In my reading of The Bible I have come across something. We know jews aren't Israelites, but I believe they aren't descended from Esau either. Instead, I believe they are the tribe of Elam, sons of Shem.
In Jeremiah 49:34-39 the LORD destroys Elam for Baal worship & sacrificing children to Moloch, condemning them to be scattered across the Earth and live in each nation without a homeland until "the latter days" when they will be gathered together in captivity, like when the false jews are judged in Revelation. In pic related it says that Elam were a matriarchal society that proved lineage through one's Mother and gravitated towards works in the arts. Sound familiar?
This really cinched it for me: The Curse of Ham. There is a lot of confusion and misinformation about this (often as a result of jewry) but to recap Ham angered Noah by looking upon his nakedness instead of covering him in a garment as his brothers did and Noah declared the following: "...Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren."
Now, I've often interpreted this to be the origin of our White savior complex wherein White people will seemingly fight to the death for people that clearly hate them and are barbarous. That is us being a servant of our brethren.
The jews do not have this instinct. In fact, they are the polar opposite which proves they can't be descended from Esau as he and Jacob were the sons of Isaac, who was the son of Abraham, who was descended from Ham. However, if they are truly descended from Shem they wouldn't have the curse of Ham explaining this behavior.
What does this mean?
It means that not only are they not the jews of the Bible, but that they have no reason to claim expertise or association with Christianity or the Middle East and there is no reason for them to be shown the good will that they have demanded from the world over.
This is the smoking gun that will be the undoing of them.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
26 replies | 16 files | 19 UUIDs | Page 8
1770930572.jpg (141.9 KB, 1080x730, Screenshot_20260211-172255~2.png)
>This is the smoking gun that will be the undoing of them.
I think the fact that they ritualistically mass rape, torture, sell, and eat little White kids is more likely to be their undoing. That, or their genocidal arson, racially-targeted usury, human bioweapon trafficking, drug selling, food cartelling, animal abuse, and inbreeding will be their undoing. Stop muddying the discussion of reasonable hatred with your fake DaVinci Code ironic schizobabble bullshit. There are 6 million reasons to hate Jews and none of the significant ones can be deduced from cryptic messages and inconsistencies between bible versions.
I think the fact that they ritualistically mass rape, torture, sell, and eat little White kids is more likely to be their undoing. That, or their genocidal arson, racially-targeted usury, human bioweapon trafficking, drug selling, food cartelling, animal abuse, and inbreeding will be their undoing. Stop muddying the discussion of reasonable hatred with your fake DaVinci Code ironic schizobabble bullshit. There are 6 million reasons to hate Jews and none of the significant ones can be deduced from cryptic messages and inconsistencies between bible versions.
>>403158
Fuck's sakes. Did you ever read that book without taking off the indoctrination blinders? No, of course not, otherwise the answer would've slapped you in the face by now. Simple fucking answer: kikes = outcast Canaanites. The ONLY Canaanite tribe committing rape, murdering, sacrificing humans, and eating humans, are those degenerate fringe dwellers. Neither were or are Semitic in the slightest.
This is a yearly reminder: EVERY ACCUSATION MADE BY A JEW IS A CONFESSION.
Fuck's sakes. Did you ever read that book without taking off the indoctrination blinders? No, of course not, otherwise the answer would've slapped you in the face by now. Simple fucking answer: kikes = outcast Canaanites. The ONLY Canaanite tribe committing rape, murdering, sacrificing humans, and eating humans, are those degenerate fringe dwellers. Neither were or are Semitic in the slightest.
This is a yearly reminder: EVERY ACCUSATION MADE BY A JEW IS A CONFESSION.
>>403158
there are information that Jews lived in nearby areas of iran/old persia such as Elam or even Babylon where they were enslaved.
although I am a religious person, it should always be kept in mind that religious texts cannot be considered as part of history. a lot could have been added to the book later on , or if you want to go for realism approach...those writings could be a complete exaggerated mythology. also don't forget that many parts of Bible comes from torah, a book that is written by jews.
if you look at any religions deep enough, you will realize that people of that religion love to recognize themselves as purely created and beloved by their God.
btw i must say that many Jews do not believe in their own religion and mostly use it for profiteering and lying. so trying to engage against them using their materials is kinda useless.
maybe i guess you want to use it against some christians whom been played by jews but still it would not be useful cause sadly many of them are far brainwashed.
>>403159
like my dude said here,there are alot of better reasons to despise them.
