>Trump tells lawmakers he won’t sign deal to avert shutdown, demands funds for border security
>President Trump has told House Republicans he will not sign legislation that would avert a partial government shutdown, House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said Thursday.
>Trump’s opposition upends a deal that would have kept the government open through Feb. 8 but would not give the president any new money for a border wall or other border security measures.
>Trump’s opposition dramatically increases the chances of a government shutdown, which is set to start at the end of Friday unless Congress and Trump reach a deal to extend funding for the Department of Homeland Security and other major federal agencies.
http://archive.is/uMCfI
Place your bets, will there be a shutdown or not?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 5236437649F31BDD505D46BDD9FB14C2-124179.jpg (121.3 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg)
Most likely.
Good, if we had a government shutdown for the whole year we would be vastly better off. It's good that it's being done for principles too.
File (): 727221EE5899C26F2C1E9A622B7A098B-235598.gif (230.1 KB, 320x320, mmmmmmmm.gif)
>>193502
Should I believe ZOG's news?
Wouldn't be another distraction from a main issue?
I meant, the end goal is White Genocide and no borders.
Trump have been playing along with the kikes and giving us smoke and mirror until now. Why it should be different now?
Should I believe ZOG's news?
Wouldn't be another distraction from a main issue?
I meant, the end goal is White Genocide and no borders.
Trump have been playing along with the kikes and giving us smoke and mirror until now. Why it should be different now?
File (): 1959D294B8CF1134B32E4EC59CD01237-10076.jpg (9.8 KB, 262x192, everythings jews.jpg)
File (): 7652F9D95B84ABDE469D818CA43EB820-65435.jpg (63.9 KB, 582x684, the-entire-government-will-be-shut-down-quote-1.jpg)
mfw
>>193528
He sucks the dicks of kikes because he has to appear squeaky-clean in the face of media slander.
He'd be sniped if he said no to the Jews at this point.
It's up to us to tell people what "Our Greatest Ally" really is.
He sucks the dicks of kikes because he has to appear squeaky-clean in the face of media slander.
He'd be sniped if he said no to the Jews at this point.
It's up to us to tell people what "Our Greatest Ally" really is.
>>193531
>the entire government
Mostly the useless pencil pushers. Admittedly that's the majority of the government, but not the entirety of it.
>the entire government
Mostly the useless pencil pushers. Admittedly that's the majority of the government, but not the entirety of it.
>Trump threatens government shutdown ‘will last for a very long time’ if Democrats oppose House bill that includes border wall money
>President Trump warned Friday that a partial government shutdown would last “for a very long time” if Congress does not meet his demand Friday for billions in funding for his long-promised border wall in a stopgap spending measure.
>Trump suggested that Senate rules should be changed if necessary so that Republicans could pass the bill without any Democratic support.
>“The Democrats, whose votes we need in the Senate, will probably vote against Border Security and the Wall even though they know it is DESPERATELY NEEDED,” Trump wrote. “If the Dems vote no, there will be a shutdown that will last for a very long time. People don’t want Open Borders and Crime!”
>After Trump threatened Thursday to veto a Senate measure that did not contain the border funding he sought, the House hurried to appease the president, pulling together a bill that would keep the government funded through Feb. 8 while also allocating $5.7 billion for the border wall. The House bill also included nearly $8 billion for disaster relief for hurricanes and wildfires.
>Democrats, however, have enough votes in the Senate to keep that bill from advancing and have showed no signs of relenting.
http://archive.fo/Ps6hU
>President Trump warned Friday that a partial government shutdown would last “for a very long time” if Congress does not meet his demand Friday for billions in funding for his long-promised border wall in a stopgap spending measure.
>Trump suggested that Senate rules should be changed if necessary so that Republicans could pass the bill without any Democratic support.
>“The Democrats, whose votes we need in the Senate, will probably vote against Border Security and the Wall even though they know it is DESPERATELY NEEDED,” Trump wrote. “If the Dems vote no, there will be a shutdown that will last for a very long time. People don’t want Open Borders and Crime!”
>After Trump threatened Thursday to veto a Senate measure that did not contain the border funding he sought, the House hurried to appease the president, pulling together a bill that would keep the government funded through Feb. 8 while also allocating $5.7 billion for the border wall. The House bill also included nearly $8 billion for disaster relief for hurricanes and wildfires.
>Democrats, however, have enough votes in the Senate to keep that bill from advancing and have showed no signs of relenting.
http://archive.fo/Ps6hU
>Partial government shutdown assured after lawmakers leave Capitol without budget deal
>House and Senate lawmakers are leaving the Capitol on Friday evening without passing a budget deal, ensuring there will be a partial government shutdown when funding for a large number of federal agencies lapses at midnight.
>The House adjourned shortly before 7 p.m., as officials gave notice the chamber would not reconvene until noon on Saturday. Senators began leaving as well, and lawmakers from both chambers were told leaders would try to give them at least 24 hours’ notice before any votes.
>Lawmakers left amid last-minute talks between White House officials and congressional leaders, who had worked to resolve an impasse over President Trump’s demands for billions of dollars of federal funding to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
>“I hope Senate Democrats will work with the White House on an agreement that can pass both houses of Congress and then receive the president’s signature,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told other lawmakers after the vote passed 48-47, with Vice President Mike Pence breaking a tie.
>Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Democrats were open to discussions with the White House and Republicans, but he said they would not agree to any measure that funded the new construction of a border wall.
http://archive.is/IhXQL
>House and Senate lawmakers are leaving the Capitol on Friday evening without passing a budget deal, ensuring there will be a partial government shutdown when funding for a large number of federal agencies lapses at midnight.
>The House adjourned shortly before 7 p.m., as officials gave notice the chamber would not reconvene until noon on Saturday. Senators began leaving as well, and lawmakers from both chambers were told leaders would try to give them at least 24 hours’ notice before any votes.
>Lawmakers left amid last-minute talks between White House officials and congressional leaders, who had worked to resolve an impasse over President Trump’s demands for billions of dollars of federal funding to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
>“I hope Senate Democrats will work with the White House on an agreement that can pass both houses of Congress and then receive the president’s signature,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told other lawmakers after the vote passed 48-47, with Vice President Mike Pence breaking a tie.
>Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Democrats were open to discussions with the White House and Republicans, but he said they would not agree to any measure that funded the new construction of a border wall.
http://archive.is/IhXQL
It's a sad day when the party we voted for has two options, compromise with evil and stall it out, when it comes to dealing with the left.
File (): BA14A60A4CA3DBFF8B768CABBD105599-129835.png (126.8 KB, 581x595, 2f182c2c3db0e6ed9279ac15ef1fc6620c65b96a6c31f57dff87dffe741aa9a8.png)
>>193502
>Trump’s opposition upends a deal that would have kept the government open through Feb. 8 but would not give the president any new money for a border wall or other border security measures.
