Tonight at 9:00 PM EST, two prospective leaders will lock horns in a battle of wit, of mettle, of gumption. It's predicted that 70 million people will be watching, a third of which say that this debate could influence their decision in November. With polls tied, it could make or break the election.
STREAM LINKS:
NO COMMENTARY
>ABC (Host)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUVh2UjEKFY
>CSPAN Simulcast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAm5OCgZ6so&pp=ygUGYyBzcGFu
COMMENTARY
>Old Glory Club (Based chat)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdquHmqC9Ss
>Breaking Points
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaMlWRRzBPo
>Jimmy Dore
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYxhg2b57Sc
>Potentially Criminal (Based chat)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VTDPSTc7J4
>The Times (LEFT CHAT OPEN LMAO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHVd3j2u9yc
>Alex Jones/Infowars
https://banned.video/channel/the-alex-jones-show
>Nick Fuentes (No jews allowed)
https://rumble.com/v5eg5tv-presidential-debate-2-trump-vs-kamala.html
Get in here bros. Post mares.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
57 replies and 21 files omitted.
>>376764
First off, duh. Secondly, a qualified wrong.
To the frst, where do you think you are?
To the second, it is no worse than usual. Theres 1000 shill threads an 1-2 actual discussion thread. Business as usual.
First off, duh. Secondly, a qualified wrong.
To the frst, where do you think you are?
To the second, it is no worse than usual. Theres 1000 shill threads an 1-2 actual discussion thread. Business as usual.
Taylor Swift just endorsed Kamala. This might actually change the course of the election. Women are absolutely stupid enough to vote for Harris because Taylor Swift said so.
Just for the record. Project 2025 has been disavowed again by Donald J. Trump.
What an anti-white cuck.
What an anti-white cuck.
watched about 10 minutes of the debate, and had to turn it off. my gawd is koonmala a nasty lying ho. it's like she's everything bad about females all rolled into one toxically repulsive cunt.
File (): F4939D6D56AB988F1BD4BC2A408D622D-16309.jpg (15.9 KB, 250x250, 49804984s.jpg)
>>376768
>it's like she's everything bad about females all rolled into one toxically repulsive cunt.
She can't stop lying and twisting facts.
>it's like she's everything bad about females all rolled into one toxically repulsive cunt.
She can't stop lying and twisting facts.
File (): 10E44DAC68BFD023FC4AABD81D298AED-195250.png (190.7 KB, 640x360, aa1.png)
File (): 89EDEDD25BDB1E3D4A3D5930D8E5858C-152897.png (149.3 KB, 640x442, aa.png)
>NOVA H1 Audio Earrings are the first clip-on earphones on the planet. These Earrings are fully packed with the latest technology embedded in real pearls to provide you with music, phone calls and digital assistants all day long.
>Like conventional earrings, the NOVA H1 are placed on the earlobes and project the sound from inside the pearl straight into your ear canal.
>Thanks to our worldwide patented Directional Sound Technology, the sound travels from the earlobe to the ear canal avoiding sound leakage and keeping your conversations and music private and secure.
>Two tiny high-end microphones are integrated into each Earring providing the user with crystal clear phone calls and wind-noise cancellation.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/nova-audioearrings/audio-earrings-earphones-made-earrings
>Like conventional earrings, the NOVA H1 are placed on the earlobes and project the sound from inside the pearl straight into your ear canal.
>Thanks to our worldwide patented Directional Sound Technology, the sound travels from the earlobe to the ear canal avoiding sound leakage and keeping your conversations and music private and secure.
>Two tiny high-end microphones are integrated into each Earring providing the user with crystal clear phone calls and wind-noise cancellation.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/nova-audioearrings/audio-earrings-earphones-made-earrings
File (): F39FA474A8BC3A725B1A363CF7A71F38-166090.jpg (162.2 KB, 1280x640, a79sgref8.jpg)
File (): B31B9256C283028D1FCA3ABA555DAE96-84310.jpg (82.3 KB, 1080x1100, Screenshot_20240911_070445_Brave.jpg)
>>376778
>Afghanistan
Everything is so fake and gay.
The fairy tale is that the America Military left the country in a rush... for reasons. But there is much, much more of it.
