For calm interpersonal discussions and questions and answers.
Also didn't deserve their own thread, but is geared for community engagements.
Also for community input and other things that happen to not be a question or an answer.
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
1690948814_2.gif (854.8 KB, 340x213, 9ECDA514F9170D903A7E1DC01352C58E-875324.gif)
411 replies and 135 files omitted.
Boom:
>Look guys I'm so cool I don't care about how you see me
Also Boom:
>LOVE ME, AGREE WITH EVERYTHING I SAY, PLATFORM ME OR YOU'RE EVIL
>Look guys I'm so cool I don't care about how you see me
Also Boom:
>LOVE ME, AGREE WITH EVERYTHING I SAY, PLATFORM ME OR YOU'RE EVIL
>Threads take effort and time to build
Yeah. Threads also die when it's time though. Some are reborn.
There's some posting behaviors that improve the longevity of threads.
Most call it positive engagement.
Threads are built upon mutual engagment.
Decent threads are built either vertically and horizontally.
Vertical threads rely on a single source such as a specific story or green text posted by some Anon. Other Anon's tend to imput greater depth.
Horizontal threads rely upon every contribution by each Anon having a wide breadth. Each interaction increasing the interconnected knowledge of topics usually not brushed upon.
Most threads are some mix of both.
The shape and structure of threads isn't covered here.
This applies to both additive and refining and destructive interactions.
Additive interactions increase something of the communication.
Refining interactions refine and hone something of the communication.
Destructive interactions burn communications down. That is burnt bridges.
Threads subsist on Additive and Refining interactions.
That's positive engagement.
Destructive interactions are the reply to Additive and Refining interactions. The end result is punishing Additive or Refining interactions. Which means threads die. Which also means decreased trust.
As Additive and Refining interactions are the heart and soul of communication thus positive healthy relationships. There is too much of a good thing or one or the other which can also degrade interpersonal relationships.
Yeah. Threads also die when it's time though. Some are reborn.
There's some posting behaviors that improve the longevity of threads.
Most call it positive engagement.
Threads are built upon mutual engagment.
Decent threads are built either vertically and horizontally.
Vertical threads rely on a single source such as a specific story or green text posted by some Anon. Other Anon's tend to imput greater depth.
Horizontal threads rely upon every contribution by each Anon having a wide breadth. Each interaction increasing the interconnected knowledge of topics usually not brushed upon.
Most threads are some mix of both.
The shape and structure of threads isn't covered here.
This applies to both additive and refining and destructive interactions.
Additive interactions increase something of the communication.
Refining interactions refine and hone something of the communication.
Destructive interactions burn communications down. That is burnt bridges.
Threads subsist on Additive and Refining interactions.
That's positive engagement.
Destructive interactions are the reply to Additive and Refining interactions. The end result is punishing Additive or Refining interactions. Which means threads die. Which also means decreased trust.
As Additive and Refining interactions are the heart and soul of communication thus positive healthy relationships. There is too much of a good thing or one or the other which can also degrade interpersonal relationships.
>>8152
Allow myself to be super clear then. If you cannot stand how we run things, make a thread asking for things to be changed and be open to discussion.
If you do not wish to do this, engage in conversation about how you are not in violation of any rules.
If you do not wish to do this, alter you posting behavior to one of many suggestions to better fit with policy.
If you do not wish to do this, you are left with two choices: deal with our judgement when you fall out of line when you refuse to obey the policy page, or stop posting.
Obviously, stopping posting is not desirable in itself, but if you refuse all other options it is not off the table for you to decide.
>>8154
Literally yes. You must demand a change or we will continue current enforcement. That is just how it works. You bitching at me building some secret cult of anti-you posters does not make any change to the policy page.
>>8155
Again, who is the irrational person here? I have said to talk this out and you are out here demanding I be tortured and killed for opposing your intolerable behavior. Fucking talk it out pussy.
Allow myself to be super clear then. If you cannot stand how we run things, make a thread asking for things to be changed and be open to discussion.
If you do not wish to do this, engage in conversation about how you are not in violation of any rules.
If you do not wish to do this, alter you posting behavior to one of many suggestions to better fit with policy.
If you do not wish to do this, you are left with two choices: deal with our judgement when you fall out of line when you refuse to obey the policy page, or stop posting.
