/ub/ - Überhengst

Re-posted from >>>/mlpol/341579 →

Bleach and ammonia make a really good cleaning solution, especially for removing grime in bathrooms. Not to mention it smells great. I love to take a big huff of the stuff.

If there's one thing I've learned from getting raped (read: they climb onto me, stick their what's-it in, deposit a 'fluid' and then die curled up on themselves) by ants, its that no matter how collossal one's adversary, you can still get off, and make them feel pain and regret your existence.
In a manner, you can make the Gods regret having crossed paths with you.

Conversely, you could not. I dunno how many ants have peacefully made and went.
But those rapist motherfuckers, I rember them.

>>5402
What the fuck? How small are you?
Did an ant hump your shoe or something? An ant is the size of an ant. Is this some furry self insert fanfiction? How did you even detect what the ant was doing with its cock? Is ant fluid even noticeable to the human eye? I could understand if a dog humped your leg and the owner took so long to drag the dog away you considered kicking them both. But a fucking ant? Why wouldn't you slap the ant and crush it to death the second you detected it?

>>5403
Silly me, I neglected to appreciate how excited you might get by the sound of the phrase 'raped by ants'. It was a play on words, making light of how ants operate by stinging anything that moves in their vicinity.
It was a casual choice of words that one assumes wouldn't be taken literally, but I can see now how you might feel robbed by the instance not literally involving a bunch of ant penises. It was not my intention to get your hopes up unwarranted.

>>5402
>>5403
>>5404
Fun fact: not all ants rape you, some of them buy you dinner first. No, I kid. The truth is, different types of ants have different modes of attack. Ants with stingers are similar to bees, in that they can sting once and then the stinger gets lodged in whatever they stung and pulls their guts out. Other types of ants don't sting, they just spray poison from their abdomen. They can attack over and over.

>>5405
What if I develop an immunity to the various attacks of ants? Could I, hypothetically, shove a variety of powerful ant species down my erect cock with a rod of some sort and use them as a sort of symbiotic projectile weapon? Like, I want to ejaculate a spray of deadly ants upon my enemies or really just any time I feel threatened. The niggers at the dollar store would never see it coming. They would, however, see me defiantly cumming a spicy barrage of ants in their general direction.
How do we go about doing it, bros?

>ITT Nigel turns a joke about ants being rapists into a vore fantasy involving ejaculting at niggers
Wont know until you try

>>5408
What the fuck are you talking about? I'm not the one who brought up ant sex. My response to this guy's weird ant fantasy is "what the fuck?". Seriously, this is weirder than that time I met a furry.

>>5409
Let me spell this out for you Nigel.
I made a joke about ants being both rapists, and about determination. Read it again. If theres one thing Ive learned by getting raped by ants, its that no matter how collossal your opponent is, you can still get off and make them feel pain.
It was a joke about how ants operate. Theyre literal gang rapists, against any 'threat' they perceive.

YOURE the one fantasizing about shoving them in ur dick and spraying them at people. Dont deflect, thats all on you.

I have another joke where ants are comparable to muslim rape gangs, but Im not gonna say it cuz of where OP might go with it

A human, compared to an ant, is collossal. Ergo, a human is a collossal adversary for an ant.
And yet, ants commit their lives to sticking their 'stinger' into their adversary and 'ejaculating' fluid that results in a white-fluid filled sore.
Ipsofacto, rape. Doesnt matter how big, the ant will sacrifice its life to jizz in you however available.

How do you go from THAT to "I wanna shove ants up my (quoting) erect penis with a ROD, so I can spray them at niggers"?
Seriously, get help.

>>5408
>>5410
>>5411
>obsessed with ant rape analogies
>makes a retarded joke about ants cumming inside him
>gets made fun of, but is too autistic to realize it and takes it at face value
>spergs out
>blames niggel
I'm fucking howling.

>>5414
>obsessed
I said it once, in a statement about determination. Unsurprisingly, people cant into english comprehension
>retarded joke
You're saying its inaccurate?
>made fun
Yes, it was humiliating watching Nigel go off the rails about furry self insert this, and ejaculating ants at niggers that. Whatever is one to do?
>spergs
Clarifying errant thinking and posturing is sperging? How do you manage socialization with that perception?
>Niggel
If you cant tell its him, Idk what to tell you
>Im totally howling guise, dont you believe me?