Afghanistan has borders with Iran and Russia and suddenly the Taliban was gifted with an arsenal to support military operations for the decades to come.
A hint, the Taliban leadership was in prison in Qatar or Oman or one of those arab countries around, and Trump released them and flew them to Pakistan and from there the Talibosses got inside Afghanistan again; like they made a deal with the Americans who know to do what. Another hint, 2 months before the American military retreat, the money to pay the Afghan soldiers' salaries was stopped without warning by the Americans, that's why the Taliban took over the country almost without opposition. Another hint, there were videos posted by the same Taliban showing their amusement and pleasure of finding gifts consisting of """bales""" of brand new $100 dollar bills when they took over the cities, for the volume of packages it looked like the amount was in the tens of millions of may be way more.
But it is just another cohen-cidence.
>Afghanistan
Everything is so fake and gay.
The fairy tale is that the America Military left the country in a rush... for reasons. But there is much, much more of it.
Afghanistan has borders with Iran and Russia and suddenly the Taliban was gifted with an arsenal to support military operations for the decades to come.
A hint, the Taliban leadership was in prison in Qatar or Oman or one of those arab countries around, and Trump released them and flew them to Pakistan and from there the Talibosses got inside Afghanistan again; like they made a deal with the Americans who know to do what. Another hint, 2 months before the American military retreat, the money to pay the Afghan soldiers' salaries was stopped without warning by the Americans, that's why the Taliban took over the country almost without opposition. Another hint, there were videos posted by the same Taliban showing their amusement and pleasure of finding gifts consisting of """bales""" of brand new $100 dollar bills when they took over the cities, for the volume of packages it looked like the amount was in the tens of millions of may be way more.
But it is just another cohen-cidence.
>>376780
The video with the money was posted here at the time of the American retreat. The rest you may dig sites like The Intercept and similar ones. Also you may check a map for Afghanistan's borders. And if that is not at your satisfaction, the meme might be the proper answer.
The video with the money was posted here at the time of the American retreat. The rest you may dig sites like The Intercept and similar ones. Also you may check a map for Afghanistan's borders. And if that is not at your satisfaction, the meme might be the proper answer.
>>376779
>The fairy tale is that the America Military left the country in a rush...
We left in just a few months. That's a rush.
>for reasons
The reason was that it was an unwinnable war trying to turn Afghanistan into anything but a shithole.
>suddenly the Taliban was gifted with an arsenal to support military operations for the decades to come
That's because glowniggers explicitly armed them with intent of making them fight the Soviet Union.
>Taliban leadership was in prison in Qatar or Oman or one of those arab countries around, and Trump released them and flew them to Pakistan and from there the Talibosses got inside Afghanistan again; like they made a deal with the Americans who know to do what
That was part of the deal, yeah.
>2 months before the American military retreat, the money to pay the Afghan soldiers' salaries was stopped without warning by the Americans, that's why the Taliban took over the country almost without opposition
The Afghan government fell because it wasn't a real government in the first place: it was a house of cards, a corrupt kleptocracy hated by the locals and was only able to exist because Americans were propping it up for 20 years with no actual foundation or civil society other than furthering American military interests. It was obvious that it was going to collapse as soon as Americans pulled out; Biden just didn't predict how quickly it would collapse (because glowniggers actually began to believe their own propaganda that the fake Afghan government was a robust beacon of democracy that the Afghans had faith in).
>there were videos posted by the same Taliban showing their amusement and pleasure of finding gifts consisting of """bales""" of brand new $100 dollar bills when they took over the cities, for the volume of packages it looked like the amount was in the tens of millions of may be way more
This was a combination of the Taliban finding hidden caches of the ex-kleptocrats' money laundering hordes, and also glowniggers leaving them money to build a country and thus prevent further chaos from spiralling out of control and spreading to neighboring regions: It's like how after the Korean War Americans dropped off shiploads of rice to North Korea one winter to prevent them from attacking South Korea out of desperation; hungry people are unpredictable.
>But it is just another cohen-cidence.
None of it is a coincidence. It was a series of embarrassing failures and haphazard attempts to put Band-Aids on those failures.
>The fairy tale is that the America Military left the country in a rush...
We left in just a few months. That's a rush.
>for reasons
The reason was that it was an unwinnable war trying to turn Afghanistan into anything but a shithole.