Obviously, stopping posting is not desirable in itself, but if you refuse all other options it is not off the table for you to decide.
>>8154
Literally yes. You must demand a change or we will continue current enforcement. That is just how it works. You bitching at me building some secret cult of anti-you posters does not make any change to the policy page.
>>8155
Again, who is the irrational person here? I have said to talk this out and you are out here demanding I be tortured and killed for opposing your intolerable behavior. Fucking talk it out pussy.
>anon posts a doctoral dissertation on post quality
>"And yet (you) aren't posting"
Fucking kill yourself. I'm serious.
>"And yet (you) aren't posting"
Fucking kill yourself. I'm serious.
>>8164
>anon posts a doctoral dissertation on post quality
I agree, it is top notch and deserves praise, I even took a screenshot ans save it. That said, he is not posting.
>anon posts a doctoral dissertation on post quality
I agree, it is top notch and deserves praise, I even took a screenshot ans save it. That said, he is not posting.
>>8165
How the fuck do you know he doesn't post? He is an anon. Do you have the post history?
Oh wait, you don't. I do though. Let's see. Oh, would you look at that, over 500 posts on this IP alone. Stop being the arbiter of who is or is not a poster.
How the fuck do you know he doesn't post? He is an anon. Do you have the post history?
Oh wait, you don't. I do though. Let's see. Oh, would you look at that, over 500 posts on this IP alone. Stop being the arbiter of who is or is not a poster.
>>8167
My post counting surely crossed the 50K mark long ago, no kidding. That said, I referring to the lack of board activity, there is sporadic posting only, then hardly I will take any advise from fence sitters.
My post counting surely crossed the 50K mark long ago, no kidding. That said, I referring to the lack of board activity, there is sporadic posting only, then hardly I will take any advise from fence sitters.
>>8168
I really don't give a shit if you had 50 billion posts and were the only active user and this guy showed up randomly just now to hit you with this. You have no power from your position.
You now have an ultimatum. We discuss this now or I will take action until you decide to.
I really don't give a shit if you had 50 billion posts and were the only active user and this guy showed up randomly just now to hit you with this. You have no power from your position.
You now have an ultimatum. We discuss this now or I will take action until you decide to.
>>8168
How about you go sit on a barbed wire fence you useless fucking geriatric piece of shit. Better yet, impale yourself on the top of a fencepost ass-first and die like you lived: a massive fucking faggot.
How about you go sit on a barbed wire fence you useless fucking geriatric piece of shit. Better yet, impale yourself on the top of a fencepost ass-first and die like you lived: a massive fucking faggot.
Every goddamn burst of activity comes from this walking sewage pipe who seems to think being showered with liquid shit every day is better than getting small bouts of seasonal rain. And he is actually PROUD of the fact he has 50,000 posts where all he does is post a bunch of shit off his drive or mindlessly tell others that they aren't posting enough for his tastes -- nevermind that those people are actually putting thought and care into their posts once in a red moon. This is what I get for even looking at this site while I wait for eviction. I have less reasons to be mad with doorcampers in Rust than I do for people like Boom.
>>8162
>am blind
You can work on it.
>>8170
It's this weird anti-social stubbornness for no rhyme or reason. You could literally have what you want if you asked. Most problems go away by talking.
I hate talking over many forms of mediums.
It's boggling.
Your solution is there free for the taking.
I only understand via my own shortcomings. I know what I need but I don't know how to obtain or if it's even in my grasp to do so. To actually do what I want.
From this position seeing it play out again yet in a different perspective and coat of paint.
I think you can have your solution and the means to your solutions. You'd be even more able to accomplish whatever you set your heart to.
It's at the core trying to stone wall people rather than address the metaphysical powers.
I don't know how to teach social skills, but I'm sure it does exist somewhere. Psychology and Sociology is as close to checkmarks one can get to, but in this day and age there are a plethora of resources. Many that are free.
>am blind
You can work on it.
>>8170
It's this weird anti-social stubbornness for no rhyme or reason. You could literally have what you want if you asked. Most problems go away by talking.
I hate talking over many forms of mediums.
It's boggling.
Your solution is there free for the taking.
I only understand via my own shortcomings. I know what I need but I don't know how to obtain or if it's even in my grasp to do so. To actually do what I want.
