/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>170665
thread theme: https://youtu.be/qSh2HswKn5Y

>>170665
No, conspiritards,

The building didn't enter 'freefall,' because there's this thing in physics called a gigantic furnace of materials burning so hot the fire could incinerate you and boil your blood multiple floors down away from the fire.

-This is where the steel beams meme started, it's a incorrect proposition that has nothing to do with the core issue (on purpose, as a joke).-

Now, combine this with the fact the WTC7 had the design flaw of a central support column and suddenly the large steel frame doesn't matter and starts looking more like a danger of collapse...

Now take this all together and realize the building actually starts collapsing BEFORE you see it enter 'freefall,' by the time you see the building 'freefall' most of the inner flooring sections have already started to 'pull in.'

Conspiritards will deny this.

>>170667
Nice flag

>>170675
>>170680
>no arguments
Exactly as I expected.
Only the best from /mlpol/, there-go, no truthertards here.

This is how the interior caved in on itself before everything else.
Now factor gravity into the model and let yourself be free of infinitytard nonsense.

>>170667
>>170683
>>170685
Two flaws: 1) WTC 7 wasn't even hit! If the building was going to collapse at any time with the slightest provocation how was it approved? Also, controlled demolitions are supposed to appear that way as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2E_m7l2Rww

2) Major media reported on WTC 7 collapsing with it still standing on live camera. https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-mysterious-collapse-of-wtc-seven/15201

3) HOW it happened is less important than WHO did it.

>>170690
LOL RETARD ALERT
It wasn't even comprable to a controlled demolition you stupid fuck, the building damaged buildings on the other side, across a four-lane street.
If it 'appeared' like a demolition (which it doesn't even look close to, except from one angle superficially) then it would've ACTUALLY collapsed into its own footprint, haha, fucktard.
WTC7 was reported as collapsing while still standing because the fire department had reported multiple times that the building was in imminent danger of collapsing, most worryingly visible was the bulging of sections of the building wall (probably the same ones that collapsed on the east, remember? Fucking moron.

If you care so much about WHO did it, Pentagone maybe? Then why do you insist on bringing up retarded talking points?
Is it to obfuscate the HOW and the WHO?

Seriously, neck yourself (((anon))).

>>170698
>it must have been the Pentagon who did it!

>putting words in my mouth
>this hard
At least take me on a date first Anon-kun, you fucking faggot.
I never blamed the pentagon, I provided a suggestion for who WHO referred to.

>>170696
>>170698
See >>170683. If you think he's a literal Jew you're blind or paranoid. He's playing Devil's Advocate to make sure we actually know what we're talking and keep from falling into a Reddit-tier echo chamber. We have to keep on our toes.

>>170711
The video: >>170683 (You) here is scale accurate, it did tip that much and it is in a 1:1 ratio.
What isn't shown is the building turning on one of its corners and also collapsing into the other.

Reuters misreported before the building collapsed that it collapsed, all in the context of the FireDept. constantly reporting risk of collapse and evacuating the area.

Hanlon, Occam?? What are you doing here!1?

They are to scale; the building behind it is the Freitzman Hall and a distance of four-lanes.
At least I'm making claims.

You're here to derail. In typical Federal Spook caricature boogeyman fashion.

>>170711
Even if he is a Jew, what are you going to do if you're outside /mlpol/ and someone posts these same assertions? You won't have a community to back you up in calling out the Jew, and you'll have to rely only on your knowledge and logic.

If they are baseless claims then they are easy to refute. Even a pro tennis player will play against someone of inferior skill just to practice. If you don't practice you can't win.

And yes, of course coincidences matter. They don't matter in serious argumentation, though, so you must rely on other methods.

>>170721
I'll put in more effort in that event. In the meantime, here, there's a rule against shilling.

I looked at the Pentagon impact back in the day and I found the building damage and the down light poles to be consistent with an aircraft, its engines and wing width.

>>170666
Satan y u porn musik??

Cooper predicts 9/11?
https://youtu.be/zrTjPGy2k_U

>"...great awakening..."

all of you faggots got trolled.

>>170798
Why Glim? She doesn't even have wings.

What if I said, I don't care who did 9/11? I care more about the federal reserve, South African Boer-hunters, google's social-engineering through altering search results for political narratives, chimp BLM people worshipping criminals and demanding the dismantling of law and order, the Muslims our government constantly tries to poke until we've got another Islamic state to go to war with, and the Jews who push essentially everything I just listed both in America and Europe.

>>170803
Do you see any wings in this hole?

>>170807
That's the last exit hole in the third ring inside the building. At that point the plain was a hot molten quasi-liquid which flowed around the pilars in the building and built up pressure on that wall. The wall then punched out. The plane was not solid at that point in time. See pic 1 >>170736

https://youtu.be/fX0EVRkny_A

>>170807
>>170809
It's almost as if given the time, every truther photo or interview can be found to support an equally likely explanation, no conspiracy needed.

>>170810
It is still very odd that it happened. But the plane was a plane.

Happy 9/11 everypony!

Happy 911. Ban the Kike btw.

Sadly I am traveling and I don't have my 9/11 image collection on my laptop so I can't join the commemoration this time. But there will always be next year.

>>170667
>>170683
>>170685
>>170695
>>170704
>>170714
>>170716
>>170719

I have been told a while ago by insiders that the mod staff of MLPOL has been secretly colluding with jews behind the scenes for a while now. Should none of these posts receive a proper ban notice take this as proof that those allegations are in fact true in nature.

Never forget.

>>170841
staff is busy shitposting
ITT
fgt

JET FUEL

>>170909
Sadly, this meme will only ever be a meme, as you don't need to melt steel to make it weak.

>>170665
Some muslims crashed planes into strategic targets as part of a coordinated attack that basically every intelligence agency on earth knew was going to happen, yet did nothing about because a reason to invade the middle east was needed.

>>170916
The jet fuel can't melt steel beams claim isn't about a requirement for the beams to melt to cause structural collapse. It's about claims that the cleanup contractors encountered melted steel at ground zero.

>>170924
>The jet fuel can't melt steel beams claim isn't about a requirement for the beams to melt to cause structural collapse.
Sorry. Usually, when I hear the meme being used, it's in relation to structural collapse.
>It's about claims that the cleanup contractors encountered melted steel at ground zero.
Unless there's a legitimate reason for the steel being melted, then yes, that meme is more than just a meme.

>>170798
You should put in 2 griffins flying into the buildings. Close to the truth we will ever get

>>170665
What really happened is that once seeing on the news I went out, got drunk with friends, made some offensively funny jokes in the bar and got thrown out but an Australian bar-man who could not see the joy of Americans realisiing how shitty terrorism is and thinking how much money they had given to the cause to help IRA do the same in London.