/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>181649
Or just get our own hosting, a payment processor is more difficult but it can be bypassed on paypal by listing all donations to Atlas as "For services rendered" or something.

>>181662
paypal will shut you down to.

>>181663
Hence the non-specific reason for donations, they can't shut you down and not catch flak if they don't have a solid reason to do it, and I don't think you're legally obligated to make the purpose of any transactions on Paypal a matter for public record beyond them happening.

Get a .onion fixed.

>>181667
.onion is monitored by glow in the dark cia niggers
>>181666
seems legit satan

>>181649
Hopefully (((they))) fucked up by going after Gab. They went for a big target and people are noticing. But reading a few comments on a few tech sites don't give me hope. When they remove all ways for people to communicate openly they will take to the streets.
But this might also spur the creation of a true selection of alternative payment, hosting, and registrars that actually care for free speech and run and funded by people wanting free speech. If VISA and/or MasterCard denies payments to a section of the internet solely based on political stance (even if they try to claim otherwise) they are most likely violating some banking laws.

>>181674
>When they remove all ways for people to communicate openly they will take to the streets.
To communicate means potentially "to organize".

>>181675
>To communicate means potentially "to organize".
True, and removing the support and hope for the future they might get by being part of a community they feel they belong to will lead to lone wolfs.

>>181676
>True, and removing the support and hope for the future they might get by being part of a community they feel they belong to will lead to lone wolfs.
thats exactly what they want

>>181674
>Hopefully (((they))) fucked up by going after Gab.
Gab will lose. Even if twitter and the like don't boot them without money they will starve. We need a new internet. Perhaps a crypto backed mega meshnet?

Food for thought.

>>181686
So true

I would not put it beyond the legacy media to hire a hitman and stage a spreekilling on (((God's chosen people))) just so they can fuck an uprising competitor into the dirt.

I have redpilled two normies on gab and the jewshooter being a liberal CIA plant all along. They still believe this is just being done to try and turn jews against Trump, because they still think he's as deep as this goes and the ruling elite is just a bunch of bitter oldfags mad at the new kid on the block, but it's still progress. Two more redpilled UKIP votes for the next election: Secured.

I guess not even orange stalin will save free speech now.

>>181799
the game was rigged from the start

>>181799
You know what to do...

I feel as if we are in the twilight of the internet.

>>181649
I may be retarded, but maybe we can pretend its 1992 again and start a phreak network

>>181917
I still have my old external modems. Wonder if I could find an old copy of renegade bbs.

>>182001
Damn, it's still out there. DOS though.
http://renegadebbs.info/

Maybe this is a stupid question, but could we host the website using something like host coin?
https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/hostcoin/

>>182004
>The main problem HostCoin needs to solve is how browsers can access that data.
It's not there yet.

A friend of mine was just saying this to me when I mentioned Gab.ai/gab.com going down, and he pointed out. I have it in brackets, because it already has quotations:

[Gabai: "The (lay) person who calls Jews to say blessings over the Torah reading and follows along with the Torah reading to correct any mistakes."

I never really trusted it anyway.]

So then I looked up "gabai" on DuckDuckGo.
http://www.jewish-languages.org/jewish-english-lexicon/words/176

oh yah that jew church shooting. theyre trying to blame it on gab because the boomer had an account with em, even though other shooters had facebook and youtube accounts and no one clamors for them to be shut down. it feels textbook false flag. do a bad thing, loosely relate it to something you dont like, then ban that thing because "it fueled the bad man"

>>182164
secret jew messages to other jews. hmmm

>modem
We have had distributed networks for discussion since the 80s at least, with Fidonet and Usenet. There is nothing stopping someone from running such a setup today, other than the eternal problems of stopping spam and people trying to disrupt things. With the right organization it might work though.

There are some other platforms like for example Freenet (freenetproject.org) that goes to extremes trying to provide an uncensorable platform, untraceability and plausible deniability for users. Haven't looked it in years though. Freenet is from the early 2000s but seems to still be under active development. It was slow and resource hungry then, nowadays I guess it wouldn't be worse than most phone apps.

The main issue is getting people to use these things. I see lots of posts talking about how "we need a new platform that does X" but nobody seems to realize that there are dozens of them already around. It sometimes seems like the only ones who use Tor, Freenet or anonymous remailers are tech-savy people who want to swap CP. Not exactly a broad audience, nor one that most people want to be associated with.

>>182172
There is the argument that Gab marketed their platform to people who were banned from the other platforms, which includes a lot of people who share a lot of the same beliefs as the shooter.

Just remembered someone talking about a platform called Aether (getaether.net) earlier, has anyone here used it? Seems pretty reasonable from the QRD on their site - a distributed system with no central authority, semi realtime, peer-to-peer, posts eventually expire, and it's open source supported by donations.

Apparently a donation gets you a registered username from a central "nickserv" as a reward, so this should mean it's relatively easy to find people and to use in general. (This central authority is not needed for the network to function and there can be alternative ones.)

Cons are that it's only text posts, you can't see it in a browser but have to install it, and it seems to be developed by just one guy.

Also I'm not sure about the "impeach mods" mechanic where users can vote moderators out, it seems like it would be open to brigading.