/mlpol/ - My Little Politics


If you want to see the latest posts from all boards in a convenient way please check out /overboard/
For Pony, Pony, Pony and Pony check out >>>/poner also Mares

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
6000
Select File / Oekaki
File(s)
No files selected
Password (For file and/or post deletion.)

17 replies |  7 files |  9 UUIDs |  Page 4
medium.png
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390048
390053 390057 390182 390189 390199
When the orange jew does orange jew stuff, those remaining worshipers of him should have to, every time, explain why they continue to stand with him, and by extension of standing with him also stand with israel. They should have to explain--in full, unobfuscated, non-symbolically driven detail--why they think that should still be an acceptable position to have in right wing spaces.
He is having people arrested for opposing ZOG, and seeking to abolish Habeas Corpus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habeas_corpus
The democrats have admitted on several occasions that they don't even oppose anything he's done, their qualms are only that he isn't stealthy enough about it. It is so brazen, yet when his shills get called out they hide behind "b-b-but Q said" like we don't remember the Department Of Defence's hand in the whole Q thing.
Anonymous
eab63bc
?
No.390053
390057 390068 390190
1747168789.webm (3.0 MB, Resolution:1280x1024 Length:00:00:07, Sugar_Belle_Big_Mac_Pho.webm) [play once] [loop]
Sugar_Belle_Big_Mac_Pho.webm
>>390048
>explain why they continue to stand with him, and by extension of standing with him also stand with israe
He's making unprecedented steps to decouple from Israel though. See >>389454 →
Also, people support him for other reasons. There are no better alternative candidates on the issue of Israel in America.
>why they think that should still be an acceptable position to have in right wing spaces
What does this even mean? Right Wing spaces like the Republican party?
>He is having people arrested for opposing ZOG
Elaborate.
>and seeking to abolish Habeas Corpus
He is considering SUSPENDING the writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of deporting illegal immigrant invaders. Suspension is not abolition.
>The democrats have admitted on several occasions that they don't even oppose anything he's done, their qualms are only that he isn't stealthy enough about it
[Citation needed]
>when his shills get called out they hide behind "b-b-but Q said"
Nobody says that here. Nobody gives a fuck about Q-boomers.
Anonymous
228ce50
?
No.390057
>>390053
You're far too kind
>>390048
>should have to, every time, explain why they continue to stand with him
You seem to think this is an islamic country where justification can be compelled
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390068
390073 390142 390190
3037445__explicit_cup+cake_female_pony_mare_nudity_male_earth+pony_smiling_looking+at+you_open+mouth_penis_butt_vulva_monochrome_tongue+out_anus_plot.jpg
>>390053
>He's making unprecedented steps to decouple from Israel though.
I'll believe it if it lasts.
>What does this even mean?
Just in general, they don't get pushback for shilling nearly as often as would seem reasonable, and I remember getting banned from 4chan years ago for very mild pushback. Try to find a right wing activitypub instance and it's a nest of them.
>Elaborate
https://www.npr.org/2025/02/06/nx-s1-5281179/trump-executive-order-aims-to-deport-international-students-who-have-protested-israel
>He is considering SUSPENDING the writ of habeas corpus for the purpose of deporting illegal immigrant invaders. Suspension is not abolition.
Just like the Patriot Act was a temporary measure to stop terrorism. Never trust ZOG to make a law they promise not to use, never trust ZOG to bring back a law that impedes them if they suspend it.
>Nobody says that here. Nobody gives a fuck about Q-boomers.
I've seen the occasional Qoomer here but yeah this place is pretty cozy in their general absence.
Anonymous
9df74ec
?
No.390073
390190
Cloudy_Quartz_Leggings_Over_Shoulder (1).png
>>390068
>shilling
I do not believe you know what "shilling" means. Trump supporters are not being paid to support him.
>I remember getting banned from 4chan years ago for very mild pushback
I have been using /pol/ since 2012, and I have never once heard of anyone being banned for criticizing Trump. The board is constantly full of anti-Trump spam. I do not believe you.
>link
Yeah, that's pretty fucking gay of him, but he's targeting foreign sandnigger lefties who shouldn't be in this country to begin with, so I don't care as much. It's still really gay though.
>Just like the Patriot Act was a temporary measure to stop terrorism. Never trust ZOG to make a law they promise not to use, never trust ZOG to bring back a law that impedes them if they suspend it.
He's not making a law though.
The president has always had the power to suspend the write of habeas corpus in a national emergency, and tens of millions of shitskins flooding into the country is an emergency. Democrats illegally let 20 million shitskins into the country and bypassed immigration processes, and now they're trying to say it's illegal to deport the shitskins who came here illegally because "muh due process". Deport them all.
Q-boomers aren't even really relevant anymore. You only see them in the corners of Facebook and Twitter.
>I've seen the occasional Qoomer
I have not seen any since 2017 when VrilAnon was posting it ironically.
Anonymous
000468c
?
No.390142
390178
>>390068
At least republican zogbots aren't advocating for the disarmamemt of Americans. (Yet)
Anonymous
dc941e8
?
No.390178
390190
eb4e9.jpg
>>390142
>republican zogbots
KEK, that's a good one.
The only zogbot that exist, is the pension zogbot. They are mercenaries after all.
Anonymous
8cd2993
?
No.390182
390187 390199 390205 390210
op.png
>>390048
>When the orange jew does orange jew stuff, those remaining worshipers of him should have to, every time, explain why they continue to stand with him, and by extension of standing with him also stand with israel
At this point I think it's the other way around. I think the whiny, truculent doomer side of the right, that is always taking a shit on Trump regardless of what he says or does, is the side that's obligated to explain its position--in full, unobfuscated, non-symbolically driven detail, as you put it.