--
i mostly writing this because i take offence to have any association with them and i don't want the conversation to go toward "oh funny. jews are actually confused iranites". even iftrue, fuck them, hope they burn in fire, we don't accept them.
there are information that Jews lived in nearby areas of iran/old persia such as Elam or even Babylon where they were enslaved.
although I am a religious person, it should always be kept in mind that religious texts cannot be considered as part of history. a lot could have been added to the book later on , or if you want to go for realism approach...those writings could be a complete exaggerated mythology. also don't forget that many parts of Bible comes from torah, a book that is written by jews.
if you look at any religions deep enough, you will realize that people of that religion love to recognize themselves as purely created and beloved by their God.
btw i must say that many Jews do not believe in their own religion and mostly use it for profiteering and lying. so trying to engage against them using their materials is kinda useless.
maybe i guess you want to use it against some christians whom been played by jews but still it would not be useful cause sadly many of them are far brainwashed.
>>403159
like my dude said here,there are alot of better reasons to despise them.
--
i mostly writing this because i take offence to have any association with them and i don't want the conversation to go toward "oh funny. jews are actually confused iranites". even if
>>403161
it doesn't matter where they come from ,it's important what they do. their past doesn't excuse their present behaviour.
it doesn't matter where they come from ,it's important what they do. their past doesn't excuse their present behaviour.
The jewish culture and spirit seems to just lead to making everyone hate them one way or another. Sucks to be them, lol.
1770949861_1.jpg (57.0 KB, 700x622, 5C1B7F4D34CD641C33590A2F96D06501-58335.jpg)
1770949861_2.jpg (67.2 KB, 525x679, 200632ABA393F221BBE651BF34D2B5C9-68784.jpg)
>>403161
>nearby areas
>assocations
Oh fuck no, not even CLOSE. The Persian Empire was vast, but the majority of integrated cultures didn't suffer from kike depredations.
Simple explanations time, though you most likely know the historical totality far better than me.
#1: those subhumans which call themselves jews originated from Canaan. Supposedly, 3,000 years ago, a figure known as (((heshem))), the super-ultra-mega jew rabbi-of-all-rabbis, claimed that "all will belong to the [takers] (AKA: the jews that would eventually come into existence)".
#2: the term 'rabbi' is a bizarre term. It refers to the highest pre-jew caste, that being priests, but also refers to 'enforcing the heshem's rule on [us]", that being jews.
#3: problems arise there. The word 'heshem' does not actively nor historically refer to a specific individual. Instead, 'heshem' is a tone deaf, hyper-specialized bastardization of a MUCH later phrase stolen from the Late Babylonian language. In short, the kikes rebranded 'heshem' in their pigfucking yid-speak to mean: "our [king] above all other [kings]". In short, propagandizing a super-individual that never existed.
#4: the other Canaanite tribes and clans were disgusted at their so-called brethren committing crimes of heresy. They had been at peace (mostly) with the Persian Empire during its reign, acknowledged the rising Egyptian Empire, yet kept themselves apart. In short, Canaan had barely ANY contact or trade with non-Canaanites.
#5: at a specific point in time, the Canaanites threw the pigfucking proto-hewboo's out of Canaan's inner borders. Said known borders were created during the Persian Empire's collapse. Said event occurred during the Late Babylonian Empire right before it began crumbling, and during the Late Egyptian Empire's middle expansion era.
#6: 40~ish some years of the so-called 'exodus' later, a small number of those proto-jews left the collapsing Babylonian Empire after having been educated and learning of the El and the Elohim. They went on to learn from the Egyptians, which is where shit gets downright retarded.
#7: the El were the higher deities of Babylonia, some of which were syncretized into smaller, more manageable groupings. El referred to the sole or dual patrons of specific arts, sciences, activities, and the like.
#8: Elohim was the entire Babylonian pantheon. Which, according to what we know from translations, was WILD. Think of the Greek pantheon, but more bizarre and sociable.
#9: what happens when a bunch of inbred pigfuckers take a bunch of mythology and mythological connections, partially unwritten of course, from two entirely different empires, then rewrite all they knew to 'show' they were the truest, biggest, bestest, and mostest favored in all the (then barely known) lands? You get a kike.
#10: the early start of the Late Egyptian Empire was where much more had been stolen from, partially from a bunch of problems caused by inbreeding during the Middle Dynasty, such the Ramses lineage being incredibly hideous. The new problem arose. It is of PARTICULAR note that those proto-jews suffered numerous and hilarious military losses while trying to 'claim the whole of Canaan for themselves', and began to inbreed since no one wanted them. HEAVILY.
#10a: genetic testing on 'modern' jews in the 1990's revealed there had been approximately 14,000 of the outcast Canaanites remaining when the 'exodus' didn't akshully occur. Excluding the old, infirm, crippled, too young, and ineligible females, that meant a population of 5,000 or less. "Keeping (the blood) within the family" became law, also known as 'torah' then.
#11: since those outcasts were no longer Canaanites, the "exodus" story, which was a NEAR-complete rewrite based the Epic of Gilgamesh and similar Babylonian stories, with some Egyptian flavors tossed in, immediately spread. Gaining traction and favor, the beginnings of what would become the torah, and eventually the consolidated torah, were formed. During that time the term 'rabbi' became idealized as a person incapable of doubleplusungood nontruths and would never ever-never ever-never tell a wrongungood word.
