69311 No.250384[Last 50 Posts]
Public impeachment hearing is starting today.
The big question everyone is asking themselves "Will it be popcorn time or a boring performance?"https://youtu.be/cdXAhuHhqUY
I don't think these hearings will sway the American public either way. They are boring as hell. Nothing but leading questions that asks them to reiterate their rehearsed opening statements.
Might be more fun once it is the Republicans turn to ask questions.
The Democrats might have dug a grave they don't want to be in. I hope someone asks "How will the US relation with Ukraine be going forward now that the Democrats have called the Ukrainian president a liar?"
They sure do like digging their own graves.
Ukraine and Hillary against Trump (2017):https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/constituents/2017-07-20%20CEG%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%20FARA%29.pdf
Letter to:>The United States Deputy Attorney General is the second highest-ranking official in the United States Department of Justice and oversees the day-to-day operation of the Department.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Deputy_Attorney_General
One can only hope.
Todays "impeachment hearing"https://youtu.be/CTvEfW2eUCM
hopefully this time it'll be good
Otherwise I'm posting lewds in this thread
As it sounds so far I predict lewds will be posted. But Schiff is a dreadful boring person so if we're lucky the hearing might pick up speed.
There is literally nothing explicit about boobs and butt
Also someone give me some info on the steel dossier?
I'm an ausfag who can't into american politics
>>250718>Also someone give me some info on the steel dossier?
The Steel dossier is the "intelligent paper" that stated the Russians had images of Trump being peed on by a hooker in a hotel room.
Schiff have been like this ever since democrats won the majority in the House. Democrats are basically showing their true self. Dictatorship runs in their blood. Schiff have often changed the rules during hearings to stop Republicans and give Democrats benefits.
It's abhorrent, they shut them up before they can even start a sentence. Literally the only time a word was gotten in was when the girl literally talked over him.
also>My parents were attacked by both the Russians and the Nazis
Who wants to take a guess how many times this is going to be mentioned at this hearing?
where at 2 so far.
Haven't watched either, but if Hillary actually interfered with British elections this is projection of the highest level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMjB5e6fHAI
Also, you have patrician tastes.
Can someone actually tell me why she thinks that Trump wanted her out, apart from "muh corruption"?
She keeps saying that the President did it because of rumors and highly suspect sources, but isn't it better safer than sorry when it comes to politics with other countries at such "sensitive" times?>>250726>Haven't watched either, but if Hillary actually interfered with British elections this is projection of the highest
Ha, britbongs cucked again. at least we Australians know that the American Government has been ruling our country ever since the Queen got our parliament sacked on behalf of the CIA.
>>250726>Also, you have patrician tastes.
I'm just glad other anons understand
Also why the fuck are they going on about a girl who was acid attacked in Ukraine and the corrupt Ukraine officials never caught the Guy? How does this actually relate to the White house, and why is she now talking about essentially hearsay?
I hate to be shilling this guy so much but this video makes sense of why there's zero logic in modern discourse.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQreNYUsi34
>>250729>Also why the fuck are they going on about a girl who was acid attacked in Ukraine
I think they are trying to paint the picture that since she no longer is ambassador in Ukraine more people will die of acid attacks.
Oh wait, that entire sad story just leads up to her knowing no idea why she was being told to come back to America?
Also is this entire hearing so far about a girl being upset about being fired by the President because they lost trust in her from "supposed rumors"?>>250731>I think they are trying to paint the picture that since she no longer is ambassador in Ukraine more people will die of acid attacks.
This entire hearing is a sham, like holyshit why are they letting her say this shit when it has no relation to the hearing?
Just get to the fucking point lady.
She "felt threatened"
I would not be surprised if Hillary kills her in an effort to blame Trump.
I'd lose my shit laughing tbh fam
Is it wrong foe me to hate Schiff for letting this garbage go on?
>>250737>Is it wrong foe me to hate Schiff for letting this garbage go on?
Schiff is like a spoiled kid that has gotten too much power, and abuses it willy nilly as he sees fit.
