Quick rundown: Dyke Premier Wynne has just passed Bill 89, which allows for Children's Aid to seize your kids (biological/adopted/step children) if you hold anti-LGBTQ/binary gender/anti-gay marriage views and place them in LGBTQ gay-couple homes (friendly reminder that 40%+ of gays are pedophiles). Muslims/Sikhs are exempt because the bill is worded to consider the child's "creed".
“Even before Bill 89 was passed, but immediately after its introduction in December, I learned of several Christian couples who were turned down for adoption on account of their deeply held religious beliefs about traditional marriage and human sexuality,” he told LifeSiteNews.
>TORONTO, June 1, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — Ontario’s Kathleen Wynne Liberals have passed what critics describe as “totalitarian” Bill 89 on the last day before Queen’s Park adjourns for the summer.>Pro-family advocates warn Bill 89 gives the state more power to seize children from families that oppose the LGBTQI and gender ideology agenda, and allows government agencies to effectively ban couples who disagree with that agenda from fostering or adopting children.>Children’s Aid agencies now have “a type of police power to bust down your door, and seize your biological children if you are known to oppose LGBT ideology and the fraudulent theory of ‘gender identity', if for instance, some claim is made that your child may be same-sex attracted or confused about their ‘gender,’” according to Fonseca.>“We already see similar tyranny happening in other jurisdictions, such as Norway, where the main child protection service there, Barnevernet, has been involved in numerous high profile seizures of children from traditionally-principled families,” he added.https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-ontario-passes-totalitarian-bill-allowing-govt-to-take-kids-from-c>Bill 89http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&BillID=4479&detailPage=bills_detail_the_bil>>33245
REEEEEE WHATS THE PURPOSE?
>It adds “gender identity” and “gender expression” as factors to be considered “in the best interests of the child.”
if only a hero as great as jeb! (allah forgive me for saying his name) was here to fix this
>>33244I was going to make a thread about this, but I was too lazy...
What's most infuriating about this is that the kikes who wrote it were clever enough to ensure that Muslims, Sikhs, and Africans would be excluded from it.
>>33244>Muslims/Sikhs are exempt because the bill is worded to consider the child's "creed".So Christianity isn't a religion anymore?
Fucking Canada, man!
>>33244Everyday I wish that something would just come and wipe us all out, and shit like this just reinforces my belief. Is this world truly ruled by Satan himself because Christ, how on earth could any of these laws be considered fair or even fucking legal for both the parents and child!? Doesn't help that they only target traditional families who hold Christian values and beliefs. They have literally abandoned all subtlety whatsoever now, haven't they?
Just what the fuck Canada?! Its like they are trying their hardest to commit national suicide.
>>33244I'm declaring war on Canada once I'm president.
pic unrelated
>>33244How on earth does this shitty bill even pretend to help anyone? Who (aside from kikes) could possibly benefit from this bullshit?
>>33519Read the whole bill, along with a few surrounding articles: it's legit.
>>33269All it takes is 16 men to get something big started.
>>33244Public school isn't enough. They have to get 'em young and alone. Only way to reeducate the future.
>>33244So now all it takes if the kid gets mad is to claim they're a special snowflake and they can get taken away from their parents. What is the world coming to. Whatever happened to parents being guardians, where they have power over the children because they're acting in the children's best interest? Certainly not all families are like this, but this is a new low on turning parents into meaningless adults, who kids aren't even obligated to respect.
>>33876Silly goyim! You don't know what's best for your own children, especially not when you hold extremist opinions that contradict what standards the government has deemed to be acceptable. Parents who hold anti-LBGTQI views are a danger to their children, as they risk corrupting their innocent, youthful minds and raising a new generation of homophobes. Such parents are not fit to raise children, and thus it is the responsibility of the government to place those children in the care of more 'tolerant' parents.
>>33573Truly terrible how most of the people making these big decisions are people who definitely don't have our best interests at heart. Honestly, I can't tell which is worse at this point anymore, Canada or Sweden.
>>34144I've been reading up on Wynne: it looks like she's basically a psychopath, and nobody in Ontario has the guts to dethrone her.