#12: during the Early Greek Kingdom era, FAR more mythology was stolen, rebranded, and syncretized. The Underworld ruled by Hades and Persephone became bastardized into 'sheol', while the Norse Hel was flipped upside down from a land of frigid, skin-peeling cold into a place of ever-burning fiery torment.
#13: fuck you I'm tired of thinking.
tl;dr: the freakish subhuman monsters known as jews are far more inbred than brits, and barely worse than Mao's banker family. The best and only proposal to deal with them is a Final Solution.
>nearby areas
>assocations
Oh fuck no, not even CLOSE. The Persian Empire was vast, but the majority of integrated cultures didn't suffer from kike depredations.
Simple explanations time, though you most likely know the historical totality far better than me.
#1: those subhumans which call themselves jews originated from Canaan. Supposedly, 3,000 years ago, a figure known as (((heshem))), the super-ultra-mega jew rabbi-of-all-rabbis, claimed that "all will belong to the [takers] (AKA: the jews that would eventually come into existence)".
#2: the term 'rabbi' is a bizarre term. It refers to the highest pre-jew caste, that being priests, but also refers to 'enforcing the heshem's rule on [us]", that being jews.
#3: problems arise there. The word 'heshem' does not actively nor historically refer to a specific individual. Instead, 'heshem' is a tone deaf, hyper-specialized bastardization of a MUCH later phrase stolen from the Late Babylonian language. In short, the kikes rebranded 'heshem' in their pigfucking yid-speak to mean: "our [king] above all other [kings]". In short, propagandizing a super-individual that never existed.
#4: the other Canaanite tribes and clans were disgusted at their so-called brethren committing crimes of heresy. They had been at peace (mostly) with the Persian Empire during its reign, acknowledged the rising Egyptian Empire, yet kept themselves apart. In short, Canaan had barely ANY contact or trade with non-Canaanites.
#5: at a specific point in time, the Canaanites threw the pigfucking proto-hewboo's out of Canaan's inner borders. Said known borders were created during the Persian Empire's collapse. Said event occurred during the Late Babylonian Empire right before it began crumbling, and during the Late Egyptian Empire's middle expansion era.
#6: 40~ish some years of the so-called 'exodus' later, a small number of those proto-jews left the collapsing Babylonian Empire after having been educated and learning of the El and the Elohim. They went on to learn from the Egyptians, which is where shit gets downright retarded.
#7: the El were the higher deities of Babylonia, some of which were syncretized into smaller, more manageable groupings. El referred to the sole or dual patrons of specific arts, sciences, activities, and the like.
#8: Elohim was the entire Babylonian pantheon. Which, according to what we know from translations, was WILD. Think of the Greek pantheon, but more bizarre and sociable.
#9: what happens when a bunch of inbred pigfuckers take a bunch of mythology and mythological connections, partially unwritten of course, from two entirely different empires, then rewrite all they knew to 'show' they were the truest, biggest, bestest, and mostest favored in all the (then barely known) lands? You get a kike.
#10: the early start of the Late Egyptian Empire was where much more had been stolen from, partially from a bunch of problems caused by inbreeding during the Middle Dynasty, such the Ramses lineage being incredibly hideous. The new problem arose. It is of PARTICULAR note that those proto-jews suffered numerous and hilarious military losses while trying to 'claim the whole of Canaan for themselves', and began to inbreed since no one wanted them. HEAVILY.
#10a: genetic testing on 'modern' jews in the 1990's revealed there had been approximately 14,000 of the outcast Canaanites remaining when the 'exodus' didn't akshully occur. Excluding the old, infirm, crippled, too young, and ineligible females, that meant a population of 5,000 or less. "Keeping (the blood) within the family" became law, also known as 'torah' then.
#11: since those outcasts were no longer Canaanites, the "exodus" story, which was a NEAR-complete rewrite based the Epic of Gilgamesh and similar Babylonian stories, with some Egyptian flavors tossed in, immediately spread. Gaining traction and favor, the beginnings of what would become the torah, and eventually the consolidated torah, were formed. During that time the term 'rabbi' became idealized as a person incapable of doubleplusungood nontruths and would never ever-never ever-never tell a wrongungood word.
#12: during the Early Greek Kingdom era, FAR more mythology was stolen, rebranded, and syncretized. The Underworld ruled by Hades and Persephone became bastardized into 'sheol', while the Norse Hel was flipped upside down from a land of frigid, skin-peeling cold into a place of ever-burning fiery torment.
#13: fuck you I'm tired of thinking.
tl;dr: the freakish subhuman monsters known as jews are far more inbred than brits, and barely worse than Mao's banker family. The best and only proposal to deal with them is a Final Solution.