From this position seeing it play out again yet in a different perspective and coat of paint.
I think you can have your solution and the means to your solutions. You'd be even more able to accomplish whatever you set your heart to.
It's at the core trying to stone wall people rather than address the metaphysical powers.
I don't know how to teach social skills, but I'm sure it does exist somewhere. Psychology and Sociology is as close to checkmarks one can get to, but in this day and age there are a plethora of resources. Many that are free.
>>8132
Not using the report function is kinda of a weird thing to get banned for. If someone is helpful to point out that, or just ask the question whether or not a thread might be better suited on another board, isn't this just good for the mods since it helps make their work easier.
>generals
Yes, it always been in the rules but I don't think we actually have use that rule up till this point. I should know because I have been in favour that we should have been using it more in the past. To reiterate my point for clarity: I pretty sure we haven't used the "no generals" rule much up until this point but there has been many instances where we could have, imo.
And did he get banned for posting to a general? But wouldn't it make more sense for him to be banned for posting a general not to a general, since the first one should be lock or remove anyway?
I see that our guy uses a vpns and such so a ban probably means nothing to him. There might also be some context to this that I'm missing. I haven't read all this thread because it's kinda of a lot.
I'm just giving you my limited opinions.
Not using the report function is kinda of a weird thing to get banned for. If someone is helpful to point out that, or just ask the question whether or not a thread might be better suited on another board, isn't this just good for the mods since it helps make their work easier.
>generals
Yes, it always been in the rules but I don't think we actually have use that rule up till this point. I should know because I have been in favour that we should have been using it more in the past. To reiterate my point for clarity: I pretty sure we haven't used the "no generals" rule much up until this point but there has been many instances where we could have, imo.
And did he get banned for posting to a general? But wouldn't it make more sense for him to be banned for posting a general not to a general, since the first one should be lock or remove anyway?
I see that our guy uses a vpns and such so a ban probably means nothing to him. There might also be some context to this that I'm missing. I haven't read all this thread because it's kinda of a lot.
I'm just giving you my limited opinions.
>>8177
See >>8142
Plus that's what the report function is for. The report function is there for something that the administration can see easily a suggested course of action for the description of the reported post.
If something isn't ever supposed to be it'll be able to get whacked efficiently whenever they are online.
A regular post does none of that.
A regular post doesn't alert, isn't a call to action, and degrades a thread to being more like /qa/.
There's also /qa/ which the administration checks and responds as administrators.
As in /qa/ is where questions are answered. For dialogue with the administrators and moderators about tangentially related topics.
Such as threads, site related stuff, rules, post modification or deletion, conduct, features, possible new stuff and more.
The key is the Talking with.
A post outside of /qa/ about things that should be in /qa/ (or a report) will have anons know its not supposed to be in that thread as it is. Which in turn leads to posts that are off topic and could in theory generate more reports or /qa/ thread/posts.
Necro bumping an actual thread with totally off topic that by all intents and purposes is dead (saying it should be dead in another section), isn't great. Again all things considered in the situation at hand.
Instead if you have an actual project post that as that new thread once the old one dies in the new location.
Or use the /qa/ or report to ask for it to be moved to somewhere more appropriate.
(I mean it was page 10 dead on /ub/ that's about as dead as it gets. Just let it die.)
See >>8142
Plus that's what the report function is for. The report function is there for something that the administration can see easily a suggested course of action for the description of the reported post.
If something isn't ever supposed to be it'll be able to get whacked efficiently whenever they are online.
A regular post does none of that.
A regular post doesn't alert, isn't a call to action, and degrades a thread to being more like /qa/.
There's also /qa/ which the administration checks and responds as administrators.
As in /qa/ is where questions are answered. For dialogue with the administrators and moderators about tangentially related topics.
Such as threads, site related stuff, rules, post modification or deletion, conduct, features, possible new stuff and more.
The key is the Talking with.
A post outside of /qa/ about things that should be in /qa/ (or a report) will have anons know its not supposed to be in that thread as it is. Which in turn leads to posts that are off topic and could in theory generate more reports or /qa/ thread/posts.
Necro bumping an actual thread with totally off topic that by all intents and purposes is dead (saying it should be dead in another section), isn't great. Again all things considered in the situation at hand.
