/mlpol/ - My Little Politics

some liberal seething
https://mastodon.laurenweinstein.org/@lauren/112793448479415181
>All the individual political issues that most people care about here on #Mastodon -- minority group rights, Gaza, law enforcement, immigration, on and on -- every single one will be many orders of magnitude worse under a Trump/Vance administration, and you can bet Vance will NEVER certify a Democratic winner of the 2028 election if he's the VP. There will be concentration camps for immigrants, military forces deployed in cities to stamp out protests, and destruction of civil rights (especially of women and minorities) on a magnitude that has never before been seen in the history of this country. Make sure your relatives and friends and associates understand what is at stake, because they have one and only one chance to put aside their individual issues disagreements and to save their liberties, and that's THIS election. Lose that to Trump/Vance, and all the other issues will be crushed to dust under fascist boots.

>#ElonMusk is on the Trump train. $45 million per month to a pro-Trump super PAC (Musk lies and exagggerates a ton, though). He wants those tax cuts, federal subsidies, loose regulations, and to punch down from his billionaire perch.

>@lauren get organized redwine.blue/project2025
not sure what that link is about, haven't looked, might be interesting to help see what goes on in their little zogbot peabrain

According to Democrats, he's a maniac who will chip up Jewish grandmas to make lampshades and soap out of them, while he forces women into slave pens to be broodmares having child after child, sterilize all niggers, and make it legal to hunt troons for sport using government-subsidized legal machine guns and RPGs.
Based on this, I have concluded that he cannot be that bad.
https://fixupx.com/USJewishDems/status/1812929220370157999?t=JBP5fem6Znqbbex1PU_YYQ&s=19
https://fixupx.com/USJewishDems/status/1812929220370157999?t=JBP5fem6Znqbbex1PU_YYQ&s=19

>>374764
the fact checkers are whurring too

>>374757
The point is that so long as boomers remain the largest voting bloc (realistically another 10-20 years minimum) you will never see a mainstream candidate from either party who is willing to defy the Israel lobby. In the meantime, however, some choices are objectively better than others.

>>374763
Trump is anti-2nd/4th Amendment. He was a strict commiecrat for most of his life before 'switching party'. Vance looks to be about the same.

>>374799
>'switching party'
Are you implying that he's still a Democrat?
Democrats definitely don't think of him as such.
>Vance looks to be about the same.
Vance was never a Democrat. His political career has been short, because unusually young for a VP (first millennial VP).

>>374801
Absolutely. Trump was groomed to be controlled opposition from birth. He took up stage acting as the goodest goyim. Malta lineage. Look it up.

>>374806
The only Democrat policy I can really think of is the bump stock ban, which was eventually thrown out by the court justices that he appointed.
The rest of the things on that list are just general incompetence.

>>374806
Also, most of the stuff on this list is just regular Republicuck stuff, not Democratic stuff.

>>374807
No matter if it comes from republicucks or commiecrats, planned espionage is not "incompetence".

>>374809
Idk what to say then. Trump isn't perfect, but my life was a lot better under him than it is under Biden, so I strongly prefer him.

This thread is about Vance though. Let's keep the conversation about him.

>>374810
Check the track records of all prior (((vice presidents))), specifically which conflicts they aided in creating.

An emperor/empress rules an empire.
A king/queen rules a kingdom...
But a vice president co-rules a corporation.

>>374811
Okay, so what about Vance in particular?
Who would you have preferred?

Vance wants to kill the ATF

>>374811
Nice dubs

>>374812
#1: sketchy family history. His book is a poor joke.
#2: laughable military service. First a [combat correspondent], then [Public Affairs]? Giant red flag, those are cushy political bootlicker jobs.
#3: [Bachelor of Arts in political science and philosophy] from Ohio State University, which is held by corpo-commies. Two massive red flags there.
#4: Yale Law School. Giant blue check mark? Check.
#5: he worked for Sidley Austin LLC, a thoroughly kiked "international law firm". Same one that Mike and bitchboi O'bawwma were in. More than enough said.
#6: his nonprofit, Our Ohio Renewal, was a complete sham. Raked in petro-shekels to spend on everything except poor people. Political ties to #5 got him in deep with [Purdue Pharmaceuticals] and the [American Enterprise Institute]. Even bigger red flags there.
#7: joined [Revolution LLC], an "investment firm", created by AOL's founder, whom you might know as one of the biggest nu-socialism supporters.
#8: strongly supported PPP loans in 2020 through republicuck PACs using his ties through #5.
#9: East Palestine, Ohio train derailment. He 'agreed' with the consensus of blowing the tankers out and burning the chemicals, which produced massive amounts of phosgene.

tl;dr: he's nothing more than another Crenshaw. There is no (((good))) vice presididn't.

