Massive wave of liberal seethe incoming. Get to saltmining.
368 replies and 283 files omitted.
Wouldn’t a blue board violate “rule 10”?
Like the competitive advantage we have now? It's not like we'd lose users because of it.
>>344392>People would genuinely love to come to this site if there was a blue board for horses and a red board for horse porn. /mlpol/ doesn't have to go away, any more than I need permission to post anime in /tg/ or /ck/.
I can agree with that, tbh. I say it's worth trying.>>344395>Are you implying we're not horsefuckery enough for the horsefucking club?
A little bit, ngl. Some posters here think we should keep clop folders "only for utility", ffs. That and the general lack of pony content posted.>And no politics right?
Maybe not as the subject matter, but not with 4cuck-tier "no racism outside of /pol/" bans. Some posters might just want to post ponies without political discussion in the middle.>So to clarify, your position is "people will come to mlpol if we dilluted it into 2 separate pony boards, and fucked off with all the politics".
"Diluted" isn't the natural consequence of adding a sfw pony board. It would bring more users to the site, pony users. Those users would use the red board and the blue board. Maybe then we'd have more actual greentext, new art, and pony reaction images posted regularly, instead of just once a month.>>344117
That's not segregation, that would be accomodation for the community. It's not like we'd ban ponies on the main board.
This conversation is too important to be smothered by the Roe v. Wade thread. Also, it's shitting up my abortion thread, so I made a /qa/ thread:>>>/qa/6711
>>344423>This conversation is too important to be smothered by the Roe v. Wade thread. Also, it's shitting up my abortion thread, so I made a /qa/ thread
But remember that proposed changes are suspicious in their intend.
>>344427>proposed changes are suspicious in their intend
Are they though? Seriously?
It was one thing when detractors created an artificial crisis over policy to spoiler gay porn, but since then I've hardly seen anything proposed that looks even remotely suspicious. Even if the idea turns out to be shit, we could easily undo it.
How’s this for an idea? Let’s deny federal funding to arms manufacturers and dealers based in states who do not allow unrestricted abortion up to 20 weeks in. It could potentially be done with budget reconciliation and sidestep a filibuster.
That's not as easy as you make it sound, and I bet that a court that was willing to gut Roe v. Wade wade would just as easily strike down that too.
So would the same court also strike down the federal limitation on state drinking ages?
There's nothing in the constitution that says that, and not very people pushing for it, so idk why that would happen.
So we should then deny federal funding to arms manufacturers and dealers in states with abortion restrictions like that. After all, shouldn’t we make sure that the imperialist US efforts are not concentrated at children like that?
If the US is truly involved in wars with other countries illegally and could call its military to act against its own population, wouldn’t it stand to reason that they should keep the children safe? We need to make sure that arms manufacturers and dealers are not located in areas where children who would otherwise have been aborted could all be rounded up conveniently and shot.
>>344533>this shit again.
You're not even arguing in good faith at this point. Stop wasting my time with nonsense.
Disagreements aside, there are real ethical social-utility arguments in favor of abortion that you could be making, idk why you find the time to go about on these absurd tangents that nobody's going to take seriously.
>>344534>You're not even arguing in good faith at this point.
You aren’t if you think the US has no right to take a stance on the Ukraine conflict due to their imperialist nature. I’d only be using your talking points.>Disagreements aside, there are real ethical social-utility arguments in favor of abortion that you could be making, idk why you find the time to go about on these absurd tangents that nobody's going to take seriously.
And? No one here believes them.
Abortion has nothing to do with Ukraine or Russia.>And? No one here believes them.
Then wtf are you even doing? If this is your idea of trolling, it doesn't seem all that funny.
>>344536>Abortion has nothing to do with Ukraine or Russia.
The argument was that American militarism could affect children, especially in regions where would-have-been aborted children would all be easy to find. If we defund gun manufacturers and dealers there, it would be harder for people to manufacture or buy guns to kill children.>Then wtf are you even doing? If this is your idea of trolling, it doesn't seem all that funny.
Trying to make sure the other side is heard.
>>344546>American militarism could affect children, especially in regions where would-have-been aborted children would all be easy to find.
I doubt that, tbh.> it would be harder for people to manufacture or buy guns to kill children.
No it wouldn't, people could just buy guns elsewhere.>Trying to make sure the other side is heard.
You are the only person I've heard this absurdist nonsense from. Stop wasting everyone's time. Make real, sensible arguments or fuck off.
>>344548>No it wouldn't, people could just buy guns elsewhere.
Good luck with that when most of the pro-choice states have stricter gun control laws.
I'm not going to engage this nonsense anymore. I'll just say that I disagree.
>Jewess Jen Psaki thinks it just fine to harass, intimidate and threaten Supreme Court justices. Now she has been doxxed. I sure hope hundreds of people don’t make her life a living hell. That would be a damn shame.
If you attend this, just make sure not to shout any actual threats, physically block her, or step on her property. Know your right to protest, but don't get arrested for petty nonsense either.
My question to the “doxxers” is how they know that they are going to the correct person’s house or know the correct identifying details. There could very well be multiple people with the exact same name.
I guess they won't know for sure until they go there.
https://mastodon.social/@session/108293353036143175>Roe v. Wade is predicated on privacy — repealing it opens the door to a massive legislative backslide for the right to choose which information you do and don't share.
session is an open source project, I believe its similar to matrix: focusing on security for communication.
