/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
[Go to bottom] [Return] [Catalog] [Archive]

Archived thread

File (hide): 1556BF9D1035092E237F326ADBCC1808-1273867.png (1.2 MB, 1323x669, fucj.png)
[Bing] [wait] [Tineye] [Yandex]
fucj.png
Anonymous
????
?
No.109770
109773 109864 109898
What the fuck is up with google images
>Pic related
Anonymous
????
?
No.109773
>>109770
It's called (((Jewgle))) for a reason.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109777
109791 109792
Switch to DuckDuckGo
Anonymous
????
?
No.109791
109798 109865
>>109777
trips confirm.
Is it any good?
Anonymous
????
?
No.109792
109798 109839 109927
>>109777
>using anything but StartPage
Good luck with the botnet!
Anonymous
????
?
No.109798
>>109791
Definitely better than Google, Yahoo, or Bing.
>>109792
I'll check it out.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109839
>>109792
Can confirm, StartPage is good.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109841
109928
search white criminal or American inventor next.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109864
>>109770
The kikes are behind it Uruguayanon take the redpill.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109865
109880
>>109791
(((Duckduckgo)))
Anonymous
????
?
No.109880
109896
>>109865
Whay would you suggest, startpage?
Anonymous
????
?
No.109896
>>109880
Yea thats a good one, let me also shill tge brave browser
Anonymous
????
?
No.109897
109928
Search "European people art".
Anonymous
????
?
No.109898
109902 109928
>>109770
It's treating 'white' and 'couples' as two different keywords.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109902
109903
>>109898
Shhh, we cant actually explain to them what's happening, we gotta keep playing the Jew narrative
Anonymous
????
?
No.109903
109905 109937
>>109902
but what if this was an intended side effect of that system of searching?
Anonymous
????
?
No.109905
>>109903
Mein Gott
Anonymous
????
?
No.109915
Project Veritas already revealed that manual tweaking of these algorithms by Silicon Valley corps is a much more common ocurrence than one would think.

Also Uncle Soros has money on Alphabet.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109927
>>109792
What about Not Evil?
Anonymous
????
?
No.109928
>>109897
>>109841
It seems, these results are showing up because of ((certain sites)) that keep associating white couples with black ones, whites with criminals and etc..

>>109898
White_couples show few beans but they still show.
Meanwhile “black couples” show ..black couples.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109937
109946
File (hide): CED21E7DFDB30610CE34324DE982B899-725130.jpg (708.1 KB, 1226x925, Make up your mind, Google.jpg)
[Bing] [wait] [Tineye] [Yandex]
Make up your mind, Google.jpg
File (hide): CA2B63C1D7FDAE4CE611C7E526B1ABF6-25860.jpg (25.3 KB, 500x383, Obligatory horse.jpg)
[Bing] [wait] [Tineye] [Yandex]
Obligatory horse.jpg
>>109903
I'm convinced it is, searching keywords such as 'Caucasian' will still bring up POCs as a search result, but it is useful to remember that the search is pulling these results from websites, mostly left wing biased news articles. Whether that's a direct result of tampering with the search algorithm or merely because it's what's popular amongst the programmed masses is up in the air.

That said, I get very different results when I search this stuff. The images on pic related that are pro white race come from pro white race sources.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109946
Google gives certain kinds of sites an artificial boost, which contaminates the words "american" and "white". Searching for just "couples" looks a lot better.

>>109937
L- lewd.
Anonymous
????
?
No.109997
>still using Google
22 replies |  3 files |  1 UUIDs |  Archived
;
[Go to top] [Return] [Catalog] [Archive]