correct it? See if you get a response. You might get a colorful reply if you demonstrate knowledge of historical context and appreciation for the art and culture behind it.
They've edited other artworks they own before. They recently edited The Last Supper to make the food look slightly bigger so that it would look like a feast to a modern audience. Write to them and make the case for why they should paint over all of the belly buttons.
>>168343
You don't even know what that word means, lol.
I'm not "gaslighting". I'm just mocking you and expressing scorn for your niggerdry. Know the difference.
You don't even know what that word means, lol.
I'm not "gaslighting". I'm just mocking you and expressing scorn for your niggerdry. Know the difference.
Sorry about that, it's been quite frustrating realizing I can't communicate with people.
>>168343
Posts per hour and user engagement is not the same as shitting up threads pretending to be retarded for (You)s.
>>168343
Posts per hour and user engagement is not the same as shitting up threads pretending to be retarded for (You)s.
>>168348
>b-b-but look at all these UUIDs! I totally didn't create them by hopping around my networks while being a massive sore thumb on the site, if I left the site would be dead!
>b-b-but look at all these UUIDs! I totally didn't create them by hopping around my networks while being a massive sore thumb on the site, if I left the site would be dead!
>Anon gets mogged in an argument and exposes himself as an uncultured swine with no appreciation for white culture
>makes excuse to leave, hoping people will forget by the next time he posts in this thread
Many such cases.
>makes excuse to leave, hoping people will forget by the next time he posts in this thread
Many such cases.
File (): 1CAAC011B0F3FAED1B9FC9B6CD6661E2-1119320.jpg (1.1 MB, 1280x800, 1557366651422.jpeg)
File (): DA15C922F5C004BBF1B6E54E39DA1449-6852592.png (6.5 MB, 3508x2480, DA15C922F5C004BBF1B6E54E39DA1449-6852592.png)
File (): A549B3CDF408999BFEA6BA7133934A8F-353486.png (345.2 KB, 500x500, A549B3CDF408999BFEA6BA7133934A8F-353486.png)
File (): C93A0CD866CA5094D878908843C4A773-369444.png (360.8 KB, 681x1029, adoryanne.png)
>>168289
>How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
>>168297
>Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
>>168298
>You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture
Irony of ironies.
FYI, I am OP of the Aesthetic thread.
What a bunch of asinine faggots. What a disappointing moment.
>How despicable of you to show such asinine disrespect for white culture.
>>168297
>Slippery slope non-argument that doesn't excuse accusing culture-defining white artists of being satanists.
>>168298
>You resent a bunch of artists hoping to capture the beauty of the human form and the emotional resonance of an essential piece of white aesthetic/culture
Irony of ironies.
FYI, I am OP of the Aesthetic thread.
What a bunch of asinine faggots. What a disappointing moment.
>>168360
So it's not resentment of white aesthetics, when you call something anti-God and heretical. Okay bud.
So it's not resentment of white aesthetics, when you call something anti-God and heretical. Okay bud.
>>168360
Why are you even a Christian if literally all depictions of biblical events are heretical or subversive? Wouldn't literally all media related to Christianity be bad to allow into your oh-so-well-guarded heart?
Why are you even a Christian if literally all depictions of biblical events are heretical or subversive? Wouldn't literally all media related to Christianity be bad to allow into your oh-so-well-guarded heart?
>>168360
>FYI, I am OP of the Aesthetic thread
And yet you show a shallow disrespect for the arts. How shameful.
>hurr durr, I made a thread, that absolves me of my feats of unspeakable ignorance
>FYI, I am OP of the Aesthetic thread
And yet you show a shallow disrespect for the arts. How shameful.
>hurr durr, I made a thread, that absolves me of my feats of unspeakable ignorance
>>168362
He hasn't even presented any images of Adam and Eve without belly buttons. By his standards, non-satanic Christian art doesn't exist.
He hasn't even presented any images of Adam and Eve without belly buttons. By his standards, non-satanic Christian art doesn't exist.
File (): 826DD77176BA354BD9A9410DEA73A5FD-984519.png (961.4 KB, 1600x900, 1264328.png)
File (): 3842204F85C5C0A6CA3F9B4742C6BD43-22335.jpg (21.8 KB, 280x280, 6597566.jpg)
The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with (You) all. Amen.