File: 1573832595914.webm (Spoiler Image, 2.85 MB, 1920x1080, Sunset Shimmer the exhibi….webm)
No need to be sorry. I enjoyed it.
>>250747>Reporter: Ethan?>Ethan: We wanna know when this becomes fair>Reporter: Hangs up immediately
I also love the guy who goes on about the president using "no evidence" to run the country, while at the same time the people saying all this shit have no evidence.
Also the reporters face becomes sour every time someone tries to support the republicans.
some guy is asking why the republicans aren't asking the hard questions.
File: 1573833855284-2.png (Spoiler Image, 368.17 KB, 1120x1908, 2163658__explicit_artist-c….png)
Lee Zeldin is shady as shit and dodging the question, but at the same time hes right about the cherry picking going on.
Anyone have any further information for why the diplomat fucked up Zimbabwe or whatever that shitty African country is called?
File: 1573834269077-3.png (Spoiler Image, 961.42 KB, 800x1215, 1383761__explicit_artist-c….png)
I'm heading to bed now
Its 4am and I can't handle this bullshit
Sleep well Australia, and sweet dreams about Sunset Shimmer.
File: 1573834411527-1.png (Spoiler Image, 710.09 KB, 1280x1500, 1627361__explicit_artist-c….png)
I hope to god no Glimmerfags shit up the thread by the time I get back
File: 1573834547545-0.png (Spoiler Image, 739.67 KB, 1250x824, 1588674__explicit_artist-c….png)
You better fucking not fucking Glimfags>>250756
Thank you anon
Hearing is starting up again. This time it is the Republicans turn to ask the former ambassador questions for 45 minutes.
"You can't yield time"???
I wonder if Schiff knows how crazy and totalitarian he sounds.
You think they're present the two scoops as evidence against Thrackerzodler?
Anything is possible, but I'm leaning towards they have "sense" enough to not go that far out. They might go to the point to compare her recall as ambassador akin to Hitler and Jews sent to "concentration camps".
Knock yourself off you degenrate faggot
MLP is ruined enough
File: 1573886214413.png (Spoiler Image, 4.81 MB, 1920x2560, 1910090__explicit_artist-c….png)
Neck yourself faggot, Sunset is best and moist holy pony, there is no way she would fall into temptation.
Fuck off Sodomite, Faggot will burn in hell and I am glad that my country is still gay free, unlike AIDStralia.
File: 1573973470941-1.png (Spoiler Image, 891.62 KB, 1024x1447, 946193__explicit_artist-co….png)
Can you please explain to me where in the bible did god say women could not fall in love with other women?
Knock it off. Jewish dialectic will not cut it.
And anthro degeneracy isn't welcomed.
>>250978>off topic>no hooves
File: 1573974862173.png (Spoiler Image, 330.09 KB, 900x619, my little pony real horse.png)
So basically you don't have an answer.
Good job anon, you've basically outed yourself as a shill who hasn't read the bible.
Also do you even know what an anthro is you nig? Eto-ya gets a pass because I like his style>>250982
I've got your hooves right here anon
Here we observe the Australian engaged in his favorite hobby.
Hearing session from earlier today (Lt. Col. Vindman and Vice President Pence Aide Jennifer Williams):https://youtu.be/POBP1uwgYDY
Hearing session coming up (Amb. Kurt Volker and National Security Aide Tim Morrison):https://youtu.be/HAI39mb3QaI
Romans 1:24-32 is an interesting read. Oh wait, your kind don’t have the better half of the Bible.
realize that passage only refers to men's sexual lust and never women's, right? It's only reference is "For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature
" which could mean anything (From women becoming the "man" of the house to women considering it not their responsibility to raise and care for the children, sound familiar?
), and doesn't bring up sexual action until the following verses, when it's referring to men and society (Harlotry, crossdressing, and faggotry is considered a sin, according to Hebrew law and tradition; however, according to Hebrew law and tradition, girl-on-girl action wasn't considered a sinful act; in fact, there was an entire ritual about it when coming into "womanhood").
It does in fact mention sexual lust in verse 24, before mentioning the women. It clearly states the following verse talk about this: Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves
Your explanation is valid, women becoming the "man" of the house, but it also expresses that this is also sexual in nature. The verse you claim it has no bearing on starts by saying: For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections.