So I'm guessing this is 'other border security measures' because its sure not a wall
>Trump’s opposition upends a deal that would have kept the government open through Feb. 8 but would not give the president any new money for a border wall or other border security measures.
So I'm guessing this is 'other border security measures' because its sure not a wall
WE SHUTDOWN NOW
>https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-congress-government-shutdown-20181221-story.html
>https://archive.is/svACy
Roughly one-quarter of the federal government officially shut down Friday night as Congress and President Trump remained deadlocked over money for his proposed border wall, the second time in less than a year that the nation’s unyielding divisions over immigration have led to the closure of federal agencies. Lawmakers who spent Friday in fitful, inconclusive negotiations with White House officials said they would resume talks on Saturday, hoping to break the stalemate, which threatens the paychecks of some 800,000 government workers.
For now, with most government offices already closed for the weekend and the Christmas holiday, the shutdown will have limited effect, although it may hamper activities at some national parks. But if it continues for long, it could have a widening impact on the public, delaying home sales and tax refunds, closing passport offices and snarling a long list of government functions. Friday evening, House and Senate leaders sent their members home. Lawmakers leaving the Capitol indicated they were promised 24 hours’ notice before the next vote. Senate leaders agreed Friday afternoon that no plan would get a vote in the chamber until Trump and the top Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate had signed off on it. Lawmakers hoped that pact to avoid meaningless votes would smooth the process of getting a bill that could pass both chambers and be signed by the president. Lawmakers acknowledged that there was no clear pathway to resolve the standoff unless Trump drops his demands about the U.S.-Mexico border wall. To get through the Senate, any bill would need the support of nine Democrats, but the party has unanimously rejected money for the wall.
Trump has demanded $5 billion for wall construction. Senators previously agreed on $1.6 billion that could be used to upgrade existing border fences, but not to begin construction of a new border wall. In talks Friday, White House officials spoke with lawmakers about a possible package that would include the $1.6 billion. It was unclear what other elements might be included. Senate Republicans were visibly frustrated earlier Friday that Trump whipsawed them this week on whether he would insist on funds for a wall on the border. They had agreed to a spending bill earlier this week that didn’t fund the wall with the understanding that Trump would sign it. Then, the House approved $5.7 billion for the wall after Trump reversed course and demanded the money. “It would have been great if they had told us they wanted this fight, because we would have started working on it on Wednesday,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who supports the border wall funding. “They now have made that clear.”
“The key here is we have to get clarity from the president on what his priorities are,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who rarely speaks to reporters in the Capitol hallways, even paused to show off a campaign button for the “Senate Cranky Coalition." "This is the unanimous position of the Senate Republican conference at the moment," McConnell said of the pin. Within hours, half a dozen other senators were wearing the same button. Days before Christmas, lawmakers were visibly frustrated that they were stuck in Washington over a partisan dispute that would do little more than fund the government for seven weeks, a mere kick of the can. Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz flew home to Hawaii only to turn around and fly back to Washington to vote down the wall proposal.
>https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-congress-government-shutdown-20181221-story.html
>https://archive.is/svACy
Roughly one-quarter of the federal government officially shut down Friday night as Congress and President Trump remained deadlocked over money for his proposed border wall, the second time in less than a year that the nation’s unyielding divisions over immigration have led to the closure of federal agencies. Lawmakers who spent Friday in fitful, inconclusive negotiations with White House officials said they would resume talks on Saturday, hoping to break the stalemate, which threatens the paychecks of some 800,000 government workers.
For now, with most government offices already closed for the weekend and the Christmas holiday, the shutdown will have limited effect, although it may hamper activities at some national parks. But if it continues for long, it could have a widening impact on the public, delaying home sales and tax refunds, closing passport offices and snarling a long list of government functions. Friday evening, House and Senate leaders sent their members home. Lawmakers leaving the Capitol indicated they were promised 24 hours’ notice before the next vote. Senate leaders agreed Friday afternoon that no plan would get a vote in the chamber until Trump and the top Republicans and Democrats in both the House and Senate had signed off on it. Lawmakers hoped that pact to avoid meaningless votes would smooth the process of getting a bill that could pass both chambers and be signed by the president. Lawmakers acknowledged that there was no clear pathway to resolve the standoff unless Trump drops his demands about the U.S.-Mexico border wall. To get through the Senate, any bill would need the support of nine Democrats, but the party has unanimously rejected money for the wall.
Trump has demanded $5 billion for wall construction. Senators previously agreed on $1.6 billion that could be used to upgrade existing border fences, but not to begin construction of a new border wall. In talks Friday, White House officials spoke with lawmakers about a possible package that would include the $1.6 billion. It was unclear what other elements might be included. Senate Republicans were visibly frustrated earlier Friday that Trump whipsawed them this week on whether he would insist on funds for a wall on the border. They had agreed to a spending bill earlier this week that didn’t fund the wall with the understanding that Trump would sign it. Then, the House approved $5.7 billion for the wall after Trump reversed course and demanded the money. “It would have been great if they had told us they wanted this fight, because we would have started working on it on Wednesday,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), who supports the border wall funding. “They now have made that clear.”
“The key here is we have to get clarity from the president on what his priorities are,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who rarely speaks to reporters in the Capitol hallways, even paused to show off a campaign button for the “Senate Cranky Coalition." "This is the unanimous position of the Senate Republican conference at the moment," McConnell said of the pin. Within hours, half a dozen other senators were wearing the same button. Days before Christmas, lawmakers were visibly frustrated that they were stuck in Washington over a partisan dispute that would do little more than fund the government for seven weeks, a mere kick of the can. Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz flew home to Hawaii only to turn around and fly back to Washington to vote down the wall proposal.
File (): A5BE0A271D4786AF774EC55EAA90487D-231367.gif (225.9 KB, 350x350, GIF-171109_113021.gif)
File (): D2453C08AF80B4B74F337FF57F01D0D7-26381.jpg (25.8 KB, 757x117, Screenshot_15.jpg)
>>193895
I don't get all the opposition to this design. It's as effective a barrier as a concrete wall would be. There's no hand and footholds to climb it and the tops could potentially impale spics. Plus the see-through design allows them to stare through it at the beautiful land they'll never be able to reach. What's not to like?
I don't get all the opposition to this design. It's as effective a barrier as a concrete wall would be. There's no hand and footholds to climb it and the tops could potentially impale spics. Plus the see-through design allows them to stare through it at the beautiful land they'll never be able to reach. What's not to like?
>>193950
They can piss through it
They can shoot through it
Individual spikes are easier to break through than the Great Wall of China But Bigger And Better we'd dreamed of
They can piss through it
They can shoot through it
Individual spikes are easier to break through than the Great Wall of China But Bigger And Better we'd dreamed of
>>193958
Also they can reach their arms through it and do photo ops, like they're criminals behind bars or some shit.
Also they can reach their arms through it and do photo ops, like they're criminals behind bars or some shit.
>>193950
Keep in mind that the Wall is as much a symbol as it is a tool. A tall, thicc, opaque wall does a lot to say "we've had enough of illegal immigration so no more."
