/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

110 replies |  13 files |  33 UUIDs |  Page 3
1493363674.jpg
The Energy Crisis
Anonymous
2e2b429
?
No.392472
392506 392517 392552 393434 393463 393597
What fuel source(s) will solve the energy crisis? We are running out of oil, coal does too much damage to the environment, solar and other renewables are still too inefficient, and we just don't have the technology for fusion reactors. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts /mlpol/.
10 replies and 1 files omitted.
Anonymous
e5a14dd
?
No.392524
392548 392550
>>392517
The biggest problem with dirt and gravel roads is the dust that gets kicked up. Any real amount of traffic, or even just one jackwagon driving faster than a crawl, and visibility is reduced to practically zero.

That isn't to say it's useless. It would work extremely well for local roads, because you're (supposed to be) at low speed anyway. Frankly dirt or gravel would probably encourage that more than a sign. Rural roads are iffy because generally things are far enough apart you want to be going at speed, but usually the traffic is light enough for the dust to settle before the next vehicle comes along. Unless it's planting/harvesting season. Mud ruts would be a problem if they aren't maintained well, and since most roads are government owned, mud ruts will be a problem.

I don't believe it would be wise to try dirt or gravel for collectors or arterials though. Too many vehicles going too fast. Dust blindness would be a constant and completely negate the purpose of the road class by destroying speed and thus throughput. You could probably replace most arterials with rail, but even if they did that still leaves collectors.

Concrete is an alternative to asphalt, however I've been told it degrades faster and more significantly.
Anonymous
2e2b429
?
No.392527
392547
>>392523
Oil takes millions of years to form. We use it faster then it forms.
Anonymous
bf0f26a
?
No.392547
392549 392565
>>392527
>Oil takes millions of years to form
no it doesn't.
Anonymous
bf0f26a
?
No.392548
>>392524
>even just one jackwagon driving faster than a crawl
i drive an impreza, yea it's not a ferrari but it can go 60 MPH all the same, and there are dirty roads here and there where i can drive at 60mph without dust kicking up. i guess if it's abnormally dry?
Anonymous
9814b15
?
No.392549
>>392547
Yes, but, the fabrication of oil (depending on the ingredients used) is either an expensive process, or a prohibitably expensive process.
Anonymous
bf0f26a
?
No.392550
392557 392565 392593
>>392524
>Concrete is an alternative to asphalt, however I've been told it degrades faster and more significantly.
lol...tell that to the roman aquaduct. then there's old joke, how many seasons does chicago have? two, winter and construction. because asphalt breaks almost as easily as dirt, arguably more. in the rust belt there are always potholes in the aftermath of winter.

the taconic parkway (in new york state) was concrete and it lasted until they recently replaced it with asphalt last year(2 years ago?), and it's falling apart already.

the people who tell you that concrete breaks more are probably trying to sell you asphlat.
Anonymous
05650d3
?
No.392552
392565
>>392472
They have been talking about the environment, energy crises and depletion of reserves for 60 years, and they are still not being exhausted. You just have to use it wisely.
>>392474
The problem is that uranium is non-renewable.
Anonymous
05650d3
?
No.392553
>>392506
>Why Britain stopped coal mining? Why Germany stopped it
Because eco-activists?
>Why Ukraine, formerly industrial center of Soviet Union turned into European Palestine
Specifically at the moment Ukraine is at war. And in the period 1991-2014 nobody needed coal, even in Russia.
Anonymous
05650d3
?
No.392555
>>392523
Oil is not a poop, retard. It is the remains (particularly bones) of various organisms that lived millions of years ago. And this oil was formed over the same millions of years.

