/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Hello, Czaro. Thanks for posting finally.

This is the closest thing representing my ideology I suppose. Also, notice OP pls. He's the fellow that made Leslie Fair.

>>87053
Monarchist here.

>>87053
H-hot and saved!
>>87062
Same

cant

>>87063 →
>>87065 →
>>87053

I have a bad feeling about You.

>>87087
heil

>>87087
>>87084
>not even posting Pone
Nermany confirmed for no fun.

>>87091

fun is for normies

Princess celestia is my führer

>>87053
Are you really the one?

>>87098
I am.

>>87062
Cool, I'm a monarchist too.

>>87103
I'm guessing you're a fan of Janusz Korwin Mikke? Also, Hoppean AnCap.

>>87122
Mr Korwin-Mikke is my mentor. He opened up my eyes on the free market. Too bad he fails at politics.

>>87130
The only right way to do politics is through bloody revolution and murder, so Mikke is doing okay. How else are you going to drain the swamp?

The only image that I think can sum it up is that one image where Aryanne and Leslie are sharing that double-ended dildo. Unfortunately, I don't have it.

>>87206
Thank you, germany!

>>87208

your description of the image was very exact and as far as i know this is a piece of rare art. you helped yourself the best.

>>87091
There is no pony that would represent my view of the world and there is no porn of the non-existing pony.

>>87268
>There is no pony that would represent my view of the world and there is no porn of the non-existing pony.
Elaborate your worldview in 3 sentences or less. We can fix this

>>87269
leftist ideals
right wing rationality
science, philosophy and misanthrophy
also confusion

>>87332
Classical liberal maybe? Definitely around the centrist range.

Don't know if there is a pony out there that fits that ideology though I wanna say Twilight Sparkle fits in that range.

Id like OP to explain how he can be Ancap and a monarchist at the same time.

>>87341
Have you read this?

>>87343
Hoppe wasn't a monarchist. There's even been clarification that he never was. But, I suppose you can be inspired by it and kind of miss the point.

>>87343

No, I dont read. If you want, you can give me a quick rundown how you put Anarchy and Monarchism together if it is related to the book and/or the question.

>>87341
I'm not an ancap. I support free market and traditional values. Therefore it makes me more a paleolibertarian.

>>87344
I am aware, but he demonstrates monarchy's preferability over democracy

>>87341
As one who once entertained the thought before becoming full ancap, I can explain it a bit.

It isn't true anarchism but could be described as "Minarchist Monarchy." There is a king or other hereditary ruler over the nation, but his power is purely ceremonial. Although he cannot violate the property of others no more than any ordinary citizen, such a ruler would naturally wield great social influence and would be able to exercise "soft power" which could steer society in a positive direction without direct use of force. As a private citizen he would probably be quite wealthy and may act as a private arbiter in law.

The goal is to combine the liberty of anarcho-capitalism with a central rally-point that monarchism enjoys. It is also less likely that this role would be corrupted than a similarly ceremonial but elected position. The weakness is that, over time, monarchs will seek to consolidate their power and eventually establish taxation, bringing us back to ground zero. Also, misguided monarchs, even if ceremonial, can use their influence negatively, such as promotion of homosexuality for example. Still, a "minarchist monarchist" or "paleolibertarian" as our based Polack terms himself is a superior form of governance to anything existing today.

>>87336
Get out normie! Jk, you can stay as long as you also hate SJWs and have a sense of humor. I'd say the pony that fits you would be this ponified version of Sargon. He's purple-pilled himself but has red-pilled more normies than probably any other Youtuber.

>>87347
>>87053

>Post pony porn that represents your ideology
>posts Leslie Fair, the Ancap Pony

>>87103
>Cool, I'm a monarchist too.

>>87347
>I'm not an ancap. I support free market and traditional values. Therefore it makes me more a paleolibertarian.

I guess in that case you broke the rules of your own thread.

>>87349

That is all very interesting, but why would a ceremonial Monarch with enough wealth and influence to steer society in an important way allow an Ancap society to collar him to just being purely ceremonial? Under these circumstances even a Burger King could become a Warlord and erect a system of taxation and legitimate Royalty if he could get away with it.

>>87348
Yes, but he only uses it as a point for own ideology. And, although he detailed it, all it sums up to is feudalism witb capitalism. Which makes me think, why not say you're a feudalist? Ignoring all other questions, it's an odd thing that I won't see last for long. Funny, Hayek made a book "The Road to Feudalism." And, here his followers follow the road to feudalism!

>>87356
>road to serfdom
FTFY. Seriously though, that is an interesting point.

>>87351
I needed an excuse to post this image. Also, my ideology shares some postulates with ancap, mostly free market.

>>87356
Hoppe is not a feudalist. Feudalism implies the existence of a fixed hierarchy enforced through coercion. Hoppe in his book "A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism" actually heavily disparages what he terms "conservative socialism" which he considers distinct from leftist socialism in one respect only: one seeks to keep a static hierarchy while the other seeks to abolish hierarchy altogether. Ancaps believe that hierarchy is natural and beneficial as some humans more capable/clever/ambitious than others, and therefore effort should be rewarded within a free capitalist system. However, keeping a subset of people in power over others by force–essentially a government–is not only a violation of the NAP but also contradicts the meritocracy of capitalism.

>>87354
Valid point, which is why I no longer am a "minarchist monarchist." One could argue that a strong libertarian tradition would prevent such consolidation of power, but tradition is valuable only as long as people pay lip-service to it. How many Americans still embody the self-sufficient ethic of two centuries ago, and how many Germans still uphold the noble morals of their ancestors a hundred years ago?

>>87363
As I quote,
"I only claim that this [feudal] order approached a natural order through (a) the supremacy of and the subordination of everyone under one law, (b) the absence of any law-making power, and (c) the lack of any legal monopoly of judgeship and conflict arbitration. And I would claim that this system could have been perfected and retained virtually unchanged through the inclusion of serfs into the system."

>>87349
I am the farthest thing from a normie you can imagine.

I just don't fit in any political affiliation.

>>87480
I like you. I'd like to know more.