Instead if you have an actual project post that as that new thread once the old one dies in the new location.
Or use the /qa/ or report to ask for it to be moved to somewhere more appropriate.
(I mean it was page 10 dead on /ub/ that's about as dead as it gets. Just let it die.)
>>8177
>Not using the report function is kinda of a weird thing to get banned for.
Instead of necro-bumping a thread to suggest it should be moved to another board, he should have either used /qa/ or the report feature.
>But wouldn't it make more sense for him to be banned for posting a general not to a general, since the first one should be lock or remove anyway?
He's OP of multiple generals. And he brags about it constantly. You'll be made aware of this fact if you simply use the site regularly.
>I see that our guy uses a vpns and such so a ban probably means nothing to him.
I dunno, he's royaly pissed whenever it happens. And he backs away whenever it happens. I think it's worth a try. It must be at least quite the annoyance if he reacts like that.
>There might also be some context to this that I'm missing. I haven't read all this thread because it's kinda of a lot.
As always.
>Not using the report function is kinda of a weird thing to get banned for.
Instead of necro-bumping a thread to suggest it should be moved to another board, he should have either used /qa/ or the report feature.
>But wouldn't it make more sense for him to be banned for posting a general not to a general, since the first one should be lock or remove anyway?
He's OP of multiple generals. And he brags about it constantly. You'll be made aware of this fact if you simply use the site regularly.
>I see that our guy uses a vpns and such so a ban probably means nothing to him.
I dunno, he's royaly pissed whenever it happens. And he backs away whenever it happens. I think it's worth a try. It must be at least quite the annoyance if he reacts like that.
>There might also be some context to this that I'm missing. I haven't read all this thread because it's kinda of a lot.
As always.
>>8169
>"ultimatum"
>until you decide to
Why do you keep moving the goalpost? Either ban him or don't. He's been a scourge on this site and has never once shown intention to change. He thinks he's Jesus Christ just because he posts more than others, with no regard to the quality of content that he posts or that nobody is engaging with it (in fact, I think it suppresses other posters, because it feels like he's the only one they're talking to). He randomly calls other Anons "newfags" (even when they've been around longer than him) or "shills" (as if) when they dare to disagree with him or consider nuance in conversation. He derails discussions that don't go his way by burying them in memes from this Facebook algorithm. He drives other users away because when they log onto the site under the presumption that it's "better quality than /pol/" all they see is his shitposts drowning out everything else. He openly scoffs at standards of etiquette and quality that have been customary on /mlpol/ and 4chan since long before he started posting here.
Of course, none of the above things are banable, but they're reasons why it's not worth giving him more slack when this behavior is coupled with his willful and repetitive violation of this site's rules. He is not willing to change, so why keep forgiving him or applying impotent one-day bans?
>"ultimatum"
>until you decide to
Why do you keep moving the goalpost? Either ban him or don't. He's been a scourge on this site and has never once shown intention to change. He thinks he's Jesus Christ just because he posts more than others, with no regard to the quality of content that he posts or that nobody is engaging with it (in fact, I think it suppresses other posters, because it feels like he's the only one they're talking to). He randomly calls other Anons "newfags" (even when they've been around longer than him) or "shills" (as if) when they dare to disagree with him or consider nuance in conversation. He derails discussions that don't go his way by burying them in memes from this Facebook algorithm. He drives other users away because when they log onto the site under the presumption that it's "better quality than /pol/" all they see is his shitposts drowning out everything else. He openly scoffs at standards of etiquette and quality that have been customary on /mlpol/ and 4chan since long before he started posting here.
Of course, none of the above things are banable, but they're reasons why it's not worth giving him more slack when this behavior is coupled with his willful and repetitive violation of this site's rules. He is not willing to change, so why keep forgiving him or applying impotent one-day bans?
>>8182
Boom Booms is like Saul Goodman at Davis & Main. Even if he weren't breaking the rules and flipping off the cop that pulled him over, he's still doing his damnedest to get into trouble, all because his Telegram buddies said that chans are mean and he assumed that's all he has to do to be one of the anons. Every rule of etiquette to him is an obstacle to be circumvented or bruteforced. Not one time since I first saw a post that I knew was from him did he seem interested in doing anything but shit on everything and everyone and tell them it's good for their skin.