File (): D66BA17C2432901CDC9BF6D29C061F08-47646.jpg (46.5 KB, 540x540, god8d2c.jpg)
>>168433
It's more like
>I've prayed my entire life and there has not been any sign of reaction from anyone except myself
>Oh yeah? Maybe you just disbelieve because you hate God because your mom died of cancer, checkmate straw-atheist
It's more like
>I've prayed my entire life and there has not been any sign of reaction from anyone except myself
>Oh yeah? Maybe you just disbelieve because you hate God because your mom died of cancer, checkmate straw-atheist
File (): 3D71748962B5BD3870D6510A8C95027E-37176.jpg (36.3 KB, 768x699, 1000001300-768x699.jpg)
File (): 0DA09CAB5BEFCAA5B75C4B2ABDB6BBD0-114441.jpg (111.8 KB, 590x324, 1565156790820.jpg)
Isn't a fire in a glass sea like hot water or water varpor.
And water rises when hot enough and salts tend to stay behind more or less.
Water can't hang onto salt due to the heat.
And water rises when hot enough and salts tend to stay behind more or less.
Water can't hang onto salt due to the heat.
File (): C502343F291B6888CD9D5ED398EAA98C-386705.png (377.6 KB, 891x894, yes 90.png)
File (): 69992E25E4368F6DA02BDEB3A0354030-441077.png (430.7 KB, 1658x792, AndwSMQ.png)
File (): 449297ED75195DBC5C1847E1AB99F5BA-862351.jpg (842.1 KB, 1200x5653, 674620.jpg)
File (): 1D44557709BECE570C0E191EA83C72FA-102079.jpg (99.7 KB, 675x645, 1542628674560.jpg)
File (): 3B05AA2A9C8E58EFC4F4B206979884DE-250016.png (244.2 KB, 806x371, panzerkampfwagen shaedinfreude.PNG)
File (): DCE7B1BFE234D471E06A767D52206663-496744.png (485.1 KB, 433x853, 1566238625114.png)
>>168457
The court for gentiles is the only place travellers could go to get close to God. What happens is a case of jewery as inside the holy area jews peddle their wares and try to make it a market place instead. It's so egregious walking in is nearly impossible making the whole trip almost worthless.
Like a jew convention center where jews jew.
Now if someone were to upend just a few tables the jew on jew kvetching on how much is who's would sour them entirely from doing it again...
>>168433
You need to be more spicy. That take misses a key point.
Addressed in that post below.
>>168434
Also people who are alive in Christ are either hot and or cold. Hot as in Hot Caoco and Cold as in icecream float.
But also about being just barely drinkable so it's not gut and tongue wrenchingly awful.
But it's also possible to be one or the other or both and have it spread somehow.
Something something point
Many 'self proclaimed' Christians aren't so neighborly and so are others aren't so neighborly either.
Praying is alot like playing make believe as children with a good parental figure(s). The parent doing the cool whatever it is.
Like making a sammich.
If the kid starts genuinely thinking the parent isn't doing anything and is instead because of the mystical bathroom tile.
When a kid speaks where only the kid can see/hear the parent and opens up about all sorts of stuff including what is wanted and more. Then when it's fulfilled and the journey the interpersonal bond gets a little bit closer
The court for gentiles is the only place travellers could go to get close to God. What happens is a case of jewery as inside the holy area jews peddle their wares and try to make it a market place instead. It's so egregious walking in is nearly impossible making the whole trip almost worthless.
Like a jew convention center where jews jew.
Now if someone were to upend just a few tables the jew on jew kvetching on how much is who's would sour them entirely from doing it again...
>>168433
You need to be more spicy. That take misses a key point.
Addressed in that post below.
>>168434
Also people who are alive in Christ are either hot and or cold. Hot as in Hot Caoco and Cold as in icecream float.
But also about being just barely drinkable so it's not gut and tongue wrenchingly awful.
But it's also possible to be one or the other or both and have it spread somehow.
Something something point
Many 'self proclaimed' Christians aren't so neighborly and so are others aren't so neighborly either.
Praying is alot like playing make believe as children with a good parental figure(s). The parent doing the cool whatever it is.
Like making a sammich.
If the kid starts genuinely thinking the parent isn't doing anything and is instead because of the mystical bathroom tile.
When a kid speaks where only the kid can see/hear the parent and opens up about all sorts of stuff including what is wanted and more. Then when it's fulfilled and the journey the interpersonal bond gets a little bit closer
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-300] [301-400] [401-402] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
402 replies | 262 files | 64 UUIDs | Page 3