So I see a lot of people skeptical of vaccines, but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): F36C8FC1CA738FAB34F58485FBE531E3-96775.jpg (94.5 KB, 656x600, flutters amitash.jpg)
I've been loosely following astronomical developments and the general trend of discovery is that Einstein is being proved right. If there's an equally plausible alternative superior to classical mechanics I'd like to hear it.
>>284884
How can Einstein be right about speed making time slow you down, making FTL travel impossible? That just makes no sense to me.
How can Einstein be right about speed making time slow you down, making FTL travel impossible? That just makes no sense to me.
>>284880
Only by parentage, not by culture. He had relatives who happened to be jewish.
I think he just happened to be on the end of the bell curve where he doesn't exhibit the behavioral and cognitive traits we recognize as being so common in the Jewish people. For one, he had significant intelligence when it came to abstract thinking and mathematics, as opposed to primarily in linguistics.
Only by parentage, not by culture. He had relatives who happened to be jewish.
I think he just happened to be on the end of the bell curve where he doesn't exhibit the behavioral and cognitive traits we recognize as being so common in the Jewish people. For one, he had significant intelligence when it came to abstract thinking and mathematics, as opposed to primarily in linguistics.
Einstein was a plagiarist.
>>284877
>So I see a lot of people skeptical of vaccines, but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
They will use the vaccines as a way to enslave the people and this fits with the Jewish beliefs that the chosen people will each have many slaves of their own at the return of Yahweh, this is what the relativity between both of them is.
>>284880
Remember, Einstein was Jewish.
What does this have to do with the previous question you asked? You do not write sense so i suspect you to be a promoter of all the things you have written, you are asking why yet not elaborating or providing any solid arguments, literal one sentence OP with no creativity.
This is a well and true slide thread.
>So I see a lot of people skeptical of vaccines, but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
They will use the vaccines as a way to enslave the people and this fits with the Jewish beliefs that the chosen people will each have many slaves of their own at the return of Yahweh, this is what the relativity between both of them is.
>>284880
Remember, Einstein was Jewish.
What does this have to do with the previous question you asked? You do not write sense so i suspect you to be a promoter of all the things you have written, you are asking why yet not elaborating or providing any solid arguments, literal one sentence OP with no creativity.
This is a well and true slide thread.
>>284894
Yes and what about it? You give nothing to add to it yet speak of it for no reason, why did you have to make a thread about this for?
Yes and what about it? You give nothing to add to it yet speak of it for no reason, why did you have to make a thread about this for?
>>284896
BEcause I cannot believe that people still believe that nonsense. Besides, this isn't a friggin SLIDE thread. There's nothing leftist in this for starters.
BEcause I cannot believe that people still believe that nonsense. Besides, this isn't a friggin SLIDE thread. There's nothing leftist in this for starters.
>>284897
>this isnt a slide thread
Obviously, this is /mlpol/. If this was a slide thread, it'd have been nuked already
ask me how I know
But to your point;
>>284877
>So I see a lot of people skeptical of vaccines, but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
Care to clarify what you mean by Jewish relativity? Yes, there are examples ITT, but it would be better for (you) to explain what you mean than for others to intuit based off,... dodgy rhetoric.
>this isnt a slide thread
Obviously, this is /mlpol/. If this was a slide thread, it'd have been nuked already
ask me how I know
But to your point;
>>284877
>So I see a lot of people skeptical of vaccines, but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
Care to clarify what you mean by Jewish relativity? Yes, there are examples ITT, but it would be better for (you) to explain what you mean than for others to intuit based off,... dodgy rhetoric.
>>284898
Sorry - as in, the theories of special and general relativity, which were invented by Einstein as a way of explaining the shortcomings of electromagnetic theory, but have been supplanted by superstate symmetrical quantum entangelment.
Sorry - as in, the theories of special and general relativity, which were invented by Einstein as a way of explaining the shortcomings of electromagnetic theory, but have been supplanted by superstate symmetrical quantum entangelment.
>>284897
You still do not provide a good enough reason for this to be brought to attention, just because this annoys you?
I am asking you what is the importance of this subject or the lesson that can be learned from this? Is there any reason for this thread to exist?
Why is this subject so important to you?
This thread is low effort and uninformative, it provides no ideas nor does it expand upon anything other than pointing to a theory created by Einstein without elaborating upon it.
>>284900
And why does any of this matter? You do not explain why this is needed to be known and without explanation all of this aimless as you provide nothing new to the matter.
You still do not provide a good enough reason for this to be brought to attention, just because this annoys you?
I am asking you what is the importance of this subject or the lesson that can be learned from this? Is there any reason for this thread to exist?