Boom Booms is like Saul Goodman at Davis & Main. Even if he weren't breaking the rules and flipping off the cop that pulled him over, he's still doing his damnedest to get into trouble, all because his Telegram buddies said that chans are mean and he assumed that's all he has to do to be one of the anons. Every rule of etiquette to him is an obstacle to be circumvented or bruteforced. Not one time since I first saw a post that I knew was from him did he seem interested in doing anything but shit on everything and everyone and tell them it's good for their skin.
>>8180
I agree that that necro-bumping was unnecessary.
>>8179
Yes, it makes sense to use the report function but I disagree that you should be banned for trying to be helpful to mods. It seems like that was the intention of the post, unless he just did it to be annoying.
>>8180
>He's OP of multiple generals.
Okay, but was he OP of that thread?
>he's royaly pissed whenever it happen
Not to say that he needs to be correct because of this but he seems the least pissed off in general, ITT and elsewhere.
I agree that that necro-bumping was unnecessary.
>>8179
Yes, it makes sense to use the report function but I disagree that you should be banned for trying to be helpful to mods. It seems like that was the intention of the post, unless he just did it to be annoying.
>>8180
>He's OP of multiple generals.
Okay, but was he OP of that thread?
>he's royaly pissed whenever it happen
Not to say that he needs to be correct because of this but he seems the least pissed off in general, ITT and elsewhere.
>>8184
>he seems the least pissed off in general
The retard said he was being "crucified", over a one-day ban and some other Anons calling him out.
>he seems the least pissed off in general
The retard said he was being "crucified", over a one-day ban and some other Anons calling him out.
>>8185
Hmm, yeah maybe I retract that. I think I just wanted everyone to calm down, I guess.
You guys can probably have fair points and I will reveal my bias: I kinda like a lot of his threads and posts. Not everything but to call it all sewage doesn't ring true to me.
Hmm, yeah maybe I retract that. I think I just wanted everyone to calm down, I guess.
You guys can probably have fair points and I will reveal my bias: I kinda like a lot of his threads and posts. Not everything but to call it all sewage doesn't ring true to me.
>>8182
Maybe because he isn't an admin?
>>8184
>unless he just did it to be annoying.
He was told necro-bumping the thread was wrong. And then he went on a smug tirade against it. He also can't stfu about fasces. And implied he wanted him sacked.
So, I don't think his intentions were good, but regardless of intentions, it was wrong to necro-bump. If he had just moved on after he was told it was wrong, it would've been different.
>Okay, but was he OP of that thread?
Yes, and multiple others.
Sorry for being mean anon. But can you get the full context by yourself before hopping in? At least this once? You aren't staff, so there's no problem if you stay out of this. You know?
>>8186
Yeah, I've seen you post similar memes in the books thread. Bussineet Doggo?
Maybe because he isn't an admin?
>>8184
>unless he just did it to be annoying.
He was told necro-bumping the thread was wrong. And then he went on a smug tirade against it. He also can't stfu about fasces. And implied he wanted him sacked.
So, I don't think his intentions were good, but regardless of intentions, it was wrong to necro-bump. If he had just moved on after he was told it was wrong, it would've been different.
>Okay, but was he OP of that thread?
Yes, and multiple others.
Sorry for being mean anon. But can you get the full context by yourself before hopping in? At least this once? You aren't staff, so there's no problem if you stay out of this. You know?
>>8186
Yeah, I've seen you post similar memes in the books thread. Bussineet Doggo?
>>8187
>And implied he wanted him sacked.
Booms implied that he wanted fasces sacked. That's what I meant to say.
>And implied he wanted him sacked.
Booms implied that he wanted fasces sacked. That's what I meant to say.
>>8187
>Maybe because he isn't an admin?
Is it only admins that can ban users or make definitive decisions? I don't think so.
Also, all the staff have admin access now. They have for years.
>Maybe because he isn't an admin?
Is it only admins that can ban users or make definitive decisions? I don't think so.
Also, all the staff have admin access now. They have for years.
>>8187
>not trying to be mean
Thank you.
I mean its kinda hard to have the full context of this; its a converation spamming over many different threads so I don't think there's any problem with my questions so long as Im transparent that I don't have the full picture.
>at least this once
I disagree, I usually have mostly full context in the conversations I engage in.