>>403165
>invented figure of (((Heshem)))
don't know much about it.
weird thing is, the arabs also have "Hashem", who mohammed is from their family, and basically they say that their tree related to Ishmael, the son of abraham. also hashemites are royal families that ruled over jordan,iraq, mecca and etc and still to this day they are powerful. not sure if it's related or not.
>"rabbi" as a forced authority rather than a scholarly title.
rabbi means guide, in arabic it is "rab" which also means the same; i think it is the same shit with mullahs and medieval age priests. instead of being only religious missionaries, through times they gained more power and authority by cunningly manipulating religious laws.
>Jewish theology (e.g., Elohim, Sheol) being plagiarized from Babylonian, Egyptian, and Greek beliefs.
elohim and allah (both taken from the word ''el'' meaning god) were both idols / totem in historical context which in due to time those evolved into become a deity. even the names of angels are coming from astrological beliefs (names of planet and starts). i don't necessarily think those are stolen, maybe somewhat influenced by them (like gabriel and hermes sharing the same rule). at the very end all of it is connected to mithraism root, that is why there is similarity.
>The story of the Exodus as a fabricated myth based on other ancient epics.
probably. maybe they just ran away from egypt and create a whole over exaggerated bullshit epic history out of it
like troy; it is a true historical war that actually happened but there was no hero or gods involved they just added that to make it more spicy.
one thing that can be said for sure is that the Jews were always on the run, always causing trouble, hated by the rulers, and always carrying this narcissism and self-superiority with them, even though God always punished them heavily for it (even in their own religious context)
the thing jews are always confused about is that being "chosen" (like as a lab rat for science experience) doesn't mean as being superior to others it actually means being picked up or given a chance.
>jews are far more inbred than brits
oh come on now
>The best and only proposal to deal with them is a Final Solution.
jews are like cancer, you research about them not for science or understatement but just to find a cure for it.
--
also sorry if none of what i said was related or informative, i don't really have much knowledge about jews or their history, and in all honestly no one should give a fuck about their history. they never should have been this important for any sort.
>invented figure of (((Heshem)))
don't know much about it.
weird thing is, the arabs also have "Hashem", who mohammed is from their family, and basically they say that their tree related to Ishmael, the son of abraham. also hashemites are royal families that ruled over jordan,iraq, mecca and etc and still to this day they are powerful. not sure if it's related or not.
>"rabbi" as a forced authority rather than a scholarly title.
rabbi means guide, in arabic it is "rab" which also means the same; i think it is the same shit with mullahs and medieval age priests. instead of being only religious missionaries, through times they gained more power and authority by cunningly manipulating religious laws.
>Jewish theology (e.g., Elohim, Sheol) being plagiarized from Babylonian, Egyptian, and Greek beliefs.
elohim and allah (both taken from the word ''el'' meaning god) were both idols / totem in historical context which in due to time those evolved into become a deity. even the names of angels are coming from astrological beliefs (names of planet and starts). i don't necessarily think those are stolen, maybe somewhat influenced by them (like gabriel and hermes sharing the same rule). at the very end all of it is connected to mithraism root, that is why there is similarity.
>The story of the Exodus as a fabricated myth based on other ancient epics.
probably. maybe they just ran away from egypt and create a whole over exaggerated bullshit epic history out of it
like troy; it is a true historical war that actually happened but there was no hero or gods involved they just added that to make it more spicy.
one thing that can be said for sure is that the Jews were always on the run, always causing trouble, hated by the rulers, and always carrying this narcissism and self-superiority with them, even though God always punished them heavily for it (even in their own religious context)
the thing jews are always confused about is that being "chosen" (like as a lab rat for science experience) doesn't mean as being superior to others it actually means being picked up or given a chance.
>jews are far more inbred than brits
oh come on now
>The best and only proposal to deal with them is a Final Solution.
jews are like cancer, you research about them not for science or understatement but just to find a cure for it.
--
also sorry if none of what i said was related or informative, i don't really have much knowledge about jews or their history, and in all honestly no one should give a fuck about their history. they never should have been this important for any sort.
>>403168
It's not the first time I've heard the term "white savior complex".
Liberal whites, especially liberal white women, get a narcissistic kick out of believing that they are saving brown people.
It's not the first time I've heard the term "white savior complex".
Liberal whites, especially liberal white women, get a narcissistic kick out of believing that they are saving brown people.
>>403158
>Instead, I believe they are the tribe of Elam, sons of Shem.
