Could /mlpol/ Benefit From A Blue Pony Board?
Posters in this community have brought of various ways to make the site more attractive to horsefuckers and content creators. One reccomended idea has been to introduce a blue board for pony content.
Is this idea worth trying?
What could the benefits be?
Express your thoughts.
Continued from the discussion in the Roe v Wade Thread >>>/mlpol/344423 →
/qa/ - Questions and Answers
Keeping the community together by giving you a voice
200 replies and 85 files omitted.
>tfw 'last 50 posts' isn't enough
Oh boy...
Oh boy...
>>6931
Hail!
>>6934
>Well according to the ancient furry chart, ponies fall into the "you sick bastard" category, so i think you're safe as long as you're not into satyr.
I'm familiar with it, such as this >pic related image. Personally, Centaurs are more my kind of thing.
>Jokes aside, it's just weird to fuck a horse anon, i guess it's ok to fantasize about it but please don't take the chance if it ever presents itself, you'd be just sticking your dick in an animal, in no way would people see you as anything but a zoophile.
>Implying i haven't already contemplated the idea countless times or lost my wizard virginity to a pretty pony mare
Kek, you couldn't have made a more grand assumption of my equine-mancy powers Mr Anonymous.
>Or just do it, like, it's not like i care that much honestly, i'm being dramatic here.
In all seriousness, i have produced some videos of me fucking ponies over on 8chan's(.moe) /zoo/ if that disgusts you even more. It won't be hard to find them since i use a similar posting style as always.
>I like cats but not sexually, i don't really have much of a non-ironical interest in eroticism.
Then you are spared from this excessive desire for lust which i posses, felines are not as pleasing as the equines in my eyes but i have felt a she cat's pussy before when she was in season, yet my sexual cravings did not feel inclined to arousal from the deed i had done.
P.S.
Video 3 is originally from my post that was almost 3 years ago now and still remains in the archivesdespite a few others getting deleted for "no actual horsefucking." https://mlpol.net/mlpol/archive/223714#230559
[Read more] Hail!
>>6934
>Well according to the ancient furry chart, ponies fall into the "you sick bastard" category, so i think you're safe as long as you're not into satyr.
I'm familiar with it, such as this >pic related image. Personally, Centaurs are more my kind of thing.
>Jokes aside, it's just weird to fuck a horse anon, i guess it's ok to fantasize about it but please don't take the chance if it ever presents itself, you'd be just sticking your dick in an animal, in no way would people see you as anything but a zoophile.
>Implying i haven't already contemplated the idea countless times or lost my wizard virginity to a pretty pony mare
Kek, you couldn't have made a more grand assumption of my equine-mancy powers Mr Anonymous.
>Or just do it, like, it's not like i care that much honestly, i'm being dramatic here.
In all seriousness, i have produced some videos of me fucking ponies over on 8chan's(.moe) /zoo/ if that disgusts you even more. It won't be hard to find them since i use a similar posting style as always.
>I like cats but not sexually, i don't really have much of a non-ironical interest in eroticism.
Then you are spared from this excessive desire for lust which i posses, felines are not as pleasing as the equines in my eyes but i have felt a she cat's pussy before when she was in season, yet my sexual cravings did not feel inclined to arousal from the deed i had done.
P.S.
Video 3 is originally from my post that was almost 3 years ago now and still remains in the archivesdespite a few others getting deleted for "no actual horsefucking." https://mlpol.net/mlpol/archive/223714#230559
1652934774.png (379.8 KB, 600x600, C78DE87A7882F202BE400F9CCD8BF6DD-388921.png)
1652947703_1.png (66.7 KB, 1366x768, Screenshot_20220519_040305.png)
OP is doing it all by himself.
Polacks retreated, I am waiting for the ponies.
Polacks retreated, I am waiting for the ponies.
1652955900.jpg (562.2 KB, 1200x1052, 7A738ED6-2EF6-4596-9772-58FFA4D19A5A.jpg)
>>6963
>If I passed on the responsibility, why am I still here, making the case to users in public instead of in a private dicksword?
because you left that team of sad sucks but instead of doing anything about it you are still here seething openly. go build your own lunar lander. I came here for /pol/ related reasons and can't resist digging at the mods every now and then for being faggots, but I also don't pretend I'm somehow better than them or that they owe me something.
if you want to be all high and mighty at me, you should have kept being a mod even if these assholes annoyed you, but instead you trippled down and made yourself suck 3 times the cocks they do.
>>6966
Like I said many times, It wasn't my idea to make this thread, even if I think you are wrong. I know the mods were not on board.
>>6970
you are correct that there is value in coming here, I would just argue there is very little value for horsefuckers.
>>6974
>its more intellectually stimulating than most of the shit you find on the internet these days
the majority of the content on /mlpol/ is shit someone found on a news or blog and reposted here.
[Read more] >If I passed on the responsibility, why am I still here, making the case to users in public instead of in a private dicksword?
because you left that team of sad sucks but instead of doing anything about it you are still here seething openly. go build your own lunar lander. I came here for /pol/ related reasons and can't resist digging at the mods every now and then for being faggots, but I also don't pretend I'm somehow better than them or that they owe me something.
if you want to be all high and mighty at me, you should have kept being a mod even if these assholes annoyed you, but instead you trippled down and made yourself suck 3 times the cocks they do.
>>6966
Like I said many times, It wasn't my idea to make this thread, even if I think you are wrong. I know the mods were not on board.
>>6970
you are correct that there is value in coming here, I would just argue there is very little value for horsefuckers.
>>6974
>its more intellectually stimulating than most of the shit you find on the internet these days
the majority of the content on /mlpol/ is shit someone found on a news or blog and reposted here.
1652957731.png (691.1 KB, 3189x3000, d59ff2c0177702696497183cd8b24260.png)
>>7007
>you dodnt do what I think you should do, and dont think what I think you should think, so ur gay
Stunningly well thought out
>you dodnt do what I think you should do, and dont think what I think you should think, so ur gay
Stunningly well thought out
1652957925_1.png (131.8 KB, 640x360, 6FD18E5239C3A8BB7BDE1681C44E35B5-134993[1].png)
![6FD18E5239C3A8BB7BDE1681C44E35B5-134993[1].png](/images/src/6FD18E5239C3A8BB7BDE1681C44E35B5-134993.png)
1652957925_2.png (376.2 KB, 900x900, D2E0BF7E2023FEBEA5559424B61A4714-385244[1].png)
![D2E0BF7E2023FEBEA5559424B61A4714-385244[1].png](/images/src/D2E0BF7E2023FEBEA5559424B61A4714-385244.png)
>>6975
Oh I see. so people are skating around the AI learning bot by hotlinking and embedding.
