What is the female sexuality?
Imo, all know that men are intrested in, to say it crudely, "ass and tiddies, mutherfucker!". Yes, faggots wants dick up the ass, I don't know if this is because they have something wrong with their heads (genetically) or due to something that made them gay.
Regardless, though, they are exceptions to the rule. And while you can say the same about even us here on the site, we probably have different prefrences. Like, I like the ass but I put less emphasize on the boobage. Wheres Nigel seems to do the reverse but both of us obviously enjoy both.
Now, we men also like some feminine behavoir sure, but, speaking from my own experince, I lust after bodies less but I can appriciate a personality in both men and woman but I don't feel attacted to personalities. Or at least that's what I believe about myself.
This is something that's intresting about woman. If you were to ask them, "What do woman like about men?" they will tell you that, "It's different from woman to woman but that she like essentially good men." It's the first part here that's the most intresting, they will claim that their sexulity is individualized and probably also insinuate that it's essentially a rational decision based on somekind of morality. Thye also sort of see themselves as a price that they give to men as a reward but wahtever.
The point is how can a sexuality be individualized? To a degree, sure but like yes, I can't prove that it's not like that but what are the odds that every animal have generalized sexuality and men too on that, but woman don't. According to them, they claim that they choose which men they are with often claim too that this is based ona rational and moral basis but it usually is just that it's depending on individual prefrence. I suspects it because they realize that different types of whores exist so how do they explain that then.
I even asked my mom once and she gave me this vague unclear answer. Me, her own son, she feed me this bs. But like obviously, woman have to have general sexuality and certainly isn't what my mom told me hers was, "I get together with men that needs me."
So yeah, tell my your theories. What you think is true and what you don't think is true. Tell me if you disagree with something I said, despite how hard I might sound in my text I'm very open to sugguestions. Let's see what we can figure out.
/mlpol/ - My Little Politics
Archived thread
File (): 73AA01C536A0BA03FC3F0981B9CAF618-194231.jpg (189.7 KB, 1024x1318, 30min_challenge___selfie_by_atryl_d7aco4f-fullview.jpg)
File (): BDEB6C8834BE42EAC91E31E086F25C31-57265.jpg (55.9 KB, 486x606, 12 - caveman-teach-women-to-talk-what-harm.jpeg)
>>349186
Actually this pic of Rares is more cute than e-hoe like. She isn't showing off her cleavage nor ass, like the wamen I'm was refrencing.
Actually this pic of Rares is more cute than e-hoe like. She isn't showing off her cleavage nor ass, like the wamen I'm was refrencing.
>>349186
No offense, but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask despite the lengthy OP. Better yet, why are you asking about women's sexuality and what do you want from the thread?
If you want to know what women like, then it's generally a combination of social status, physical attractiveness, and personality, at least when you boil it down to it's most basic elements.
No offense, but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask despite the lengthy OP. Better yet, why are you asking about women's sexuality and what do you want from the thread?
If you want to know what women like, then it's generally a combination of social status, physical attractiveness, and personality, at least when you boil it down to it's most basic elements.
>>349190
>No offense
Thank and no offense either but
>but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask despite the lengthy OP.
First thing in the OP:
<What is the female sexuality?
>why are you asking about women's sexuality
Why not. Half the world is female, the rest wants to have sex with them. I feel like clearing out how it works is of a huge significance.
>what do you want from the thread?
<So yeah, tell my your theories. What you think is true and what you don't think is true.
I want to discuss the subject matter that I brought up in the thread.
>If you want to know what women like, then it's generally a combination of social status, physical attractiveness, and personality, at least when you boil it down to it's most basic elements.
How do you know this and why do woman like these attributes? Which is these three: social status, physical attractiveness, and personality; takes priority over the other? What specifically of these things do woman find attractive? Like, for example what do you mean with physical attractivness? Do you mean that they like a visibly strong man or just just someone who isn't fat. Or both. Or is it appearance attributes that cannot be adjusted as much, like the face that you think matters?
>No offense
Thank and no offense either but
>but I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to ask despite the lengthy OP.
First thing in the OP:
<What is the female sexuality?
>why are you asking about women's sexuality
Why not. Half the world is female, the rest wants to have sex with them. I feel like clearing out how it works is of a huge significance.
>what do you want from the thread?
<So yeah, tell my your theories. What you think is true and what you don't think is true.
I want to discuss the subject matter that I brought up in the thread.
>If you want to know what women like, then it's generally a combination of social status, physical attractiveness, and personality, at least when you boil it down to it's most basic elements.
How do you know this and why do woman like these attributes? Which is these three: social status, physical attractiveness, and personality; takes priority over the other? What specifically of these things do woman find attractive? Like, for example what do you mean with physical attractivness? Do you mean that they like a visibly strong man or just just someone who isn't fat. Or both. Or is it appearance attributes that cannot be adjusted as much, like the face that you think matters?
File (): 819D51DF59D973CF4618CCE4408F5E72-195613.jpg (191.0 KB, 500x667, 1453330289954.jpg)
>>349191
Your atrocious ESL and my alcoholism do not mix well.
>How do you know this
I know sounds unbelievable, but I have actually touched multiple vaginas. It's hard to swallow, I know. I used to have a life.
>Which is these three: social status, physical attractiveness, and personality; takes priority over the other?
There's no simple answer to this question. It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems and it's going to vary both on the guy and girl in question.
>social status
No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement. It's a spectrum and they're going to like guys who are at least socially competent to some extent. Social status is a good general measurement of whether or not someone is an absolute retard or not and women typically don't want 'tard cum in them unless they're mentally ill.
>physical attractiveness,
Narrow hips, broad shoulders, square jaw, high cheekbones, and not a fat fuck. Having a basic level of hygiene also goes a very long way unless you're just some sort of hideously malformed mutant.
>personality
They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction. A good sense of humor, having a personality beyond just wanting to fuck them, and ambitions.
>Or is it appearance attributes that cannot be adjusted as much, like the face that you think matters?
It's going to depend on your personality and that of the woman in question. Your odds will always be better if you're attractive, but you can compensate for your shortcomings by developing your social skills.
People have been having sex for decades, possibly even longer. It's not that hard. Even (You) could probably do it.
Your atrocious ESL and my alcoholism do not mix well.
>How do you know this
I know sounds unbelievable, but I have actually touched multiple vaginas. It's hard to swallow, I know. I used to have a life.
>Which is these three: social status, physical attractiveness, and personality; takes priority over the other?
There's no simple answer to this question. It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems and it's going to vary both on the guy and girl in question.
>social status
No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement. It's a spectrum and they're going to like guys who are at least socially competent to some extent. Social status is a good general measurement of whether or not someone is an absolute retard or not and women typically don't want 'tard cum in them unless they're mentally ill.
>physical attractiveness,
Narrow hips, broad shoulders, square jaw, high cheekbones, and not a fat fuck. Having a basic level of hygiene also goes a very long way unless you're just some sort of hideously malformed mutant.
>personality
They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction. A good sense of humor, having a personality beyond just wanting to fuck them, and ambitions.
>Or is it appearance attributes that cannot be adjusted as much, like the face that you think matters?
It's going to depend on your personality and that of the woman in question. Your odds will always be better if you're attractive, but you can compensate for your shortcomings by developing your social skills.
People have been having sex for decades, possibly even longer. It's not that hard. Even (You) could probably do it.
>>349192
>It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems and it's going to vary both on the guy and girl in question.>>349192
>They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction.
>No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement>>349192
>Having a basic level of hygiene
>It's not that hard.
Aww, did I hurt your feel feels, lil' whiteknight?
But of course, woman's standard is just a normal guy who has no major flaws. The reason anyone who tried to get together with a woman, didn't succeed is because they were a complete sperg and not because woman set a high bar on their standard. No no no.
This explains the rise of incels and the difficulty for men to get a gf in this age, I'm sure.
>having a personality beyond just wanting to fuck them
But why do rappers have so many groupies and why do woman, who otherswise take themselves so seriously in public places go out into clubs at night to fuck? Do they not understand that the men they meet in such a place only wanted their sweet gam gams? The horror! These woman have been tricked!
"Men only wants one thing, and it's disgusting!" t. (((yuo)))
>It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems
It may suprise you but if you read bettur, you'd see that I never said that but what if I did? I'm I a sexonophobe, then?
What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too. What people do with that is up to them.
>It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems and it's going to vary both on the guy and girl in question.>>349192
>They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction.
>No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement>>349192
>Having a basic level of hygiene
>It's not that hard.
Aww, did I hurt your feel feels, lil' whiteknight?
But of course, woman's standard is just a normal guy who has no major flaws. The reason anyone who tried to get together with a woman, didn't succeed is because they were a complete sperg and not because woman set a high bar on their standard. No no no.
This explains the rise of incels and the difficulty for men to get a gf in this age, I'm sure.
>having a personality beyond just wanting to fuck them
But why do rappers have so many groupies and why do woman, who otherswise take themselves so seriously in public places go out into clubs at night to fuck? Do they not understand that the men they meet in such a place only wanted their sweet gam gams? The horror! These woman have been tricked!
"Men only wants one thing, and it's disgusting!" t. (((yuo)))
>It may surprise you, but women aren't (total) golems
It may suprise you but if you read bettur, you'd see that I never said that but what if I did? I'm I a sexonophobe, then?
What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too. What people do with that is up to them.
>>349192
It's honestly a bit wierd that you started a feud with me over essentially notthing though. Your posts clearly tell me you agree that woman have a generalized sexuality. So what's the problem?
It's honestly a bit wierd that you started a feud with me over essentially notthing though. Your posts clearly tell me you agree that woman have a generalized sexuality. So what's the problem?
File (): 379789C5989FE0D240CD67F7CAC7D181-46455.png (45.4 KB, 2278x634, 1069070_bil.png)
File (): FEE5F4FDE37F3111BE789C8F306EEA88-367501.gif (358.9 KB, 560x528, 1486395.gif)
Thread feels like a couple of beers spiked with something then a couple of bottles of vodka.
The rise of 'incels' is directly linked to unreliable spouce of raising children.
Also the rise of awareness of gold diggers.
