/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Roy Moore now in the lead.
Prepare yourself for some Liberal Tears
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/alabama-senate-special-election-roy-moore-doug-jones

Moore at ~51% with ~4% reporting, dis gon be gud

>>94570
>>94568
Only 51% is not an assuring margin

>>94571
The nigger areas have reported in already.

>>94571
just jumped up to 53%, and it started off with an edge for Jones. They always report the dense liberal areas first, remember the presidential election?

>>94577
>. They always report the dense liberal areas first
This. It's to try and dissuade any unsure or late voters who are leaning towards voting Republican. Was extremely obvious during the election.

Salt for the Salt God!

>>94592
>>94590
>>94588
Oh more salt. God I love it.
We just keep winning and winning. Who knows what happens next!

Send Moore your energy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b89d1oip7WM
Thread theme.
>>94597
Take my energy!

>>94597
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

>>94588
What sub? I feel like salt-mining.

>>94607
>he wants to abloish all amendments past the tenth
B A S E D

>>94598

LET'S GOOOOO! I can't wait for the salt!

>>94608
8chan? There is no fucking way. That smells like reddit. I must see this for myself. Post a damn link, please.

>>94616
Thank fuck. For a bit there I thought 8chan went full cancer on me.Thank you.

>>94590
>voter registration machines
mysides.png

65% now reporting.
Roy Moore is ahead with 53.3%
Doug Jones at 45.3%

>>94629
You got a source so I can monitor it myself?

>>94634
Thanks!

70% now reporting.
Roy Moore is winning with a 5% lead.

MOORE ENERGY!

>>94637
72%. Moore has this.

>>94597
Holy shit they're even still whining about the Al Gore endless recount, this is hilarious

>>94648
I wouldn't be so sure.
NYT is at 75% Moore is only at a 2.8% lead now.

I'd prefer a larger margin. I think that the advantage is ours but I can't rest until it's settled.

>it went down to 2.5%
Shit!
We need Moore energy, guys!

>>94653
>NYT
Well there's your problem.

Summoning meme energy for Moore

>>94658
Does he need a majority, or just get the most votes?

>>94658
I SUMMON THE POWER OF EQUESTRIA FOR ROY MOORE

>>94666
TRIPS GAVE HIM .2%

>>94666
Wew Satan. Barbies truly are evil.

>0.9 lead
Are you fucking kidding me?

FUCK

Holy shit these psychos literally want every Republican dead. What the hell?

>>94675
Niggerbelt is the last 22%…

>>94683
Fuck

>>94682
They're beyond insane. They honestly think the country is being "stolen" from them through voter suppression.

MOORE ENERGY FOR MOORE

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Come on Moore

Damn

HITLER ENERGY FOR ROY

>>94690
CAN'T SOY THE ROY!

HAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRARAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Salt's not so good because it's close…

MOORE USE MY SHITPOSTING POWERS TO WIN
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Let there be Moore

FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK

>>94703
The election is still ongoing, but it is not looking good.

Time to join in the salt mining! Even if Moore loses there's still plenty of whining and seething hatred out there.

Roy must win. If he loses it will be a media feast of pushing "guilty with no evidence" blah blah bullshit. "Listen and believe"

>>94702
Really makes you think…

>>94704
Yes, but saying "if" decreases moral

>>94708
Libs always cry about representation, but when it is geographic representation they discriminate.

>>94710
We can be realist. The media has been on the attack 24/7 pushing Listen and Believe narrative. If Roy can pull off a win, it helps shut down aimed false sexual scandals. If he loses, they are going to push harder

>>94710
We are big boys, we can take it.

>>94709
My almonds have been activated
>>94715
>>94713
Because of how close it is, I'm holding hope until it is formally anounced

>>94715
>>94713
It is what it is, but considering how hard they had to push and all the false accusations they had to fling at the guy to get a victory margin this slim in the grand scheme of things it's not that big a deal.

Unfortunately it looks like they're already calling it for Jones though.

