https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html
https://skunkbayweather.blogspot.com/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5834111/A-secret-missile-launch-Mystery-streak-light-spotted-Washington-state-island.html
https://qanon.pub/
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 2339EA7013A1341ECFD627A263E1FC4E-34799.jpg (34.0 KB, 770x433, 64b4356d5c829e27078c281d0b….jpg)
File (): 69FAB6B861228B50BA4C79F7F5E5F677-1618521.png (1.5 MB, 1346x1060, 64e77a19abcb02f353a02f8946….png)
File (): D10F6D99B2E8981A87D4F47D42A9BDFC-16179.jpg (15.8 KB, 634x490, ff330e0fed6daad8f0bf17272f….jpg)
File (): 75AEF8EB09180719B0B842C25E5A81B0-198401.jpg (193.8 KB, 1536x1476, 747275257038071e78aad9541….jpeg)
File (): 9ED8D3BD312387FCF9D3A1F717465504-11364.png (11.1 KB, 621x160, f0eb7d33886363810b6e951575….png)
>This was from a sub, former Oak Harbor / Navy fag here. This base does not have ICBMs
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1718008.html#1718448
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/12/mystery-object-spotted-over-washington-state-island-military-denies-missile-launch.html
>The fact that I am having a meeting is a major loss for the U.S., say the haters & losers. We have our hostages, testing, research and all missle launches have stoped, and these pundits, who have called me wrong from the beginning, have nothing else they can say! We will be fine!
missle .. stoped
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1006296018210603008
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1718008.html#1718448
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/06/12/mystery-object-spotted-over-washington-state-island-military-denies-missile-launch.html
>The fact that I am having a meeting is a major loss for the U.S., say the haters & losers. We have our hostages, testing, research and all missle launches have stoped, and these pundits, who have called me wrong from the beginning, have nothing else they can say! We will be fine!
missle .. stoped
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1006296018210603008
>>153149
Oh fuck, it's that mistake-code from Series of Unfortunate Events 3.
That missile's going to hit something big.
Oh fuck, it's that mistake-code from Series of Unfortunate Events 3.
That missile's going to hit something big.
>>153142
To hack a missile would have been fairly hard. If there was a launch, it would have to have either of been a manual launch, or we would have seen the results by now(downed aircraft, hard target hit, etc.). To hack a missile would have required an objective that would have exploded by now. Since there have been no indications of something taken out, it would have had to of been a manual launch. It is unlikely that it would have been an interception as there would have been great military irregularities and panic. Maybe it was for testing or another purpose? Maybe it was not a missile at all, but something else? It's not a helicopter, that's for sure.
To hack a missile would have been fairly hard. If there was a launch, it would have to have either of been a manual launch, or we would have seen the results by now(downed aircraft, hard target hit, etc.). To hack a missile would have required an objective that would have exploded by now. Since there have been no indications of something taken out, it would have had to of been a manual launch. It is unlikely that it would have been an interception as there would have been great military irregularities and panic. Maybe it was for testing or another purpose? Maybe it was not a missile at all, but something else? It's not a helicopter, that's for sure.
File (): A1DEB4EA7B67B9A8FEDEB6DF69C846BB-89752.png (87.6 KB, 707x554, 91bb9d8286bdfdf1b546133275….png)
>Not a Rocket or Missile signature. Looks like an Electromagnetic Railgun Projectile. 2016 Navy Info Release says they are similar to a Sabot Round fired by a Tank. I know what a Sabot round looks like, 105 and 120,, I have fired a couple of thousand. And by that statement they mean it is a kinetic energy projectile. And they do look like that when captured on camera fired at night. Plus, in April 2016 the Navy announced they would be conducting Electromagnetic Warfare Training on Whidbey in the future to train Growler Pilots in Electromagnetic Warfare. Considering the Electromagnetic Railgun max effective range is 50 times the range of a sabot fired from a main gun on an Abrams, Ill call it an Electromagnetic Railgun Projectile since all the evidence points to that.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1718734.html#1719178
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1718734.html#1719178
>>153161
Indeed! And how was it "stoped"?