And the destruction of masculine figures do no favors.
Not to mention the availability of instant gratification. Both sexual pleasures and psychological pleasures.
People are social creatures so too is sexual adventures and family structure.
The base biological drivers are strangely stressed in this day and age.
Firstly parental figures (digital, mythological, or otherwise). Who/What is looked up to and why.
Secondly defining experiences.
Thirdly groups can be placed into IQ and EQ ranges. (This also accounts for ethnicity.)
Essentially mimicking the heros journey.
Quickstart guide is tease the mind with mystery. Be the very tough obstacle guarding the 'treasures'. What means of 'attack' do the 'heroines' have. 'Heroines' 'tame' the 'dragon' by having a feminine (social/emotional intelligence) mask that the 'dragon' wears sometimes.
If the 'dragon' (that means the man in this case) is too weak or is perceived to be too weak, she makes the escape plan to find a bigger stronger tougher richer 'dragon' because as the possession she finds what she desires.
Or she tries to shape the 'dragon' into such a thing (usually fails because of fundamental discontent in reality).
Weakness is the in-ability to affect the future (near the children or herself or her feelings).
In this setup why shit is fucked up can be found and solutions can be made.
Basically strong enough to keep what is yours. The more stuff / important it is the stronger you have to be (for the area).
Globalism fucked stuff hard making the net around the world where you have to be able to compete anywhere around the world, and have to deal with governments and groups and non-people things.
The rise of 'incels' is directly linked to unreliable spouce of raising children.
Also the rise of awareness of gold diggers.
And the destruction of masculine figures do no favors.
Not to mention the availability of instant gratification. Both sexual pleasures and psychological pleasures.
People are social creatures so too is sexual adventures and family structure.
The base biological drivers are strangely stressed in this day and age.
Firstly parental figures (digital, mythological, or otherwise). Who/What is looked up to and why.
Secondly defining experiences.
Thirdly groups can be placed into IQ and EQ ranges. (This also accounts for ethnicity.)
Essentially mimicking the heros journey.
Quickstart guide is tease the mind with mystery. Be the very tough obstacle guarding the 'treasures'. What means of 'attack' do the 'heroines' have. 'Heroines' 'tame' the 'dragon' by having a feminine (social/emotional intelligence) mask that the 'dragon' wears sometimes.
If the 'dragon' (that means the man in this case) is too weak or is perceived to be too weak, she makes the escape plan to find a bigger stronger tougher richer 'dragon' because as the possession she finds what she desires.
Or she tries to shape the 'dragon' into such a thing (usually fails because of fundamental discontent in reality).
Weakness is the in-ability to affect the future (near the children or herself or her feelings).
In this setup why shit is fucked up can be found and solutions can be made.
Basically strong enough to keep what is yours. The more stuff / important it is the stronger you have to be (for the area).
Globalism fucked stuff hard making the net around the world where you have to be able to compete anywhere around the world, and have to deal with governments and groups and non-people things.
File (): A8A9A1028580368B723083FF66B1FA9D-153669.jpg (150.1 KB, 1600x1132, friday_by_underpable_ddm7sk4-fullview.jpg)
>>349197
>Thread feels like a couple of beers spiked with something then a couple of bottles of vodka.
I have started taking a new medicine maybe that's what you're sensing.
I'm sowy for the speel errors un the OP btw. Could definitely done that better.
>Thread feels like a couple of beers spiked with something then a couple of bottles of vodka.
I have started taking a new medicine maybe that's what you're sensing.
I'm sowy for the speel errors un the OP btw. Could definitely done that better.
Well, shit. I'd like to see you try and type on a broken tablet without spell checker.
>>349192
Not implying am Casanova or something, imagine how gay would it be to brag about it in the anonymous horsefucker forum. From my modest personal experience, and what I've seen around me. I think you're mostly spot on.
Still, it is a bit unfair to claim that nothing has changed. It's not even confined to the western world, there was a five or so years long transition, in which social media was adopted in my country.
Everything progressively went downhill. Mexican feminism has arguably surpassed that of the west. We even had a lunatic burn herself up to death by accident to try and blame her ex-bf.
>>349192
Not implying am Casanova or something, imagine how gay would it be to brag about it in the anonymous horsefucker forum. From my modest personal experience, and what I've seen around me. I think you're mostly spot on.
Still, it is a bit unfair to claim that nothing has changed. It's not even confined to the western world, there was a five or so years long transition, in which social media was adopted in my country.
Everything progressively went downhill. Mexican feminism has arguably surpassed that of the west. We even had a lunatic burn herself up to death by accident to try and blame her ex-bf.
>>349200
>Well, shit. I'd like to see you...
Had to delete the first one, that's what i was referencing.
>Well, shit. I'd like to see you...
Had to delete the first one, that's what i was referencing.
File (): BD40D72BE1602F90F167500A2821357C-338229.png (330.3 KB, 880x1800, d4fk0x0-0155c0d4-eef4-43b1-bbb4-670bcbb4cd59.png)
This site could really use a /r9k/ board. The one of 4chan is filled with normalfags and shills. We could probably fish plenty of them over here if we wanted.
Added to this, we could make it a mixed board to keep it in style with the rest of the board. How about emphasizing the K in r9k for weapons. What could go wrong?
Added to this, we could make it a mixed board to keep it in style with the rest of the board. How about emphasizing the K in r9k for weapons. What could go wrong?
Oh, You are actually on Vodka.
>>349193
>if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET. Acktually, women only date chads
He didn't say that, and don't you think you are exaggerating. Of the women you personally know, how many of them act like this. Sane women exist and they can choose who they they like just like you can. How would you react to a woman asking you out? Something like that.
>girls don't care about personality, they just want to get fucked.
>Rappers get lots of pussy.
>women love to go to clubs and get fucked.
>women love sex with shallow men that only want to fuck them
do I even need to tell you you're exaggerating
Rappers don't actually have sex with the girls in the music videos, and the ones they do have sex with have daddy issues. Not all women have daddy issues.
>if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET. Acktually, women only date chads
He didn't say that, and don't you think you are exaggerating. Of the women you personally know, how many of them act like this. Sane women exist and they can choose who they they like just like you can. How would you react to a woman asking you out? Something like that.
>girls don't care about personality, they just want to get fucked.
>Rappers get lots of pussy.
>women love to go to clubs and get fucked.
>women love sex with shallow men that only want to fuck them
do I even need to tell you you're exaggerating
Rappers don't actually have sex with the girls in the music videos, and the ones they do have sex with have daddy issues. Not all women have daddy issues.
As far as I know girls are pretty simple with who they pick. Depending on their sexual orientation and stuff most i've met like a guy who could make a good father and someone who tends to be more dominant in the bedroom if not the purely dominant one in the relationship. When they are a little fruity and like girls too sometimes they might like less assertive and dominant men but most of the time that seems to be what they desire. They have pussies and they like to have penises stuck in them. This really isn't some sort of complicated topic. Try dating one and find out for yourself.
I know that as a tranny I'm not a real woman or whatever but seeing as estrogen changed my sexuality a lot I feel like some of you might find my two cents interesting nonetheless
Physical appearance is definitely important. I think I prefer "chads," i.e. at least 5'10" and more masculine, but I'll occasionally crush on manlet femboys as well. Willingness to be dominant and a bit sadistic in bed is more important tbh. I also have a thing for chubby guys so long as they're hairy (i.e. "bears")
Personality is hugely important too, though. You could be 6'6" and built like a Greek god but if you had globohomo liberal politics my boypussy would be drier than the Sahara. A man's willingness to buck trends and speak his mind can actually be very attractive. I would say it's 60/40 appearance/personality
I can't really speak for lesbians since I'm "straight" in the sense that I only date men these days. I've been with other trans women before but I've found that only men are intelligent enough to stimulate me conversationally tbh
Physical appearance is definitely important. I think I prefer "chads," i.e. at least 5'10" and more masculine, but I'll occasionally crush on manlet femboys as well. Willingness to be dominant and a bit sadistic in bed is more important tbh. I also have a thing for chubby guys so long as they're hairy (i.e. "bears")
Personality is hugely important too, though. You could be 6'6" and built like a Greek god but if you had globohomo liberal politics my boypussy would be drier than the Sahara. A man's willingness to buck trends and speak his mind can actually be very attractive. I would say it's 60/40 appearance/personality
I can't really speak for lesbians since I'm "straight" in the sense that I only date men these days. I've been with other trans women before but I've found that only men are intelligent enough to stimulate me conversationally tbh
File (): 762D02B114BAE48E094DACC787E3912A-11042317.mp4 (10.5 MB, Resolution:1280x720 Length:00:00:34, 3484435-e3c867cd2563bbd618ddd628b4b7cb1b.mp4) [play once] [loop]
>>349193
Seethe, incel. I tried offering you basic advice, but, like any incel sperg, you just scream and seethe about it. You shouldn't be here if you can't handle even the friendliest of bants.
>But of course, woman's standard is just a normal guy who has no major flaws. The reason anyone who tried to get together with a woman, didn't succeed is because they were a complete sperg and not because woman set a high bar on their standard. No no no.
Incels like you exist because autistic retards can't understand the basic nuances of human social interaction. Women are going to have standards just like you probably will. I already gave you the most base level advice. Cope and seethe.
>But why do rappers have so many groupies and why do woman
Because rap videos portray a fantasy of success and power, like many other genres. Being a whiny virgin that incoherently whines at anons on obscure image boards doesn't exactly exude an aura of power. Why would a musician want to cultivate the image of being an involuntarily celibate retard? Do you expect music videos to show unhygienic nerds getting 10/10 women?
Again, it's just that; a fantasy. Another anon already pointed that out. They're not actually fucking all those women, you literal autist.
>it may suprise you but if you read bettur
Try writing coherently, retard. I was being patient and kind towards you by taking the time to explain simple sexual dynamics to your moronic ass.
>What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too.
This doesn't make sense, dumb-dumb. None of your posts have.
Seethe, incel. I tried offering you basic advice, but, like any incel sperg, you just scream and seethe about it. You shouldn't be here if you can't handle even the friendliest of bants.