Keep in mind that the Wall is as much a symbol as it is a tool. A tall, thicc, opaque wall does a lot to say "we've had enough of illegal immigration so no more."
>>193950
You dont need foot-holes to climb a pole. All you need are your hands or a piece of rope like climbing up a tree. The spikes I doubt will do shit to deter anyone with , razorwire is harder to get over and if we're going by scale with the car if you got to the top of the fence then it would be easy to slip between the sharp points.
You dont need foot-holes to climb a pole. All you need are your hands or a piece of rope like climbing up a tree. The spikes I doubt will do shit to deter anyone with , razorwire is harder to get over and if we're going by scale with the car if you got to the top of the fence then it would be easy to slip between the sharp points.
>Trump vows not to reopen federal government until wall funding is secured
>President Trump said Tuesday that he intends to keep the federal government closed until he secures the desired funding from Congress for his promised border wall, and he cast doubt about the performance of Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome H. Powell after a sharp downturn in U.S. stock markets.
>About 25 percent of the government is shut down for the fourth straight day, with Congress at a stalemate over Trump’s demand for $5 billion in wall construction money.
>“I can’t tell you when the government is going to reopen,” he said. “I can tell you it’s not going to be open until we have a wall, a fence, whatever they’d like to call it. I’ll call it whatever they want. But it’s all the same thing. It’s a barrier from people pouring into our country.”
>All told, about 800,000 of 2.1 million federal workers nationwide — or more than a third — are estimated to be affected in some way by the shutdown. Trump claimed that many of them support the shutdown.
>“Many of those workers have said to me, communicated — stay out until you get the funding for the wall,” Trump said. “These federal workers want the wall.”
http://archive.is/5sEeE
>President Trump said Tuesday that he intends to keep the federal government closed until he secures the desired funding from Congress for his promised border wall, and he cast doubt about the performance of Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome H. Powell after a sharp downturn in U.S. stock markets.
>About 25 percent of the government is shut down for the fourth straight day, with Congress at a stalemate over Trump’s demand for $5 billion in wall construction money.
>“I can’t tell you when the government is going to reopen,” he said. “I can tell you it’s not going to be open until we have a wall, a fence, whatever they’d like to call it. I’ll call it whatever they want. But it’s all the same thing. It’s a barrier from people pouring into our country.”
>All told, about 800,000 of 2.1 million federal workers nationwide — or more than a third — are estimated to be affected in some way by the shutdown. Trump claimed that many of them support the shutdown.
>“Many of those workers have said to me, communicated — stay out until you get the funding for the wall,” Trump said. “These federal workers want the wall.”
http://archive.is/5sEeE
>President Donald Trump and Democrats are trading blame for the partial government shutdown but doing little substantive talking with each other as the disruption in federal services and public employees' pay slogs into another weekend.
>Trump appeared no closer to securing money for his signature border wall, which he vowed during the campaign that he would make Mexico pay for. He's failed to do so. Now Democratic leaders are adamant that they will not authorize money for the project, calling it wasteful and ineffective. They show no signs of bending, either.
>Trump tweeted: "We will be forced to close the Southern Border entirely if the Obstructionist Democrats do not give us the money to finish the Wall & also change the ridiculous immigration laws that our Country is saddled with." He also threatened to cut off U.S. aid to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, among countries he deems have not done enough to combat illegal immigration.
>Trump's incoming chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, said Democrats are no longer negotiating with the administration over an earlier offer by the White House to accept less than the $5 billion Trump wants for the wall.
>Democrats said the White House offered to accept $2.5 billion for border security, but that Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer told Vice President Mike Pence that it wasn't acceptable. It was also not guaranteed that Trump would settle for that amount.
>"There's not a single Democrat talking to the president of the United States about this deal," Mulvaney said Friday
http://archive.li/x2zcm
>Trump appeared no closer to securing money for his signature border wall, which he vowed during the campaign that he would make Mexico pay for. He's failed to do so. Now Democratic leaders are adamant that they will not authorize money for the project, calling it wasteful and ineffective. They show no signs of bending, either.
>Trump tweeted: "We will be forced to close the Southern Border entirely if the Obstructionist Democrats do not give us the money to finish the Wall & also change the ridiculous immigration laws that our Country is saddled with." He also threatened to cut off U.S. aid to El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, among countries he deems have not done enough to combat illegal immigration.
>Trump's incoming chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, said Democrats are no longer negotiating with the administration over an earlier offer by the White House to accept less than the $5 billion Trump wants for the wall.
>Democrats said the White House offered to accept $2.5 billion for border security, but that Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer told Vice President Mike Pence that it wasn't acceptable. It was also not guaranteed that Trump would settle for that amount.
>"There's not a single Democrat talking to the president of the United States about this deal," Mulvaney said Friday
http://archive.li/x2zcm
>No progress toward ending U.S. shutdown in Trump meeting with lawmakers
>No agreement came out of a meeting between U.S. congressional leaders and President Donald Trump on Wednesday to end a partial government shutdown now in its 12th day as the president stuck to his demand for $5 billion in border wall funding fiercely opposed by Democrats.
>Congressional leaders are expected to return to the White House on Friday to resume talks, signaling the shutdown will likely stretch into the weekend.
>The White House convened the meeting to try to convince Democrats that funding a wall on the southern border with Mexico was a pressing security need. Instead, Democratic leaders cut off Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Neilsen’s presentation and tried to no avail to press Trump to accept their offer.
>Pelosi said the House would proceed with plans to hold votes on Thursday, when they formally take control of the chamber from Trump’s fellow Republicans, on legislation that would end the shutdown without providing the wall money sought by Trump.
>But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said afterward on the Senate floor that the chamber would not vote on the legislation, calling it a “political sideshow” and “total nonstarter.”
>Trump’s demand for $5 billion in funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border triggered the shutdown affecting about a quarter of the federal government and 800,000 federal workers.
>Before meeting with lawmakers, Trump said the shutdown would last for “as long as it takes” as he pushes for wall money as part of any legislation to reopen agencies shuttered when their funding lapsed on Dec. 22.
http://archive.vn/qjQOq
>No agreement came out of a meeting between U.S. congressional leaders and President Donald Trump on Wednesday to end a partial government shutdown now in its 12th day as the president stuck to his demand for $5 billion in border wall funding fiercely opposed by Democrats.
>Congressional leaders are expected to return to the White House on Friday to resume talks, signaling the shutdown will likely stretch into the weekend.
>The White House convened the meeting to try to convince Democrats that funding a wall on the southern border with Mexico was a pressing security need. Instead, Democratic leaders cut off Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Neilsen’s presentation and tried to no avail to press Trump to accept their offer.
>Pelosi said the House would proceed with plans to hold votes on Thursday, when they formally take control of the chamber from Trump’s fellow Republicans, on legislation that would end the shutdown without providing the wall money sought by Trump.