>>6977
I agree that the mods don't engage the community much but I also am different in thinking that I don't see why they really have to. Anons here don't pay to use the site, they do, and if they want to be king faggot, nobody should have a right to tell them not to be.
>Really? I got you lot to do a bunch of things you refused while on staff. I suppose thats inefficacy?
Everything comes from somewhere, you didn't get someone to do something by being a complaining faggot, you got someone to do something by making them perceive you as a complaining faggot, lowering your social credit. If you want to call drawing on that credit "efficient" you've got to be fucking joking.
>>6985
>I still don't understand what case you're trying to make. What exactly do you want staff to do? The board is for whites and blacks; if more people birth blacks then we're going to have more blacks, if more people birth whites then we have more whites. If you don't like the ratio of black to white, then make more whites.
Since you don't seem to understanding the basic premise at all I'll once again, not that I haven't 3 times in this thread already, make the comparison to white flight.
>What do you want staff to do for you exactly? Do you want us to ban political threads? Add some kind of Twitter-style shadow algorithm that moves pony threads to the top of the page regardless of which threads are actually getting bumped? >Frankly I don't care for a lot of the low-effort posts that are just news articles or boomer memes either, but the community sets the content, all we do is provide the space and delete spam.
I already made it clear what I think should be done two years ago. a new board that's for horse only, I can only imagine that other fucking lunatic has you so tilted you didn't read any of this thread and maybe even tuned out any discussion from the staff, but in any case how you got absolutely no information from the original post when it's blatantly clear what is being suggested is beyond confusing as fuck.
Again, the only thing I ever suggested was that you guys make a pony board so that people fed up with the mlp on 4chan could come here. That opportunity is largely passed and if you made one now I wouldn't be mad but I think the people who immediately liked my idea and made this thread probably are a bit naive in how likely we are to see a result when /mlp/ is now having regular and exciting cons twice a year. Frankly I'm abjectly confused. I don't understand how anyone can think that this is a fun experiance for horsefuckery. It's a great place to speak my mind and post horse reaction images when shitposting about politics. but the horse content is near non existant and the reason it is is because the idea that combining the demographics of both boards would favor both equally was wrong to begin with.
Do I think mlpol needs to change? no. I never said we needed to modify any of the rules of that board. Do I think it's obvious who's content is being pushed off the board? yes. Acting like mlpol is a pony board is naive at best. It's /pol/ without GR 15.
>This is just stupid
The rest of your retarded post is significantly lowering my desire to engage with you at all. maybe I was speaking too soon when I said that other anon was tripple your faggotry, maybe hes just double, or one and a half. Literally all of the first half of this post is nothing but your inability to listen to ANYONE in this thread, let alone me. Even people who make their cases politely or have patience rather than a salty fucker who's been down this path with you faggots and already knew your answer from the start. I'm not reading the rest of it.
>>6987
Its hilarious you nominated the guy who seems to be the least suited to listening to anyone at all.
>>6999
>but this is not such a venue
this is the only part of this ocean of feces I will reply to.
This is not your venue to seeth over the mods. this is someone else's thread. not even mine, and the only reason I'm in it is because they personally requested I defend the idea in their stead.
[Read more] Oh I see. so people are skating around the AI learning bot by hotlinking and embedding.
>>6977
I agree that the mods don't engage the community much but I also am different in thinking that I don't see why they really have to. Anons here don't pay to use the site, they do, and if they want to be king faggot, nobody should have a right to tell them not to be.
>Really? I got you lot to do a bunch of things you refused while on staff. I suppose thats inefficacy?
Everything comes from somewhere, you didn't get someone to do something by being a complaining faggot, you got someone to do something by making them perceive you as a complaining faggot, lowering your social credit. If you want to call drawing on that credit "efficient" you've got to be fucking joking.
>>6985
>I still don't understand what case you're trying to make. What exactly do you want staff to do? The board is for whites and blacks; if more people birth blacks then we're going to have more blacks, if more people birth whites then we have more whites. If you don't like the ratio of black to white, then make more whites.
Since you don't seem to understanding the basic premise at all I'll once again, not that I haven't 3 times in this thread already, make the comparison to white flight.
>What do you want staff to do for you exactly? Do you want us to ban political threads? Add some kind of Twitter-style shadow algorithm that moves pony threads to the top of the page regardless of which threads are actually getting bumped? >Frankly I don't care for a lot of the low-effort posts that are just news articles or boomer memes either, but the community sets the content, all we do is provide the space and delete spam.
I already made it clear what I think should be done two years ago. a new board that's for horse only, I can only imagine that other fucking lunatic has you so tilted you didn't read any of this thread and maybe even tuned out any discussion from the staff, but in any case how you got absolutely no information from the original post when it's blatantly clear what is being suggested is beyond confusing as fuck.
Again, the only thing I ever suggested was that you guys make a pony board so that people fed up with the mlp on 4chan could come here. That opportunity is largely passed and if you made one now I wouldn't be mad but I think the people who immediately liked my idea and made this thread probably are a bit naive in how likely we are to see a result when /mlp/ is now having regular and exciting cons twice a year. Frankly I'm abjectly confused. I don't understand how anyone can think that this is a fun experiance for horsefuckery. It's a great place to speak my mind and post horse reaction images when shitposting about politics. but the horse content is near non existant and the reason it is is because the idea that combining the demographics of both boards would favor both equally was wrong to begin with.
Do I think mlpol needs to change? no. I never said we needed to modify any of the rules of that board. Do I think it's obvious who's content is being pushed off the board? yes. Acting like mlpol is a pony board is naive at best. It's /pol/ without GR 15.
>This is just stupid
The rest of your retarded post is significantly lowering my desire to engage with you at all. maybe I was speaking too soon when I said that other anon was tripple your faggotry, maybe hes just double, or one and a half. Literally all of the first half of this post is nothing but your inability to listen to ANYONE in this thread, let alone me. Even people who make their cases politely or have patience rather than a salty fucker who's been down this path with you faggots and already knew your answer from the start. I'm not reading the rest of it.
>>6987
Its hilarious you nominated the guy who seems to be the least suited to listening to anyone at all.
