>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/applying-sharia-law-in-england-and-wales-independent-review
It's official, British Caliphate SOON.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): B978EDD7B04704052835A77A69AB215A-152385.png (148.8 KB, 500x574, 1504256069848.png)
I notice you didn't say Scotland. Are they already cucked for Sharia or is there a chance yet for Britain?
>>114910
Scoots might go independent because of "muh brexit".
>we will see the beginning of reconquista of the British Isles
Scoots might go independent because of "muh brexit".
>we will see the beginning of reconquista of the British Isles
This is more of a study then a deceleration, but there are some interesting parts to it.
>In conclusion it is clear from all the evidence that sharia councils are fulfilling a need in some
Muslim communities. There is a demand for religious divorce and this is currently being
answered by the sharia councils. This demand will not end if the sharia councils are banned
and closed down and could lead to councils going ‘underground’, making it even harder to
ensure good practice and the prospect of discriminatory practices and greater financial costs
more likely and harder to detect. It could also result in women needing to travel overseas to
obtain divorces, putting themselves at further risk.
>We are dismayed that some activists are already branding the independent government review as a 'white wash' in support of Shariah Councils. Members of these inquiries are highly respected professionals such as
a retired High court judge Sir Mark Hedley, Professor Mona Siddiqui, an expert in Islamic law
and family law lawyers Ann Marie Hutchinson and Sam Momtaz. The involvement of religious
scholars Qari Asim and Syed Abbas Ali, who are regarded as progressive and only acting in
an advisory capacity, has also been criticised. Their insights are important given that the issues
being considered involve faith.
>Islam is neither rigid nor limited to narrow and conservative interpretations. Muslims who view
Islam in that manner do not represent Islam in its entirety. Likewise, those secularists who
view Islam in a reductionist manner will campaign to limit religion to the private domain and
want it eliminated from all public discourse. However, our faith is not like a garment that can
be cast aside as soon as we leave our home. To build a cohesive society, we must all move
towards mutual understanding and respect. This includes acceptance by all sides that Islam
can be compatible with secularism. Human rights do not only have to be discussed in secular
terms, they can also be addressed within the framework of religion. Muslim feminists here and
abroad have long been promoting enlightened interpretations of Islam that are compatible with
democracy, human rights, freedom, and pluralism.
No matter how factual the rest of the study may be, its conclusions seem to have been decided before hand with an ideological lens.
>In conclusion it is clear from all the evidence that sharia councils are fulfilling a need in some
Muslim communities. There is a demand for religious divorce and this is currently being
answered by the sharia councils. This demand will not end if the sharia councils are banned
and closed down and could lead to councils going ‘underground’, making it even harder to
ensure good practice and the prospect of discriminatory practices and greater financial costs
more likely and harder to detect. It could also result in women needing to travel overseas to
obtain divorces, putting themselves at further risk.
>We are dismayed that some activists are already branding the independent government review as a 'white wash' in support of Shariah Councils. Members of these inquiries are highly respected professionals such as
a retired High court judge Sir Mark Hedley, Professor Mona Siddiqui, an expert in Islamic law
and family law lawyers Ann Marie Hutchinson and Sam Momtaz. The involvement of religious
scholars Qari Asim and Syed Abbas Ali, who are regarded as progressive and only acting in
an advisory capacity, has also been criticised. Their insights are important given that the issues
being considered involve faith.
>Islam is neither rigid nor limited to narrow and conservative interpretations. Muslims who view
Islam in that manner do not represent Islam in its entirety. Likewise, those secularists who
view Islam in a reductionist manner will campaign to limit religion to the private domain and
want it eliminated from all public discourse. However, our faith is not like a garment that can
be cast aside as soon as we leave our home. To build a cohesive society, we must all move
towards mutual understanding and respect. This includes acceptance by all sides that Islam
can be compatible with secularism. Human rights do not only have to be discussed in secular
terms, they can also be addressed within the framework of religion. Muslim feminists here and
abroad have long been promoting enlightened interpretations of Islam that are compatible with
democracy, human rights, freedom, and pluralism.
No matter how factual the rest of the study may be, its conclusions seem to have been decided before hand with an ideological lens.