>But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said afterward on the Senate floor that the chamber would not vote on the legislation, calling it a “political sideshow” and “total nonstarter.”
>Trump’s demand for $5 billion in funding for a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border triggered the shutdown affecting about a quarter of the federal government and 800,000 federal workers.
>Before meeting with lawmakers, Trump said the shutdown would last for “as long as it takes” as he pushes for wall money as part of any legislation to reopen agencies shuttered when their funding lapsed on Dec. 22.
http://archive.vn/qjQOq
>>195975
And the days, weeks, months, and years pass on.
The commander in chief cannot order the Engineer Corps to do the damned job with military money?
Cannot the US government to issue its own money as Kennedy did?
Cannot the President to deputy every willing citizen to defend the border?
This distracting BS have been running long enough.
Time to move on, we need a guy who will push for Whites' Rights and willing to hang every traitor in sight.
And the days, weeks, months, and years pass on.
The commander in chief cannot order the Engineer Corps to do the damned job with military money?
Cannot the US government to issue its own money as Kennedy did?
Cannot the President to deputy every willing citizen to defend the border?
This distracting BS have been running long enough.
Time to move on, we need a guy who will push for Whites' Rights and willing to hang every traitor in sight.
>>195981
>Cannot the US government to issue its own money as Kennedy did?
Presidents that do that tend to get assassinated. What a coincidence.
>Cannot the US government to issue its own money as Kennedy did?
Presidents that do that tend to get assassinated. What a coincidence.
>Trump Threatened to Keep Government Shut For ‘Years,’ Schumer Says
>Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said President Donald Trump threatened to keep the government shut down for “months or even years,” after a Friday meeting at the White House.
>Trump “resisted” Democrats’ demands that he reopen government, Schumer said outside the White House. “In fact, he said he’d keep the government closed for a very long time -- months or even years.”
>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was also at the meeting, said she told Trump that Democrats won’t consider his demand for money to pay for a border wall until the U.S. government is re-opened.
>“We really cannot resolve this until we open up government, and we made that clear to the president,” Pelosi told reporters after the nearly two-hour meeting.
>was not able to archive
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-03/bad-stuff-the-stock-market-worried-about-is-starting-to-happen
>Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said President Donald Trump threatened to keep the government shut down for “months or even years,” after a Friday meeting at the White House.
>Trump “resisted” Democrats’ demands that he reopen government, Schumer said outside the White House. “In fact, he said he’d keep the government closed for a very long time -- months or even years.”
>House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was also at the meeting, said she told Trump that Democrats won’t consider his demand for money to pay for a border wall until the U.S. government is re-opened.
>“We really cannot resolve this until we open up government, and we made that clear to the president,” Pelosi told reporters after the nearly two-hour meeting.
>was not able to archive
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-03/bad-stuff-the-stock-market-worried-about-is-starting-to-happen
>Trump Says He May Declare National Emergency To Build Wall
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-04/trump-could-declare-national-emergency-bypass-congress-and-build-wall
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-04/trump-could-declare-national-emergency-bypass-congress-and-build-wall
>Democrats pledge to paralyze Senate as shutdown negotiation tactic
>Senate Democrats are coalescing behind a strategy to block any legislation on the floor that doesn’t re-open the federal government — planning to paralyze the Senate as the partial government shutdown enters its third week with no end in sight.
>Privately, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has told the rest of his caucus that he would vote against advancing the first bill on the Senate floor this year, which would authorize security assistance to Israel and include provisions aimed at promoting security in the Middle East.
>House Democrats last week passed legislation that would reopen the government but deny President Trump any of the money he is demanding for a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. But Trump has said he will not sign the measure, and McConnell has repeatedly said the Senate won’t advance legislation the president won’t support.
>“The Senate should vote on nothing else until we vote to reopen the government. Period,” Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) tweeted on Monday. “This shutdown is squeezing the finances of so many Americans, including thousands of federal workers who live in Virginia. As leaders, we can’t just whistle past the graveyard of this crisis.”
http://archive.vn/mvIOs
>Senate Democrats are coalescing behind a strategy to block any legislation on the floor that doesn’t re-open the federal government — planning to paralyze the Senate as the partial government shutdown enters its third week with no end in sight.
>Privately, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has told the rest of his caucus that he would vote against advancing the first bill on the Senate floor this year, which would authorize security assistance to Israel and include provisions aimed at promoting security in the Middle East.
>House Democrats last week passed legislation that would reopen the government but deny President Trump any of the money he is demanding for a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. But Trump has said he will not sign the measure, and McConnell has repeatedly said the Senate won’t advance legislation the president won’t support.
>“The Senate should vote on nothing else until we vote to reopen the government. Period,” Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) tweeted on Monday. “This shutdown is squeezing the finances of so many Americans, including thousands of federal workers who live in Virginia. As leaders, we can’t just whistle past the graveyard of this crisis.”
http://archive.vn/mvIOs
>>196917
>Privately, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has told the rest of his caucus that he would vote against advancing the first bill on the Senate floor this year, which would authorize security assistance to Israel and include provisions aimed at promoting security in the Middle East.
Top fucking Kek.
>Privately, Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has told the rest of his caucus that he would vote against advancing the first bill on the Senate floor this year, which would authorize security assistance to Israel and include provisions aimed at promoting security in the Middle East.
Top fucking Kek.
>Trump walks out of border security meeting after Pelosi rejects wall pitch
>President Trump walked out of a White House meeting with congressional leaders Wednesday afternoon over the partial government shutdown after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi again rejected supporting new funding for a border wall, according to those in the meeting.
>“I asked what is going to happen in 30 days if I quickly open things up, are you going to approve Border Security which includes a Wall or Steel Barrier? Nancy said, NO. I said bye-bye, nothing else works!” Trump tweeted.
>Pelosi, D-Calif., said after the meeting that the president was “petulant." Schumer said Trump slammed his hand on a table in frustration, but Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans, speaking to reporters afterward, denied that happened.
http://archive.is/reok3
>President Trump walked out of a White House meeting with congressional leaders Wednesday afternoon over the partial government shutdown after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi again rejected supporting new funding for a border wall, according to those in the meeting.
>“I asked what is going to happen in 30 days if I quickly open things up, are you going to approve Border Security which includes a Wall or Steel Barrier? Nancy said, NO. I said bye-bye, nothing else works!” Trump tweeted.
>Pelosi, D-Calif., said after the meeting that the president was “petulant." Schumer said Trump slammed his hand on a table in frustration, but Vice President Mike Pence and other Republicans, speaking to reporters afterward, denied that happened.
http://archive.is/reok3
File (): B1DB0E2669DE431A151BB142EADC75CC-1099426.png (1.0 MB, 1419x860, Screenshot (175).png)
According to MSNBC (not that this was their point) if the Democrats keeps the government shutdown for five weeks they will have cost the nation more than what Trump is asking for.