My support for Trump can be very easily summarized. This administration has accomplished more positive change, in the areas I care about, in its first 100 days than any other administration accomplished in its entirety in the 40-some-odd years I've been alive. Trump has not just followed through on his promise to deport illegals, he is attacking the roots of the problem, directly challenging birthright citizenship in court, and humanitarian justifications for admitting immigrants in general. He's not just deporting undesirables, he's staking out the position that America is a sovereign nation whose self interest comes before any ideological or "moral" obligations to the world, real or imagined. His approach to trade has been the same: he's upended relationships with our so-called "allies" and forced countries we do business with to either renegotiate on our terms or accept massive tariffs. On the domestic front he's dealt a massive bitch slap to affirmative action, DEI, and all the other lefty nonsense that's been plaguing our culture for the last decade. Other stuff he's done, like renaming the Gulf of Mexico and threatening to invade Canada and Greenland just for the lulz, didn't technically accomplish anything but has been hilarious to watch and good for morale. All of this is not even to mention shutting down USAID and DOGE's efforts to whittle down the size and scope of the government.

In short, since taking office, Trump has taken shots at literally every sacred cow the postwar establishment has: globalism, "free" trade, unchecked third-world immigration, open borders, CBDCs, DEI/"woke", the "rules-based democratic world order", bureaucracy, "human rights," and so forth. And yes, as an added bonus that others have mentioned, he has taken a much harder line against Netanyahu and Israel in general than previous Republican administrations have ever been bold enough to do, and likely a much harder line than Harris or Biden would ever have taken. This is why I support him.

As to the rest of this:

>He is having people arrested for opposing ZOG
I'm assuming you're referring to the student protestors who are being put through the deportation process for staging pro-Palestine demonstrations. The important distinction here is that these people are not US citizens, they're foreigners here on student visas. A student visa is essentially a guest pass; the holder is permitted to be in the US, he doesn't have a right to be in the US. He also does not have the same rights and protections a citizen would have, so the First Amendment doesn't apply. Moreover, the support I've seen on the right for the pro-Palestine and Islamic left is beyond retarded in my view. Just because these people hate Israel does not mean they're "based." They don't hate Israel for the same reasons you hate Israel, and they hate Whites just as much as they hate Jews. These people are not our allies and you shouldn't sympathize with them. I don't care if the pretext for deporting them is "antisemitism" or unpaid parking tickets; we're better off without them and good riddance.

>Habeas Corpus
As was already pointed out by another anon, Trump is seeking to abolish Habeas Corpus for immigrants he wants to deport, not for citizens in general. The rationale is that the third-world migration wave into America is an invasion, and thus Trump as Commander in Chief can employ emergency wartime powers to remove them. One of these powers is the right to suspend Habeas Corpus, as other presidents have done in wartime. I agree with his reasoning.