This major theory is just more BS from the kikes! Archaeological evidence completely rejects the idea that Elamites (who were a pre-aryan zagros tribe) were semitic. Genetically and culturally, they were different from other semites; they didn't even sacrifice children to dumb gods like Baal and Moloch like some of those tribes did. Basically, they had their own gods. I haven't seen anywhere in the Bible saying they were destroyed for worshipping Baal and Moloch. Actually, they didn't even disappear the way the bible claim. Elamites were still around during the Achaemenid era, and their language was one of the official ones.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19310
>...The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers...
The Jews have a complex about being civilized and try to latch onto every civilization and stick their fake semitic identity onto it, which is why this garbage was written.
It's good that you are pointing out the jews' contradictions using their own texts, but you shouldn't accept their claims as a believable hypothesis. If we do that, then based on Avestan texts, I can say that Iranians, Turanians, Greeks (and Romans) are all children of Fereydun and cousins. Just because that text exists, does that mean we have to believe it?
>...Elam were a matriarchal society that proved lineage through one's Mother and gravitated towards works in the arts...
Ummmm, source?
>...The Curse of Ham...
>...the origin of our White savior complex...
>...That is us being a servant of our brethren...
>...Abraham, who was descended from Ham...
>...This is the smoking gun that will be the undoing of them.
WTF??!
Ham became the father of white people??! White people are condemned to serve??! Abraham was the son of HAM??!!...
Man, either I don't get your mental gymnastics, or you're really churning out this nonsense?? Your smoking gun has just blown smoke into your own eyes and ours.
>>403159
He was going about criticizing jews the right way; being able to criticize them using their own hypotheses is really good. But from one point to another, he started talking schizophrenically.
>>403160
I agree. I think almost the entire book of exodus could be pure lies; even genetic data confirms that, contrary to their claims, jews have close genetic ties to Canaanites.
He is probably from one of those christians trying to justify believing this nonsense while still being anti-kike by proving that these (((jews))) aren't "those" (((jews))).
>>403161
>there are information that Jews lived in nearby areas of iran/old persia such as Elam or even Babylon where they were enslaved.
Kikes are like weeds. Wherever there is a civilization, they show up and stick their heads out just to get shat on.
>although I am a religious person, it should always be kept in mind that religious texts cannot be considered as part of history. a lot could have been added to the book later on , or if you want to go for realism approach...those writings could be a complete exaggerated mythology.
Someone with that kind of mindset is basically no different from a potterhead or even a brony like us. Even though we are interested and believe in it, we ultimately know these things don't exist in this world, yet we still have to view religious ceremonies as a kind of con in the end. It's weird to me how you're still religious with this way of thinking...
>...also don't forget that many parts of Bible comes from torah, a book that is written by jews.
And the bible itself.
>...engage against them using their materials is kinda useless...
>...still it would not be useful cause sadly many of them are far brainwashed.
As I said before, debunking a discourse using its own definitions is the best kind of blow to it. I believe these talks will yield results in the long run.
>i mostly writing this because i take offence to have any association with them and i don't want the conversation to go toward "oh funny. jews are actually confused iranites". even if true, fuck them, hope they burn in fire, we don't accept them.
Kikes always consider themselves the champions of civilization by latching onto other civilizations. Don't worry, these morons aren't like any human being at all; that's why if they feel it benefits them, they are even willing to claim that the roots of chinese civilization were semitic too.
>>403162
>it doesn't matter where they come from ,it's important what they do. their past doesn't excuse their present behaviour.
But their dark and dirty past can explain their present.
>>403163
They have been hated in every civilization and nation. Have they ever considered, instead of blaming others, that maybe they're the faggots here?
>>403165
>heshem stuff...
What/Who the fuck is he/it? What's your source?
>the Epic of Gilgamesh
Isn't that related to Noah's flood? I haven't heard it about exodus.
>...while the Norse Hel was flipped upside down from a land of frigid, skin-peeling cold into a place of ever-burning fiery torment...
Many of the mystical concepts and ideas about the afterlife were created by the jews after learning about Zoroastrian concepts during the Achaemenid period.
>tl;dr
Useful and simple. Perfect.
>>403166
>...weird thing is, the arabs also have "Hashem...
This hashem is so much different with that heshem.
هر گردی، گردو نیست
>...in arabic it is "rab" which also means the same...
It means Lord in arabic and really means god. The meanings are distinct; precisely because of this ambiguity, jews in muslim countries would use the word Hakham(Khakham) instead of Rabbi to avoid any misunderstanding.
>jews are like cancer, you research about them not for science or understatement but just to find a cure for it.
Well said
'You are the "chosen" people for being a challenge'
>Instead, I believe they are the tribe of Elam, sons of Shem.