File (): C3F96351061DD72BB4ACDD2A24FE1042-52486.jpg (51.3 KB, 800x800, _hmmmmmmmmmm.jpg)
>>193616
Even if he did, who else are we gonna rely on? Call me out if I’m wrong but, there’s no politicians like Trump.
Even if he did, who else are we gonna rely on? Call me out if I’m wrong but, there’s no politicians like Trump.
>I’m A Senior Trump Official, And I Hope A Long Shutdown Smokes Out The Resistance
>
>The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers.
https://archive.fo/ADcFO
https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/14/smoke-out-resistance/
Well worth the read. Is this how the burden of dysfunctional government ends? Everything has a breaking point. Is this how civilisations fail?
>
>The Daily Caller is taking the rare step of publishing this anonymous op-ed at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose career would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers.
https://archive.fo/ADcFO
https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/14/smoke-out-resistance/
Well worth the read. Is this how the burden of dysfunctional government ends? Everything has a breaking point. Is this how civilisations fail?
>>198619
Nice read. And yes only way to slim down is through tough measures. Trump needs to stand firm on this shutdown, if he gives in all is lost. Leftists never know how to slim down spending, they only know how to increase it and make citizens pay for it. I can't recall any time in history leftists have removed an agency, they might talk about removing ICE, but in reality if they ever do they will create two agencies to replace it at double the cost.
Nice read. And yes only way to slim down is through tough measures. Trump needs to stand firm on this shutdown, if he gives in all is lost. Leftists never know how to slim down spending, they only know how to increase it and make citizens pay for it. I can't recall any time in history leftists have removed an agency, they might talk about removing ICE, but in reality if they ever do they will create two agencies to replace it at double the cost.
File (): E258D1DD667E645014916CADB76B84DC-42775.png (41.8 KB, 881x346, Screenshot_2019.png)
>>198643
Looks like a judge have opened up the possibility to fire those who refuse to work.
>Federal judge: Government employees can't refuse to work unpaid during partial shutdown
>A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that government employees who have been deemed essential can't refuse to work without pay during the partial shutdown.
>U.S. District Judge Richard Leon denied a temporary restraining order that would have either forced the government pay workers or allow them the option to refuse to work while not receiving pay. Leon ruled that such an order would incite “chaos” and was against the public interest since it’s unclear how many workers would choose to still go to work without pay. He also said it could put the safety of the public in jeopardy.
>The plaintiffs in the case argued that being forced to work without pay is against the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery. They also asked that the judge prevent them from being retaliated against for not showing up to work and asked them to allow workers the ability to find other means of income while they are not being paid.
http://archive.is/JydaN
Looks like a judge have opened up the possibility to fire those who refuse to work.
>Federal judge: Government employees can't refuse to work unpaid during partial shutdown
>A federal judge on Tuesday ruled that government employees who have been deemed essential can't refuse to work without pay during the partial shutdown.
>U.S. District Judge Richard Leon denied a temporary restraining order that would have either forced the government pay workers or allow them the option to refuse to work while not receiving pay. Leon ruled that such an order would incite “chaos” and was against the public interest since it’s unclear how many workers would choose to still go to work without pay. He also said it could put the safety of the public in jeopardy.
>The plaintiffs in the case argued that being forced to work without pay is against the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery. They also asked that the judge prevent them from being retaliated against for not showing up to work and asked them to allow workers the ability to find other means of income while they are not being paid.
http://archive.is/JydaN
>>198643
This is part of why I have no issue with keeping the government closed for as long as it takes to build that Wall. Fuck government workers: lazy, incompetent fucks.
This is part of why I have no issue with keeping the government closed for as long as it takes to build that Wall. Fuck government workers: lazy, incompetent fucks.
>>198627
>if he gives in all is lost
He will absolutely lose the 2020 election if he gives up on this.
He had better build that Wall.
>if he gives in all is lost
He will absolutely lose the 2020 election if he gives up on this.
He had better build that Wall.
File (): 14E04E70409E210144E9547EC6742D8D-60146.jpg (58.7 KB, 750x509, vssz36.jpg)
Military courts on Jan 18?
Could the plan be this good?
Could the plan be this good?
>>198643
>CONFIRMED: President Trump Can Start Laying Off Furloughed Workers After 30 Days With 'Reduction In Force' Procedure
https://archive.is/7waWr
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-president-trump-can-start-laying-off-furloughed-workers-after-30-days-with-reduction-in-force-procedure/
>CONFIRMED: President Trump Can Start Laying Off Furloughed Workers After 30 Days With 'Reduction In Force' Procedure
https://archive.is/7waWr
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/confirmed-president-trump-can-start-laying-off-furloughed-workers-after-30-days-with-reduction-in-force-procedure/
>Angel moms storm Nancy Pelosi's office and demand to talk to her, but she hides from them to avoid discussion of how a border wall would have saved their childrens' lives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lco4MuH4QS8 or https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=Lco4MuH4QS8 or https://www.bitchute.com/video/YBqCgyTzjhIK
Source: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2976605
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lco4MuH4QS8 or https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=Lco4MuH4QS8 or https://www.bitchute.com/video/YBqCgyTzjhIK
Source: https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2976605
>>198619
>>198643
>>198765
Quote - John 'In the Desert' Salisbury:
1) Here's how Government projects work - For many years the FAA had a 'aviation fuel testing' area for testing firefighting equipment to put out aviation fuel flames at crash sites in Atlantic City New Jersey. In 1992 the NTSB took over that function.
2) That meant that the test site in Atlantic City could be shut down and re-purposed, right? Wrong. What they did instead was to leave the site, employees, equipment and job functions IN PLACE and renamed it the 'Aviation Firefighting Research' Lab.
3) So since 1992, the 20 workers, making over 75,000$ a year each, sat in their hangar and played cards all day because they had no work to do.
4) Why would the Government do this? Because once the Government establishes and funds a program and positions for the program, they fight with everything they've got to protect and prolong it.
5) They get help from their Congressmen and Senators, who get votes from those Fed Employees. A Senator is FINE with having someone sitting on their butt playing cards making 75K$ a year as long as he gets their vote.
6) The ENTIRE Federal Government is composed of about 15% hard workers and 80% bumps on logs. The waste in our Government is to the point that we can no longer look the other way or feel sorry for a Gov Employee that loses their job.
7) When you see @realDonaldTrump laying off 750,000 employees? This is why. He knows, as I know and many of you know, if we don't take RADICAL steps our Government is finished financially.
8) And for those that think this 750,000 fed employee layoff is the only thing that's going to happen to fed employees and their work environment in the next 6 years? Think again. We're just getting started... /End #WWG1WGA #Shutdown #MAGA
https://twitter.com/5Strat/status/1085642305128693760
Soon?
>>198643
>>198765
Quote - John 'In the Desert' Salisbury:
1) Here's how Government projects work - For many years the FAA had a 'aviation fuel testing' area for testing firefighting equipment to put out aviation fuel flames at crash sites in Atlantic City New Jersey. In 1992 the NTSB took over that function.