Why is this subject so important to you?
This thread is low effort and uninformative, it provides no ideas nor does it expand upon anything other than pointing to a theory created by Einstein without elaborating upon it.
>>284900
And why does any of this matter? You do not explain why this is needed to be known and without explanation all of this aimless as you provide nothing new to the matter.
>>284901
Not taking sides/postures, but this is where I'm at too. I fail to see the utility of this thread. That's not to say there is none, but a little clarification from OP (who totally isnt a faggot, I swear) could help
Not taking sides/postures, but this is where I'm at too. I fail to see the utility of this thread. That's not to say there is none, but a little clarification from OP (who totally isnt a faggot, I swear) could help
>>284877
>but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
It's just a jewish theory with proven shortcomings like that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. If you look close onto it, it tries a rebuttal, or alternative, to the Ether theory by coming with a novel and ingenious idea what "on paper" looks sound because the math add up.
>but do you people still believe in Jewish relativity?
It's just a jewish theory with proven shortcomings like that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. If you look close onto it, it tries a rebuttal, or alternative, to the Ether theory by coming with a novel and ingenious idea what "on paper" looks sound because the math add up.
>>284911
>proven shortcomings like that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light
Nothing has ever been shown to travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. That doesn't mean, however, that wacky stuff can't happen near intense gravity wells which also happen to experience relativistic effects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_8ZMSJnP9Q, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrteawOFEo4
As for Einstein being proven right, here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v30oszbPH-k
Yes I watch a lot of this channel because it's good for keeping up with astronomy. Mind you, you may not be able to believe it, but we already can observe relativistic effects. A watch orbiting earth will be ever so slightly slower than one at the earth's surface.
>proven shortcomings like that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light
Nothing has ever been shown to travel faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. That doesn't mean, however, that wacky stuff can't happen near intense gravity wells which also happen to experience relativistic effects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_8ZMSJnP9Q, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrteawOFEo4
As for Einstein being proven right, here's an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v30oszbPH-k
Yes I watch a lot of this channel because it's good for keeping up with astronomy. Mind you, you may not be able to believe it, but we already can observe relativistic effects. A watch orbiting earth will be ever so slightly slower than one at the earth's surface.
vaccines are a conditionally prescribed tool by a groupthink of (((certified))) scientists, they arent a practical concern for the average person until theyre guilt tripped by pro-science anti-conspiracy authorities. Einstein owes more credit to european scientists than was given.
File (): 0851931A90C57795DC87751D713AB3F1-470468.png (459.4 KB, 3593x2864, pngkit_sparkle-border-png_468676.png)
Maybe I'm a retard and the maths prove it, but as far as i can tell physics has a lot of overcomplication and magic.
Time dilation can be explained by moving fast just making your atoms slow down without adding time into the mix.
Quantum states are literally just "we'll call this both until we know what it is" and they act like needing to interact with a particle to measure is some magical sci-fi shit.
Unpredictable states being random is more complicated than "there is some deterministic background mechanism we cant measure" which is what it always is outside of quantum shit, and then they cant explain what mechanism the universe has to generate the randomness. This does mean you need another way to explain why the universe isnt uniform, but a simpler explanation that also solves the matter/anti-matter asymmetry is if the universe were patterned instead of random, so on the exact opposite side of the universe there might be an anti-matter copy of you reading this.
More generally, when scientists make something physical, you can trust them because if the rocket flies, the rocket scientist knows what he's doing, otherwise you either have to understand it yourself (and it could still be wrong), or go on blind faith.
Time dilation can be explained by moving fast just making your atoms slow down without adding time into the mix.
Quantum states are literally just "we'll call this both until we know what it is" and they act like needing to interact with a particle to measure is some magical sci-fi shit.
Unpredictable states being random is more complicated than "there is some deterministic background mechanism we cant measure" which is what it always is outside of quantum shit, and then they cant explain what mechanism the universe has to generate the randomness. This does mean you need another way to explain why the universe isnt uniform, but a simpler explanation that also solves the matter/anti-matter asymmetry is if the universe were patterned instead of random, so on the exact opposite side of the universe there might be an anti-matter copy of you reading this.
More generally, when scientists make something physical, you can trust them because if the rocket flies, the rocket scientist knows what he's doing, otherwise you either have to understand it yourself (and it could still be wrong), or go on blind faith.
Relativity is one subjective component of a universal mechanism that is objectively immutable yet cant be described in terms of space/time.
>information is more fundamental than space/time
>information is more fundamental than space/time
18 replies | 2 files | 12 UUIDs | Archived