Looking at rail guns, the projectile should not leave a streak. But if it is a night cam then perhaps that is a heat trail giving off infrared. Maybe it was not aimed, it was just enough to show they could? Also what if they did not hack the launcher itself but hacked the comms to human operators? Many questions no authoritative answers.
Indeed! And how was it "stoped"?
Looking at rail guns, the projectile should not leave a streak. But if it is a night cam then perhaps that is a heat trail giving off infrared. Maybe it was not aimed, it was just enough to show they could? Also what if they did not hack the launcher itself but hacked the comms to human operators? Many questions no authoritative answers.
Also who makes the most electronics, that might get used in high tech devices? China?
>>153162
>Many questions no authoritative answers.
Indeed
>>153165
China would likely have made some of the basic parts, that's true. The majority of the finished parts and assembly would have been US domestic however. Then again, the Chinese have gotten into the actual naval stations and other production sites. Maybe it was a China hack?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/06/12/senator-says-chinese-hack-navy-contractor-very-serious.html
>Many questions no authoritative answers.
Indeed
>>153165
China would likely have made some of the basic parts, that's true. The majority of the finished parts and assembly would have been US domestic however. Then again, the Chinese have gotten into the actual naval stations and other production sites. Maybe it was a China hack?
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/06/12/senator-says-chinese-hack-navy-contractor-very-serious.html
File (): 097B492F2B75F7CD655A703C62B331DE-1863161.png (1.8 MB, 1920x1080, fake and gay.png)
>Hacked
File (): 5B57929A2EEE4CF5AC375BE63E1660D6-44482.jpg (43.4 KB, 534x401, 636389863191575774-AP-Sing….jpg)
>>153166
I am wondering if cyber warfare has reached the Navy.
>SAN FRANCISCO — Was a hack attack behind two separate instances of Navy ships colliding with commercial vessels in the past two months? Experts say it’s highly unlikely, but not impossible — and the Navy is investigating.
>Rumors on Twitter and in computer security circles have been swirling about the possibility that cyber attacks or jamming were involved in the collisions. Speculation has been fueled by four accidents involving a U.S. warship this year, two of which were fatal, the highly-computerized nature of modern maritime navigation, and heightened concern over global cyberattacks — especially attacks against U.S. government entities.
>Chief of naval operations Admiral John Richardson said in a tweet on Monday there was no indication of the possibility of cyber intrusion or sabotage but the "review will consider all possibilities." It had been retweeted over 830 times by Wednesday.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/08/23/could-hackers-behind-u-s-navy-collisions/594107001/
Would the Navy publicly admit they are being hacked?
I am wondering if cyber warfare has reached the Navy.
>SAN FRANCISCO — Was a hack attack behind two separate instances of Navy ships colliding with commercial vessels in the past two months? Experts say it’s highly unlikely, but not impossible — and the Navy is investigating.
>Rumors on Twitter and in computer security circles have been swirling about the possibility that cyber attacks or jamming were involved in the collisions. Speculation has been fueled by four accidents involving a U.S. warship this year, two of which were fatal, the highly-computerized nature of modern maritime navigation, and heightened concern over global cyberattacks — especially attacks against U.S. government entities.
>Chief of naval operations Admiral John Richardson said in a tweet on Monday there was no indication of the possibility of cyber intrusion or sabotage but the "review will consider all possibilities." It had been retweeted over 830 times by Wednesday.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2017/08/23/could-hackers-behind-u-s-navy-collisions/594107001/
Would the Navy publicly admit they are being hacked?
File (): 38333EDC299CFEB8665735372BDF6ABB-96118.png (93.9 KB, 480x480, 1496445273704.png)
>>153174
>Argument against
1. Unlikely missiles can be hacked on takeoff
The missiles themselves tend to be tomahawk guided missiles made directly by the MIC not foreign purchased meaning that malware being implemented in them would be unlikely. The firing system has not been upgraded since the 1970s since they were introduced and even though the guidance system has been updated 3 times it would seem unlikely that it would be vulnerable.
