https://gulfnews.com/world/cancers-new-nemesis-mrna-based-jab-zaps-tumours-enters-human-trials-1.500398782
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/providence-therapeutics-announces-world-first-130000097.html
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/merck-moderna-cancer-vaccine-sustains-49-melanoma-risk-reduction-5-years
mRNA cancer vaccines are going into human trials. An effective personalized and cheap therapy is on the horizon. How will this change healthcare? How will RNA technology change healthcare in general?
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
50 replies and 5 files omitted.
>>403322
>long covid
I severely doubt the existence of this part of the disease. Most people just get it once and get back on their feet in 1-2 weeks at worst. I surmise it's a vicious cycle of fear and stress manifesting flu-like symptoms which incur more fear and stress.
>long covid
I severely doubt the existence of this part of the disease. Most people just get it once and get back on their feet in 1-2 weeks at worst. I surmise it's a vicious cycle of fear and stress manifesting flu-like symptoms which incur more fear and stress.
>>403073
>taking a cancer shot made by the same people pushing clot shots so you become their property though legalism
How about you just take ivermectin regularly.
It's cheap
It's not patented
It's nearly harmless
Dosing is easy
It works as preventative medicine
It doesn't fuel cancer unlike fenbendazole and some cancers
It makes you kill fleas and lice
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.
>The Supreme Court rulings on GMO ownership, such as in the cases of Monsanto Canada Inc v. Schmeiser and Bowman v. Monsanto Co., established that patent rights extend to genetically modified organisms, meaning that farmers cannot save and replant patented seeds without permission from the patent holder. These decisions affirmed the rights of companies like Monsanto to control the use of their patented genetic material, even if it inadvertently appears in a farmer's field.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8415024/
>Ivermectin Inhibits the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Changes the Morphology of Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Increases Caspase 3/7 Activity in SW480 and SW1116 Cells
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505114/
>Melanoma is the most common malignant skin tumor with a high mortality rate. Drugs targeting BRAF mutations such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib and PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab have greatly improved the prognosis of melanoma [71,72]. Gallardo treated melanoma cells with IVM and found that it could effectively inhibit melanoma activity [73]. Interestingly, IVM could also show activity against BRAF wild-type melanoma cells, and its combination with dapafinib could significantly increase antitumor activity. Additionally, it has been confirmed that PAK1 is the key target of IVM that mediates its anti-melanoma activity, and IVM can also significantly reduce the lung metastasis of melanoma in animal experiments. Deng found that IVM could activate the nuclear translocation of TFE3 and induce autophagy-dependent cell death by dephosphorylation of TFE3 (Ser321) in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells [74]. However, NAC reversed the effect of IVM, which indicated that IVM increased TFE3-dependent autophagy through the ROS signaling pathway.
>taking a cancer shot made by the same people pushing clot shots so you become their property though legalism
How about you just take ivermectin regularly.
It's cheap
It's not patented
It's nearly harmless
Dosing is easy
It works as preventative medicine
It doesn't fuel cancer unlike fenbendazole and some cancers
It makes you kill fleas and lice
Bowman v. Monsanto Co.
>The Supreme Court rulings on GMO ownership, such as in the cases of Monsanto Canada Inc v. Schmeiser and Bowman v. Monsanto Co., established that patent rights extend to genetically modified organisms, meaning that farmers cannot save and replant patented seeds without permission from the patent holder. These decisions affirmed the rights of companies like Monsanto to control the use of their patented genetic material, even if it inadvertently appears in a farmer's field.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8415024/
>Ivermectin Inhibits the Proliferation of Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Changes the Morphology of Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells
>Ivermectin Increases Caspase 3/7 Activity in SW480 and SW1116 Cells
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7505114/
>Melanoma is the most common malignant skin tumor with a high mortality rate. Drugs targeting BRAF mutations such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib and PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, including pembrolizumab and nivolumab have greatly improved the prognosis of melanoma [71,72]. Gallardo treated melanoma cells with IVM and found that it could effectively inhibit melanoma activity [73]. Interestingly, IVM could also show activity against BRAF wild-type melanoma cells, and its combination with dapafinib could significantly increase antitumor activity. Additionally, it has been confirmed that PAK1 is the key target of IVM that mediates its anti-melanoma activity, and IVM can also significantly reduce the lung metastasis of melanoma in animal experiments. Deng found that IVM could activate the nuclear translocation of TFE3 and induce autophagy-dependent cell death by dephosphorylation of TFE3 (Ser321) in SK-MEL-28 melanoma cells [74]. However, NAC reversed the effect of IVM, which indicated that IVM increased TFE3-dependent autophagy through the ROS signaling pathway.
