/ub/ - Überhengst

>dodging the question
I've told you repeatedly that I was just treating the subject matter with the level of seriousness it deserved; none whatsoever. That's why I made that silly post that caused you to sperg and bring up Nigel.
>How is my joke comparable to your 'joke' of shoving ants up your dick?
They're comparable because both are stupid, absurd jokes. Mine just happened to be sillier and funnier, given the reaction it elicited. Do you want me to debate you on the semantics of humor? Comparing ant bites to rape is silly and forcing ants down one's cock to blast minorities with is just a few steps more absurd.
>doing his damndest to avoid acknowledging that you may have jumped the gun, or that your interest in coming after me
I didn't wander in here with the explicit intention of "coming after you". It's just that your posting style and passionate love of Nigel stand out. This isn't some weird autistic grudge playing out over ant rape and cumming ants at niggers.
>Citation
Don't be coy. You do this all the time and anyone who's been here for any amount of time has seen it. I'm not the first one to point this out.
>Is that a tacit admission that I WAS right, that he was precisely where I said he would be?
I didn't enter this whole ordeal until I made that joke that you accused him of making. My post had nothing to do with him and we wouldn't even be talking about him if you didn't feel the need to bring him up.
>get me for SOMETHING at LAST
...And I would have gotten away with it, too! If only it wasn't for your clever wit and, presumably, smouldering good looks that totally pwnd me! Get real kek there's petty and then there's whatever this is.
>And. Im. Right. 99%. Of. The. Time.
You are, but you constantly agonizing over Niggel is almost as annoying as his posts. He's easily ignored. Tongue my anus, nigger.

>>5422
>moving goalposts
Pottery
>I didnt wander in here with the explicit intention [...] its that your posting style
So, implicit then? 2nd degree intent?
>Dont be coy
No u. Cite an example, and Ill illustrate how you're misphrasing or misframing it to appear to have a leg to stand on. Ill gladly speak to every post Ive made, and destroy your posturing in the process.
>you brought him up
Speculation in absence of evidence. I could speculate that this whole thing could have been avoided if you hadnt decided to make a ridiculous and off the wall 'parody' of the joke. Which unlike your position bears out with evidence. Unlike you however, I know that speculation is spurious and immaterial, so I dont. Youll get the memo eventually.
>whatever this is
You really should ask yourself, if you havent figured it out yet. Not that you have shown the reasoning ability, but Im an optimist so I say go for it.
>Yiu are r8ght
Very GOOD! You're making progress! Now, since you've been "paying attention", can you tell the class WHY I do so?
(Yes, that was an invitation. What will you choose? Intellectual honesty, or more pithy insults and characterizations that illustrate YOU, no matter how hard you try to assert that its 'me'?)
>jeopardy music playing
https://youtu.be/Yuu2_ATAY1w
>funnier

>>5423
>moving goalposts
Pot meet kettle.
My point is that you're just as annoying as Nigel, even when you rightfully shit on him. Funny that you accuse me of moving the goalpost when you dance around every point like a nigger that just got its food stamps. I don't care if you're right about his posts because yours are just as annoying. No, I'm not slogging through every thread marked by your presence and assembling evidence that your nubs are behind those posts just to prove a point that everyone here already knows.
>can you tell the class WHY I do so?
Because bitching about Niggel shitting up threads while you do the same seems to be your past time, which is gay.

>>5424
>as annoying as Nigel
>yours are just as annoying
>annoying 2x
Boy, couldnt wait to get that out could ya?
Oh wait, this is serious.
Oh no, are you saying you dont LIKE me? After all we've been through?
Credit for your halfhearted honesty though. The real crux is simply that; you dont like me, recognized my posts, and decided to try and give me what for. Howd that work out for ya?
I trust you'll be quick to go back and acknowledge all the posturing and deflection you were just doing? No?
>point that everyone here already knows
You mean that 'if Nigel can smear shit across the board/thread then I will do likewise, and if you dont like it, maybe he shouldnt be smearing shit across the board/thread'?

>>5425
This getting less amusing and more tedious as it goes on. You have the coherence of a babbling mental patient. I'm getting tired of trying to hammer the simple points into your head only to have you try to shift to conversation.
> The real crux is simply that; you dont like me, recognized my posts, and decided to try and give me what for
I don't think anyone likes you, dip shit. The only reason you and Nigel are tolerated is because this site is a dead meme that the moderation just doesn't want to put down by hammering retards like you two. Throw another one of your hissy fits and threaten to stop posting news articles. See who cares.
>and if you dont like it, maybe he shouldnt be smearing shit across the board/thread'?
Yes, because I'm responsible for the behavior of others. You think like a fucking paranoid woman. I can see how you were too incompetent to even be a moderator on a Mongolian basket weaving forum.
What I like has no bearing on either you or niggel shitting everything up. I'm honestly starting to think you're so combative and unfunny because you enjoy the attention that you get from other anons so much that just can't help yourself. I should know better than to engage you, yet you always find a new lowly way to be insufferable.
Go ahead and tik out another schizophrenic reply with your stumps, retard. I'm going to start treating you with the same level of respect you deserve. I'd make you my Nigel until you either stop posting, cut off too many fingers to post, or stop being so unbearably obtuse and retarded, but you'd probably just feed off the attention. I'll keep giving it to you until you finally get bored and fuck off.

