/mlpol/ - Political Compass Test

It's that time again. Where do you stand?
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test

Political compass test threads should be deleted in my opinion desu.

>>138560
>progressisism
>treated like the opposite of "conservativism"
FUCKING REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>138559
Why? They’re kind of pointless but they’re fun.

>>138571
Because he hates fun.

I was a dirty centrist this whole time how could this have happened?

>>138582
Well, least you're on the right side.

>>138583
Surely there must be a more efficient way than going to a splinterchan political compass thread

I'll bite but I think these tests are memetests.
Almost as retarded as taking an 'IQ test,' except it's topically hot.

I somehow end up as a Right Wing Populist.
Economic: Market.
Diplomacy: Nationalist.
Statist.
Traditional.

I just don't understand why it has to act like traditionalism is the opposite of (scientific)progress.
Since when was a quiz with lots of social progressivism related things -the same??
I also swear Ancaps and loltards that I'm pro-Liberty over Authority, I just happen to think well of rule of law.
I entirely disagree with the assessment I'm a Right Wing Populist, I just happen to float the same way after consideration of root causes and their proposed practical solutions.

If that all makes me the same as 'those dumb populists, who couldn't possibly think like that causally or have well-reasoned explanations for their simple rhetoric,' then that's fine.

>>138594
I often find that the people writing these tests can't tell the difference between cultural traditions, and old [scientific] achievements. That, or they're doing it on purpose. (((I wonder why.)))

>>138582
>>138592
I usually end up somewhere between these two.
Depends on my mood but I usually lean just slightly right of central.

Eh, i don't like political compass so i didn't touch that one.
I rushed through the politiscale but it seems ok, monarchism ain't that bad as long as the king knows what he's doing.

So nice to be with fellow horsefuckers that think freely and aren't mind-numbed SJW robots.
I'll probably do the other tests when I'm bored.

>>138722
Socialist get out REEEEEEEEEEEEE.

>>138722
Become more authoritarian and you'll be okay.

>>138727
He could always go a smidge more right too.

>>138728
A centrist is the same all to me.

Thats three up and a bit to the right from last year

>>138738
The amount of neutral space in pic 1 is more unsettling than anything else. Read more faggot, then maybe you won't end up so authoritarian left.

anyway here's mine.

>>138817
>neo-liberalism
>t.PO

>>138823
>capitalism
>nationalism

>PO

>>138827
Well they are up for this, for the G*d's chosen nation, of course. :^)
everyone in Sejm is, tbh

Data for the data god, mining for the mining throne.

Spekd as Libertarian Capitalist.

Had a hearty laugh at somehow being found a neo-liberal. Really doesn't help allay the suspicions of these tests using mostly pure meme methodologies.

Some of these aren't reliable because they automatically equate defense of tradition with authoritarianism. They tend to not count whether one believes it is the domain of government or that of free associations. Spekr gets it quite right, though I resent being called a minarchist rather than an ancap.

>>138838
>Being that internationalist

>>138849
I'm ethno-nationalist, not a civic nationalist. A Hoppean/propertarian method of borders is optimal.

I don't understand these tests, I think the Issue is what I view as culture and tradition might not be the same as the creators of said tests.

>>138861
sometimes the questions can be a little hard to interpret. I particularly find ones like "do you feel authority should be questioned" or "is the use of violence to achieve change justified" to be hard to answer, because its really more about what the authority in question stands for or what change is trying to be achieved.

What a bunch of fucked up individuals you all are. Did you not learn anything from these shitty graphs last time. Plus not one of you gets a decent anarchy level. You are all a bunch of sheep with right wing economic thinking. Typical of people feading on US mindfuck politics.

Or is this thread run by a 4chan refugee who is stroking his large cock at every new graph posted. Shame on MLPOL.

>>139076
post yours or fuck off, English teacher

>>139076
These graphs show authoritarian/libertarian in an oversimplified way, it would be better if they were shown like this

>>139079
Definitely a response I would expect from a refugee.

Kinda depends on my mood, and on the test taken

Fuck Capitalism
Fuck Communism
Huey Long did nothing wrong

>>138726
He could be a National Socialist, who register authoritarian left. After all, NatSocs are, you know, National Socialists.

>>138738
This could also be a NatSoc.