The reason I involve myself is because, as I said, I do appriciate some of his posts. But the same can be said for Nigel's posts but they can definitely be improved upon so if its just the way he posts not the substance, then its not that big of a deal to me.
>not trying to be mean
Thank you.
I mean its kinda hard to have the full context of this; its a converation spamming over many different threads so I don't think there's any problem with my questions so long as Im transparent that I don't have the full picture.
>at least this once
I disagree, I usually have mostly full context in the conversations I engage in.
The reason I involve myself is because, as I said, I do appriciate some of his posts. But the same can be said for Nigel's posts but they can definitely be improved upon so if its just the way he posts not the substance, then its not that big of a deal to me.
>>8193
They do it through dicksword I think. I'm mostly talking based off the dynamics I've observed these last years.
>>8194
>its a converation spamming over many different threads so I don't think there's any problem with my questions so long as Im transparent that I don't have the full picture.
That's fair.
>I disagree, I usually have mostly full context in the conversations I engage in.
Alright then.
>Nigel
I'd prefer if we keep him out of this.
They do it through dicksword I think. I'm mostly talking based off the dynamics I've observed these last years.
>>8194
>its a converation spamming over many different threads so I don't think there's any problem with my questions so long as Im transparent that I don't have the full picture.
That's fair.
>I disagree, I usually have mostly full context in the conversations I engage in.
Alright then.
>Nigel
I'd prefer if we keep him out of this.
>>8195
>thats fair.
Aw thanks^^
Tho, Im actually gonna do what u said. I might lurk from time to time tho. Both because my computer broke and im phoneposting but also because i said everythimg i wanted to say.
Lets see how this turns out.
>thats fair.
Aw thanks^^
Tho, Im actually gonna do what u said. I might lurk from time to time tho. Both because my computer broke and im phoneposting but also because i said everythimg i wanted to say.
Lets see how this turns out.
>>8188
The mod wanted booms out first, and he did nothing wrong, he has his own threads and didn't messed with other threads up like you people are doing.
Let's face it, this place went to shit when some anons begun to police content like jewtube or jewbook.
The mod wanted booms out first, and he did nothing wrong, he has his own threads and didn't messed with other threads up like you people are doing.
Let's face it, this place went to shit when some anons begun to police content like jewtube or jewbook.
>8197
>Bunch of accusations without any backing or elaboration
Average boomer post.
>>8196
Sorry for mistaking you fams.
>Bunch of accusations without any backing or elaboration
Average boomer post.
>>8196
Sorry for mistaking you fams.
>>8201
>Bunch of accusations without any backing or elaboration
I'm >>8197
I don't know what the fuck is wrong with you people, you already got a dead site and shit on the only poster begging to post because muh whatever excuse to pull out your ass. Every time I drop by there are these threads going on turning off any lurker.
Pupper, get real, if shutting down /mlpol/ is your wish then do it, but you cannot play with users that want to post while Fasces are blocking them.
The toxicity here is off the scale. These niggers don't want you to post and as you were saying post nothing. Fucking unreal.
Booms better go other place, they are toying with you and this shitshow never couldn't happen if was not allowed by Pupper.
>Bunch of accusations without any backing or elaboration
I'm >>8197
I don't know what the fuck is wrong with you people, you already got a dead site and shit on the only poster begging to post because muh whatever excuse to pull out your ass. Every time I drop by there are these threads going on turning off any lurker.
Pupper, get real, if shutting down /mlpol/ is your wish then do it, but you cannot play with users that want to post while Fasces are blocking them.
The toxicity here is off the scale. These niggers don't want you to post and as you were saying post nothing. Fucking unreal.
Booms better go other place, they are toying with you and this shitshow never couldn't happen if was not allowed by Pupper.
>>8202
What's wrong with us? I don't know what's wrong with (You)! How can you see a single post from that guy and see anything positive? Nothing he's done here is worth anything. And if you can't see it then you weren't around when the site actually had a purpose and motivation. All he ever does is spam articles he hasn't read, dump low end "I'm smarter than you nanna nanna boo boo" bottomtext memes, and proclaim the superiority of his beliefs without ever actually arguing his case. If any of these three things is questioned, he moves on to do one of the other two, ad nauseum.