2. No state actor is stupid enough to
Hacking infrastructure or operating on foreign powers in information warfare is one thing, but attacking a military target in a hacking attack is suicidal since out of all actors this is the most likely to cause harm and retaliation. The pinch test is that this is something we could go to war over, so if you haven't heard shit about it, then it likely isn't a foreign power that did it. Add that with Russia and China being the only ones really capable that might want to, and that the missile did jack shit, mean its even more unlikely. On top of that add that the US is opening up with the norks, something both powers want, and it'd be very unlikely that they'd do it.
>inb4 what about other powers or say a terrorist
Other powers might be more included at this point, such as the UK, France, or Nermany but are not as well equipped, that is besides the UK. And then you need to ask yourself why would the UK attack a military target instead of just apply information warfare tools instead, something less likely to get backlash if they were caught? To piss of the US into throwing off the nork shit or sanctions? Doesn't seem like it fits together honestly given that May isn't anywhere near as willing to sabtagoge her relation with Trump as the other two.
Terrorist on the other hand just don't have the capabilities to attack a state to this degree. Infrastructure, sure. Military guided missiles. No.
What does that leave us with? Human error or the navy wanted to shoot a missile. That or ayylmaos, which are as fake as skeletons.
>Argument against
1. Unlikely missiles can be hacked on takeoff
The missiles themselves tend to be tomahawk guided missiles made directly by the MIC not foreign purchased meaning that malware being implemented in them would be unlikely. The firing system has not been upgraded since the 1970s since they were introduced and even though the guidance system has been updated 3 times it would seem unlikely that it would be vulnerable.
2. No state actor is stupid enough to
Hacking infrastructure or operating on foreign powers in information warfare is one thing, but attacking a military target in a hacking attack is suicidal since out of all actors this is the most likely to cause harm and retaliation. The pinch test is that this is something we could go to war over, so if you haven't heard shit about it, then it likely isn't a foreign power that did it. Add that with Russia and China being the only ones really capable that might want to, and that the missile did jack shit, mean its even more unlikely. On top of that add that the US is opening up with the norks, something both powers want, and it'd be very unlikely that they'd do it.
>inb4 what about other powers or say a terrorist
Other powers might be more included at this point, such as the UK, France, or Nermany but are not as well equipped, that is besides the UK. And then you need to ask yourself why would the UK attack a military target instead of just apply information warfare tools instead, something less likely to get backlash if they were caught? To piss of the US into throwing off the nork shit or sanctions? Doesn't seem like it fits together honestly given that May isn't anywhere near as willing to sabtagoge her relation with Trump as the other two.
Terrorist on the other hand just don't have the capabilities to attack a state to this degree. Infrastructure, sure. Military guided missiles. No.
What does that leave us with? Human error or the navy wanted to shoot a missile. That or ayylmaos, which are as fake as skeletons.
>>153168
>Would the Navy publicly admit they are being hacked?
Nope. The only real counter argument I can think of is that if the navy was being hacked it should have leaked by now. The media is in the pentagon, than the Trump administration can't keep a lid on anything.
>>153167
Hacks are happening, but was this a specific hack, or something else? The official narrative that this might be a helicopter is BS.
>Would the Navy publicly admit they are being hacked?
Nope. The only real counter argument I can think of is that if the navy was being hacked it should have leaked by now. The media is in the pentagon, than the Trump administration can't keep a lid on anything.
>>153167
Hacks are happening, but was this a specific hack, or something else? The official narrative that this might be a helicopter is BS.
>>153169
I'm a bit late with a reply, but I find the prospect of a rogue element in the military to be more likely than hacking a sub's missile system. Someone more loyal to the cause of globalization than to the states. It's common knowledge that the government is crawling with stooges like the FBI's Peter Strzok who have no qualms about abandoning their oaths to do anything in their power to get Trump out of office. It's not much of a stretch to think that there may be members of the military who would take a shot at Trump if the opportunity arose.
I'm a bit late with a reply, but I find the prospect of a rogue element in the military to be more likely than hacking a sub's missile system. Someone more loyal to the cause of globalization than to the states. It's common knowledge that the government is crawling with stooges like the FBI's Peter Strzok who have no qualms about abandoning their oaths to do anything in their power to get Trump out of office. It's not much of a stretch to think that there may be members of the military who would take a shot at Trump if the opportunity arose.