>suddenly the Taliban was gifted with an arsenal to support military operations for the decades to come
That's because glowniggers explicitly armed them with intent of making them fight the Soviet Union.
>Taliban leadership was in prison in Qatar or Oman or one of those arab countries around, and Trump released them and flew them to Pakistan and from there the Talibosses got inside Afghanistan again; like they made a deal with the Americans who know to do what
That was part of the deal, yeah.
>2 months before the American military retreat, the money to pay the Afghan soldiers' salaries was stopped without warning by the Americans, that's why the Taliban took over the country almost without opposition
The Afghan government fell because it wasn't a real government in the first place: it was a house of cards, a corrupt kleptocracy hated by the locals and was only able to exist because Americans were propping it up for 20 years with no actual foundation or civil society other than furthering American military interests. It was obvious that it was going to collapse as soon as Americans pulled out; Biden just didn't predict how quickly it would collapse (because glowniggers actually began to believe their own propaganda that the fake Afghan government was a robust beacon of democracy that the Afghans had faith in).
>there were videos posted by the same Taliban showing their amusement and pleasure of finding gifts consisting of """bales""" of brand new $100 dollar bills when they took over the cities, for the volume of packages it looked like the amount was in the tens of millions of may be way more
This was a combination of the Taliban finding hidden caches of the ex-kleptocrats' money laundering hordes, and also glowniggers leaving them money to build a country and thus prevent further chaos from spiralling out of control and spreading to neighboring regions: It's like how after the Korean War Americans dropped off shiploads of rice to North Korea one winter to prevent them from attacking South Korea out of desperation; hungry people are unpredictable.
>But it is just another cohen-cidence.
None of it is a coincidence. It was a series of embarrassing failures and haphazard attempts to put Band-Aids on those failures.
>>376781
Without saying your information/summary is inaccurate (idfk), these are interesting/curious allegations. Aside from indicating that Afghanistan borders Iran and Russia, how does consulting a map support your claims.
And while I attempt to find a source for your claims, do you appreciate that:
A. this whole "trust me bro" practice of discussion has gotten out of hand
B. in that its been 3 years since, trying to find specific sources based on your less-than-specific/concise description is a dubious proposition.
The way your response is phrased suggests that if I don't find citations for your claims, it's somehow my fault. Without assuming that's the actual subtext, you should be aware of the appearance.
Without saying your information/summary is inaccurate (idfk), these are interesting/curious allegations. Aside from indicating that Afghanistan borders Iran and Russia, how does consulting a map support your claims.
And while I attempt to find a source for your claims, do you appreciate that:
A. this whole "trust me bro" practice of discussion has gotten out of hand
B. in that its been 3 years since, trying to find specific sources based on your less-than-specific/concise description is a dubious proposition.
The way your response is phrased suggests that if I don't find citations for your claims, it's somehow my fault. Without assuming that's the actual subtext, you should be aware of the appearance.
>>376781
>The rest you may dig sites
You know, when people ask you for citations, it's not because they can't look it up themselves. People ask you for citations because they want to read the same material that (You) read, and understand how you came to that conclusion.
If you're interested in Anons taking you seriously, maybe consider that.
>The rest you may dig sites
You know, when people ask you for citations, it's not because they can't look it up themselves. People ask you for citations because they want to read the same material that (You) read, and understand how you came to that conclusion.
If you're interested in Anons taking you seriously, maybe consider that.
File (): 429096A615F672CEBBCE4084692E3036-27707.jpg (27.1 KB, 736x736, 20240909_013155.jpg)
>>376783
>A. this whole "trust me bro" practice of discussion has gotten out of hand
It's just one of two posters here, one of which was the boomer who finally got banned for being a massive nigger. I wouldn't be surprised if he's still ban-evading here.
>A. this whole "trust me bro" practice of discussion has gotten out of hand
It's just one of two posters here, one of which was the boomer who finally got banned for being a massive nigger. I wouldn't be surprised if he's still ban-evading here.