>>403325
>this part of the disease
Yeah that's the funniest part — there never was any disease. It's all been a fucking ruse from the start. Both the "disease" and any "cures" for it.
Anyone taking this seriously, as if it's a real thing, is akin to maggots writhing in a jewish turd. It's yet another distraction and 6 years later fuckwits still keep falling for it.
You people really are fucking trash only fit for being torture toys.
>this part of the disease
Yeah that's the funniest part — there never was any disease. It's all been a fucking ruse from the start. Both the "disease" and any "cures" for it.
Anyone taking this seriously, as if it's a real thing, is akin to maggots writhing in a jewish turd. It's yet another distraction and 6 years later fuckwits still keep falling for it.
You people really are fucking trash only fit for being torture toys.
>>403330
You said a lotta nothin'.
Whether it's a flu-like disease, a normal flu amped by mass hysteria, or just mass hysteria manifesting sickness, it doesn't change what I typed in any way, which is "I don't believe the long-term symptoms is a thing".
You said a lotta nothin'.
Whether it's a flu-like disease, a normal flu amped by mass hysteria, or just mass hysteria manifesting sickness, it doesn't change what I typed in any way, which is "I don't believe the long-term symptoms is a thing".
>>403325
Long covid is very real, but the more times you have been vaccinated or had the disease the less likely you are to get long covid. Ommicron was the real hero of the pandemic. Thank God for optimal virulence.
>>403328
mRNA cancer be personalized to the specific tumor. Ivermectin is fine as an adjunct therapy, but it cannot be tailor made to fight tumors specific to the patient.
Long covid is very real, but the more times you have been vaccinated or had the disease the less likely you are to get long covid. Ommicron was the real hero of the pandemic. Thank God for optimal virulence.
>>403328
mRNA cancer be personalized to the specific tumor. Ivermectin is fine as an adjunct therapy, but it cannot be tailor made to fight tumors specific to the patient.
>>403332
>the more times you have been vaccinated or had the disease the less likely you are to get long covid
I suppose it gets easier to stop believing viruses are inside you once you substantiate that viruses are indeed inside you. The end result is the same either way: you stop feeling sick. That's really what matters.
>the more times you have been vaccinated or had the disease the less likely you are to get long covid
I suppose it gets easier to stop believing viruses are inside you once you substantiate that viruses are indeed inside you. The end result is the same either way: you stop feeling sick. That's really what matters.
>>403334
I think it matters greatly if a virus can cause long term damage and if a vaccine can help prevent that. It's certainly a part of the debate on the covid vaccine. We also know that long covid patients have distinct biomarkers that indicate the presence of long covid. It's not all in their heads.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70613
I think it matters greatly if a virus can cause long term damage and if a vaccine can help prevent that. It's certainly a part of the debate on the covid vaccine. We also know that long covid patients have distinct biomarkers that indicate the presence of long covid. It's not all in their heads.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70613
>>403335
>unique biomarkers
>literally presence of internal bleeding
I think that's a far bigger elephant in the room but I ain't a doctor so I'll accept it.
>unique biomarkers
>literally presence of internal bleeding
I think that's a far bigger elephant in the room but I ain't a doctor so I'll accept it.
>>403339
And the correlation of these "microclots" does NOT mean it's caused by covid, cuz only 10-30% show display "long covid", so miss me with that shit.
Something else caused these tiny gashes in the bloodstream, which led the body to attempt to fix it, which traps viral particles, which the body also attempts to fix through the immune response, and since clots imply some form of partially obstructed bloodflow, I guess that actually does explain the wide range of inconsistent symptoms.
Perhaps it's genetic, or unhealthy living, or maybe from vaxxmaxxing, but something caused this whole-body internal bleeding that cascaded into feeling sick far longer than the disease itself lasts.
And the correlation of these "microclots" does NOT mean it's caused by covid, cuz only 10-30% show display "long covid", so miss me with that shit.
Something else caused these tiny gashes in the bloodstream, which led the body to attempt to fix it, which traps viral particles, which the body also attempts to fix through the immune response, and since clots imply some form of partially obstructed bloodflow, I guess that actually does explain the wide range of inconsistent symptoms.