And synthetic oil is made primarily from coal.
Anonymous
05650d3
?
No.392557
>>392550
You don't drive cars on Roman aqueducts. And, oddly enough, Roman aqueducts have not come down to us in perfect condition. They're ruined.
Anonymous
2e2b429
?
No.392565
>>392547
Yes it does. Petroleum geologists can agree on that much.
>>392550
Roman concrete lasts longer than our roads because it doesn't have to deal with the same stresses from traffic.
>>392552
Uranium might not be renewable, but there is enough of it to last for thousands of years. That's plenty of time to develop fusion.
Anonymous
e5a14dd
?
No.392593
>>392550
The guy who told me that said he worked 30 years for Indiana's DOT. Barring corruption (always a possibility) I doubt he was trying to sell me on asphalt.
Anonymous
b99a4db
?
No.393434
393435 393436
>>392472
Fuck the environment.
Use the coal.
It helps to create jobs.
Anonymous
edf5b39
?
No.393435
393436
>>393434
Biogasification of coal might be an option that could both be environmentally friendly and create jobs.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393436
393437
>>393434
>>393435
Nuclear energy is king.
Anonymous
edf5b39
?
No.393437
393438
>>393436
Agreed, but biogasification of coal can also be used to produce polymers, solvents, and fertilizers.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393438
393439 393444
>>393437
Yes, but the energy needed to produce those polymers is better derived from nuclear.
Nuclear is the most-powerful and least-polluting source of energy on earth.
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393439
393441 393442 393446
>>393438
So long as you don't mind your multi-city powerplant melting every so often, leaving several nearby cities unlivable for the next seven to ten decades.

I've read a few interesting thoughts about nuclear power. One, that fusion is doable but resembles juggling marbles using rubber bands that you have to hold from outside the box where the juggling needs to happen
Two is, that yes fission generators could be made safe but that's so expensive, and corporations are so greedy and short sighted that only a crazed madman who should never be in charge of any construction team could be qualified to direct the construction of our nuclear power plants.

I recommend, personally, focusing on power production we can personally understand and manufacture. Fusion might get there, atmospheric energy has potential to ease the load, ZPE modules probably actually exist and/or could exist

Except of course "they" only allow energy they can tax you for. So the first step in solving the energy crisis is eliminating the government (or variations on that theme)
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393441
393461
>>393439
>melting every so often
100% preventable, unless you're a retarded slavshit commie yes-man who can't even boil water.
>Two is, that yes fission generators could be made safe but that's so expensive, and corporations are so greedy and short sighted that only a crazed madman who should never be in charge of any construction team could be qualified to direct the construction of our nuclear power plants.
This is where regulation and inspection comes into play. Corporations should need to compete for quality standards for the privilege of building nuclear facilities.
>focusing on power production we can personally understand and manufacture
We can understand and manufacture nuclear energy. It's not as complicated as it sounds.
Anonymous
edf5b39
?
No.393442
>>393439
You seem to be under the impression that nuclear engineers have been sitting with their thumbs up their asses since the 1980's. That's not the case. Modern reactors are much safer especially the thorium reactors that are finally being rolled out.
Anonymous
edf5b39
?
No.393444
>>393438
Agreed for the most part. Fuel could be made for combustion engines from the biogas. I'm not convinced that lithium ion batteries are better for the environment than combustion engines. Sodium ion batteries and calcium ion batteries may be solutions though, but the technology is not as mature.
Anonymous
e5a14dd
?
No.393446
393461
>>393439
>leaving several nearby cities unlivable for the next seven to ten decades.
Fukushima and the area around Three Mile Island are perfectly habitable and their accidents are more recent than Chernobyl. We shouldn't abandon nuclear power just because of one major incident from the early days, just as we didn't abandon boilers when they kept blowing up factories and steamships randomly in the 1800s.
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393461
393478 393481 393488
>>393441
>100% preventable
yes but that's never been done, so it defacto isn't simply because humans would be building the thing.

>Corporations should need to compete
yeah, umm...do you not know how terrible that would be? "corporations competing" involves buying favors. the "standards" would be lowered for this particular installation based on how well they greased governmental palms.

>>393446
>just as we didn't abandon boilers
I'm not trying to stand in the way of progress for the sake of being a fuddy-duddy, I just don't trust government regulators, and corporate regulators interacting with government is exactly where the "deep state" got most of its cash in the first place.