File (): C7E1E7A60BC70A19CB2EE94A27930131-241476.png (235.8 KB, 894x894, my_little_pony__pocket_ponies_by_raiokai_dddwbpd-pre-3227416423.png)
File (): 7D51722463E80C3583594CB68C4F5A0B-133695.gif (130.6 KB, 535x635, 1650972570414.gif)
File (): 84C3FA5288977DF0BC6F7389D6F3475B-530668.png (518.2 KB, 1176x1094, 1726054755046022.png)
>>376762
So apparently, Harris wants another debate. I didn't expect this, since a lot of the media were saying this would be the only debate.
Harris did a lot better in this debate than I expected. I wonder if she'll do as well in the next one.
Trump underperformed, imo. He did much better in the past debate with Biden. He seems to be coping that he won, but if he knows what's good for him he'll change tunes in the next debate; maybe actually prepare and rehearse.
So apparently, Harris wants another debate. I didn't expect this, since a lot of the media were saying this would be the only debate.
Harris did a lot better in this debate than I expected. I wonder if she'll do as well in the next one.
Trump underperformed, imo. He did much better in the past debate with Biden. He seems to be coping that he won, but if he knows what's good for him he'll change tunes in the next debate; maybe actually prepare and rehearse.
>>376767
Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025 in the first place. Trump doesn't let the Heritage Foundation dictate his entire presidential agenda.
>What an anti-white cuck.
What, you was he supposed to lay claim to a project he didn't even read, let alone write? What did you expect him to do? It's literally not his project. He was dispelling liberal fear mongering over a project that wasn't his in the first place.
You sound as ridiculous as Nick Fuentes making a big deal over this.
>has been disavowed
He said some of the ideas were good, some of them bad. The point is that it wasn't his project.
Trump never had anything to do with Project 2025 in the first place. Trump doesn't let the Heritage Foundation dictate his entire presidential agenda.
>What an anti-white cuck.
What, you was he supposed to lay claim to a project he didn't even read, let alone write? What did you expect him to do? It's literally not his project. He was dispelling liberal fear mongering over a project that wasn't his in the first place.
You sound as ridiculous as Nick Fuentes making a big deal over this.
>has been disavowed
He said some of the ideas were good, some of them bad. The point is that it wasn't his project.
File (): 2BD9396A1DE67577E8D3804ADAF76A7A-343310.mp4 (335.3 KB, Resolution:720x720 Length:00:00:10, video_2024-09-11_14-30-26.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>376788
He was really debating the moderators more than Harris, which is good for her since it meant she spoke less, and she really benefits from shutting the fuck up.
He was really debating the moderators more than Harris, which is good for her since it meant she spoke less, and she really benefits from shutting the fuck up.
>>376790
>You sound as ridiculous as Nick Fuentes making a big deal over this.
>ridiculous
Actually Fuentes' posture is the only one that makes sense and shows him as the only adult in the room.
Like it or not, or you are Pro-White or you are anti-white, there is not middle stance.
>You sound as ridiculous as Nick Fuentes making a big deal over this.
>ridiculous
Actually Fuentes' posture is the only one that makes sense and shows him as the only adult in the room.
Like it or not, or you are Pro-White or you are anti-white, there is not middle stance.
>>376834
>you are Pro-White or you are anti-white
Project 2025 is not "pro-white". It's just Conservative.
>you are Pro-White or you are anti-white
Project 2025 is not "pro-white". It's just Conservative.
File (): C56A473D74C933D570CE1C87D059ACDC-245809.png (240.0 KB, 1406x1406, smugrumble.png)
File (): F98F1696AE0E712191D472CC411D0C92-87943.jpg (85.9 KB, 720x514, 1726274608084165.jpg)
File (): AFEE291AC2C15BB0EE81AE79A2D06DE3-9342659.mp4 (8.9 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:01:58, GROYPER WAR II CHAPTER I LOYALTY.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>376837
>Project 2025 is not "pro-white". It's just Conservative.
Project 2025 is way more than conservative as it draws a whole reshuffle of the government replacing the multi-generational parasitical caste with /our_guys/.
And because Trump wants to inject Conservative Inc. operatives instead, Groyper War 2 is coming. It is the Groypers' Way or the highway for the GOP.
>Project 2025 is not "pro-white". It's just Conservative.
Project 2025 is way more than conservative as it draws a whole reshuffle of the government replacing the multi-generational parasitical caste with /our_guys/.
And because Trump wants to inject Conservative Inc. operatives instead, Groyper War 2 is coming. It is the Groypers' Way or the highway for the GOP.