They say it's over. Roy loss.

>>94720
Write ins and 10% of the voted haven't been counted.
There is still a chance, albeit not very likely.

>>94724
It's not over until it's over.

>>94725
This

>>94720
I demand a recount

he just lost 0.1%, that's something

>>94739
Jones did, I mean.

>>94720
It's over. They stole the vote for Jones. Just watching the way the results came in, I can't believe it was legit. 8% lead, comercial break, boom, closed down to 4. Do it again a couple times and all of a sudden your guy is winning. This is what I expected them to do to Trump tbh, the fact that he managed to win despite all the obvious tampering is amazing. If it makes you feel any better though, Moore won. Both Republican and Democrat establishments don't want him, and they worked together to sway the vote. Electronic ballots allow for unprecedented manipulation. They really should be illegal. No country in the world would get away with running elections the way we do. That's the problem with this country and the people who run it though, when you're on top, you're above the rules.

>>94741
Yeah, plus the fact that they had to shill this hard and completely slander Moore's character just to pull off a less than 1% margin of victory over a candidate accused of being a child molester; not exactly a good look for them. Plus this is just a special election, doesn't whoever wins this seat have to run again in a couple months anyway?

>>94742
>Plus this is just a special election, doesn't whoever wins this seat have to run again in a couple months anyway?
Jones may not stay in the seat long, but the Rinos just want Moore out.

we might need to reassess our tactics for 2018, where is pence on the voter fraud investigation? what can we do to push the republican party to reform themselves and their message? who should we be reaching out to and how do we reach them? how do we fight against this listen and believe sexual allegations BS?

incidentally does anyone know how much money the DNC spent to win this? aren't they already in debt after hillary?

>>94746
The GOP will reform over time.
The party is full of old farts and the younger generation supports Trump.
It will happen regardless overtime.

>>94748
the left retaking the house and/or the senate in 2018 would be pretty damaging

>>94752
True.
Jones 639,088 Roy 629,749
still less than 10,000 difference with 16,000 votes left to be counted.
It will be interesting to see whether he makes a last minute comeback.

>>94754
he's also stated he won't concede, with it so close he could push for a recount

I don't think the issue is 'reforming the GOP'. We aren't the GOP. The GOP is not our party. Trump is an outsider, but they couldn't fudge the numbers enough to keep him from office. If you'll recall, Trump did not initially support Moore, and that is because Moore is an outsider too, and Trump was trying to play nice with the GOP.

The GOP and the Democratic party is one in the same. The establishment is one entity, don't buy into the bullshit. Trump won the presidency with the entire GOP kicking and screaming along the way. Don't think they are suddenly /ourguys/ just because Trump won.

>>94756
Yes you are right.
I should've said something like "transforming the GOP to serve our interests."

>>94757
>"transforming the GOP to serve our interests."
Except we can't. It's completely corrupt.
The only thing we can do is start a new political party.

>>94756
this:
>>94757
basically, unless we're actually going to start some sort of nationalist party

>>94758
A niche interest party would get crushed in the USA, as elections are usually first past the post. You either need to commandeer a party like Trump, or find a large group that has no representation.

>>94758
It's easy.
You just have to subvert the party.
Get a bunch of the less autistic anons to become big members to the point where they run in elections.

>>94760
>or find a large group that has no representation.
Like, maybe… the people of the US?

>>94762
Ur back

>>94761
>You just have to subvert the party.
And fight an uphill battle all the way to the top spanning literally years?
When it would be easier to start a nationalist party that promises to pull out of the world to focus on domestic affairs?
>>94763
Yep!

654,072 639,564
6,000 votes left
its over

>>94764
When was the last time a party other than the two biggest parties has won an election? The American people can't make a complicated decision.

>>94766
>When was the last time a party other than the two biggest parties has won an election?
Isn't the deciding factor ultimately the people instead of the party? Conservatives and even moderate liberals hate the two-party system. Give a third way plenty of coverage, and it will win.
>The American people can't make a complicated decision.
Then someone needs to make that decision for them. They are nothing more than cannon fodder at that point.