>>6999
>but this is not such a venue
this is the only part of this ocean of feces I will reply to.
This is not your venue to seeth over the mods. this is someone else's thread. not even mine, and the only reason I'm in it is because they personally requested I defend the idea in their stead.
>>7011
>Its hilarious you nominated the guy who seems to be the least suited to listening to anyone at all
>seems
I'll counter that his candor in and out of threads/the board speaks to his credibility, especially considering the alternatives. Moreover, he's the face of Football, hes the most visible staff member given movie night et al. Hes not the PERFECT choice, but that wasn't the point of suggesting him. Is there a more suitable alternative?
>Its hilarious you nominated the guy who seems to be the least suited to listening to anyone at all
>seems
I'll counter that his candor in and out of threads/the board speaks to his credibility, especially considering the alternatives. Moreover, he's the face of Football, hes the most visible staff member given movie night et al. Hes not the PERFECT choice, but that wasn't the point of suggesting him. Is there a more suitable alternative?
>>7012
I have no preference if we're talking about outcomes because there wont be any but if I was forced to pick one I'd go with lotus, who can and has at least pretended to listen to what someone else is saying before saying no anyway, unlike Elway or you. Pupper and atlas are mods I have had little to no contact with. Either way I think it's pretty clear when a admin barges in to seethe without even reading the op it looks about as good as a sour grapes faggot who left the team but wont stop loitering around and complaining about how hes not on the team anymore in someone else's thread.
I have no preference if we're talking about outcomes because there wont be any but if I was forced to pick one I'd go with lotus, who can and has at least pretended to listen to what someone else is saying before saying no anyway, unlike Elway or you. Pupper and atlas are mods I have had little to no contact with. Either way I think it's pretty clear when a admin barges in to seethe without even reading the op it looks about as good as a sour grapes faggot who left the team but wont stop loitering around and complaining about how hes not on the team anymore in someone else's thread.
>>7013
So your position is, upon leaving staff, I should have exhiled myself from the site?
I agree, Elway doesnt have a perfect record, and I'll admit that I can't validate my position on Lotus without publishing materials that would be grounds for censure.
I'll suffice to say that of the two, Elway strikes a far better compromise between libertarian vs. authoritarian, though I appreciate how dismissible that statement is.
>didnt read the OP
lol false. I guess in your mind, someone saying 'no' to a series of yes or no questions (which IMO the answer to those questions, collectively, IS no) equates to being ignorant of the proposal?
So your position is, upon leaving staff, I should have exhiled myself from the site?
I agree, Elway doesnt have a perfect record, and I'll admit that I can't validate my position on Lotus without publishing materials that would be grounds for censure.
I'll suffice to say that of the two, Elway strikes a far better compromise between libertarian vs. authoritarian, though I appreciate how dismissible that statement is.
>didnt read the OP
lol false. I guess in your mind, someone saying 'no' to a series of yes or no questions (which IMO the answer to those questions, collectively, IS no) equates to being ignorant of the proposal?
>>7014
the point is that they probably only target actual cp to avoid false positives, and therefore these embedded links get around that.
the point is that they probably only target actual cp to avoid false positives, and therefore these embedded links get around that.
>>6939
Anyway, I dunno if it's the right call but I think at this point I have to reply to this and hopefully make my last post on this topic. Based on the overwhelming shitposting here, and the abject indifference of not just one but two mods, each more indifferent and hostile than the last.
They do not fucking care, man. Nevermind the fact that I went to them when it was time to strike and they still said no, they don't even agree that metal can be hot, and if it could, they cant fathom a reason for striking. You would be better off making your own numlp than wasting your time trying to suck off these idiots. Honestly if you are who I think you are though you're already doing a lot as it is and I think it's working and am fully behind it, even if the venue for it sucks. Trying to get these people to care about the horse community is a waste of time. They don't strike when the irons hot because they don't fucking care. They don't even know the state of /mlp/ over 2 years, let alone what's going on there recently. It's extremely telling that they keep trying to frame this as though we are struggling to get people to post pony. Now that G% drama is ogre I have a captive audience on /mlp/ due to cons. soap anon is selling soap. and I'm sure you or anyone could have a fucking blast over there running your own panels and drinking in the OC. we don't have to stop using this website but trying to get them to understand the horse community is a huge waste of fucking time. I'm not anything more than 7 charisma internet retard but I gave the idea my best shot of explanation and defense. It's absolutely crystal clear that the latest people involved didn't even read your opening post. I'd rather work on my projects than spend hours screaming at mods who don't even spend a second glancing at your polite OP before they fly off the handle.
[Read more] Anyway, I dunno if it's the right call but I think at this point I have to reply to this and hopefully make my last post on this topic. Based on the overwhelming shitposting here, and the abject indifference of not just one but two mods, each more indifferent and hostile than the last.
They do not fucking care, man. Nevermind the fact that I went to them when it was time to strike and they still said no, they don't even agree that metal can be hot, and if it could, they cant fathom a reason for striking. You would be better off making your own numlp than wasting your time trying to suck off these idiots. Honestly if you are who I think you are though you're already doing a lot as it is and I think it's working and am fully behind it, even if the venue for it sucks. Trying to get these people to care about the horse community is a waste of time. They don't strike when the irons hot because they don't fucking care. They don't even know the state of /mlp/ over 2 years, let alone what's going on there recently. It's extremely telling that they keep trying to frame this as though we are struggling to get people to post pony. Now that G% drama is ogre I have a captive audience on /mlp/ due to cons. soap anon is selling soap. and I'm sure you or anyone could have a fucking blast over there running your own panels and drinking in the OC. we don't have to stop using this website but trying to get them to understand the horse community is a huge waste of fucking time. I'm not anything more than 7 charisma internet retard but I gave the idea my best shot of explanation and defense. It's absolutely crystal clear that the latest people involved didn't even read your opening post. I'd rather work on my projects than spend hours screaming at mods who don't even spend a second glancing at your polite OP before they fly off the handle.
>>7004
I don't find it disgusting, when i was like 15-16 and my mind was full of pony i would totally fuck a horse, given the chance.
Up until my 19's i think i was still like that, but i sort of just grew out of it and after many interactions with disgusting furries and zoosadists, the idea of sticking it into a horse or any other animal is repelling.
Welp, have your fun anon, everyone has their tastes and I'm just some muscular dude that has cute bunny stickers on his wallet so who am i to judge.
