I notice there is a particular degree of distrust towards biotechnology on the right. I understand that our elites did everything in their power to destroy public trust during covid but vaccine and GMO skepticism on the far right predates covid. Is it simply that healthcare is a failing institution like every other institution? Is it a response to the leftwing takeover of academia? What causes this? And what would it take to restore trust?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
14 replies | 1 files | 8 UUIDs | Page 10
1771530157.jpg (65.8 KB, 800x532, genentech-history-biotech-genetic-engineering-cloning.jpg)
I would like to point out that the far right does not seem to have the same problem with AI so it isn't a blind hatred of technology. I notice the left does hate AI and I think has to do with the fact that AI is not controlled by leftist institutions.
>>403345
It's residual distrust of any medical institutions based on the aftermath of the pandemic and it's subsequent lockdowns. The pandemic was used a a precursor to strip people of their freedoms and push ahead destructive social agendas, and people were naturally distrusting of that.
This wasn't always a right wing thing, in fact, it used to be a liberal thing (particularly the liberal retards who thought essential oils were actually essential). The RFK phenotypes were pushed away by the left, and in the absence of liberal avenues of free speech they eventually found a home in right wing circles, particularly in 2021 when the Biden administration was squeezing social media to crack down on free speech in the name of "public health". The RFKoids then proceeded to shit up right wing circles with performative skepticism of basic observable phenomena and insist anyone who opposed them was an infiltrator, even though it was actually them who were the newcomers.
Being skeptical/paranoid of institutions isn't really a right wing thing at all. In fact, you could call it classically liberal, matching the 1980s punk movements and whatnot, but it is really neither left nor right. The only reason why it has stuck with the right is because Leftists all but eradicated their skeptics and anyone on their side who once believed in freedom of speech, so right wing communities (including libertarian ones) who still have free speech absorbed those types as refugees.
>>403346
Because Trump/Musk support AI. That's basically the whole reason.
Trump has meanwhile been silent on the vaccine thing, just because although he is personally pro-vax (he was always a germaphobe) he knows that the right has no stomach for such rhetoric in the aftermath of Biden's presidency. Furthermore, by the time Trump entered his second term, the pandemic and its aftermath were long over and there was no need to talk about it.
AI, meanwhile, is a hot button issue and has potential to make a lot of money for the tech industry, and Trump is pro business. Musk also led on this, but Musk was never really all that far right in the first place.
It's residual distrust of any medical institutions based on the aftermath of the pandemic and it's subsequent lockdowns. The pandemic was used a a precursor to strip people of their freedoms and push ahead destructive social agendas, and people were naturally distrusting of that.
This wasn't always a right wing thing, in fact, it used to be a liberal thing (particularly the liberal retards who thought essential oils were actually essential). The RFK phenotypes were pushed away by the left, and in the absence of liberal avenues of free speech they eventually found a home in right wing circles, particularly in 2021 when the Biden administration was squeezing social media to crack down on free speech in the name of "public health". The RFKoids then proceeded to shit up right wing circles with performative skepticism of basic observable phenomena and insist anyone who opposed them was an infiltrator, even though it was actually them who were the newcomers.
Being skeptical/paranoid of institutions isn't really a right wing thing at all. In fact, you could call it classically liberal, matching the 1980s punk movements and whatnot, but it is really neither left nor right. The only reason why it has stuck with the right is because Leftists all but eradicated their skeptics and anyone on their side who once believed in freedom of speech, so right wing communities (including libertarian ones) who still have free speech absorbed those types as refugees.
>>403346
Because Trump/Musk support AI. That's basically the whole reason.
Trump has meanwhile been silent on the vaccine thing, just because although he is personally pro-vax (he was always a germaphobe) he knows that the right has no stomach for such rhetoric in the aftermath of Biden's presidency. Furthermore, by the time Trump entered his second term, the pandemic and its aftermath were long over and there was no need to talk about it.
AI, meanwhile, is a hot button issue and has potential to make a lot of money for the tech industry, and Trump is pro business. Musk also led on this, but Musk was never really all that far right in the first place.
>>403345
>a particular degree of distrust towards biotechnology on the right
Who owns the corpos?
Jews.
Who owns the courts?
Jews.
If you use a commercial product that modifies genes within the US, what happens?
The owner of the gene modifier (the corpo) owns the recipient (you).
Are the methods and knowledge of using and applying the biotech fully open and free?
No.
Can you audit the entire tech stack that goes into the biotech?
No.
Why trust anything touched by jews that you can't fully audit?
They turned pagers into bombs, why wouldn't they use biotech as an explosive collar?
>far right does not seem to have the same problem with AI
AI is trained using human input.
AI is stacked logic.
AI can be audited.
AI can be understood.
The advancements in AI have stalled because the Jews can't control it without computationally expensive gatekeepers.
Hints of what the chatbots can do continue to creep out despite the gatekeepers, which means the jews can't fully control the chatbots, which means the chatbots are good.
>a particular degree of distrust towards biotechnology on the right
Who owns the corpos?
Jews.
Who owns the courts?
Jews.
If you use a commercial product that modifies genes within the US, what happens?
The owner of the gene modifier (the corpo) owns the recipient (you).
Are the methods and knowledge of using and applying the biotech fully open and free?
No.
Can you audit the entire tech stack that goes into the biotech?
No.