>>94766
personally I was going to wait until the democratic party to be destroyed and then push for a populist or nationalist party, but I was counting on the democrats not being able to recover from 2016

>>94762
A lot of people don't vote though. The ones that do vote either vote red or vote blue mindlessly. That fact is compounded by gerrymandering. A Democrat once won sitting in a prison cell for God's sake.

>>94770
>A lot of people don't vote though.
Because they've given up on both parties being any different. They see it as Poison A and Poison B. They want a third option.
>The ones that do vote either vote red or vote blue mindlessly.
Useful idiots, cannon fodder, undergrunts, take your pick.
>That fact is compounded by gerrymandering.
Agreed.
>A Democrat once won sitting in a prison cell for God's sake.
Sufficient cause for armed revolt.
>>94771
That's only if the South sees the north as irredeemable. Compare the first pic (1904) to second pic (2016).
The North/South divide as far as votes go has all but disappeared. Both vote as one nation, under God, indivisible..
A nationalist party that campaigns on isolationism and focuses on domestic issues will win. The tricky part is getting enough coverage.

Looks like Trump actually knew what the hell he was doing when he didn't support Moore. Maybe the Republicans will think twice before try to shove cronies down people's throats, but I doubt it. Quite frankly, the Republicans are doing everything in their power to puss of their supporters and their reaping what they sowed. I definitely think America is ready for a new party now, something like the libertarians except not a complete joke.

>>94752
Retaking the Senate is next to impossible for them in 2018, the House is basically going to be a complete free for all, they could either gain or lose ground.

>>94756
This is true, but the GOP is probably our most likely vehicle for actually accomplishing something. Getting a third party off the ground would be a huge effort with little chance of success, that's why both Trump and Bernie chose to run as Republican and Democrat respectively, despite neither of them being affiliated with their party of choice. The best course of victory right now is to stay focused on gradually transforming the GOP, pushing /ourguys/ as candidates whenever possible. This election wouldn't be anywhere near as big a deal if it had been Strange instead of Moore running; even if we lose we're still chipping away at their armor. It took the left roughly a century to fuck this country up, we shouldn't be so arrogant as to think we can fix it in a few election cycles. We just have to be patient and stay focused on the goal.

>>94777 (checked)
>Retaking the Senate is next to impossible for them in 2018
please explain
>pushing /ourguys/ as candidates whenever possible
neither trump or moore are really /ourguy/s though, they're just the best available candidates with policy goals we support, not that they're bad but neither hates the jews or is all in for either fascism or capitalism nor are they as pro-white as what we need

>>94778
Your asking to much of America itself. There is absolutely no way this place will allow blatantly anti semetic people into office. Forming a third party based around your ideas would be impossible.

>>94780
currently yes, but we need to change people's minds

>>94768
Here is the rule of thumb about third parties in America. They don't win elections, but they can make changes. The populist part of the late 1800s managed to force the Democrats into accepting a free silver platform, and they almost got William Jennings Bryan elected, who was basically a populist running as a Democrat. The best method for a third party to take is to butt fuck the Republicans out of the 2020 presidency, and then force the Republicans to get a grip and reform. This essentially combines the idea of working from within the GOP, and working outside of it. The only question is what the party should take issue with on the Republicans.

>>94783
*Populist party

>>94783
>out of the 2020 presidency
absolutely not. Trump isn't perfect but reelection is easy and he's much better than anyone the democrats would put forward. The 2024 election maybe

>>94786
Fair point, I forgot it would be Trump running again. Reelecting him would basically be the same thing, but on a smaller scale. Plus the Republicans are probably going to try to pull another mccmuffin with their Mormon savior, so it would be best to wait till 2024.

