/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/


Archived thread


795ca0b6da4906873cf89018678b499d4c7233047fb9e4ca46971cef9bc38a07.jpg
North West Front/New Awakening/Butler Plan
Anonymous
ndT7y
?
No.213984
213986 214002 214145
What does /mlpol/ think about the idea of racially aware whites moving to the pacific North West to form an ethnostate? The U.S. isn't going to last and we need to make sure whites get a slice of the pie when the empire collapses, but is this the best strategy?
Anonymous
TfGMl
?
No.213986
213987
>>213984
Don't know much about NWF, but from what I've seen its the big gey
Anonymous
Rbt8O
?
No.213987
213990
>>213986
What's wrong with it? Is a LARP or a honey pot?
Anonymous
TfGMl
?
No.213990
>>213987
Its been a while and I don't tend to keep screencaps and shit, but I have them down in my head as being either somewhere between LARP (and possible honeypot) completely unrealistic/unsupportable strategy. Also their official documentation is CWC-tier ass, written and illustrated by a guy who hasn't realized that he's shit.
Anonymous
cb39v
?
No.214002
214005
>>213984
It is unsustainable, as soon as they become visible enough, the (((System))) will shut them down.
Any State needs weapons to survive and they have no bigger stuff than rifles unsuitable to engage planes or armored vehicles, therefore they are doomed because they are a static target.

Anonymous
6zGjh
?
No.214005
I am 100% in support of secessionism. However, given the last attempt this will probably not happen without violence until the country completely collapses. If violence breaks out then you have a better chance fighting on your home turf or at least regionally rather than being concentrated in the Northwest where military will also be massed. It's not impossible to win in that scenario, but it won't be won by a handful of internet memers who just moved there to get away with it all. If the country collapses it's the same way, and you'll have a better opportunity of fixing more states than if we all huddled in one place and let leftism wash over the rest of the country. Also, I'm a Southern boy and my ethnic interest is WHITE SOUTHERN, not just white.

>>214002
Afghanistan would differ. However, the difference is that Afghanis are a hardy people who are intimately familiar with their land. A bunch of geeks moving out into the wilderness will have neither advantage (no offense intended to /mlpol/ users).

It's not a honeypot but it's as unrealistic as thinking "ALL of America will be white again!" It's just not happening. The most realistic option is splitting America into multiple ethnostates. A small libertarian nation against a large authoritarian nation won't go well, but if all the nations are small then they'll each compete to be better in terms of liberty.
Anonymous
mlBqi
?
No.214145
>>213984
They don't like us. I think they're well meaning, but they consistently put on an air of being able to project more political sway than they actually do considering a significant chunk of their proclaimed territory is under democrat rule on the state level or within Canada's borders. If their organisation was in growth and serious, they'd be moving to take administrative control of their territories through legitimate means by now and would be more detectable on the state level. Since we've seen none of that and only a bunch of come home memes, this makes me think they're mostly isolated homesteaders in the counties that go to meetups and talk online about what they would do if everything collapsed into anarchy. Classic bystander syndrome on an organisational level, local county influence only. By no means do I consider myself an expert, however, these are only my surface level observations.

Furthermore, both the United States and Canada would both need to be in a state of anarchy hue hue they already are for any secession attempt to bear long term fruit and not turn into a decades long slog of guerrilla warfare in the hills. I don't doubt their ability to wage an asymmetrical war for control of the turf they do control if it came down to it, but I have doubts about their ability to form a coherent and prosperous nation afterwards should they win.

Also they're against even fictional horsefucking, so that's a clincher against it for me.
Anonymous
6r6ix
?
No.218275
218390 218762
File (hide): E1B82D3E5BD6B28E2AA8F77E6C02010A-31386933.mp4 (29.9 MB, Resolution:480x360 Length:00:15:11, 1555569310204.mp4) [play once] [loop]
1555569310204.mp4
its a honeypot and astroturf to get a controlled oposizion microstate. the funding of this state is planed to be jewed.
Anonymous
cb39v
?
No.218390
Good enough for me _ec8efc18db40a4ad1596c3333842911c.png
>>218275
Good to know this video is noticed.
Anonymous
ndT7y
?
No.218762
218763
>>218275
How is it a honeypot? I can assure you the Jew S A does not want to lose any land.
Anonymous
nkrcn
?
No.218763
218929
>>218762
It's definitely set up to be stillborn. No attempt to take over a leftist stronghold like Washington has any chance of being successful
Anonymous
D2a6Y
?
No.218929
218930 218931
>>218763

and some of (them) will hapily give you loans too suport your state. this will maje you dependand.

you need to create your own money supply for this. like hitler did.
Anonymous
D2a6Y
?
No.218930
>>218929

and the gouverment would need to have many layers of systematic, not person bound, controls of the rulers.
Anonymous
cb39v
?
No.218931
surrounded by knives.jpg
>>218929
>you need to create your own money supply for this. like hitler did.
And everybody knows what happens when anyone tries to break free from bondage.
;