>>374828
>His book is a poor joke
Fair point. It was nothing special.
>those are cushy political bootlicker jobs
They're administrative/communication positions. Does that really make him less qualified to be an administrator?
>political science
Polisci major goes into politics. Big surprise.
>corpo-commies
What is a "corpo-commie"?
>Giant blue check mark?
They give blue checkmarks to all public figures.
>a thoroughly kiked "international law firm"
All law firms are kiked, in case you didn't notice.
>Raked in petro-shekels to spend on everything except poor people
Elaborate. What was it spent on?
>you might know as one of the biggest nu-socialism supporters
They're capitalist as they come.
>strongly supported PPP loans in 2020 through republicuck PACs using his ties through #5.
Those were incredibly popular though.
>He 'agreed' with the consensus of blowing the tankers out and burning the chemicals, which produced massive amounts of phosgene.
He was a Senator, not the governor, so his opinion on the matter wasn't really significant.
I'm not really qualified to talk about the proper way to deal with chemical spills though. Maybe burning them was a mistake.
>There is no (((good))) vice presididn't.
So what you're saying is that he's no worse than anyone else Trump could have picked?
Why is "good" in Jew brackets? Jews aren't good, and all the candidates are very much good goys so your statement makes no sense.

>>374829
so you didn't disagree with any of his points, but your point seems to be "well there's nobody else in the country better suited to the job"
nigger I'm better suited to the job because my wife isn't one of the subhumans invading the continent at every level

>>374841
alright, fine, I'll bite. what type of subhuman is your wife, then?

My country sucks because we have people in power who tolerate streetshitter hindus. I don't want to bring you guys down, but for a White man like Vance to procreate with a Jeetette is evidence of some underlying self-harm fetish. He's smart, genetically sound, comes from a responsible family, and has a background of high-trust, high-profile positions. He could have had any nice rural White GF but he went out of his way to find the Indian curry that's probably never even tasted a steak. Here's hoping she goes the usual route of divorcing him as soon as he gets that first VP check.
>>374829
>They're administrative/communication positions. Does that really make him less qualified to be an administrator?
Ideally, only men who have survived been shot at by their enemies should oversee anything related to national defense.

Perhaps the war in Ukraine might end soon

>>374829
#2: Administration = political bureaucracy. Bean counters are inefficient at best, treacherous at worse. A cushy job with zero stress, minimal expectations, and lackluster performance with no reviews?
#4: corporate-oligarchic judeo-communism has (((7))) levels. Different from britcuck corporate-oligarchy: ultra-rich -> rich -> everyone else.
#7: mostly right back into Our Ohio Renewal via nepotism. Shekels come in, shekels float around via bribes and sweetheart deals, shekels come in. Nothing, or little, was done to aid the people of Ohio.
#8: capitalism and socialism is one face on the same coin viewed from slightly different angles.

Much worse. A centrist conservacuck with deep ties to international kikes, the MIC, and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. In short, he's a traitor.
Sarcasm.

>>374989
>#4: corporate-oligarchic judeo-communism has (((7))) levels. Different from britcuck corporate-oligarchy: ultra-rich -> rich -> everyone else.
That's cronyism, not communism. Communists are a different breed of tyranny.
>#8: capitalism and socialism is one face on the same coin viewed from slightly different angles.
No, it's really not.
I economically consider myself to be fascist/NatSoc, which is critical of both socialism and capitalism, but they are not the same thing.

>>374741
JD Vance is a plant by a Literal Murder-Faggot named Peter Thiel.

The dude is an actual faggot and murders his faggoty-boyfriends for fun. if anyone needs digging-on, it's him.

>>374992
Same precise end result. Slightly different beginning, methods, and means. Your point?

Same precise end result, again.

>374998
>this level of political and economic literacy
I expected more from /mlpol/.

Liberals are seething over Vance posting a few cat memes, and calling it "4chanification"

I strongly suspect Vance will soon be out as Trump’s VP, and will presumably be replaced by RFK Jr.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2024/09/05/rfk-jr-to-campaign-in-battleground-states-n2644355

>>376672
I don't believe it. It's too late for that.

>>376673
Why do you think that? To me it just looks like Trump is consolidating as many of the small parties as possible.

>>376673
sorry, was meant for >>376672

The board is moving too fast!