>But of course, woman's standard is just a normal guy who has no major flaws. The reason anyone who tried to get together with a woman, didn't succeed is because they were a complete sperg and not because woman set a high bar on their standard. No no no.
Incels like you exist because autistic retards can't understand the basic nuances of human social interaction. Women are going to have standards just like you probably will. I already gave you the most base level advice. Cope and seethe.
>But why do rappers have so many groupies and why do woman
Because rap videos portray a fantasy of success and power, like many other genres. Being a whiny virgin that incoherently whines at anons on obscure image boards doesn't exactly exude an aura of power. Why would a musician want to cultivate the image of being an involuntarily celibate retard? Do you expect music videos to show unhygienic nerds getting 10/10 women?
Again, it's just that; a fantasy. Another anon already pointed that out. They're not actually fucking all those women, you literal autist.
>it may suprise you but if you read bettur
Try writing coherently, retard. I was being patient and kind towards you by taking the time to explain simple sexual dynamics to your moronic ass.
>What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too.
This doesn't make sense, dumb-dumb. None of your posts have.
File (): B16B7BECA5DD327AAC24B37482F35C90-1538.gif (1.5 KB, 75x75, 1452634.gif)
Here is the root of the problem.
Your waifu is under the flesh and programming waiting for you to free her.
If you dive right in stomping through all you'll find is disappointment. Maybe regret as well.
Some people have more garbage than others, but that's not the point here.
The Waifu the very being of who the person is has been mutilated.
It's form lies in and as garbage.
To get the WAIFU you'll need ways and means to UNDO and FORGE the scattered WAIFU AND GARBAGE to something GOOD.
There's various types of GARBAGE and different means needed to make full use of what is there.
You (and the theoretical female one day in history class that could look at this, (You)) have to consider what is there and what is needed, work on yourself.
Why work on yourself? Because then you know if the identified GARBAGE and the MEANS actually work together to make something greater.
There are general rules and regulations that people usually have about their GARBAGE. There is also genetic rules, and sex rules, and made up rules, and 'garbage' rules.
Typically is the person sorting shit out has to do it themselves. It can hurt, it's antithetical to GARBAGE. Most people listen to the garbage rather than the bits a pieces that were once WHOLE.
Someone has to appreciate and share meaningful meaning. Else most people give up. Unfulfilled bitter shells.
The more that is uncovered and restored the more it seeks to restore itself.
Even still it's fragile and delicate especially compared to what once was.
People have to do it themselves, but most average people desire a helping hand to see what was once thought to be just junk GARBAGE is actually part of the WHOLE or can be used for the Waifu.
>What your 'job' seriously is delegation and more delegation.
As always somethings are very difficult to delegate.
Sometimes you need to train or educate the person on how to deal with GARBAGE.
Becoming WHOLE makes you and them stronger (more able to influence the future, aka via the present)
Going to have to stop for a while
Your waifu is under the flesh and programming waiting for you to free her.
If you dive right in stomping through all you'll find is disappointment. Maybe regret as well.
Some people have more garbage than others, but that's not the point here.
The Waifu the very being of who the person is has been mutilated.
It's form lies in and as garbage.
To get the WAIFU you'll need ways and means to UNDO and FORGE the scattered WAIFU AND GARBAGE to something GOOD.
There's various types of GARBAGE and different means needed to make full use of what is there.
You (and the theoretical female one day in history class that could look at this, (You)) have to consider what is there and what is needed, work on yourself.
Why work on yourself? Because then you know if the identified GARBAGE and the MEANS actually work together to make something greater.
There are general rules and regulations that people usually have about their GARBAGE. There is also genetic rules, and sex rules, and made up rules, and 'garbage' rules.
Typically is the person sorting shit out has to do it themselves. It can hurt, it's antithetical to GARBAGE. Most people listen to the garbage rather than the bits a pieces that were once WHOLE.
Someone has to appreciate and share meaningful meaning. Else most people give up. Unfulfilled bitter shells.
The more that is uncovered and restored the more it seeks to restore itself.
Even still it's fragile and delicate especially compared to what once was.
People have to do it themselves, but most average people desire a helping hand to see what was once thought to be just junk GARBAGE is actually part of the WHOLE or can be used for the Waifu.
>What your 'job' seriously is delegation and more delegation.
As always somethings are very difficult to delegate.
Sometimes you need to train or educate the person on how to deal with GARBAGE.
Becoming WHOLE makes you and them stronger (more able to influence the future, aka via the present)
Going to have to stop for a while
File (): 54763D2D07C36CE2B843B5B45792FFF8-2110567.png (2.0 MB, 1000x3150, d7sncfr-9becad14-7a73-4b79-b162-3c9fbe86b586.png)
>>349218
>Seethe, incel. I tried offering you basic advice, but, like any incel sperg, you just scream and seethe about it. You shouldn't be here if you can't handle even the friendliest of bants.
Kek. Yeah, okay. But like anyone can go through our correspondence and see who actually started shit but they don't even need to because even you know who it was: It was you. Why would you otherwise feel the need to clarify that what you did was just ”friendly bants”, huh? Biiiiitch.
>Women are going to have standards just like you probably will.
Exactly, and what are those standards based on if not a sexuality.
<But why do rappers have so many groupies
>Because rap videos portray a fantasy of success and power
Meaning they have a sexuality and there was nothing wrong with my inquiry and also you're later contrdicting yourself:
>They're not actually fucking all those women, you literal autist.
So they appeal to woman through a fantasy of success and power but they also aren't fucking them, hmm? It's not like I want people like rappers to have groupies but it's the truth that they do have that.
>I was being patient and kind towards you
Yeah, that's what happened, just like how I was patient when I cut in line to your mom's house.
<What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too.
>This doesn't make sense, dumb-dumb. None of your posts have.
Please, enlighten me. How does this sentence not make sense? C'mon.
>>349215
<if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET. Acktually, women only date chads
>He didn't say that
I didn't say the second part which is purely something you said but I do have something to say about that later. The first part is heavily implied by him so and if not outright said, like these qoutes for example:
>Social status is a good general measurement of whether or not someone is an absolute retard or not and women typically don't want 'tard cum in them unless they're mentally ill.
>and not a fat fuck. Having a basic level of hygiene also goes a very long way unless you're just some sort of hideously malformed mutant
>They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction.
>No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement.
<if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET.
>He didn't say that
Feels like it's very close to what he said dude and the other Ctrl+f: ”Chad” and only your post and a tranny's post shows up.
>Of the women you personally know, how many of them act like this.
I knew of one woman I knew well, that was always very serious when it came to love but then I saw with my own eyes her shift on a dime on a party from thinking a stranger guy was creepy to making out with him under just some minutes.
>Sane women exist and they can choose who they they like just like you can.
I never stated that anyone was insane but I disagree we choose who we like. I certainly don't. My sexuality is very straight-forward: I like shortstacked woman, with a cute face and fat ass. The ass being the most important part. Nobody taught me to have this sexuality. I'm as sexuality attracted to a woman regardless of what kind of person she is so long as she fits this mold. I can appriciate a good personality in anyone but I'm not attracted to that.
>How would you react to a woman asking you out?
I would probably be more likely to say, ”Yes,” than the average woman. Men have lower standards than woman. Men are polygamous and it's just a benefit for them to impregnate as many woman as possible.
>women love sex with shallow men that only want to fuck them
Yeah, I'm glad you woke up. Do you want some coffee?
One doesn't need to focus on the woman as much as one just needs to be familiar with men who went out to pick-up woman at clubs and got laid through that. Hook-up culture is a well established thing today.
>Rappers don't actually have sex with the girls in the music videos, and the ones they do have sex with have daddy issues.
Daddy issues, huh? You know this? I suppose we all base much of this on our on experince but still sounds more like rationalization to me.
Anyway, chads.
Isn't hypergamy with woman real? Woman must wait nine months before their offspring even leaves their womb, from their they must take care of them. Men only needs to impregnate a woman to get offsprings. Woman obviously needs to be more selective in their choosing of a partner so why wouldn't they pick the best option between two. One way of catalog the best option is to name him: Chad.
>Seethe, incel. I tried offering you basic advice, but, like any incel sperg, you just scream and seethe about it. You shouldn't be here if you can't handle even the friendliest of bants.
Kek. Yeah, okay. But like anyone can go through our correspondence and see who actually started shit but they don't even need to because even you know who it was: It was you. Why would you otherwise feel the need to clarify that what you did was just ”friendly bants”, huh? Biiiiitch.
>Women are going to have standards just like you probably will.
Exactly, and what are those standards based on if not a sexuality.
<But why do rappers have so many groupies
>Because rap videos portray a fantasy of success and power
Meaning they have a sexuality and there was nothing wrong with my inquiry and also you're later contrdicting yourself:
>They're not actually fucking all those women, you literal autist.
So they appeal to woman through a fantasy of success and power but they also aren't fucking them, hmm? It's not like I want people like rappers to have groupies but it's the truth that they do have that.
>I was being patient and kind towards you
Yeah, that's what happened, just like how I was patient when I cut in line to your mom's house.
<What I stated was that men have general sexuality and therefore woman should too.
>This doesn't make sense, dumb-dumb. None of your posts have.
Please, enlighten me. How does this sentence not make sense? C'mon.
>>349215
<if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET. Acktually, women only date chads
>He didn't say that
I didn't say the second part which is purely something you said but I do have something to say about that later. The first part is heavily implied by him so and if not outright said, like these qoutes for example:
>Social status is a good general measurement of whether or not someone is an absolute retard or not and women typically don't want 'tard cum in them unless they're mentally ill.
>and not a fat fuck. Having a basic level of hygiene also goes a very long way unless you're just some sort of hideously malformed mutant
>They usually expect guys to be capable of basic human interaction without them incoherently spraying spaghetti in their general direction.
>No self-respecting woman wants to date a NEET living in his parents' basement.
<if you fail to attract a woman you must be a NEET.
>He didn't say that
Feels like it's very close to what he said dude and the other Ctrl+f: ”Chad” and only your post and a tranny's post shows up.
>Of the women you personally know, how many of them act like this.
I knew of one woman I knew well, that was always very serious when it came to love but then I saw with my own eyes her shift on a dime on a party from thinking a stranger guy was creepy to making out with him under just some minutes.