2) That meant that the test site in Atlantic City could be shut down and re-purposed, right? Wrong. What they did instead was to leave the site, employees, equipment and job functions IN PLACE and renamed it the 'Aviation Firefighting Research' Lab.
3) So since 1992, the 20 workers, making over 75,000$ a year each, sat in their hangar and played cards all day because they had no work to do.
4) Why would the Government do this? Because once the Government establishes and funds a program and positions for the program, they fight with everything they've got to protect and prolong it.
5) They get help from their Congressmen and Senators, who get votes from those Fed Employees. A Senator is FINE with having someone sitting on their butt playing cards making 75K$ a year as long as he gets their vote.
6) The ENTIRE Federal Government is composed of about 15% hard workers and 80% bumps on logs. The waste in our Government is to the point that we can no longer look the other way or feel sorry for a Gov Employee that loses their job.
7) When you see @realDonaldTrump laying off 750,000 employees? This is why. He knows, as I know and many of you know, if we don't take RADICAL steps our Government is finished financially.
8) And for those that think this 750,000 fed employee layoff is the only thing that's going to happen to fed employees and their work environment in the next 6 years? Think again. We're just getting started... /End #WWG1WGA #Shutdown #MAGA
https://twitter.com/5Strat/status/1085642305128693760
Soon?
File (): 1B6047CD340D44D7446A741F48CBA0FB-571533.png (558.1 KB, 3250x5000, 1422090692605.png)
>>198765
>CONFIRMED: President Trump Can Start Laying Off Furloughed Workers After 30 Days With 'Reduction In Force' Procedure
>>198769
>And for those that think this 750,000 fed employee layoff is the only thing that's going to happen to fed employees and their work environment in the next 6 years? Think again. We're just getting started…
750.000 you said?
>CONFIRMED: President Trump Can Start Laying Off Furloughed Workers After 30 Days With 'Reduction In Force' Procedure
>>198769
>And for those that think this 750,000 fed employee layoff is the only thing that's going to happen to fed employees and their work environment in the next 6 years? Think again. We're just getting started…
750.000 you said?
File (): 0F766BC00D09A41FE6DCF2159FACD71D-596609.png (582.6 KB, 1280x720, starlight-shock.png)
>>198770
How can communists make protest placards if they don't have free money, time and resources from the government?!?!?!?!
How can communists make protest placards if they don't have free money, time and resources from the government?!?!?!?!
>>198757
>Military courts on Jan 18?
>Could the plan be this good?
I really need to stock up on popcorn for tomorrow. If it happens it will be so much fun.
>>198769
>When you see @realDonaldTrump laying off 750,000 employees? This is why. He knows, as I know and many of you know, if we don't take RADICAL steps our Government is finished financially.
Gods speed to Trump. There is so many nations that needs a similar cleanup.
>Military courts on Jan 18?
>Could the plan be this good?
I really need to stock up on popcorn for tomorrow. If it happens it will be so much fun.
>>198769
>When you see @realDonaldTrump laying off 750,000 employees? This is why. He knows, as I know and many of you know, if we don't take RADICAL steps our Government is finished financially.
Gods speed to Trump. There is so many nations that needs a similar cleanup.
File (): 3604D939789F1D6636CA7C4FFBC734EF-459217.jpg (448.5 KB, 1191x1536, springfield.jpg)
>The shutdown isn't about the wall
>It's about forcing the non-essential government employees, the minions of the deep state, to quit
>because if anyone can fire the unfireable, it's Donald Trump.
Feels good
>It's about forcing the non-essential government employees, the minions of the deep state, to quit
>because if anyone can fire the unfireable, it's Donald Trump.
Feels good
File (): AF3C505B877E751A0A510BC53E0CA0E8-76912.jpg (75.1 KB, 724x1024, image0.jpg)
Absolute madman.
File (): D6839B28A5404019F4F99AD83457BBE7-48706.jpg (47.6 KB, 460x460, 1465959401397.jpg)
>>198793
>>198922
>>198810
>The President also promptly returned a full cart of luggage to Pelosi’s office.
>The luggage was returned to halls of Congress on a cart marked “military liaison.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/epic-president-trump-returns-full-cart-of-luggage-to-pelosis-office/
How long can we dance around this military stuff? D's are trapt... they authorize the wall (and their cartel is in trouble) or they face a closed court and the military courts in charge.
Wow!
>>198922
>>198810
>The President also promptly returned a full cart of luggage to Pelosi’s office.
>The luggage was returned to halls of Congress on a cart marked “military liaison.”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/01/epic-president-trump-returns-full-cart-of-luggage-to-pelosis-office/
How long can we dance around this military stuff? D's are trapt... they authorize the wall (and their cartel is in trouble) or they face a closed court and the military courts in charge.
Wow!
>>199010
>Ouch! Pelosi Was On Tarmac When Trump Cancelled “Excursion” Overseas
https://saraacarter.com/ouch-pelosi-was-on-tarmac-when-trump-cancelled-excursion-overseas/
>Ouch! Pelosi Was On Tarmac When Trump Cancelled “Excursion” Overseas
https://saraacarter.com/ouch-pelosi-was-on-tarmac-when-trump-cancelled-excursion-overseas/
https://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2014/323/bf9c4dea-8f11-4c21-ac43-a4ea226174d2.jpgJPG
Border security is an issue where the Democratic Party is suffering from schizophrenia. They were for it before they were against it. Donald Trump winning the 2016 election caused that, despite some very prominent Democrats, like Barack Obama, supporting border barriers in times past. Now, the war cry is that “a wall is an immorality.” That is coming from Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Walls are immoral. So, what about illegal aliens who murdered American citizens? Apparently, that’s not a concern; dreams of amnesty and expanded Democratic voter rolls have clouded the liberal mind.
https://youtu.be/gd3fynanB5EYouTube via @YouTube
Yet, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer appeared to have broken ranks with Pelosi, saying that it’s not a question of morality, but rather functionality and practicality. Also, a wall isn’t immoral if it protects people. Hoyer made these remarks in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier last night (via RCP):
https://youtu.be/i1SngL__YE8YouTube via @YouTube
NANCY PELOSI, (D) HOUSE SPEAKER: A wall is an immorality. It’s not who we are as a nation. It’s a wall between reality and his constituents. His supporters.
MITCH MCCONNELL, (R) SENATE MAJORITY LEADER: The speaker has recently defined a brand new dogma for the Democratic Party. Actually enforcing our immigration laws with the help of physical barriers is quote, “an immorality.” It seems like Democrats are happy to take their cues from the gentlelady from San Francisco and her extreme fringe position.
(END AUDIO)
BAIER: And do you agree with that, Mr. Leader?
HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER REP. STENY HOYER (D-MD): No. Well, I -- with that, the guy I just heard was Senator McConnell. I don’t agree.
BAIER: No, about the immorality.