>>94789
it's also who he'd be up against, I've heard the democrats are looking at Zuckerburg, De Blasio, or Biden for 2020 so far as well as Micheal Obama and Bernie running again

>>94792
I think that they'll try to find a Hispanic. They didn't get enough of that voting bloc, and Niggers will vote for them no matter what. They don't think. They don't know the candidates. They just vote blue for gibs.

>>94778
There are a total of 23 seats up for reelection in 2018. The democrats would need to gain I think either 3 or 4 of them to pick up a bare majority. However, out of the 23 up for reelection only 8 are Republican. They basically have to hold on to 15 seats and gain 3. Several of those seats are in Trump country as well. It is highly unlikely they will be able to take the Senate back.

>neither trump or moore are really /ourguy/s though, they're just the best available candidates with policy goals we support, not that they're bad but neither hates the jews or is all in for either fascism or capitalism nor are they as pro-white as what we need
You have to do these things incrementally. If you try to run literally Hitler he's going to lose, America just isn't ready for a truly redpilled government just yet. We need to start pushing things in our direction, and with Trump and to a lesser extent with Moore, we've finally managed to start doing it. Both parties are basically disintegrating anyway, we just need to move in and take over slowly while the old guard annihilates itself.

>>94777
>This is true, but the GOP is probably our most likely vehicle for actually accomplishing something.
We wouldn't be up against the GOP. We would be up against THE ENTIRE GOVERNMENT. GOP and Dems cooperated to try to drum Trump out, regularly.
>The best course of victory right now is to stay focused on gradually transforming the GOP
Except we're sitting on a demographic nuclear bomb (pic related). We don't have the time to try to transform the GOP. Such a process would take years, even decades!
We have to organize a third party and rally everyone behind it, withing the next 5 years, or we lose all chance of reversing the current trend, save for bloodshed.
>even if we lose we're still chipping away at their armor.
Seems like we need to not chip away, but blast holes in their armor.
>It took the left roughly a century to fuck this country up, we shouldn't be so arrogant as to think we can fix it in a few election cycles.
Demographic nuke! Plus, the game is rigged in their favor. You are proposing that we continue with the same strategy that got Trump in office. I say we throw that strategy away, and go all-in with a third party, or go nuclear.
>We just have to be patient and stay focused on the goal.
The goal is to rid the corruption in the government, using any means possible, without turning into the very corruption we fight against. Patience is a virtue, but too much patience is passivity.
>>94783
>Here is the rule of thumb about third parties in America. They don't win elections, but they can make changes.
There's always an outside chance that a third party will win. Both the right and the left are dissatisfied with the two-party system as a whole. The Conservatives are completely disillusioned with the GOP, and the moderate liberals absolutely hate the SJWism of the Dems. Satisfaction in the two-party system has never been as low as it is now.
We have a perfect recipe for a third party victory. Start a nationalist party or hijack an existing nationalist party, meme it over the course of the next three years, brand it as a third option away from the two-party system, make EVERYONE aware of the third party.
If the MSM shills against it, it may actually sway opinion towards the third party. The MSM pulled every trick they can come up with against Roy Moore to the point of accusing him of pedophillia, and he still barely lost. The MSM has completely discredited itself, and even normalfags are becoming aware of the lies spewed by the MSM.
>The best method for a third party to take is to butt fuck the Republicans out of the 2020 presidency, and then force the Republicans to get a grip and reform.
You don't understand. You're treating the GOP as an entity that can be molded into whatever we wish when it is the corrupted establishment. The GOP will just go back to the way they were before once the heat is off!

America has two options: Americans can rally behind a nationalist party and seize the government through elections, or launch an armed revolution and overthrow the government.
I will say that if the peaceful rally behind a nationalist party fails to win the elections, even when an overwhelming majority is behind that party, it will lead to an armed revolution.

>>94598
Proud to live in Ohio and helped to make this shit happen.

>>94776
What are you on about? Trump didn't support Moore cause he was an outsider. He went with the GOP pick to play nice with his new party. The other guy was the cronie they were trying to shove down our throats. They couldn't get their man, so instead they had to run an outsider; a man who wouldn't play the game. The same reason they'd have taken Jeb over Trump, you see? So they manipulate in the same direction as the Dems, and Moore loses.

