/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

>>376688
Sorry, all I'm seeing is "Bla bla, TRUST ME BRO"

I'll follow up really quick.
Too many people are biased to assume that their disbelief of something is equivocable to invalidating evidence.
>This is /mlpol/, right?
>Would you mind to stop being a normie and think like an anon instead? Damn!
You couldn't invalidate your position more if you tried

>>376690
You are the living proof why influencers are hired; you only accept input from them while shutting your critical mind down.
Another issue here is that noponer is calling you out for your NPC attitude. I guess you all are bots. So be it then.

>>376692
So, are you admitting that when pressed, you're UNABLE to present anything beyond your disbelief as evidence of your certainty?
How npc of me.
Ive acknowledged a whole swath of possibilities, and am begging the question. Where does your certainty come from?

>>376693
>Where does your certainty come from?
It goes both ways fren. Ask that same question yourself.

>>376694
Not ur fren, chief
Im NOT certain! You'd have to be an idiot to do any more than attempt to assess a threshold of possibility!
And then there's (you) who's mind is already made up. Again, clearly Im the npc

>>376695
Myself arguing with an AI.

Character assassination and straw Manning? How did I get so lucky?!

>>376688
>just trust me bro
So you made it up?
Why should I believe you if you're not willing to back it up.
I didn't ask for a source, I asked for evidence.
>>376691
He thinks /mlpol/ is as stupid as whatever Facebook group he gets this garbage from.
>>376692
Nobody gives a shit about influencers.

>>376698
>He thinks /mlpol/ is as stupid as whatever Facebook group he gets this garbage from.
Agreed. It's a small consolation, but Im fine continuing the argument to allow him to continue to reveal his (ahem) totally-not-triple-paranthetical agenda.