File (): 166730053B016AA81C7112EDDB76A9F1-149869.png (146.4 KB, 834x500, june_15_ban.png)
>>153746
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/175326304
This is from some guy on /x/ who got himself banned from /pol/ for making a thread that laughs at the official explanation of the object being a helicopter.
Granted, it's not the highest quality thread, but it's something that the 4pol mods struck down with lightning speed while all sorts of shillposting and slide threads are being allowed to persist.
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/175326304
This is from some guy on /x/ who got himself banned from /pol/ for making a thread that laughs at the official explanation of the object being a helicopter.
Granted, it's not the highest quality thread, but it's something that the 4pol mods struck down with lightning speed while all sorts of shillposting and slide threads are being allowed to persist.
File (): 6A9645E3940F23A9399B6C9D82966932-1767886.jpg (1.7 MB, 1920x2220, 1529117324598.jpg)
>>153748
Guess I got my timezones mixed up a bit when checking how long that thread was alive.
There appears to be a thread on 4pol on the topic right now, so the mods must be asleep if they are actively trying to shoah the topic.
Guess I got my timezones mixed up a bit when checking how long that thread was alive.
There appears to be a thread on 4pol on the topic right now, so the mods must be asleep if they are actively trying to shoah the topic.
I skimmed the thread, and there is one possibility that I don't see mentioned.
Assuming that there was some kind of failed missile attack, the observed missile isn't necessarily the offensive threat. The missile launch captured by the camera may have been an interceptor that thwarted the attack.
Assuming that there was some kind of failed missile attack, the observed missile isn't necessarily the offensive threat. The missile launch captured by the camera may have been an interceptor that thwarted the attack.
>>153853
Do we know if subs intercept missiles?
Heres another discussion at 8/qr/
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1720994.html
Do we know if subs intercept missiles?
Heres another discussion at 8/qr/
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1720994.html
>>153859
I'm not aware of subs normally acting in that role, but it's a trick that I'd like to have in my back pocket if I were the military.
I'm not an expert on the matter, but one of our newer ship launched surface to air missiles is the RIM-174 "Standard Missile 6." It's a surface to air missile intended for targeting aircraft and anti-ship missiles. These missiles are supposed to be able to make use of targeting data from other navy assets. I think that the poster-child of showing off that feature is an F-35 keeping all of its panels buttoned up to remain stealthy as it relays targeting data to guided missile destroyers.
I'm not aware of submarines launching the SM-6. It's certainly not a missile that you can launch from under water. Can a sub carry one, launch it while surfaced, and let some other Navy asset provide the missile with targeting data? Maybe? That strikes me as something within the realm of possibility.
I'm not aware of subs normally acting in that role, but it's a trick that I'd like to have in my back pocket if I were the military.
I'm not an expert on the matter, but one of our newer ship launched surface to air missiles is the RIM-174 "Standard Missile 6." It's a surface to air missile intended for targeting aircraft and anti-ship missiles. These missiles are supposed to be able to make use of targeting data from other navy assets. I think that the poster-child of showing off that feature is an F-35 keeping all of its panels buttoned up to remain stealthy as it relays targeting data to guided missile destroyers.
I'm not aware of submarines launching the SM-6. It's certainly not a missile that you can launch from under water. Can a sub carry one, launch it while surfaced, and let some other Navy asset provide the missile with targeting data? Maybe? That strikes me as something within the realm of possibility.
>>153862
I should add that the physical dimensions of the SM-6 are smaller than the trident missiles that our missile subs are known to carry. The trident is ~twice as long and ~four times wider than the SM-6. I assume that it is possible to rig up the necessary hardware to fire an SM-6 from one of those tubes, but that's just speculation on my part.
I should add that the physical dimensions of the SM-6 are smaller than the trident missiles that our missile subs are known to carry. The trident is ~twice as long and ~four times wider than the SM-6. I assume that it is possible to rig up the necessary hardware to fire an SM-6 from one of those tubes, but that's just speculation on my part.
>>153864
With imformation abou the camera we should be able to get the angular size of the missile. With the camera position and the minimum/maximum range of a sub position we could get the min/max size of the missile. The 20 sec time exposure might distort this measurement.