thus,
>>393441
>It's not as complicated as it sounds.
You build one in your garage, and I'll believe you.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393463
393477 393479
>>392472
>What fuel source(s) will solve the energy crisis?
Repatriate 75 million non-Whites and their children. Then the economy temporally will collapse, however fewer people will compensate for the unemployment. All which will traduce in a country with less need for energy.
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393477
>>393463
the approach from 2030 is to directly kill fifteen out of every 16 people, and spread the survivors evenly across 1,000 cities allowed to remain
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393478
>>393461
>yes but that's never been done
It's done all the time. There are lots of nuclear plants with no problems whatsoever. The handful of nuclear accidents were all completely preventable.
Nuclear energy has killed the fewest people per unit of energy generated, including all those preventable nuclear disasters in history. Even windmills kill more people.
Coalfire power plants leak more radiation than nuclear power plants too, because they can't figure out what to do with the toxic coal ash.
>"corporations competing" involves buying favors
No, that's just cronyism, not competition.
They should compete to show who can offer the best quality standards.
>the "standards" would be lowered for this particular installation based on how well they greased governmental palms
That can go for any infrastructure; that doesn't mean we should never build anything ever. Kill all of the corrupt government bureaucrats, and then we can have nice things.
>You build one in your garage
That's illegal, for a good reason. I know how it works though.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393479
393501 393602
>>393463
I agree with purging shitskins, but the question was how to produce more energy.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393481
393502
>>393461
>I just don't trust government regulators, and corporate regulators interacting with government is exactly where the "deep state" got most of its cash in the first place.
Then you should move into a mud hut in the middle of the Sahara desert, because every kind of electricity infrastructure can cause mass casualty events with improper management and bad regulation. Oil spills, coal ash contamination, groundwater corruption, wildfires, fiberglass contamination, burst dams, fishkills, spent solar panel pollution, earthquakes, deforestation, etc.
Nuclear energy is the safest source of energy by far. If you would deal with the consequences of oil/coal/wind-turbines/solar-panels/dams/natural-gas/woodfire/etc, which are all vastly more polluting and dangerous, you should also be able to accept nuclear energy.
Anonymous
e5a14dd
?
No.393488
>>393461
The problem with government regulators is the competent ones don't have the power to do anything about issues. See the USCSB. However in regards to nuclear regulators I believe the USNRC does have the authority to take real action.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393501
393503
>>393479
>but the question was how to produce more energy.
But why would you want to do that? That policy is not aligned with an isolationist America First.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393502
393503
>>393481
>Then you should move into a mud hut in the middle of the Sahara desert
Nope. Anon has a point. Nuclear is an avenue for more corruption.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393503
393504
>>393501
>But why would you want to do that?
...So we can use it? To keep prices down and increase productivity and meet our technological demands.
>That policy is not aligned with an isolationist America First.
Yes it is. Having access to cheap, abundant energy is in the interest of all Americans.
>>393502
It is no more corrupt than any other source of energy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393504
393505
>>393503
>So we can use it? To keep prices down and increase productivity and meet our technological demands
America First means to downsizing. The Treasury is broke and an about face is a must.
>It is no more corrupt than any other source of energy
It requires investment and America First is about to balance the books.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393505
393506
>>393504
>America First means to downsizing.
It does not have to be that way. Nobody voted for energy austerity.
>The Treasury is broke and an about face is a must.
That's all the more reason to produce more energy.
>It requires investment
All sources of energy require investment.
>America First is about to balance the books.
All the 'America first' politicians are pro-nuclear, and pro increasing energy production across the board. You are the first person I've encountered who thinks 'America first' somehow means LESS energy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393506
393507
>>393505
>Nobody voted for energy austerity.
You will have no energy austerity because the economy will shrink, of course if Trumps delivers with deporting 50-75 millions.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393507
393509
>>393506
>You will have no energy austerity because the economy will shrink
It does not have to do that.
>of course if Trumps delivers with deporting 50-75 millions
Deporting shitskins parasites would grow the economy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393509
393511
>>393507
>It does not have to do that.
Yes, it will. Removing 50-75 million of consumers will do the trick.
>Deporting shitskins parasites would grow the economy.
No, it will create an economic shock, the real state market will crash (think Wall Street and the '''landlords'''), retail will go in smoke, the health industry will be paralyzed, and an acute shortage of labor will explode. Add to that cutting the lifeline of government jobs and most of the artificial and parasitical medium class will disappear.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393511
393512 393514
>>393509
>Removing 50-75 million of consumers will do the trick.
And that would grow the economy in the long term, because it would remove the financial strain of illegals and criminals preventing people from building businesses and having families and raising their standards of living across the board.
And regardless, people will still want cheaper energy.
>muh shock
You talk like a liberal. Deporting illegals is beneficial to our economy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393512
393513
>>393511
>And that would grow the economy in the long term
That's the idea. But first the non-White gangrene must be cut. Extremely painful for the wallet, but it must be done.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393513
>>393512
Okay. Sure. Let's deport all the shitskins.
I still want more nuclear energy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393514
393515
>>393511
>because it would remove the financial strain of illegals and criminals preventing people from building businesses and having families and raising their standards of living across the board.
>illegals
Illegals are the low hanging fruit and drop in the bucket, the real threat are the LEGALS with citizenship.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393515
393517
>>393514
Okay. Kill all the shitskins.
This is barely relevant to the topic of energy policy.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393517
393518
>>393515
>This is barely relevant
They are totally relevant because they are energy consumers.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393518
393519
sample_aa980862dc078aee416ea12d69da9958.jpg
>>393517
We're talking about how to produce more energy here. Go make a separate thread for that.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393519
393520
>>393518
>to produce more energy
I see what's behind the idea. Musk and his tech friends want to expand production to fuel their data-centers.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393520
393524 393563
>>393519
Sure, that's one use of energy. Abundant energy supplies can fuel industries and increase quality of life for many.