I don't find it disgusting, when i was like 15-16 and my mind was full of pony i would totally fuck a horse, given the chance.
Up until my 19's i think i was still like that, but i sort of just grew out of it and after many interactions with disgusting furries and zoosadists, the idea of sticking it into a horse or any other animal is repelling.
Welp, have your fun anon, everyone has their tastes and I'm just some muscular dude that has cute bunny stickers on his wallet so who am i to judge.
>>7017
God i'm not even gonna read your posts anymore, shut the fuck up half of your posts don't even make a fucking sense anymore, your arguments are all over the place and it is obvious you don't have a clear focus on what you want.
Just leave, this post >>6986 >>6987
Is the best post you made, you exposed your point in a sensible and civil manner without looking like an absolute derranged madman.
You should have left it at that, because it seems as soon as that post ended you resumed your tale of posting pure nonsense.
You're like this picture, at first glance it seems to make sense, but when you look closely you realize it makes no fucking sense.
God i'm not even gonna read your posts anymore, shut the fuck up half of your posts don't even make a fucking sense anymore, your arguments are all over the place and it is obvious you don't have a clear focus on what you want.
Just leave, this post >>6986 >>6987
Is the best post you made, you exposed your point in a sensible and civil manner without looking like an absolute derranged madman.
You should have left it at that, because it seems as soon as that post ended you resumed your tale of posting pure nonsense.
You're like this picture, at first glance it seems to make sense, but when you look closely you realize it makes no fucking sense.
>>7017
>They won't strike when the iron's hot
OK, you've caught my attention there.
I remember back in 2019 when the leaks happened and there was this big fuzz about diverstria and stoned golly.
I tried to get poners from this site onboard. I mean, it was this shitstorm that gave Aryanne a permanent foothold on /mlp/
Buuut...mods here deleted everything, cuz spam...
Tried to appeal alongside the other anons, telling them how important this was and how there wouldn't be another chance.
I had to wait until the episode actually aired to keep pushing.
Which wasn't exactly easy anyways,
With the choking apathy of the userbase here.
I eventually managed to get them to care, but I won't forget how this was almost ruined by apathy and inaction, both from the userbase and particularly from staff.
So, you got my support if you need anything with your stuff and if I happen to have spare time on me to help.
[Read more] >They won't strike when the iron's hot
OK, you've caught my attention there.
I remember back in 2019 when the leaks happened and there was this big fuzz about diverstria and stoned golly.
I tried to get poners from this site onboard. I mean, it was this shitstorm that gave Aryanne a permanent foothold on /mlp/
Buuut...mods here deleted everything, cuz spam...
Tried to appeal alongside the other anons, telling them how important this was and how there wouldn't be another chance.
I had to wait until the episode actually aired to keep pushing.
Which wasn't exactly easy anyways,
With the choking apathy of the userbase here.
I eventually managed to get them to care, but I won't forget how this was almost ruined by apathy and inaction, both from the userbase and particularly from staff.
So, you got my support if you need anything with your stuff and if I happen to have spare time on me to help.
>>7019
One gets what one gives anon, since the sincere request post was the only post that hasnt smelled of contempt.
I would like to add a Zero step to my breakdown though, and this can be done NOW.
Consult someone with PR knowledge and experience.
One gets what one gives anon, since the sincere request post was the only post that hasnt smelled of contempt.
I would like to add a Zero step to my breakdown though, and this can be done NOW.
Consult someone with PR knowledge and experience.
>>7019
He's right tho, you niggers are utterly disconnected from reality when it comes to /mlp/. It takes an ungodly, byzantine effort to get to care in the slightest.
You've been like this for years now, and the events that transpired ever since the ending leaked, proves that we were right.
He's right tho, you niggers are utterly disconnected from reality when it comes to /mlp/. It takes an ungodly, byzantine effort to get to care in the slightest.
You've been like this for years now, and the events that transpired ever since the ending leaked, proves that we were right.
1652976796.png (321.2 KB, 529x599, 3FAB918F-C292-46E9-9436-37DE056D4948.png)
>>7017
What more do you want from us, aside from “make a new board immediately without any more discussion”? You have opened the question for public debate. I have listened to the arguments you’ve made, I have given my personal opinion, and you have responded to my statement of my opinion with a rebuttal of your own. The issue has been brought up and discussed by staff within the staff communication channel, and the general opinion has been published here. Many users have also made comments.
The issue is currently up to a poll posted in >>6985, and staff are waiting to see the results if that as well as community discussion to determine if we will make a new board, and if a new board is made, what that board will be named and what the rules will be. Literally what more could you possibly ask for? If this were an actual political issue like a region wanting independence, the government putting the issue to a referendum would be considered a tremendous victory for the movants. See the quebecois independence-movement in Canada, the Scottish independent movement, and the “Leave” campaign in Britain for examples of IRL movements that obtained referendums, and contrast the Spanish crackdown on the “illegal” Catalonian independence vote for an example of a central government denying a vote.
Literally what else do you want? Staff has posed the question of “what should this new board be named” and other users have engaged in that question. Users have asked the question of whether any new board should be a blue board. Maybe you have engaged in those discussions and maybe you haven’t, but the point is that there is discussion to be had amongst the users on the topic.
But instead of jumping for joy that the issue is up for popular vote and user discussion, and persuading users that they should post and vote in favor of the new idea, you bitch about staff and complain that we don’t use 4chan, the website we created this website to get away from. Bitch, Please. We are not going to suck your dick.
[Read more] What more do you want from us, aside from “make a new board immediately without any more discussion”? You have opened the question for public debate. I have listened to the arguments you’ve made, I have given my personal opinion, and you have responded to my statement of my opinion with a rebuttal of your own. The issue has been brought up and discussed by staff within the staff communication channel, and the general opinion has been published here. Many users have also made comments.
The issue is currently up to a poll posted in >>6985, and staff are waiting to see the results if that as well as community discussion to determine if we will make a new board, and if a new board is made, what that board will be named and what the rules will be. Literally what more could you possibly ask for? If this were an actual political issue like a region wanting independence, the government putting the issue to a referendum would be considered a tremendous victory for the movants. See the quebecois independence-movement in Canada, the Scottish independent movement, and the “Leave” campaign in Britain for examples of IRL movements that obtained referendums, and contrast the Spanish crackdown on the “illegal” Catalonian independence vote for an example of a central government denying a vote.