?
With imformation abou the camera we should be able to get the angular size of the missile. With the camera position and the minimum/maximum range of a sub position we could get the min/max size of the missile. The 20 sec time exposure might distort this measurement.
?
>Skunk Bay Missile Crisis: Image captured in Hansville sparks alt-right conspiracy theories
https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/2018/06/15/hansville-image-alt-right-conspiracy-theories/705425002/
(archive failed)
https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/2018/06/15/hansville-image-alt-right-conspiracy-theories/705425002/
(archive failed)
File (): 13FC5222AFA80C33605234576BCAEB95-30033.jpg (29.3 KB, 572x515, lights.jpg)
File (): 82FBE99A4EC014C9651C34C87AE9B9F9-83255.jpg (81.3 KB, 630x447, lights_1.jpg)
File (): 592B1BEBAF3455D47C1A13DFE5FF74A7-1817182.png (1.7 MB, 1920x600, lights_2.png)
File (): 2D6CEB94CE8A8BBCF337A1E914EB2920-380146.jpg (371.2 KB, 1024x683, lights_3.jpg)
>>153870
If it was helicopter captured by long exposure, I would expect to see traces of the green and red lights that are used to signal the location and orientation of the aircraft.
I see no trace of red or green anywhere near the "helicopter"
If it was helicopter captured by long exposure, I would expect to see traces of the green and red lights that are used to signal the location and orientation of the aircraft.
I see no trace of red or green anywhere near the "helicopter"
File (): 89B3C3FBB8E9B09BD464B7835F774AA0-52830.png (51.6 KB, 200x218, 1527469636165.png)
>>153142
Technically they didn't lie, it was probably a kinetic missile because it probably had no payload.
It's starting to get late, nothing will likely happen today so it's best to go to bed and catch the details later after the official navy reports are released.
Technically they didn't lie, it was probably a kinetic missile because it probably had no payload.
It's starting to get late, nothing will likely happen today so it's best to go to bed and catch the details later after the official navy reports are released.
File (): 6758D7F695A174BC8D9CC7344DBAE6CC-415868.png (406.1 KB, 998x598, is_this_a_helicopter.png)
I'm sharing this helicopter meme. Put it in your "I'm going to remember that thing that they tried to memory hole" collection.
File (): C0BAC107A70AA79FEA18FF77AB438560-202956.jpg (198.2 KB, 1600x900, DSC03471.JPG)
…
>To make things stranger, meteorologist Cliff Mass posted an unnerving image of a U.S. Coast Guard cutter seen patrolling the area surrounding the location of the weather cameras which originally captured the “launch.” Mass asks “If this was just an innocent helicopter passage at night, why all the snooping on weather-loving Greg Johnson?” Why indeed, Cliff? Why indeed. Unless, of course, it was related to whatever search and rescue operation for which the helicopter was dispatched.
…
https://archive.is/bKS3K
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2018/06/missile-caught-on-camera-leads-to-assassination-conspiracy-theory/
>But there is something that continues to be unnerving.
>A Coast Guard cutter has been stalking offshore of the Skunk Bay weather location (see below). If this was just an innocent helicopter passage at night, why all the snooping on weather-loving Greg Johnson? I will let the conspiracy theory crowd run with this.
https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/mystery-missile-launch-explained.html
>To make things stranger, meteorologist Cliff Mass posted an unnerving image of a U.S. Coast Guard cutter seen patrolling the area surrounding the location of the weather cameras which originally captured the “launch.” Mass asks “If this was just an innocent helicopter passage at night, why all the snooping on weather-loving Greg Johnson?” Why indeed, Cliff? Why indeed. Unless, of course, it was related to whatever search and rescue operation for which the helicopter was dispatched.
…
https://archive.is/bKS3K
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2018/06/missile-caught-on-camera-leads-to-assassination-conspiracy-theory/
>But there is something that continues to be unnerving.