This major theory is just more BS from the kikes! Archaeological evidence completely rejects the idea that Elamites (who were a pre-aryan zagros tribe) were semitic. Genetically and culturally, they were different from other semites; they didn't even sacrifice children to dumb gods like Baal and Moloch like some of those tribes did. Basically, they had their own gods. I haven't seen anywhere in the Bible saying they were destroyed for worshipping Baal and Moloch. Actually, they didn't even disappear the way the bible claim. Elamites were still around during the Achaemenid era, and their language was one of the official ones.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature19310
>...The first farmers of the southern Levant (Israel and Jordan) and Zagros Mountains (Iran) were strongly genetically differentiated, and each descended from local hunter–gatherers...
The Jews have a complex about being civilized and try to latch onto every civilization and stick their fake semitic identity onto it, which is why this garbage was written.
It's good that you are pointing out the jews' contradictions using their own texts, but you shouldn't accept their claims as a believable hypothesis. If we do that, then based on Avestan texts, I can say that Iranians, Turanians, Greeks (and Romans) are all children of Fereydun and cousins. Just because that text exists, does that mean we have to believe it?
>...Elam were a matriarchal society that proved lineage through one's Mother and gravitated towards works in the arts...
Ummmm, source?
>...The Curse of Ham...
>...the origin of our White savior complex...
>...That is us being a servant of our brethren...
>...Abraham, who was descended from Ham...
>...This is the smoking gun that will be the undoing of them.
WTF??!
Ham became the father of white people??! White people are condemned to serve??! Abraham was the son of HAM??!!...
Man, either I don't get your mental gymnastics, or you're really churning out this nonsense?? Your smoking gun has just blown smoke into your own eyes and ours.
>>403159
He was going about criticizing jews the right way; being able to criticize them using their own hypotheses is really good. But from one point to another, he started talking schizophrenically.
>>403160
I agree. I think almost the entire book of exodus could be pure lies; even genetic data confirms that, contrary to their claims, jews have close genetic ties to Canaanites.
He is probably from one of those christians trying to justify believing this nonsense while still being anti-kike by proving that these (((jews))) aren't "those" (((jews))).
>>403161
>there are information that Jews lived in nearby areas of iran/old persia such as Elam or even Babylon where they were enslaved.
Kikes are like weeds. Wherever there is a civilization, they show up and stick their heads out just to get shat on.
>although I am a religious person, it should always be kept in mind that religious texts cannot be considered as part of history. a lot could have been added to the book later on , or if you want to go for realism approach...those writings could be a complete exaggerated mythology.
Someone with that kind of mindset is basically no different from a potterhead or even a brony like us. Even though we are interested and believe in it, we ultimately know these things don't exist in this world, yet we still have to view religious ceremonies as a kind of con in the end. It's weird to me how you're still religious with this way of thinking...
>...also don't forget that many parts of Bible comes from torah, a book that is written by jews.
And the bible itself.
>...engage against them using their materials is kinda useless...
>...still it would not be useful cause sadly many of them are far brainwashed.
As I said before, debunking a discourse using its own definitions is the best kind of blow to it. I believe these talks will yield results in the long run.
>i mostly writing this because i take offence to have any association with them and i don't want the conversation to go toward "oh funny. jews are actually confused iranites". even if true, fuck them, hope they burn in fire, we don't accept them.
Kikes always consider themselves the champions of civilization by latching onto other civilizations. Don't worry, these morons aren't like any human being at all; that's why if they feel it benefits them, they are even willing to claim that the roots of chinese civilization were semitic too.
>>403162
>it doesn't matter where they come from ,it's important what they do. their past doesn't excuse their present behaviour.
But their dark and dirty past can explain their present.
>>403163
They have been hated in every civilization and nation. Have they ever considered, instead of blaming others, that maybe they're the faggots here?
>>403165
>heshem stuff...
What/Who the fuck is he/it? What's your source?
>the Epic of Gilgamesh
Isn't that related to Noah's flood? I haven't heard it about exodus.
>...while the Norse Hel was flipped upside down from a land of frigid, skin-peeling cold into a place of ever-burning fiery torment...
Many of the mystical concepts and ideas about the afterlife were created by the jews after learning about Zoroastrian concepts during the Achaemenid period.
>tl;dr
Useful and simple. Perfect.
>>403166
>...weird thing is, the arabs also have "Hashem...
This hashem is so much different with that heshem.
هر گردی، گردو نیست
>...in arabic it is "rab" which also means the same...
It means Lord in arabic and really means god. The meanings are distinct; precisely because of this ambiguity, jews in muslim countries would use the word Hakham(Khakham) instead of Rabbi to avoid any misunderstanding.
>jews are like cancer, you research about them not for science or understatement but just to find a cure for it.
Well said
'You are the "chosen" people for being a challenge'
>>403160
Elam was a tribe in Canaan
>>403182
I just told you, in Jeremiah 49:34-39. The entire books of Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel as well as parts of Isaiah, 2 Kings, and 2 Chronicles are about God saying the Israelites will be captured by Babylon for Baal worship and oassing theor children through the fires unto Moloch. This is most explicitly called out in Ezekiel where ots said they've savrificed their children and made them a pot of flesh.