>>139383
So what does this result make you, comrade?

>>139384
I'm a National Libertarian like my nation was founded on, which looks like >>138746 or >>139081. I am only saying what legit Nazis look like. NatSocs are National Socialist for a reason. They really are anti-free-market (because anti-corporatist/anti-Jews) and want “ethno-socialist” authoritarianism, so register authoritarian-left.

>>139385
It's a spectrum quite honestly. That goes from the middle of the left quadrant to the middle of the right quadrant. In many respects, the base level of economics is fairly Keynesian and corproativism/national syndicalism so to speak. They're main economic goals are usually a closed market with reigning monetary control. This is a lot like the early tyrants during Rome that stabilised private credit and issued debt jubilees.

Analysing this, there's a number of questions that can put you on the left here without being communist. Which are environmentalism, exploitation of foreign resources, whether one believes a freer market means freer people (a benign question), should museums be propped up, healthcare, etc… As long as you don't answer yes to the literal communist question that goes like "from each according to their ability, from each according to their needs," then you likely aren't communist, but probably economically "liberal" to a degree.

Meant this >>139390 for this>>139383

>>138554
>The first god damn question is loaded
>The second question is loaded
>The third question is loaded
What the flying fuck is this?

>>139794
A jew questionaire meant to divide us.

There are only two political viewpoints right now: Whites must die, or Jews must die.

>>139816
Bumping this because fuck your stats

>>138583
Most anons here are right wing, what a surprise.

first time doing this
how'd I do?

>>148011
Too moderate. Do you even 4Chan you gook?

I am the most pro-market person here. Prove me wrong.

>>148817
Hi Korwin, this is me:
>>138838

>>148821
You have lower percentage of capitalism in 8values, and you didn't show full results of Politiscales.

>>138554
>>138557
8values is great, but its labels are fucked up, and from what I've seen spekr is very biased towards anarchy and the bottom half of the compass.

Guess I am an outcast here.

>>151868
Teach me senpai!

>>151869
We make the mistake of thinking that will power changes the world's ideology. It doesn't, cumulative pragmatic need does. We think if we REEEEE hard enough the world will change, it wont. Change happens when it hurts too much not to change. When that happens some figure will be the "avatar" or icon or representative of the change. We will assume that person caused the change, by will, they didn't. We have to wait for everyone to be hurt enough to then, in themselves, want the change. You can't force people to want something. Stop REEEEing. Leave the wheel, and watch the cycles :) The pain is coming and the change will occur naturally even without REEEEing.

>>151872
so we can only choose the speed of the turning wheel?

>>151874
A German individual's choice has 1/80millionth effect on the speed of the German "wheel". Most people are not smart, they don't look to the future and then adjust course to avoid disaster. (Why worry about tomorrow? Have a beer, mate.) Most people just respond to pain, and flinch from it. The few who know, have negligible effect on the ~80million. But the pain will affected them all. So we await the pain.

The speed of the wheel is based on the length of human life, I think, and that "wave length" is girated by baby booms and bust which echo down the wavelength.

We could, by political will, have a economic incentive to smooth out baby making, which I would guess smooths out economic gyrations. I think this would be better than interest rate changes, because it gets to the primary cause, not secondary effects.

As usual for a National Socialist. I'm not doing the rest because they're all generally shit, this one is from a few months back.

>>151877
If the economy was smooth, then ideology could be smoothed out too.

>>139385
The nazis, in a historical conetext, never where against private coorperations or the individual.
Atleast not nearly as much as actual socialists. the Socialist part of the party pretty much died down after the night of the long knives (where the strasserists were killed)

>>151902
Pretty much this, though property rights were not considered sacrosanct in the context of an omnipotent State.

People like Spencer and Strasser are much more "socialist" than "nationalist."

>>151935
The Middle Way

>>151935
It means your a fence riding centrist.

>>151935
that means you have the big ghey

>>151935
[In Our Town intensifies]

>>151935
You have ascended beyond the endless cyclic battles of duality.

>>151935
You reached the ultimate balance.
Your mission now is become the neutral point of the four axis, and with your knowledge, untie politics in the ultimate perfect system

>>151868
>>151944
>>151945

indeed, this political compass only work for a mem material.

Anyway, those are from me

/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

Archived thread