Perhaps it's genetic, or unhealthy living, or maybe from vaxxmaxxing, but something caused this whole-body internal bleeding that cascaded into feeling sick far longer than the disease itself lasts.
>>403122
>My mind immediately screams "vaccination". You know, the kind that we all go through as young children and beyond. These days they vaccinate unborn children, straight up injections into a fetus. I'm pretty confident that it's a mutilation/debilitation/enslavement technique, one of many. Life-long poisoning that, in some, develops to a more severe degree.
Yeah, it really isn't impossible. Like I got injected with vaccines as a boy and I have ocd and ADHD. Of course, there could be other reasons for that, too. It's hard to tell. I'm not knowledgeable about these things, so it really is up in the air for me.
Tho from my understanding, cancer is too much cell division. A cell has something call telemores that dictate how many times it can divide itself. This is basically aging, as cells can no longer divide even though its needed for survival. Here's a crackpot theory I just came up with, perhaps they are conducting human experiments on us in their pursuit of immortality,or hitting two birbs with one stone.
>No cat allergy
That's strange. Did you not have it, or has it genuinely disappeared? What has changed in terms of lifestyle or whatever since when you had it too now, you think?
>Covid vax
I didn't take the vaccine because I didn't, and don't, trust the authorities as stated. Though, I have no clue if its medicine or poison or both. All I knew was that I wasn't in a risk group, nor could it be that deadly if its spread across the entire world somehow. And I basically didn't interact with people at the time being a neat up at night an all.
>>403145
Yeah. That's true. Though, we could totally make budget versions of our products if we weren't strung up by all the regulations that we need to follow that developing nations don't have.
Like, because of the international market, simple jobs have been outsourced to developing nations for cheaper costs. But once one thinks about that, it reveals how unethical and crazy that statement is. Like, transporting goods like food and simple items across the entire world, is somehow cheaper than just making it all locally.
Like our countries arn't "industry" nations anymore, they are like house of cards luxury resorts while the "developing" nations are the industry nations now. It's goofy to like watch india clips and such because people in media in the west will talk them up and sure they are doing things ig but at the same times, they have no regulations or standards we have in our ccountries so buying products from their can only be viewed as immoral by our own standards but they still allow it. Like, I have seen Indians off load trucks of garbage in a local river. I have seen other stuff I try not to think about... They don't have to worry aobut regulations, they can just raise a house next on another if there is space and that's waht they do.
Also, this rant wasn't directed at you I know you didn't disagree, just wanted to rant about how bonkers it is.
>>403152
It's part of something I been thinking of lately. Like, a peacock chick and a chicken chik have different long periods of childhood. Normal chicks need their mothers for four weeks while peacock chicks need them for six months. Often, things that are more intelligent in nature, it seems to me, need a longer period with their parents...
Honestly, it's a long thing. But bottom line is, I don't think if we are gonna have school the way we have it now, I wish we could move it up to when children are around 12 or something. Putting six year olds together... They are basically not ready for it. Secondly, is that divorces is bad for childrens development. Look, I'm not banning it, I just think that I wish we built society around trying to make marriages last and work, rather than just have it as it is now. Like, stepfathers can't be expected to genuinely love their step son. Like, my abusive stepfather, like I can sympathize with him somewhat today, because he wanted my mom, not me, in his life so of course he didn't love me. Now, he didn't need to be abusive and perhaps he could have another form of relationship with me but ultimately I do get it on some level.
<there are no races, it's just skin color and stuff
>It's consequence of WW2.
Yeah, they could push that narrative that it really was the national socialist that were the real race supremacist. So, yeah, I agree, though, when I think about it, they probably make up something if they had nothing... They did make up something. I forgot. ^^
>My mind immediately screams "vaccination". You know, the kind that we all go through as young children and beyond. These days they vaccinate unborn children, straight up injections into a fetus. I'm pretty confident that it's a mutilation/debilitation/enslavement technique, one of many. Life-long poisoning that, in some, develops to a more severe degree.
Yeah, it really isn't impossible. Like I got injected with vaccines as a boy and I have ocd and ADHD. Of course, there could be other reasons for that, too. It's hard to tell. I'm not knowledgeable about these things, so it really is up in the air for me.
Tho from my understanding, cancer is too much cell division. A cell has something call telemores that dictate how many times it can divide itself. This is basically aging, as cells can no longer divide even though its needed for survival. Here's a crackpot theory I just came up with, perhaps they are conducting human experiments on us in their pursuit of immortality,or hitting two birbs with one stone.