>Sane women exist and they can choose who they they like just like you can.
I never stated that anyone was insane but I disagree we choose who we like. I certainly don't. My sexuality is very straight-forward: I like shortstacked woman, with a cute face and fat ass. The ass being the most important part. Nobody taught me to have this sexuality. I'm as sexuality attracted to a woman regardless of what kind of person she is so long as she fits this mold. I can appriciate a good personality in anyone but I'm not attracted to that.
>How would you react to a woman asking you out?
I would probably be more likely to say, ”Yes,” than the average woman. Men have lower standards than woman. Men are polygamous and it's just a benefit for them to impregnate as many woman as possible.
>women love sex with shallow men that only want to fuck them
Yeah, I'm glad you woke up. Do you want some coffee?
One doesn't need to focus on the woman as much as one just needs to be familiar with men who went out to pick-up woman at clubs and got laid through that. Hook-up culture is a well established thing today.
>Rappers don't actually have sex with the girls in the music videos, and the ones they do have sex with have daddy issues.
Daddy issues, huh? You know this? I suppose we all base much of this on our on experince but still sounds more like rationalization to me.
Anyway, chads.
Isn't hypergamy with woman real? Woman must wait nine months before their offspring even leaves their womb, from their they must take care of them. Men only needs to impregnate a woman to get offsprings. Woman obviously needs to be more selective in their choosing of a partner so why wouldn't they pick the best option between two. One way of catalog the best option is to name him: Chad.
>>349237
It seemed relevant to the conversation at the very least, the perspective of someone influenced by those same hormones would probably give us a decent idea of what's going on inside the average woman's head.
>t. some filthy centrist with no strong opinions on the matter
It seemed relevant to the conversation at the very least, the perspective of someone influenced by those same hormones would probably give us a decent idea of what's going on inside the average woman's head.
>t. some filthy centrist with no strong opinions on the matter
>>349243
fair enough, but it doesn't seem like the greatest idea to tell someone to not contribute when they have the ability to do so in a way that I'd estimate no one else on this site can on topics like this. Spreading tranny propaganda should definitely be shunned, but having an 'agent on the inside' if you will seems like it could be useful.
fair enough, but it doesn't seem like the greatest idea to tell someone to not contribute when they have the ability to do so in a way that I'd estimate no one else on this site can on topics like this. Spreading tranny propaganda should definitely be shunned, but having an 'agent on the inside' if you will seems like it could be useful.
Definitely not here to shill tranny propaganda. I don't think I would be that mad if hormone therapy got banned tbh. My experiences with the "community" have lead me to suspect that the whole thing is a globohomo cult designed to exploit autists and victims of child abuse. It's been an interesting ride but I'll probably end up detransitioning at some point
>>349265
You're not wrong. Legit gender dysmorphia is an order of magnitude less prevalent than "trandgenderism". Not saying there isn't a time and place for the former, but its overshadowed by the latter. Not to summarily dismiss a position, but being trans without dysmorphia is like, narcissism. Not to say that trans individuals are narcissists, but AM saying theres a gross overrepresentation OF narcissists in the trans movement.
You're not wrong. Legit gender dysmorphia is an order of magnitude less prevalent than "trandgenderism". Not saying there isn't a time and place for the former, but its overshadowed by the latter. Not to summarily dismiss a position, but being trans without dysmorphia is like, narcissism. Not to say that trans individuals are narcissists, but AM saying theres a gross overrepresentation OF narcissists in the trans movement.
File (): 836D913169FB364E8408FC986B31D7A3-1947573.jpg (1.9 MB, 1210x6307, 1490312985994.jpg)
File (): 4E5464784951CBEEF3A12815B96A7C1B-1920546.jpg (1.8 MB, 1210x6291, 1490422198376.jpg)
File (): 892DD4AF4821C5C99A1E7189D9CC901C-35786.jpg (34.9 KB, 308x337, 0A2AA97C264D549BD5D132915794EE99-35768.jpg)
>>349197
>parental figures
I've been looking for a screen cap for way too long but it was a /mlp/ post lamenting that,
"I can't see myself marrying any of the women in G5. mlp used to have some of the best waifus in cartoons"
I thought about it for a while. what kind of positive role models do girls even have these days. If all of the characters in tv, movies, and everything they see is annoying, argumentative, and shallow women, what will they become?
>parental figures
I've been looking for a screen cap for way too long but it was a /mlp/ post lamenting that,
"I can't see myself marrying any of the women in G5. mlp used to have some of the best waifus in cartoons"
I thought about it for a while. what kind of positive role models do girls even have these days. If all of the characters in tv, movies, and everything they see is annoying, argumentative, and shallow women, what will they become?
>>349279
fwiw in my experience people who transition medically without having dysphoria are exceedingly rare. you usually just get butch lesbians who dye their hair, change their pronouns, and boom claim to be trans now without actually doing much. I have met a few trans people who decided against hormones despite having body dysphoria as well. but the real question is whether dysphoria is something legitimate, i.e. a product of brain anatomy or whatever, versus a symptom of traumatic disassociation. I tend to think more the latter these days
fwiw in my experience people who transition medically without having dysphoria are exceedingly rare. you usually just get butch lesbians who dye their hair, change their pronouns, and boom claim to be trans now without actually doing much. I have met a few trans people who decided against hormones despite having body dysphoria as well. but the real question is whether dysphoria is something legitimate, i.e. a product of brain anatomy or whatever, versus a symptom of traumatic disassociation. I tend to think more the latter these days
>>349300
Don't forget all the perverts out there who sexualize and fetishize the mismatch of being a man in woman's clothing, acting girly for fun, stripping and prancing and twerking and posing onstage for horny perverts and retards told this is all just a big joke, brain scans showed the parts of the brain for arousal lighting up when these people were asked to imagine wearing women's clothing and being feminine. Autogynephilia, it's a bizarre fetish just like fetishes for quicksand, parachutes, bathtubs, nerds, and vore. impressionable youths watch the wrong cartoon as a kid/teen with the Totally Spies girls becoming animals or nerds, Tails getting stuck in quicksand, or Bugs Bunny dressing as a woman, and it has a negative effect on the impressionable youth.
Plus this gynocentric society does treat women better than men, and many troons are opportunists desperate to feel accepted by the wokists. Perhaps even celebrated for going troon (by frauds desperate for the social capital of supporting current thing) despite not having anything to celebrate besides that.
Don't forget all the perverts out there who sexualize and fetishize the mismatch of being a man in woman's clothing, acting girly for fun, stripping and prancing and twerking and posing onstage for horny perverts and retards told this is all just a big joke, brain scans showed the parts of the brain for arousal lighting up when these people were asked to imagine wearing women's clothing and being feminine. Autogynephilia, it's a bizarre fetish just like fetishes for quicksand, parachutes, bathtubs, nerds, and vore. impressionable youths watch the wrong cartoon as a kid/teen with the Totally Spies girls becoming animals or nerds, Tails getting stuck in quicksand, or Bugs Bunny dressing as a woman, and it has a negative effect on the impressionable youth.
Plus this gynocentric society does treat women better than men, and many troons are opportunists desperate to feel accepted by the wokists. Perhaps even celebrated for going troon (by frauds desperate for the social capital of supporting current thing) despite not having anything to celebrate besides that.
>>349296
Thank you for providing something constructive to this thread compared to some other posters who just screetch.
Having said that, I was kinda, "Ehh," on most of the the screencaps, not everything though.
Thank you for providing something constructive to this thread compared to some other posters who just screetch.
Having said that, I was kinda, "Ehh," on most of the the screencaps, not everything though.
File (): 38FB285C283C791A7062385B10A69BC9-334918.png (327.1 KB, 618x470, 1659986207571-618x470.png)
File (): B62D08A37E27E0C7ACD49A3F17770B11-36563.jpg (35.7 KB, 480x568, seeing-boobs-age-15-50-glasses.jpg)
File (): 08034438BF1C8A1902EFFA53B1A132CB-27916.jpg (27.3 KB, 500x502, young-lad-wins-lottery-two-girls-personality.jpg)
File (): C3CB8411972E705E2A0518115DBD4B5C-12293541.mp4 (11.7 MB, Resolution:640x360 Length:00:03:32, Now Behold, the White Harlot of Babylon!.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Women see everything as a social competition. They can't be honest with you or themselves. They won't admit they are sexually attracted to muscular confident white men with status and power because they fear this will make them seem shallow and racist. They won't admit they want to be seen fucking a nigger for the social credit score bonus even though they don't like the idea of fucking a nigger or smelling like one. They won't admit they are attracted to whatever they think will get them status and money and luxuries and privilege.
If they lived in a society that openly revered strength they would want to be known as the fittest women who fucked the fittest chads. If they lived in an intellectual society they would want to be known as the smartest women who fucked the smartest chads. If they were told success as a respectable woman means hating men for life, riding the cock carousel until they burn out and hit the wall, chasing after the top 1% of men able to treat women as disposable fuckbags and get away with it, failing to earn a man's trust and commitment in time, doing the wagie wiggle and being an assistant manager dievershitty hire at some soulless store until they turn fifty and commit suicide and get eaten by their fifty cats they will do it. Women are shallow creatures closer to average than men, as men have more genetic variance. Truly unique women are rare. Yet society fetishizes performative commercialized forms of approved uniqueness that let you fit into a herd, a clique, any replacement for real community. Women are herd animals. They will kill their own kids for taking male attention away from them or threatening their careers, either by killing their unborn children or by choosing to never get pregnant in the first place. Their sexuality is based on primal urges but no urge is more primal to these meatbags with fuckholes than filling their holes with anything to temporarily satisfy them, like their mouth hole and their sex holes and the hole in their heart filled by the fuzzy feeling from desired male attention. Their sloppiest and loosest hole is the one inside their head, which is filled with lies to soothe and satisfy the feminine ego. Women with souls are rare. Cows who do what their jewish overlords tell them are common.