Honestly, based on the reading one would assume that Elam was another Israelite settlement, though there seems to be a rather large narrative claiming they are descended from Shem.
Elam was a tribe in Canaan
>>403182
I just told you, in Jeremiah 49:34-39. The entire books of Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel as well as parts of Isaiah, 2 Kings, and 2 Chronicles are about God saying the Israelites will be captured by Babylon for Baal worship and oassing theor children through the fires unto Moloch. This is most explicitly called out in Ezekiel where ots said they've savrificed their children and made them a pot of flesh.
Honestly, based on the reading one would assume that Elam was another Israelite settlement, though there seems to be a rather large narrative claiming they are descended from Shem.
>>403160
That's just wrong. Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel clearly state everyone has been tempted to whore with false gods and do those things. That's why they were delivered into Babylon.
That's just wrong. Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel clearly state everyone has been tempted to whore with false gods and do those things. That's why they were delivered into Babylon.
1771381313_1.png (1.6 MB, 1008x760, aristotle - democracy is only possible within homogeneous ethnic groups.png)
1771381313_2.webm (6.1 MB, Resolution:640x480 Length:00:02:31, Who Wants War.webm) [play once] [loop]
>>403158
>In my reading of The Bible I have come across something. We know jews aren't Israelites, but I believe they aren't descended from Esau either. Instead, I believe they are the tribe of Elam, sons of Shem.
It don't matta.
"Jew" has come to describe a subspecies of man that has a specific behavioral pattern.
They subsist on slavery. Their weapons are usury (slavery), fractional reserve banking (slavery), scalping (aggressive middlemen), hypocrisy, legalism, and deception.
They destroy so that they may enslave.
They've been expelled from every territory save one: India.
Aristotle believed them to originate from India.
>In my reading of The Bible I have come across something. We know jews aren't Israelites, but I believe they aren't descended from Esau either. Instead, I believe they are the tribe of Elam, sons of Shem.
It don't matta.
"Jew" has come to describe a subspecies of man that has a specific behavioral pattern.
They subsist on slavery. Their weapons are usury (slavery), fractional reserve banking (slavery), scalping (aggressive middlemen), hypocrisy, legalism, and deception.
They destroy so that they may enslave.
They've been expelled from every territory save one: India.
Aristotle believed them to originate from India.
>>403271
>Elam was a tribe in Canaan
They were literally a pre-aryan Iranian people from the zagros mountains. I even provided a credible article from Nature that clearly stated they weren't even close to being semitic. That ziggurat is Chogha Zanbil in Khuzestan province, Iran, and it dates back to the Elamite era. The Achaemenids' winter capital, and a major region for both the Parthians and Sassanians, was Susa and Elam. Even right now in my country, there is a province called Ilam and a city called Susa. If you are this retarded, at least look at a map. How could they possibly be Canaanite?
>I just told you, in Jeremiah 49:34-39. The entire books of Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel as well as parts of Isaiah, 2 Kings,...
So what?? None of these have anything to do with the Elamites...
>Honestly, based on the reading one would assume that Elam was another Israelite settlement...
DC comics are also written in a way that makes Batman seem real, so does that make him real?? Do you believe every single piece of shit people say in the bible?? Why are you trying to make this debunked bullshit look believable?
>>403272
>That's just wrong. Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel...
I'll say it again: none of this has anything to do with the Elamites. Why are you trying to connect two clear and distinct truths? The incompetent kikes, to justify their failure, claimed worshipped Baal and Moloch, and on the other hand, they falsely claimed that Elamites were semitic. Two different, clear, and separate bullshit.
>>403276
I even believe they were probably kicked out of india too. Until just a few hundred years ago, indians were enough smart to be not supporters of kikes. I also couldn't find anywhere where Aristotle spoke about jews being indian. Jews were a tribe hated by the rest of the Canaanites, and because of their savagery, they were expelled from everywhere.
>Elam was a tribe in Canaan
They were literally a pre-aryan Iranian people from the zagros mountains. I even provided a credible article from Nature that clearly stated they weren't even close to being semitic. That ziggurat is Chogha Zanbil in Khuzestan province, Iran, and it dates back to the Elamite era. The Achaemenids' winter capital, and a major region for both the Parthians and Sassanians, was Susa and Elam. Even right now in my country, there is a province called Ilam and a city called Susa. If you are this retarded, at least look at a map. How could they possibly be Canaanite?
>I just told you, in Jeremiah 49:34-39. The entire books of Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel as well as parts of Isaiah, 2 Kings,...
So what?? None of these have anything to do with the Elamites...
>Honestly, based on the reading one would assume that Elam was another Israelite settlement...
DC comics are also written in a way that makes Batman seem real, so does that make him real?? Do you believe every single piece of shit people say in the bible?? Why are you trying to make this debunked bullshit look believable?