>No cat allergy
That's strange. Did you not have it, or has it genuinely disappeared? What has changed in terms of lifestyle or whatever since when you had it too now, you think?
>Covid vax
I didn't take the vaccine because I didn't, and don't, trust the authorities as stated. Though, I have no clue if its medicine or poison or both. All I knew was that I wasn't in a risk group, nor could it be that deadly if its spread across the entire world somehow. And I basically didn't interact with people at the time being a neat up at night an all.
>>403145
Yeah. That's true. Though, we could totally make budget versions of our products if we weren't strung up by all the regulations that we need to follow that developing nations don't have.
Like, because of the international market, simple jobs have been outsourced to developing nations for cheaper costs. But once one thinks about that, it reveals how unethical and crazy that statement is. Like, transporting goods like food and simple items across the entire world, is somehow cheaper than just making it all locally.
Like our countries arn't "industry" nations anymore, they are like house of cards luxury resorts while the "developing" nations are the industry nations now. It's goofy to like watch india clips and such because people in media in the west will talk them up and sure they are doing things ig but at the same times, they have no regulations or standards we have in our ccountries so buying products from their can only be viewed as immoral by our own standards but they still allow it. Like, I have seen Indians off load trucks of garbage in a local river. I have seen other stuff I try not to think about... They don't have to worry aobut regulations, they can just raise a house next on another if there is space and that's waht they do.
Also, this rant wasn't directed at you I know you didn't disagree, just wanted to rant about how bonkers it is.
>>403152
It's part of something I been thinking of lately. Like, a peacock chick and a chicken chik have different long periods of childhood. Normal chicks need their mothers for four weeks while peacock chicks need them for six months. Often, things that are more intelligent in nature, it seems to me, need a longer period with their parents...
Honestly, it's a long thing. But bottom line is, I don't think if we are gonna have school the way we have it now, I wish we could move it up to when children are around 12 or something. Putting six year olds together... They are basically not ready for it. Secondly, is that divorces is bad for childrens development. Look, I'm not banning it, I just think that I wish we built society around trying to make marriages last and work, rather than just have it as it is now. Like, stepfathers can't be expected to genuinely love their step son. Like, my abusive stepfather, like I can sympathize with him somewhat today, because he wanted my mom, not me, in his life so of course he didn't love me. Now, he didn't need to be abusive and perhaps he could have another form of relationship with me but ultimately I do get it on some level.
<there are no races, it's just skin color and stuff
>It's consequence of WW2.
Yeah, they could push that narrative that it really was the national socialist that were the real race supremacist. So, yeah, I agree, though, when I think about it, they probably make up something if they had nothing... They did make up something. I forgot. ^^
>>403332
>it cannot be tailor made to fight tumors specific to the patient
Who cares.
Nuke them all.
Billions of cancer cells must die.
Why target specific cancers when you just kill them all.
Using mRNA to activate the immune system against host cells will cause more auto-immune diseases just like with MMR and TDAP vaccines.
>it cannot be tailor made to fight tumors specific to the patient
Who cares.
Nuke them all.
Billions of cancer cells must die.
Why target specific cancers when you just kill them all.
Using mRNA to activate the immune system against host cells will cause more auto-immune diseases just like with MMR and TDAP vaccines.
>>403358
Ivermectin cannot be used in every case. It isn't a panacea. mRNA is great because you could tailor it to any tumor. Not all cancers are the same.
Ivermectin cannot be used in every case. It isn't a panacea. mRNA is great because you could tailor it to any tumor. Not all cancers are the same.
>>403368
All cancers get fuel by the same process. A fermentation like process that requires certain elements to occur.
All cancers get fuel by the same process. A fermentation like process that requires certain elements to occur.
>>403368
>Ivermectin cannot be used in every case
Ivermectin is only one option.
Some existing drugs have known anti-cancer properties, but oncologists won't use them off-label, and they're controlled substances so it's impossible for large scale out-of-system experimentation.
Fenbendazole targets other cancers than ivermectin, and other anti-parasitics might have similar effects.
Even shitty compounds like SSRIs have anti-cancer effects.
>it isn't a panacea
It's a panacea for all the reasons I've listed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/
mRNA will be gatekept, as well as the obvious corpo enslavement issues.
>Ivermectin cannot be used in every case
Ivermectin is only one option.
Some existing drugs have known anti-cancer properties, but oncologists won't use them off-label, and they're controlled substances so it's impossible for large scale out-of-system experimentation.