>The democrats have admitted on several occasions that they don't even oppose anything he's done, their qualms are only that he isn't stealthy enough about it
Yeah, this is vague as all hell and sounds like bullshit. Gonna need some actual citations here.

>yet when his shills get called out they hide behind "b-b-but Q said" like we don't remember the Department Of Defence's hand in the whole Q thing.
I'm not even going to dignify this with a response. Literally no one except online schizos and a handful of wacky redneck boomers give two shits about Q. Also, you misspelled "defense."

Okay chief, it's your turn now. Why exactly do you think ORANGE MAN BAD? Hard mode: justify your position without referencing kikes or Israel.
Anonymous
9df74ec
?
No.390187
>>390182
>At this point I think it's the other way around. I think the whiny, truculent doomer side of the right, that is always taking a shit on Trump regardless of what he says or does, is the side that's obligated to explain its position--in full, unobfuscated, non-symbolically driven detail, as you put it.
This.
Groypers are always complaining, but they never offer reasonable alternatives.

I agree with the rest of your post too. Well said.
Anonymous
3e818db
?
No.390189
>>390048
it should be illegal to make the cackler cute
Anonymous
b85bae8
?
No.390190
>>390053
>>390068
>>390073
>>390178
Pardon me, but I'm just marking these }maremilfs{
Anonymous
8cd2993
?
No.390199
390207 390208
EN5xgREWkAArrwW.jpg
>>390048
>>390182
Oh, and also, literally just yesterday, Trump was in Qatar, publicly denouncing Neocon interventionism and "nation building":

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/trump-blasts-nation-builders-and-neocons-saudi-arabia-speech
https://www.fitsnews.com/2025/05/13/donald-trump-rips-neocons-in-saudi-speech/
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1922672385549033713 [Embed]

>President Donald Trump on Tuesday excoriated the past two decades of American nation building and neoconservative interventions, telling a crowd in Saudi Arabia, that the region's future lay with them.
>Trump’s speech on Tuesday (May 13, 2025) excoriated failed neoconservative “nation building” policies and instead promoted peace through “deal-making.”
>“I want to make a deal with Iran,” Trump added. “I can make a deal with Iran. I’ll be very happy if we’re going to make your region and the world a safer place.”
>"Far too many American presidents have been afflicted with the notion that it's our job to look into the souls of foreign leaders and use US policy to dispense justice for their sins ... It is God's job to sit in judgment — my job to defend America and to promote the fundamental interests of stability, prosperity, and peace."