Shit's so fucked that it's preferrable to revert to 90s progressivism. Not ideal, but since one side loves their country too much to hurt it and the other is literally satanic and evil, better than nothing. Such is life.
>>376891
Please pardon. Ordinarily it could be considered abusive to approach a response as I'm about to, but when observing a specific poster increasingly argue unsubstantiated nonsense, one is left wih little choice
These groypers who are going to be dictating to the GOP, are they in the room wih you right now?
Please pardon. Ordinarily it could be considered abusive to approach a response as I'm about to, but when observing a specific poster increasingly argue unsubstantiated nonsense, one is left wih little choice
These groypers who are going to be dictating to the GOP, are they in the room wih you right now?
>>376895
>but when observing a specific poster increasingly argue unsubstantiated nonsense
Not quite.
Pardon me for not displaying Fuentes' plan in this board, but suffice to say that Minnesota can be flipped for just 10K votes.
>but when observing a specific poster increasingly argue unsubstantiated nonsense
Not quite.
Pardon me for not displaying Fuentes' plan in this board, but suffice to say that Minnesota can be flipped for just 10K votes.
>376891
>Actually posting Fuentes
>Actually posting Fuentes
>>376898
Fuentes is a fucking clown, and groypers are a minority within a minority who have zero presence or relevance outside of the internet. It’s beyond silly to suggest that they’re going to somehow take over the GOP despite the average Republican voter probably not even knowing what a groyper is.
Fuentes is a fucking clown, and groypers are a minority within a minority who have zero presence or relevance outside of the internet. It’s beyond silly to suggest that they’re going to somehow take over the GOP despite the average Republican voter probably not even knowing what a groyper is.
>376898
>Pardon me for not displaying Fuentes' plan in this board
Don't. We banned eceleb-worshipping trannies from this board back in 2017 for a reason, with the likes of Fuentes in mind.
>Pardon me for not displaying Fuentes' plan in this board
Don't. We banned eceleb-worshipping trannies from this board back in 2017 for a reason, with the likes of Fuentes in mind.
>>376902
This. Fuentes i ridiculously easy to discredit, especially to an audience of normies.
In all likelihood, if he (ahem) "and the groypers" insert 'nanna nanna boo boo' technique
try, it will probably end up having a reverse-psychological effect
This. Fuentes i ridiculously easy to discredit, especially to an audience of normies.
In all likelihood, if he (ahem) "and the groypers" insert 'nanna nanna boo boo' technique
try, it will probably end up having a reverse-psychological effect
>>376902
"Groypers" like Fuentes don't actually plan to take over the GOP. Fuentes just wants Republicans to lose and life to get worse for Americans, so he can continue to make a career out of complaining about everything to his followers while contributing nothing to society. Trump should have never bumped that asshole by having dinner with him.
All political ecelebs should be ground up into Soylent Green and fed to Haitians. Left, right, center, they're all cancerous grifters.
"Groypers" like Fuentes don't actually plan to take over the GOP. Fuentes just wants Republicans to lose and life to get worse for Americans, so he can continue to make a career out of complaining about everything to his followers while contributing nothing to society. Trump should have never bumped that asshole by having dinner with him.
All political ecelebs should be ground up into Soylent Green and fed to Haitians. Left, right, center, they're all cancerous grifters.
>>376907
Damn shame, some of these ecelebs had a veneer of sanity to them. I never really heard about this Fuentes faggot, just that he was at least sort of bog standard for a political tuber, at least until he went all accelerationist or some shit.
Damn shame, some of these ecelebs had a veneer of sanity to them. I never really heard about this Fuentes faggot, just that he was at least sort of bog standard for a political tuber, at least until he went all accelerationist or some shit.
>>376895
>>376902
I think the point is that Trump's hiring people who were either incompetent, or completely hostile towards him on his first term, which is true. According to Fuentes, Project 2025 would have allowed to hire "half-decent" people, who would've been much better than what Trump picked. Not so sure about that, but that's what he's saying.
Yes, Fuentes said he and his groypers supposedly infiltrated the GOP. But that was all the way back in 2019. I don't think he's offering a "solution" anymore.