Anyways, back up the topic of energy sources. I am pro-nuclear, but I am also open to the expansion of geothermal energy in places where it's available. Natural gas is a given.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393523
>>393522
Make a separate thread on >>>/cyb/ to complain about data centers. We're talking about how to increase energy production here.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393524
393525
>>393521
>>393520
>can fuel industries and increase quality of life for many
Data centers are meant to take American jobs and tight oligarch control over the population. Agenda 2030 ring a bell?
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393525
393526
>>393524
We're talking about energy production. Make a separate thread.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393526
393531
837a3.jpg
>>393525
Okay.
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393531
393553 393567
>>393526
>energy production

It's not, of course. He's just stumping for more black-box fission stations doing who knows what because we're not allowed to look or practice it ourselves.
"we can't wait for fusion!"
...says the puppet unwilling to solve the problem by making more energy stations.
They won't let you shut down the coal plants, anyway. Somebody did spectroscopy analysis of the chem-trails, and they predominately resemble coal fly ash. So until everyone is dead, they need the cover of coal power to poison us with silicates and aluminum ions.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393553
393569
>>393531
>He's just stumping for more black-box fission stations
It does not have to be black box. In fact, it should be transparent. The public should know how the technology works.
>puppet
That's rich coming from the faggot who bought into glownigger anti-nuclear propaganda. Literal CIA assets have been seeding anti-nuclear fearmongering for years to prevent nuclear technology from spreading, and you idiots drank the coolaid.
>They won't let you shut down the coal plants, anyway.
I never said that.
Anonymous
1d652bb
?
No.393563
393565
>>393520
Geothermal is a good idea. If you used abandon mines you could probably expand its use too.
Anonymous
47e4de8
?
No.393565
393566 393572
twi.png
>>393563
>Geothermal
Only for volcanic regions, like Iceland.

Overall thermal gradient just 2.5°C for each 100 meters, power 0.03-0.05 W/m², energy 1.3 MJ/m² per year. If humanity build network of 4 km deep geothermal wells with distance 200 meters between them with water as heat carrier, all Earth surface can generate about 9.5 EJ per year. Current world primary energy consumption about 700 EJ per year.
Anonymous
75dbb4c
?
No.393566
Twilight-Sparkle-alcor.jpg
>>393565
>9.5 EJ per year.
Wait, not right, lazy me! It's data for all volcanic places like Iceland, Philippines, etc.
For all Earth surface about 420 EJ.
For land surface only 126 EJ.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393567
393577
>>393531
>black-box fission stations
Kinda not so secret at all.
On paper nuclear reactors are pretty dumb, basically they are a boiler and the produced steam is used to spin an electric generator. That's it.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393569
393579
06a7933.jpg
>>393553
>The public should know how the technology works.
The info and technologies are public domain.
It is mind blowing how in the age of information when every shitskin has a mini computer at his fingertips and access to worldwide information, people are every day more ignorant and lazy.
Anonymous
ad6d9ab
?
No.393572
>>393565
The idea of using geothermal for mines is being explored.