Literally what else do you want? Staff has posed the question of “what should this new board be named” and other users have engaged in that question. Users have asked the question of whether any new board should be a blue board. Maybe you have engaged in those discussions and maybe you haven’t, but the point is that there is discussion to be had amongst the users on the topic.
But instead of jumping for joy that the issue is up for popular vote and user discussion, and persuading users that they should post and vote in favor of the new idea, you bitch about staff and complain that we don’t use 4chan, the website we created this website to get away from. Bitch, Please. We are not going to suck your dick.
1652979408.png (179.0 KB, 765x1045, 7409C358-72FB-4926-B61F-B2F92D9AC3CB.png)
>>7020
>buut...mods here deleted everything, cuz spam...
No. The leaks were not deleted because of “spam.” The reason they were deleted was because an error in the way the text was spoilered. The post contained major spoilers for season 9, and such spoilers need to be, well, spoilered. However, green text was showing through the black such that just glancing at the OP post caused those spoilers to be visible. I deleted the post with a warning as to the reason why. All that had to happen was to correct the post, such as by removing the arrows. For some reason the OP chose not to post again.
>Tried to appeal alongside the other anons, telling them how important this was and how there wouldn't be another chance.
I don’t recall anyone whatsoever making any appeal or anything about the leaks. All that needed to be done was to repost the same text with out the green text, but it was not resubmitted.
>buut...mods here deleted everything, cuz spam...
No. The leaks were not deleted because of “spam.” The reason they were deleted was because an error in the way the text was spoilered. The post contained major spoilers for season 9, and such spoilers need to be, well, spoilered. However, green text was showing through the black such that just glancing at the OP post caused those spoilers to be visible. I deleted the post with a warning as to the reason why. All that had to happen was to correct the post, such as by removing the arrows. For some reason the OP chose not to post again.
>Tried to appeal alongside the other anons, telling them how important this was and how there wouldn't be another chance.
I don’t recall anyone whatsoever making any appeal or anything about the leaks. All that needed to be done was to repost the same text with out the green text, but it was not resubmitted.
>>7022
I'm not talking about /mlp/, i can't give two fucks about this whole discussion about the traffic on the site, it is pointless to discuss it and i don't plan to repeat my previous post addressing why that is.
I'm just policing shitty arguments and faulty logic because it pleases me to read a good argument with some good back and forth between two parties.
And honestly most of the shit that's been posted here simply makes 0 sense.
I'm not talking about /mlp/, i can't give two fucks about this whole discussion about the traffic on the site, it is pointless to discuss it and i don't plan to repeat my previous post addressing why that is.
I'm just policing shitty arguments and faulty logic because it pleases me to read a good argument with some good back and forth between two parties.
And honestly most of the shit that's been posted here simply makes 0 sense.
1652981289.jpg (274.4 KB, 569x900, lovely_weather_by_jcharlesmachiavelli-d4hl2x3.jpg)
>>7022
>>7020
Honestly i don't understand your guy's constant obsession with /mlp/, it's almost like you're putting it in some autistic pedestral of what a chan should be.
mlp is a depressing place filled with autists, like all of 4chan.
Non-4chan internet is filled with underage and normies, so that's also not very nice.
I'm gonna drop a fat black pill down your throat: Mlpol will never have considerable traffic because the concept itself is autistic and idiotic.
Mention /pol/ to anyone and the only thing you will get is "Oh, the edgy neonazi board?"
Mention /mlp/ to someone and they will either say something about pedos or think you're a weirdo.
Wow, what a surprise, when you mix vomit and shit together you get something even more disgusting.
Yeah sure, it worked for a while, under very special circumstances, but once that ended the site was left with a small userbase posting content of more or less quality and little to no outside traffic.
And it's not surprising at all.
Most small chans you will find out there, with a few exceptions like crystal cafe and lolcow farms, will have little to no traffic because they are unknown or simply small and kind of dead.
Add to that the fact that, as i said earlier, mlpol is disgusting for the average person and boom, you got a very slow site.
Face it, /mlp/ hates this place, they know it exists and they don't give three shits about it, it's impressive the site has lasted this long and the fact that it gets as many posts per day as it gets.
The site will stay this way until it either dies or something incredible happens and suddenly mlpol becomes popular, which is highly unlikely.
God damn for a site of grown ass adults you're a fucking bunch of whinny bitches and immature bastards.
The userbase won't do shit? Yeah no shit sherlock, if the userbase did anything but complain things would be a lot different, ya think you're the only one that has tried to do something to help the site, just for the users to show an incredible amount of not giving a fuck?
[Read more] >>7020
Honestly i don't understand your guy's constant obsession with /mlp/, it's almost like you're putting it in some autistic pedestral of what a chan should be.
mlp is a depressing place filled with autists, like all of 4chan.
Non-4chan internet is filled with underage and normies, so that's also not very nice.
I'm gonna drop a fat black pill down your throat: Mlpol will never have considerable traffic because the concept itself is autistic and idiotic.
Mention /pol/ to anyone and the only thing you will get is "Oh, the edgy neonazi board?"
Mention /mlp/ to someone and they will either say something about pedos or think you're a weirdo.
Wow, what a surprise, when you mix vomit and shit together you get something even more disgusting.
Yeah sure, it worked for a while, under very special circumstances, but once that ended the site was left with a small userbase posting content of more or less quality and little to no outside traffic.
And it's not surprising at all.
Most small chans you will find out there, with a few exceptions like crystal cafe and lolcow farms, will have little to no traffic because they are unknown or simply small and kind of dead.
Add to that the fact that, as i said earlier, mlpol is disgusting for the average person and boom, you got a very slow site.
Face it, /mlp/ hates this place, they know it exists and they don't give three shits about it, it's impressive the site has lasted this long and the fact that it gets as many posts per day as it gets.
The site will stay this way until it either dies or something incredible happens and suddenly mlpol becomes popular, which is highly unlikely.
God damn for a site of grown ass adults you're a fucking bunch of whinny bitches and immature bastards.
The userbase won't do shit? Yeah no shit sherlock, if the userbase did anything but complain things would be a lot different, ya think you're the only one that has tried to do something to help the site, just for the users to show an incredible amount of not giving a fuck?
>>7026
>it's almost like you're putting it in some autistic pedestral of what a chan should be.