These people don't care about personal responsibility. They only care that they can do whatever their whiny liberal bitchass wants to other people. Like sue people for not making cakes or not putting their kid in dragqueen hour at school or if you have been vaccinated.
But now they suddenly care about keeping personal information private.
I hope race mixing to be outlawed and multiculturalism to be swiftly phased out.
I’m sorry, but what does this have to do with SCOTUS overturning Roe
I think it is related to the reeeing from the left and tweets that says "Next they will ban trans people from going to school, gay marriages, interracial marriage marriages, ...".
OK, but it would mean that there would need to be a strict definition of races and cultures in order for them to become defined by the law. Said law could mean that people could simply say “I identify as X” and get out of any potential charges.
Also, I think we should keep this sort of discussion brief and simple. The mods are cracking down on thread derailment and someone has already been warned for trying to make the Ukrainian Invasion Thread about antisemitism.
>>344599>trying to make the Ukrainian Invasion Thread about antisemitism.
It feels necessary to clarify that wasn't truly about antisemitism or Ukraine.
There's one Jewish troll on this site who thinks antisemitism is morally unacceptable but cannot provide a valid argument for anything he believes. He just says dumb shit, assumes he's right, challenges others to answer his retarded hypotheticals, and insults people. I find it hard to believe his dishonest tactics would fool anyone, and he's like this on every subject, repeating the mainstream propaganda aka jewish lies. It's like he's just poking people with a stick for his own amusement, never taking his earplugs out to actually listen to any responses.
>>344601>It feels necessary to clarify that wasn't truly about antisemitism or Ukraine.
But it seems as though literally every conversation on this board eventually devolves into “hur durr muh Jooz” and it is hard to stay on topic whenever that happens. People are dying and abortion rights are being restricted, but the most that some people here can talk about is “muh Jooz control the government”.>There's one Jewish troll on this site who thinks antisemitism is morally unacceptable but cannot provide a valid argument for anything he believes.
Even if he is legitimately acting in bad faith and just trolling, it seems as though there are multiple of them. I have previously seen posts touting similar rhetoric that have different styles of writing and adherence to grammatical rules.>He just says dumb shit, assumes he's right, challenges others to answer his retarded hypotheticals, and insults people.
First, what are some examples of “his” “retarded” hypotheticals? Second, I see that much of this site involves insulting people in manners such as “kill yourself on livestream” without providing much of an argument.>It’s like he's just poking people with a stick for his own amusement, never taking his earplugs out to actually listen to any responses.
To be fair, much of these responses use sources that would stand to gain from their statements being true and/or have agendas in the matter, so they could perhaps be biased towards one side. In fairness against that, though, I have also noticed that there are some issues where mainstream sources are biased as well and would also stand to gain from their side being true, but it does not change the original statement.
Though again, I don’t want to have to be called out for derailing the discussion like a certain person was. I think we should keep this brief and make sure it does not derail this thread.
To keep things brief there is always a Jew behind every targeted and coordinated attack on the white man, his rights, and his lands.
That might get repetitive to hear but if it's not Jews it's a nigger or woman or woman nigger taught by Jews to do things the Jewish way for the Jews.
Sometimes random acts of violence by niggers against whites seem unrelated to Jews, until you remember the jewish propaganda machine demonizing whites and pitting the nigs jews imported against whites.
But I have a question.
How can anyone "Have something to gain" by telling the truth about the factual and logical holes in the Holocaust myth when the legal and social punishments for disbelieving it are so severe?
These people aren't like the scammers who say "Buy my book, it contains the secret to health and success".
Those who expose the Holohoax for what it is do so openly. They let you look at the science, they explain their reasoning, they expose those caught lying to preserve the holomyth. Except this holomyth doesn't have a detective, it fears detectives.
There are so many holes in the holohoax myth, you could make a comic about a cartoony bird noticing things wrong with the shit his friends say and only those in the know would recognize these logical errors as logical errors also seen in the holohoax myth.
There is no financial benefit to making yourself someone the jewish antiwhite war machine has a reason to target that can offset the costs of being targeted by it.
Look at all those leftists who shout "I was almost radicalized by the far-right alt-right neo nazis but then I snapped out of it! I know what the enemy looks like, be afraid and never look for yourself!". Look at the fame and money they get for this TedTalk (more like FedTalk) shit.
People don't call the Holohoax fake for money. They call it fake because the truth matters more to them than money.
Let us clarify this shit.
The jew brought that oxymoron buzzword to this board and anons are biting.
Criticism of the jews is due as they are guilty of most calamities. Jews are entrenched in power positions and cannot deny responsibility, Ukraine included.
Consideting behind closed doors they've been overtly engaged in child sacrifice for millenia, I almost appreciate their honesty
Aren't agnostics basically the same as atheists though? Their charts should be combined.
Of course I’m not in favor of forcing people to have abortions, but memes aside, I’m really curious as to how organ donors for children are selected. I mean, organ donor card holders likely typically die and donate their organs as adults, so they may be too big.
You should look into Plan Parenthood's industry of body parts.
They can't even wear masks right.
Murder Derangement Syndrome MDS Is Real.