>>5415
You've been ranting over ant rape for, like, the past half dozen replies. If you don't see how that's humorous, then I have no advice for you other than to hop off the Internet for a while, champ.
>You're saying its inaccurate?
I'm saying it's funny that you think that way. Why do you think I made fun of your rambling by joking about spewing ants at niggers with my cock, something equally as absurd as likening ant stings to rape? You seem to be taking a conversation about ant rape very seriously, which is amusing.
>still blaming Nigel
Long after this site goes under, I'm sure you'll be yelling at a volleyball named "Nigel", Castaway style. You're still more annoying than he is.

>>5416
>half dozen replies
>ranting
Lets check the record
>>5402
Initial statement
>>5404
Initial response to deliberate lack of comprehension
>>5408
Single-sentence shitpost
>>5410
>>5411
Exhaustive rebuttal (which, being nearly impossible to argue against, is now resulting in more deliberate incomprehensiom and posturing)
>>5415
Refutation of factually incprrect statements
Now, in your 'brilliant' observations, which ones are rants? Am I "ranting" now?
>spewing ants from my cock is on the same level as likening ant stings to rape
Really now? So, calling ants - who stab a person with a probe on their body, and inject fluid into the site of the penetration - rapists is on par, somehow, with shoving ants into your dick and spraying them everywhere during ejaculation.
And you wanna impugn how my mind works? Fucking lol!
Reposting in full for posterity
(reminder, this is the natural mental process when stimulated with an ant rape joke)
>>5406
>What if I develop an immunity to the various attacks of ants? Could I, hypothetically, shove a variety of powerful ant species down my erect cock with a rod of some sort and use them as a sort of symbiotic projectile weapon? Like, I want to ejaculate a spray of deadly ants upon my enemies or really just any time I feel threatened. The niggers at the dollar store would never see it coming. They would, however, see me defiantly cumming a spicy barrage of ants in their general direction.
>How do we go about doing it, bros?
Credit where due, I did assume you and Nigel were the same person. It seemed reasonable enough, and the lazy thinking fit to a T. But as I saw later in the exchange (not that it rendered anything I said inaccurate) that there were two of you. I neglected to notice, and thats on me.

Having said, the rest speaks for its self, little faith that can be had that you'll comprehend what it says.

>>5417
Holy shit you're actually autistic.
What part of "I think you comparing ant stings to rape is absurd" is so difficult for you to pick up? Yes, ants sting and inject fluid into people when they feel threatened. The fact that you feel the need to compare to rape is funny because it shows how immature and autistic you are. I mutated your stupid, autistic rationael with my own so as to ridicule your thought process.
>egotistical
>has to appear as being "right"
>schizoid writing style
>obsessed with Nigel
Niggas? Is that you? Was it hard to stammer out that reply with your mangled hands, retard?

>>5418
Oh right, I'M the autist.
How is your response in any way comparable to my joke? I mean, the joke is based off observable phenomena in which the comparison can be drawn.
Please, illustrate how your thinking is remotely similar?
Next, Id like to know where Ive expressed egotism.
Next, I'd like to know which part you find 'scizoid', and how you qualify that position.
I skipped 'has to appear as being right', cuz thats inaccurate. I DO have to insist that my position is authentically represented, yes, but I dont have to appear right (I literally just acknowledved a fault in my position so, Idk where you're going with that).
>obssessed
Are you claiming that Nigel isnt the other poster? Wouldnt that mean I was right? Ergo its not an obsession, its pattern recognition? Let me guess, it is an obsession to observe that slovenly characters with brightly colored hair probably want to tell you their preferred pronouns?
Comparably, is it obsession to observe that when one or more people making egregious errors in logic and comprehension, that Nigel is at the heart of it?
Was I wrong?
>stammer
You should play in the NBA with reach like that

>>5419
>How is your response in any way comparable to my joke?
How long do we need to keep going in circles like this?
>I DO have to insist that my position is authentically represented
Again, can't you see how ridiculous this whole conversation is? You either lack the self awareness to do so or you know it, but just can't let go of petty squabbling, presumably due to your ego and apparently short temper. You do this all the time and it drives conversations into the ground.
>Are you claiming that Nigel isnt the other poster?
He had nothing to with the conversation until you brought him up, like you always do. In. Every. Other. Fucking. Thread.

