/sp/ - Football

>>584
nevermind, its still pretty mental.

>>582
Checked.
Moar?

not sure if i am okay with a fluffy thread on the front page. we already had one here that 404ed a long while ago. that shit is both retarded and disgusting.

>>586
All there is of that series up till now, i think they guy is still making moat

>>588
Last time i read this it was two years ago. I haven't seen more since.

>>567
I really don't mind but im afraid it would generate drama.

>>570
This thread, there is some people coming planning about the fluffiest and a lot of people dumping abuse.
It's kind of funny, this started as trolling to derail mlp threads with fluffy ponies and now people post ponies on fluffy threads to derail them.

I want to see them suffer

>>534
bump

>>593

we usually dont bump here. unless you have new content, try to restrain yourself from doing this. this thread is a pretty low quality topic as it is.

>>594

also i hate the google chrome pony now. never liked her, her artist was always a libcuck.

>>594
Then just hide the thread....
You say this thread is low quality yet you don't contribute by posting fluffy ponies.
Get out.

>>596
>>574

I usually dont hide threads unless i suspect them of shilling. You are in your full right to post whatever you want. That said, this wont cut it though. Even the mod word by word said this is a low quality thread and judging from the general responses this thread got, the posted content and the overall activity pattern I would vouch to anchorbump it, so that it naturally progresses to 404.

We had a Fluffy Pony thread for educational purposes when MLPOL.NET was newly founded. While it maintained some degree of initial interest, few people have a genuine desire to see it here on a regular basis. I would go as far as to say a thread like this is bad to have on the frontpage of our main board if we have new users for visit here.

>>535
To keep in /pol/ context I think

>>599
topkek

>>597
We could have a thread to discuss fluffy ponies then kill this one, but i think hardly anyone would want to post on that, besides what is there to discuss about fluffy ponies?
They are little horses made to be killed, we would get more discussion out of degeneracy: The game (attached)

>>601
There are infinite possibilities you can think of--different scenarios that they deserve to die in, suffering, and torture driven narratives. Your lack of creativity is very apparent due to your inadequacy of derived taste in fluffy pony threads. Hans is a text book left-brainer with no purpose in life who could easily be replaced by a computer, while my right-brained antics will award me with a bright future of innovative solutions and significant contributions to the human race.

>>599
Kek

>>602
>fluffy abuse -> contributions to human race
Sorry, even I can't reach that high

>There are infinite possibilities you can think of–different scenarios that they deserve to die in, suffering, and torture driven narratives
I'm a grimmdark junkie, I know this stuff for quite a while now, yet I don't see what good can it bring to mlpol, to anyone in general.
It is but an appeal to the most basics of instincts, it doesn't even teach you about what causes fear not good torture techniques nor anatomy and it definitely doesn't makes you more tolerant to gore if someone's head explodes by your side.
It is just silly amusement, like watching porn, you get nothing but instant pleasure and a few laughs out of it.
>Your lack of creativity is very apparent due to your inadequacy of derived taste in fluffy pony threads.
Now now anon, it is a logical falacy to use personal attacks to argue. My creativity has nothing to do with this.
>Hans is a text book left-brainer with no purpose in life who could easily be replaced by a computer
Where did this come from?
I'm I supposed to know who hans is?
>(...)while my right-brained antics will award me with a bright future of innovative solutions and significant contributions to the human race.
How and why? Read my first paragraph and tell me how fluffy abuse gives you more creativity.

>>620
You're actually retarded and there's no hope for you. Hide thread and move on already.

>>637

just to clarify that >>620 is not me, I am me. You are You.

>>642
I think I was responding to the slovak who has been relentlessly harassing me across all threads with his reddit hugbox attitude and "Don't like what I don't like!" elitism. Hans is fine; at least he understands sarcasm.

>>643
>>637
The heck are you talking about, i just said there is nothing to discuss about fluffy abuse, its just something a tiny group of people like and that is why it should not be on the frontpage of /mlpol/
If you are too much of a retard to understand my point just respond to this without a proper argument.
So you may know i like fluffy abuse, you meanie

>>651
A small amount of people is still a large amount of people given the relative tiny size of the total userbase. And that was in relation to a very small group of people pushing for a hugbox for the mentally disabled called /selfimprovement/, which is even less related. Fluffy ponies is at least pony related thus has a place on the main board. I could see an argument saying that its not quite related to ponies **enough** even though it is, but there are plenty of things on the main board that are even more off topic than fluffy ponies that are still up. Literally the real reason this was moved is because some mods have contrary opinions so they abuse their power.