HOYER: I don’t agree with that. Look, I don’t think this is an issue of morality; it’s an issue of does it work? And Senator Cornyn, Senator Graham, other members of the United States Senate have put in question whether a wall works, whether that is the best way to secure the border.
Now is -- are some restraints? We’ve supported substantial restraints. We’ve supported fencing. We’ve supported other technologies. So my own view is that this is not an issue of morality. A wall is immoral if it tries to imprison people who shouldn’t be imprisoned.
BAIER: OK.
HOYER: A wall is -- that protects people is not immoral. I think the issue is whether it works.
So, do walls work? I think they do.
Steve Guest
✔ @SteveGuest
There is no question barriers work to decrease illegal traffic.
San Diego (built 1992): Dropped 92%
El Paso (built 1993): Dropped 95%
Tucson (built 2000): Dropped 90%
Yuma (built 2005): Dropped 95%
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2019/01/17/house-majority-leader-breaks-with-pelosi-walls-arent-immoral-if-they-work-n2539189
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2979655
Border security is an issue where the Democratic Party is suffering from schizophrenia. They were for it before they were against it. Donald Trump winning the 2016 election caused that, despite some very prominent Democrats, like Barack Obama, supporting border barriers in times past. Now, the war cry is that “a wall is an immorality.” That is coming from Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Walls are immoral. So, what about illegal aliens who murdered American citizens? Apparently, that’s not a concern; dreams of amnesty and expanded Democratic voter rolls have clouded the liberal mind.
https://youtu.be/gd3fynanB5EYouTube via @YouTube
Yet, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer appeared to have broken ranks with Pelosi, saying that it’s not a question of morality, but rather functionality and practicality. Also, a wall isn’t immoral if it protects people. Hoyer made these remarks in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier last night (via RCP):
https://youtu.be/i1SngL__YE8YouTube via @YouTube
NANCY PELOSI, (D) HOUSE SPEAKER: A wall is an immorality. It’s not who we are as a nation. It’s a wall between reality and his constituents. His supporters.
MITCH MCCONNELL, (R) SENATE MAJORITY LEADER: The speaker has recently defined a brand new dogma for the Democratic Party. Actually enforcing our immigration laws with the help of physical barriers is quote, “an immorality.” It seems like Democrats are happy to take their cues from the gentlelady from San Francisco and her extreme fringe position.
(END AUDIO)
BAIER: And do you agree with that, Mr. Leader?
HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER REP. STENY HOYER (D-MD): No. Well, I -- with that, the guy I just heard was Senator McConnell. I don’t agree.
BAIER: No, about the immorality.
HOYER: I don’t agree with that. Look, I don’t think this is an issue of morality; it’s an issue of does it work? And Senator Cornyn, Senator Graham, other members of the United States Senate have put in question whether a wall works, whether that is the best way to secure the border.
Now is -- are some restraints? We’ve supported substantial restraints. We’ve supported fencing. We’ve supported other technologies. So my own view is that this is not an issue of morality. A wall is immoral if it tries to imprison people who shouldn’t be imprisoned.
BAIER: OK.
HOYER: A wall is -- that protects people is not immoral. I think the issue is whether it works.
So, do walls work? I think they do.
Steve Guest
✔ @SteveGuest
There is no question barriers work to decrease illegal traffic.
San Diego (built 1992): Dropped 92%
El Paso (built 1993): Dropped 95%
Tucson (built 2000): Dropped 90%
Yuma (built 2005): Dropped 95%
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2019/01/17/house-majority-leader-breaks-with-pelosi-walls-arent-immoral-if-they-work-n2539189
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2979655
>>199010
I wondered if the "Egypt" reference in the order from Trump that the Dems are franticly denying is a warning shot, or a message that they know.
I wondered if the "Egypt" reference in the order from Trump that the Dems are franticly denying is a warning shot, or a message that they know.
>>198922
https://youtu.be/DrhfBo8Ir6A
Nancy Pelosi and Democrat lawmakers bus stranded, driving circles around US capitol
https://youtu.be/DrhfBo8Ir6A
Nancy Pelosi and Democrat lawmakers bus stranded, driving circles around US capitol
>>199015
A quote from elsewhere:
We've all read the news, it is splashed headlines everywhere! President Trump (ya gotta love him!) Just cancled the demoncrats trip and waited till the last minute to do it. Now we all loved LOVED seeing POTUS rub their noses in it. But lets look deeper. Why were they going to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan?
Brussels is headquarters for the EU. They are embroiled in an uprising throughout the EU, yellow vest protesters. Macron is in trouble as is Merkel, and the rest.
Egypt is the home of the Muslim brotherhood, father to AQ, ISIS and Hamas.
Afghanistan is home to the Taliban which is run out of Obama's old stomping grounds, Pakistain. So the question is, why the trip? And why now? I smell a fat bus load of rats. Was the cabal calling a "session" to impliment a plan? Can they trust their comms? If not face to face in secure surroundings. So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
A quote from elsewhere:
We've all read the news, it is splashed headlines everywhere! President Trump (ya gotta love him!) Just cancled the demoncrats trip and waited till the last minute to do it. Now we all loved LOVED seeing POTUS rub their noses in it. But lets look deeper. Why were they going to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan?
Brussels is headquarters for the EU. They are embroiled in an uprising throughout the EU, yellow vest protesters. Macron is in trouble as is Merkel, and the rest.
Egypt is the home of the Muslim brotherhood, father to AQ, ISIS and Hamas.
Afghanistan is home to the Taliban which is run out of Obama's old stomping grounds, Pakistain. So the question is, why the trip? And why now? I smell a fat bus load of rats. Was the cabal calling a "session" to impliment a plan? Can they trust their comms? If not face to face in secure surroundings. So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
>>199024
>Nancy Pelosi and Democrat lawmakers bus stranded, driving circles around US capitol
lol
>>199026
>So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
I hope so, but I like to think MI had her under control also if they had let her go (no shutdown). It is strange how hard they are refusing going to Egypt especially.
>Nancy Pelosi and Democrat lawmakers bus stranded, driving circles around US capitol
lol
>>199026
>So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
I hope so, but I like to think MI had her under control also if they had let her go (no shutdown). It is strange how hard they are refusing going to Egypt especially.
File (): E0DBEEAF82D212BE2FCFE2D164BD662D-143962.mp4 (140.6 KB, Resolution:1050x842 Length:00:00:00, DlwkW8iWwAAXJXD.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>199026
>But lets look deeper. Why were they going to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan?
Indeed.
This is the equivalent of Obama touring America's allies after he left office to carry the message of the overlords that everything will be all right.
>So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
No until Trump has the balls to arrest everybody for treason, otherwise it is just a show.
>But lets look deeper. Why were they going to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan?
Indeed.
This is the equivalent of Obama touring America's allies after he left office to carry the message of the overlords that everything will be all right.
>So I ask, did we just dodge a bullet?
No until Trump has the balls to arrest everybody for treason, otherwise it is just a show.