>>5420
If by going in circles you mean 'dodging the question because you know theres no legitimacy to your point', as long as you prefer. Whether you found the joke funny or not, you have already admitted that ant stings could be compared to rape.
How is my joke comparable to your 'joke' of shoving ants up your dick? Is there some observable phenomenon that Im unaware of? Perhaps an indigenous people, or some craven animal that does this? Cuz it seems like YOUR thought process somehow came up with that, and while I havent taken a survey, somehow I doubt that any reasonable person would be able to make that sort of leap and THEN try to claim its on par.
>rodiculous
Oh, I can see how ridiculous this conversation is. I see how I posted a joke in the text of a determination-based post (reminder, this thread is supposed to be about offering advice and insight and such) and (you) seem hell bent on construing it in every possible way except the manner it was intended, and now doing his damndest to avoid acknowledging that you may have jumped the gun, or that your interest in coming after me may have been better suited to another attempt.
>you do this all the time
Citation?
>He had nothing to do with it
Is that a tacit admission that I WAS right, that he was precisely where I said he would be?
Thank you for admitting that I was correct, and that all your simping posturing is simply that.
While you're posturing, take note of how I didnt even mention his name until you were both trying to take me to task because you didnt get the joke? No, you got the joke, you were simply too intent on trying to get me for SOMETHING at LAST that you fired off half-cocked.
>Every. Other. Fucking. Thread.
And. Im. Right. 99%. Of. The. Time.

>dodging the question
I've told you repeatedly that I was just treating the subject matter with the level of seriousness it deserved; none whatsoever. That's why I made that silly post that caused you to sperg and bring up Nigel.
>How is my joke comparable to your 'joke' of shoving ants up your dick?
They're comparable because both are stupid, absurd jokes. Mine just happened to be sillier and funnier, given the reaction it elicited. Do you want me to debate you on the semantics of humor? Comparing ant bites to rape is silly and forcing ants down one's cock to blast minorities with is just a few steps more absurd.
>doing his damndest to avoid acknowledging that you may have jumped the gun, or that your interest in coming after me
I didn't wander in here with the explicit intention of "coming after you". It's just that your posting style and passionate love of Nigel stand out. This isn't some weird autistic grudge playing out over ant rape and cumming ants at niggers.
>Citation
Don't be coy. You do this all the time and anyone who's been here for any amount of time has seen it. I'm not the first one to point this out.
>Is that a tacit admission that I WAS right, that he was precisely where I said he would be?
I didn't enter this whole ordeal until I made that joke that you accused him of making. My post had nothing to do with him and we wouldn't even be talking about him if you didn't feel the need to bring him up.
>get me for SOMETHING at LAST
...And I would have gotten away with it, too! If only it wasn't for your clever wit and, presumably, smouldering good looks that totally pwnd me! Get real kek there's petty and then there's whatever this is.
>And. Im. Right. 99%. Of. The. Time.
You are, but you constantly agonizing over Niggel is almost as annoying as his posts. He's easily ignored. Tongue my anus, nigger.

>>5422
>moving goalposts
Pottery
>I didnt wander in here with the explicit intention [...] its that your posting style
So, implicit then? 2nd degree intent?
>Dont be coy
No u. Cite an example, and Ill illustrate how you're misphrasing or misframing it to appear to have a leg to stand on. Ill gladly speak to every post Ive made, and destroy your posturing in the process.
>you brought him up
Speculation in absence of evidence. I could speculate that this whole thing could have been avoided if you hadnt decided to make a ridiculous and off the wall 'parody' of the joke. Which unlike your position bears out with evidence. Unlike you however, I know that speculation is spurious and immaterial, so I dont. Youll get the memo eventually.
>whatever this is
You really should ask yourself, if you havent figured it out yet. Not that you have shown the reasoning ability, but Im an optimist so I say go for it.
>Yiu are r8ght
Very GOOD! You're making progress! Now, since you've been "paying attention", can you tell the class WHY I do so?
(Yes, that was an invitation. What will you choose? Intellectual honesty, or more pithy insults and characterizations that illustrate YOU, no matter how hard you try to assert that its 'me'?)
>jeopardy music playing
https://youtu.be/Yuu2_ATAY1w
>funnier

>>5423
>moving goalposts
Pot meet kettle.
My point is that you're just as annoying as Nigel, even when you rightfully shit on him. Funny that you accuse me of moving the goalpost when you dance around every point like a nigger that just got its food stamps. I don't care if you're right about his posts because yours are just as annoying. No, I'm not slogging through every thread marked by your presence and assembling evidence that your nubs are behind those posts just to prove a point that everyone here already knows.
>can you tell the class WHY I do so?
Because bitching about Niggel shitting up threads while you do the same seems to be your past time, which is gay.