>>5426
Thats the difference between us. For me this has been tedious since the beginning, yet you still cant admit you made a mistake. Spin things however makes you happy, your reasoning ability is on full display. If I seem incoherent, I must apologize for using a post 3rd grade writing style, it takes skill and nuance to grasp my prose. Im sure youll get there someday, I believe in you.
Seriously, you decided to make a stand cuz you didnt like a joke. Who's behaving like a woman? And yet you still expect me to take as credible anything you say? What's more, observe our demeanor. Ive asked you to validate all of your snark, all of your salt, whereas you have opted to throw out names, characterizations, and contempt from the very beginning. Cuz you didnt like my joke. Its plainly obvious who is bent, and who is defending themselves against an unreasonable imposition.
Go ahead! Call what Im doing a "hissy fit" or "sperging" or "half a dozen rants". Keep saying it; eventually, like a leftist you'll believe your own lies.
>Yes, because I'm responsible for the behavior of others.
Now apply that thinking. You really think you're going to change my behavior, while insisting that someone else's behavior isnt your responsibility? You seem divided in your own mind, alas you cant have it both ways.
>I should know better than to engage you
Thats the most astute thing you've said this whole exchange. Let me reiterate more simply.
Dont start none, wont be none
>Im going to start treating you with the respect you deserve
Oh, youve been respectful thus far? Curious.
>unbearably obtuse and retarded
Psychological transference is a bitch, good luck with that.

Since this is something of an advice thread, let me offer some.
>We criticize in others what we see in ourself
What this means is, every criticism, epithet, and slur you fling isnt directed at me, its directed at the 'me' you perceive, which is actually a reflection of yourself.
For the record, this is why I avoid needless insults; anything I could say (read: everything you've said) is a double-edged sword that cuts you far deeper than me, since your are vastly more familiar with you than you are with me.
I lost you again didn't I?
The simple version is, I know your taunts are spurious and based on a false impression, and that you're actually railing against your own perceived inadequacy.
First off, you're not inadequate, stop thinking that. Secondly, you should try arguing in good faith. Do you really think Im gonna be bothered by info I deliberately released to the site? C'mon man.
Everybody makes mistakes, and the ability to own up to them is a GOOD thing. You gotta laugh at yourself sometimes. And when you do, you'll be as unmoved by attempts to fling your mistakes in your face as I am.

>>5427
>yet you still cant admit you made a mistake.
Weapons grade projection.
>for using a post 3rd grade writing style
That's an insult to third graders.
>Seriously, you decided to make a stand cuz you didnt like a joke.
Literally you throughout this thread.
>Ive asked you to validate all of your snark, all of your salt, whereas you have opted to throw out names, characterizations, and contempt from the very beginning.
We're arguing over a joke about cumming ants onto niggers that offended you so much you felt the need for all this. You have done absolutely nothing but be obtuse and pedantic as I half-heartedly engaged you. I've done nothing but be patient and have tolerated your noxious behavior, largely because the whole scenario amused me. By the way, the entire argument is over a subjective matter of comedic taste. How that's beyond you is puzzling. I made my point clear repeatedly, yet you just keep spewing out diversions and regurgitating the same rhetoric like a broken toy.
>You really think you're going to change my behavior, while insisting that someone else's behavior isnt your responsibility?
Again, we get more of your usual, nonsensical claptrap. How are either of these things contradictory? You argue like you're demented. Just sit and read what you just wrote.
You aren't my responsibility no matter how affected you are by my posts. There's your dose of >"spoon-feeding".

>>5429
>No u
Classic

>shitting up the Wisdoms thread
For shame.

>>5431
Not my intention, and I accept fault for not taking it to the pub.

>>5431
This.

>>5431
>>5433
Are y'all gonna beat a dead hoers, or are ya gonna post wisdoms to counteract? Be the change.

>>5434
It's fine poner. I was just shitposting.

You gotta do the work
https://youtu.be/tJVAsZQrLR0

You're no "Free Thinker" if you only think what Paid "Thinkers" tell you to.

>>5737
Yup. And they are free thinkers because the TV told them so.

https://youtu.be/gh87OVCYY_g
Introversion explained by an introvert

https://youtu.be/Z11ygYzcDQw
Excerpted from one of Jordan Peterson's lectures in a series
OP, I recognize that these posts do not exactly align with the posted intent of this thread; if desired I will desist.

WHY MEN ARE SELDOM DEPRESSED.
https://johndenugent.com/us-army-medical-officer-whistleblower-pentagon-is-alterering-data-to-cover-up-massive-vaxx-injuries-humor-about-men/

Never give up.

>Always Listen To Your Gut Instinct - (4:40 Long)
>There are things you instinctually know long before your head has figured it out. Lana talks about the importance of listening to your gut instinct. Your gut doesn't lie but people do.
https://odysee.com/@redicetv:1/RITV-TrustYourGut:7
Mirrors:
https://tv.gab.com/channel/redicetv/view/always-listen-to-your-gut-instinct-631116d9023df567c65c1808
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FT3FDtgfuSNU/

Exclusively posting nonsense when replying to obvious bots might fuck with them and pollute the data they use.

>>5986
Perhaps, but it might encourage more bot posting if their use is based on number of replays.

>>5988
Who would run a bot on numerous sites at once and determine which sites are worth running that bot on based on replys?

>>5989
A contractor working for the glowniggers who needs to justify the paycheck.

>>5990
If a JIDF shill got hundreds of comments mocking him he'd still get paid, taking money away from the jews, right?

>>5986
Only if you sage.