>>658
Now that's more like my language;
Indeed I did not count on the random shitpost threads that are up and people don't give a damn if pony related or not, you have quite a point there.
Now thing is we should measure the quantity of people that want fluffy ponies on the main board, if we make a proper argument and we call for votes, we could get that gore on the front page, specially since the rules say "ponies allowed, no exception"
If mods are too much of a fag to see some gore and ponies dying, they should man up, the mlp fandom was funded on this shit, it will only make our users used to seeing this and ignore it whenever they want to argue instead of getting triggered.
You have a clear path anon, defend your ideals, If you want I will advocate for your cause.

>>658
>>681
Hello

The move to /sp/ it wasn't anything malicous. The fluffy pony thread was created before /sp/ was created and we felt that the thread would be better suited on /sp/ and get more traction on /sp/ than the main board. We didn't move it out of hate or distaste toward the thread, it was discussed with a few of the staff members and we agreed it made sense to move it here on /sp/.

As for the locking of the original when you move a thread it auto locks the original thread it's part of the software we use and how it is setup. We have manually unlocked the thread on the main board. We do respect the fluffy pony threads as a part of /MLP/ culture and will protect it's right to exist on mlpol.net

>>688
>discussed with the staff members

Why wasn't this discussed on mlpol.net? It could have just been put to a vote. I'm sure enough people including the mods could have arrived at a consensus on the board. And why does this thread keep getting moved around by different mods? And why do you say this thread would receive more traffic on /sp/ than on /mlpol/? That's obviously not the case because 10 times as many people go on mlpol as they do sp. I appreciate some of the mods who stood up for this thread but the ones who didn't should think less about their emotions and more about the rules that the board was founded upon. What exactly constitutes shitposting is a highly subjective topic, but absolutely no shitposting allowed is a very unappealing attitude to exhibit while maintaining a board. A form of censorship and a tactic the left often uses is simply saying something they don't like is just shitposting in order to get it removed so they can perpetuate their hugbox atmosphere. Also calling in the mods to censor is a more divisive alternative to self moderation by the users who can use numerous methods to slide threads they don't like, or just hide them. These pathetic pleas can be observed by scrolling up in this thread. Read the policy page; nowhere does it say gore isn't allowed. Not sure why lines on paper would trigger somepony so much; it's not even real. Also, have a sense of humor please it makes the board less stale.

I understood that the main thread was locked a second time because it was moved, I'm just confused as to why the thread was moved in the first place. I've even had completely normal political threads randomly deleted before, and banned for reposting them without any reason given about its deletion. At this point it's not even worth it for me to keep complaining to the mods because some mod will just fuck with it anyways. I'll just have to accept that some of you are faggots I guess.

>>703
There are no rules against gore or fluffy, and as stated in the moderator's post above, this thread now exists both on /mlpol/ and on /sp/. There is no censorship of fluffy, both threads are fine.

>I've even had completely normal political threads randomly deleted before, and banned for reposting them without any reason given about its deletion.
Can you please elaborate on this? I would like to know what you are referring to. I do know there was an individual who was accidentally banned a few weeks ago, during the height of the /inta/ raids, because he posted a thread three times from three sepetate IPs, and it was thought he was an /inta/ infiltrator or raider. Could you please provide more information?

>>705
Oh yea that was me. There was no reason to be suspicious. I posted a political thread with one archived link.

>>705
We could use some reorganization but I am paranoid of /inta/ operating on mlpol.net

>>707
I see. We're sorry about that. That was in a week where /inta/ was raiding every few hours, and had done things like posting an IP harvester from a "spamming tools" link in a thread they made. I believe the first two threads you were posted from proxies with no history on the board, like all posts from /inta/, which must have been what lead the moderators on at 3:00 AM that night to believe you were attempting a false flag, making a normal looking post to acquire a posting history, or had some other nefarious purposes. To be sure, they'd have seen you were a regular user if they had checked your posting history, but it was the heat of the moment and late at night. I unbanned you in the morning when I looked through the ban list and recognized your hash. We're terribly sorry about that, and have resolved to be more cautious.

>>707
I'm the mod who banned you, sorry about the mix up. As mentioned it was during the period while we were being raided. inta at one point had a thread up about how to infiltrate and divide us, they specifically mentioned that we take posting history into account when banning so they advised their users to try to build up a legitimate looking post history and then start gradually making distracting or divisive slide threads, similar to how shills on /pol/ operate. Obviously anyone attempting to create this kind of environment is something we would want to identify and root out early as it is precisely the kind of thing we created this board to get away from.

As a result we were (and are) keeping an eye out for new ips posting suspicious looking threads. The thread you posted was initially deleted because the tone of the post came across as nu-pol style writing and the associated IP had no post history. I deleted it to see what you'd do. When the exact same post came through again twice from two different ips, I decided to treat it as an infiltration and ban.

Again, sorry about the mix up, just be advised mods tend to be a little more trigger-happy during periods where the board is being actively raided, and we're more suspicious of ips with no posting history, particularly when the first post is a new thread. If you use proxies or post from a phone, this can sometimes cause us to mistake legitimate posters for raiders.