Fenbendazole targets other cancers than ivermectin, and other anti-parasitics might have similar effects.
Even shitty compounds like SSRIs have anti-cancer effects.
>it isn't a panacea
It's a panacea for all the reasons I've listed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32474842/
mRNA will be gatekept, as well as the obvious corpo enslavement issues.
>>403376
It's a good adjunct therapy but why would mRNA be gate kept but not ivermectin. And what corpo enslavement?
It's a good adjunct therapy but why would mRNA be gate kept but not ivermectin. And what corpo enslavement?
>>403374
Different mutations can cause different cancers. They aren't all the same and the body does not recognize them as the same. Thats the beauty of mRNA. Now we have a tool that can train the body to recognize any cancer.
Different mutations can cause different cancers. They aren't all the same and the body does not recognize them as the same. Thats the beauty of mRNA. Now we have a tool that can train the body to recognize any cancer.
>>403377
>And what corpo enslavement
In the USA if you allow a corpo to modify your genes with their genetic intellectual property, you become property of the corporation.
Bowman v. Monsanto Co. applies to all genetically modified organisms within the USA.
>And what corpo enslavement
In the USA if you allow a corpo to modify your genes with their genetic intellectual property, you become property of the corporation.
Bowman v. Monsanto Co. applies to all genetically modified organisms within the USA.
>>403406
1 mRNA does not modify your genes. 2 people do not become property of pharmaceutical companies after reviewing gene therapy. No one with the sickle cell treatment became a slave after getting treatment and you are retarded for believing that they did.
1 mRNA does not modify your genes. 2 people do not become property of pharmaceutical companies after reviewing gene therapy. No one with the sickle cell treatment became a slave after getting treatment and you are retarded for believing that they did.
>>403416
Quit posting in bad faith and learn to use search engines.
>1 mRNA does not modify your genes.
Reverse transcription happens.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8946961/
It happens all the time with faggots.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/reverse-transcription
>2 people do not become property of pharmaceutical companies after reviewing gene therapy
Of course, because reviewing is just ingesting information and producing a conclusion.
Receiving is another issue altogether, and the supreme court has been clear on this, you have failed to review litigation surrounding the subject of genetically modified organisms.
Now imagine, would a pharma company enslave everyone that it modifies at the beginning of commercializing it's intellectual property?
No, that's stupid. Wait a few decades once you have a few hundred thousand or million.
Current recipients are likely under full medical surveillance as part of their treatment agreements, and that data is commodified.
The world is at your fingertips and you refuse to accept truth. Why are you even here?
Quit posting in bad faith and learn to use search engines.
>1 mRNA does not modify your genes.
Reverse transcription happens.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8946961/
It happens all the time with faggots.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/reverse-transcription
>2 people do not become property of pharmaceutical companies after reviewing gene therapy
Of course, because reviewing is just ingesting information and producing a conclusion.
Receiving is another issue altogether, and the supreme court has been clear on this, you have failed to review litigation surrounding the subject of genetically modified organisms.
Now imagine, would a pharma company enslave everyone that it modifies at the beginning of commercializing it's intellectual property?
No, that's stupid. Wait a few decades once you have a few hundred thousand or million.
Current recipients are likely under full medical surveillance as part of their treatment agreements, and that data is commodified.
The world is at your fingertips and you refuse to accept truth. Why are you even here?
>>403440
That study you linked was done in a cancer cell culture (huh7 is a cancer cell line) LINE1 is especially active in cancer cells and is either completely silent in normal cells or heavily regulated. On top of that the dose the cancer cells received was much higher than anything they would recieve in vivo. Why would you think this study translates to normal conditions?
That study you linked was done in a cancer cell culture (huh7 is a cancer cell line) LINE1 is especially active in cancer cells and is either completely silent in normal cells or heavily regulated. On top of that the dose the cancer cells received was much higher than anything they would recieve in vivo. Why would you think this study translates to normal conditions?
>>403440
In the second example RNA viruses have reverse transcriptase and integrase to insert their genomes. mRNA does not have either of these.
In the second example RNA viruses have reverse transcriptase and integrase to insert their genomes. mRNA does not have either of these.
>>403440
Oy meant to type recieve. Fucking phone. But people who recieve gene therapy for sickle cell or cancer do not become property. That is just observable reality.
Oy meant to type recieve. Fucking phone. But people who recieve gene therapy for sickle cell or cancer do not become property. That is just observable reality.