>>376673
You've got a point.
That said, I will make my **prediction-opinion-wildguess-internalinfo** supported by nothing but aether:
Trump will not be president and a transition stooge will take over temporally, it may be the Speaker or the House.

>>376676
>Trump will not be president and a transition stooge will take over temporally
I think they gave up on that plan after the failed assassination. If they're planning something nefarious, they're better off waiting for the end of Trump's second term.

>>376677
>failed assassination
Ahem. A too obvious staged incident I would say.
No government bodyguard is in prison for being accessory in a conspiracy to commit murder.
No local police came forward to even save face.
Hundreds of spectators, all with phone cameras, and not even one clip of the participants allegedly hit with bullets, let alone the paramedics attending them.
And yet, a billionaire candidate able to afford his own private Praetorian Guard, continues to parade himself across the country with the same government paid security force.
It makes you think, right?

>>376679
>too obvious staged incident
Please elaborate what makes you so certain. I can think of a few scenarios in which that could be considered possible, just before finding the notion plausibly INcredible.
I mean, either you believe that Crooks was the shooter who hit Trump's ear (not getting into why an how) or you think there was a second shooter (to which I agree). But the closest the second shooter could have been was the water tower. At that range and calculating for wind resistance and all, the odds of a sniper being able to hit JUST the ear and NOT the rest of his head is low. Then factor in his body movements. The bullet was in the air BEFORE he made his 'miraculous' head turn. The ONLY way that's possible is if the sniper had a direct 2-way to Trump, and counted down until placing the shot. Technically possible.
Except, I dont know if you noticed but Trump is a bit of a narcissist, and it's laughable to suggest that he conspired to risk his own life to possibly A. not get brained and B. capitalize on a political stunt.
Unless you're suggesting that he had a small explosive attached to his ear that was set off. But that would mean that the collateral damage was either expendible resources or crisis actors. Neither is impossible,....
So again, how was it obviously staged?

>>376679
>A too obvious staged incident I would say.
Do you have a single piece of evidence for this? If so, please post it in the relevant thread, or make a new thread.

Whether it was staged or not, it's probably best for them to wait till the end of his term.
Not only conservatives, but a lot of normies were quite shaken by the whole ordeal.

>>376680
>The bullet was in the air BEFORE he made his 'miraculous' head turn.
That's what the narrative keepers implanted in your brain and most agreed. However no one considered the most plausible scenery of all being a choreography where Trump performed as the actor he is and the bodyguards painted fake blood on his face while pretending to protecting Trump with their bodies.
And if evidence is requested, no better one that examine the good zoomed pictures of his ear, no scar can be found!
>>376681
>Do you have a single piece of evidence for this?
This is /mlpol/, right?
Would you mind to stop being a normie and think like an anon instead? Damn!

>>376688
Sorry, all I'm seeing is "Bla bla, TRUST ME BRO"

I'll follow up really quick.
Too many people are biased to assume that their disbelief of something is equivocable to invalidating evidence.
>This is /mlpol/, right?
>Would you mind to stop being a normie and think like an anon instead? Damn!
You couldn't invalidate your position more if you tried

>>376690
You are the living proof why influencers are hired; you only accept input from them while shutting your critical mind down.
Another issue here is that noponer is calling you out for your NPC attitude. I guess you all are bots. So be it then.

>>376692
So, are you admitting that when pressed, you're UNABLE to present anything beyond your disbelief as evidence of your certainty?
How npc of me.
Ive acknowledged a whole swath of possibilities, and am begging the question. Where does your certainty come from?

>>376693
>Where does your certainty come from?
It goes both ways fren. Ask that same question yourself.

>>376694
Not ur fren, chief
Im NOT certain! You'd have to be an idiot to do any more than attempt to assess a threshold of possibility!
And then there's (you) who's mind is already made up. Again, clearly Im the npc

>>376695
Myself arguing with an AI.

Character assassination and straw Manning? How did I get so lucky?!

>>376688
>just trust me bro
So you made it up?
Why should I believe you if you're not willing to back it up.
I didn't ask for a source, I asked for evidence.
>>376691
He thinks /mlpol/ is as stupid as whatever Facebook group he gets this garbage from.
>>376692
Nobody gives a shit about influencers.

>>376698
>He thinks /mlpol/ is as stupid as whatever Facebook group he gets this garbage from.
Agreed. It's a small consolation, but Im fine continuing the argument to allow him to continue to reveal his (ahem) totally-not-triple-paranthetical agenda.