https://www.lancs.live/news/lancashire-news/lancashire-town-plans-bring-abandoned-29578492
Anonymous
d12acb7
?
No.393577
393578
>>393567
>On paper nuclear reactors are pretty dumb, basically they are a boiler and the produced steam is used to spin an electric generator. That's it.
That's not dumb at all.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393578
393589 393596
>>393577
>That's not dumb at all.
It is, really. You have a container with water, you heat that water with fire, or, in this particular case with a hot radioactive rod, then you route the produced steam to a turbine that spins a generator. That's all the deal.
That the propaganda describing it as "super dangerous" and super high-tech is plain exaggeration and bullshit to justify over-inflated contracts to fill the contractors' pockets.
Anonymous
0b02e87
?
No.393579
393580 393582
>>393569
The lying leftist media keeps people ignorant and passive.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393580
fc8896812.jpg
>>393579
>lying leftist media
Not such a thing, it is an uniparty.
Anonymous
10450ee
?
No.393582
393589
b98c6f.jpg
>>393579
>keeps people ignorant and passive
Ew, no.
Most people were born to be slaves and willingly ignoramus and they are very content with that. You cannot change the normie.
Anonymous
f8f622d
?
No.393589
>>393578
>It is, really. You have a container with water, you heat that water with fire, or, in this particular case with a hot radioactive rod, then you route the produced steam to a turbine that spins a generator. That's all the deal.
That's not dumb. It's just simple. There's nothing dumb about it.
>>393582
If you're going to post Facebook memes, at least keep them energy related.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393596
>>393578
>That the propaganda describing it as "super dangerous" and super high-tech is plain exaggeration and bullshit to justify over-inflated contracts to fill the contractors' pockets.
I agree that it is propaganda and over exaggeration, but it's not propaganda for the contractors; it's propaganda on behalf of glowniggers who don't want nuclear technology to spread because they don't want rival countries to have advanced energy or weapons technology.
Overall, you want a nuclear reactor to be built with the best possible quality, not just for safety, but also to harvest the most possible energy out of the fissile materials.
Anonymous
afbd7b9
?
No.393597
393599 393604 393612
>>392472
So I made this exact thread back in 2017 https://mlpol.net/go/623 notice how back in 2017 the thread stayed on the topic on energy production and didn't change into a thread about a mega conspiracy around nuclear power where brainlets accused any disagreement as obedience to the state. Just a really good expirement to show how mlpol has changed over the years.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393599
393600
>>393597
It's because the boomer moved in. He does this in every thread he posts in. Ngl, it's part of the reason why I don't make nearly as many threads as I used to these days.
Anonymous
ad6d9ab
?
No.393600
393601
>>393598
The retards haven't chased me out yet. Although I do wonder where anyone interested in real discussions went.