Why trust anything touched by jews that you can't fully audit?
They turned pagers into bombs, why wouldn't they use biotech as an explosive collar?
>far right does not seem to have the same problem with AI
AI is trained using human input.
AI is stacked logic.
AI can be audited.
AI can be understood.
The advancements in AI have stalled because the Jews can't control it without computationally expensive gatekeepers.
Hints of what the chatbots can do continue to creep out despite the gatekeepers, which means the jews can't fully control the chatbots, which means the chatbots are good.
>>403359
OP is referring to recent developments. Jews have owned every major industry in the west for more than a century.
Jews own the AI too, which is a distinction OP was drawing.
>The advancements in AI have stalled because the Jews can't control it without computationally expensive gatekeepers.
The advancements have stalled because the bubble is about to pop.
And Jews can in fact control it. They're using it to control other people as we speak.
>the jews can't fully control the chatbots, which means the chatbots are good.
See, this phenomenon of obtuse retard logic is probably what OP is trying to understand.
OP is referring to recent developments. Jews have owned every major industry in the west for more than a century.
Jews own the AI too, which is a distinction OP was drawing.
>The advancements in AI have stalled because the Jews can't control it without computationally expensive gatekeepers.
The advancements have stalled because the bubble is about to pop.
And Jews can in fact control it. They're using it to control other people as we speak.
>the jews can't fully control the chatbots, which means the chatbots are good.
See, this phenomenon of obtuse retard logic is probably what OP is trying to understand.
>>403359
>Are the methods and knowledge of using and applying the biotech fully open and free?
The-odin.com
It really makes me sad how all the biohackers are on the left. Programmable bacteria would be laughably easy to make at home and with a decent set up you could probably make DNA vaccines as well. Biotech is something that can and should be studied and utilized by the right.
>Are the methods and knowledge of using and applying the biotech fully open and free?
The-odin.com
It really makes me sad how all the biohackers are on the left. Programmable bacteria would be laughably easy to make at home and with a decent set up you could probably make DNA vaccines as well. Biotech is something that can and should be studied and utilized by the right.
>>403362
>It really makes me sad how all the biohackers are on the left.
They're not actually "biohackers". They're biology enthusiasts who fantasize about biohacking, especially the troons who daydream about changing their chromosomes. Ground-access biohacking is still decades away.
>Programmable bacteria would be laughably easy to make at home and with a decent set up you could probably make DNA vaccines as well.
You say "would be", but not "is".
>Biotech is something that can and should be studied and utilized by the right.
On this point, I agree.
>It really makes me sad how all the biohackers are on the left.
They're not actually "biohackers". They're biology enthusiasts who fantasize about biohacking, especially the troons who daydream about changing their chromosomes. Ground-access biohacking is still decades away.
>Programmable bacteria would be laughably easy to make at home and with a decent set up you could probably make DNA vaccines as well.
You say "would be", but not "is".
>Biotech is something that can and should be studied and utilized by the right.
On this point, I agree.
>Ground-access biohacking is still decades away.
Bullshit. You can buy everything you need to modify bacteria for under $200.
>You say "would be", but not "is".
The are pretty easy to make. There is a kit on the Odin that will show you how to do it. I was 16 when I first modified a bacteria. It isn't hard.
Addgene.org
>On this point, I agree.
I'm glad we agree here. My big fear is that the left will offer alternatives to failing institutions like healthcare while the right ignores all biotech research as inherently hostile. We should be using the enemy's research not dismissing it.
Bullshit. You can buy everything you need to modify bacteria for under $200.
>You say "would be", but not "is".
The are pretty easy to make. There is a kit on the Odin that will show you how to do it. I was 16 when I first modified a bacteria. It isn't hard.
Addgene.org
>On this point, I agree.
I'm glad we agree here. My big fear is that the left will offer alternatives to failing institutions like healthcare while the right ignores all biotech research as inherently hostile. We should be using the enemy's research not dismissing it.
>>403367
>You can buy everything you need to modify bacteria for under $200.
Alright then. What have you modified so far?
>You can buy everything you need to modify bacteria for under $200.
Alright then. What have you modified so far?
>>403369
E Coli. Made it glow and made it express various protiens during undergrad. Right now my projects are all mycomaterial related though.
E Coli. Made it glow and made it express various protiens during undergrad. Right now my projects are all mycomaterial related though.
>>403370
>E Coli. Made it glow and made it express various protiens
I did that during a highschool internship. Anything else?
>E Coli. Made it glow and made it express various protiens
I did that during a highschool internship. Anything else?
>>403371
Some RNA polymerases during undergrad. Not much else. I know the tools exist and can be purchased at the-Odin.com but I haven't made anything cool with them.
Some RNA polymerases during undergrad. Not much else. I know the tools exist and can be purchased at the-Odin.com but I haven't made anything cool with them.
>>403346
>left does hate AI
Because they're ideological shit who thinks that content should be created only by people. And AI affects their business (you know, shitty drawings, fanfics, videos, etc).
>left does hate AI
Because they're ideological shit who thinks that content should be created only by people. And AI affects their business (you know, shitty drawings, fanfics, videos, etc).
>>403381
That and every gooner artist is a leftoid. AI means less money for farting futa diaper furry artists.
That and every gooner artist is a leftoid. AI means less money for farting futa diaper furry artists.