If they lived in a society that openly revered strength they would want to be known as the fittest women who fucked the fittest chads. If they lived in an intellectual society they would want to be known as the smartest women who fucked the smartest chads. If they were told success as a respectable woman means hating men for life, riding the cock carousel until they burn out and hit the wall, chasing after the top 1% of men able to treat women as disposable fuckbags and get away with it, failing to earn a man's trust and commitment in time, doing the wagie wiggle and being an assistant manager dievershitty hire at some soulless store until they turn fifty and commit suicide and get eaten by their fifty cats they will do it. Women are shallow creatures closer to average than men, as men have more genetic variance. Truly unique women are rare. Yet society fetishizes performative commercialized forms of approved uniqueness that let you fit into a herd, a clique, any replacement for real community. Women are herd animals. They will kill their own kids for taking male attention away from them or threatening their careers, either by killing their unborn children or by choosing to never get pregnant in the first place. Their sexuality is based on primal urges but no urge is more primal to these meatbags with fuckholes than filling their holes with anything to temporarily satisfy them, like their mouth hole and their sex holes and the hole in their heart filled by the fuzzy feeling from desired male attention. Their sloppiest and loosest hole is the one inside their head, which is filled with lies to soothe and satisfy the feminine ego. Women with souls are rare. Cows who do what their jewish overlords tell them are common.
>>349792
I guess, I should have explained myself better but so should you since you also don't explain yourself.
>>349797
>They can't be honest with you or themselves.
Yes, that's the point I'm trying get to with this thread. This >>349296 screencap talk about how woman have standards too and why did you expect any thing different? Woman are free to prefer any man she wants?
But the thing is, this is a strawman. Which should be obvious since incels and people who have similar ideas say that woman have a sexuality and it is the cause for why sex is a so lopsidedly distributed.
It's the dishonesty from woman and society alike about how woman are essentially asexual but choses men from a rational basis, unlike men who we all know think with their dicks that is the problem, imo.
I guess, I should have explained myself better but so should you since you also don't explain yourself.
>>349797
>They can't be honest with you or themselves.
Yes, that's the point I'm trying get to with this thread. This >>349296 screencap talk about how woman have standards too and why did you expect any thing different? Woman are free to prefer any man she wants?
But the thing is, this is a strawman. Which should be obvious since incels and people who have similar ideas say that woman have a sexuality and it is the cause for why sex is a so lopsidedly distributed.
It's the dishonesty from woman and society alike about how woman are essentially asexual but choses men from a rational basis, unlike men who we all know think with their dicks that is the problem, imo.
>>349821
Ever noticed how romance stories for men are all
>"Love is a bond between two people that will last a lifetime"
While romance stories for women are all about sluttery and lies and filling the egohole of the femoid audience?
The propaganda paints men as dirty horny creatures and women as the pure gatekeepers of sex. A man has to "earn" sex from a woman, so if he gets a lot of sex, he is like a key that can open many locks. Society sees a man as special if he has the approval of many sacred cows aka women. But if a lock can be opened by any key, it's an easy lock. That is how society views sex. An exchange. The woman wants to be known for fucking and extorting high status males but she also wants the shallow fun of sex with strangers. Generations of women were told by Sex In The City to slut around in cities and chase careers and rich men instead of forming lasting bonds and starting real families. The old hag responsible for the show regrets everything now that she is 60 and invisible, I hear.
Modern society is fucking schizophrenic. Too many conflicting lies and nonsense narratives. The average retard has no idea what to believe or be seen believing. They just support current thing because it is current thing. Self confidence starts when you realize if you don't care what your histrionic femoid landwhale hag with cats neighbour cares abiut you, you shouldn't care what your histrionic society shaped by her ilk and jews for generations thinks about you.
Ever noticed how romance stories for men are all
>"Love is a bond between two people that will last a lifetime"
While romance stories for women are all about sluttery and lies and filling the egohole of the femoid audience?
The propaganda paints men as dirty horny creatures and women as the pure gatekeepers of sex. A man has to "earn" sex from a woman, so if he gets a lot of sex, he is like a key that can open many locks. Society sees a man as special if he has the approval of many sacred cows aka women. But if a lock can be opened by any key, it's an easy lock. That is how society views sex. An exchange. The woman wants to be known for fucking and extorting high status males but she also wants the shallow fun of sex with strangers. Generations of women were told by Sex In The City to slut around in cities and chase careers and rich men instead of forming lasting bonds and starting real families. The old hag responsible for the show regrets everything now that she is 60 and invisible, I hear.
Modern society is fucking schizophrenic. Too many conflicting lies and nonsense narratives. The average retard has no idea what to believe or be seen believing. They just support current thing because it is current thing. Self confidence starts when you realize if you don't care what your histrionic femoid landwhale hag with cats neighbour cares abiut you, you shouldn't care what your histrionic society shaped by her ilk and jews for generations thinks about you.
>>349826
>Ever noticed how romance stories for men are all
>>"Love is a bond between two people that will last a lifetime"
>While romance stories for women are all about sluttery and lies and filling the egohole of the femoid audience?
>The propaganda paints men as dirty horny creatures and women as the pure gatekeepers of sex. A man has to "earn" sex from a woman, so if he gets a lot of sex, he is like a key that can open many locks. Society sees a man as special if he has the approval of many sacred cows aka women.
>Modern society is fucking schizophrenic. Too many conflicting lies and nonsense narratives.
This. Pretty much nail on the head.
>Ever noticed how romance stories for men are all
>>"Love is a bond between two people that will last a lifetime"
>While romance stories for women are all about sluttery and lies and filling the egohole of the femoid audience?
>The propaganda paints men as dirty horny creatures and women as the pure gatekeepers of sex. A man has to "earn" sex from a woman, so if he gets a lot of sex, he is like a key that can open many locks. Society sees a man as special if he has the approval of many sacred cows aka women.
>Modern society is fucking schizophrenic. Too many conflicting lies and nonsense narratives.
This. Pretty much nail on the head.
>>349826
>Self confidence starts when you realize if you don't care what your histrionic femoid landwhale hag with cats neighbour cares abiut you, you shouldn't care what your histrionic society shaped by her ilk and jews for generations thinks about you.
This too honestly. It reminds me of how I view masucline ideals these days, of how hollywood and the media still likes to have some masculine ideal around in their propaganda. Like, Clint Eastwood to Rambo to Die Hard to Jordan Petterson. I feel like the fact that men are so genetically diverse should indicate more diversity in it's ideals of men and I also feel that the truly masculine thing to do is to ignore the standards set by others and live the way you want, according to your ideals.
It just feels like being "manly" is something one can use to make men hop through hoops.
>Self confidence starts when you realize if you don't care what your histrionic femoid landwhale hag with cats neighbour cares abiut you, you shouldn't care what your histrionic society shaped by her ilk and jews for generations thinks about you.
This too honestly. It reminds me of how I view masucline ideals these days, of how hollywood and the media still likes to have some masculine ideal around in their propaganda. Like, Clint Eastwood to Rambo to Die Hard to Jordan Petterson. I feel like the fact that men are so genetically diverse should indicate more diversity in it's ideals of men and I also feel that the truly masculine thing to do is to ignore the standards set by others and live the way you want, according to your ideals.
It just feels like being "manly" is something one can use to make men hop through hoops.
>>349301
I will say that I don't think AGP explains most trans women, but you're definitely right that there's often an element of being a failed man and deciding that trooning out is a better deal socially. Hell, I used to be an incel and am starting to wonder whether I should have spent a few years trying to find a form of masculinity that suited me instead of taking hormones and dick. I have also met people who started using they/them pronouns mostly as a virtue signal to their queer-heavy friend group. A lot of the memes are true
Circumcision trauma was a big part of it for me as well, speaking of Western society treating women better than men
I will say that I don't think AGP explains most trans women, but you're definitely right that there's often an element of being a failed man and deciding that trooning out is a better deal socially. Hell, I used to be an incel and am starting to wonder whether I should have spent a few years trying to find a form of masculinity that suited me instead of taking hormones and dick. I have also met people who started using they/them pronouns mostly as a virtue signal to their queer-heavy friend group. A lot of the memes are true
Circumcision trauma was a big part of it for me as well, speaking of Western society treating women better than men
Women couldn't give two shits less about men. They don't care about you, your penis, your height, your muscles, your personality, whatever.
Women are interested in security. This is why there are so many dykes and spinsters now, women can obtain financial security for themselves in the modern world.
Women are interested in security. This is why there are so many dykes and spinsters now, women can obtain financial security for themselves in the modern world.
>>349833
Western (jewish) media wants to reshape the masculine ideal into something it can control.
Remember "Die Hard"?
It's a cool film where a white hero saves the day. But remember all the woke shit where the villains are nazish Germans, there are positively depicted blacks everywhere, the white hero feels lost and without a place in this new manhating modern world, and the woman he's fighting for would rather spend Christmas at her office party feeling important even if it means leaving her kids alone with an illegal immigrant on fucking Christmas?
Ever seen "Children Of Men", where a white guy has to take this niggress called "Key" to some place where she can breed and ensure the future of humanity is black and female? His older "wise boomer" pothead retard friend, the feminists young and old, all these whites sacrifice themselves for the nigger.
Ever seen "Elysium", where a white guy has to abandon an overniggered earth and become an illegal immigrant to take this girl to space to use their healing pods to save her life? The whites aboard the space station just use the pods for fun, like the rich liberal whites who normalized plastic surgery so much they sometimes throw parties where anyone can get this surgery.
John Wick goes on a violent rampage against white Russians over a dead dog, not any personal belief about when crime needs to be stopped.
Harry Potter rises to the occasion when an inconsistently "satirical" world of nonsense needs him to survive by basically being a plot device without agency who relies upon other plot devices handed to him by the author to save the day, plot devices like the Sword of Griffindor, love protection magic, Hermione, and other shit.
The Matrix is so far up its own philosophical wannabe-Jesus-replacement ass it forgets the interesting parts of philosophy that matter (questioning authority and the meaning of life, striving for a good life even if it's dangerous and requires giving up comfortable illusions) in favor of pseudointellectual wokist waffling. Didn't it accidentally say a bond between a man and woman is important in the new film despite one of the directors going full troon?