File (): F29C93C5B4F38809203CB05162A2444B-215808.png (210.8 KB, 1301x839, screenshot-twitter.com-2019.01.19-03-39-44.png)
File (): FD07442E28947B9FEE4419D0C1725180-2303587.mp4 (2.2 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:31, Trump promises 'major announcement' on border security-owjbE8Ju84I.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>President Trump on Friday tweeted that he’ll make “a major announcement” Saturday afternoon concerning the ongoing partial government shutdown and the “humanitarian crisis” on the southern border.
>The announcement will occur at 3 p.m. at the White House, the president said.
http://archive.is/hLTuB
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1086395559504764930
>The announcement will occur at 3 p.m. at the White House, the president said.
http://archive.is/hLTuB
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1086395559504764930
File (): BFB8581C8D3AA2BBC4EF077E74223C9E-85033.jpg (83.0 KB, 1079x617, image (5).jpg)
File (): C8AA9E03D54BFD16D2536B8C0DEAB3EC-17042.jpg (16.6 KB, 318x303, dumbsincum.jpg)
File (): CDB8C14A538CA42526463FF620EDEABA-880416.png (859.8 KB, 2400x2400, 1507249798546-2.png)
File (): 99A51CEFC1FDC5592B9AA938266C4D00-12786.png (12.5 KB, 562x356, Untitled.png)
File (): D728A56CB382C790DCCFB95FA82E0121-597683.png (583.7 KB, 800x800, 187234.png)
File (): 02910DCB6762D56EB15765356BCCD612-269122.gif (262.8 KB, 600x304, 1478578028564.gif)
File (): 1F402223B3BD7A81602CB1D49C455340-51926.jpg (50.7 KB, 946x522, DxUmGYCX4AEJeX0.jpg:large.jpg)
he chickened out and passed the spending bill. What a shame. I was hoping to see the shutdown last long enough to see EBT cards start failing and massive food riots as a result.
>>200915
You're missing the subtlety of the deal. The govt is only "up and running" for 3 weeks. Pelosi said "no deal until the govt reopens". So now, she has 3 weeks to cough it up, or Trump is vindicated for using executive action to make it happen.
You're missing the subtlety of the deal. The govt is only "up and running" for 3 weeks. Pelosi said "no deal until the govt reopens". So now, she has 3 weeks to cough it up, or Trump is vindicated for using executive action to make it happen.
File (): 1D6A5CBDD44B4230A3BE171CDF4641BE-22503.jpg (22.0 KB, 360x140, 189700.jpg)
File (): D75375E4EA8A954152FDED2F32A09F48-158299.png (154.6 KB, 966x828, 98982647834.png)
File (): 098A669C61527E6DB66F1A2A77489C35-557663.jpg (544.6 KB, 1080x2280, 1548196187837.jpg)
>>201009
It's less that I want people to starve and more that I want more normalfags to wake up to how many niggers just sit around all day leeching off of our tax dollars as a way of life. They don't deserve any of my tax dollars.
It's less that I want people to starve and more that I want more normalfags to wake up to how many niggers just sit around all day leeching off of our tax dollars as a way of life. They don't deserve any of my tax dollars.
>>201163
The best option will be to prevent their reproduction, as it is mostly an IQ issue, but, fucking kikes.
The best option will be to prevent their reproduction, as it is mostly an IQ issue, but, fucking kikes.
File (): 9ACAACF17004E77C47EDCC7FDBF513E7-1375844.gif (1.3 MB, 801x611, _angry RaRaRaRa.gif)
>>201163
>I want more normalfags to wake up to how many niggers just sit around all day leeching off of our tax dollars as a way of life.
An 2017 anecdote, furniture store in Queens NY, plenty of Muslim customers, among them an Imam from a local mosque went with a frequency of around every 20 days to buy stuff for the new "arrivals", not sure if the payment was from the City or NY State. And the most outrageous case that I know, was a old Puerto Rican woman looking like a homeless buying a complete bedroom set with marble on top for 5 grands and delivered to a three bedroom apartment where she was living alone, everything paid by the city of NY.
I know there are plenty of people homeless or in great need, but if you have connections in the government to put you on some of their social programs, you can live almost for free.
>I want more normalfags to wake up to how many niggers just sit around all day leeching off of our tax dollars as a way of life.
An 2017 anecdote, furniture store in Queens NY, plenty of Muslim customers, among them an Imam from a local mosque went with a frequency of around every 20 days to buy stuff for the new "arrivals", not sure if the payment was from the City or NY State. And the most outrageous case that I know, was a old Puerto Rican woman looking like a homeless buying a complete bedroom set with marble on top for 5 grands and delivered to a three bedroom apartment where she was living alone, everything paid by the city of NY.
I know there are plenty of people homeless or in great need, but if you have connections in the government to put you on some of their social programs, you can live almost for free.
Still no wall and still no funding but for fucks sake what the hell is Trump waiting to show the world that he's got balls and not afraid to go hard mode instead of playing by their rules?
>>197674
Hes nothing more than the lesser evil and atleast somewhat based.
Basically a useful idiot, nothing more, nothing less.
Hes nothing more than the lesser evil and atleast somewhat based.
Basically a useful idiot, nothing more, nothing less.
>>201419
FFS germany, he's appealing to moderates and trying to affect the 'bigger person' in the exchange. Give it a second, he's still got 2 more years to wreck shop
FFS germany, he's appealing to moderates and trying to affect the 'bigger person' in the exchange. Give it a second, he's still got 2 more years to wreck shop
>>201435
>Waaah, I'm not getting everything I could possibly ever want out of a politician, everything is ruined
>Waaaah, people still haven't given up on him and I don't like things
Cry some moar
>Waaah, I'm not getting everything I could possibly ever want out of a politician, everything is ruined
>Waaaah, people still haven't given up on him and I don't like things
Cry some moar
>>201449
>>201435
The "golden mean" of this argument is that Trump has legitimately nationalistic beliefs, but does not consider them existential as we do and/or is constrained from doing anything meaningful by the Deep State.
In any case, Trump is good for what he represents but like any politician cannot be relied upon.
>>201435
The "golden mean" of this argument is that Trump has legitimately nationalistic beliefs, but does not consider them existential as we do and/or is constrained from doing anything meaningful by the Deep State.
In any case, Trump is good for what he represents but like any politician cannot be relied upon.
>>201456
And what would you have? A politician who ran on "Gas the kikes, race war nao?". They'd get obliterated by Beto, or Harris, or heaven forbid Hillary. Have some grasp of the dynamic before you decide to dismiss people who have appreciation and introspection about how things are progressing as being 'magapedes'.
And what would you have? A politician who ran on "Gas the kikes, race war nao?". They'd get obliterated by Beto, or Harris, or heaven forbid Hillary. Have some grasp of the dynamic before you decide to dismiss people who have appreciation and introspection about how things are progressing as being 'magapedes'.
105 replies | 33 files | 37 UUIDs | Archived