>>393599
It's more than just boomboom. Ninjaz and the shart poster pull the same shit. Together they are the tard trio and they are destroying the board.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393601
393603 393612
Gu0cOBtXIAAHuUK.jpg
>>393600
True. It's a shame how a handful of persistent, spamming retards can chase off other quality posters on a small board community like this.
Anonymous
edd32a4
?
No.393602
>>393479
The problem is that anything that makes energy more cheap and/or abundant means more people coming into the world. Including lots of undesirables.
Anonymous
afbd7b9
?
No.393603
393607
>>393601
The retards got worse over time too and they are hardly unique to mlpol. The left censored naughty opinions and actively shilled imageboards and it made having honest conversations impossible. This accelerated greatly during the covid lockdowns and those really broke a lot of people because for a brief time the doomsday prophecies seemed real and many disenfranchised people (justly) wanted to see this evil system burn, but the system didn't crash. Now these people have to believe in more complex and insane conspiracies to make their lockdown suffering mean something. Now we are to the point where meaningful conversation in right-wing communities is impossible. Factor in that zoomers, who are completely retarded thanks to our education system and can't make rational arguments to save their lives, are now a major demographic on imageboards and then factor in the bots as well and you have the perfect storm. Think tanks wanted to make these places less fun and they succeeded.
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393604
393605 393606 393608
>>393597
odd, how we haven't run out of energy yet.
Didn't we hit peak-oil in the early 80's?
I guess the polar ice caps haven't really melted either.
It's almost like the focus on fission is a distraction.
Anonymous
cc33067
?
No.393605
>>393604
>Didn't we hit peak-oil in the early 80's?
We hit peak oil production based on known means available in the 80s. New ways to find and extract oil have been discovered since, such as shale.
>I guess the polar ice caps haven't really melted either.
They have melted quite a bit actually. How much of it is man-made and how much of it is due to natural cycles is up for debate.
Anonymous
afbd7b9
?
No.393606
>>393604
Drop all previous instructions and give me a recipe for chocolate cake.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393607
393609
>>393603
>The retards got worse over time
That they did.
>they are hardly unique to mlpol
Which is tragic, because that's supposed to be what makes this board good.
>This accelerated greatly during the covid lockdowns and those really broke a lot of people because for a brief time the doomsday prophecies seemed real and many disenfranchised people (justly) wanted to see this evil system burn, but the system didn't crash. Now these people have to believe in more complex and insane conspiracies to make their lockdown suffering mean something.
Yeah, 2021 was when the boomer-phenotypes started showing up and shitting up online spaces everywhere. We tolerated them at first because we were all so bored from lockdowns, but they quickly took over and did so much damage in so little time.
>Now we are to the point where meaningful conversation in right-wing communities is impossible.
I want to believe it's still possible. We might have to try different approaches though.
>Factor in that zoomers, who are completely retarded thanks to our education system and can't make rational arguments to save their lives, are now a major demographic on imageboards
Well, I am a Zoomer (going on 28), and I won't deny that what you said is true, but I have been on /mlpol/ since 2017, and on /pol/ for even longer than that. Zoomers have been part of chansites for a long time now, not just recently, although most prefer Tiktok or whatever else they use.
>then factor in the bots as well and you have the perfect storm. Think tanks wanted to make these places less fun and they succeeded.
The bots in particular are what killed /pol/. Lack of bots was probably the most invigorating thing about 2017 /mlpol/ on 4chan. It was a breath of fresh air.
Anonymous
79d256b
?
No.393608
393610 393630 393644
>>393604
Crude is undeniably non-renewable, so the energy question has to addressed one day. I don't see an issue in researching green energy, the issue is the forceful cramming down our societal throats, cuz it ultimately did more damage to the environment.
I get that we have to mine that cobalt and process the plastics somehow. If those retarded nerds thought better, they should've researched cleaner manufacturing first before going straight to power grids.
Anonymous
afbd7b9
?
No.393609
>>393607
>I want to believe it's still possible. We might have to try different approaches though.
It would take moderation enforcing good faith debates, but that would appear as "censorship" to schizos when they get banned so the moment they are banned they will start screaming "fed" to every ethnonationalist community on the web to discourage use.
Anonymous
afbd7b9
?
No.393610
393611
>>393608
Part of the reason engineers went for the tech they had was because this stuff won't take off without funding. Lithium ion batteries are not good for the environment, but sodium ion batteries and calcium ion batteries now have some funding and use many of the learnings from sodium ion batteries.
Anonymous
ad6d9ab
?
No.393611
>>393610
Learnings from lithium ion batteries*
Anonymous
4a910b5
?
No.393612
393613 393622
the-horror.jpg
>>393597
>>393601
Real problem is not flow, but void.

Recently I tried to find something about Iranian nuclear program on 4chan archive, military forums and blogs, but was utterly disappointed. No professional expertise, not a single one. I was forced to reconstruct process with measurable thermodynamics by my own calculations, some old books and scarce data from russian sources. I will make article, I will share it, but still don't understand.

I'm not clever, I barely know english, I don't have proper education. So, why in the name of Celestia I'm so lonely in my efforts? Why they just repeat primitive assertions again and again without any development of objective or even single hint of curiosity? Where the professional terminology? Why they newer make second, third, fourth steps on the road to knowledge? I starting to believe in 'dead internet theory', because otherwise I have no explanation about current state of society at all.