This site used to have some semblance of order. I don't care how often posts are made as long as there's at least one decent conversation a week, but instead all I ever see is pissing contests from our lovely guest from Telegram or DnD campaigns from the staff. /ub/'s got about as much self improvement advice as Boom's meme folder does by now. /sp/ is indistinguishable from /mlpol/. All that any of us have actually done is regurgitate talking points and memes from before the site was founded, which for some reason warrants creating new thread after new thread which we promise isn't spam you guys.
What's wrong with us? I don't know what's wrong with (You)! How can you see a single post from that guy and see anything positive? Nothing he's done here is worth anything. And if you can't see it then you weren't around when the site actually had a purpose and motivation. All he ever does is spam articles he hasn't read, dump low end "I'm smarter than you nanna nanna boo boo" bottomtext memes, and proclaim the superiority of his beliefs without ever actually arguing his case. If any of these three things is questioned, he moves on to do one of the other two, ad nauseum.
This site used to have some semblance of order. I don't care how often posts are made as long as there's at least one decent conversation a week, but instead all I ever see is pissing contests from our lovely guest from Telegram or DnD campaigns from the staff. /ub/'s got about as much self improvement advice as Boom's meme folder does by now. /sp/ is indistinguishable from /mlpol/. All that any of us have actually done is regurgitate talking points and memes from before the site was founded, which for some reason warrants creating new thread after new thread which we promise isn't spam you guys.
>>8202
>What the fuck is wrong with you people
Maybe we just wanted a fucking conversation and not someone being a shitty bot.
Maybe instead of denial and Reeeeing about counter points or even basic observations, but maybe actual bants.
But no.
No when some makes any kind of interactive statement it'll be shut it down by Mr Hotshot himself 50k posts a second.
Good gracious who can talk to the rabble who doesn't post 50 thousand times a second. No just give them the picure from a smug folder that'll have to do.
Much too important to even attempt to give any others due time and effort too many 50k posts and so little time.
Why without those 50 thousand posts oozing from every thread and interaction how else would anyone possibly interact online.
Inconceivable.
Those peasants arguing about trifles like 'coherent discussion' or 'what the fuck this is retarded explain yourself' truthfully they can't even begin to grasp the Fifty thousand post per second. They'll just need to watch others five hour video diatribe and the playlist and that playlist's playlist and if they can't even comprehend his genius let alone my own 50k genius they ought to just make do with second best.
Oh? The argument makes no sense? Well just watch it again idiot.
Still is this so called big retard energy? Well checkmate reverse uno it you who has the big retard energy. I'm 50 thousand posts ahead of you.
Ah ha trying to argue that one of my posts makes no sense? I have twenty more checkmate but with checkers.
Go ahead I'm very busy with my heady 50k posts per second per second so little peon tell me what those silly /mlpopol/'s think about this. Can't? Because you arn't an admin or mod.
C H E C K M A T E.
Silly little egotripping narcissists it is I who has the biggest 50 thousands per thousands per second posts who make up this website. It I the 50k posts Anon who make up the life blood and user count.
Without me the 50 thousand gorrillion posts a day anon you'd be left with your twenty posts every half week. How absolutely dreadful would that be.
For you see I the 50 grand anon will enlighten you all by replying to myself and others as if I'm different other 50 grand anons.
Yes bask in my glory. How do you even know all those other 50 thosand posts resemble each other. How could anyone possibly figure out patterns of behavior, for my color ID is different!
Foolish peons did you not witness the terrifying shock of losing the 50 thousand posts per picosecond in which I so graciously left for you all to stew in your lacking of 50 thousand posts per plank-second.
What's that? Talking with the rabble ugh disgusting, I must leave to go puke. Puke hard, I do these 50 thousand pukes for you.
Finally one of the little people outright made a post saying that one of my 50 thosand posts per second³ is decent and they looked at it. Those other ungrateful mental midgets they wouldn't even begin to survive if I began to debate them in any capacity.
This whole site something is wrong about it, ah of course, it's not centered around I the 50 thousand posts anon. They ought to rejoice it is I who brings threads and this site to life.
How could anyone possibly live without my 50k posts.
Quality? Hahaha quantity is good enough for them that's the most important quality.
Incorrect post? Hahaha surely you've at least read my 50k other posts supporting what I've already assured is true.
My 50k posts are tingling I must go and absorb an image from Farcebook and post it on this backwater site.