File (): 50BA3E075D9CE1434AF2D6262B6876C0-74891.jpg (73.1 KB, 512x288, 5465767547.jpg)
>>114915
Heh, you should've watch this movie familia. Accurate&depressing... Focus on the setting, minus the message.
Heh, you should've watch this movie familia. Accurate&depressing... Focus on the setting, minus the message.
File (): B8BD1FAEAA2958D50FD25351769F9379-633040.png (618.2 KB, 2000x1566, 1F119936-46A7-49EC-8647-43D1BFA309C5.png)
Here's a very important court case to watch:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5359249/High-Court-decide-Islamic-marriages-legal.html
The Islamic marriage ceremony is part of Sharia law. If the UK high court rules that the couple is legally married, then
a) The UK no longer has separation of church and state
b) The UK recognizes Sharia law as legally binding.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5359249/High-Court-decide-Islamic-marriages-legal.html
The Islamic marriage ceremony is part of Sharia law. If the UK high court rules that the couple is legally married, then
a) The UK no longer has separation of church and state
b) The UK recognizes Sharia law as legally binding.
>>118514
Sure would be a shame if we raided british subreddits and posted information about this, eh?
Sure would be a shame if we raided british subreddits and posted information about this, eh?
>>118521
That's what libtards say, and I'm fucking tired of hearing it. Even ironically. Liberals are the cancer that helped Islam grow in this country. If you want to push the day of the rope forward, before the day our race dies, then redpill normies and shame the remainders en masse.
It's cringey to be a soyboy liberal cuck in 2018.
That's what libtards say, and I'm fucking tired of hearing it. Even ironically. Liberals are the cancer that helped Islam grow in this country. If you want to push the day of the rope forward, before the day our race dies, then redpill normies and shame the remainders en masse.
It's cringey to be a soyboy liberal cuck in 2018.
File (): DF91746B8B51DB1FAD9A1B0435AA2EA8-68256.gif (66.7 KB, 576x324, 1515186175273.gif)
>>118527
So that's why they call you Amerimutts.
Normies are on reddit. Newbies are on reddit. If you want to win a meme war, you need people looking at your memes.
So that's why they call you Amerimutts.
Normies are on reddit. Newbies are on reddit. If you want to win a meme war, you need people looking at your memes.
>>118542
Do you not remember what happened last time /pol/ got reddit involved you absolute fucking newfag?
Do you not remember what happened last time /pol/ got reddit involved you absolute fucking newfag?
File (): 59CA7AFF747B5744203F13743739CD32-34855.jpg (34.0 KB, 500x411, 1515184462369.jpg)
>>118542
I will never, ever use plebbit. /mlpol/ shall never, ever mingle with goddamn plebbit. The reason why this board even works in the first place is because Anons from both boards in April all appreciated the absence of plebbit.
I will never, ever use plebbit. /mlpol/ shall never, ever mingle with goddamn plebbit. The reason why this board even works in the first place is because Anons from both boards in April all appreciated the absence of plebbit.
File (): 121A9A709980B071922392B3A36EF605-111812.gif (109.2 KB, 420x360, 26D82726-601D-4DF4-9EF5-B30991A27FE7.gif)
File (): C282000521DED139A94FB4AA17E8591D-28406.jpg (27.7 KB, 640x480, 1416195696216.jpg)
File (): B21AC32FF1E3145A85683077B0FCFFC4-3829935.png (3.7 MB, 3000x3000, 678f66123b9f5cb5776552cc088a0227.png)
File (): 43D359C487D53A72FA4352E5BE0E4ACE-163086.png (159.3 KB, 467x468, 1517329318561.png)
File (): 0352D1244ACBFB0C35B6506507520196-3009011.webm (2.9 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:00:21, 1518745128983.webm) [play once] [loop]
File (): A498F7EF233488949171B932F9A8D8E8-1528387.webm (1.5 MB, Resolution:960x540 Length:00:00:11, 1518745057139.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>118765
Be lucky that I don't have that webm of explosives being simultaneously detonated
While being wrapped around victims necks....
Be lucky that I don't have that webm of explosives being simultaneously detonated
While being wrapped around victims necks....
44 replies | 12 files | 19 UUIDs | Archived