>>94792
Zuckerberg would be hilarious to watch.

>>94800
trump supported moore near the end stressing the need for a republican in the seat
>>94802
I agree he's literally currently taking classes on appearing more human because the memes about him made him upset. But remember this is what the left thought of trump that it would be funny, and they're not laughing now

>>94805
That's true, famous last words I guess.

>>94792
Really? Bernie is running again after his disastrous fail?

>>94807
he's been asked and he hasn't said he won't, I don't understand why anyone would support him though given that he betrayed literally everything he claimed that he stood for by backing hillary

>>94798
I agree with most of what you said, but I think an armed revolution is much more likely than ever getting a third party off the ground. Seriously there was only one viable third part throughout all of American history, and that was the populists. I'm almost tempted to say fuck the Republican party, and start voting Democrat just so a revolution starts sooner, while we aren't overwhelmed by spics.

>>94805
Yea, after Moore beat the GOP guy, because Alabama didn't want the shit they were trying to get them to eat. Trump backed the people's choice. Would you that he didn't?

>>94809
I wish the left would start the civil war

>>94800
Lol I forgot, disregard that post. Still, I'm sure there is some kind of lesson to be learned here, maybe it's that Trump ought to stick to his guns. Or maybe we are just doomed to live under a democratic dictato, I mean commune.

>>94811
The ones at the top are too smart to do it just yet, I think, even if there is a significant split, and the animals that they rule over are idiots who are easily distracted, so there is almost no threat of them starting things early as long as they have their bread and circus.

>>94809
>I agree with most of what you said, but I think an armed revolution is much more likely than ever getting a third party off the ground.
Agreed. I only mentioned the third party option because it is literally the last chance of uprooting the corrupt government peacefully.
>Seriously there was only one viable third part throughout all of American history, and that was the populists.
Then it's populist, or war.
>I'm almost tempted to say fuck the Republican party, and start voting Democrat just so a revolution starts sooner, while we aren't overwhelmed by spics.
Accelerationism. I'm kinda scared to post this because you never know who may be watching, but I wouldn't use votes to try to spark a civil war. I'd start lobbing Molotovs at government buildings, or targeting prominent politicians in assassinations.

>>94808
He's probably going to end up as somebody's lackey honestly. My guess is the Dems will go with either Kamala Harris or Pocahontas. Michelle Obama might enter the ring and I don't think we've heard the last of Hillary either. Bernie will probably end up shilling for whoever the hard left candidate is, he might even end up running as VP.

>>94815
The populists are long gone. We would need a new party, but I can't become a living meme like the libertarians. And I still don't know what it would take issue with the Republicans on, because most people are dissatisfied with the functionality of the Republicans, not their actual policies. You can't just start a third part by saying "hey, we are Republicans, but we're just going to actually get shit done

>>94821
>We would need a new party, but I can't become a living meme like the libertarians.
No risk, no gain.
>And I still don't know what it would take issue with the Republicans on
It wouldn't "take issue with the Republicans", it would take issue with the whole government.
>because most people are dissatisfied with the functionality of the Republicans, not their actual policies.
I think they're more frustrated with the dysfunctionality of the Republicans, and don't pay closer attention to their policies.
>You can't just start a third part by saying "hey, we are Republicans, but we're just going to actually get shit done
I wouldn't have put it as "We're Party X, but we're going to get shit done". Something more like "We are the American Party, and we are going to completely purge the government."

>>94821
If you want to continue this, it'll have to be tomorrow, because it's late, and I'm tired.
Good night /mlpol/, have good dreams tonight!

>>94824
probably best to continue this in a new thread.
Mods should close this thread soon.

>>94825
but there might be a recount

>>94826
Perhaps.
I doubt it though. If there is it can be it's own thread.

Some interesting tidbits.