Then I go eat a caviar cake, when these troglodytes forget I'll be there with my 50 thosands of posts.
>What the fuck is wrong with you people
Maybe we just wanted a fucking conversation and not someone being a shitty bot.
Maybe instead of denial and Reeeeing about counter points or even basic observations, but maybe actual bants.
But no.
No when some makes any kind of interactive statement it'll be shut it down by Mr Hotshot himself 50k posts a second.
Good gracious who can talk to the rabble who doesn't post 50 thousand times a second. No just give them the picure from a smug folder that'll have to do.
Much too important to even attempt to give any others due time and effort too many 50k posts and so little time.
Why without those 50 thousand posts oozing from every thread and interaction how else would anyone possibly interact online.
Inconceivable.
Those peasants arguing about trifles like 'coherent discussion' or 'what the fuck this is retarded explain yourself' truthfully they can't even begin to grasp the Fifty thousand post per second. They'll just need to watch others five hour video diatribe and the playlist and that playlist's playlist and if they can't even comprehend his genius let alone my own 50k genius they ought to just make do with second best.
Oh? The argument makes no sense? Well just watch it again idiot.
Still is this so called big retard energy? Well checkmate reverse uno it you who has the big retard energy. I'm 50 thousand posts ahead of you.
Ah ha trying to argue that one of my posts makes no sense? I have twenty more checkmate but with checkers.
Go ahead I'm very busy with my heady 50k posts per second per second so little peon tell me what those silly /mlpopol/'s think about this. Can't? Because you arn't an admin or mod.
C H E C K M A T E.
Silly little egotripping narcissists it is I who has the biggest 50 thousands per thousands per second posts who make up this website. It I the 50k posts Anon who make up the life blood and user count.
Without me the 50 thousand gorrillion posts a day anon you'd be left with your twenty posts every half week. How absolutely dreadful would that be.
For you see I the 50 grand anon will enlighten you all by replying to myself and others as if I'm different other 50 grand anons.
Yes bask in my glory. How do you even know all those other 50 thosand posts resemble each other. How could anyone possibly figure out patterns of behavior, for my color ID is different!
Foolish peons did you not witness the terrifying shock of losing the 50 thousand posts per picosecond in which I so graciously left for you all to stew in your lacking of 50 thousand posts per plank-second.
What's that? Talking with the rabble ugh disgusting, I must leave to go puke. Puke hard, I do these 50 thousand pukes for you.
Finally one of the little people outright made a post saying that one of my 50 thosand posts per second³ is decent and they looked at it. Those other ungrateful mental midgets they wouldn't even begin to survive if I began to debate them in any capacity.
This whole site something is wrong about it, ah of course, it's not centered around I the 50 thousand posts anon. They ought to rejoice it is I who brings threads and this site to life.
How could anyone possibly live without my 50k posts.
Quality? Hahaha quantity is good enough for them that's the most important quality.
Incorrect post? Hahaha surely you've at least read my 50k other posts supporting what I've already assured is true.
My 50k posts are tingling I must go and absorb an image from Farcebook and post it on this backwater site.
Then I go eat a caviar cake, when these troglodytes forget I'll be there with my 50 thosands of posts.
>>8162
>>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8165
>blah blah blah blah blah
>Missed the point puts that wordy post in a folder.
>Surely none of any of these posts couldn't actually impact me.
Here's the foreshadow. The things about to occur. It will. It's so quotable. You wanted responses but not any discussion. Consider it a heads up a change course pretty please. A small taste of what is to come.
>>8202
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8197
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8175
>blah blah blah blah blah
Advice? Pfft just save it and dump it.
>>8170
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8168
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8158
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8154
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8165
>blah blah blah blah blah
>Missed the point puts that wordy post in a folder.
>Surely none of any of these posts couldn't actually impact me.
Here's the foreshadow. The things about to occur. It will. It's so quotable. You wanted responses but not any discussion. Consider it a heads up a change course pretty please. A small taste of what is to come.
>>8202
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8197
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8175
>blah blah blah blah blah
Advice? Pfft just save it and dump it.
>>8170
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8168
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8158
>blah blah blah blah blah
>>8154
>blah blah blah blah blah
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-461] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
461 replies | 149 files | 92 UUIDs | Page 1