>A Coast Guard cutter has been stalking offshore of the Skunk Bay weather location (see below). If this was just an innocent helicopter passage at night, why all the snooping on weather-loving Greg Johnson? I will let the conspiracy theory crowd run with this.
https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/mystery-missile-launch-explained.html
File (): A9DB73387131D9A826609985F93AD0B7-6145246.jpg (5.9 MB, 4488x2820, 8109c73577b9631df586d090dc….jpg)
Source of other image: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1714951.html#1715654
File (): 947FBD2B21FD3A86F5A06D0562886CDB-6015990.png (5.7 MB, 3292x2188, 01dd7d59c4c565a883fa5ce21c….png)
>>153747
it is fucking incredible!
pedogate, pizzagate, elsagate, gamergate
podesta, the kalergi plan, and a lot of shit that belongs in 4chan /pol/ gets you banned !
i have been banned there, permanently, and i have a static IP ( Merci Free!) and holy shit the control 4chan pushes on real info really proves that the shareblue and democrat shills are still active and dealing with the staff directly!
4chan is really DEAD!
it is fucking incredible!
pedogate, pizzagate, elsagate, gamergate
podesta, the kalergi plan, and a lot of shit that belongs in 4chan /pol/ gets you banned !
i have been banned there, permanently, and i have a static IP ( Merci Free!) and holy shit the control 4chan pushes on real info really proves that the shareblue and democrat shills are still active and dealing with the staff directly!
4chan is really DEAD!
the NWO threat is still there and this worries me. the right major crisis is upon us.
>>156525
The Right is an emergent reaction that occurs in the minds of humans, it will still happen without 4chan.
Re 4chan:
Q !ITPb.qbhqo No.10956085
Nov 25 2017 13:54:45 (EST)
Test
Test
4Chan infiltrated.
Future posts will be relayed here.
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: f240d5 No.1952168
Jun 28 2018 22:54:56 (EST)
Coordinated effort to ramp pro violent attacks (4ch 8ch /pol/) (threads).
Mods controlled (4ch).
Staged to frame pro POTUS supporters.
Push violence (trap).
Shareblue.
Coordinated RL attacks (link).
Cause & Effect.
MSM outcry to force action.
It’s already begun (small > large).
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dark-parts-of-internet-celebrate-capital-gazette-shooting_us_5b3547bae4b007aa2f7e7226📁
Anticipated.
Goal?
Ready David?
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: b3cfa0 No.1725084
Jun 12 2018 23:41:17 (EST)
MSM attacks.
[Round 2]
MOSSAD attempts failed.
Clown attempts failed.
Expect bigger push.
FBI (4) open investigations.
8ch risk (DDOS_+_inject).
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONGER.
TOGETHER YOU CONTROL NARRATIVE & RESPONSE.
PEOPLE RESPOND TO LOGIC/FACTS.
PEOPLE SLEEPING ATTACH TO OPINION/PERSONALITY/GROUP THINK.
FEAR IS REAL.
FEAR [re: Twitter throttling & shadowban (coded #Qanon)
FEAR [re: 4ch mods + remove/replace - controlled]
FEAR [re: Reddit mods + remove/replace - controlled]
FEAR [re: MSM conspiracy push 1 - controlled]
FEAR [re: FB remove/replace - controlled]
Quiet attempts to shut down will become public & loud.
Strength TOGETHER (primary purpose).
DO NOT BE SILENT (MAJORITY).
They are losing control.
POWER W/ THE PEOPLE.
GREAT AWAKENING.
TRUTH.
GOOD V EVIL.
WWG1WGA.
TRUST YOURSELF.
Q
"The raised nail gets hammered down."
The Right is an emergent reaction that occurs in the minds of humans, it will still happen without 4chan.
Re 4chan:
Q !ITPb.qbhqo No.10956085
Nov 25 2017 13:54:45 (EST)
Test
Test
4Chan infiltrated.
Future posts will be relayed here.
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: f240d5 No.1952168
Jun 28 2018 22:54:56 (EST)
Coordinated effort to ramp pro violent attacks (4ch 8ch /pol/) (threads).
Mods controlled (4ch).
Staged to frame pro POTUS supporters.
Push violence (trap).
Shareblue.
Coordinated RL attacks (link).
Cause & Effect.
MSM outcry to force action.
It’s already begun (small > large).
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dark-parts-of-internet-celebrate-capital-gazette-shooting_us_5b3547bae4b007aa2f7e7226📁
Anticipated.