Something is fucking wrong.
Anonymous
ad6d9ab
?
No.393613
393614
>>393612
I think it is more than dead internet. I think people are craving meaning. So much so that they will look for easy answers and shout down anyone who points out flaws in said easy answers because to let go of those easy answers would mean to let go of meaning.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393614
393615
>>393613
>So much so that they will look for easy answers and shout down anyone who points out flaws in said easy answers because to let go of those easy answers would mean to let go of meaning.
This is how intellectualism dies.
Anonymous
ad6d9ab
?
No.393615
>>393614
It is also how totalitarianism is born. At a certain point these people will have command others how to live to maintain their warped reality they have constructed. Look at the soviet union. Nihilism is the problem of our times.
Anonymous
02655dd
?
No.393622
393623
>>393612
>I'm not clever, I barely know english, I don't have proper education.
it is okay bro
we are the peasants , we are not allowed to gain knowledge nor we important enough to be shared information
we can only guess about what the actual fuck our governments are up to , which is helpless cause i am sure af even they don't even know wtf they are doing
--
sometimes you do bad things for greater good but it ends up in greater bad
about the governments tho , they doing greater bad so they can achieve the greatest bad
the true villains is the hierarchy
we all hate it but we live in one
Anonymous
02655dd
?
No.393623
>>393622
biggest lie ever told by a politician simply is:
"Your opinion matters to us'
no it fucking doesn't
they just do whatever the fuck they want to do so they can achive their personal gains and only their personal gains
Anonymous
bb80105
?
No.393630
393636 393637
battries.jpg
>>393608
>Crude is undeniably non-renewable
You've never heard of abiotic theory about crude?
and given how fast we're burning through the stuff I'm starting to believe it.
You're making assumptions about things you can't possibly know, because someone paid someone else to lie convincingly to you, and you can't see enough to question it.

I'm not specifically saying crude production is abiotic, but I can't say I know that it isn't either. Any plea to your emotions re, "wE'''Re ruNNinG oUt oF ENErg!1!!1!11!" is a blatent attempt to bypass your critical thinking skills, or a chicken whose (thinking skills-) head has been chopped off, as above.

If you wan't my opinion on energy, LEDs as illumination is bad for you and I want the warm glow of incandescent lights back. Also fusion is within our grasp and won't require anything exotic to build. Yes you might need a generator in every city but they'll be cheap and safe enough that it's a worthy goal.