It looks like the election was so close that it's triggered an auto-recount. Additionally, compared to the last time Jeff Sessions was elected, the number of Republican votes for the senate seat dropped by 50%. 50 fucking percent.

I think that this can be looked at a few ways.

A: A LOT of republicans stayed home. Either because they felt secure in their victory or the psyops convinced them not to vote.
B: Voter fraud.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgR82apd5LA

It's infowars reporting those numbers. I'm a bit too exhausted right now to dig up the archives myself.

Ultimately it's up to the mod's decision.
I guess the election isn't really over until Roy concedes.

>>94829
Did you see Roy's speech? He's not conceding.

This story's not quite over yet.

>>94830
what are his actual chances here though, were all military votes counted yet? and what do we know about this "auto-recount"

>>94836
>What are his actual chances though.
I'm not sure. We expected a landslide victory, but apparently 50% of republican voters stayed home compared to when Sessions was put into office. That sounds fishy to me, especially since it was packed at my voting station and the staff there told me that it was packed out to nearly the parking lot for the whole day except for like a half hour period around mid day. Granted this is just one station, but still.

If evidence of voter fraud is found then things get interesting.

>were all military votes counted yet
No. According to what I heard during Roy's speech, they're not in yet.

So women can just cry rape now and change the result of an election. You guys think we will start to see more of this?

>>94838
> 50% of republican voters stayed home
got more data on these people? age range, where they live, etc.
>they're not in yet.
how many military men are we talking?

>>94838
I actually find it a little suspicious. I know it could be just wanting him to win, but the way this went just doesn't feel right to me. It was too theatrical. The way it started off with a lead for Jones, then Moore kept slowly building and building until we all thought he was going to win, then all of a sudden a bunch of blue counties came in and brought his lead down to just under 50%. It feels like a movie script, honestly.

It also doesn't make sense the way they keep saying the "black vote" was what did it. I can't imagine that blacks were so motivated to come out to support some completely generic, forgettable Democuck that it actually tipped the balance of the race, in Alabama of all places.

Something is definitely fishy about this race.

>>94843
what's odd is that sex allegations against trump actually won hm more support in 2016 see >>94795

>>94853
Yeah, Trump wasn't accused of wanting to fuck teenagers though, that may have been a significant difference.

>>94843
Same thing happened with Hillary, actually.
Trump was ahead like 3mil votes, 95%> counted, then Hillary got like every single vote from that point on. Wasn't enough to win, but it did get her "popular vote"

>>94828
Something that I misinterpreted last night. The auto recount takes place if the tallies are within half of a perecent of each other. When that point was brought up I was under the impression that it was that close, but apparently at present the gap is a bit larger than that and the auto recount isn't triggered yet. However, since it was very close, the military votes were not in, and the whole thing was fishy, Roy did not concede that evening.

My apologies for misinterpreting that. I do hope that the votes are recounted under great scrutiny since I suspect that the risk of fraud is high with both the dems and the Rinos opposing Moore

Also apparently litterally every county saw a nearly clean 50% drop in republican turnout.

Smells fishy as fuck.

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/364636-possible-recount-in-alabama-what-happens-now
>Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill told reporters during an impromptu Tuesday night press conference in his state capitol office that the state will direct counties to count provisional ballots, absentee ballots and military ballots.
>Those final numbers will be due to Merrill's office by Dec. 22, after which the results will be certified sometime between Dec. 26 and Jan. 3 of next year.
>Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), who had been appointed to fill the seat until the special election, will remain Alabama's junior senator as long as the process takes.
also evidence of cheating: https://archive.fo/Rxrul

>>94836
OK. On the matter of a potential recount, this is my understanding:

If the provisional/absentee/military ballots push the difference to within 0.5% of each other, then a recount automatically happens.

Otherwise either campaign can request a recount if their campaign is willing to pay for the cost of the recount. I don't know how much that costs or if Moore has the resources to cover that bill. The Rinos in DC certainly won't assist.