Goal?
Ready David?
Q
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: b3cfa0 No.1725084
Jun 12 2018 23:41:17 (EST)
MSM attacks.
[Round 2]
MOSSAD attempts failed.
Clown attempts failed.
Expect bigger push.
FBI (4) open investigations.
8ch risk (DDOS_+_inject).
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONGER.
TOGETHER YOU CONTROL NARRATIVE & RESPONSE.
PEOPLE RESPOND TO LOGIC/FACTS.
PEOPLE SLEEPING ATTACH TO OPINION/PERSONALITY/GROUP THINK.
FEAR IS REAL.
FEAR [re: Twitter throttling & shadowban (coded #Qanon)
FEAR [re: 4ch mods + remove/replace - controlled]
FEAR [re: Reddit mods + remove/replace - controlled]
FEAR [re: MSM conspiracy push 1 - controlled]
FEAR [re: FB remove/replace - controlled]
Quiet attempts to shut down will become public & loud.
Strength TOGETHER (primary purpose).
DO NOT BE SILENT (MAJORITY).
They are losing control.
POWER W/ THE PEOPLE.
GREAT AWAKENING.
TRUTH.
GOOD V EVIL.
WWG1WGA.
TRUST YOURSELF.
Q
"The raised nail gets hammered down."
File (): 43693C27104FCF94BDE951E78F8190CB-5845994.jpg (5.6 MB, 3000x3881, Kill la Kill Satsuki Imper….jpg)
File (): C474B4F01365182666915B2D670FF42A-143231.png (139.9 KB, 454x526, Untitled.png)
Q doubles down on missile/AF1/Hawaii conspiracy.
File (): A73B88D3877F35B21E326B2C4628A5D0-16724.jpg (16.3 KB, 299x757, rs7m7yhv5sc11.jpg)
New theory.
1) The missile could not have launched from Puget Sound, WA. People would have heard it and lower level smoke would be seen.
2) The light might be traveling horizontally rather than vertically. If so the light is traveling from the distant cloud bank towards the camera, over head. It's travel is like a meteor.
3) The head of the light looks like a rocket lit on one side from the morning sun. The dark side is unlit and is lost in the over exposed cloud color.
1) The missile could not have launched from Puget Sound, WA. People would have heard it and lower level smoke would be seen.
2) The light might be traveling horizontally rather than vertically. If so the light is traveling from the distant cloud bank towards the camera, over head. It's travel is like a meteor.
3) The head of the light looks like a rocket lit on one side from the morning sun. The dark side is unlit and is lost in the over exposed cloud color.
>Possible meteor streaks across Western Washington skies
>Author: KING Staff
>Published: 11:30 AM PDT June 10, 2016
>SEATTLE – A meteor may have streaked across the Western Washington skies early Friday morning.
>Darren Clayton was driving west on the Highway 2 trestle in Everett when the dashboard camera on his car recorded video of a bright object streaking across the sky at 4:35 a.m. He posted it on YouTube
>It’s not clear yet if the object was a meteor, space junk entering the atmosphere, or something else.
https://www.king5.com/article/features/possible-meteor-streaks-across-western-washington-skies/238957000
Video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcQsYwK5XVE
Note the article says Friday but 6/10/16 on the video name is a Sunday. 4.35am is 39 minutes after the "missile" photo. The date on the car cam must be GMT/UT time. If it is UT time then
June 10, 11:35 UT = 04:35:00 a.m. Sunday June 10, 2018 in US/Pacific
>Author: KING Staff
>Published: 11:30 AM PDT June 10, 2016
>SEATTLE – A meteor may have streaked across the Western Washington skies early Friday morning.