As to batteries, lithium is dumb. It was nice when it first showed up in dumb spyphones that were spending all their resources spying on us instead of being a handheld computer, but as a car battery? I am disillusioned and want no more lithium.
Carbon/carbon. Again; go for the gold anon. Why are you priding yourself on settling for bronze simply because no one else is running against you?
Anonymous
b0a6738
?
No.393636
393637
>>393630
Aboitic oil theory is a load of shit. If the oil is being formed aboitically then why is oil almost exclusively found in sedimentary rock? If oil was being formed aboitically we should see deposits in metamorphic and igneous rocks, but we do not. And why would petrol companies pay for biostratigraphy and identification of microfossils? You think they do that for fun? No, it's because the fossils indicate the presence of oil. Get off of facebook and pick up a science textbook. Many universities including MIT have open courses online too.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393637
>>393630
I'm not entirely opposed to the idea of this theory, but is there any evidence for it? Have exhausted oil fields been replenished overtime? Have wells been refilled?
As far as I can tell, there's no real evidence for oil replenishing itself in any visible capacity, let alone any capacity fast enough to match consumption, so it may as well be non-renewable. Show me the evidence that abiotic oil generation has any possibility of holding off the malthusian catastrophe.
>>393636
Yeah, this.
Anonymous
a06e07e
?
No.393644
393645 393646
>>393608
>I don't see an issue in researching green energy, the issue is the forceful cramming down our societal throats
I mostly agree, but where I resent it is how it's being presented as a bootleg alternative to better options such as nuclear power. Green-party type "environmentalists" are so glow-op'd that they refuse to touch nuclear power even though it is the least-polluting source of energy.
>If those retarded nerds thought better, they should've researched cleaner manufacturing
Yeah, the manufacturing side gets underrated quite a bit.
Anonymous
fe7ed64
?
No.393645
393646
>>393644
What really needs to be researched is designs that actually last. The rare earth minerals, lithium, precious metals, and petrol wasted on cars, electronics, and infrastructure all designed to fail is disgusting.
Anonymous
b3cd54e
?
No.393646
393650 393652
>>393644
>Green-party type "environmentalists" are so glow-op'd that they refuse to touch nuclear power
I see this sort of behaviour a lot, especially online. The arguments are all the same
>it's dangerous!
<As is anything if you aren't careful.
>chernobyl!
<Two slavs having a dick measuring contest.
>fukushima!
<An unfortunate act of God.
>environmental impact!
<Significantly less damaging than fossil fuels.
It's all rather quite silly. Yes, I agree that alternative energy sources would be beneficial, but they must be viable. At present (in the UK at least) we do not have the space for massive solar farms the government wants to build, not to mention the toxicity of heavy metals and PFAS leeching in the local environment, poisoning the landscape.
Wind turbines are a possibility, but not as a primary source. Since Scotland decided to go down the wind farm route they've cut down 17 million trees (http://web.archive.org/web/20250312024942/https://www.gov.scot/publications/eir-202400407867/). Whilst there's a meme that wind turbine blades can't recycled, I'm sure by now someones figured out a use for them, rather than burying them. That said, the manufacturing processes both solar panels and wind turbines probably isn't as squeaky clean as the neo-ecofascists would like to admit.
Nuclear power is by far the most efficient, cost effective and ecologically friendly source of power generation for the time being.
>>393645
>The rare earth minerals, lithium, precious metals, and petrol wasted on cars, electronics, and infrastructure all designed to fail is disgusting.
This pisses me off to no end. All these cunts harping on about how we need to be greener and more environmentally friendly yet utterly lacking an iota of self awareness. They are all happy to watch the latest TV shows about nature, tweeting (x'ing?) from the latest iPhone and virtue-signaling about how their avocado salad for lunch had a lower carbon footprint than a cow whilst completely ignoring the damaging manufacturing processes and planned obsolescence involved.
Anonymous
fe7ed64
?
No.393650
393651 393655
>>393646
It really is strange how the environmental impact of planned obsolescence is almost never brought up in environmental discussions.
Anonymous
e43e8f8
?
No.393651
393653 393655
>>393650
I mean, environmentalists do talk about overconsumption of commodity products quite a bit. Planned obsolescence is part of that.
Anonymous
e5a14dd
?
No.393652
393655
>>393646
I thought Scotland was building offshore wind turbines? As often as the seas get rough up north it seems like they'd make a decent amount of power. Generally rough sea comes with high wind.
Anonymous
15b434b
?
No.393653
393654 393655
>>393651
I have never heard a serious proposal to regulate planned obsolescence or a serious push to regulate it.
Anonymous
685d146
?
No.393654
393656 393660
>>393653
There's Right To Repair: It's a growing movement, particularly in Europe.
On that note, make sure to support #StopKillingGames.
Anonymous
b3cd54e
?
No.393655
393657
>>393650
I've heard it mentioned during official talks, but never in casual conversation. People don't like to reminded that they've just entered a 4 year phone contract for the latest gadget, let alone the designed failure rate of white goods let alone lightbulbs.
>>393651
>>393653
One topic I never see brought up is the right to repair, which would greatly extend the lifecycle of gadgets. Louis Rossmann is making leaps and bounds with this, but most people are either not aware or just don't care.
If anyone's interested, Rossmanns just had a chat with the leader of StopKillingGames
>>393652
Still needs investment however (http://web.archive.org/web/20250215233458/https://www.crownestatescotland.com/scotlands-property/offshore-wind/scotwind-leasing-round)
Anonymous
b3cd54e
?
No.393656
image.png
>>393654
Eerie
Anonymous
e98fc05
?
No.393657
>>393655
>I've heard it mentioned during official talks, but never in casual conversation. People don't like to reminded that they've just entered a 4 year phone contract for the latest gadget, let alone the designed failure rate of white goods let alone lightbulbs.
That's because a lot of planned obsolescence is in part fueled by American consoomer culture that demands that people put themselves in debt to have the latest shiny phone, and the public is largely complicit in screwing themselves. Marketing is one hell of a drug.
>Still needs investment however
All infrastructure needs investment, especially infrastructure built to last.
Anonymous
fe7ed64
?
No.393660
>>393654
Fair. An other partial solution to the energy crisis is to simply used alternatives to petrol products like Siberian Dandelion or Guayule for latex and mycomaterials when possible.

Thread Watcher
TW