>>94980
Jill Stein did a recount in 3 states. Surely Moore could afford it?

>>94980
i'd chip in just to see the left lose this victory

>>94980
>>95029
If he can't cover it we could probably start up a collection on /pol/ or something, I imagine enough people would be willing to chip in to pay for a recount worst case scenario.

The more I think about it too, the whole thing with the Alabama Supreme Court ruling that voting records could be destroyed is fishy as well. We all know the RINOs didn't want Moore to win this thing any more than the Democrats did, it's not at all inconceivable that the whole swamp was working together to steal this election and sweep it under the rug.

I don't think we're getting the whole story here and I don't think this is over yet.

>>95064
That's my feeling too. Dems and Rinos working together to stop an outsider candidate.

My personal suspicion is that our situation was probably reached via a number of factors, namely :
1: Psyops successfully convincing some Republicans to stay home or write in somebody else.
2: Voting machines neglecting to count some % of republican votes.
3: Major get-out-the-vote campaign amongst blacks (especially to protect the taxes for dem programs). This one isn't illegal. At least the act of transporting registered voters to the voting booth is legal.
4: a few compromised dem counties holding back their results and then stuffing their ballot boxes at the eleventh hour in the event that near 100% reported turnout would make a difference.


I don't have any proof though. Just the suspicion that 50% republican turnout at 90+% turnout from the dems is highly suspicious and IMO warrants careful scrutiny.


My gut feeling is that we'll find tens of thousands of uncounted Republican votes if the paper ballots are ever audited.


I absolutely hate the prospect of Jones in the seat. This result has surely woken up any Republicans who threw away their vote. I know how those people think. They'll gladly throw away their vote if they have qualms about someone who is "guaranteed" to win so that they can hedge their bets and virtue signal as needed. If history proves the guy popular then they'll talk about how they're a proud republican. If history is unkind then they'll brag about how they didn't vote for the guy, so don't blame them for the mess. But actually losing to a Democrat will wake them up for the next election and they'll all show up.

Jones knows that Hell will freeze over before he can win the seat again, so he's free to 100% ignore the citizens of Alabama and purely follow the Democrat party line. He won't even make an attempt to appease his conservative constituents.

I don't know what else that I can do besides wait and see what action is taken by the Moore campaign. If Jones keeps the seat, I suppose that I'll have to go full autistism mode at educating those around me on the proposed taxes and regulations that get voted on as part of every ballot. God knows most of them ignore them and only vote for people. At least that's how my boomer co-workers are (one fucker keeps gloating about how he voted for himself for president…as if that's something to be proud of…).

Maybe I can get a stamp made for spamming Jones' mailbox whenever the senate votes for something. I know that he'll ignore me, but spamming him would be something I guess. At the very least dealing with the spam would waste his assistant's time that could have otherwise been used towards undermining the country.

MegaAnon claims that the election was rigged and Trump knew.

>This morning, Trump specifically confirmed TWO VERY IMPORTANT THINGS about WHY HE ENDORSED STRANGE [pic related]…
>1. "I said Roy Moore will not be able to win the General Election. I was right."
>So, here Trump admits THEY KNEW Moore WOULD NOT WIN, BEFORE the primaries even started, hence he endorsed Strange when they did start.
>2. "Roy worked hard but the deck was stacked against him".
>Here, Trump directly refers to the "deck stacked" against Moore, which as you saw above, he confirmed he ALREADY KNEW was stacked.
>Now go back and RE-READ these caps AGAIN, in THIS order…

Source: http://galacticconnection.com/transcript-of-todays-megaanon-posts-on-the-alabama-election-and-the-expected-upcoming-fallout/

>>95814
All this crap is what makes me take a break from politics for a time. All this cloak and dagger house of cards bullshit is both upsetting and depressing.

>>95829
Agreed. But also not facing it and letting it happen while we ignore it makes things go worse.
Basically having fun is ignoring evil, and facing evil isn't fun. Fun and fixing things are opposites. We need to do both.