Also, claiming Hebrew tradition means it is Biblically sound does not fly I'm afraid. Hebrews still refuse pork and call us cattle. I am hard pressed to find that supported in the Bible, as the pork thing was dropped in the New Testament and I am pretty sure Jesus praised the Roman Centurion, which is not kosher, goy.
So… why are you defending lesbians existing anyway, at least as not a sin? How long is that beak of yours?
Todays hearing, Ambassador Gordon Sondland Testimony (starts in about three hours)https://youtu.be/EkN4P7R5stE
I was a bit off on time, it starts in 30 minutes.
Todays hearing>Fiona Hill, a former National Security Council senior director for Europe and Russia, and David Holmes, counselor for political affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Ukrainehttps://youtu.be/MpTIb_HubrY
holy shit, this society is going down the drain fast
Functioning as intended.
>Trump Woos Jews, Jews Impeach Trump>The impeachment farce is basically a Jewish affair, noted the Israeli daily Haaretz. The soul and engine of the impeachment is Adam Schiff, ‘Shifty Schiff’ in Trump’s colourful expression. His name brings to mind the Jewish banking house of Schiff, top Jewish aristocracy of money and media. The second man is Greedy Goldman, or Daniel Sachs Goldman, the chief interrogator in the impeachment hearings. Sachs Goldman or Goldman Sachs, another top Jewish name and bank. The third Jew in the heart of the impeachment is infamous George Soros. Haaretz could add that the top witnesses for prosecution are also Jewish, the bizarre Gordon “Zelensky loves your ass” Sondland, or Vindman the Spy. Trump would never dare to notice this remarkable coincidence, concludes Haaretz. Only antisemites would.>The Jews are used to play for both teams, and win twice. By going into absolutely forbidden, no-go area of seeing the impeachment team as a Jewish team, this game may be changed.http://www.unz.com/ishamir/jews-impeach-trump-trump-woos-jews/
>Top Dem says ethics investigation into Devin Nunes likely
>The top Democrat on the House armed services committee said Saturday that Republican Rep. Devin Nunes is likely to face an ethics investigation over allegations he met with an ex-Ukrainian prosecutor at the center of the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump.>“Quite likely, without question,” House Armed Services Committee chairman Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash) said when asked by MSNBC’s Joy Reid whether Nunes (R-Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee’s top Republican and a longtime Trump ally, could be investigated.
>The CNN report says that Lev Parnas, according to his attorney, put Nunes in touch with Shokin to help him gather damaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter's dealings with Ukraine. >Nunes called the CNN report “demonstrably false” in an interview with Breitbart.
>Giuliani came to Nunes' defense Saturday, claiming that while Nunes never met with Shokin, "there would have been nothing wrong" with a meeting between the two. "I would have heard of it if he would have," Giuliani said during a Fox News interview.>The former New York City mayor also chided Parnas for his assertions about the meetings when asked about CNN's reporting, comparing his former client to Michael Cohen, the president's disgraced and imprisoned former personal lawyer.
Looks like Nunes is the Democrats next target. I guess they didn't like the way he shamed Schiff and the Democrats during the "Impeachment hearings"http://archive.is/E13f8
The Dems like most leftists only know how to double down, digging their grave deeper.
Another fun thing that will (might) happen in the 2020 election is that Biden will steal the DNC nomination from Sanders just like Hillary did. And it could be the last straw for the Socialist Democrats, and they will run as independent splitting the Dem votes. Knowing the Dems have no chance to win anyway this will be a way for them to get power to Reeee in the House and Senate and thus force the Dems to swing towards the extreme left in 2024.
I'm sure that's totally going to flip in favor of the democraps.
Where's pic 1 from?
No, he threatened the bidens.
Well, the video as well the whole channel have been banned by Jewtube, but a mirror is available at: >Jew Coup: Seditious Jews Orchestrating Trump Impeachment Lynchinghttps://www.bitchute.com/video/FXnftFIzR1Ry/
Also the judenpresse was right on top of it to kvetching.>Far-Right Pastor Calls Impeachment A ‘Jew Coup,’ Begs Trump To ‘Wake Up’https://forward.com/news/435637/anti-semitism-social-media/
Oy vey its another shoah!