>>5424
>as annoying as Nigel
>yours are just as annoying
>annoying 2x
Boy, couldnt wait to get that out could ya?
Oh wait, this is serious.
Oh no, are you saying you dont LIKE me? After all we've been through?
Credit for your halfhearted honesty though. The real crux is simply that; you dont like me, recognized my posts, and decided to try and give me what for. Howd that work out for ya?
I trust you'll be quick to go back and acknowledge all the posturing and deflection you were just doing? No?
>point that everyone here already knows
You mean that 'if Nigel can smear shit across the board/thread then I will do likewise, and if you dont like it, maybe he shouldnt be smearing shit across the board/thread'?

>>5425
This getting less amusing and more tedious as it goes on. You have the coherence of a babbling mental patient. I'm getting tired of trying to hammer the simple points into your head only to have you try to shift to conversation.
> The real crux is simply that; you dont like me, recognized my posts, and decided to try and give me what for
I don't think anyone likes you, dip shit. The only reason you and Nigel are tolerated is because this site is a dead meme that the moderation just doesn't want to put down by hammering retards like you two. Throw another one of your hissy fits and threaten to stop posting news articles. See who cares.
>and if you dont like it, maybe he shouldnt be smearing shit across the board/thread'?
Yes, because I'm responsible for the behavior of others. You think like a fucking paranoid woman. I can see how you were too incompetent to even be a moderator on a Mongolian basket weaving forum.
What I like has no bearing on either you or niggel shitting everything up. I'm honestly starting to think you're so combative and unfunny because you enjoy the attention that you get from other anons so much that just can't help yourself. I should know better than to engage you, yet you always find a new lowly way to be insufferable.
Go ahead and tik out another schizophrenic reply with your stumps, retard. I'm going to start treating you with the same level of respect you deserve. I'd make you my Nigel until you either stop posting, cut off too many fingers to post, or stop being so unbearably obtuse and retarded, but you'd probably just feed off the attention. I'll keep giving it to you until you finally get bored and fuck off.

>>5426
Thats the difference between us. For me this has been tedious since the beginning, yet you still cant admit you made a mistake. Spin things however makes you happy, your reasoning ability is on full display. If I seem incoherent, I must apologize for using a post 3rd grade writing style, it takes skill and nuance to grasp my prose. Im sure youll get there someday, I believe in you.
Seriously, you decided to make a stand cuz you didnt like a joke. Who's behaving like a woman? And yet you still expect me to take as credible anything you say? What's more, observe our demeanor. Ive asked you to validate all of your snark, all of your salt, whereas you have opted to throw out names, characterizations, and contempt from the very beginning. Cuz you didnt like my joke. Its plainly obvious who is bent, and who is defending themselves against an unreasonable imposition.
Go ahead! Call what Im doing a "hissy fit" or "sperging" or "half a dozen rants". Keep saying it; eventually, like a leftist you'll believe your own lies.
>Yes, because I'm responsible for the behavior of others.
Now apply that thinking. You really think you're going to change my behavior, while insisting that someone else's behavior isnt your responsibility? You seem divided in your own mind, alas you cant have it both ways.
>I should know better than to engage you
Thats the most astute thing you've said this whole exchange. Let me reiterate more simply.
Dont start none, wont be none
>Im going to start treating you with the respect you deserve
Oh, youve been respectful thus far? Curious.
>unbearably obtuse and retarded
Psychological transference is a bitch, good luck with that.

Since this is something of an advice thread, let me offer some.
>We criticize in others what we see in ourself
What this means is, every criticism, epithet, and slur you fling isnt directed at me, its directed at the 'me' you perceive, which is actually a reflection of yourself.
For the record, this is why I avoid needless insults; anything I could say (read: everything you've said) is a double-edged sword that cuts you far deeper than me, since your are vastly more familiar with you than you are with me.
I lost you again didn't I?
The simple version is, I know your taunts are spurious and based on a false impression, and that you're actually railing against your own perceived inadequacy.
First off, you're not inadequate, stop thinking that. Secondly, you should try arguing in good faith. Do you really think Im gonna be bothered by info I deliberately released to the site? C'mon man.
Everybody makes mistakes, and the ability to own up to them is a GOOD thing. You gotta laugh at yourself sometimes. And when you do, you'll be as unmoved by attempts to fling your mistakes in your face as I am.

