>>390048>When the orange jew does orange jew stuff, those remaining worshipers of him should have to, every time, explain why they continue to stand with him, and by extension of standing with him also stand with israelAt this point I think it's the other way around. I think the whiny, truculent doomer side of the right, that is always taking a shit on Trump regardless of what he says or does, is the side that's obligated to explain its position--in full, unobfuscated, non-symbolically driven detail, as you put it.
My support for Trump can be very easily summarized. This administration has accomplished more positive change, in the areas I care about, in its first 100 days than any other administration accomplished in its entirety in the 40-some-odd years I've been alive. Trump has not just followed through on his promise to deport illegals, he is attacking the roots of the problem, directly challenging birthright citizenship in court, and humanitarian justifications for admitting immigrants in general. He's not just deporting undesirables, he's staking out the position that America is a sovereign nation whose self interest comes before any ideological or "moral" obligations to the world, real or imagined. His approach to trade has been the same: he's upended relationships with our so-called "allies" and forced countries we do business with to either renegotiate on our terms or accept massive tariffs. On the domestic front he's dealt a massive bitch slap to affirmative action, DEI, and all the other lefty nonsense that's been plaguing our culture for the last decade. Other stuff he's done, like renaming the Gulf of Mexico and threatening to invade Canada and Greenland just for the lulz, didn't technically accomplish anything but has been hilarious to watch and good for morale. All of this is not even to mention shutting down USAID and DOGE's efforts to whittle down the size and scope of the government.
In short, since taking office, Trump has taken shots at literally every sacred cow the postwar establishment has: globalism, "free" trade, unchecked third-world immigration, open borders, CBDCs, DEI/"woke", the "rules-based democratic world order", bureaucracy, "human rights," and so forth. And yes, as an added bonus that others have mentioned, he has taken a much harder line against Netanyahu and Israel in general than previous Republican administrations have ever been bold enough to do, and likely a much harder line than Harris or Biden would ever have taken. This is why I support him.
As to the rest of this:
>He is having people arrested for opposing ZOGI'm assuming you're referring to the student protestors who are being put through the deportation process for staging pro-Palestine demonstrations. The important distinction here is that these people are not US citizens, they're foreigners here on student visas. A student visa is essentially a guest pass; the holder is
permitted to be in the US, he doesn't have a
right to be in the US. He also does not have the same rights and protections a citizen would have, so the First Amendment doesn't apply. Moreover, the support I've seen on the right for the pro-Palestine and Islamic left is beyond retarded in my view. Just because these people hate Israel does not mean they're "based." They don't hate Israel for the same reasons you hate Israel, and they hate Whites just as much as they hate Jews. These people are not our allies and you shouldn't sympathize with them. I don't care if the pretext for deporting them is "antisemitism" or unpaid parking tickets; we're better off without them and good riddance.
>Habeas CorpusAs was already pointed out by another anon, Trump is seeking to abolish Habeas Corpus for immigrants he wants to deport, not for citizens in general. The rationale is that the third-world migration wave into America is an invasion, and thus Trump as Commander in Chief can employ emergency wartime powers to remove them. One of these powers is the right to suspend Habeas Corpus, as other presidents have done in wartime. I agree with his reasoning.
>The democrats have admitted on several occasions that they don't even oppose anything he's done, their qualms are only that he isn't stealthy enough about itYeah, this is vague as all hell and sounds like bullshit. Gonna need some actual citations here.
>yet when his shills get called out they hide behind "b-b-but Q said" like we don't remember the Department Of Defence's hand in the whole Q thing.I'm not even going to dignify this with a response. Literally no one except online schizos and a handful of wacky redneck boomers give two shits about Q. Also, you misspelled "defense."
Okay chief, it's your turn now. Why exactly do you think ORANGE MAN BAD? Hard mode: justify your position without referencing kikes or Israel.