Indeed, that video must be saved and spread. It is a testimony of the Jewish treachery wide open for everybody to see.
>Impeachment Report Says Trump Solicited Foreign Election Interference
>House Democrats on Tuesday asserted that President Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to help him in the 2020 presidential election, releasing a 300-page impeachment report that found that Mr. Trump “placed his own personal and political interests above the national interests of the United States.”>The report’s release set in motion the next phase in the impeachment of Mr. Trump, accelerating a constitutional clash that has happened only three times in the nation’s history. Both parties are poised for a fierce, partisan debate in the House Judiciary Committee over whether to charge the president with high crimes and misdemeanors, the Constitution’s threshold for removal, and a likely partisan vote by the House to do so before Christmas.
>“The impeachment inquiry into Donald J. Trump, the 45th president of the United States, uncovered a monthslong effort by President Trump to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election,” said the report, released ahead of a vote on Tuesday evening by the Intelligence Committee to formally approve it.>It asserts that Mr. Trump’s “scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and undermined our national security in favor of two politically motivated investigations that would help his presidential re-election campaign.”>The report also lays out what it calls an “unprecedented campaign of obstruction of this impeachment inquiry” by Mr. Trump, based on his refusal to release documents from agencies including the State Department, the Defense Department and the White House budget office, and his directive that potential witnesses not cooperate.
>Traveling with Mr. Trump in London for a meeting of NATO leaders, Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary, denounced the Democratic report moments after it was released. She called it the conclusion of a “one-sided sham process” led by Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee.>“Chairman Schiff and the Democrats utterly failed to produce any evidence of wrongdoing by President Trump,” Ms. Grisham said in a statement. “This report reflects nothing more than their frustrations. Chairman Schiff’s report reads like the ramblings of a basement blogger straining to prove something when there is evidence of nothing.”
>The report is a watershed moment for Mr. Schiff’s months-old inquiry, opening what promises to be a bitterly partisan and freewheeling phase in which the two parties will feud publicly over weighty constitutional questions while competing to frame their own political narratives. Anticipating the split, Mr. Schiff used the report to lament the disconnect between the parties and warn that it amounted to precisely the kind of intensive polarization that worried the framers of the Constitution.>“Today, we may be witnessing a collision between the power of a remedy meant to curb presidential misconduct and the power of faction determined to defend against the use of that remedy on a president of the same party,” Mr. Schiff wrote. “But perhaps even more corrosive to our democratic system of governance, the president and his allies are making a comprehensive attack on the very idea of fact and truth.”>He added, “How can a democracy survive without acceptance of a common set of experiences?”
>The Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin its debate on Wednesday with a public hearing that features four constitutional scholars discussing the historical standards for impeachment and their assessment about whether Mr. Trump’s actions meet the bar for removing him from office.>Lawyers for the Intelligence Committee are expected to formally present the report to the judiciary panel and answer questions from its members in the coming days, though no hearing has been scheduled. Mr. Trump’s Republican allies on Capitol Hill released their own report on Monday, condemning the Democratic impeachment effort as illegitimate, and asserting that the president was not seeking personal political advantage when he pressed Ukraine’s leaders to investigate his rivals, but was instead urging the country to address corruption.