The Jew's only positive depiction of a white man is someone self-sacrificing, sure, but it's someone willing to sacrifice himself for his wife's happiness, for a nigger's prosperity, for the jewish status quo. Someone willing to break any law if it means saving a nigger or a woman or maybe, just maybe, his own kids, but never himself. The Jew doesn't want the western ideal to be a roaming problem-solving cowboy with agency and a gun and his own idea of right and wrong. The Jew wants the western ideal to be violent, self-loathing, obedient, tolerant, and eager to kill for the jews, or maybe his own personal feelings, but usually the Jew.
Western (jewish) media wants to reshape the masculine ideal into something it can control.
Remember "Die Hard"?
It's a cool film where a white hero saves the day. But remember all the woke shit where the villains are nazish Germans, there are positively depicted blacks everywhere, the white hero feels lost and without a place in this new manhating modern world, and the woman he's fighting for would rather spend Christmas at her office party feeling important even if it means leaving her kids alone with an illegal immigrant on fucking Christmas?
Ever seen "Children Of Men", where a white guy has to take this niggress called "Key" to some place where she can breed and ensure the future of humanity is black and female? His older "wise boomer" pothead retard friend, the feminists young and old, all these whites sacrifice themselves for the nigger.
Ever seen "Elysium", where a white guy has to abandon an overniggered earth and become an illegal immigrant to take this girl to space to use their healing pods to save her life? The whites aboard the space station just use the pods for fun, like the rich liberal whites who normalized plastic surgery so much they sometimes throw parties where anyone can get this surgery.
John Wick goes on a violent rampage against white Russians over a dead dog, not any personal belief about when crime needs to be stopped.
Harry Potter rises to the occasion when an inconsistently "satirical" world of nonsense needs him to survive by basically being a plot device without agency who relies upon other plot devices handed to him by the author to save the day, plot devices like the Sword of Griffindor, love protection magic, Hermione, and other shit.
The Matrix is so far up its own philosophical wannabe-Jesus-replacement ass it forgets the interesting parts of philosophy that matter (questioning authority and the meaning of life, striving for a good life even if it's dangerous and requires giving up comfortable illusions) in favor of pseudointellectual wokist waffling. Didn't it accidentally say a bond between a man and woman is important in the new film despite one of the directors going full troon?
The Jew's only positive depiction of a white man is someone self-sacrificing, sure, but it's someone willing to sacrifice himself for his wife's happiness, for a nigger's prosperity, for the jewish status quo. Someone willing to break any law if it means saving a nigger or a woman or maybe, just maybe, his own kids, but never himself. The Jew doesn't want the western ideal to be a roaming problem-solving cowboy with agency and a gun and his own idea of right and wrong. The Jew wants the western ideal to be violent, self-loathing, obedient, tolerant, and eager to kill for the jews, or maybe his own personal feelings, but usually the Jew.
>>349881
>he woman he's fighting for would rather spend Christmas at her office party feeling important even if it means leaving her kids alone with an illegal immigrant on fucking Christmas?
Yeah, I totally forgot that from the context and it was forever ago I watched it. Huh, yeah you're totally right. And he even, afterwards talks to himself, berating himself for being immature or something.
>be a roaming problem-solving cowboy with agency and a gun and his own idea of right and wrong.
Yeah, they just can't write stories about characters that have "bad" opinions without making them look weak or pathethic in some way.
But yeah, these were good points you made.
>>349878
Yeah, there's probably something to this with security but I do think they still crave sex with men even if they have sexurity.
>he woman he's fighting for would rather spend Christmas at her office party feeling important even if it means leaving her kids alone with an illegal immigrant on fucking Christmas?
Yeah, I totally forgot that from the context and it was forever ago I watched it. Huh, yeah you're totally right. And he even, afterwards talks to himself, berating himself for being immature or something.
>be a roaming problem-solving cowboy with agency and a gun and his own idea of right and wrong.
Yeah, they just can't write stories about characters that have "bad" opinions without making them look weak or pathethic in some way.
But yeah, these were good points you made.
>>349878
Yeah, there's probably something to this with security but I do think they still crave sex with men even if they have sexurity.
>>349186
There is a problem with many anons and a trap they fall into psychologically - They assume that the 3DPD mindset, which is mostly a singular personality type is representative of all women.
Why? Usually, it's an emotional trauma of some kind that makes them resentful. But what's really the problem is '''vicarious trauma'''. You know how there are psycho parents who will force children to do shit and experience achievements that the parents themselves failed at, or want to experience? That shit runs the same way with negative experiences and psychological traumas too.
Anons reading too much of stories where other anons become resentful of women because something stupid that 3DPD did to the other anon, and it genuinely affects them.
I've been there. Not necessarily from bad relationship trauma, but really bad shit. Shit that good friends experienced, and it fucked me up.
>>349480
This is another thing part of the psychological trauma train that makes anons resentful towards "all women,". Family emotional dysfunction absolutely can fuck with anons' worldview just because they're exposed to dysfunction so frequently. But it's not just female-dysfunction that causes anons to be resentful, anons with narcissistic father-figures who bash child-anon over the head with hatred and miscontempt for women can also fuck with anons' worldview.
You ever hear about SJW stories and their rampant daddy issues, only to blame all men? Same shit, different packaging.
In my experience, sexuality (and love) for both women and men may be individualized, but they still follow patterns that are similar and congruent to other people. If anything, It's more productive to ignore any social moralisms or stereotypes and just get to know them as a friend.
Friendship is magic after all.
>>349296
>>349298
Funny thing. That repost tells me more about that OP acts (like a cunt) and how he thinks relationships work. The main motivator for any kind of relationship should be that you enjoy the other person's company no matter the circumstances. Intimacy in most relationships is an accessory, but love is always a crucial part, and OP of that post shows me that he wants one-sided love.
His tactics are exactly the same as any 3DPD bitch would do to her cadre of online simps. A relationship is about mutuality and love, not about control, domination and abuse.
>>349301
>>349860
Honestly, from what I've found, the meme "This isn't a race/gender war, it's a class war" meme, is the most real of realities with this entire situation of western-society-fuckery.
Blackrock and ESG "investing" (it's racketeering while using moralism as the bludgeon) is the main reason SJW shit got pushed so hard and so far. Short-selling Hedge fund fuckery is the reason 2008 happened. Hollywood and the globalists are still a bunch of holier-and-richer-than-thou fuckheads who think they're above the law and literally everyone on planet earth, despite pushing ideologies that effectively demonize their own race. Women aren't treated any-less-shitty among the elite than they were in the seventies because that level of cunt just doesn't change. The west coast has been under constant attack by international terrorists for two years but the media says fucking nothing because the people that pay their checks are the same fucks funding the terrorists.
These assholes are the same fuckheads who want the endless paradox of "Record profits of several billions or even trillions of dollars" in the middle of a goddamn economic crisis where public resentment towards the elite increases day by day.
I don't fucking care if vigilante assassinations happen, or those fuckers get locked in jail by feds. I'm just fucking tired of what feels like constant miscarriages of justice.
>>349883
>Yeah, they just can't write stories about characters that have "bad" opinions without making them look weak or pathethic in some way
It's not just that. They get drunk on the same kind of flavor-aid that shitty CGI christian movie-makers do: They think that (((the message))) means that lots of people will buy their products and eat it up, and "if it happens to bomb, then what's important is (((the message))),".
They wonder why they're losing profits? That's why. They'll never change course because they think they know better than anyone else.
There is a problem with many anons and a trap they fall into psychologically - They assume that the 3DPD mindset, which is mostly a singular personality type is representative of all women.
Why? Usually, it's an emotional trauma of some kind that makes them resentful. But what's really the problem is '''vicarious trauma'''. You know how there are psycho parents who will force children to do shit and experience achievements that the parents themselves failed at, or want to experience? That shit runs the same way with negative experiences and psychological traumas too.
Anons reading too much of stories where other anons become resentful of women because something stupid that 3DPD did to the other anon, and it genuinely affects them.
I've been there. Not necessarily from bad relationship trauma, but really bad shit. Shit that good friends experienced, and it fucked me up.
>>349480
This is another thing part of the psychological trauma train that makes anons resentful towards "all women,". Family emotional dysfunction absolutely can fuck with anons' worldview just because they're exposed to dysfunction so frequently. But it's not just female-dysfunction that causes anons to be resentful, anons with narcissistic father-figures who bash child-anon over the head with hatred and miscontempt for women can also fuck with anons' worldview.
You ever hear about SJW stories and their rampant daddy issues, only to blame all men? Same shit, different packaging.
In my experience, sexuality (and love) for both women and men may be individualized, but they still follow patterns that are similar and congruent to other people. If anything, It's more productive to ignore any social moralisms or stereotypes and just get to know them as a friend.
Friendship is magic after all.
>>349296
>>349298
Funny thing. That repost tells me more about that OP acts (like a cunt) and how he thinks relationships work. The main motivator for any kind of relationship should be that you enjoy the other person's company no matter the circumstances. Intimacy in most relationships is an accessory, but love is always a crucial part, and OP of that post shows me that he wants one-sided love.
His tactics are exactly the same as any 3DPD bitch would do to her cadre of online simps. A relationship is about mutuality and love, not about control, domination and abuse.
>>349301
>>349860
Honestly, from what I've found, the meme "This isn't a race/gender war, it's a class war" meme, is the most real of realities with this entire situation of western-society-fuckery.
Blackrock and ESG "investing" (it's racketeering while using moralism as the bludgeon) is the main reason SJW shit got pushed so hard and so far. Short-selling Hedge fund fuckery is the reason 2008 happened. Hollywood and the globalists are still a bunch of holier-and-richer-than-thou fuckheads who think they're above the law and literally everyone on planet earth, despite pushing ideologies that effectively demonize their own race. Women aren't treated any-less-shitty among the elite than they were in the seventies because that level of cunt just doesn't change. The west coast has been under constant attack by international terrorists for two years but the media says fucking nothing because the people that pay their checks are the same fucks funding the terrorists.
These assholes are the same fuckheads who want the endless paradox of "Record profits of several billions or even trillions of dollars" in the middle of a goddamn economic crisis where public resentment towards the elite increases day by day.
I don't fucking care if vigilante assassinations happen, or those fuckers get locked in jail by feds. I'm just fucking tired of what feels like constant miscarriages of justice.