It's hardly the epitome of what a chansite should be. But...wanna know the funny part? It's still way better than this hellhole. And before you blind us with your wisdom once more, I know this site is probably always going to be a small site. The point is, this site was miles better just three years ago. Not only traffic has decreased, the quality has gone to shit as well.
All we have here are boomer memes, news articles, an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard, and an internet tough guy who feels the need to larp in a horse-whispering forum.
The average Aryanne poster in /mlp/ is better than the average poster here. And let's not even mention the /his/ fags spreading outside chansites, wow_mao fags could probably curb-stomp the whole site. Basically anyone who's been in that shitstorm for long enough.
>it's almost like you're putting it in some autistic pedestral of what a chan should be.
It's hardly the epitome of what a chansite should be. But...wanna know the funny part? It's still way better than this hellhole. And before you blind us with your wisdom once more, I know this site is probably always going to be a small site. The point is, this site was miles better just three years ago. Not only traffic has decreased, the quality has gone to shit as well.
All we have here are boomer memes, news articles, an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard, and an internet tough guy who feels the need to larp in a horse-whispering forum.
The average Aryanne poster in /mlp/ is better than the average poster here. And let's not even mention the /his/ fags spreading outside chansites, wow_mao fags could probably curb-stomp the whole site. Basically anyone who's been in that shitstorm for long enough.
1653006271.png (202.6 KB, 900x768, soulless_automaton_by_hemmamann-d4zmxbx.png)
>>7029
That the quality is shit, i can't claim, because i came back recently and i still enjoy a few of the threads, so to not insult them, i can't claim everything on this site is trash.
That many, many of the threads are completely irrelevant to me and my tastes is true though, but they exist for a reason so out of respect for their owners and patrons, i can't claim they are trash.
Now that /mlp/ is objectively better is arguable, for the quantity of PPM (posts per minute), /mlp/ will naturally have both more trash and also more good stuff compared to something slow like /mlpol/.
So in a way /mlp/ does have more threads, and more engaging threads too, but they also have a ton of trash in their bag.
But well, the activity and quality of the board is determined by its userbase, and what i have learnt, personally, is that if you don't have fun carrying a whole thread in your back with little to no input from outsiders (Like the glimglam thread), you will get burnt out and just abandon ship because it's simply not fun, not rewarding and not worth it. (Like the Mein Kampf reading thread)
So, i can agree with you.
But then, what would you do to improve this situation?
[Read more] That the quality is shit, i can't claim, because i came back recently and i still enjoy a few of the threads, so to not insult them, i can't claim everything on this site is trash.
That many, many of the threads are completely irrelevant to me and my tastes is true though, but they exist for a reason so out of respect for their owners and patrons, i can't claim they are trash.
Now that /mlp/ is objectively better is arguable, for the quantity of PPM (posts per minute), /mlp/ will naturally have both more trash and also more good stuff compared to something slow like /mlpol/.
So in a way /mlp/ does have more threads, and more engaging threads too, but they also have a ton of trash in their bag.
But well, the activity and quality of the board is determined by its userbase, and what i have learnt, personally, is that if you don't have fun carrying a whole thread in your back with little to no input from outsiders (Like the glimglam thread), you will get burnt out and just abandon ship because it's simply not fun, not rewarding and not worth it. (Like the Mein Kampf reading thread)
So, i can agree with you.
But then, what would you do to improve this situation?
>>7028
Cos a couple of psychos went off rails with old butthurt.
The excuse is a safe space for ponyfags, the real motive is to cause mayhem to punish /mlpol/ staff.
Narcissism and gaslighting 101 if you look carefully into it.
Cos a couple of psychos went off rails with old butthurt.
The excuse is a safe space for ponyfags, the real motive is to cause mayhem to punish /mlpol/ staff.
Narcissism and gaslighting 101 if you look carefully into it.
1653014100_1.webm (29.5 MB, Resolution:1488x700 Length:00:04:04, filly fuck.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>7005
>webm related
Have this last one for now anon, it's my personal favorite.
>>7018
>I don't find it disgusting, when i was like 15-16 and my mind was full of pony i would totally fuck a horse, given the chance.
If you have had similar ideas to mine in the past then you can somewhat comprehend my manner of thinking and acting, it is an emotional obsession that i have with pony mares which i first developed through lustful curiosity then thus it further snowballed over years into a degeneration of sex addiction.
>Up until my 19's i think i was still like that, but i sort of just grew out of it and after many interactions with disgusting furries and zoosadists, the idea of sticking it into a horse or any other animal is repelling.
Furfags and sadistic zoophiliacs have always come off as unappealing to me, some seem very psychopathic or severely autistic so they are not quite the pleasant kind to converse with.
>Welp, have your fun anon, everyone has their tastes and I'm just some muscular dude that has cute bunny stickers on his wallet so who am i to judge.
I appreciate your tolerance and understanding fren.
[Read more] >webm related
Have this last one for now anon, it's my personal favorite.
>>7018
>I don't find it disgusting, when i was like 15-16 and my mind was full of pony i would totally fuck a horse, given the chance.
If you have had similar ideas to mine in the past then you can somewhat comprehend my manner of thinking and acting, it is an emotional obsession that i have with pony mares which i first developed through lustful curiosity then thus it further snowballed over years into a degeneration of sex addiction.
>Up until my 19's i think i was still like that, but i sort of just grew out of it and after many interactions with disgusting furries and zoosadists, the idea of sticking it into a horse or any other animal is repelling.
Furfags and sadistic zoophiliacs have always come off as unappealing to me, some seem very psychopathic or severely autistic so they are not quite the pleasant kind to converse with.
>Welp, have your fun anon, everyone has their tastes and I'm just some muscular dude that has cute bunny stickers on his wallet so who am i to judge.
I appreciate your tolerance and understanding fren.
1653028804.webm (1.5 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:31, ziggers n griffons choices.webm) [play once] [loop]
Well niggers, this is not random, every time OP and associates begun to fling shit, the post count went to the toilet. This time is not exception and looking how it goes, perhaps (you) have the distinguished honor of to have killed the board.
Badmouthing shitposters because muh quality has consequences and your venom is not harmless. Congratulations. /s
Badmouthing shitposters because muh quality has consequences and your venom is not harmless. Congratulations. /s
>>7038
The whole paranoia on quality just makes people afraid to post funthreads.
People should just post whatever, the quality comes from the users, not the posts.
The whole paranoia on quality just makes people afraid to post funthreads.
People should just post whatever, the quality comes from the users, not the posts.