>In addition to approving the report, the Intelligence Committee is expected to vote Tuesday evening to transmit all of the raw evidence it collected to the Judiciary Committee. Though Mr. Schiff has indicated that investigative work could continue, the report largely brings an end to his committee’s inquiry.>The Judiciary Committee will also consider potential evidence presented by other investigative committees and Robert S. Mueller III, the former special counsel, who documented Mr. Trump’s attempts to thwart his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 election.>If a majority of the House voted to approve articles of impeachment, which would be drafted by the Judiciary Committee, the president would be impeached. The proceedings would then move to the Senate for a trial. Two-thirds of senators would have to vote to convict Mr. Trump to end his presidency.https://web.archive.org/web/20191204003051/https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/impeachment-report-says-trump-solicited-foreign-election-interference/ar-BBXIoqP?ocid=spartanntp
this may never make it out of the House>Progressives are going after a Democrat for voting against impeachment. Moderates should be nervous.http://archive.is/tONLm#selection-907.0-907.100>Moderate Dems warn against 'kitchen sink' impeachment pushhttps://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/04/impeachment-centrist-moderate-democrats-075530
there are 31 democrats who sit in seats that voted for Trump in 2016. even the Washington Post admits impeachment is unpopular there. 2 democrats voted against the inquiry. the GOP only needs 17 of these 31 democrats to flip and impeachment is dead. they already have 2.
I could see it happening because the DNC isn't helping them and progressives have largely ignored their concerns. if impeachment is beaten in the House, Pelosi is probably finished as speaker and a massive progressive vs moderate fight.
I was at a restaurant with a bunch of coworkers the other day for an after-work breakfast type of thing, and they had CNN's coverage of the impeachment hearings on. My coworkers are all pretty much normie liberals who can't stand, and nobody was even paying attention to the TV. Literally no one cares or is taking this impeachment seriously.
I read an article the other day where the author was speculating about how the whole thing is a strategic gambit by Pelosi to keep Sanders and Warren from campaigning while the Senate trial is going on. I personally think a simpler explanation is that the far-left can't into strategy and Pelosi has given up trying to control them. But either way this whole thing is shaping up to be pretty hilarious.
>>252630>Pelosi has given up trying to control them
pretty much, the only reason she's speaker is because of them and the black caucus. they bet everything on Russia and had to cook this BS up on the fly when the Mueller investigation crashed and burned
Steve Bannon had an interesting take on it. he thinks the deep state orchestrated this entire thing to get Trump to cave on either immigration, trade or national security. the Kochservatives will hold him hostage with the conviction vote. there are enough of them in the Senate to do it. I think he's already largely caved on immigration. maybe not totally but he is a shell of his 2016 self, on that issue.
if you get a chance to check out Pence's Hudson institute speech on China, he basically says China is running a info war on the US and has operates throughout the highest sectors of American society. it's a boring speech but I can't believe he'd say it openly. so maybe Trump caved on immigration to clean up the China mess. IDK
>The ruling class will continue their insanity until the US Ponzi economy collapses, the 99% are sent to the concentration camps, a civil war breaks out, and WWIII starts so they can divide the wealth of the world among themselves. This is the end game. The only question is when.
Netanyahu has said that this is their plan. Judging by current events the "when" is now.
>“If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it doesn’t matter what you do, America is a Golden Calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the World’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it’s god’s will and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again, again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.”
It is clearer by the day what is going on.
The so called "globalist" faction, which has Soros as the visible face, is clashing with the so called "nationalist" one which has Trump.
Soros has the european establishment in his pocket as well as most of the American one; while Trump is allied with Netanyahu.
Who do you think would win in an all-out war between those factions?
They'll band together to shit on the goyim before it comes to any serious blows.
both factions only want power. both are shit. Fun to watch the fireworks though.
>>252756>Who do you think would win
I don't think is about to win, but to try to suppress the opposite faction to get the upper hand toward the incoming global economic reset, which means: it's about money.
Anyways, we are fucked. Reset means economic depression, hunger, and social unrest for the plebs, but, a golden opportunity for the planners to offer a solution to the problems they caused on purpose from the very beginning.
Trump's side will win this one because the liberal left and their neocon partners are fucked.>netanyahu
More like Netanyahu is allied with Trump. bibi's a chump from what i hear of him>>252759>>252758
A futile effort in demoralization, go back to cuckchan faggots.
Think about it.
If Trump is taking us all for a ride; wouldn't be healthier to unmask him earlier?
Until now most of his actions as POTUS have been to accommodate Wall Street, the interests of the Jews, and the well-being of a foreign country.
For how long do you think this dereliction of duty can continue without his base calling him out?
[Last 50 Posts]
Awaiting Remarks From President Donald Trumphttps://youtu.be/LGoMNVu1pU0