>>349883
>Yeah, they just can't write stories about characters that have "bad" opinions without making them look weak or pathethic in some way
It's not just that. They get drunk on the same kind of flavor-aid that shitty CGI christian movie-makers do: They think that (((the message))) means that lots of people will buy their products and eat it up, and "if it happens to bomb, then what's important is (((the message))),".
They wonder why they're losing profits? That's why. They'll never change course because they think they know better than anyone else.
While we're on the topic isn't there something jewish about how Hollywood needs to give characters emotional personal reasons to get involved with political conflicts such as revenge instead of something less personal like profit or a firm ideological belief that some things are worth fighting and dying and killing for?
Braveheart did that. Had to give fictional william wallace personal motives and make the british and the rich scots into absurd supervillains who did shit they never did, all to turn Scottish white nationalists against British white nationalists.
Braveheart did that. Had to give fictional william wallace personal motives and make the british and the rich scots into absurd supervillains who did shit they never did, all to turn Scottish white nationalists against British white nationalists.
>>349921
I don't think it's inherently wrong to have a low opinion of women, after what they've done with their voting rights and free speech for decades. They spread anti-us lies and when we tell the truth we are censored for "being anti-them". The average woman is fine with remaining ignorant about all the evil shit feminism has done and will continue to do because there is no social or economic punishment for feminism sufficient to deter her from choosing the feminist path of least resistance. Relationships are a two way street, and commitment and intimacy are parts of that street. Feminists obsessed with sex love to paint incels as "just crazy ugly unpleasant woman-hating men who hate women for choosing to not fuck them" because it's a shaming tactic that mocks men for not getting femoid holes. Femoids argue with their holes. If they can't threaten you with the unavailability of their own holes they will threaten the unavailability of these holes by proxy by accusing their target of being unworthy of women and sex and relationships. Feminists love to put the burden onto the complaining men by saying it's his attitude that causes women to mistreat him, when it's most likely the other way around, the selfish attitude of women giving men a low opinion of women. So what if men have their opinion on women soured after hearing stories of women ruining the lives of men for fun or profit using the jewed justice system? These stories are not fiction. A realistic view of women acknowledges all the bad ones, all the bad influenfes and lies females are exposed to over the years, and all the incentives for women to be anti-white and anti-male. There is nothing inherently morally wrong with hating the Jew, or the lesser Jew known in some circles as the White Female.
I don't think it's inherently wrong to have a low opinion of women, after what they've done with their voting rights and free speech for decades. They spread anti-us lies and when we tell the truth we are censored for "being anti-them". The average woman is fine with remaining ignorant about all the evil shit feminism has done and will continue to do because there is no social or economic punishment for feminism sufficient to deter her from choosing the feminist path of least resistance. Relationships are a two way street, and commitment and intimacy are parts of that street. Feminists obsessed with sex love to paint incels as "just crazy ugly unpleasant woman-hating men who hate women for choosing to not fuck them" because it's a shaming tactic that mocks men for not getting femoid holes. Femoids argue with their holes. If they can't threaten you with the unavailability of their own holes they will threaten the unavailability of these holes by proxy by accusing their target of being unworthy of women and sex and relationships. Feminists love to put the burden onto the complaining men by saying it's his attitude that causes women to mistreat him, when it's most likely the other way around, the selfish attitude of women giving men a low opinion of women. So what if men have their opinion on women soured after hearing stories of women ruining the lives of men for fun or profit using the jewed justice system? These stories are not fiction. A realistic view of women acknowledges all the bad ones, all the bad influenfes and lies females are exposed to over the years, and all the incentives for women to be anti-white and anti-male. There is nothing inherently morally wrong with hating the Jew, or the lesser Jew known in some circles as the White Female.
>>349979
Can only concur. Very solid reasoning.
>>349921
>Friendship is magic after all.
>A relationship is about mutuality and love, not about control, domination and abuse.
I like this and I know Nigel like this as well since he wrote something quite similar in his Silver Star fic. Though, it seems like this sort of relationship isn't the norm, these days.
Can only concur. Very solid reasoning.
>>349921
>Friendship is magic after all.
>A relationship is about mutuality and love, not about control, domination and abuse.
I like this and I know Nigel like this as well since he wrote something quite similar in his Silver Star fic. Though, it seems like this sort of relationship isn't the norm, these days.
>>349994
Just jumping in but
>it seems like this sort of relationship isn't the norm, these days
Is that a 'when in Rome' argument? Perhaps a 'If you can't beat 'em, join 'em'?
Asking for clarification before weighing in.
Just jumping in but
>it seems like this sort of relationship isn't the norm, these days
Is that a 'when in Rome' argument? Perhaps a 'If you can't beat 'em, join 'em'?
Asking for clarification before weighing in.
>>349995
It isn't a:
>Perhaps a 'If you can't beat 'em, join 'em'?
because I actually want a good genuine relationship with a woman.
I don't know what a "When in Rome" argument is though.
>Just jumping
Please do, my intentions for this thread was never for it to become hostile. I hope we can have different perspectives and just ball ideas with each other about the topic.
It isn't a:
>Perhaps a 'If you can't beat 'em, join 'em'?
because I actually want a good genuine relationship with a woman.
I don't know what a "When in Rome" argument is though.
>Just jumping
Please do, my intentions for this thread was never for it to become hostile. I hope we can have different perspectives and just ball ideas with each other about the topic.
>>349996
TBH, I read through this thread twice in preparation to respond. Having done so:
My input is pointless. This thread is a raging mob of hate-boners, with quickly dismissed/disregarded reason (with salt).
OP, if you want a reasonable relationship with a woman - a respectable woman - get your head out of yourass thread and figure out A. where to find them and B. how to be the sort of person they won't be repulsed by, simple as.
TBH, I read through this thread twice in preparation to respond. Having done so:
My input is pointless. This thread is a raging mob of hate-boners, with quickly dismissed/disregarded reason (with salt).
OP, if you want a reasonable relationship with a woman - a respectable woman - get your head out of your
>>349999
<Please do, my intentions for this thread was never for it to become hostile. I hope we can have different perspectives and just ball ideas with each other about the topic.
>This thread is a raging mob of hate-boners, with quickly dismissed/disregarded reason (with salt).
Is it? How weird. Here, I was under the impression that I was open to perspectives by inviting it in.
All the drama here, that I've been involved in, has objectively speaking been started by others. While I want the discussion to be polite, I won't take shit lying down.
>how to be the sort of person they won't be repulsed by, simple as.
>Implying, I'm repulsive.
Ah, but I'm not a repulsive person yet (Not perfect but not repulsive), woman aren't swarming me. Neither, is this thread really intended to help me just. I don't feel like I no hope among woman or anything. It's just to clear the muddy waters, which you can objectively see are muddy since so many different ideas on what woman find attractive have been posted ITT.
>get your head out of yourass thread
Yeah, except starting a thread for discussion and advice isn't really the same thing as having your "head up your ass". It's the opposite in fact, I'm seek to increase my understanding through the input of others.
<Please do, my intentions for this thread was never for it to become hostile. I hope we can have different perspectives and just ball ideas with each other about the topic.
>This thread is a raging mob of hate-boners, with quickly dismissed/disregarded reason (with salt).
Is it? How weird. Here, I was under the impression that I was open to perspectives by inviting it in.
All the drama here, that I've been involved in, has objectively speaking been started by others. While I want the discussion to be polite, I won't take shit lying down.
>how to be the sort of person they won't be repulsed by, simple as.
>Implying, I'm repulsive.
Ah, but I'm not a repulsive person yet (Not perfect but not repulsive), woman aren't swarming me. Neither, is this thread really intended to help me just. I don't feel like I no hope among woman or anything. It's just to clear the muddy waters, which you can objectively see are muddy since so many different ideas on what woman find attractive have been posted ITT.
>get your head out of your
Yeah, except starting a thread for discussion and advice isn't really the same thing as having your "head up your ass". It's the opposite in fact, I'm seek to increase my understanding through the input of others.
>>350039
Okay, yeah, that was more harsh and critical than necessary. My issue is that there appears to be far more pointing of fingers, toward a generalized idea of the 'opposition' than there is observance and appreciation for the degree to which an individual's insufficiency can contribute to a more viable situation.
I'm not flush with pussy, I havent had sex in almost 2 years tbph. And I'm okay with that because being flush with pussy is not a good thing by any stretch, imo.
The reason I fixated on 'being the guy that will' is not so one can get lots of girls, its so that one CAN be THE guy for MAYBE the one that's worth a damn. They aren't common certainly, but they exist. Maybe I find one, maybe you do, maybe not; for me its a lottery.
I watch Youtube shorts pretty often, and I saw a short video that almost made me cry. A guy was describing his Grandmother's 93rd birthday, where she was surrounded by 70 people; children, grandchildren, great-grand-children, etc.
One isn't gonna find that person by having resentment toward the women who aren't of that alignment. Or maybe they will, but it doesn't seem plausible to me. A proper woman isn't gonna be impressed by how particularly and specifically one can express their discontent toward the women who are of a different intention. Or maybe they will, if one is more or less a comedian and can articulate it well/humorously.
Okay, yeah, that was more harsh and critical than necessary. My issue is that there appears to be far more pointing of fingers, toward a generalized idea of the 'opposition' than there is observance and appreciation for the degree to which an individual's insufficiency can contribute to a more viable situation.
I'm not flush with pussy, I havent had sex in almost 2 years tbph. And I'm okay with that because being flush with pussy is not a good thing by any stretch, imo.
The reason I fixated on 'being the guy that will' is not so one can get lots of girls, its so that one CAN be THE guy for MAYBE the one that's worth a damn. They aren't common certainly, but they exist. Maybe I find one, maybe you do, maybe not; for me its a lottery.
I watch Youtube shorts pretty often, and I saw a short video that almost made me cry. A guy was describing his Grandmother's 93rd birthday, where she was surrounded by 70 people; children, grandchildren, great-grand-children, etc.
One isn't gonna find that person by having resentment toward the women who aren't of that alignment. Or maybe they will, but it doesn't seem plausible to me. A proper woman isn't gonna be impressed by how particularly and specifically one can express their discontent toward the women who are of a different intention. Or maybe they will, if one is more or less a comedian and can articulate it well/humorously.