>>7039
Too late, this time these resentful niggers went off the script when jumped from their usual rant about the staff to attack pol/acks.
Too late, this time these resentful niggers went off the script when jumped from their usual rant about the staff to attack pol/acks.
>>7040
You telling me people are so frail,it takes a single nigger telling them to an hero for them not to post anymore?
If that's the case then good riddance.
You telling me people are so frail,it takes a single nigger telling them to an hero for them not to post anymore?
If that's the case then good riddance.
>>7038
>OP and associates begun to fling shit
Hey, I'm not flinging any shit here. I just moved the conversation put of my Roe v. Wade thread. The shitflinging started after that.
Also, I haven't had the time to closely monitor this thread the past couple days.
>OP and associates begun to fling shit
Hey, I'm not flinging any shit here. I just moved the conversation put of my Roe v. Wade thread. The shitflinging started after that.
Also, I haven't had the time to closely monitor this thread the past couple days.
Like, seriously, I tried my best to word everything as diplomatically and considerately as possible, but it can't be helped if people want to mix past grievances or paranoid suspicions into a completely separate conversation. I don't think we should just avoid having the conversations at all either just because people get angry about things though. I want everyone to express themselves.
What arguments are there for not making a blue pony board, anyway?
Are the /pol/ users afraid of losing activity in political threads?
Are the /pol/ users afraid of losing activity in political threads?
>>7048
It would take additional time and resources and it would possibly be a passing fad that lasts mere days.
It would take additional time and resources and it would possibly be a passing fad that lasts mere days.
>>7039
>paranoia on quality just makes people afraid to post funthreads
I've actually felt this for a long time now, but never really spoke up about it because I thought I might have been the only person affected by the atmosphere. It looks like I'm not the only one who feels that way.
I've heard of people talk about quality over quantity for a while, but on boards that are supposed to be for entertainment, having too tense of an attitude can mean you get neither.
>paranoia on quality just makes people afraid to post funthreads
I've actually felt this for a long time now, but never really spoke up about it because I thought I might have been the only person affected by the atmosphere. It looks like I'm not the only one who feels that way.
I've heard of people talk about quality over quantity for a while, but on boards that are supposed to be for entertainment, having too tense of an attitude can mean you get neither.
>>7049
>It would take additional time
I don't think so, actually. The template for making a board already exists.
>resources
I don't think so either. We have plenty of site data, and barely use most of what is already paid for.
>it would possibly be a passing fad that lasts mere days
That is actually a legitimate concern. I think people would prefer the idea if there were some guarantee that the board would actually be used, or that there were someone committed to stocking it with content.
>It would take additional time
I don't think so, actually. The template for making a board already exists.
>resources
I don't think so either. We have plenty of site data, and barely use most of what is already paid for.
>it would possibly be a passing fad that lasts mere days
That is actually a legitimate concern. I think people would prefer the idea if there were some guarantee that the board would actually be used, or that there were someone committed to stocking it with content.
Reminder that there is still an official poll open. In spite of the fact that this thread has received ~250 replies of spirited debate, thus far only 6 people have troubled themselves to actually cast a vote on it. Currently it's split 4/2 against creating a new board. If you feel strongly about this one way or another, feel free to cast a vote. Poll is open for another 3 weeks, give or take.
https://strawpoll.com/polls/2ayLWpqKbZ4
https://strawpoll.com/polls/2ayLWpqKbZ4
Wherever there is no censorship, the right ideas take over. Wherever the left controls the means of control, leftist lies take over those who remain after everyone willing to reject them gets banned or intimidated into silence.
Giving people a censorship-free blue board for pony discussion could bring in new blood that will gradually learn the truth, one look at the Overboard at a time.
Giving people a censorship-free blue board for pony discussion could bring in new blood that will gradually learn the truth, one look at the Overboard at a time.
>>7064
>Giving people a censorship-free blue board for pony discussion could bring in new blood
It is already censorship-free. So free that you faggots destroyed an already established tight community for the sake of your selfish fantasy. Your crimes won't go without an answer.
>Giving people a censorship-free blue board for pony discussion could bring in new blood
It is already censorship-free. So free that you faggots destroyed an already established tight community for the sake of your selfish fantasy. Your crimes won't go without an answer.
>>7050
Just a couple of fair questions. Given that (you) and frens didn't give a flying hay for pol/aks, and worse yet, (you) and frens went so far as denigrate political content and therefore a pol/ak fly ensued so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen.
Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done? Also, do (you) have any expectation that your pony breads will go unmolested, as retaliation may ensue?
Just a couple of fair questions. Given that (you) and frens didn't give a flying hay for pol/aks, and worse yet, (you) and frens went so far as denigrate political content and therefore a pol/ak fly ensued so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen.
Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done? Also, do (you) have any expectation that your pony breads will go unmolested, as retaliation may ensue?
>>7068
Dude, I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. Wtf makes you think I don't like political content.
And not to brag, but on some months almost half of the political/news threads here are made by me.
>so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen
This has been a problem I've been shouting about for years, but nobody listens.
>damage
Say what now?
Dude, I've been a /pol/ack since 2010. Wtf makes you think I don't like political content.
And not to brag, but on some months almost half of the political/news threads here are made by me.
>so bad that currently the political content is nowhere to be seen
This has been a problem I've been shouting about for years, but nobody listens.
>damage
Say what now?
>>>/mlpol/345244 →
>I thought I was an insufferable faggot
<"So, you finally noticed it." (obscure vidya reference meant to be ignored)
Don't get me wrong here >>7029 tho.
What I meant with this:
>an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard
Is that you shouldn't let some autistic nigger ruin the fun. With some anons literally trying to move out of the board. Over ONE shitposter
>I thought I was an insufferable faggot
<"So, you finally noticed it." (obscure vidya reference meant to be ignored)
Don't get me wrong here >>7029 tho.
What I meant with this:
>an autistic britbong, a bunch of insufferable faggots who can't simply filter the retard
Is that you shouldn't let some autistic nigger ruin the fun. With some anons literally trying to move out of the board. Over ONE shitposter
>>7068
>Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done?
Frankly, this.
/mlpol/ is unrecognizable now, in a negative way.
F
>Do (you) have any plan to repair the damage (you) have done?
Frankly, this.
/mlpol/ is unrecognizable now, in a negative way.
F
>>7073
>destroy
>Implying shitposts on /qa/ could destroy /mlpol/
Do you not remember when we used to get raided by /jp/ a dozen times a day for almost a year? That didn't destroy us.