>>376902
I think the point is that Trump's hiring people who were either incompetent, or completely hostile towards him on his first term, which is true. According to Fuentes, Project 2025 would have allowed to hire "half-decent" people, who would've been much better than what Trump picked. Not so sure about that, but that's what he's saying.
Yes, Fuentes said he and his groypers supposedly infiltrated the GOP. But that was all the way back in 2019. I don't think he's offering a "solution" anymore.
>>376915
This man is literally one bad day from becoming a terrorist. I refuse to associate with that, sorry mate.
This man is literally one bad day from becoming a terrorist. I refuse to associate with that, sorry mate.
>>376916
He's a tranny-chasing, homosexual, la creatura spic-oid trying to make everyone's life worse so he can complain about it.
It's sad to see ecelebfags on /mlpol/. I thought we created this community in part to escape that faggotry.
He's a tranny-chasing, homosexual, la creatura spic-oid trying to make everyone's life worse so he can complain about it.
It's sad to see ecelebfags on /mlpol/. I thought we created this community in part to escape that faggotry.
File (): F4FCB1846E5E9CB78D01428A9846E211-331845.png (324.1 KB, 586x825, image-218.png)
>376915
>>376916
He was going to "destroy the GOP" back in 2021. He won't do shit. My guess is he's desperate to get a sponsor out of the elections.
I don't really think Trump will deliver in anything. Perhaps they'll cut down on immigration for a while. Just long enough so the attitude towards immigration improves a bit.
He was going to "destroy the GOP" back in 2021. He won't do shit. My guess is he's desperate to get a sponsor out of the elections.
I don't really think Trump will deliver in anything. Perhaps they'll cut down on immigration for a while. Just long enough so the attitude towards immigration improves a bit.
File (): 60578ECC201060C2F9B6204682383876-70299.jpg (68.7 KB, 752x1063, DA6360D4657C68E8E7FC87C5C8A2A603-70281.jpg)
>>376925
>>376926
Alright, was lazy enough to listen to his project 2025 stream. There's some interesting stuff.
Nick has admitted Trump's victory is "probably" unavoidable. He said his "plan", where he would "do something" in battleground states, will not work because Trump's support is just too strong now.
He also said groypers should not distance from Trump, otherwise they'll be left out completely and will look like losers if he wins by a landslide. All in all, seems like he's back to reality for the moment.
There's another stream, but I'm not watching more of this shit.
>>376926
Alright, was lazy enough to listen to his project 2025 stream. There's some interesting stuff.
Nick has admitted Trump's victory is "probably" unavoidable. He said his "plan", where he would "do something" in battleground states, will not work because Trump's support is just too strong now.
He also said groypers should not distance from Trump, otherwise they'll be left out completely and will look like losers if he wins by a landslide. All in all, seems like he's back to reality for the moment.
There's another stream, but I'm not watching more of this shit.
File (): D639937D7848DBDF5F798285E39F8A1D-1564999.png (1.5 MB, 1162x2087, 1726497227892313.png)
If you fucks are done arguing about ecelebs, some actual relevant news to this thread just dropped:
>A whistleblower at ABC has sworn under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign colluded with ABC News to craft the debate to her liking and even received questions ahead of time.
>The whistleblower, a 10-year veteran of the outlet, testified in a 6-page affidavit released Sunday that ABC News and other major news organizations “no longer adhere to impartiality” and warned that the debate would demonstrate more anti-Trump bias.
>"It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny," whistleblower states in affidavit.
>ABC News also assured Harris campaign she wouldn't receive "questions regarding the perceived health of Joe Biden" or "inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco."
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835358499548602666
>A whistleblower at ABC has sworn under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign colluded with ABC News to craft the debate to her liking and even received questions ahead of time.
>The whistleblower, a 10-year veteran of the outlet, testified in a 6-page affidavit released Sunday that ABC News and other major news organizations “no longer adhere to impartiality” and warned that the debate would demonstrate more anti-Trump bias.
>"It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not face comparable scrutiny," whistleblower states in affidavit.
>ABC News also assured Harris campaign she wouldn't receive "questions regarding the perceived health of Joe Biden" or "inquiries related to her tenure as Attorney General in San Francisco."
https://x.com/DocNetyoutube/status/1835358499548602666
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-107] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
107 replies | 42 files | 28 UUIDs | Page 8