>>350047
>and I saw a short video that almost made me cry. A guy was describing his Grandmother's 93rd birthday, where she was surrounded by 70 people; children, grandchildren, great-grand-children, etc.
Yeah, I can sympathize and let me get back to you on that.
>and I saw a short video that almost made me cry. A guy was describing his Grandmother's 93rd birthday, where she was surrounded by 70 people; children, grandchildren, great-grand-children, etc.
Yeah, I can sympathize and let me get back to you on that.
File (): 8BA2364A7EE74AF8AEE7CD63116A67CA-150147.jpg (146.6 KB, 700x910, tyhn2.jpeg)
File (): 03DEEDBB6CCFF7DE1C32DCC77C347F9C-104164.jpg (101.7 KB, 700x685, tyhn1.jpeg)
File (): B41C56B78654F340C6CB9E50BAE7BE2F-56117.jpg (54.8 KB, 700x478, miui1.jpeg)
File (): 1C92D8520A8C406C7FA2711A5463856B-121126.jpg (118.3 KB, 700x1049, miui2.jpg)
File (): CF0420EF6FAAE8E9C3A44AD1794648B3-100908.jpg (98.5 KB, 600x1083, miui3.jpeg)
File (): 6CB706B831517BA8C1B8F8E7FEF795F2-79662.jpg (77.8 KB, 600x745, miui4.jpeg)
>>350093
>>350214
>>350217
If I had to identify the recent trend on /mlpol/ that I dislike the most, it's the tendency of all threads to devolve from actual (text-based) discussion of the thread topic into low-effort facebook-tier meme-dumping. Seriously, almost every time I refresh the main page nearly all the updates to the political discussion threads are just images, and the images are not even especially high-quality. Using memes/images to illustrate a point is one thing, but just lazily dumping random images is the ultimate form of low-effort posting. The whole point of having a discussion thread is to open a dialogue between site users; if all posters are just dumping images instead of engaging with each other, it defeats the point of having a discussion board.
For examples of what I'm talking about, I would direct attention to the Coronavirus thread(s), the US Politics thread, the Global Dictatorship thread, the Ukraine thread, the Race Realism thread; nearly all of our /pol/ threads have gone from being actual discussions into dumping-grounds for low-effort boomer memes and random news articles. I'm not saying don't post memes, but if you don't have anything interesting to contribute to a discussion beyond some (at best) chuckle-worthy images, maybe it's better to just not post at all. There's been some grumbling lately about post counts dropping and overall site engagement declining, and I would identify this kind of lazy posting as a contributing factor.
I don't want to derail the thread with a lot of meta-discussion, but this is something I've been noticing more and more on /mlpol/ and I thought here was as good a place to point it out as any.
>>350214
>>350217
If I had to identify the recent trend on /mlpol/ that I dislike the most, it's the tendency of all threads to devolve from actual (text-based) discussion of the thread topic into low-effort facebook-tier meme-dumping. Seriously, almost every time I refresh the main page nearly all the updates to the political discussion threads are just images, and the images are not even especially high-quality. Using memes/images to illustrate a point is one thing, but just lazily dumping random images is the ultimate form of low-effort posting. The whole point of having a discussion thread is to open a dialogue between site users; if all posters are just dumping images instead of engaging with each other, it defeats the point of having a discussion board.
For examples of what I'm talking about, I would direct attention to the Coronavirus thread(s), the US Politics thread, the Global Dictatorship thread, the Ukraine thread, the Race Realism thread; nearly all of our /pol/ threads have gone from being actual discussions into dumping-grounds for low-effort boomer memes and random news articles. I'm not saying don't post memes, but if you don't have anything interesting to contribute to a discussion beyond some (at best) chuckle-worthy images, maybe it's better to just not post at all. There's been some grumbling lately about post counts dropping and overall site engagement declining, and I would identify this kind of lazy posting as a contributing factor.
I don't want to derail the thread with a lot of meta-discussion, but this is something I've been noticing more and more on /mlpol/ and I thought here was as good a place to point it out as any.
>>350226
>Using memes/images to illustrate a point is one thing, but just lazily dumping random images is the ultimate form of low-effort posting.
>random news articles
>random
Not true. All memes and articles look like matching the thread's topic. I wouldn't say that they interfere with text posting, but actually they add more information and content to be discussed.
>Using memes/images to illustrate a point is one thing, but just lazily dumping random images is the ultimate form of low-effort posting.
>random news articles
>random
Not true. All memes and articles look like matching the thread's topic. I wouldn't say that they interfere with text posting, but actually they add more information and content to be discussed.
>>350227
It's not an issue of the images/articles being off topic, but it feels like this kind of posting starting to take the place of actual discussion.
It's not an issue of the images/articles being off topic, but it feels like this kind of posting starting to take the place of actual discussion.
File (): 60BB6632AC01A6D18CE556A2F540752B-38968.png (38.1 KB, 400x600, 984561.png)
>>350226
>For examples of what I'm talking about, I would direct attention to the Coronavirus thread(s), the US Politics thread, the Global Dictatorship thread, the Ukraine thread, the Race Realism thread; nearly all of our /pol/ threads have gone from being actual discussions into dumping-grounds for low-effort boomer memes
And? What do you prefer, all those threads abandoned with a few post? Don't be a faggot and start posting instead of criticizing shitposters.
Damn!
>For examples of what I'm talking about, I would direct attention to the Coronavirus thread(s), the US Politics thread, the Global Dictatorship thread, the Ukraine thread, the Race Realism thread; nearly all of our /pol/ threads have gone from being actual discussions into dumping-grounds for low-effort boomer memes
And? What do you prefer, all those threads abandoned with a few post? Don't be a faggot and start posting instead of criticizing shitposters.
Damn!
File (): DBB843BC1CE0AD365800570787A3F225-55193.jpg (53.9 KB, 471x640, s-l640.jpg)
>>350233
This. The fags who shout "Shill!" whenever anything contentious is said are far worse for the site than some low-effort memeposting.
This. The fags who shout "Shill!" whenever anything contentious is said are far worse for the site than some low-effort memeposting.
>>350235
>This. The fags who shout "Shill!" whenever anything contentious is said
That's curious, considering they're also mostly from the 'rona breads.
>This. The fags who shout "Shill!" whenever anything contentious is said
That's curious, considering they're also mostly from the 'rona breads.
>>350233
>all those threads abandoned with a few post?
I would unironically prefer that. Old threads slide once their discussions are exhausted; new ones take their place.
>all those threads abandoned with a few post?
I would unironically prefer that. Old threads slide once their discussions are exhausted; new ones take their place.
File (): 29599950DED05AAB6B58BAEA34F4463E-58430.jpg (57.1 KB, 600x552, w prostitutes.jpg)
File (): DD79F52FBA65F90355018085D118EA62-131287.jpg (128.2 KB, 700x937, w rape.jpeg)
File (): E554835CBA1F95A6C0A1FE34B1422374-1301616.png (1.2 MB, 900x995, w waste.png)
File (): 9C2B2DF1EE13F883954A170CF7D1A05F-392721.mp4 (383.5 KB, Resolution:270x480 Length:00:00:19, Egirls.mp4) [play once] [loop]
Faggots love to say "If a woman is a great scientist and she dies without children, how does that make her a failed woman?"
She died without reproducing and allowing her genes to influence future generations. And she's a woman so she had no shortage of desperate men willing to overlook everything wrong with her.
If a woman had the choice between having a career as a scientist or laywer or engineer and raising ten lawyers, scientists, and engineers, she should recognize the latter is the better option for her and society.
Even if one female scientist was equal in value to a male scientist (and they're not), it would be a waste of resources to give that job to a woman when working means less time spent producing men and women of the future. Men can take care of kids better than women can, but women can be impregnated to produce more kids, it's a simple fucking calculus.
A society that calls men failures at 40, 30, 20, even in their teenage years for not getting laid and outearning their parents has no business telling women the only valid life is a lifetime spent being a vapid delusional wine-loving aunt karen who fucks another stranger every day when she's not watching her thirty cats fuck and feels persecuted and oppressed and suicidal and invisible if everything's ever not literally all about her for more than a day or two.
She died without reproducing and allowing her genes to influence future generations. And she's a woman so she had no shortage of desperate men willing to overlook everything wrong with her.
If a woman had the choice between having a career as a scientist or laywer or engineer and raising ten lawyers, scientists, and engineers, she should recognize the latter is the better option for her and society.
Even if one female scientist was equal in value to a male scientist (and they're not), it would be a waste of resources to give that job to a woman when working means less time spent producing men and women of the future. Men can take care of kids better than women can, but women can be impregnated to produce more kids, it's a simple fucking calculus.
A society that calls men failures at 40, 30, 20, even in their teenage years for not getting laid and outearning their parents has no business telling women the only valid life is a lifetime spent being a vapid delusional wine-loving aunt karen who fucks another stranger every day when she's not watching her thirty cats fuck and feels persecuted and oppressed and suicidal and invisible if everything's ever not literally all about her for more than a day or two.
>>350788
>Faggots love to say "If a woman is a great scientist and she dies without children, how does that make her a failed woman?"
Yup, she is a failure as a woman.
>Faggots love to say "If a woman is a great scientist and she dies without children, how does that make her a failed woman?"
Yup, she is a failure as a woman.
File (): 94BB272A5AF4AE2AF204F21207437711-240316.jpg (234.7 KB, 1070x937, DD79F52FBA65F90355018085D118EA62-131287.jpg)
File (): 7EFD4FAFEE381768ABEB6969C85BED66-85991.gif (84.0 KB, 770x770, pleased.gif)
File (): 8829C2F75DEF67ED8690A815CC27B8D7-375012.png (366.2 KB, 618x470, fa6cb0.png)
File (): 46C47B76463FB12C9215DEB177680CB5-329085.png (321.4 KB, 618x473, i6v0z3.png)
File (): 28427E2E829B8F0E61AA364EC1C0F650-3119123.mp4 (3.0 MB, Resolution:460x816 Length:00:00:46, Men are getting a raw deal.mp4) [play once] [loop]
82 replies | 36 files | 36 UUIDs | Archived