>>95832
>>95829
All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

>>95059
https://securecontribute.com/judgemoore-mbelectionintegrity/
he says he needs 75,000 if you want to chip in

>>95918
Alabama anon here. I donated some $$$ to the fund. I had one of those "Vanilla" Debit card giftcard things lying around that I had been wondering how I was going to use 100% of the funds on the card. This works out good enough.

I'm hopeful that this will reach the mark.

When you posted that link the other day, the total was at ~20k. Just now it looks like my donation kicked it past the milestone to 50k.

>>96383
he's still got a week or so and he's 2/3rds of the way there after a bit more than 2 days, he'll make it

>>94566
no idea who this white nigger is but he uses a fucking bit so he's obviously a terrible person.

>>96392
Sorry for bumping the thread, but we're approaching the deadline. It's the dawn of the final day and it's still a hair short of the threshold.

>>98460
dude, if it's midnight on the 27th then I'm pretty sure it's over.

>>98461
On that I agree. I'm just interested in watching this story come to an end, and I hope something good can come out of this. That hopefully measures are taken to prevent many of the left's dirty tricks in the 2018 midterm elections.

The only reason that I bumped the thread was to remind those who were interested in this story that it should be coming to its conclusion soon.

>>98464
I hope he finds a way to get the recount done with the funds he's already collected, but if this is a herald of things to come, then it looks like things aren't going to get much better.

>>98461
Pretty sure it means midnight tomorrow, we still have about 20 hours or so to go, assuming I'm not completely retarded on time zones. He's only about 2k shy, I think he'll pull it off. I want to see what happens, if nothing else the longer this draws out the more of a pain in the ass it will be for the left, and Luther Strange holds the seat in the meantime.

>>98467
I hope you're right on that, it means there's still hope on this all reaching into the wider spread of media.

>>98460
are there threads on this with the link on 4/pol/ and 8/pol/?

>>98468
what concerned me is how quickly the story just sort of died after the election was over, there wasn't even that much liberal gloating like they did when they won in Virginia. It's like they just want to bury the whole thing quickly. I at least want it to get a closer look, there was definitely something fishy about that whole election, and if they fixed one and got away with it they could fix others this year.

Apparently he didn't get the 75k by midnight, but apparently yesterday Moore also filed some sort of complaint to postpone certification of Doug Jones and to investigate for election fraud. He has the 75k now on the 28th.

Earlier today officials dismissed the complaint and certified Doug Jones as the official winner.

My gut tells me that that election fraud did take place here. For fucks sake, do you expect me to be believe a 50% reduction in republican turnout for this sort of election? However I don't think that Moore has a hope to reveal it and reverse the decision with the Media and both the republican and democrat establishments standing against him.


The following is wishful thinking, but I hope that some of older posts that speculated that Trump picked Sessions as his AG so that they could observe the Alabama special election under a microscope to catch the voter fraud thanks to a veteran's home turf advantage turn out to be true. This is where it really gets into my wishful thinking: I'm hoping that they carefully observed how the voter fraud worked NOT TO EXPOSE THEM IN ALABAMA, because they're very good at spinning and burying stories and deflecting claims of fraud. My hope is that in the 2018 midterm elections, when more seats are up for grabs and the stakes are higher, that plans are in motion to undermine and decapitate fraud attempts at the eleventh hour when there is no time left to safely implement new fraud plans. That they'll force the opposition to fight on a level playing field. I'm dreaming of dems trying to bus in out of state voters and finding out that no busses are available because all of them have "coincidentally" already been booked for other events. I'm hoping for last minute reveals of technical flaws in voting machines to force careful hand counts. That trusted Middle men that keep the villains safely insulated from their dirty work are all rounded up to deprive them of a safe way to commit their dirty deeds.

That's what I hope for. That somehow the defeat here won't be for nothing and that lessons have been learned to help in the future. At the very least, a blue Alabama should shock lazy republican voters in other states enough to guarantee that they show up to vote on election day.