>>403441
I would also like to point out this one unreplicated cancer cell culture study in mdpi is the only peice of evidence you guys have of reverse transcription *the study even says it doesn't prove integration "At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome." And this study is 4 years old. This is the ONLY evidence you have of this and cancer cell cultures are notoriously bad at replicating results. I find it funny that antivaxxers are usually the first people to point out the replication crisis and then base their entire theory on a single unreplicated cancer cell culture study from 4 years ago in mdpi.
I would also like to point out this one unreplicated cancer cell culture study in mdpi is the only peice of evidence you guys have of reverse transcription *the study even says it doesn't prove integration "At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome." And this study is 4 years old. This is the ONLY evidence you have of this and cancer cell cultures are notoriously bad at replicating results. I find it funny that antivaxxers are usually the first people to point out the replication crisis and then base their entire theory on a single unreplicated cancer cell culture study from 4 years ago in mdpi.
>>403440
The only precedent for owning the genetics of organisms is Monsanto's claim on Round-Up-Ready soybeans, and even that stands on shaky legal ground. Do you seriously think that would apply to humans?
If their lawyers were all-powerful enough to override anti-slavety legislation, they wouldn't even need people to be genetically modified to enslave them, because they would be do powerful that they would have no need to beat around the bush.
The only precedent for owning the genetics of organisms is Monsanto's claim on Round-Up-Ready soybeans, and even that stands on shaky legal ground. Do you seriously think that would apply to humans?
If their lawyers were all-powerful enough to override anti-slavety legislation, they wouldn't even need people to be genetically modified to enslave them, because they would be do powerful that they would have no need to beat around the bush.
>>403445
Oh how hilariously wrong you are. There are currently thousands of genetically modified, in no particular order: bacterium, lab mice, lab rats, "novel"/new strain/modified strain/protected strain flora, guinea pigs, actual pigs, several bovines, horses, dogs, cats, and sheep, which have been 'patented'.
It IS correct to state that patents on organisms cannot be filed, nor held... but here we fucking are: judges across the US have 'ruled' from the bench (which is illegal, but they have absolute impunity so oh well) that companies can do so, and that such patents are 'legal'. You didn't even do the tiniest fucking bit of research to find this out.
Oh how hilariously wrong you are. There are currently thousands of genetically modified, in no particular order: bacterium, lab mice, lab rats, "novel"/new strain/modified strain/protected strain flora, guinea pigs, actual pigs, several bovines, horses, dogs, cats, and sheep, which have been 'patented'.
It IS correct to state that patents on organisms cannot be filed, nor held... but here we fucking are: judges across the US have 'ruled' from the bench (which is illegal, but they have absolute impunity so oh well) that companies can do so, and that such patents are 'legal'. You didn't even do the tiniest fucking bit of research to find this out.
It's only gonna be an issue when some nerds engineer a specialized human being. Hell, might already be a thing, it's just never gonna be public knowledge.
>>403073
>Who is behind it? Same ones as the jabculling
Yeah fuck off. I had covid twice and the 2nd time was because of the vax shedding from a family member. Longcovid was directly caused spike protein overdose, which you can get from viral bioweapon or vax bioweapon. You can bet if this is supposed to cure cancer it will give you it instead.
Ever since covid the technojews have been pushing hard into culling, and with gayi they want another excuse to cull if it doesn't work, or withhold the (((mRNA cancer vax))) if it does work with some digital ID fuck you health system. you're opted into.
Never forget that the vax massively increased cancer rates, they created the problem by turning off the body's ability to self-modulate with the spike protein creating a cascade of inflammation and genetic damage. And now they want to sell you the cure.
>Who is behind it? Same ones as the jabculling
Yeah fuck off. I had covid twice and the 2nd time was because of the vax shedding from a family member. Longcovid was directly caused spike protein overdose, which you can get from viral bioweapon or vax bioweapon. You can bet if this is supposed to cure cancer it will give you it instead.
Ever since covid the technojews have been pushing hard into culling, and with gayi they want another excuse to cull if it doesn't work, or withhold the (((mRNA cancer vax))) if it does work with some digital ID fuck you health system. you're opted into.
Never forget that the vax massively increased cancer rates, they created the problem by turning off the body's ability to self-modulate with the spike protein creating a cascade of inflammation and genetic damage. And now they want to sell you the cure.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-79] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
79 replies | 6 files | 31 UUIDs | Page 10