>>403272
>That's just wrong. Jeremiah, Lamentations, and Ezekiel...
I'll say it again: none of this has anything to do with the Elamites. Why are you trying to connect two clear and distinct truths? The incompetent kikes, to justify their failure, claimed worshipped Baal and Moloch, and on the other hand, they falsely claimed that Elamites were semitic. Two different, clear, and separate bullshit.
>>403276
I even believe they were probably kicked out of india too. Until just a few hundred years ago, indians were enough smart to be not supporters of kikes. I also couldn't find anywhere where Aristotle spoke about jews being indian. Jews were a tribe hated by the rest of the Canaanites, and because of their savagery, they were expelled from everywhere.
>>403312
>they were probably kicked out of india too
No. Go look at the Sassoon family. The only reason the sassoons were hated was because they were attached to the brits.
The jews have never been expelled by indians from india.
The upper echelons of brahman saw the degradation of india as a whole and migrated out.
The gypsies followed the same routes out of india.
Indians still love the jews, and always work closely with them. Look at the relation between indians and jews in immigration, c-suite boards, and wage workers.
> I also couldn't find anywhere where Aristotle spoke about jews being indian.
You didn't even do a basic search then.
"aristotle jews india"
https://swarajyamag.com/culture/was-aristotles-claim-of-indian-origin-of-jews-true
https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/1774-aristotle-in-jewish-legend
The similarities are far deeper through moloch, human sacrifice, and their general beliefs surrounding making use of abilities "Jugaad", and caste systems.
**Jews at the top, indians as their functionaries, loyalists as their craftsmen, imports as their servants and farmers, and free white men as their dalits**
Use the internet. The truth is easy to find.
"aristotle jews india"
"jewish expulsions from india"
The beauty is that whether or not you choose to believe any of this doesn't change that it's all true.
>they were probably kicked out of india too
No. Go look at the Sassoon family. The only reason the sassoons were hated was because they were attached to the brits.
The jews have never been expelled by indians from india.
The upper echelons of brahman saw the degradation of india as a whole and migrated out.
The gypsies followed the same routes out of india.
Indians still love the jews, and always work closely with them. Look at the relation between indians and jews in immigration, c-suite boards, and wage workers.
> I also couldn't find anywhere where Aristotle spoke about jews being indian.
You didn't even do a basic search then.
"aristotle jews india"
https://swarajyamag.com/culture/was-aristotles-claim-of-indian-origin-of-jews-true
https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/1774-aristotle-in-jewish-legend
The similarities are far deeper through moloch, human sacrifice, and their general beliefs surrounding making use of abilities "Jugaad", and caste systems.
**Jews at the top, indians as their functionaries, loyalists as their craftsmen, imports as their servants and farmers, and free white men as their dalits**
Use the internet. The truth is easy to find.
"aristotle jews india"
"jewish expulsions from india"
The beauty is that whether or not you choose to believe any of this doesn't change that it's all true.
I don't think their constant inbreeding with each other helps them much. (At least they keep that retardation away from the rest of the gene pool)
>>403182
>we ultimately know these things don't exist in this world, yet we still have to view religious ceremonies as a kind of con in the end
Religion is just kind of entertainment, that formed in conditions where you have only few options to do after work - eat, sleep, fuck someone or listen stories from old men.
>And the bible itself.
Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
>they are even willing to claim that the roots of chinese civilization were semitic too.
Source? The roots of Chinese civilization are Central Asian, not Semitic though.
>>403251
>to send nose
Written by approximately same sandnigger from Iran.
>we ultimately know these things don't exist in this world, yet we still have to view religious ceremonies as a kind of con in the end
Religion is just kind of entertainment, that formed in conditions where you have only few options to do after work - eat, sleep, fuck someone or listen stories from old men.
>And the bible itself.
Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
>they are even willing to claim that the roots of chinese civilization were semitic too.
Source? The roots of Chinese civilization are Central Asian, not Semitic though.
>>403251
>to send nose
Written by approximately same sandnigger from Iran.
>>404446
>Religion is just kind of entertainment
Entertainment is definitely a factor, but it takes a backseat to more serious utilities of religion, such as giving people a sense of meaning in their lives or forming the foundations for morality in culture.
>Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
It's more accurate to say that Christianity and Judaism have common roots. Modern, Talmudic Judaism only emerged centuries after Christianity was already a thing.
>Religion is just kind of entertainment
Entertainment is definitely a factor, but it takes a backseat to more serious utilities of religion, such as giving people a sense of meaning in their lives or forming the foundations for morality in culture.
>Christianity is a branch of Judaism.
It's more accurate to say that Christianity and Judaism have common roots. Modern, Talmudic Judaism only emerged centuries after Christianity was already a thing.