>>5427
>yet you still cant admit you made a mistake.
Weapons grade projection.
>for using a post 3rd grade writing style
That's an insult to third graders.
>Seriously, you decided to make a stand cuz you didnt like a joke.
Literally you throughout this thread.
>Ive asked you to validate all of your snark, all of your salt, whereas you have opted to throw out names, characterizations, and contempt from the very beginning.
We're arguing over a joke about cumming ants onto niggers that offended you so much you felt the need for all this. You have done absolutely nothing but be obtuse and pedantic as I half-heartedly engaged you. I've done nothing but be patient and have tolerated your noxious behavior, largely because the whole scenario amused me. By the way, the entire argument is over a subjective matter of comedic taste. How that's beyond you is puzzling. I made my point clear repeatedly, yet you just keep spewing out diversions and regurgitating the same rhetoric like a broken toy.
>You really think you're going to change my behavior, while insisting that someone else's behavior isnt your responsibility?
Again, we get more of your usual, nonsensical claptrap. How are either of these things contradictory? You argue like you're demented. Just sit and read what you just wrote.
You aren't my responsibility no matter how affected you are by my posts. There's your dose of >"spoon-feeding".

>>5429
>No u
Classic

>shitting up the Wisdoms thread
For shame.

>>5431
Not my intention, and I accept fault for not taking it to the pub.

>>5431
This.

>>5431
>>5433
Are y'all gonna beat a dead hoers, or are ya gonna post wisdoms to counteract? Be the change.

>>5434
It's fine poner. I was just shitposting.

You gotta do the work
https://youtu.be/tJVAsZQrLR0

You're no "Free Thinker" if you only think what Paid "Thinkers" tell you to.

>>5737
Yup. And they are free thinkers because the TV told them so.

https://youtu.be/gh87OVCYY_g
Introversion explained by an introvert

https://youtu.be/Z11ygYzcDQw
Excerpted from one of Jordan Peterson's lectures in a series
OP, I recognize that these posts do not exactly align with the posted intent of this thread; if desired I will desist.

WHY MEN ARE SELDOM DEPRESSED.
https://johndenugent.com/us-army-medical-officer-whistleblower-pentagon-is-alterering-data-to-cover-up-massive-vaxx-injuries-humor-about-men/

Never give up.

>Always Listen To Your Gut Instinct - (4:40 Long)
>There are things you instinctually know long before your head has figured it out. Lana talks about the importance of listening to your gut instinct. Your gut doesn't lie but people do.
https://odysee.com/@redicetv:1/RITV-TrustYourGut:7
Mirrors:
https://tv.gab.com/channel/redicetv/view/always-listen-to-your-gut-instinct-631116d9023df567c65c1808
https://www.bitchute.com/video/FT3FDtgfuSNU/

Exclusively posting nonsense when replying to obvious bots might fuck with them and pollute the data they use.

>>5986
Perhaps, but it might encourage more bot posting if their use is based on number of replays.

>>5988
Who would run a bot on numerous sites at once and determine which sites are worth running that bot on based on replys?

>>5989
A contractor working for the glowniggers who needs to justify the paycheck.

>>5990
If a JIDF shill got hundreds of comments mocking him he'd still get paid, taking money away from the jews, right?

>>5986
Only if you sage.

Don't masturbate

Satisfaction guaranteed.

>>6422
>boomer
Physical punishment has always worked wonders, specially on spoiled brats.

>>6423
It's still a faceberg style boomer meme, regardless of the sentiment.
My advice: The shopping carts at walmart are free. You can just take them, nobody cares. The same thing goes for ducks at the park. You can hit up Wally world for the cart, walk to the park, snatch some ducks, and make off like a bandit.

>>6424
The pens at the banks are also free.

>>6424
>It's still a faceberg style boomer meme, regardless of the sentiment.
Ahem. This is the wisdom thread.

>>6430
Also I can't wait to post this Applejack.

Meh, I couldn't find the boomer shim pic. You win for now.

>>6433
Luckily I've got a lot.

Your habits decide your future.

>>6480
BASED