>destroy
>Implying shitposts on /qa/ could destroy /mlpol/
Do you not remember when we used to get raided by /jp/ a dozen times a day for almost a year? That didn't destroy us.
>>7071 The short answer is that I agree with you. I think I got tunnel vision back then because I felt I was in the right and therefore I had to prove it.
I really tire of all the drama that has been. I wanna focus on the positive sides of mlpol and do something creative and productive; I wanna focus on the things we (anons on mlpol) have in common more (I mean we're severely autistic;P). Not new feelings for me perhaps but still.
Btw, I should have informed you and Ninjas a while ago, really sorry about that, but my computer broke and with it, the password for my burner email disappeared. So if you sent me any, that's why I haven't answered them.
I really tire of all the drama that has been. I wanna focus on the positive sides of mlpol and do something creative and productive; I wanna focus on the things we (anons on mlpol) have in common more (I mean we're severely autistic;P). Not new feelings for me perhaps but still.
Btw, I should have informed you and Ninjas a while ago, really sorry about that, but my computer broke and with it, the password for my burner email disappeared. So if you sent me any, that's why I haven't answered them.
>>7076
It's alright fam, I don't think it was innapropiate of a response either. And I do appreciate your contributions to the board, glad to have you back.
>>>/mlpol/345270 →
Kek
Am not I wuv U taco anon, but I remember those breads.
Sorry for taking this long for such a low effort reply, there isn't much I can do about it.
It's alright fam, I don't think it was innapropiate of a response either. And I do appreciate your contributions to the board, glad to have you back.
>>>/mlpol/345270 →
Kek
Am not I wuv U taco anon, but I remember those breads.
Sorry for taking this long for such a low effort reply, there isn't much I can do about it.
>>7078
>what exactly does this have to do with the blue board idea?
It was on-topic before, we were doing a lit' wrap up, that's all. Sorry, poner.
>what exactly does this have to do with the blue board idea?
It was on-topic before, we were doing a lit' wrap up, that's all. Sorry, poner.
>>7017
Same faggot here, saging, only dropping by to say that the comments I made on the nohooves reee crowd are all out of date and no longer apply at all, another chance out the window. Say hello to NHNB. wasn't my idea, but the people who care about horse communities outside TT will probably be interested in it, they are advertising on 4chucks sucks and cucks.
>>7023
I already said I dont want you faggots to do anything you don't want to do, theres no point in an idea like this without support of the staff. What I want is for you to take your dick out of your ass and actually read things people are saying instead of just seeth in your own mod drama.
Same faggot here, saging, only dropping by to say that the comments I made on the nohooves reee crowd are all out of date and no longer apply at all, another chance out the window. Say hello to NHNB. wasn't my idea, but the people who care about horse communities outside TT will probably be interested in it, they are advertising on 4chucks sucks and cucks.
>>7023
I already said I dont want you faggots to do anything you don't want to do, theres no point in an idea like this without support of the staff. What I want is for you to take your dick out of your ass and actually read things people are saying instead of just seeth in your own mod drama.
>>7106
Honestly I'm not sure. As is usually the case around here, the consensus seems to be that we have no consensus, so the vote didn't really resolve anything. Since only 16 people bothered to vote and the proposal didn't have enough support to break the 50% threshold, I'm inclined to take this as a resounding "meh" and just leave things the way they are. I guess if anyone wants to make any impassioned arguments to the contrary they are welcome to do so.
>>7107
This seems like as good a suggestion as any.
Honestly I'm not sure. As is usually the case around here, the consensus seems to be that we have no consensus, so the vote didn't really resolve anything. Since only 16 people bothered to vote and the proposal didn't have enough support to break the 50% threshold, I'm inclined to take this as a resounding "meh" and just leave things the way they are. I guess if anyone wants to make any impassioned arguments to the contrary they are welcome to do so.
>>7107
This seems like as good a suggestion as any.
>>7108
Well, I had no strong opinion on it either way, so I guess this is as good of a result as any.
Well, I had no strong opinion on it either way, so I guess this is as good of a result as any.
>>7107
Theres the sort of level-headed response that has driven content and innovation for the site
>>7110
Theres an overrepresentation in and around staff of people who view any change (read: progress) as threatening.
It totally doesnt have anything to do with inherent narcissism though, so stop asking.
Theres the sort of level-headed response that has driven content and innovation for the site
>>7110
Theres an overrepresentation in and around staff of people who view any change (read: progress) as threatening.
It totally doesnt have anything to do with inherent narcissism though, so stop asking.
1655774763.png (473.8 KB, 900x853, hermane__saw_by_super_zombie-d4kzias.png)
>>7115
>theres several dead giveaways in that post
The calling to burn OP was mine, I'm not staff but just a single poner looking for OP's pound of flesh.
OP needs to be tested.
>theres several dead giveaways in that post
The calling to burn OP was mine, I'm not staff but just a single poner looking for OP's pound of flesh.
OP needs to be tested.
>>7116
>It was mine
So it was
>I'm not
Taken at face value
>OP needs to be tested
You specifically said burn.
>It was mine
So it was
>I'm not
Taken at face value
>OP needs to be tested
You specifically said burn.
>>7117
OP got the gall of piss many poners offf. I'm an injured party and I want retribution for all the havoc OP and freens did. Wanna change? No way faggots. Take your Blue faggotry to Derpibooru.
OP got the gall of piss many poners offf. I'm an injured party and I want retribution for all the havoc OP and freens did. Wanna change? No way faggots. Take your Blue faggotry to Derpibooru.
>>7116
Dude, I made this thread because the conversation was shitting up my Roe v. Wade thread. Idk why you're so buttfrustrated about it.
The polls are in, and it's already decided that the blue board is a non-starter, so posters can go back to business.
>>7118
>havoc
You're exaggerating.
>I'm an injured party
Cope and seethe, snowflake.
Dude, I made this thread because the conversation was shitting up my Roe v. Wade thread. Idk why you're so buttfrustrated about it.
The polls are in, and it's already decided that the blue board is a non-starter, so posters can go back to business.
>>7118
>havoc
You're exaggerating.
>I'm an injured party
Cope and seethe, snowflake.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-200] [201-284] [Next] [Live (last 200 replies)]
284 replies | 136 files | 71 UUIDs | Page 6
[Add to Thread Watcher]