He is currently cutting deals with both Saudi Arabia and Iran, in blatant defiance of the wishes of both the American Neocon establishment and Netanyahu. Can't wait to see what sort of mental gymnastics you come up with to explain how this is all just Zionist 4D chess.
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390205
390211
>>390182
>in the areas I care about
Given this bit specifically, fair. I might be being a news addict and focusing too much on what he does that I'm worried will wedge opportunities for future jewery that I don't give him the merit I'm sure he has earned. I work in cybersecurity so that mentality seeps into all things in life for me, especially politics. Honestly I couldn't made something allong the lines of the OP post for any president I've lived under, because they've all done shit that feels like their establishing a backdoor for later, or capitalizing on established backdoors.
The only things you list I'm really concerned about and support is immigration, not fucking around with geopolitics as much, and becoming more economically independent, The DEI stuff is just nothingburger culture war shit that'll get toggled back later, and if a policy is that easy to toggle I just ignore it as toggle issues are a distraction from economic issues at the root of it. i.e. why spend time toggling abortion off, just to have it toggle back on later, when you can address why people are so poor here that abortion seems like a reasonable out: the vast majority of the time not wanting kids is economic in nature. Same with the DEI stuff: people can't afford to make their own buisnesses, so they look to corpos for jobs. If you make people not dependent on being hired in the first place, then "diverse hiring" becomes a non-issue by extension of hiring itself ceasing to be an issue. DEI will be a toggle issue due to the failiure to address that.
>Other stuff he's done, like renaming the Gulf of Mexico and threatening to invade Canada and Greenland just for the lulz, didn't technically accomplish anything but has been hilarious to watch and good for morale.
I fully understand this is me being a stick in the mud, but the for the luls stuff just seems like busywork, and at my schizo-est makes me worry what ammo it gives think tanks and content farms. That is a vibes based qualm though and thus doesn't amount to much. Every president does that kinda stuff, like that time Obama rode in on a skateboard, and I'm sure I underestimate the importance it has to morale.
>USAID
Gonna be fully honest here: have no clue what USAID's significance has, just that seemingly everyone--left and right--celebrate it as cutting off shills somehow. I'll watch a video essay about
>DOGE
I can imagine something like DOGE having worked if someone that isn't zooted on coke while browsing twitter 24/7 was at the helm of it. He sliced a bunch of heads off a hydra with the conflict of interest of immediately saving his tesla stocks, and the heads that will grow back in their place will be even more horrifying. To scale down a government, you have to render an institution redundant by permanently addressing the issue that institution was, on the tin, meant to maintain a continuous solution for. Now we're going to fall behind the global competition in the sciences because Elon was put in charge of looking at descriptions of institutions and cutting them with excuses like "they have scientists looking at gecko feet" and it's gecko tape research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano_tape
So many institutions will come back with full control over their own red tape with what happened because of DOGE as an arguement for their importance.
>I'm assuming you're referring to the student protestors who are being put through the deportation process for staging pro-Palestine demonstrations.
Yeah I linked to the article I was specifically talking about. It is possible I'm overblowing the significance of it, but clearly an opportunity for israel-supporting institutions to comb through the options to widdle down specifically israel opposing people.
>They don't hate Israel for the same reasons you hate Israel,
I get that, but I don't see anything to assure me that line won't be crossed. Again, this is the cybersecurity part of my brain leeching into my politics. If something is functioning alright, it should still be in a container, because if it's not in a container and it starts to do unwanted things, you got pie on your face.
>Trump is seeking to abolish Habeas Corpus *for immigrants he wants to deport, not for citizens in general.*
Didn't catch that specific caveat. If such is on paper then I can rest easy on that, but I will have to check.
>I'm not even going to dignify this with a response. Literally no one except online schizos and a handful of wacky redneck boomers give two shits about Q.
Yeah someone already assured me about that, I still remember the days when that shit was everywhere though so I have a tendency to mentally overblow the examples I do find. If you've ever been in a car crash you get extra anxious near bad drivers, ya know?
>Also, you misspelled "defense."
English is such a gay and contrived language. I hope some conlang nerd strikes the holy grail "English but phonetic" some day.

So in all, I will try to look into the positive aspects of his administration so I won't be such a doomer about it, but I really think we should be skeptical about *how* he accomplishes things, what trap cards he's laying down. Critical support with emphasis on the critical part.
Anonymous
9df74ec
?
No.390207
>>390199
This was actually a very touching speech.
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390208
>>390199
Oh nice!
Been getting into using an RSS reader lately. May as well make a folder about him. If you have some feeds you reccomend for that I'd love to hear.
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390210
>>390182
Oh and:
>Yeah, this is vague as all hell and sounds like bullshit. Gonna need some actual citations here.
Full transparency: my source was a tiktok. One which cites a more direct source, but I'm not gonna pretend I just happened upon that source to preserve my dignity.
https://www.tiktok.com/@zero_woolfe/video/7500122218777660703
Anonymous
9df74ec
?
No.390211
390214
>>390205
>I might be being a news addict and focusing too much on what he does that I'm worried will wedge opportunities for future jewery that I don't give him the merit I'm sure he has earned
>I work in cybersecurity so that mentality seeps into all things in life for me, especially politics. Honestly I couldn't made something allong the lines of the OP post for any president I've lived under, because they've all done shit that feels like their establishing a backdoor for later, or capitalizing on established backdoors.
>this is me being a stick in the mud
>have no clue what USAID's significance has
>It is possible I'm overblowing the significance of it
>this is the cybersecurity part of my brain leeching into my politics
>I have a tendency to mentally overblow the examples I do find. If you've ever been in a car crash you get extra anxious near bad drivers, ya know?
>my source was a tiktok
The way you put it makes it sound like a personal problem, NGL.
You should try to look at things more objectively and practically, lest you fall down the groyper pipeline.
Anonymous
ff65229
?
No.390214
>>390211
Yeah I'm working on that, trying to get better at notetaking and such.
I remember hearing someone reccomend getting into writing and passing current events though OCs of various circumstances so there's a layer of detachment from it.

Thread Watcher
TW