>Darren Clayton was driving west on the Highway 2 trestle in Everett when the dashboard camera on his car recorded video of a bright object streaking across the sky at 4:35 a.m. He posted it on YouTube
>It’s not clear yet if the object was a meteor, space junk entering the atmosphere, or something else.
https://www.king5.com/article/features/possible-meteor-streaks-across-western-washington-skies/238957000
Video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcQsYwK5XVE
Note the article says Friday but 6/10/16 on the video name is a Sunday. 4.35am is 39 minutes after the "missile" photo. The date on the car cam must be GMT/UT time. If it is UT time then
June 10, 11:35 UT = 04:35:00 a.m. Sunday June 10, 2018 in US/Pacific
>>162487
I think the video is legit from 2016 (at least it would have needed some really heavyhanded retrospective edit across many websites to change it). It might be coincidence that the meteor was two years earlier, or if missile launch that they picked the date and time based on it.
https://q13fox.com/2016/06/10/meteor-fireball-what-was-that-bright-streak-in-the-sky-this-morning-over-western-washington/
I think the video is legit from 2016 (at least it would have needed some really heavyhanded retrospective edit across many websites to change it). It might be coincidence that the meteor was two years earlier, or if missile launch that they picked the date and time based on it.
https://q13fox.com/2016/06/10/meteor-fireball-what-was-that-bright-streak-in-the-sky-this-morning-over-western-washington/
>>162489
>>162490
Wow I was retarded, I did not recognize that 2016 was not 2018. Still it is interesting to ponder that this might be an actual meteor in 2016 and 2018.
>The Arietids are a strong meteor shower that lasts from May 22 to July 2 each year, and peaks on June 7.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arietids
I am going to research if the direction of travel is consistent with Arietids.
>>162490
Wow I was retarded, I did not recognize that 2016 was not 2018. Still it is interesting to ponder that this might be an actual meteor in 2016 and 2018.
>The Arietids are a strong meteor shower that lasts from May 22 to July 2 each year, and peaks on June 7.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arietids
I am going to research if the direction of travel is consistent with Arietids.
File (): E943576CAF3602EFA35AA98D4EC86019-291807.jpg (285.0 KB, 1915x973, missile-stellarium-sun-low….jpg)
File (): 4D760611154E81BC720031AA03F197AE-24663.jpg (24.1 KB, 634x490, missile-right-hand-sun.jpg)
>>162492
Arietids aren't the origin. The origin point would be above the camera so the meteor would be pointing downward unless it bounced off the atmosphere. I would also be traveling to the left not up.
Assuming the camera is pointed like camera 2 (See >>153142 pic #2 and https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2343684.html#2346322 )
Pic shows that the sun is lower right and not to the left. This means if the sun is illuminating the object and trail, the right-hand side is illuminated.
Arietids aren't the origin. The origin point would be above the camera so the meteor would be pointing downward unless it bounced off the atmosphere. I would also be traveling to the left not up.
Assuming the camera is pointed like camera 2 (See >>153142 pic #2 and https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/2343684.html#2346322 )
Pic shows that the sun is lower right and not to the left. This means if the sun is illuminating the object and trail, the right-hand side is illuminated.
File (): FE91B993A221B19AE7D4CF71316BFEF3-343079.jpg (335.0 KB, 1600x900, missile-stars-Muscida-Murf….jpg)
I think I located some stars to verify the camera angle. The object is North, if traveling horizontal is it going South.
http://www.skunkbayweather.com/WhidbeyMissile.mp4
>"It is a Canon T3 Rebel set up as a webcam. Images are captured about every 40-45 seconds. 3.5/20 second exposure/ 1600iso. I only run it on clear nights or when there could be severe weather."
>"This was actually taken with "Cam4", which is a little wider angle than Cam2 and pointing in the same direction."
>"It is a Canon T3 Rebel set up as a webcam. Images are captured about every 40-45 seconds. 3.5/20 second exposure/ 1600iso. I only run it on clear nights or when there could be severe weather."
>"This was actually taken with "Cam4", which is a little wider angle than Cam2 and pointing in the same direction."
File (): 67CB61C48A3C2BE3943E888DFFC2FAC8-193288.png (188.8 KB, 684x519, OKnIFIq.png)
File (): E56095F448E1327DEC9F2DC69E76026F-403496.jpg (394.0 KB, 802x750, 0761e03ce89f0940322326161e….jpg)
File (): 66952BDCC4396FCFE6553400CB9F1C3E-496404.jpg (484.8 KB, 3200x1640, 1yhq2wnovie11.jpg)
59 replies | 30 files | 1 UUIDs | Archived