>>5558
REEEEEEEEEE

kek the fluffy thread is saved

I used to draw fluffies, but then newfags from /b/ took over the fluffybooru and turned it into the polar opposite of everything the original fandom had been about. Their version of the fandom is based entirely on sheer hate and disgust, so everyone who liked or would like the original concept takes one look at the booru and decides that that mindless ragebox isn't for them.

The oldschool fandom was something truly unique, and surprisingly deep too. It still has its fans, but it's hard to get them together when the most famous site of the fandom is now dedicated to demonizing fluffies and depicting them as the most heinous things imaginable.

>>7029
I'm afraid I don't know anything about the oldschool fandom. I discovered this fluffy business on /b/ around 2015 or so I think, in the form of "fluffy abuse threads." I laughed my ass off the first time I saw one. I had no real connection to MLP at the time and didn't really like or dislike ponies or bronies. I personally just found the idea of an entire fandom devoted to thinking up new ways to torture obnoxious imaginary creatures to be the funniest most autistic thing I'd ever seen. It's a perfect anti-aesthetic: the poorly drawn images, the ugliness and repulsiveness of the fluffies even when they're drawn well, the stupid baby-speak they do and the way they shit on everything, the ridiculous stories people concoct about them that always end in some kind of excessive ridiculous mutilation of the fluffy. The whole thing is just so tastelessly over the top I can't help but kek at it. I'm legitimately sorry they don't allow those threads on /b/ anymore, it was one of the last types of threads on that board that I found worth lurking; fluffy threads are funnier than "Andy's logs" at any rate.

I only ever understood the "fandom" in terms of the ridiculous over the top fluffy abuse images, I don't really care about the hugbox stuff or any of the mythology the fandom has created, I mostly just lurked the threads to laugh at crazy shit. Basically I can't see this fandom as anything more than a source of cheap laughs. I guess I'm part of the problem you described.

Is it true that all this Fluffy Pony nonsense was once someone's boringly happy fanfic about bio-engineered cute life forms that barely shit at all due to eating special animal kibble or some shit, but fans found this so boring they made their own ultra-violent fucked-up version where the Fluffies were stolen by bioterrorists and turned into the world's biggest pest, shitting all over the place because real food does that and their minimal-waste kibble wasn't produced any more thanks to lawsuits?

I heard this grimdark-ifying of the original material made its initial creator leave the fandom in disgust, while creating something so edgy and ugly and dark that only the pathetic bullyfags were able to find any enjoyment out of it and mocking the occasional "Hugboxer" who wants some cute pony shit to happen in the setting, rather than another "Adult cool edgy" abuse fantasy.

>>601
The fuck is "Raunch" supposed to be? I refuse to play the game and find out until somebody tells me.

>>7113
>This
Please.

>>7111
>I guess I'm part of the problem you described.
Nah, that kind of stuff is exactly what most people enjoy.

>>7112
Now THIS describes the actual cancer of the fandom! Fluffies have always faced gory deaths, but /b/tards thought that they'd also have to be irredeemably evil in order to deserve all the abuse. They wanted to feel like heroes while abusing defenseless creatures so they had to come up with every possible way to make the fluffies as despicable as possible. Their interpretation of fluffies became the literal opposite of the original concept and is now known as the hellgremlin fandom - a fandom dedicated entirely to getting enraged by hideous little psychos encapsulating "all the worst sides of humanity". The post in >>601 describes this perfectly and is toted like the Quran by the hellgremlinists themselves.

Fluffies getting banned from /b/ may well be the best thing to happen to the fandom since its very founding. The appeal of getting trolled by imaginary creatures wears out fast, and without a constant influx of newfags from /b/ to keep the ragefest going, the fandom has again become a more hospitable place for those who actually want to enjoy the fluffies.

Without /b/, the oldschool fluffies are once again becoming the majority, and the last time I checked the fluffybooru it actually left me feeling happier rather than angrier for doing so. I quit the fandom when things were bleak, but now I'm seriously considering getting back to drawing fluffies myself.

>>7142
Never really bothered to fuck with fluffies, but these screencaps intrigue me. if you don't mind, what is the original media called, and where could I find it?

>>7265
The best place for original stuff is http://fluffy.booru.org/ . It has been mostly inactive since the new fluffybooru.org was founded, but since the newer booru has basically become a containment site for /b/tard rapefugees I'm hoping the fluffy.booru site could reawaken as a hub for the original fandom again.

Speaking of fluffybooru (without the dot) becoming a containment site, the state of the fandom outside it isn't as bleak as fluffybooru might suggest. The vast majority of people on other sites and imageboards still like the original fluffies, and it seems fluffybooru.org is really the only place where all the shit and hatred has been distilled in.

idk

f

What happen to Egoralexeev? He's one of top on abuse quality content.